Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990-2009
This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures t...
Saved in:
Published in | World economy Vol. 34; no. 12; pp. 1955 - 1998 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
01.12.2011
Wiley-Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries. |
---|---|
AbstractList | This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the period 1990-2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-09. The 2008-09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession-affected high-income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within-period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China's exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign-imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a "South-South" phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti-subsidy) use across countries. Adapted from the source document. This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the period 1990-2009. The author constructs two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. The author then establishes a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-2009. The 2008-2009 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25% during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40%. This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database . I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries. This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies - temporary trade barriers (TTBs) - over the period 1990-2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-09. The 2008-09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession-affected high-income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within-period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China's exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign-imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a 'South-South' phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti-subsidy) use across countries. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries. |
Author | Bown, Chad P. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Chad P. surname: Bown fullname: Bown, Chad P. organization: Development Research Group, Trade and International Integration (DECTI), The World Bank, Washington, DC |
BackLink | http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=68608585X$$DView this record in ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
BookMark | eNqVkV9v0zAUxS00JLrBZyDiiYclXP-J7bwgTWV0SBUgtaiIF8t1nMltGnd2At23n7OiPuyF4Rdf2b9zro7OOTrrfGcRyjAUOJ0PmwIzLvJKAC4IYFwAplIWhxdocvo4QxOgQuZlReAVOo9xA4A5IzBB86Xeuu42W_TebDPfZFdd7-pht0-Pl9lCN_Z20KGOme7qbOqHrrfht3btqPk09M7GywxXFeQEoHqNXja6jfbN3_sC_fh8vZze5PNvsy_Tq3luuMQy11SvS8OY0A3FtSaWaEsajdMg1iVhlRQaG9DaCrNuSlqbCus155LVLMXg9AK9P_rug78bbOzVzkVj21Z31g9RYUEkLwET-DcKhAJhBD8HTRGZoI-u756gGz-ELmVWFWaYAyEkQW-PkDW-c1Htg9vpcK-45CBLWf5MhDwSJvgYg21ODAY1tqs2aixRjSWqsV312K46JOnHJ1Ljet073_Uh1fMfBn9ca--fvVgtV9fTcUwG-dHAxd4eTgY6bBUXVJRq9XWmVnI1-zVdcPWdPgDMQcsm |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2398422 crossref_primary_10_1111_rego_12057 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2328997 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chieco_2018_03_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpolmod_2021_02_009 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rie_2023_01_004 crossref_primary_10_3390_su70911484 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2023_103875 crossref_primary_10_1111_caje_12652 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_025_00582_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpolmod_2020_03_006 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745612000602 crossref_primary_10_1111_deve_12366 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecpo_12083 crossref_primary_10_1257_mac_20150370 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2665328 crossref_primary_10_1057_s41308_018_0061_9 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3360542 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11079_021_09639_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11558_015_9221_0 crossref_primary_10_1080_08853908_2015_1116418 crossref_primary_10_17233_sosyoekonomi_2021_02_03 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econ_2015_09_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eap_2021_04_007 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_564362 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecot_12297 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2017_06_006 crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12209 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40888_020_00186_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2014_08_006 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1517832 