When drug treatments bias genetic studies: Mediation and interaction
Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait. Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of dru...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 14; no. 8; p. e0221209 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Public Library of Science
28.08.2019
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait.
Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate.
We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment.
The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait.BACKGROUNDIncreasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait.Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate.METHODSGraph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate.We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment.RESULTSWe show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment.The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased.CONCLUSIONThe mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait. Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate. We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment. The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait. Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate. We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment. The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. Background Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait. Methods Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate. Results We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment. Conclusion The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. Background Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait. Methods Graph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate. Results We show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment. Conclusion The mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. BackgroundIncreasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined when treatment may bias genetic associations with a quantitative trait.MethodsGraph theory and simulated data were used to explore the impact of drug prescriptions on (longitudinal) genetic effect estimates. Analytic derivations of longitudinal genetic effects are presented, accounting for the following scenarios: 1) treatment allocated independently of a genetic variant, 2) treatment that mediates the genetic effect, 3) treatment that modifies the genetic effect. We additionally evaluate treatment modelling strategies on bias, the root mean squared error (RMSE), coverage, and rejection rate.ResultsWe show that in the absence of treatment by gene effect modification or mediation, genetic effect estimates will be unbiased. In simulated data we found that conditional models accounting for treatment, confounding, and effect modification were generally unbiased with appropriate levels of confidence interval coverage. Ignoring the longitudinal nature of treatment prescription, however (e.g. because of incomplete records in longitudinal data), biased these conditional models to a similar degree (or worse) as simply ignoring treatment.ConclusionThe mere presence of (drug) treatment affecting a GWAS phenotype is insufficient to bias genetic associations with quantitative traits. While treatment may bias associations through effect modification and mediation, this might not occur frequently enough to warrant general concern at the presence of treated subjects in GWAS. Should treatment by gene effect modification or mediation be present however, current GWAS approaches attempting to adjust for treatment insufficiently account for the multivariable and longitudinal nature of treatment trajectories and hence genetic estimates may still be biased. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Denig, Petra Schmidt, Amand F. Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. Groenwold, Rolf H. H. Finan, Chris |
