Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upp...
Saved in:
| Published in | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 57 - 20 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
25.04.2020
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery.
The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke.
A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I
= 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I
= 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I
= 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model).
The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery.
The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke.
A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I
= 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I
= 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I
= 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model).
The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. Abstract Background A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery. Methods The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke. Results A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.66; I 2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = − 0.28 – 0.52; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = − 0.30; 95% CI = − 0.96 – 0.36; I 2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model). Conclusion The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery.BACKGROUNDA substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery.The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke.METHODSThe databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke.A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model).RESULTSA total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model).The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network.CONCLUSIONThe use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. Background A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery. Methods The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke. Results A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I.sup.2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I.sup.2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I.sup.2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model). Conclusion The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. Keywords: Brain-computer interface, Stroke, Hemiparetic upper extremity function, Motor imagery, Movement attempt, Neural mechanism A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery. The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke. A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18-0.66; I.sup.2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = - 0.28 - 0.52; I.sup.2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = - 0.30; 95% CI = - 0.96 - 0.36; I.sup.2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model). The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. Background A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients after stroke. The objective of this review is to evaluate the effect sizes of clinical studies investigating the use of BCIs in restoring upper extremity function after stroke and the potentiating effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on BCI training for motor recovery. Methods The databases (PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, and PEDro) were systematically searched for eligible single-group or clinical controlled studies regarding the effects of BCIs in hemiparetic upper extremity recovery after stroke. Single-group studies were qualitatively described, but only controlled-trial studies were included in the meta-analysis. The PEDro scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the controlled studies. A meta-analysis of upper extremity function was performed by pooling the standardized mean difference (SMD). Subgroup meta-analyses regarding the use of external devices in combination with the application of BCIs were also carried out. We summarized the neural mechanism of the use of BCIs on stroke. Results A total of 1015 records were screened. Eighteen single-group studies and 15 controlled studies were included. The studies showed that BCIs seem to be safe for patients with stroke. The single-group studies consistently showed a trend that suggested BCIs were effective in improving upper extremity function. The meta-analysis (of 12 studies) showed a medium effect size favoring BCIs for improving upper extremity function after intervention (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.18–0.66; I2 = 48%; P < 0.001; fixed-effects model), while the long-term effect (five studies) was not significant (SMD = 0.12; 95% CI = − 0.28 – 0.52; I2 = 0%; P = 0.540; fixed-effects model). A subgroup meta-analysis indicated that using functional electrical stimulation as the external device in BCI training was more effective than using other devices (P = 0.010). Using movement attempts as the trigger task in BCI training appears to be more effective than using motor imagery (P = 0.070). The use of tDCS (two studies) could not further facilitate the effects of BCI training to restore upper extremity motor function (SMD = − 0.30; 95% CI = − 0.96 – 0.36; I2 = 0%; P = 0.370; fixed-effects model). Conclusion The use of BCIs has significant immediate effects on the improvement of hemiparetic upper extremity function in patients after stroke, but the limited number of studies does not support its long-term effects. BCIs combined with functional electrical stimulation may be a better combination for functional recovery than other kinds of neural feedback. The mechanism for functional recovery may be attributed to the activation of the ipsilesional premotor and sensorimotor cortical network. |