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4619151 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2013_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_09692290_2017_1316298 crossref_primary_10_17336_igusbd_633633 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2021_103937 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3271281 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3973320 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2686555 crossref_primary_10_1017_S147474562100029X crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1600304 crossref_primary_10_18107_japs_2017_24_3_004 crossref_primary_10_31625_issdoi_2014__16_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_1540496X_2024_2362231 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1992400 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_014_0198_1 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3810026 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3920630 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12399_013_0365_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_forsci_fxaa022 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdeveco_2014_05_001 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2190545 crossref_primary_10_1080_17538963_2019_1608047 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3577890 crossref_primary_10_3390_su12093839 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020818315000247 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1969956 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2852365 crossref_primary_10_1111_boer_12386 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2020_103417 crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12786 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2021_103536 crossref_primary_10_3982_QE1994 crossref_primary_10_1080_1540496X_2023_2177100 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2847007 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3577935 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3054988 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1950462 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_019_00359_w crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745624000284 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020818319000237 crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745622000039 crossref_primary_10_1080_13504851_2022_2146649 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2019_103344 crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6351_3101 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_013_9382_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_013_9384_x crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2057440 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2014_09_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_ecin_12345 crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12113 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3378791 crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12257 crossref_primary_10_1111_roie_12247 crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12114 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_082912_110201 crossref_primary_10_3390_economies13030067 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2012_12_001 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_019_00346_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_13602381_2025_2467372 crossref_primary_10_1093_oxrep_grs015 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00331.x 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01617.x 10.1046/j.1467-9396.2003.00415.x 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531 10.2307/2534729 10.7551/mitpress/2628.001.0001 10.1257/aer.96.3.896 10.1002/9780470756461.ch9 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.04.006 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01516.x 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00339.x 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00063-4 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.06.001 10.1257/aer.96.3.877 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.004 10.2139/ssrn.1513927 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00605.x 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00797.x 10.1017/S1474745610000340 10.1017/S1474745609990061 10.1093/wber/lhh032 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003 10.1093/oso/9780199553761.001.0001 10.1007/s10290-006-0059-7 10.1111/0008-4085.00090 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2011 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd – notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2011 |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION OQ6 7TQ 7UB 8BJ DHY DON FQK JBE |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01388.x |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef ECONIS PAIS Index Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) PAIS International PAIS International (Ovid) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) PAIS International Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
