Effectiveness of struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping for recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from anaerobic digestate: a systematic review
Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural-urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge...
Saved in:
| Published in | Environmental evidence Vol. 9; no. 1; pp. 1 - 27 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central Ltd
11.11.2020
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 2047-2382 2047-2382 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00211-x |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural-urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment. Methods We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: 'title and abstract' and 'full text'. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies. Review findings The review included 30 studies on struvite precipitation and 8 studies on ammonia stripping. Both pH and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio were found to have a clear influence on the effectiveness of struvite precipitation process (and thus nutrient removal rates). The response to pH was found to be non-linear, resembling a bell curve with a maximum around pH 9.5. Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio was found to have a positive effect on removal up to a ratio as high as 4:1. However, it should be noted that high removal efficiencies were sometimes achieved at a ratio as low as 1:1 as well. Although the effects of pH and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio were clear, the model developed could not accurately predict removal based on these two parameters alone. Studies on ammonia stripping were relatively heterogeneous. Due to the small size of the evidence base, and the heterogeneity between studies, no conclusions are presented regarding the influence of different process parameters on the outcome of ammonia stripping. Conclusions In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. Keywords: Circular economy, Wastewater treatment, Manure management |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural-urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment. Methods We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: 'title and abstract' and 'full text'. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies. Review findings The review included 30 studies on struvite precipitation and 8 studies on ammonia stripping. Both pH and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio were found to have a clear influence on the effectiveness of struvite precipitation process (and thus nutrient removal rates). The response to pH was found to be non-linear, resembling a bell curve with a maximum around pH 9.5. Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio was found to have a positive effect on removal up to a ratio as high as 4:1. However, it should be noted that high removal efficiencies were sometimes achieved at a ratio as low as 1:1 as well. Although the effects of pH and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio were clear, the model developed could not accurately predict removal based on these two parameters alone. Studies on ammonia stripping were relatively heterogeneous. Due to the small size of the evidence base, and the heterogeneity between studies, no conclusions are presented regarding the influence of different process parameters on the outcome of ammonia stripping. Conclusions In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. Keywords: Circular economy, Wastewater treatment, Manure management A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural-urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment. We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: 'title and abstract' and 'full text'. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies. In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO.sub.4 ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. Abstract Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural–urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment. Methods We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: ‘title and abstract’ and ‘full text’. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies. Review findings The review included 30 studies on struvite precipitation and 8 studies on ammonia stripping. Both pH and Mg:PO4 ratio were found to have a clear influence on the effectiveness of struvite precipitation process (and thus nutrient removal rates). The response to pH was found to be non-linear, resembling a bell curve with a maximum around pH 9.5. Mg:PO4 ratio was found to have a positive effect on removal up to a ratio as high as 4:1. However, it should be noted that high removal efficiencies were sometimes achieved at a ratio as low as 1:1 as well. Although the effects of pH and Mg:PO4 ratio were clear, the model developed could not accurately predict removal based on these two parameters alone. Studies on ammonia stripping were relatively heterogeneous. Due to the small size of the evidence base, and the heterogeneity between studies, no conclusions are presented regarding the influence of different process parameters on the outcome of ammonia stripping. Conclusions In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO4 ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. BACKGROUND: A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural–urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment. METHODS: We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: ‘title and abstract’ and ‘full text’. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies. REVIEW FINDINGS: The review included 30 studies on struvite precipitation and 8 studies on ammonia stripping. Both pH and Mg:PO₄ ratio were found to have a clear influence on the effectiveness of struvite precipitation process (and thus nutrient removal rates). The response to pH was found to be non-linear, resembling a bell curve with a maximum around pH 9.5. Mg:PO₄ ratio was found to have a positive effect on removal up to a ratio as high as 4:1. However, it should be noted that high removal efficiencies were sometimes achieved at a ratio as low as 1:1 as well. Although the effects of pH and Mg:PO₄ ratio were clear, the model developed could not accurately predict removal based on these two parameters alone. Studies on ammonia stripping were relatively heterogeneous. Due to the small size of the evidence base, and the heterogeneity between studies, no conclusions are presented regarding the influence of different process parameters on the outcome of ammonia stripping. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO₄ ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. Background: A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to agriculture from organic waste streams is necessary for increased rural-urban sustainability. Anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes is widely applied to stabilize the substrate and capture some of its energetic value via biogas production. Anaerobic digestate is a concentrated source of nutrients to which nutrient recovery technologies can be applied. By combining anaerobic digestion and nutrient recovery technologies on the digestate, both energy and nutrient recovery can be achieved. Two promising technologies that could increase nutrient recycling from different types of wastewater are struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping. This review examined the effectiveness of these ecotechnologies for the recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus from anaerobic digestate with the aim of reducing the impact of waste on the environment.Methods: We searched for academic and grey literature published after 2013. Searches were performed in 5 bibliographic databases in English, in the search engine Google Scholar in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish, and across a range of organisational websites in English, Swedish, Finnish and Polish. Eligibility screening was conducted at two levels: 'title and abstract' and 'full text'. Included eligible studies were subject to a critical appraisal that assessed external and internal study validity. We extracted information on study characteristics, intervention, comparators, effect modifiers, and measured outcomes. Data synthesis included narrative synthesis of each study of sufficient validity. We performed quantitative synthesis on a subset of studies.Review findings: The review included 30 studies on struvite precipitation and 8 studies on ammonia stripping. Both pH and Mg:PO4 ratio were found to have a clear influence on the effectiveness of struvite precipitation process (and thus nutrient removal rates). The response to pH was found to be non-linear, resembling a bell curve with a maximum around pH 9.5. Mg:PO4 ratio was found to have a positive effect on removal up to a ratio as high as 4:1. However, it should be noted that high removal efficiencies were sometimes achieved at a ratio as low as 1:1 as well. Although the effects of pH and Mg:PO4 ratio were clear, the model developed could not accurately predict removal based on these two parameters alone. Studies on ammonia stripping were relatively heterogeneous. Due to the small size of the evidence base, and the heterogeneity between studies, no conclusions are presented regarding the influence of different process parameters on the outcome of ammonia stripping.Conclusions: In conclusion, when performed under the right conditions (i.e. pH around 9.5 and Mg:PO4 ratio of at least 1:1), available evidence suggests that struvite precipitation is an effective technology for the recovery of nutrients from the liquid phase of anaerobic digestate. The evidence base is limited for ammonia stripping. We provided suggestions of which data to report in future studies. |
| ArticleNumber | 27 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Ahlström, Marcus Lorick, Dag Macura, Biljana Harder, Robin Grimvall, Anders |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dag orcidid: 0000-0002-9385-3103 surname: Lorick fullname: Lorick, Dag – sequence: 2 givenname: Biljana surname: Macura fullname: Macura, Biljana – sequence: 3 givenname: Marcus surname: Ahlström fullname: Ahlström, Marcus – sequence: 4 givenname: Anders surname: Grimvall fullname: Grimvall, Anders – sequence: 5 givenname: Robin surname: Harder fullname: Harder, Robin |
| BackLink | https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-50962$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index https://res.slu.se/id/publ/109248$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
| BookMark | eNp9k91q3DAQhU1JoWmaF-iVoVAailNJtmy5d0uatguBQv9uhSyPdrXYlivZm93n6At3vJuSONDaDBLDd46kYeZ5dNK5DqLoJSWXlIr8XaBpwUlCGAZhlCa7J9EpI1mRsFSwkwf7Z9F5CBuCn-CCEXIa_b42BvRgt9BBCLEzcRj8uLUDxL0HbXs7qMG6LlZdHau2dZ1VE2L73nar2DgfI-a24PeTuF-7gOHHcBB0dvBuBV1svGsxo8C7yuq4tisIaAzvY3TbhwFaPEWj1dbC7YvoqVFNgPO79Sz68fH6-9Xn5ObLp-XV4ibReUmHhGkhCkh1xdM0hSwXZa14mlFVMAZVlgnOciQ4IYZAXom8grrKysqoskhLjLNoefStndrI3ttW-b10yspDwvmVVB6v1YAsdFXVFaeMpiQjtCxTrYgxjHOhhao5el0evcIt9GM1cwvNWCk_LTKApKRkmUDB238KPtifi8Px3kpOypwh_eZI9979GrF2srVBQ9OoDtwYJMvTPKNZyUtEXz1CN270HRZSsixnlGeCFffUSuHzbGfc4JWeTOUCnVLC80Lcv2pG4V9DazV2obGYnwkuZgJkBtgNKzWGIJffvs7Z1w_YNahmWAfXjFO7hTkojqD2LgQPRuq7rsTb2AYrKqc5kMc5kDgH8jAHcodS9kj6t87_Ef0BRIcMsQ |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_desal_2024_118266 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2021_147098 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2025_114743 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2021_125131 crossref_primary_10_15625_2525_2518_18070 crossref_primary_10_3389_frsus_2023_1338380 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00267_021_01537_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_watres_2021_117596 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_4c00479 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_159283 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2024_05_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2023_110901 crossref_primary_10_3390_nitrogen3020020 crossref_primary_10_1002_aic_17869 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_3c01470 crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2022_832841 crossref_primary_10_1039_D4EW00043A crossref_primary_10_3389_fchem_2022_974223 crossref_primary_10_3389_fenvs_2023_1116053 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_024_07617_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_desal_2022_116115 crossref_primary_10_3390_s22051857 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2024_107986 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms12081591 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12524_022_01663_z crossref_primary_10_21272_jes_2022_9_1__h1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s43538_024_00326_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2023_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_022_01797_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhazmat_2024_135505 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_021_00235_x crossref_primary_10_3390_w15213817 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2024_131753 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13399_023_04639_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cej_2024_150834 crossref_primary_10_1002_wer_10853 crossref_primary_10_1021_jacsau_4c00054 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jece_2025_115584 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2021_112041 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12649_023_02251_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mcat_2021_111941 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jes_2024_03_010 crossref_primary_10_3390_w16071003 crossref_primary_10_1557_s43578_023_01108_4 crossref_primary_10_2166_wst_2021_299 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cscee_2025_101200 crossref_primary_10_1002_sae2_70018 crossref_primary_10_1080_21655979_2023_2252191 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_167193 crossref_primary_10_3390_en15249340 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chemosphere_2023_139196 crossref_primary_10_1556_112_2022_00124 crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy14071591 crossref_primary_10_1007_s44169_022_00010_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jwpe_2024_106206 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsestengg_3c00043 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seppur_2022_122690 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envres_2025_120865 crossref_primary_10_3390_su14031082 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_psep_2023_09_059 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wri_2025_100285 crossref_primary_10_1089_ees_2024_0116 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biortech_2022_127957 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_resconrec_2021_105842 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cesys_2024_100235 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rser_2024_114938 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_spc_2025_02_019 crossref_primary_10_3390_membranes12060572 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1070427222040164 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wasman_2022_07_013 crossref_primary_10_3390_membranes13030297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seppur_2022_122459 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seppur_2023_123602 crossref_primary_10_3390_en14238149 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1002/jctb.4459 10.1089/ees.2018.0065 10.1186/s13750-019-0173-3 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.116 10.6084/m9.figshare.5897272.v4 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.302 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.093 10.1080/19443994.2012.715074 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.129 10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042018 10.3390/su3102027 10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.065 10.1080/19443994.2016.1175972 10.1080/09593330.2012.720718 10.3390/w5031262 10.1155/2018/3181087 10.2166/wst.2016.527 10.1016/j.jes.2017.11.029 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115601 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.012 10.12783/issn.1544-8053/13/S2/5 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115433 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.172 10.1186/s13068-018-1102-3 10.1038/461472a 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.048 10.2175/106143012X13560205145253 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90209-6 10.2166/wpt.2013.013 10.1007/s11356-014-3392-8 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.369 10.2166/wst.2014.033 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.054 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.019 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.030 10.1073/pnas.0913658107 10.1111/1365-2664.12089 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.037 10.1126/science.1259855 10.1007/s40095-018-0283-7 10.1021/acs.est.5b01931 10.1080/19443994.2015.1035342 10.1146/annurev-environ-010213-113300 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.117 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.10.007 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.258 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.026 10.1007/s10113-018-1308-8 10.1186/s13750-020-00207-7 10.5713/ajas.14.0679 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.002 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v20n2.71184 10.1504/IJETM.2017.086463 10.1080/19443994.2014.1001794 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| CorporateAuthor | Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION ISR ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA ATCPS AZQEC BENPR BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO GNUQQ HCIFZ PATMY PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PYCSY 7S9 L.6 ADTPV AOWAS D8T ZZAVC DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00211-x |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Environmental Science Collection AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles SWEPUB Freely available online SwePub Articles full text DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Environmental Science Collection ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central Korea Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection Environmental Science Database ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | AGRICOLA Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Environmental Sciences Agriculture |
| EISSN | 2047-2382 |
| EndPage | 27 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_7cbbdb512130401993ca0ff2558c8ad5 oai_slubar_slu_se_109248 oai_DiVA_org_ri_50962 A641305678 10_1186_s13750_020_00211_x |
| GeographicLocations | Sweden |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Sweden |
| GroupedDBID | 0R~ 2XV 5VS 7XC 8FE 8FH AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ACGFS ADBBV ADUKV AEGXH AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH ATCPS BAPOH BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC C6C CCPQU CITATION EBLON EBS EDH GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ IAO IEP IHR IHW ISR KQ8 M~E OK1 PATMY PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PROAC PYCSY RBZ RNS ROL RSV SEV SOJ PMFND ABUWG AZQEC DWQXO GNUQQ PKEHL PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7S9 L.6 2VQ 4.4 ADTPV AHSBF AOWAS EJD H13 IPNFZ RIG RPM D8T ZZAVC PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c691t-2c887e3cb5333e4689da5341a722eb448526887500f0e6b86bedb49bfa9739973 |
| IEDL.DBID | DOA |
| ISSN | 2047-2382 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:16:19 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 06:53:55 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 07:33:16 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:34:58 EDT 2025 Mon Jun 30 11:42:47 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:14:29 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:22:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:50:06 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:19:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:17:21 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:15 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Language | English |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c691t-2c887e3cb5333e4689da5341a722eb448526887500f0e6b86bedb49bfa9739973 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9385-3103 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/7cbbdb512130401993ca0ff2558c8ad5 |
| PQID | 2462154827 |
| PQPubID | 2040243 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7cbbdb512130401993ca0ff2558c8ad5 swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_109248 swepub_primary_oai_DiVA_org_ri_50962 proquest_miscellaneous_2636414959 proquest_journals_2462154827 gale_infotracmisc_A641305678 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A641305678 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A641305678 gale_healthsolutions_A641305678 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13750_020_00211_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s13750_020_00211_x |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-11-11 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-11-11 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 11 year: 2020 text: 2020-11-11 day: 11 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Environmental evidence |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | D Crutchik (211_CR60) 2017; 75 X Li (211_CR68) 2016; 544 T Zhang (211_CR55) 2014; 40 C Farrow (211_CR47) 2017; 20 J Rockström (211_CR14) 2009; 461 J Wang (211_CR54) 2018; 70 M Shanshan (211_CR65) 2016; 13 NR Haddaway (211_CR26) 2017 Y Liu (211_CR58) 2017; 5 N Morales (211_CR66) 2013; 5 KC van Dijk (211_CR5) 2016; 542 211_CR57 K Barquet (211_CR69) 2020; 171 211_CR17 D Cordell (211_CR4) 2014; 39 ML McCrackin (211_CR9) 2018; 18 R Harder (211_CR10) 2020; 175 D Bolzonella (211_CR62) 2018; 216 MM Rahman (211_CR19) 2014; 7 R Connan (211_CR33) 2018; 203 K Venkiteshwaran (211_CR23) 2018; 644 B Macura (211_CR27) 2019; 8 J Peccia (211_CR13) 2015; 49 DE Carey (211_CR21) 2016; 215 211_CR25 W Zheng (211_CR44) 2014; 23 A Muhmood (211_CR20) 2019; 230 211_CR29 H Lin (211_CR51) 2018; 58 211_CR28 Y Jiang (211_CR49) 2018; 11 D Kim (211_CR50) 2016; 57 C Ledda (211_CR64) 2013; 47 D Hidalgo (211_CR67) 2016; 57 J Ma (211_CR24) 2013 C Garcia-Belinchón (211_CR34) 2013; 8 S Kalam (211_CR37) 2015 L Castro (211_CR46) 2018; 20 R Sharp (211_CR42) 2013; 85 H Huang (211_CR48) 2014; 254 S Yeoman (211_CR12) 1988; 49 E Lee (211_CR45) 2015; 28 T Hastie (211_CR30) 1990 H Huang (211_CR35) 2015; 102 211_CR31 A Muhmood (211_CR52) 2018; 635 J Bohdziewicz (211_CR32) 2013; 51 H Zhang (211_CR56) 2018; 36 M Cerrillo (211_CR59) 2015; 90 D Cordell (211_CR3) 2011; 3 B Macura (211_CR18) 2019; 8 Y Qin (211_CR41) 2018; 108 J Liu (211_CR2) 2010; 107 L Karabegovic (211_CR38) 2013; 34 A Muhmood (211_CR40) 2019; 652 K Ghyselbrecht (211_CR63) 2018; 9 AL Shober (211_CR8) 2018 O Lahav (211_CR39) 2013; 108 LD Xavier (211_CR43) 2014; 69 J Mateo-Sagasta (211_CR11) 2015 MA Boehler (211_CR61) 2015; 22 G Jia (211_CR36) 2017; 147 DL Jones (211_CR7) 2013; 50 CJ Dawson (211_CR1) 2011; 36 A Buckwell (211_CR6) 2016 Y Shen (211_CR53) 2016; 57 W Steffen (211_CR15) 2015; 347 L Kinidi (211_CR22) 2018; 2018 NR Haddaway (211_CR16) 2019; 8 |
| References_xml | – volume: 90 start-page: 1135 issue: 6 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR59 publication-title: J Chem Technol Biotechnol doi: 10.1002/jctb.4459 – volume: 36 start-page: 102 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR56 publication-title: Environ Eng Sci doi: 10.1089/ees.2018.0065 – volume: 8 start-page: 29 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 211_CR27 publication-title: Environ Evid doi: 10.1186/s13750-019-0173-3 – volume: 147 start-page: 297 year: 2017 ident: 211_CR36 publication-title: J Clean Product doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.116 – volume-title: Wastewater year: 2015 ident: 211_CR11 – year: 2017 ident: 211_CR26 publication-title: Version 1.0 doi: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5897272.v4 – volume: 652 start-page: 623 year: 2019 ident: 211_CR40 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.302 – volume: 215 start-page: 186 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR21 publication-title: Biores Technol doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.093 – volume: 51 start-page: 366 issue: 1–3 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR32 publication-title: Desalin Water Treatment doi: 10.1080/19443994.2012.715074 – volume: 635 start-page: 1 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR52 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.129 – volume: 108 start-page: 042018 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR41 publication-title: IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/108/4/042018 – volume: 3 start-page: 2027 year: 2011 ident: 211_CR3 publication-title: Sustainability doi: 10.3390/su3102027 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 211_CR18 publication-title: Environ Evid doi: 10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z – volume: 5 start-page: 3949 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 211_CR58 publication-title: J Environ Chem Eng doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2017.07.065 – volume: 57 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR50 publication-title: Desalin Water Treat doi: 10.1080/19443994.2016.1175972 – volume: 34 start-page: 871 issue: 5–8 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR38 publication-title: Environ Technol doi: 10.1080/09593330.2012.720718 – volume: 5 start-page: 1262 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR66 publication-title: Water doi: 10.3390/w5031262 – volume: 2018 start-page: 14 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR22 publication-title: Int J Chem Eng doi: 10.1155/2018/3181087 – ident: 211_CR28 – volume: 75 start-page: 609 issue: 3–4 year: 2017 ident: 211_CR60 publication-title: Water Sci Technol doi: 10.2166/wst.2016.527 – volume: 70 start-page: 144 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR54 publication-title: J Environ Sci doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.11.029 – volume: 175 start-page: 115601 year: 2020 ident: 211_CR10 publication-title: Water Res doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.115601 – volume: 36 start-page: S14 year: 2011 ident: 211_CR1 publication-title: Food Policy doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.012 – volume: 13 start-page: S23 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR65 publication-title: J Residu Sci Technol doi: 10.12783/issn.1544-8053/13/S2/5 – volume: 8 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 211_CR16 publication-title: Environ Evid doi: 10.1186/s13750-018-0145-z – volume: 171 start-page: 115433 year: 2020 ident: 211_CR69 publication-title: Water Res doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115433 – volume-title: Review of emerging nutrient recovery technologies for farm-based anaerobic digesters and other renewable energy systems year: 2013 ident: 211_CR24 – ident: 211_CR57 – volume: 544 start-page: 774 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR68 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.172 – volume: 11 start-page: 101 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR49 publication-title: Biotechnol Biofuels doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1102-3 – volume: 461 start-page: 472 year: 2009 ident: 211_CR14 publication-title: Nature doi: 10.1038/461472a – ident: 211_CR25 – ident: 211_CR29 – volume: 542 start-page: 1078 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR5 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.048 – volume: 85 start-page: 675 issue: 8 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR42 publication-title: Water Environ Res doi: 10.2175/106143012X13560205145253 – volume: 40 start-page: 29 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR55 publication-title: Environ Prot Eng – volume: 49 start-page: 183 year: 1988 ident: 211_CR12 publication-title: Environ Pollut doi: 10.1016/0269-7491(88)90209-6 – volume: 8 start-page: 119 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR34 publication-title: Water Pract Technol doi: 10.2166/wpt.2013.013 – volume: 22 start-page: 7295 issue: 10 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR61 publication-title: Environ Sci Pollut Res doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3392-8 – volume: 644 start-page: 661 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR23 publication-title: Sci Total Environ doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.369 – volume: 69 start-page: 1546 issue: 7 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR43 publication-title: Water Sci Technol doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.033 – volume: 254 start-page: 418 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR48 publication-title: Chem Eng J doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.054 – volume: 58 start-page: 148 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR51 publication-title: J Ind Eng Chem doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.09.019 – ident: 211_CR31 – volume: 230 start-page: 1 year: 2019 ident: 211_CR20 publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.030 – volume-title: A pilot scale study of combining struvite precipitation with UniBAR-anammox process as a sustainable unified solution for managing nutrients in centrate year: 2015 ident: 211_CR37 – volume: 107 start-page: 8035 issue: 17 year: 2010 ident: 211_CR2 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913658107 – volume: 50 start-page: 851 issue: 4 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR7 publication-title: J Appl Ecol doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12089 – volume: 47 start-page: 6157 issue: 16 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR64 publication-title: Water Res doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.07.037 – volume-title: Nutrient Recovery and Reuse (NRR) in European agriculture: a review of the issues, opportunities, and actions year: 2016 ident: 211_CR6 – volume: 347 start-page: 1259855 issue: 6223 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR15 publication-title: Science doi: 10.1126/science.1259855 – volume: 9 start-page: 447 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR63 publication-title: Int J Energy Environ Eng doi: 10.1007/s40095-018-0283-7 – volume-title: Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences year: 2018 ident: 211_CR8 – volume: 49 start-page: 8271 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR13 publication-title: Environ Sci Technol doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b01931 – volume: 57 start-page: 10361 issue: 22 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR53 publication-title: Desalin Water Treat doi: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1035342 – volume: 39 start-page: 161 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR4 publication-title: Annu Rev Environ Resour doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-010213-113300 – volume: 23 start-page: 756 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR44 publication-title: Fresenius Environ Bull – volume: 102 start-page: 437 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR35 publication-title: J Clean Product doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.117 – volume: 7 start-page: 139 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 211_CR19 publication-title: Arab J Chem doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2013.10.007 – volume: 203 start-page: 559 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR33 publication-title: J Clean Product doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.258 – volume: 216 start-page: 111 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR62 publication-title: J Environ Manage doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.026 – volume: 18 start-page: 1843 issue: 6 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR9 publication-title: Reg Environ Change doi: 10.1007/s10113-018-1308-8 – ident: 211_CR17 doi: 10.1186/s13750-020-00207-7 – volume-title: Generalized additive model year: 1990 ident: 211_CR30 – volume: 28 start-page: 1053 year: 2015 ident: 211_CR45 publication-title: Asian-Austral J Anim Sci doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0679 – volume: 108 start-page: 103 year: 2013 ident: 211_CR39 publication-title: Sep Purif Technol doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2013.02.002 – volume: 20 start-page: 78 year: 2018 ident: 211_CR46 publication-title: Revista Colombiana de Biotecnología doi: 10.15446/rev.colomb.biote.v20n2.71184 – volume: 20 start-page: 87 year: 2017 ident: 211_CR47 publication-title: Int J Environ Technol Manage doi: 10.1504/IJETM.2017.086463 – volume: 57 start-page: 2626 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 211_CR67 publication-title: Desalin Water Treat doi: 10.1080/19443994.2014.1001794 |
| SSID | ssj0000858200 |
| Score | 2.4498482 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of... A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of nutrients back to... BACKGROUND: A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of... Background: A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of... Abstract Background A regular supply of nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus to agriculture is needed for global food security, and increased recycling of... |
| SourceID | doaj swepub proquest gale crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Enrichment Source Index Database |
| StartPage | 1 |
| SubjectTerms | Agricultural production Agricultural wastes Agriculture Alternative energy sources Ammonia Anaerobic digestion Biogas Chemical precipitation Circular economy Comparators energy Energy recovery Environmental aspects Environmental Sciences Eutrophication Fertilizers Food security gas production (biological) Heterogeneity Internet Liquid phases liquids magnesium ammonium phosphate Manure management Manures Miljövetenskap Mineral reserves Nitrogen Nutrient removal Nutrients Organic farming Organic wastes pH effects Phosphorus Process parameters Purification Recycling Recycling (Waste, etc.) Search engines Sewage Sewage sludge Sludge Sludge digestion Stakeholders Stripping Struvite Substrates Sustainable agriculture Sweden Synthesis Systematic review Vattenbehandling Waste management Waste streams Wastewater Wastewater treatment Water Treatment Websites |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3da9UwFA-6veiDzOmwOjXKwAcp62ea-iJ3escUHDKd7C0kaXp3YbS12R3z7_Af9pw0t6Mqe7hcaE9KmvOdnvMLIXumUio3ILygTFmYpcqEKlZVyOuylibSaWlwH_LLMTs6zT6f5Wd-w836ssq1TXSGumo17pHvJxlLMLxOivfdzxBPjcKvq_4IjbtkE0wwBwnfPJgffz0Zd1kgoAAXF627ZTjbt3EKTjLErAn9WxxeTzySA-7_1zz_BSTqnM_hFnngo0Y6G9j8kNwxzTa5P1v0HjnDbJOd-U3LGpB6nbWPyO8BoNhbNdrWFDFjr-C1aIfQFp1H6aayqajE91xKJHHIDQsKQS3FrBlE_hcO7s5bC79-Zd0AsAh9C0JIsU8FrkiDwE6aVu7DFQSy7yg8bYSLpkOrzGNyejj__uEo9EcxhJqV8WWYaDBGJtUKosPUZIyXlczBAcoiSYyCFA9RYyD1iaI6MkxxpkAIslLVsiwgBCrSHbLRtI15QqiJUqmKNDc1l1mhjZSszIpEF2UV5VrnAYnX7BDarwAel3EhXL7CmRhYKICFwrFQXAfk7TimG1A6bqU-QC6PlIiw7S60_UJ4hRWFVqpSOSLegZ3DMkcto7qGDIxrLiuY5kuUETG0q452QswYhgU5xAABee0oEGWjwTKehVxZKz59O5kQvfFEdQtvqaXvioC1QmCuCeXuhBLMgJ7eXgur8GbIihulCcir8TaOxNK6xrQroGEpPATy5DIge4OQT1bm4_LHzK1MvxSIFZTAlP9DZi9WSvb4J6zBuoYk409vn9Mzci9BPcSiyniXbIDwm-cQ4l2qF16P_wAeglQt priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Effectiveness of struvite precipitation and ammonia stripping for recovery of phosphorus and nitrogen from anaerobic digestate: a systematic review |
| URI | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2462154827 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636414959 https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ri:diva-50962 https://res.slu.se/id/publ/109248 https://doaj.org/article/7cbbdb512130401993ca0ff2558c8ad5 |
| Volume | 9 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQuXBBQKkIlNagShxQ1MRJnIRbCluVlahQS1Fvlu047aIqWW26VfscvHBnbG_aAIILh1WkeBxl5392Zz4TsmNqpTIDygvGlIZpokyoYlWHRVM20kQ6KQ3-DvnlkB-cpNPT7PTeUV_YE-bggR3jdnOtVK0yRB4DfcN2My2jpoFMuNCFrC16KcS8e8XUD9d9BaEtWk3JFHy3jxMIjiFWSxjX4vB6FIksYP_vbvkXAFEbdPafkMc-W6SVe8un5IFpn5GNyd1wGix66-zXyU8HRez9F-0aiuiwV5BU0jmCWMw9HjeVbU0lKuBMIonFaDijkL5SrI9BuW9w8_y86-GzWPZ2A9j-ogN1oziRAnekQQgnTWv7FxWkrB8oPG0AhqZuKOY5OdmffPt4EPpDF0LNy_gyZBrcjkm0gjwwMSkvylpmEOpkzphRUMwhPgwUOVHURIargisQd1qqRpY5JDt5skHW2q41Lwg1USJVnmSmKWSaayMlL9Oc6byso0zrLCDxSgBCew7gwRgXwlYmBRdOaAKEJqzQxHVA3g975g6P46_UeyjXgRKxtO0N0DDhNUz8S8MCso1aIdxg6uARRMUxAcgg2gfkraVAPI0WG3bO5LLvxefjoxHRO0_UdPAttfTzD8ArhOAaUW6OKMHg9Xh5pZ7CO5xesJQzrD5ZHpA3wzLuxCa61nRLoOEJPAQq4jIgO06tR5z5NPteWc4sZgJRgRi88h_I-oulkgu8iN5gBwNLi5f_g9GvyCOG9olNlvEmWQMTMa8h5btUW-RhVU2Pp3Ddmxx-Pdqy1n4L5eFZxg |
| linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwELbK9gAcEBQqAoUaVMQBRU2cfySEtnSrXdquUGlRb8Z2nGWlKlmSLrTPwXvwjMwkTqoA6q2H1UrJ2HLmzzPJzGdCtnQqZaBBecGYfNv3pLalK1M7zpJMaEd5icb3kIfTcHzifzwNTlfI77YXBssqW59YO-q0UPiOfJv5IcPwmkXvF99tPDUKv662R2g0arGvL39Cyla9m-yCfF8xtjc6_jC2zakCtgoT99xmCuxKe0pCoONpP4yTVATgy0XEmJaQrSAACkTxjpM5OpRxKOF5_ERmIolgN488mPcWWfU9CBUGZHVnNP101L3VgQAGtlSn7c6Jw-3K9WAuG7M03E9d-6K3A9YHBfy7HfwFXFpvdnv3yT0TpdJho1YPyIrO18jd4aw0SB16jayPrlrkgNT4iOoh-dUAIhsvSouMIkbtD2AjXSCUxsKgglORp1QgX-cCSWqkiBmFIJpilg4mdomDF9-KCn7lsqoHgAcqC1B6in0xcEVoBJJSNK0_lEHg_JbCbB08NW1acx6RkxsR0joZ5EWuHxOqHU_IyAt0Fgs_UlqIMPEjpqIkdQKlAou4rTi4MhzA4znOeJ0fxSFvRMhBhLwWIb-wyJtuzKJBBbmWegel3FEiond9oShn3DgIHikpUxkgwh74VSyrVMLJMsj4YhWLFJa5iTrCm_bYzi_xYYhhSAAxh0Ve1hSI6pFj2dBMLKuKTz4f9YheG6KsgKdUwnRhAK8QCKxHudGjBLej-rdbZeXG7VX8ykgt8qK7jSOxlC_XxRJoQg8mgbw8schWo-Q9zuzOvwxrzpRzjthEDJb8H7LqbClFiX-80lhHwfz4yfVr2iS3x8eHB_xgMt1_Su4wtEks6HQ3yAAMQT-D8PJcPjc2TcnXm3YjfwDDNY-Y |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness+of+struvite+precipitation+and+ammonia+stripping+for+recovery+of+phosphorus+and+nitrogen+from+anaerobic+digestate&rft.jtitle=Environmental+evidence&rft.au=Lorick%2C+Dag&rft.au=Macura%2C+Biljana&rft.au=Ahlstr%C3%B6m%2C+Marcus&rft.au=Grimvall%2C+Anders+B.&rft.date=2020-11-11&rft.issn=2047-2382&rft.eissn=2047-2382&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13750-020-00211-x&rft.externalDocID=oai_DiVA_org_ri_50962 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2047-2382&client=summon |