| ArticleNumber | 57 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Fong, Kenneth N. K. Bai, Zhongfei Chan, Josephine Zhang, Jack Jiaqi Ting, K. H. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Zhongfei surname: Bai fullname: Bai, Zhongfei – sequence: 2 givenname: Kenneth N. K. surname: Fong fullname: Fong, Kenneth N. K. – sequence: 3 givenname: Jack Jiaqi surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Jack Jiaqi – sequence: 4 givenname: Josephine surname: Chan fullname: Chan, Josephine – sequence: 5 givenname: K. H. surname: Ting fullname: Ting, K. H. |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334608$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9ksuO0zAUhiM0iJkpvAALZIkNmwy-xUlZIA0Vl0ojsYG1deIcty5JXGx3oC_Ac-NeGKYjhLKIY3_n9_lP_svibPQjFsVzRq8Ya9TryPi0kSXltKRUNarkj4oLVkuRP6k4u7c-Ly5jXOWFpJV8UpwLLoRUtLkofs2HATsHCQmMHen9uCgThoGgtWhSJN6Sd7N52ULEjgRcQut6lyA5P-7O0hLJZr3GQPBnCji4tCVgswKJKfhv-IYAiduYcMglJgvcOvyxv2rABCWM0G-ji0-Lxxb6iM-O70nx9cP7L7NP5c3nj_PZ9U1pVF2n0jSKQ-5cMCupFFh3RvLaCASoG2CWGYN1U1UMRWONtZ2iqgPVUl5RMwUrJsX8oNt5WOl1cAOErfbg9H7Dh4WGkBvtUcsKJUdsG6OUBAMNtoj1tJIAnFMps9bbg9Z60-YZGhxTgP5E9PRkdEu98Le6Zo1QrM4Cr44CwX_fYEx6cNFg38OIfhM1F9OKZwfTHfryAbrym5CHl6ndJKaK8-ovtYBswI3W53vNTlRfK16LmilJM3X1Dyo_Xf59JkfMurx_UvDivtE7h39SlAF-AEzwMQa0dwijehdVfYiqzlHV-6hmb5OieVBkjrnK7bj-f6W_AXR17gU |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_1041978 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1376782 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11055_023_01552_z crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12112607 crossref_primary_10_3390_mti5030012 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2025_3529357 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_699428 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1241081 crossref_primary_10_3390_s20133754 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac1177 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neuroimage_2023_120000 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_023_01129_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nicl_2020_102417 crossref_primary_10_3390_bioengineering10101162 crossref_primary_10_1089_cyber_2020_0231 crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2022_3185262 crossref_primary_10_1136_svn_2022_001506 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42600_023_00329_0 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci13010056 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2023_105745 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_725645 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41597_024_04012_6 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_9967348 crossref_primary_10_12786_bn_2022_15_e12 crossref_primary_10_2302_kjm_2022_0002_OA crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2022_3188103 crossref_primary_10_31857_S0044467723040032 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbot_2022_873239 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac5757 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0264354 crossref_primary_10_1177_15459683221138751 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbot_2022_971547 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bspc_2022_104454 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_917909 crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2024_2409463 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_725715 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_abee51 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_949575 crossref_primary_10_1177_20406223211063059 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1086472 crossref_primary_10_31083_j_jin2307125 crossref_primary_10_3390_s21062065 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_59314 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2024_1346050 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_022_01081_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_809657 crossref_primary_10_1080_10400435_2020_1836067 crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare11192653 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinph_2022_03_002 crossref_primary_10_2340_jrm_cc_v8_42941 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2024_3384559 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2024_1438095 crossref_primary_10_2490_jjrmc_57_956 crossref_primary_10_1177_02692155231200086 crossref_primary_10_1152_jn_00452_2024 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2021_764281 crossref_primary_10_3389_frobt_2020_00088 crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2024_2401918 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_975410 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2021_766879 crossref_primary_10_1109_TETCI_2022_3147225 crossref_primary_10_1113_JP281314 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000001267 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_025_01597_w crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_acd0d6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2023_1221160 crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_6631835 crossref_primary_10_1177_15500594211009065 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_20345_x crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2022_3198434 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_concog_2023_103531 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19159112 crossref_primary_10_3389_fncel_2021_653487 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11055_023_01436_2 crossref_primary_10_3724_SP_J_1329_2023_06013 crossref_primary_10_3389_fncom_2024_1431815 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci14070643 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnrgo_2022_1082901 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_1009878 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41597_023_02260_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_life13020303 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apmr_2024_04_001 crossref_primary_10_12677_acm_2024_14123104 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3383847 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac7004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chb_2023_107789 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neurom_2023_10_006 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01535_2 crossref_primary_10_1177_15459683211062895 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2024_1486167 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2023_1135466 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medj_2024_02_014 crossref_primary_10_14412_2074_2711_2024_5_17_23 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2022_964196 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_023_01301_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobme_2021_100354 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2020_554089 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12938_023_01091_1 crossref_primary_10_4103_ATN_ATN_D_24_00018 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbot_2021_706630 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bios_2025_117321 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ac49a6 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1146146 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnrt_2023_100071 crossref_primary_10_1109_JETCAS_2023_3265928 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2024_1346607 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_023_04319_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11370_022_00435_5 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2023_1117670 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11055_022_01333_0 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42600_023_00284_w crossref_primary_10_1080_17483107_2022_2060354 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_ad19ea crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2025_1525293 crossref_primary_10_3389_fstro_2025_1547280 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2023_1121481 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12216734 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_798883 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 10.1007/s11055-016-0270-5 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2908125 10.1177/1545968319827573 10.1155/2019/7084618 10.1159/000363763 10.1098/rstb.2016.0260 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.023 10.1038/nature13276 10.1109/TBME.2019.2921198 10.1038/nrn.2016.164 10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.008 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.008 10.1007/s00221-014-4183-7 10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181c1fc0b 10.1155/2018/2321045 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.013 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4 10.1177/2055668318789280 10.1152/jn.00918.2015 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000035 10.3389/fnins.2018.00752 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025020 10.1177/1545968314565510 10.1073/pnas.0913697107 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.026 10.2340/16501977-2275 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.021 10.1002/ana.25452 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.03.005 10.1371/journal.pone.0044558 10.1310/tsr2102-137 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000200 10.1088/1741-2552/aad724 10.1177/1550059414522229 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009233 10.3389/fnins.2017.00400 10.1088/1741-2522/aa5d5f 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.09.008 10.1002/acn3.544 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.055 10.1002/ana.23879 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.003 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 10.1016/j.brs.2015.09.002 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313 10.3109/00207454.2013.850082 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.011 10.3389/fnins.2011.00039 10.1002/ana.24390 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2249111 10.1258/0007142001903120 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017 