DatabaseTitleList | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) PAIS International CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics Business |
EISSN | 1467-9701 |
EndPage | 1998 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2553360041 68608585X 10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x TWEC1388 ark_67375_WNG_W8WGZCS6_P |
Genre | article Feature |
GroupedDBID | -DZ -~X .3N .GA .L6 .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OB 1OC 1OL 1XV 29R 31~ 33P 3R3 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51Y 52M 52O 52Q 52S 52T 52U 52W 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 9M8 A04 AABNI AAESR AAHHS AAONW AAOUF AASGY AAXRX AAYOK AAZKR ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABLJU ABPVW ABSOO ACAHQ ACBKW ACBWZ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHQT ACPOU ACSCC ACXQS ADBBV ADEMA ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADXAS ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AEMOZ AEQDE AEUQT AEUYR AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFKFF AFPWT AFZJQ AHBTC AHEFC AIFKG AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AKVCP ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB ASPBG ASTYK AVWKF AZBYB AZFZN AZVAB BAFTC BDRZF BFHJK BKOMP BMXJE BNVMJ BQESF BROTX BRXPI BSCLL BY8 CAG COF CS3 D-C D-D DC6 DCZOG DJZPD DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSSH DU5 EBA EBE EBO EBR EBS EBU EJD EMK EOH F00 F01 FEDTE FZ0 G-S G.N G50 GODZA HGLYW HVGLF HZI HZ~ IHE IX1 J0M K1G K48 LATKE LC2 LC4 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LPU LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSSH MSFUL MSSSH MXFUL MXSSH N04 N06 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG P2W P2Y P4C PALCI PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RIWAO RJQFR ROL RX1 SAMSI SUPJJ TAE TH9 TKY TN5 UB1 ULY W8V W99 WBKPD WEBCB WIH WII WOHZO WQZ WRC WSUWO WXSBR XG1 ZZTAW ~IA ~WP AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AANHP AAYCA ACRPL ACYXJ ADNMO ADXHL AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGHNM AGQPQ AGXDD AHQJS AIDQK AIDYY ALVPJ AAYXX AGCSZ CITATION OQ6 VUBTB 7TQ 7UB 8BJ DHY DON FQK JBE |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6818-a3ab5c447af31da2e2ae2fa12e27b524987a1c0aae7cbf53dc91ab6684d437863 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0378-5920 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 22:00:51 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:13:58 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:02:34 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 12 03:40:32 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 08 16:07:01 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:05:07 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025 Wed Aug 20 07:25:37 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:53:13 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 12 |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6818-a3ab5c447af31da2e2ae2fa12e27b524987a1c0aae7cbf53dc91ab6684d437863 |
Notes | ArticleID:TWEC1388 ark:/67375/WNG-W8WGZCS6-P istex:281CB40E56B7ACF60C4D25D3524DF8AA19540ED9 I thank Piyush Chandra, Meredith Crowley, Jeff Drope, Bob Feinberg, Bernard Hoekman, Hiau Looi Kee, Jesse Kreier, Nuno Limão, Rod Ludema, Anna Maria Mayda, Rachel McCulloch, Niall Meagher, Jorge Miranda, Çaglar Ozden, Tom Prusa, Raymond Robertson, Michele Ruta, Robert Staiger, Patricia Tovar, Maurizio Zanardi, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at the Stanford SITE Conference, USITC, and World Bank for helpful comments. Aksel Erbahar and Lauren Deason provided outstanding research assistance. I gratefully acknowledge funding for this project from the World Bank’s Multi‐Donor Trust Fund. Any opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s and should not be attributed to the World Bank. All remaining errors are my own. SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01388.x |
PQID | 914160222 |
PQPubID | 36224 |
PageCount | 44 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1728650120 proquest_miscellaneous_1023024210 proquest_miscellaneous_1000947320 proquest_journals_914160222 econis_primary_68608585X crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x_TWEC1388 istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_W8WGZCS6_P |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | December 2011 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2011-12-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 12 year: 2011 text: December 2011 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford |
PublicationTitle | World economy |
PublicationYear | 2011 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd Wiley-Blackwell |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Wiley-Blackwell |
References | Gallaway, M., B. A. Blonigen and J. Flynn (1999), 'Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law', Journal of International Economics, 49, 2, 211-44. Moore, M. O. (2006), 'An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 142, 1, 122-50. Irwin, D. A. (2011), Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1994), 'Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 51-118. Niels, G. and J. Francois (2006), 'Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico', Review of Development Economics, 10, 3, 388-99. Messerlin, P. A. (2004), 'China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards', World Bank Economic Review, 18, 1, 105-30. Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). Fischer, R. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Contingent Protection as Better Insurance', Review of International Economics, 11, 5, 745-57. Estevadeordal, A., C. Freund and E. Ornelas (2008), 'Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non-Members?', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 4, 1531-75. Staiger, R. W. and A. O. Sykes (2010), ''Currency Manipulation' and World Trade', World Trade Review, 9, 4, 583-627. Ludema, R. D. and A. M. Mayda (2009), 'Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?', Journal of International Economics, 77, 2, 137-50. Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2006), 'Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 877-95. Knetter, M. M. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries', Journal of International Economics, 61, 1, 1-17. Bown, C. P. and M. A. Crowley (2010), 'China's Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System? Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 4, 1353-88. Bown, C. P. and P. Tovar (2011), 'Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India's Tariff Reform', Journal of Development Economics, 96, 1, 115-25. Evenett, S. J. (2009), 'Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch', World Trade Review, 8, 4, 607-9. Hoekman, B. M. and M. M. Kostecki (2009), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 3rd edn (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press). Egger, P. and D. Nelson (forthcoming), 'How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data', The Review of Economics and Statistics. Bown, C. P. (2008), 'The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries', Economics and Politics, 20, 2, 255-88. Prusa, T. J. (2001), 'On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping', Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 3, 591-611. Blanchard, E. (2010), 'Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?', Journal of International Economics, 82, 1, 63-72. Moore, M. O. and M. Zanardi (2009), 'Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?', Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 2, 469-95. Reynolds, K. M. (2009), 'From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement', Review of International Economics, 17, 5, 969-85. Zanardi, M. (2004), 'Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?', The World Economy, 27, 3, 403-33. Vandenbussche, H. and M. Zanardi (2010), 'The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation', European Economic Review, 54, 6, 760-77. Limão, N. (2006), 'Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 896-914. 2010; 54 2006; 96 2009; 42 2011 2010 2006; 10 2004; 27 1999; 49 2009 2011; 96 2007 1994 2005 2003 2002 2008; 123 2003; 11 2010; 82 2009; 77 2010; 43 2004; 18 2010c 2010b 2010a 2009; 8 2006; 142 2008; 20 2003; 61 2001; 34 2010; 9 2009; 17 e_1_2_8_28_1 Irwin D. A. (e_1_2_8_22_1) 2011 e_1_2_8_29_1 e_1_2_8_24_1 e_1_2_8_25_1 e_1_2_8_26_1 e_1_2_8_27_1 Bown C. P. (e_1_2_8_12_1) 2010 e_1_2_8_3_1 e_1_2_8_2_1 e_1_2_8_5_1 e_1_2_8_4_1 e_1_2_8_7_1 e_1_2_8_6_1 e_1_2_8_8_1 e_1_2_8_20_1 Hoekman B. M. (e_1_2_8_21_1) 2009 e_1_2_8_23_1 e_1_2_8_17_1 e_1_2_8_18_1 e_1_2_8_39_1 e_1_2_8_19_1 e_1_2_8_13_1 e_1_2_8_36_1 e_1_2_8_14_1 e_1_2_8_35_1 e_1_2_8_15_1 Egger P. (e_1_2_8_16_1) e_1_2_8_38_1 Bown C. P. (e_1_2_8_9_1) 2009 e_1_2_8_32_1 e_1_2_8_10_1 e_1_2_8_31_1 e_1_2_8_11_1 e_1_2_8_34_1 e_1_2_8_33_1 de la Torre L. E. R. (e_1_2_8_37_1) 2005 e_1_2_8_30_1 |
References_xml | – reference: Bown, C. P. (2008), 'The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries', Economics and Politics, 20, 2, 255-88. – reference: Egger, P. and D. Nelson (forthcoming), 'How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data', The Review of Economics and Statistics. – reference: Ludema, R. D. and A. M. Mayda (2009), 'Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?', Journal of International Economics, 77, 2, 137-50. – reference: Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). – reference: Staiger, R. W. and A. O. Sykes (2010), ''Currency Manipulation' and World Trade', World Trade Review, 9, 4, 583-627. – reference: Bown, C. P. and P. Tovar (2011), 'Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India's Tariff Reform', Journal of Development Economics, 96, 1, 115-25. – reference: Moore, M. O. (2006), 'An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 142, 1, 122-50. – reference: Fischer, R. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Contingent Protection as Better Insurance', Review of International Economics, 11, 5, 745-57. – reference: Irwin, D. A. (2011), Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). – reference: Hoekman, B. M. and M. M. Kostecki (2009), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 3rd edn (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press). – reference: Knetter, M. M. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries', Journal of International Economics, 61, 1, 1-17. – reference: Moore, M. O. and M. Zanardi (2009), 'Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?', Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 2, 469-95. – reference: Messerlin, P. A. (2004), 'China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards', World Bank Economic Review, 18, 1, 105-30. – reference: Blanchard, E. (2010), 'Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?', Journal of International Economics, 82, 1, 63-72. – reference: Prusa, T. J. (2001), 'On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping', Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 3, 591-611. – reference: Vandenbussche, H. and M. Zanardi (2010), 'The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation', European Economic Review, 54, 6, 760-77. – reference: Zanardi, M. (2004), 'Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?', The World Economy, 27, 3, 403-33. – reference: Bown, C. P. and M. A. Crowley (2010), 'China's Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System? Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 4, 1353-88. – reference: Estevadeordal, A., C. Freund and E. Ornelas (2008), 'Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non-Members?', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 4, 1531-75. – reference: Evenett, S. J. (2009), 'Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch', World Trade Review, 8, 4, 607-9. – reference: Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2006), 'Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 877-95. – reference: Reynolds, K. M. (2009), 'From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement', Review of International Economics, 17, 5, 969-85. – reference: Gallaway, M., B. A. Blonigen and J. Flynn (1999), 'Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law', Journal of International Economics, 49, 2, 211-44. – reference: Limão, N. (2006), 'Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 896-914. – reference: Niels, G. and J. Francois (2006), 'Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico', Review of Development Economics, 10, 3, 388-99. – reference: Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1994), 'Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 51-118. – year: 2011 – volume: 34 start-page: 591 issue: 3 year: 2001 end-page: 611 article-title: On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics – year: 2009 – volume: 11 start-page: 745 issue: 5 year: 2003 end-page: 57 article-title: Contingent Protection as Better Insurance publication-title: Review of International Economics – volume: 49 start-page: 211 issue: 2 year: 1999 end-page: 44 article-title: Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law publication-title: Journal of International Economics – volume: 54 start-page: 760 issue: 6 year: 2010 end-page: 77 article-title: The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation publication-title: European Economic Review – volume: 82 start-page: 63 issue: 1 year: 2010 end-page: 72 article-title: Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete? publication-title: Journal of International Economics – start-page: 281 year: 2010c end-page: 337 – volume: 18 start-page: 105 issue: 1 year: 2004 end-page: 30 article-title: China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards publication-title: World Bank Economic Review – volume: 142 start-page: 122 issue: 1 year: 2006 end-page: 50 article-title: An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions publication-title: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv – year: 2010b – year: 2007 – volume: 9 start-page: 583 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 627 article-title: ‘Currency Manipulation’ and World Trade publication-title: World Trade Review – volume: 123 start-page: 1531 issue: 4 year: 2008 end-page: 75 article-title: Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non‐Members? publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics – volume: 27 start-page: 403 issue: 3 year: 2004 end-page: 33 article-title: Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha? publication-title: The World Economy – year: 2010a – volume: 61 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2003 end-page: 17 article-title: Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries publication-title: Journal of International Economics – start-page: 205 year: 2005 end-page: 46 – volume: 43 start-page: 1353 issue: 4 year: 2010 end-page: 88 article-title: China’s Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System? publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics – volume: 10 start-page: 388 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 99 article-title: Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico publication-title: Review of Development Economics – article-title: How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data publication-title: The Review of Economics and Statistics – start-page: 51 year: 1994 end-page: 118 article-title: Measuring Industry‐Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States publication-title: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics – year: 2010 – volume: 42 start-page: 469 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 95 article-title: Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries? publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics – year: 2002 – volume: 20 start-page: 255 issue: 2 year: 2008 end-page: 88 article-title: The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries publication-title: Economics and Politics – volume: 96 start-page: 115 year: 2011 end-page: 25 article-title: Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India’s Tariff Reform publication-title: Journal of Development Economics – volume: 17 start-page: 969 issue: 5 year: 2009 end-page: 85 article-title: From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement publication-title: Review of International Economics – start-page: 251 year: 2003 end-page: 84 – start-page: 91 year: 2009 end-page: 118 – volume: 96 start-page: 896 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 914 article-title: Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US publication-title: American Economic Review – volume: 77 start-page: 137 issue: 2 year: 2009 end-page: 50 article-title: Do Countries Free Ride on MFN? publication-title: Journal of International Economics – volume: 96 start-page: 877 issue: 3 year: 2006 end-page: 95 article-title: Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System? publication-title: American Economic Review – volume: 8 start-page: 607 issue: 4 year: 2009 end-page: 9 article-title: Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch publication-title: World Trade Review – ident: e_1_2_8_24_1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00331.x – ident: e_1_2_8_13_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01617.x – ident: e_1_2_8_16_1 article-title: How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data publication-title: The Review of Economics and Statistics – ident: e_1_2_8_19_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9396.2003.00415.x – ident: e_1_2_8_17_1 doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531 – ident: e_1_2_8_36_1 doi: 10.2307/2534729 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_1 – start-page: 281 volume-title: China’s Growing Role in World Trade year: 2010 ident: e_1_2_8_12_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_1 doi: 10.7551/mitpress/2628.001.0001 – ident: e_1_2_8_25_1 doi: 10.1257/aer.96.3.896 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_1 doi: 10.1002/9780470756461.ch9 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.04.006 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_10_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01516.x – ident: e_1_2_8_31_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00339.x – ident: e_1_2_8_20_1 doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00063-4 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.06.001 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_1 doi: 10.1257/aer.96.3.877 – ident: e_1_2_8_27_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.004 – ident: e_1_2_8_34_1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1513927 – ident: e_1_2_8_39_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00605.x – ident: e_1_2_8_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00797.x – ident: e_1_2_8_35_1 doi: 10.1017/S1474745610000340 – start-page: 205 volume-title: Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_8_37_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_23_1 – start-page: 91 volume-title: Effective Crisis Response and Openness: Implications for the Trading System year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_8_9_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_1 doi: 10.1017/S1474745609990061 – ident: e_1_2_8_28_1 doi: 10.1093/wber/lhh032 – ident: e_1_2_8_38_1 doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003 – volume-title: The Political Economy of the World Trading System year: 2009 ident: e_1_2_8_21_1 doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199553761.001.0001 – volume-title: Peddling Protectionism: Smoot‐Hawley and the Great Depression year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_8_22_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_26_1 – ident: e_1_2_8_29_1 doi: 10.1007/s10290-006-0059-7 – ident: e_1_2_8_32_1 doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00090 |
SSID | ssj0016420 |
Score | 2.3046074 |
Snippet | This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the... This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the... This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies - temporary trade barriers (TTBs) - over the... |
SourceID | proquest econis crossref wiley istex |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1955 |
SubjectTerms | 1990-2009 Anti dumping Anti-dumping policy Antidumping China China (People's Republic) Countervailing duties Cross-national analysis Data Banks Economic conditions Economic Crises Economic crisis Economic development European Union Exports Exports and Imports Handelshemmnisse Peoples Republic of China Stocks Studies Subsidies Trade barriers Trade Policy Trends United States United States of America Welt World Bank |
Title | Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990-2009 |
URI | https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-W8WGZCS6-P/fulltext.pdf https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.2011.01388.x http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=68608585X https://www.proquest.com/docview/914160222 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1000947320 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1023024210 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1728650120 |
Volume | 34 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1di9QwFA2yiPqy6qpsd1UiiE_boWnSpHlcxv1AcBBnlhl8CUnTLsNIR7YdWHzyP_gP_SXe2y8clWUR30LbFHJ7b3JOc-8JIa8LKRSgfpj9mM9DIb0IrY5dWESp0D5j2nOsHX4_kecX4t0iWXT5T1gL0-pDDD_cMDKa-RoD3LrqzyDXKmKdEifjaTpCPImpW4iPPg5KUkAKWoVGDqQp0XG0ndTz1xdtrVR3kZ4uK4CwaP3rLTz6K6ptlqXTh2TVD6jNRlmNNrUbZV9_03r8PyN-RHY79EqPW3d7TO7k5R651yfP75H7fZ1z9YRMZs1BV3Raw5RL1wU9LuulB--Bi0d0aov8Et2zorb0FEvjMfnSLrE8nr7doM7rEWWwiv349h33Vp6Si9OT2fg87E5vCDMJKCC03LokE0LZgjNv4zy2eVxYBg3lEmB9qbIsi6zNVeaKhPtMM-ukTIUX8JUkf0Z2ynWZ7xPKudVeW49FsyJXFpqpRqkxF8cOWHZAVP-lTNZJm-MJG5_NFsVRBk1n0HSmMZ25Dggben5p5T1u0We_dYahh0xlhPuri4C8adxjuGOvVpg5pxIzn5yZeTo_-zSeSvMhIIe9_5hu0qiMZoCOkYAH5NVwF6Idt3Bsma83FSpMAx9XPI5uegZoJe703_SMwopkLJwG2zU-d-vhm9n8ZIzNg3_ueUgeNL_mm6yg52SnvtrkLwDb1e5lE7U_ARI4OvA |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQQZRLgQJqWn6MhDg1qzhO7PhYLW0XaFeI3WpXXCwndtCqVRY1WanixDvwhjwJM_kTC6iqEDcriSN5PGPPZ898Q8irXEQSvH5Y_Zh1fiRs5BsVpn4eJJGyGVOWY-7w6ViMzqJ383jelgPCXJiGH6I_cEPLqNdrNHA8kP7TypUMWEvFyXiSDMChvI0Fvmt89bHnkgJY0HA0coBNsQqD9bCev_5pba-6gwB1UYITi_K_WvNIf_Vr643p6D656IbUxKOcD1ZVOsi-_sb2-J_G_IBstQ4sPWg07iG55YptcreLn98mm12qc_mIjKd1rSs6qWDVpcucHhTVwoICwcN9OjG5-4waWlJTWIrZ8Rh_aRaYIU_frJDqdZ8y2Mh-fPuO1yuPydnR4XQ48tsCDn4mwBHwDTdpnEWRNDln1oQuNC7MDYOGTGMAfok0LAuMcTJL85jbTDGTCpFENoJpEvwJ2SiWhdshlHOjrDIW82YjJw00E4VsY2kYpgC0PSK7qdJZy26ORTYu9BrKkRpFp1F0uhadvvII63t-aRg-btBnp9GGvodIRIBXrHOPvK71o39jLs8xeE7GejY-1rNkdvxpOBH6g0f2OgXS7bpRasXAQUYM7pGX_VsweLzFMYVbrkokmQZILnkYXPcNIEu87L_uG4lJyZg7DbKrle7Gw9fT2eEQm7v_3PMF2RxNT0_0ydvx-z1yrz6pr4OEnpKN6nLlnoGrV6XPaxP-CchcPws |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bb9MwFLbQQIOXAQO0bFyChHhaqjh27PhxateNWzXRTq14sZzYQVVROq2pNPHEf-Af8ks4JzdRQNOEeLOSOJJPzrG_Lz7nMyGvcsEloH6Y_ah1AReWB0ZFaZCHCVc2o8oyrB3-MBKn5_ztLJ41-U9YC1PrQ3Q_3DAyqvkaA_zC5n8GuZIhbZQ4KUuSHuDJ21yECXr44GMnJQWsoJZoZMCaYhWFm1k9f33TxlJ1B_npfAUYFs1_tQFIf4W11bo0vE8W7YjqdJRFb12mvezrb2KP_2fID8hOA1_9o9rfHpJbrtgl2232_C652xY6rx6R0aQ66coflzDn-svcPyrKuQX3gYuH_tjk7jP658o3hfWxNh6zL80c6-P9wRqFXg99CsvYj2_fcXPlMTkfHk_6p0FzfEOQCYABgWEmjTPOpckZtSZykXFRbig0ZBoD7UukoVlojJNZmsfMZoqaVIiEWw5fSbAnZKtYFm6P-IwZZZWxWDXLnTTQTBRqjaVRlALN9ohsv5TOGm1zPGLji97gOFKj6TSaTlem01ceoV3Pi1rf4wZ99mpn6HqIBDwOiNfMI68r9-jumMsFps7JWE9HJ3qaTE8-9cdCn3nkoPUf3cwaK60owGNk4B552d2FcMc9HFO45XqFEtNAyCWLwuueAV6JW_3XPSOxJBkrp8F2lc_dePh6Mj3uY3P_n3u-INtng6F-_2b07oDcq37TVxlCT8lWebl2zwDnlenzKoB_AtrBPcM |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking+Stock+of+Antidumping%2C+Safeguards+and+Countervailing+Duties%2C+1990-2009&rft.jtitle=World+economy&rft.au=Bown%2C+Chad+P&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.issn=0378-5920&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.2011.01388.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon |