Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990-2009

This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld economy Vol. 34; no. 12; pp. 1955 - 1998
Main Author Bown, Chad P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.12.2011
Wiley-Blackwell
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries.
AbstractList This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the period 1990-2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-09. The 2008-09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession-affected high-income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within-period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China's exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign-imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a "South-South" phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti-subsidy) use across countries. Adapted from the source document.
This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the period 1990-2009. The author constructs two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. The author then establishes a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-2009. The 2008-2009 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25% during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40%.
This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database . I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries.
This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies - temporary trade barriers (TTBs) - over the period 1990-2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank's Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008-09. The 2008-09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession-affected high-income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within-period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China's exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign-imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a 'South-South' phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti-subsidy) use across countries. Reprinted by permission of Blackwell Publishers
This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the period 1990–2009. I construct two new measures of imported products subject to the combined use of these TTBs before applying these measures to new data drawn from the World Bank’s Temporary Trade Barriers Database. I then establish a number of facts regarding trends in historical use to benchmark against policy activity during the global economic crisis of 2008–09. The 2008–09 economic shock mostly accentuates patterns and trends already visible in the precrisis data: e.g., while the major users of such policies overall combined to increase the product lines subject to TTBs by 25 per cent during the crisis, this was driven almost entirely by developing economies which increased their product coverage by 40 per cent. Perhaps surprisingly, recession‐affected high‐income economies increased their stock of product coverage by only 5 per cent during the crisis, a muted policy response consistent with earlier trends in which major developed economies like the United States and EU reduced the stock of imported products they subject to TTBs to 2007 levels that were only 50 per cent as high as their within‐period peak. Furthermore, a previously unidentified feature of the data is that a much larger share of China’s exported products to other developing economies is subject to foreign‐imposed antidumping than its exports to developed economies. The evidence confirms this feature is shared by a number of other major developing economy exporters, deepening concern that these discriminatory trade barriers are increasingly a ‘South–South’ phenomenon. Finally, I also clarify emerging trends in countervailing duty (anti‐subsidy) use across countries.
Author Bown, Chad P.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Chad P.
  surname: Bown
  fullname: Bown, Chad P.
  organization: Development Research Group, Trade and International Integration (DECTI), The World Bank, Washington, DC
BackLink http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=68608585X$$DView this record in ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
BookMark eNqVkV9v0zAUxS00JLrBZyDiiYclXP-J7bwgTWV0SBUgtaiIF8t1nMltGnd2At23n7OiPuyF4Rdf2b9zro7OOTrrfGcRyjAUOJ0PmwIzLvJKAC4IYFwAplIWhxdocvo4QxOgQuZlReAVOo9xA4A5IzBB86Xeuu42W_TebDPfZFdd7-pht0-Pl9lCN_Z20KGOme7qbOqHrrfht3btqPk09M7GywxXFeQEoHqNXja6jfbN3_sC_fh8vZze5PNvsy_Tq3luuMQy11SvS8OY0A3FtSaWaEsajdMg1iVhlRQaG9DaCrNuSlqbCus155LVLMXg9AK9P_rug78bbOzVzkVj21Z31g9RYUEkLwET-DcKhAJhBD8HTRGZoI-u756gGz-ELmVWFWaYAyEkQW-PkDW-c1Htg9vpcK-45CBLWf5MhDwSJvgYg21ODAY1tqs2aixRjSWqsV312K46JOnHJ1Ljet073_Uh1fMfBn9ca--fvVgtV9fTcUwG-dHAxd4eTgY6bBUXVJRq9XWmVnI1-zVdcPWdPgDMQcsm
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2398422
crossref_primary_10_1111_rego_12057
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2328997
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chieco_2018_03_001
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpolmod_2021_02_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rie_2023_01_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_su70911484
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2023_103875
crossref_primary_10_1111_caje_12652
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_025_00582_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpolmod_2020_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745612000602
crossref_primary_10_1111_deve_12366
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecpo_12083
crossref_primary_10_1257_mac_20150370
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2665328
crossref_primary_10_1057_s41308_018_0061_9
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3360542
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11079_021_09639_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11558_015_9221_0
crossref_primary_10_1080_08853908_2015_1116418
crossref_primary_10_17233_sosyoekonomi_2021_02_03
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_econ_2015_09_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eap_2021_04_007
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_564362
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecot_12297
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2017_06_006
crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12209
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40888_020_00186_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_irfa_2014_08_006
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1517832
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4619151
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2013_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1080_09692290_2017_1316298
crossref_primary_10_17336_igusbd_633633
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2021_103937
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3271281
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3973320
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2686555
crossref_primary_10_1017_S147474562100029X
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1600304
crossref_primary_10_18107_japs_2017_24_3_004
crossref_primary_10_31625_issdoi_2014__16_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_1540496X_2024_2362231
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1992400
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_014_0198_1
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3810026
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3920630
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12399_013_0365_9
crossref_primary_10_1093_forsci_fxaa022
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jdeveco_2014_05_001
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2190545
crossref_primary_10_1080_17538963_2019_1608047
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3577890
crossref_primary_10_3390_su12093839
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020818315000247
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1969956
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2852365
crossref_primary_10_1111_boer_12386
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2020_103417
crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12786
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2021_103536
crossref_primary_10_3982_QE1994
crossref_primary_10_1080_1540496X_2023_2177100
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2847007
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3577935
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3054988
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_1950462
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_019_00359_w
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745624000284
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0020818319000237
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1474745622000039
crossref_primary_10_1080_13504851_2022_2146649
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2019_103344
crossref_primary_10_1590_0103_6351_3101
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_013_9382_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_013_9384_x
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2057440
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_forpol_2014_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecin_12345
crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12113
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3378791
crossref_primary_10_1111_raq_12257
crossref_primary_10_1111_roie_12247
crossref_primary_10_1111_twec_12114
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_082912_110201
crossref_primary_10_3390_economies13030067
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jinteco_2012_12_001
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10290_019_00346_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_13602381_2025_2467372
crossref_primary_10_1093_oxrep_grs015
Cites_doi 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6
10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00331.x
10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01617.x
10.1046/j.1467-9396.2003.00415.x
10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531
10.2307/2534729
10.7551/mitpress/2628.001.0001
10.1257/aer.96.3.896
10.1002/9780470756461.ch9
10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.04.006
10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01516.x
10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00339.x
10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00063-4
10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.06.001
10.1257/aer.96.3.877
10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.004
10.2139/ssrn.1513927
10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00605.x
10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00797.x
10.1017/S1474745610000340
10.1017/S1474745609990061
10.1093/wber/lhh032
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003
10.1093/oso/9780199553761.001.0001
10.1007/s10290-006-0059-7
10.1111/0008-4085.00090
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2011
Copyright_xml – notice: 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– notice: Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Dec 2011
DBID BSCLL
AAYXX
CITATION
OQ6
7TQ
7UB
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01388.x
DatabaseName Istex
CrossRef
ECONIS
PAIS Index
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
PAIS International (Ovid)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
PAIS International
CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)

DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Business
EISSN 1467-9701
EndPage 1998
ExternalDocumentID 2553360041
68608585X
10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x
TWEC1388
ark_67375_WNG_W8WGZCS6_P
Genre article
Feature
GroupedDBID -DZ
-~X
.3N
.GA
.L6
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OB
1OC
1OL
1XV
29R
31~
33P
3R3
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51Y
52M
52O
52Q
52S
52T
52U
52W
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
8UM
930
9M8
A04
AABNI
AAESR
AAHHS
AAONW
AAOUF
AASGY
AAXRX
AAYOK
AAZKR
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEML
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPVW
ABSOO
ACAHQ
ACBKW
ACBWZ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACPOU
ACSCC
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADEMA
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADMHG
ADXAS
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AEMOZ
AEQDE
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFKFF
AFPWT
AFZJQ
AHBTC
AHEFC
AIFKG
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AKVCP
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
ASPBG
ASTYK
AVWKF
AZBYB
AZFZN
AZVAB
BAFTC
BDRZF
BFHJK
BKOMP
BMXJE
BNVMJ
BQESF
BROTX
BRXPI
BSCLL
BY8
CAG
COF
CS3
D-C
D-D
DC6
DCZOG
DJZPD
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSSH
DU5
EBA
EBE
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
EJD
EMK
EOH
F00
F01
FEDTE
FZ0
G-S
G.N
G50
GODZA
HGLYW
HVGLF
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IX1
J0M
K1G
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC4
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LPU
LUTES
LW6
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSSH
MSFUL
MSSSH
MXFUL
MXSSH
N04
N06
N9A
NF~
O66
O9-
OIG
P2W
P2Y
P4C
PALCI
PQQKQ
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RIWAO
RJQFR
ROL
RX1
SAMSI
SUPJJ
TAE
TH9
TKY
TN5
UB1
ULY
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WEBCB
WIH
WII
WOHZO
WQZ
WRC
WSUWO
WXSBR
XG1
ZZTAW
~IA
~WP
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AANHP
AAYCA
ACRPL
ACYXJ
ADNMO
ADXHL
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AFWVQ
AGHNM
AGQPQ
AGXDD
AHQJS
AIDQK
AIDYY
ALVPJ
AAYXX
AGCSZ
CITATION
OQ6
VUBTB
7TQ
7UB
8BJ
DHY
DON
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c6818-a3ab5c447af31da2e2ae2fa12e27b524987a1c0aae7cbf53dc91ab6684d437863
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0378-5920
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 22:00:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:13:58 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:02:34 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 12 03:40:32 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 16:07:01 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:05:07 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 20 07:25:37 EDT 2025
Wed Oct 30 09:53:13 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 12
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6818-a3ab5c447af31da2e2ae2fa12e27b524987a1c0aae7cbf53dc91ab6684d437863
Notes ArticleID:TWEC1388
ark:/67375/WNG-W8WGZCS6-P
istex:281CB40E56B7ACF60C4D25D3524DF8AA19540ED9
I thank Piyush Chandra, Meredith Crowley, Jeff Drope, Bob Feinberg, Bernard Hoekman, Hiau Looi Kee, Jesse Kreier, Nuno Limão, Rod Ludema, Anna Maria Mayda, Rachel McCulloch, Niall Meagher, Jorge Miranda, Çaglar Ozden, Tom Prusa, Raymond Robertson, Michele Ruta, Robert Staiger, Patricia Tovar, Maurizio Zanardi, two anonymous referees and seminar participants at the Stanford SITE Conference, USITC, and World Bank for helpful comments. Aksel Erbahar and Lauren Deason provided outstanding research assistance. I gratefully acknowledge funding for this project from the World Bank’s Multi‐Donor Trust Fund. Any opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s and should not be attributed to the World Bank. All remaining errors are my own.
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01388.x
PQID 914160222
PQPubID 36224
PageCount 44
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1728650120
proquest_miscellaneous_1023024210
proquest_miscellaneous_1000947320
proquest_journals_914160222
econis_primary_68608585X
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1467_9701_2011_01388_x_TWEC1388
istex_primary_ark_67375_WNG_W8WGZCS6_P
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate December 2011
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2011-12-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2011
  text: December 2011
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: Oxford
PublicationTitle World economy
PublicationYear 2011
Publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley-Blackwell
Publisher_xml – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley-Blackwell
References Gallaway, M., B. A. Blonigen and J. Flynn (1999), 'Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law', Journal of International Economics, 49, 2, 211-44.
Moore, M. O. (2006), 'An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 142, 1, 122-50.
Irwin, D. A. (2011), Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1994), 'Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 51-118.
Niels, G. and J. Francois (2006), 'Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico', Review of Development Economics, 10, 3, 388-99.
Messerlin, P. A. (2004), 'China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards', World Bank Economic Review, 18, 1, 105-30.
Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Fischer, R. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Contingent Protection as Better Insurance', Review of International Economics, 11, 5, 745-57.
Estevadeordal, A., C. Freund and E. Ornelas (2008), 'Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non-Members?', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 4, 1531-75.
Staiger, R. W. and A. O. Sykes (2010), ''Currency Manipulation' and World Trade', World Trade Review, 9, 4, 583-627.
Ludema, R. D. and A. M. Mayda (2009), 'Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?', Journal of International Economics, 77, 2, 137-50.
Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2006), 'Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 877-95.
Knetter, M. M. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries', Journal of International Economics, 61, 1, 1-17.
Bown, C. P. and M. A. Crowley (2010), 'China's Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System? Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 4, 1353-88.
Bown, C. P. and P. Tovar (2011), 'Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India's Tariff Reform', Journal of Development Economics, 96, 1, 115-25.
Evenett, S. J. (2009), 'Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch', World Trade Review, 8, 4, 607-9.
Hoekman, B. M. and M. M. Kostecki (2009), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 3rd edn (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
Egger, P. and D. Nelson (forthcoming), 'How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data', The Review of Economics and Statistics.
Bown, C. P. (2008), 'The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries', Economics and Politics, 20, 2, 255-88.
Prusa, T. J. (2001), 'On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping', Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 3, 591-611.
Blanchard, E. (2010), 'Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?', Journal of International Economics, 82, 1, 63-72.
Moore, M. O. and M. Zanardi (2009), 'Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?', Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 2, 469-95.
Reynolds, K. M. (2009), 'From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement', Review of International Economics, 17, 5, 969-85.
Zanardi, M. (2004), 'Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?', The World Economy, 27, 3, 403-33.
Vandenbussche, H. and M. Zanardi (2010), 'The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation', European Economic Review, 54, 6, 760-77.
Limão, N. (2006), 'Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 896-914.
2010; 54
2006; 96
2009; 42
2011
2010
2006; 10
2004; 27
1999; 49
2009
2011; 96
2007
1994
2005
2003
2002
2008; 123
2003; 11
2010; 82
2009; 77
2010; 43
2004; 18
2010c
2010b
2010a
2009; 8
2006; 142
2008; 20
2003; 61
2001; 34
2010; 9
2009; 17
e_1_2_8_28_1
Irwin D. A. (e_1_2_8_22_1) 2011
e_1_2_8_29_1
e_1_2_8_24_1
e_1_2_8_25_1
e_1_2_8_26_1
e_1_2_8_27_1
Bown C. P. (e_1_2_8_12_1) 2010
e_1_2_8_3_1
e_1_2_8_2_1
e_1_2_8_5_1
e_1_2_8_4_1
e_1_2_8_7_1
e_1_2_8_6_1
e_1_2_8_8_1
e_1_2_8_20_1
Hoekman B. M. (e_1_2_8_21_1) 2009
e_1_2_8_23_1
e_1_2_8_17_1
e_1_2_8_18_1
e_1_2_8_39_1
e_1_2_8_19_1
e_1_2_8_13_1
e_1_2_8_36_1
e_1_2_8_14_1
e_1_2_8_35_1
e_1_2_8_15_1
Egger P. (e_1_2_8_16_1)
e_1_2_8_38_1
Bown C. P. (e_1_2_8_9_1) 2009
e_1_2_8_32_1
e_1_2_8_10_1
e_1_2_8_31_1
e_1_2_8_11_1
e_1_2_8_34_1
e_1_2_8_33_1
de la Torre L. E. R. (e_1_2_8_37_1) 2005
e_1_2_8_30_1
References_xml – reference: Bown, C. P. (2008), 'The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries', Economics and Politics, 20, 2, 255-88.
– reference: Egger, P. and D. Nelson (forthcoming), 'How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data', The Review of Economics and Statistics.
– reference: Ludema, R. D. and A. M. Mayda (2009), 'Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?', Journal of International Economics, 77, 2, 137-50.
– reference: Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2002), The Economics of the World Trading System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
– reference: Staiger, R. W. and A. O. Sykes (2010), ''Currency Manipulation' and World Trade', World Trade Review, 9, 4, 583-627.
– reference: Bown, C. P. and P. Tovar (2011), 'Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India's Tariff Reform', Journal of Development Economics, 96, 1, 115-25.
– reference: Moore, M. O. (2006), 'An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions', Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 142, 1, 122-50.
– reference: Fischer, R. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Contingent Protection as Better Insurance', Review of International Economics, 11, 5, 745-57.
– reference: Irwin, D. A. (2011), Peddling Protectionism: Smoot-Hawley and the Great Depression (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
– reference: Hoekman, B. M. and M. M. Kostecki (2009), The Political Economy of the World Trading System, 3rd edn (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
– reference: Knetter, M. M. and T. J. Prusa (2003), 'Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries', Journal of International Economics, 61, 1, 1-17.
– reference: Moore, M. O. and M. Zanardi (2009), 'Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?', Canadian Journal of Economics, 42, 2, 469-95.
– reference: Messerlin, P. A. (2004), 'China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards', World Bank Economic Review, 18, 1, 105-30.
– reference: Blanchard, E. (2010), 'Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?', Journal of International Economics, 82, 1, 63-72.
– reference: Prusa, T. J. (2001), 'On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping', Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 3, 591-611.
– reference: Vandenbussche, H. and M. Zanardi (2010), 'The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation', European Economic Review, 54, 6, 760-77.
– reference: Zanardi, M. (2004), 'Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?', The World Economy, 27, 3, 403-33.
– reference: Bown, C. P. and M. A. Crowley (2010), 'China's Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System? Canadian Journal of Economics, 43, 4, 1353-88.
– reference: Estevadeordal, A., C. Freund and E. Ornelas (2008), 'Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non-Members?', Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 4, 1531-75.
– reference: Evenett, S. J. (2009), 'Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch', World Trade Review, 8, 4, 607-9.
– reference: Bagwell, K. and R. W. Staiger (2006), 'Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 877-95.
– reference: Reynolds, K. M. (2009), 'From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement', Review of International Economics, 17, 5, 969-85.
– reference: Gallaway, M., B. A. Blonigen and J. Flynn (1999), 'Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law', Journal of International Economics, 49, 2, 211-44.
– reference: Limão, N. (2006), 'Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US', American Economic Review, 96, 3, 896-914.
– reference: Niels, G. and J. Francois (2006), 'Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico', Review of Development Economics, 10, 3, 388-99.
– reference: Staiger, R. W. and F. A. Wolak (1994), 'Measuring Industry-Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States', Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 51-118.
– year: 2011
– volume: 34
  start-page: 591
  issue: 3
  year: 2001
  end-page: 611
  article-title: On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics
– year: 2009
– volume: 11
  start-page: 745
  issue: 5
  year: 2003
  end-page: 57
  article-title: Contingent Protection as Better Insurance
  publication-title: Review of International Economics
– volume: 49
  start-page: 211
  issue: 2
  year: 1999
  end-page: 44
  article-title: Welfare Cost of the US Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Law
  publication-title: Journal of International Economics
– volume: 54
  start-page: 760
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  end-page: 77
  article-title: The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation
  publication-title: European Economic Review
– volume: 82
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Reevaluating the Role of Trade Agreements: Does Investment Globalization Make the WTO Obsolete?
  publication-title: Journal of International Economics
– start-page: 281
  year: 2010c
  end-page: 337
– volume: 18
  start-page: 105
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  end-page: 30
  article-title: China in the World Trade Organization: Antidumping and Safeguards
  publication-title: World Bank Economic Review
– volume: 142
  start-page: 122
  issue: 1
  year: 2006
  end-page: 50
  article-title: An Econometric Analysis of US Antidumping Sunset Review Decisions
  publication-title: Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv
– year: 2010b
– year: 2007
– volume: 9
  start-page: 583
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 627
  article-title: ‘Currency Manipulation’ and World Trade
  publication-title: World Trade Review
– volume: 123
  start-page: 1531
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  end-page: 75
  article-title: Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Non‐Members?
  publication-title: Quarterly Journal of Economics
– volume: 27
  start-page: 403
  issue: 3
  year: 2004
  end-page: 33
  article-title: Antidumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?
  publication-title: The World Economy
– year: 2010a
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 17
  article-title: Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping Filings: Evidence from Four Countries
  publication-title: Journal of International Economics
– start-page: 205
  year: 2005
  end-page: 46
– volume: 43
  start-page: 1353
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  end-page: 88
  article-title: China’s Export Growth and the China Safeguard: Threats to the World Trading System?
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics
– volume: 10
  start-page: 388
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 99
  article-title: Business Cycles, the Exchange Rate, and Demand for Antidumping Protection in Mexico
  publication-title: Review of Development Economics
– article-title: How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data
  publication-title: The Review of Economics and Statistics
– start-page: 51
  year: 1994
  end-page: 118
  article-title: Measuring Industry‐Specific Protection: Antidumping in the United States
  publication-title: Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics
– year: 2010
– volume: 42
  start-page: 469
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 95
  article-title: Does Antidumping Use Contribute to Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries?
  publication-title: Canadian Journal of Economics
– year: 2002
– volume: 20
  start-page: 255
  issue: 2
  year: 2008
  end-page: 88
  article-title: The WTO and Antidumping in Developing Countries
  publication-title: Economics and Politics
– volume: 96
  start-page: 115
  year: 2011
  end-page: 25
  article-title: Trade Liberalization, Antidumping and Safeguards: Evidence from India’s Tariff Reform
  publication-title: Journal of Development Economics
– volume: 17
  start-page: 969
  issue: 5
  year: 2009
  end-page: 85
  article-title: From Agreement to Application: An Analysis of Determinations under the WTO Antidumping Agreement
  publication-title: Review of International Economics
– start-page: 251
  year: 2003
  end-page: 84
– start-page: 91
  year: 2009
  end-page: 118
– volume: 96
  start-page: 896
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 914
  article-title: Preferential Trade Agreements as Stumbling Blocks for Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Evidence for the US
  publication-title: American Economic Review
– volume: 77
  start-page: 137
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  end-page: 50
  article-title: Do Countries Free Ride on MFN?
  publication-title: Journal of International Economics
– volume: 96
  start-page: 877
  issue: 3
  year: 2006
  end-page: 95
  article-title: Will International Rules on Subsidies Disrupt the World Trading System?
  publication-title: American Economic Review
– volume: 8
  start-page: 607
  issue: 4
  year: 2009
  end-page: 9
  article-title: Global Trade Alert: Motivation and Launch
  publication-title: World Trade Review
– ident: e_1_2_8_24_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(02)00080-6
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0343.2008.00331.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01617.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_1
  article-title: How Bad is Antidumping?: Evidence from Panel Data
  publication-title: The Review of Economics and Statistics
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9396.2003.00415.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_1
  doi: 10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1531
– ident: e_1_2_8_36_1
  doi: 10.2307/2534729
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_1
– start-page: 281
  volume-title: China’s Growing Role in World Trade
  year: 2010
  ident: e_1_2_8_12_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_1
  doi: 10.7551/mitpress/2628.001.0001
– ident: e_1_2_8_25_1
  doi: 10.1257/aer.96.3.896
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_1
  doi: 10.1002/9780470756461.ch9
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.04.006
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_30_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01516.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_31_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9361.2006.00339.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_1
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00063-4
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.06.001
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_1
  doi: 10.1257/aer.96.3.877
– ident: e_1_2_8_27_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.08.004
– ident: e_1_2_8_34_1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1513927
– ident: e_1_2_8_39_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2004.00605.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_33_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2008.00797.x
– ident: e_1_2_8_35_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1474745610000340
– start-page: 205
  volume-title: Safeguards and Antidumping in Latin American Trade Liberalization: Fighting Fire with Fire
  year: 2005
  ident: e_1_2_8_37_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_23_1
– start-page: 91
  volume-title: Effective Crisis Response and Openness: Implications for the Trading System
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_9_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1474745609990061
– ident: e_1_2_8_28_1
  doi: 10.1093/wber/lhh032
– ident: e_1_2_8_38_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.01.003
– volume-title: The Political Economy of the World Trading System
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_8_21_1
  doi: 10.1093/oso/9780199553761.001.0001
– volume-title: Peddling Protectionism: Smoot‐Hawley and the Great Depression
  year: 2011
  ident: e_1_2_8_22_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_26_1
– ident: e_1_2_8_29_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10290-006-0059-7
– ident: e_1_2_8_32_1
  doi: 10.1111/0008-4085.00090
SSID ssj0016420
Score 2.3046074
Snippet This article examines the evolving, cross‐country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies – temporary trade barriers (TTBs) – over the...
This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies -- temporary trade barriers (TTBs) -- over the...
This article examines the evolving, cross-country use of antidumping, safeguard and countervailing duty policies - temporary trade barriers (TTBs) - over the...
SourceID proquest
econis
crossref
wiley
istex
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1955
SubjectTerms 1990-2009
Anti dumping
Anti-dumping policy
Antidumping
China
China (People's Republic)
Countervailing duties
Cross-national analysis
Data Banks
Economic conditions
Economic Crises
Economic crisis
Economic development
European Union
Exports
Exports and Imports
Handelshemmnisse
Peoples Republic of China
Stocks
Studies
Subsidies
Trade barriers
Trade Policy
Trends
United States
United States of America
Welt
World Bank
Title Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990-2009
URI https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/WNG-W8WGZCS6-P/fulltext.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.2011.01388.x
http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=68608585X
https://www.proquest.com/docview/914160222
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1000947320
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1023024210
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1728650120
Volume 34
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1di9QwFA2yiPqy6qpsd1UiiE_boWnSpHlcxv1AcBBnlhl8CUnTLsNIR7YdWHzyP_gP_SXe2y8clWUR30LbFHJ7b3JOc-8JIa8LKRSgfpj9mM9DIb0IrY5dWESp0D5j2nOsHX4_kecX4t0iWXT5T1gL0-pDDD_cMDKa-RoD3LrqzyDXKmKdEifjaTpCPImpW4iPPg5KUkAKWoVGDqQp0XG0ndTz1xdtrVR3kZ4uK4CwaP3rLTz6K6ptlqXTh2TVD6jNRlmNNrUbZV9_03r8PyN-RHY79EqPW3d7TO7k5R651yfP75H7fZ1z9YRMZs1BV3Raw5RL1wU9LuulB--Bi0d0aov8Et2zorb0FEvjMfnSLrE8nr7doM7rEWWwiv349h33Vp6Si9OT2fg87E5vCDMJKCC03LokE0LZgjNv4zy2eVxYBg3lEmB9qbIsi6zNVeaKhPtMM-ukTIUX8JUkf0Z2ynWZ7xPKudVeW49FsyJXFpqpRqkxF8cOWHZAVP-lTNZJm-MJG5_NFsVRBk1n0HSmMZ25Dggben5p5T1u0We_dYahh0xlhPuri4C8adxjuGOvVpg5pxIzn5yZeTo_-zSeSvMhIIe9_5hu0qiMZoCOkYAH5NVwF6Idt3Bsma83FSpMAx9XPI5uegZoJe703_SMwopkLJwG2zU-d-vhm9n8ZIzNg3_ueUgeNL_mm6yg52SnvtrkLwDb1e5lE7U_ARI4OvA
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELZQQZRLgQJqWn6MhDg1qzhO7PhYLW0XaFeI3WpXXCwndtCqVRY1WanixDvwhjwJM_kTC6iqEDcriSN5PGPPZ898Q8irXEQSvH5Y_Zh1fiRs5BsVpn4eJJGyGVOWY-7w6ViMzqJ383jelgPCXJiGH6I_cEPLqNdrNHA8kP7TypUMWEvFyXiSDMChvI0Fvmt89bHnkgJY0HA0coBNsQqD9bCev_5pba-6gwB1UYITi_K_WvNIf_Vr643p6D656IbUxKOcD1ZVOsi-_sb2-J_G_IBstQ4sPWg07iG55YptcreLn98mm12qc_mIjKd1rSs6qWDVpcucHhTVwoICwcN9OjG5-4waWlJTWIrZ8Rh_aRaYIU_frJDqdZ8y2Mh-fPuO1yuPydnR4XQ48tsCDn4mwBHwDTdpnEWRNDln1oQuNC7MDYOGTGMAfok0LAuMcTJL85jbTDGTCpFENoJpEvwJ2SiWhdshlHOjrDIW82YjJw00E4VsY2kYpgC0PSK7qdJZy26ORTYu9BrKkRpFp1F0uhadvvII63t-aRg-btBnp9GGvodIRIBXrHOPvK71o39jLs8xeE7GejY-1rNkdvxpOBH6g0f2OgXS7bpRasXAQUYM7pGX_VsweLzFMYVbrkokmQZILnkYXPcNIEu87L_uG4lJyZg7DbKrle7Gw9fT2eEQm7v_3PMF2RxNT0_0ydvx-z1yrz6pr4OEnpKN6nLlnoGrV6XPaxP-CchcPws
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1bb9MwFLbQQIOXAQO0bFyChHhaqjh27PhxateNWzXRTq14sZzYQVVROq2pNPHEf-Af8ks4JzdRQNOEeLOSOJJPzrG_Lz7nMyGvcsEloH6Y_ah1AReWB0ZFaZCHCVc2o8oyrB3-MBKn5_ztLJ41-U9YC1PrQ3Q_3DAyqvkaA_zC5n8GuZIhbZQ4KUuSHuDJ21yECXr44GMnJQWsoJZoZMCaYhWFm1k9f33TxlJ1B_npfAUYFs1_tQFIf4W11bo0vE8W7YjqdJRFb12mvezrb2KP_2fID8hOA1_9o9rfHpJbrtgl2232_C652xY6rx6R0aQ66coflzDn-svcPyrKuQX3gYuH_tjk7jP658o3hfWxNh6zL80c6-P9wRqFXg99CsvYj2_fcXPlMTkfHk_6p0FzfEOQCYABgWEmjTPOpckZtSZykXFRbig0ZBoD7UukoVlojJNZmsfMZoqaVIiEWw5fSbAnZKtYFm6P-IwZZZWxWDXLnTTQTBRqjaVRlALN9ohsv5TOGm1zPGLji97gOFKj6TSaTlem01ceoV3Pi1rf4wZ99mpn6HqIBDwOiNfMI68r9-jumMsFps7JWE9HJ3qaTE8-9cdCn3nkoPUf3cwaK60owGNk4B552d2FcMc9HFO45XqFEtNAyCWLwuueAV6JW_3XPSOxJBkrp8F2lc_dePh6Mj3uY3P_n3u-INtng6F-_2b07oDcq37TVxlCT8lWebl2zwDnlenzKoB_AtrBPcM
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Taking+Stock+of+Antidumping%2C+Safeguards+and+Countervailing+Duties%2C+1990-2009&rft.jtitle=World+economy&rft.au=Bown%2C+Chad+P&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.issn=0378-5920&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1955&rft.epage=1998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1467-9701.2011.01388.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0378-5920&client=summon