10.1186/1743-0003-7-27 10.1186/1743-0003-7-60 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.139 10.1073/pnas.1221127110 10.1002/oti.1403 10.1152/jn.00949.2014 10.1002/oti.1422 10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-02 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x 10.1177/1545968312445910 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.016 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.654228 10.1002/ana.21393 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016304 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030 10.1177/1545968306294729 10.3389/fneng.2014.00019 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674507 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2863212 10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.002 10.1038/35101651 10.1007/s10548-013-0299-5 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7 10.2340/16501977-1925 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 3V. 7QO 7RV 7TB 7TK 7TS 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABJCF ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ K9. KB0 L6V LK8 M0S M0T M1P M7P M7S NAPCQ P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PTHSS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00686-2 |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Database Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts Neurosciences Abstracts Physical Education Index Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Engineering Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Biological Science Database Engineering Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China Engineering Collection MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Open Access资源_DOAJ |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Engineering Collection Engineering Database ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection Physical Education Index ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Engineering Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library Materials Science & Engineering Collection ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine Engineering Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation Physical Therapy |
| EISSN | 1743-0003 |
| EndPage | 20 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_45e42eeb8c664aca8ebee7954aa22044 PMC7183617 A627371640 32334608 10_1186_s12984_020_00686_2 |
| Genre | Journal Article Review |
| GeographicLocations | Morocco |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Morocco |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities grantid: 22120180401 – fundername: Departmental Research Grant, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University grantid: ZVNX – fundername: ; grantid: 22120180401 – fundername: ; grantid: ZVNX |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29L 2QV 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 7RV 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABJCF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE I-F IAO IHR INH INR IPY ITC KQ8 L6V LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M7S ML0 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PTHSS RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB ~8M -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 NPM PMFND 7QO 7TB 7TK 7TS 7XB 8FD 8FK AZQEC DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ K9. P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-c862a34631f4043e7dc427c3eaa78a1f1cce78551e38fcffd606da6b0250c9af3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1743-0003 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:57:23 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:10:45 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:20:31 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:12:01 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:35:07 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:33:16 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:59:09 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:19:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:06 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Brain-computer interface Movement attempt Stroke Motor imagery Hemiparetic upper extremity function Neural mechanism |
| Language | English |
| License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c677t-c862a34631f4043e7dc427c3eaa78a1f1cce78551e38fcffd606da6b0250c9af3 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-3 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12984-020-00686-2 |
| PMID | 32334608 |
| PQID | 2404396225 |
| PQPubID | 55356 |
| PageCount | 20 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_45e42eeb8c664aca8ebee7954aa22044 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7183617 proquest_miscellaneous_2395260697 proquest_journals_2404396225 gale_infotracmisc_A627371640 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A627371640 pubmed_primary_32334608 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_020_00686_2 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12984_020_00686_2 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2020-04-25 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-04-25 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2020 text: 2020-04-25 day: 25 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Neuroeng Rehabil |