AuthorAffiliation | 4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands 1 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UNITED KINGDOM 2 Department of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UNITED KINGDOM – name: 3 Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands – name: 1 Institute of Cardiovascular Science, Faculty of Population Health, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom – name: 4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands – name: 2 Department of Cardiology, Division Heart and Lungs, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Amand F. orcidid: 0000-0003-1327-0424 surname: Schmidt fullname: Schmidt, Amand F. – sequence: 2 givenname: Hiddo J. L. surname: Heerspink fullname: Heerspink, Hiddo J. L. – sequence: 3 givenname: Petra surname: Denig fullname: Denig, Petra – sequence: 4 givenname: Chris surname: Finan fullname: Finan, Chris – sequence: 5 givenname: Rolf H. H. surname: Groenwold fullname: Groenwold, Rolf H. H. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31461463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNk9tq3DAQhk1JaQ7tG5TWECjtxW4tyZLtXBRCelpICfR4Kcby2KvglbaSXNq3r3bXCesQSrHA9uibX5qfmePkwFiDSfKUZHPCCvL62g7OQD9fx_A8o5TQrHqQHJGK0ZmgGTvY-z5Mjr2_zjLOSiEeJYeM5CIudpS8_bFEkzZu6NLgEMIKTfBprcGnHRoMWqU-DI1Gf5Z-wkZD0NakYJpUm4AO1Ob_cfKwhd7jk_F9knx7_-7rxcfZ5dWHxcX55UyJioYZFUyUrRCc19iWAFg1FW1ITTmrmCqJUNDUFEtERUTDakJKirwVvG6Bilaxk-T5TnfdWy9HA7yktCSVKEqRR2KxIxoL13Lt9ArcH2lBy23Auk6Ci0X1KPOCZZRTyNuyzOtWAQoBvK5FpTiPV4tab8bThnqFjYrOOOgnotMdo5eys7-kKAhjZREFXo4Czv4c0Ae50l5h34NBO2zvTXNORVFF9PQOen91I9VBLECb1sZz1UZUnvOqiBBnNFLze6j4NLjSKnZLq2N8kvBqkhCZgL9DB4P3cvHl8_-zV9-n7Is9donQh6W3_bBpGT8Fn-07fWvxTZtGIN8BylnvHba3CMnkZhpu7JKbaZDjNMS0sztpSodtB0dHdP_v5L8tARAJ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_pds_5437 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12920_023_01444_8 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/pds.3965 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 10.1002/we.1666 10.1038/nrg1521 10.1002/sim.2165 10.1197/jamia.M2128 10.1038/ng.3667 10.2337/dc11-1465 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science 2019 Schmidt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. 2019 Schmidt et al 2019 Schmidt et al |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 Public Library of Science – notice: 2019 Schmidt et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: 2019 Schmidt et al 2019 Schmidt et al |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7RV 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7X2 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ARAPS ATCPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI C1K CCPQU D1I DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB. KB0 KL. L6V LK8 M0K M0S M1P M7N M7P M7S NAPCQ P5Z P62 P64 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PTHSS PYCSY RC3 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0221209 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Opposing Viewpoints (Gale in Context) Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Immunology Abstracts Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Nucleic Acids Abstracts Virology and AIDS Abstracts Agricultural Science Collection Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Materials Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest Engineering Collection Biological Sciences Agricultural Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Database Materials Science Collection ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Engineering Collection (ProQuest) Environmental Science Collection Genetics Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Agricultural Science Database Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Nucleic Acids Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Engineering Database Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Agricultural Science Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Ecology Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Science Collection Entomology Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Environmental Science Database ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Materials Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Genetics Abstracts ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Materials Science Database ProQuest Materials Science Collection ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Materials Science & Engineering Collection Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Agricultural Science Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sciences (General) |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Treatment induced biases |
EISSN | 1932-6203 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2281967864 oai_doaj_org_article_4730252a4f884bfcae66a5bb69c55e9d PMC6713387 A597678532 31461463 10_1371_journal_pone_0221209 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United Kingdom United Kingdom--UK England Netherlands |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United Kingdom – name: Netherlands – name: England – name: United Kingdom--UK |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: British Heart Foundation grantid: PG/18/50/33837 |
GroupedDBID | --- 123 29O 2WC 53G 5VS 7RV 7X2 7X7 7XC 88E 8AO 8C1 8CJ 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAUCC AAWOE AAYXX ABDBF ABIVO ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACIHN ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHMBA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS APEBS ARAPS ATCPS BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI BWKFM CCPQU CITATION CS3 D1I D1J D1K DIK DU5 E3Z EAP EAS EBD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FPL FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO IEA IGS IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISE ISR ITC K6- KB. KQ8 L6V LK5 LK8 M0K M1P M48 M7P M7R M7S M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PATMY PDBOC PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS PV9 PYCSY RNS RPM RZL SV3 TR2 UKHRP WOQ WOW ~02 ~KM ADRAZ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF IPNFZ NPM PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB RIG BBORY PMFND 3V. 7QG 7QL 7QO 7SN 7SS 7T5 7TG 7TM 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. KL. M7N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI RC3 7X8 5PM PUEGO AAPBV ABPTK N95 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c692t-26368f6655bef8aae9d92d1b25393c816cadb2e8eec16d3b1182e5f65bfa26fc3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1932-6203 |
IngestDate | Sun Jul 02 11:03:51 EDT 2023 Wed Aug 27 01:27:32 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:14:35 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 03:39:18 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 11:18:08 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:00:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:17:53 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:24:50 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:46:32 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:20:47 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:42:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:12:34 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:52:35 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Language | English |
License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Creative Commons Attribution License |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c692t-26368f6655bef8aae9d92d1b25393c816cadb2e8eec16d3b1182e5f65bfa26fc3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. |
ORCID | 0000-0003-1327-0424 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1371/journal.pone.0221209 |
PMID | 31461463 |
PQID | 2281967864 |
PQPubID | 1436336 |
PageCount | e0221209 |
ParticipantIDs | plos_journals_2281967864 doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4730252a4f884bfcae66a5bb69c55e9d pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6713387 proquest_miscellaneous_2282452679 proquest_journals_2281967864 gale_infotracmisc_A597678532 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A597678532 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A597678532 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A597678532 gale_healthsolutions_A597678532 pubmed_primary_31461463 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0221209 crossref_citationtrail_10_1371_journal_pone_0221209 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2019-08-28 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-08-28 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2019 text: 2019-08-28 day: 28 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States – name: San Francisco – name: San Francisco, CA USA |
PublicationTitle | PloS one |
PublicationTitleAlternate | PLoS One |
PublicationYear | 2019 |
Publisher | Public Library of Science Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Publisher_xml | – name: Public Library of Science – name: Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
References | J Messner (pone.0221209.ref009) 2016; 8 WN Venables (pone.0221209.ref011) 2002 RS Patel (pone.0221209.ref002) 2015; 36 J Voorham (pone.0221209.ref012) 2007; 14 R Patel (pone.0221209.ref003) van Buuren S (pone.0221209.ref014) 2011; 45 GB Ehret (pone.0221209.ref005) 2016; 48 AF Schmidt (pone.0221209.ref007) 2016; 25 R Core Team (pone.0221209.ref008) 2017 JN Hirschhorn (pone.0221209.ref001) 2005; 6 JA Hirst (pone.0221209.ref015) 2012; 35 MD Tobin (pone.0221209.ref006) 2005; 24 DP Martono (pone.0221209.ref013) 2016 JW Messner (pone.0221209.ref010) 2014; 17 RS Patel (pone.0221209.ref004) 2019 |
References_xml | – volume: 25 start-page: 355 year: 2016 ident: pone.0221209.ref007 article-title: Tailoring treatments using treatment effect modification publication-title: Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety doi: 10.1002/pds.3965 – volume-title: Modern Applied Statistics With STechnometrics year: 2002 ident: pone.0221209.ref011 doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 – year: 2019 ident: pone.0221209.ref004 article-title: Association of Chromosome 9p21 with Subsequent Coronary Heart Disease Events: A GENIUS-CHD Study of Individual Participant Data publication-title: Circ Genom Precis Med – volume: 17 start-page: 1753 year: 2014 ident: pone.0221209.ref010 article-title: Probabilistic wind power forecasts with an inverse power curve transformation and censored regression publication-title: Wind Energy doi: 10.1002/we.1666 – volume: 8 start-page: 173 year: 2016 ident: pone.0221209.ref009 article-title: Heteroscedastic Censored and Truncated Regression with crch publication-title: R-Journal – year: 2016 ident: pone.0221209.ref013 article-title: Predictors of HbA1c levels in patients initiating metformin publication-title: Current Medical Research and Opinion – volume: 45 start-page: 1 year: 2011 ident: pone.0221209.ref014 article-title: mice: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in R publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software – volume: 36 start-page: 2674 year: 2015 ident: pone.0221209.ref002 article-title: The GENIUS-CHD consortium publication-title: European Heart Journal – ident: pone.0221209.ref003 article-title: Subsequent Event Risk in Individuals with Established Coronary Heart Disease: Design and Rationale of the GENIUS-CHD Consortium publication-title: Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine – volume: 6 start-page: 95 year: 2005 ident: pone.0221209.ref001 article-title: Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits publication-title: Nature Reviews Genetics doi: 10.1038/nrg1521 – volume: 24 start-page: 2911 year: 2005 ident: pone.0221209.ref006 article-title: Adjusting for treatment effects in studies of quantitative traits: Antihypertensive therapy and systolic blood pressure publication-title: Statistics in Medicine doi: 10.1002/sim.2165 – volume: 14 start-page: 349 year: 2007 ident: pone.0221209.ref012 article-title: Computerized Extraction of Information on the Quality of Diabetes Care from Free Text in Electronic Patient Records of General Practitioners publication-title: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2128 – volume: 48 start-page: 1171 year: 2016 ident: pone.0221209.ref005 article-title: The genetics of blood pressure regulation and its target organs from association studies in 342,415 individuals publication-title: Nat Genet doi: 10.1038/ng.3667 – year: 2017 ident: pone.0221209.ref008 – volume: 35 start-page: 446 year: 2012 ident: pone.0221209.ref015 article-title: Quantifying the effect of metformin treatment and dose on glycemic control publication-title: Diabetes Care doi: 10.2337/dc11-1465 |
SSID | ssj0053866 |
Score | 2.3181372 |
Snippet | Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We determined... Background Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We... BackgroundIncreasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We... Background Increasingly, genetic analyses are conducted using information from subjects with established disease, who often receive concomitant treatment. We... |
SourceID | plos doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | e0221209 |
SubjectTerms | Accounting Bias Biology and Life Sciences Blood pressure Cardiovascular disease Computer Simulation Confidence intervals Consortia Diabetes Drug interactions Drug Prescriptions Drug therapy Engineering and Technology Estimates Genes Genetic analysis Genetic aspects Genetic Diseases, Inborn - drug therapy Genetic Diseases, Inborn - epidemiology Genetic Diseases, Inborn - genetics Genetic diversity Genetic effects Genetic research Genetic variance Genetics Genome-Wide Association Study Genomes Genotype & phenotype Graph theory Heart Humans Longitude Mediation Medical treatment Medicine and Health Sciences Negotiating Pharmacogenomic Variants - genetics Pharmacy Phenotype Phenotypes Physiological aspects Quantitative trait loci Quantitative Trait Loci - genetics Regression analysis Rejection rate Research and Analysis Methods Root-mean-square errors Studies Trajectory analysis Type 2 diabetes |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELbQnrggyqtLWzAICTikZf1KzK08qoJUkICi3izbsUulKrva7P7_ztjeqEGVyoHrepJsvpmxPfHMN4S8wjXIanCkum19JVoGLuU9r1o540LBHsKmXocn39Txqfh6Js-utfrCnLBMD5yBOxBggkwyK2LTCBe9DUpZ6ZzSXsqgW5x94XmbYCrPweDFSpVCOV7PDope9hfzLuzDqoUFo6OFKPH1D7PyZHE572_acv6dOXltKTq6T-6VPSQ9zP99i9wJ3QOyVby0p28KlfTbh-QTzLUdbZfrczpklPfUXdieguFg_SLtcyLhe3qSmnaAmqjtWoo0Estc9PCInB59_vXxuCp9EyqvNFtVTHHVRKWkdCE21gJKmrUzxyTX3Dcz5W3rWGhC8DPVcocxRpBRSRctU9Hzx2TSAVLbhEbdgMrkOweBoAhC6kTm0ngbNQ_C8SnhGxCNL6Ti2Nvi0qSTshqCi4yJQehNgX5KquGqRSbVuEX-A-pnkEVK7PQDGIophmJuM5QpeY7aNbm-dHBscwghFazYkrMpeZkkkBajw7ybc7vue_Pl--9_EPr5YyT0ugjFOcDhbal1gHdCuq2R5O5IEpzbj4a30RY3qPSG4cEnjCkBV27s8-bhF8Mw3hRz6bowXycZPG5XNeD6JJvzgCzHNu9CgV7rkaGPoB-PdBd_Eiu5Sp876qf_Q1c75C5sTDV-u2fNLpmsluuwB5u_lXuW_PwKc_dX5g priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Jb9QwFLZguHBBlK1DCxiEBBzSNt6ScEFlGQpSQQKKerO8ZVqpSobJzP_nPccTCKqA6_glynxvtf0WQp6iDzIVKFLhvcuEZ6BSzvHMy5wLBTGEibMOjz-poxPx8VSepgO3LqVVbmxiNNS-dXhGvs_wxgcsqxKvFj8ynBqFt6tphMZVci0HT4MpXeXs_cYSgy4rlcrleJHvJ-7sLdom7IHvwrLRkTuKXfsH2zxZXLTdZYHnn_mTvzmk2U1yI0WS9LBn_Ra5EppbZCvpakefp4bSL26Tt2BxG-qX6zkd8so7as9NR0F8sIqRdn064Ut6HEd3ALOoaTzFZhLLvvThDjmZvfv25ihL0xMypyq2ypjiqqyVktKGujQmVL5iPrdM8oq7MlfOeMtCGYLLlecWdxpB1kra2jBVO36XTBpAapvQuiqBcfLAwnZQBCGr2NKldKaueBCWTwnfgKhdai2OEy4udLwvK2CL0WOiEXqdoJ-SbHhq0bfW-Af9a-TPQIuNseMP7XKuk55pARaLSWZEXZbC1s4EpYy0VlVOSoBgSh4hd3VfZTqotz6EjRVIl-RsSp5ECmyO0WD2zdysu05_-Pz9P4i-fhkRPUtEdQtwOJMqHuA_YdOtEeXuiBJU3I2Wt1EWN6h0-pcywJMb-bx8-fGwjC_FjLomtOtIg5fuqgBc7_XiPCDLcdi7UMDXYiToI-jHK835WexNruKhR3H_75-1Q65D4Fnh2Twrd8lktVyHBxDcrezDqME_AfnWTvI priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | When drug treatments bias genetic studies: Mediation and interaction |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31461463 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2281967864 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2282452679 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6713387 https://doaj.org/article/4730252a4f884bfcae66a5bb69c55e9d http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221209 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1daxNBcGlTkL6I9aunNZ4iqA8XvP26O0GkrYlVSJVqSt6O3b29WAiXmEtAX_ztzux94EmKvuxDZvYg87EzszsfhDxDG6QSUKQoy0zAMwoqZQwLMhEyLsGHUG7W4fhcnk34x6mY7pBmZmtNwHJraIfzpCar-eDH959vQeHfuKkNUdhsGiwXhR2ATcJy0F2yB7YpwpkGY96-K4B2S1kX0F23c5_cYDjsmkvWsVWupX97cPeW80W5zSv9O7nyD2s1ukVu1m6mf1zJxQHZscVtclArcum_qLtNv7xD3sFxXPjZajPz26Tz0tdXqvRBtrDE0S-rXMPX_tjN9QBO-qrIfOw0sarqIu6SyWj49fQsqEcrBEYmdB1QyWScSymEtnmslE2yhGahpoIlzMShNCrT1MbWmlBmTGMYYkUuhc4Vlblh90ivAKIdEj9PYuCqeKUhVuSWi8T1e4mNyhNmuWYeYQ0RU1P3HcfxF_PUPaZFEH9UNEmRC2nNBY8E7a5l1XfjH_gnyJ8WF7tmux8Wq1laK2HK4TijgiqexzHXuVFWSiW0lokRAkjgkcfI3bQqQW11Pz2GqAuMumDUI08dBnbOKDA1Z6Y2ZZl--HT5H0hfLjpIz2ukfAHkMKouh4D_hB25OphHHUzQf9MBH6IsNlQpU4pvowCTHHY28rkd_KQF40cx3a6wi43DwRd5GQFd71fi3FK2UQ6PRB1B75C-CymuvrnG5dLdiEQPrv3mQ7IPDmmCd_Y0PiK99WpjH4HTt9Z9shtNI1jj0xDX0fs-2TsZnn--6LtrlL7Tc1x_DX8DbP1azA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELbKcoBLRXl1S6EGgYBDWtavJEgIFcqyS7tFghb1FmzHWSpVybLZFeJP8RuZcR4QVAGXXuNJlHwefzOO50HIQ7RBOoaFFKapDUTKYElZy4NUDrhQ4ENo3-twcqhGx-LdiTxZIT-aXBgMq2w40RN1Wlj8R77D8MQHmFWJl7OvAXaNwtPVpoVGpRb77vs32LKVL8Z7ML-PGBu-OXo9CuquAoFVMVsETHEVZUpJaVwWae3iNGbpwDDJY26jgbI6NcxFztmBSrlBD9zJTEmTaaYyy-G5l8hlwcGSY2b68G3D_MAdStXpeTwc7NTasD0rcrcNthLTVDvmz3cJaG1Bb3ZWlOc5un_Ga_5mAIfXyGrtudLdStXWyIrLr5O1mhtK-qQuYP30BtkDhs9pOl9OaRvHXlJzqksK6opZk7Sswhef04lvFQLKQXWeUixeMa9SLW6S4wvB9Rbp5YDUOqFZHIGiyGcGtp_CCRn7EjKR1VnMnTC8T3gDYmLrUubYUeMs8edzIWxpKkwShD6poe-ToL1rVpXy-If8K5yfVhYLcfsLxXya1Os6EcCQTDItsigSJrPaKaWlMSq2UgIEfbKFs5tUWa0tnSS7sJEDbZac9ckDL4HFOHKM9pnqZVkm4_ef_kPo44eO0ONaKCsADqvrDAv4Jizy1ZHc7EgCpdjO8DrqYoNKmfxafHBno5_nD99vh_GhGMGXu2LpZfCQX4WA6-1KnVtkOTaXFwrmNewoegf67kh--sXXQlf-J0u48ffX2iJXRkeTg-RgfLh_h1wFpzfGcwEWbZLeYr50d8GxXJh7fjVT8vmi6eMnUGeNPA |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELdGkRAvE-NrHYMZBAIeslI7dhIkhMZKtTI2EGNob8F2nDJpSkrTCvGv8ddx5ziBoAl42Wt8iZKff3c-x_dByENcg1QCihRlmQnCjIFKGcODTAx5KMGHUK7X4cGh3DsO35yIkxXyo8mFwbDKxiY6Q52VBv-RDxie-IBlleEg92ER70fjl7OvAXaQwpPWpp1GTZF9-_0bbN-qF5MRzPUjxsavP-7uBb7DQGBkwhYBk1zGuZRCaJvHStkkS1g21EzwhJt4KI3KNLOxtWYoM67RG7cil0LnisnccHjuJXI54lGMOhbvtuElYEek9Kl6PBoOPDO2Z2Vht2HdxJTVzlLoOga060JvdlZW5zm9f8Zu_rYYjq-RVe_F0p2admtkxRbXyZq3ExV94otZP71BRmDtC5rNl1PaxrRXVJ-qigJ1MYOSVnUo43N64NqGAFGoKjKKhSzmddrFTXJ8IbjeIr0CkFonNE9iII14pmErGtpQJK6cTGxUnnAbat4nvAExNb6sOXbXOEvdWV0E25sakxShTz30fRK0d83qsh7_kH-F89PKYlFud6GcT1Ov42kI1pIJpsI8jkOdG2WlVEJrmRghAII-2cLZTesM19a0pDuwqQNmC8765IGTwMIcBVJ8qpZVlU7effoPoaMPHaHHXigvAQ6jfLYFfBMW_OpIbnYkwbyYzvA6crFBpUp_KSLc2fDz_OH77TA-FKP5ClsunQwe-MsIcL1d07lFlmOj-VDCvEYdoneg744Up19cXXTpfrhEG39_rS1yBQxH-nZyuH-HXAX_N8EjAhZvkt5ivrR3wcdc6HtOmSn5fNHW4ydV-pE9 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When+drug+treatments+bias+genetic+studies%3A+Mediation+and+interaction&rft.jtitle=PloS+one&rft.au=Schmidt%2C+Amand+F&rft.au=Heerspink%2C+Hiddo+J+L&rft.au=Denig%2C+Petra&rft.au=Finan%2C+Chris&rft.date=2019-08-28&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0221209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0221209&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F31461463&rft.externalDocID=31461463 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1932-6203&client=summon |