Subjective cognitive decline: Self and informant comparisons

Abstract Background It is unclear whether self- or informant-based subjective cognition better distinguishes emotional factors from early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods Healthy members (n = 447) of the Arizona apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) cohort and their informants completed the self and...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAlzheimer's & dementia Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 93 - 98
Main Authors Caselli, Richard J, Chen, Kewei, Locke, Dona E.C, Lee, Wendy, Roontiva, Auttawut, Bandy, Dan, Fleisher, Adam S, Reiman, Eric M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.01.2014
ALZHEIMER'S & DEMENTIA
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract Background It is unclear whether self- or informant-based subjective cognition better distinguishes emotional factors from early-stage Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods Healthy members (n = 447) of the Arizona apolipoprotein E ( APOE ) cohort and their informants completed the self and informant paired Multidimensional Assessment of Neurodegenerative Symptoms questionnaire (MANS). Results Decline on the MANS was endorsed by 30.6% of members and 26.2% of informants. Self- and informant-based decliners had higher scores of psychological distress and slightly lower cognitive scores than nondecliners. Over the next 6.7 years, 20 developed mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Converters were older at entry than nonconverters (63.8 [7.0] vs 58.8 [7.3] years, P = .003), 85% were APOE ε4 carriers ( P < .0001), and they self-endorsed decline earlier than informants (58.9 [39.2] vs 28.0 [40.4] months before MCI; P = .002). Conclusions Self- and informant-based subjective decline correlated with greater psychological distress and slightly lower cognitive performance. Those with incident MCI generally self-endorsed decline earlier than informants.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:1552-5260
1552-5279
1552-5279
DOI:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.01.003