| PublicationYear | 2020 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | C Ruffino (686_CR25) 2017; 341 E Buch (686_CR56) 2008; 39 SV Kotov (686_CR60) 2016; 46 B Varkuti (686_CR49) 2013; 27 AA Frolov (686_CR74) 2016; 2 A Thibaut (686_CR84) 2013; 27 S Halder (686_CR89) 2011; 55 KJ Miller (686_CR8) 2010; 107 SC Cramer (686_CR2) 2008; 63 J Matsumoto (686_CR39) 2010; 7 M Acciarresi (686_CR72) 2014; 72 P Wei (686_CR40) 2013; 21 N Birbaumer (686_CR9) 2007; 579 S Bestmann (686_CR93) 2015; 233 CW Wu (686_CR78) 2005; 27 J Xu (686_CR98) 2019; 85 686_CR13 H Thieme (686_CR19) 2018; 7 SM Rayegani (686_CR47) 2014; 21 LEH van Dokkum (686_CR36) 2015; 58 KK Ang (686_CR54) 2015; 96 A Chowdhury (686_CR65) 2018; 22 686_CR12 Y Jeon (686_CR24) 2011; 41 PY Chhatbar (686_CR44) 2016; 9 MA Cervera (686_CR20) 2018; 5 XL Hu (686_CR33) 2015; 29 KE Laver (686_CR18) 2017; 11 MN McDonnell (686_CR92) 2017; 10 A Nishimoto (686_CR64) 2018; 50 686_CR68 M Mihara (686_CR35) 2013; 44 686_CR69 A Ramos-Murguialday (686_CR53) 2019; 33 686_CR66 686_CR63 OA Howlett (686_CR77) 2015; 96 H Rodgers (686_CR34) 2019; 394 NC Foley (686_CR43) 2003; 10 N Sharma (686_CR21) 2006; 37 G Pfurtscheller (686_CR23) 2006; 31 S Shoham (686_CR27) 2001; 413 D Moher (686_CR41) 2009; 151 YW Hsieh (686_CR85) 2007; 21 I Petrof (686_CR79) 2015; 113 G Kwakkel (686_CR4) 2015; 14 T Asai (686_CR81) 2015; 38 AB Remsik (686_CR67) 2018; 12 686_CR70 PJ Dean (686_CR91) 2012; 7 EW Sellers (686_CR5) 2006; 117 F Pichiorri (686_CR96) 2011; 8 S Hétu (686_CR22) 2013; 37 ZF Guerra (686_CR75) 2017; 41 M Li (686_CR6) 2014; 124 G Pfurtscheller (686_CR11) 1999; 110 T Ono (686_CR37) 2014; 7 YY Jang (686_CR46) 2016; 23 D Rathee (686_CR71) 2019; 27 Y Kasashima-Shindo (686_CR55) 2015; 47 AJ Fink (686_CR80) 2014; 509 JJ Daly (686_CR14) 2009; 33 BJ Jeon (686_CR3) 2015; 22 JJ Daly (686_CR83) 2008; 7 K Sugawara (686_CR90) 2013; 26 KK Ang (686_CR50) 2014; 7 G Bi (686_CR28) 2001; 24 MA Nitsche (686_CR38) 2000; 527 G Morone (686_CR58) 2015; 96 A Ramos-Murguialday (686_CR15) 2013; 74 686_CR57 M Kawakami (686_CR59) 2016; 34 R Sitaram (686_CR82) 2016; 18 CD Wolfe (686_CR1) 2000; 56 J Cohen (686_CR73) 1988 BM Young (686_CR97) 2014; 7 N Mrachacz-Kersting (686_CR95) 2016; 115 AM Moseley (686_CR42) 2002; 48 DT Bundy (686_CR61) 2017; 48 Review Manager (RevMan) [Computer Program] (686_CR48) 2014 G Prasad (686_CR26) 2010; 7 A Muralidharan (686_CR30) 2011; 5 T Wieloch (686_CR86) 2006; 16 J Mehrholz (686_CR76) 2018; 9 DB Popović (686_CR32) 2014; 24 T Kim (686_CR51) 2016; 23 J Ibáñez (686_CR62) 2017; 11 M Pekna (686_CR87) 2012; 43 AA Frolov (686_CR52) 2017; 11 KK Ang (686_CR7) 2015; 46 J Higgins (686_CR45) 2011 JP Bembenek (686_CR94) 2012; 27 Y Blokland (686_CR31) 2012; 2012 A Biasiucci (686_CR16) 2018; 9 JD Wander (686_CR88) 2013; 110 F Pichiorri (686_CR17) 2015; 77 JR Wolpaw (686_CR10) 2002; 113 686_CR29 |
| References_xml | – volume: 7 start-page: 1032 year: 2008 ident: 686_CR83 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70223-0 – volume: 27 start-page: 1093 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR84 publication-title: Brain Inj doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.804202 – volume: 151 start-page: 264 year: 2009 ident: 686_CR41 publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135 – volume: 46 start-page: 518 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR60 publication-title: Neurosci Behav Physiol doi: 10.1007/s11055-016-0270-5 – volume: 27 start-page: 1020 year: 2019 ident: 686_CR71 publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2908125 – volume: 33 start-page: 188 year: 2019 ident: 686_CR53 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968319827573 – ident: 686_CR69 doi: 10.1155/2019/7084618 – volume: 72 start-page: 255 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR72 publication-title: Eur Neurol doi: 10.1159/000363763 – volume: 2012 start-page: 3967 year: 2012 ident: 686_CR31 publication-title: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. – ident: 686_CR29 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0260 – volume: 48 start-page: 43 year: 2002 ident: 686_CR42 publication-title: Aust J Physiother doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60281-6 – volume: 11 start-page: 126 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR62 publication-title: Front Neurosci – volume: 117 start-page: 538 year: 2006 ident: 686_CR5 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.06.027 – volume: 341 start-page: 61 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR25 publication-title: Neuroscience. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.023 – volume: 7 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR19 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 509 start-page: 43 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR80 publication-title: Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature13276 – volume: 34 start-page: 789 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR59 publication-title: Restor Neurol Neurosci – ident: 686_CR70 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2019.2921198 – volume-title: Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1. 0 (updated March 2011) year: 2011 ident: 686_CR45 – volume: 18 start-page: 86 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR82 publication-title: Nat Rev Neurosci doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.164 – volume: 10 start-page: 721 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR92 publication-title: Brain Stimul. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.03.008 – volume: 96 start-page: S79 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR54 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.08.008 – volume: 233 start-page: 679 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR93 publication-title: Exp Brain Res doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4183-7 – volume: 9 start-page: 2421 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR16 publication-title: Nat Commun doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04673-z – volume: 579 start-page: 621 year: 2007 ident: 686_CR9 publication-title: J Physiol doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125633 – volume: 33 start-page: 203 year: 2009 ident: 686_CR14 publication-title: J Neurol Phys Ther doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181c1fc0b – ident: 686_CR12 doi: 10.1155/2018/2321045 – volume: 96 start-page: 934 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR77 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.01.013 – volume: 394 start-page: 51 year: 2019 ident: 686_CR34 publication-title: Lancet. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4 – ident: 686_CR68 doi: 10.1177/2055668318789280 – volume: 115 start-page: 1410 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR95 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/jn.00918.2015 – volume: 22 start-page: 34 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR3 publication-title: Top Stroke Rehabil doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000035 – volume: 12 start-page: 752 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR67 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00752 – volume: 8 start-page: 025020 year: 2011 ident: 686_CR96 publication-title: J Neural Eng doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025020 – volume: 29 start-page: 767 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR33 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968314565510 – volume: 107 start-page: 4430 year: 2010 ident: 686_CR8 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913697107 – volume: 96 start-page: S71 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR58 publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.026 – volume: 27 start-page: 79 year: 2012 ident: 686_CR94 publication-title: Funct Neurol – volume: 50 start-page: 52 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR64 publication-title: J Rehabil Med doi: 10.2340/16501977-2275 – volume: 55 start-page: 1779 year: 2011 ident: 686_CR89 publication-title: Neuroimage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.021 – volume: 85 start-page: 502 year: 2019 ident: 686_CR98 publication-title: Ann Neurol doi: 10.1002/ana.25452 – volume: 9 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR76 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 41 start-page: 428 year: 2011 ident: 686_CR24 publication-title: Int J Ind Ergonom doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.03.005 – volume: 7 year: 2012 ident: 686_CR91 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044558 – volume: 11 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR18 publication-title: Cochrane Database Syst Rev – volume: 21 start-page: 137 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR47 publication-title: Top Stroke Rehabil doi: 10.1310/tsr2102-137 – volume: 41 start-page: 205 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR75 publication-title: J Neurol Phys doi: 10.1097/NPT.0000000000000200 – volume: 7 start-page: 26 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR97 publication-title: Front Neuroeng. – ident: 686_CR66 doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aad724 – volume: 46 start-page: 310 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR7 publication-title: Clin EEG Neurosci doi: 10.1177/1550059414522229 – ident: 686_CR63 doi: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009233 – volume: 11 start-page: 400 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR52 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00400 – ident: 686_CR13 doi: 10.1088/1741-2522/aa5d5f – volume: 24 start-page: 795 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR32 publication-title: J Electromyogr Kinesiol doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.09.008 – volume: 5 start-page: 651 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR20 publication-title: Ann of Clin Transl Neurol doi: 10.1002/acn3.544 – volume: 27 start-page: 872 year: 2005 ident: 686_CR78 publication-title: Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.055 – volume: 74 start-page: 100 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR15 publication-title: Ann Neurol doi: 10.1002/ana.23879 – volume-title: Version 5.3 Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration year: 2014 ident: 686_CR48 – volume: 31 start-page: 153 year: 2006 ident: 686_CR23 publication-title: Neuroimage. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.003 – volume: 113 start-page: 767 year: 2002 ident: 686_CR10 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00057-3 – volume: 110 start-page: 1842 year: 1999 ident: 686_CR11 publication-title: Clin Neurophysiol doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8 – volume: 9 start-page: 16 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR44 publication-title: Brain Stimul doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.09.002 – volume: 39 start-page: 910 year: 2008 ident: 686_CR56 publication-title: Stroke. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.505313 – volume: 124 start-page: 403 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR6 publication-title: Int J Neurosci doi: 10.3109/00207454.2013.850082 – volume: 16 start-page: 258 year: 2006 ident: 686_CR86 publication-title: Curr Opin Neurobiol doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.05.011 – volume: 5 start-page: 39 year: 2011 ident: 686_CR30 publication-title: Front Neurosci doi: 10.3389/fnins.2011.00039 – volume: 77 start-page: 851 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR17 publication-title: Ann Neurol doi: 10.1002/ana.24390 – volume: 21 start-page: 404 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR40 publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2249111 – volume: 56 start-page: 275 year: 2000 ident: 686_CR1 publication-title: Br Med Bull doi: 10.1258/0007142001903120 – volume: 37 start-page: 930 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR22 publication-title: Neurosci Biobehav Rev doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.03.017 – volume: 7 start-page: 27 year: 2010 ident: 686_CR39 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-27 – volume: 7 start-page: 60 year: 2010 ident: 686_CR26 publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-7-60 – volume: 37 start-page: 1941 year: 2006 ident: 686_CR21 publication-title: Stroke. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc – volume: 24 start-page: 139 year: 2001 ident: 686_CR28 publication-title: Annu Rev Neurosci doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.139 – volume: 110 start-page: 10818 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR88 publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A doi: 10.1073/pnas.1221127110 – volume: 23 start-page: 39 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR51 publication-title: Occup Ther Int doi: 10.1002/oti.1403 – volume: 113 start-page: 2400 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR79 publication-title: J Neurophysiol doi: 10.1152/jn.00949.2014 – volume: 23 start-page: 175 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR46 publication-title: Occup Ther Int doi: 10.1002/oti.1422 – volume: 2 start-page: 16 year: 2016 ident: 686_CR74 publication-title: Bulletin Of RSMU doi: 10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-02 – volume: 527 start-page: 633 year: 2000 ident: 686_CR38 publication-title: J Physiol doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x – volume: 27 start-page: 53 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR49 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968312445910 – volume: 58 start-page: 3 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR36 publication-title: Ann Phys Rehabil Med doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.016 – volume: 43 start-page: 2819 year: 2012 ident: 686_CR87 publication-title: Stroke. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.654228 – volume: 63 start-page: 272 year: 2008 ident: 686_CR2 publication-title: Ann Neurol doi: 10.1002/ana.21393 – volume: 48 start-page: 1908 year: 2017 ident: 686_CR61 publication-title: Stroke. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016304 – volume: 7 start-page: 30 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR50 publication-title: Front Neuroeng. doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00030 – volume: 21 start-page: 233 year: 2007 ident: 686_CR85 publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair doi: 10.1177/1545968306294729 – volume: 7 start-page: 19 year: 2014 ident: 686_CR37 publication-title: Front Neuroeng doi: 10.3389/fneng.2014.00019 – volume: 44 start-page: 1091 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR35 publication-title: Stroke. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674507 – volume-title: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences year: 1988 ident: 686_CR73 – volume: 22 start-page: 1786 year: 2018 ident: 686_CR65 publication-title: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2863212 – volume: 38 start-page: 118 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR81 publication-title: Conscious Cogn doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.11.002 – volume: 413 start-page: 793 year: 2001 ident: 686_CR27 publication-title: Nature. doi: 10.1038/35101651 – volume: 10 start-page: 1 year: 2003 ident: 686_CR43 publication-title: Top Stroke Rehabil – volume: 26 start-page: 581 year: 2013 ident: 686_CR90 publication-title: Brain Topogr doi: 10.1007/s10548-013-0299-5 – ident: 686_CR57 – volume: 14 start-page: 224 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR4 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7 – volume: 47 start-page: 318 year: 2015 ident: 686_CR55 publication-title: J Rehabil Med doi: 10.2340/16501977-1925 |
| SSID | ssj0034054 |
| Score | 2.586761 |
| SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
| Snippet | A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology in patients... Background A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI) technology... Abstract Background A substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated the functional recovery induced by the use of brain-computer interface (BCI)... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 57 |
| SubjectTerms | Activities of daily living Analysis Brain Brain-computer interface Clinical outcomes Computer applications Direct current Electrical stimulation of the brain Electrical stimuli Electroencephalography ESB Feedback Hemiparetic upper extremity function Human-computer interface Imagery Implants Long-term effects Medical imaging Medical research Mental task performance Meta-analysis Motor imagery Movement attempt Muscle contraction Neural mechanism Patients Quality assessment Recovery Recovery of function Rehabilitation Review Sensorimotor system Spasticity Stimulation Stroke Subgroups Systematic review Training |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Open Access资源_DOAJ dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwEB6hHhAceCyvQEFG4nFAVrO24zjc2oqqRSpCqJV6s2zHAUQ3WWWzf4HfzdhJlkRIcOEaTx72jGe-UWY-A7wSDv2hN6EuTCoqMMRQm7mCclmmpbVCiEhgev5Jnl6Kj1fZ1eSor1AT1tMD9wt3IDIvmPdWOSmFcUbhW31eZMIYxlIRmUAx5o3JVO-DOcIQMbbIKHmwwaimBA2pUuyJoGwWhiJb_58-eRKU5gWTkwh0cg_uDNCRHPaffB9u-HoBtyeEggu4eT78Kl_A6yl_MLnoyQPIG_JlRs29gLufB02NMg_g59kqNpR0npi6JNdN_ZUGD06G4g_SVOTo-IyGCFiSdvbAMIaYkmzXa98S9PytXyHQJ_EscrLp2uaHf08M-c0gTfrumfiqle8MNQNPykO4PPlwcXxKh_MaqJN53lGH2ZHhQvJlFTh7fF46wXLHvTG5Mstq6ZzPFUI0z1XlqqrE5Kk00gYY5gpT8UewVze1fwLEpTa1WcZloYwQqbXMioI5lwtXoocpEliO6tNumGA4U-Nax6RGSd2rXKPKdVS5Zgm8292z7qk8_ip9FKxiJxlouOMFNE49GKf-l3Em8DbYlA7OAj_PmaHnAScZaLf0oUT0GDLWNIH9mSRucjcfHq1SD05mo1lY5UKiR07g5W443BkK52rfbFGGFxmmrLLIE3jcG_FuSpxx1FaqEshn5j2b83yk_v4tUpAjouGIfZ_-j0V6BrdY3JmCsmwf9rp2658j0uvsi7ipfwEjWFGe priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagSAgOPJZXoCAj8Tggq4ntOA4X1FYsLVIRQq3Um2U7TkF0kyWb_Qv8bsaOs90Iqde1k401r2-SmW8QesMt-EOnfV2YkIRDiCEmtyVhokorYzjngcD05Js4OuNfz_Pz-MJtFcsqR58YHHXVWv-OfI96GphSgPp9Wv4hfmqU_7oaR2jcRLcyiDS-pEvOv4yemAEY4WOjjBR7K4htkhOfMIXOCEInwShw9v_vmbdC07RscisOzR-gexFA4v1B4g_RDdfM0N0tWsEZun0SP5jP0NttFmF8OlAI4Hf4x4Sge4buf4_yGvc8Qn-PF6GtpHdYNxW-bJsL4v04jiUguK3xweEx8XGwwt3khn4NkCVeL5euw-D_O7cAuI_DRHK86rv2t_uINb7ikcZDD034q4XrNdGRLeUxOpt_Pj08InFqA7GiKHpiIUfSjAuW1V5krqgsp4VlTutC6qzOrHWFBKDmmKxtXVeQQlVaGA_GbKlr9gTtNG3jniFsU5OaPGeilJrz1BhqeEmtLbitwM-UCcpG8SkbD-gna1yqkNpIoQaRKxC5CiJXNEEfNtcsB0KPa3cfeK3Y7PRk3OGHtrtQ0bYVzx2nzhlpheDaagmG4Yoy51pTmnKeoPdep5R3GfB4VsfOBzikJ99S-wIwpM9b0wTtTnaCqdvp8qiVKrqalboyjAS93iz7K335XOPaNexhZQ6JqyiLBD0dlHhzJEYZSCuVCSom6j0583Sl-fUzEJEDrmGAgJ9f_1gv0B0abI4Tmu-inb5bu5eA5HrzKpjrP1uWSEA priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Immediate and long-term effects of BCI-based rehabilitation of the upper extremity after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32334608 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2404396225 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2395260697 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7183617 https://doaj.org/article/45e42eeb8c664aca8ebee7954aa22044 |
| Volume | 17 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1bb9MwFLbGJiF44FJugVEZicsD8khjx3aQEFqnlQ2p0zStUt8sx3EGok1KmkrwB_jdHDtpacSEeMlDfXI5OffG5zsIvWQG_KHVbl8Yl4RBiCFpbBJCeRZmacoY8wCm4zN-MmGfp_F0B63HHbUvcHltaefmSU2q2cGP7z8_gsF_8AYv-bslxCzJiCuEfMcDAZe8B5FJuIkGY7b5qkAhOWFNgyR13dR03URz7TU6gcrj-f_ttbfCVndL5VaMGt1Dd9rkEh822nAf7diih25vQQ720M1x-zG9h15tIwzjywZeAL_GFx3w7h66e97Kck3zAP06nfuWk9piXWR4VhZXxPl43G4PwWWOh0enxMXIDFedC7o1yDrxarGwFYbYUNk5lALYTyvHy7oqv9n3WOM_GNO46a_xt5rbWhPdIqk8RJPR8eXRCWknOhDDhaiJgfpJU8bpIHeoPlZkhkXCUKu1kHqQD4yxQkISZ6nMTZ5nUF5lmqcuUTOJzukjtFuUhX2CsAnTMI1jyhOpGQvTNEpZEhkjmMnAByUBGqzFp0zLoJu6MVO-7JFcNSJXIHLlRa6iAL3dnLNowD7-ST10WrGhdEDd_oeyulKt3SsWWxZZm0rDOdNGSzAaK5KYaR1FIWMBeuN0SjkFh8czuu2KACYdMJc65JBfupo2DNB-hxLcgOkur7VSra1IRe4tJxx8doBebJbdmW5rXWHLFdDQJIailiciQI8bJd6wRCMK0gplgERHvTs8d1eKr188SDnkPBSy46f_zd8zdCvy5sdIFO-j3bpa2eeQ8NVpH90QUwFHOfrUR3vD47Pzi77_86Tv7fs3tvZVvw |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3bbtQwEB2VInF54LLcAgWMROEBWc3ajpMgIdQWll16Eaq2Ut-M4zgF0SbL7laIH-Bz-EbGTrLdCKlvfY0dJ9aMZ84kM2cAXgqD9tBqlxcmEyrQxdAsMinlMg_zLBNCeALTvX05PBSfj6KjFfjb1sK4tMrWJnpDnVfGfSPfYI4GJpWofu8nP6nrGuX-rrYtNGq12LG_f2HINns3-oDyXWds8HG8PaRNVwFqZBzPqUEMr7mQvF-4JW2cG8Fiw63WcaL7Rd8YGycIJCxPClMUOUL8XMvMgQWT6oLjulfgquDoyV1l-uBTa_k5gh_RFuYkcmOGvjQR1AVovhKDso7z8z0C_vcES66wm6a55PcGd-BWA1jJZq1hd2HFlj24uURj2INre80P-h6sL7MWk3FNWUBekYMOIXgPbn9p9KOdcw_-jE59GcvcEl3m5KQqj6nzG6RJOSFVQba2R9T53ZxMOwu6MUSy5GwysVOC_mZqTzG8IL4DOpnNp9UP-5Zocs5bTeqaHf-oUzvXVDfsLPfh8FLk-QBWy6q0j4CYMAuzKOIyTbQQYZaxTKTMmFiYHO1aGkC_FZ8yzQZdJ48T5UOpRKpa5ApFrrzIFQvgzeKeSU0gcuHsLacVi5mO_NtfqKbHqrElSkRWMGuzxEgptNEJHkQbp5HQmrFQiABeO51SzkTh6xndVFrgJh3Zl9qUiFldnBwGsNaZiabFdIdbrVSNaZup84MYwIvFsLvTpeuVtjrDOTyNMFCWaRzAw1qJF1vijKO0wiSAuKPenT13R8rv3zzxOeIojoj78cWv9RyuD8d7u2p3tL_zBG4wf_4EZdEarM6nZ_Yposh59swfXQJfL9tW_AMsToYK |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Immediate+and+long-term+effects+of+BCI-based+rehabilitation+of+the+upper+extremity+after+stroke%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Bai%2C+Zhongfei&rft.au=Fong%2C+Kenneth+N.+K&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Jack+Jiaqi&rft.au=Chan%2C+Josephine&rft.date=2020-04-25&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-020-00686-2&rft.externalDocID=A627371640 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon |