Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 62 - 21
Main Authors Kobsar, Dylan, Charlton, Jesse M., Tse, Calvin T.F., Esculier, Jean-Francois, Graffos, Angelo, Krowchuk, Natasha M., Thatcher, Daniel, Hunt, Michael A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 11.05.2020
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation.
AbstractList Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation.
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation.
Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Methods Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. Results A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. Conclusions The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2–95) being the primary limitation.
Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults.BACKGROUNDInertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults.Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed.METHODSFive electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed.A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research.RESULTSA total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research.The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation.CONCLUSIONSThe findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation.
Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Methods Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. Results A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. Conclusions The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2-95) being the primary limitation. Keywords: Inertial sensors, Inertial measurement units, Gait, Biomechanics, Validity, Reliability, Review
Abstract Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics, other). Although many studies have assessed their validity and reliability, there remains no quantitive summary of this vast body of literature. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the i) concurrent validity and ii) test-retest reliability of IMUs for measuring biomechanical gait outcomes during level walking in healthy adults. Methods Five electronic databases were searched for journal articles assessing the validity or reliability of IMUs during healthy adult walking. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for studies to be included, before two reviewers examined the methodological quality of all included studies. When sufficient data were present for a given biomechanical outcome, data were meta-analyzed on Pearson correlation coefficients (r) or intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for validity and reliability, respectively. Alternatively, qualitative summaries of outcomes were conducted on those that could not be meta-analyzed. Results A total of 82 articles, assessing the validity or reliability of over 100 outcomes, were included in this review. Seventeen biomechanical outcomes, primarily spatiotemporal parameters, were meta-analyzed. The validity and reliability of step and stride times were found to be excellent. Similarly, the validity and reliability of step and stride length, as well as swing and stance time, were found to be good to excellent. Alternatively, spatiotemporal parameter variability and symmetry displayed poor to moderate validity and reliability. IMUs were also found to display moderate reliability for the assessment of local dynamic stability during walking. The remaining biomechanical outcomes were qualitatively summarized to provide a variety of recommendations for future IMU research. Conclusions The findings of this review demonstrate the excellent validity and reliability of IMUs for mean spatiotemporal parameters during walking, but caution the use of spatiotemporal variability and symmetry metrics without strict protocol. Further, this work tentatively supports the use of IMUs for joint angle measurement and other biomechanical outcomes such as stability, regularity, and segmental accelerations. Unfortunately, the strength of these recommendations are limited based on the lack of high-quality studies for each outcome, with underpowered and/or unjustified sample sizes (sample size median 12; range: 2–95) being the primary limitation.
ArticleNumber 62
Audience Academic
Author Krowchuk, Natasha M.
Kobsar, Dylan
Tse, Calvin T.F.
Charlton, Jesse M.
Esculier, Jean-Francois
Graffos, Angelo
Hunt, Michael A.
Thatcher, Daniel
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dylan
  surname: Kobsar
  fullname: Kobsar, Dylan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jesse M.
  surname: Charlton
  fullname: Charlton, Jesse M.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Calvin T.F.
  surname: Tse
  fullname: Tse, Calvin T.F.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jean-Francois
  surname: Esculier
  fullname: Esculier, Jean-Francois
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Angelo
  surname: Graffos
  fullname: Graffos, Angelo
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Natasha M.
  surname: Krowchuk
  fullname: Krowchuk, Natasha M.
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Daniel
  surname: Thatcher
  fullname: Thatcher, Daniel
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Michael A.
  surname: Hunt
  fullname: Hunt, Michael A.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393301$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kktv1DAUhSNURNuBP8ACRWLTTYpfSRwWSFXFo1IlNsDWunauZzw4cbGTVvPv8cyU0qkQ8SL29bmfda7OaXE0hhGL4jUl55TK5l2irJOiIoxUhDSyrviz4oS2gucj4UeP9sfFaUrrvBGkFi-KY854xzmhJ8X8A7zr3bQpYezLiN6Bdn57Dra8Q4igPZZuxDg58GXCMYWYcqFcIfhplfv62U_lHfifbly-L6FMmzThAJMzmXfr8G6HHnCCCkbwm-TSy-K5BZ_w1f1_UXz_9PHb5Zfq-uvnq8uL68o0bTtVQvBaU5St1gZIz4jQNTArubatlYhdx7GTthUUWqEbZnuURqPtWq6ZZcAXxdWe2wdYq5voBogbFcCpXSHEpYJszHhUYGpGobE9o40QVmpD83h7yhAk0U2fWR_2rJtZD9gbHKcI_gB6eDO6lVqGW9VmYkOaDDi7B8Twa8Y0qcElg97DiGFOiglCJW15drUo3j6RrsMc8_B2KsG7umP0r2oJ2YAbbcjvmi1UXTSsFfmTMqvO_6HKq8fBmZwo63L9oOHNY6MPDv-EJgvYXmBiSCmifZBQorbJVPtkqpxMtUum4rlJPmkybsohCdthOf-_1t_N0Oih
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_023_04255_9
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0274817
crossref_primary_10_1002_jor_25421
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_67675_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_jfmk10010082
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20164385
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2024_04_002
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23042342
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13102_023_00792_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2021_02_011
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20174866
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2025_1507162
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22031196
crossref_primary_10_1177_17543371221110424
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23135933
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMRB_2023_3310196
crossref_primary_10_15857_ksep_2024_00346
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22010376
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22239301
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2023_3268669
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20247143
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13036_023_00398_w
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm12134383
crossref_primary_10_1017_wtc_2024_6
crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2024_2427113
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23239599
crossref_primary_10_1186_s11556_021_00271_z
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_1005496
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm14061944
crossref_primary_10_3390_s20226453
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3370301
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_105957
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2023_111598
crossref_primary_10_1080_24748668_2023_2194604
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00402_024_05503_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2023_106009
crossref_primary_10_3389_fresc_2023_1189376
crossref_primary_10_1080_24735132_2023_2221993
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph19148375
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2024_3459964
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21113748
crossref_primary_10_1080_00222895_2022_2146043
crossref_primary_10_1097_ALN_0000000000005180
crossref_primary_10_3390_geriatrics8050098
crossref_primary_10_1186_s42836_023_00204_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23010331
crossref_primary_10_3390_informatics9040097
crossref_primary_10_3390_technologies10030072
crossref_primary_10_2196_65342
crossref_primary_10_2196_57601
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2022_976594
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20043631
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_18845_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21185990
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00167_021_06501_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23031547
crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics13071363
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_32550_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_knee_2023_04_006
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24113378
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2023_3336790
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22218387
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23208615
crossref_primary_10_4081_ejtm_2023_11607
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_021_23207_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21134535
crossref_primary_10_1519_SSC_0000000000000901
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13104_022_06196_9
crossref_primary_10_3390_app13116483
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_88794_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24237825
crossref_primary_10_1093_ptj_pzad184
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20043107
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24237427
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22031050
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22031171
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_078X_24_49154_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24165213
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medengphy_2024_104146
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01375_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22218272
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3410402
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbot_2021_723206
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00132_023_04404_3
crossref_primary_10_38025_2078_1962_2024_23_4_38_46
crossref_primary_10_3390_jsan11010019
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2023_111899
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2023_111818
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22155657
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21217217
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2784_8469_21_04125_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_joca_2020_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2023_11_002
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24092691
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_024_01469_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2022_111263
crossref_primary_10_3233_BME_240031
crossref_primary_10_1080_10255842_2020_1864822
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41393_020_00559_4
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22030863
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24072163
crossref_primary_10_3390_s25061764
crossref_primary_10_3390_electronics13234739
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22176620
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_35_796
crossref_primary_10_23736_S2784_8469_21_04137_7
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1293_2965_24_48990_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_17543371241272789
crossref_primary_10_1109_OJEMB_2024_3408078
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24134172
crossref_primary_10_1002_acr_25096
crossref_primary_10_3390_app15031297
crossref_primary_10_7717_peerj_14054
crossref_primary_10_1109_TMRB_2023_3329585
crossref_primary_10_1109_TNSRE_2023_3250612
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_autcon_2024_105356
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21227497
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2024_112225
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24217059
crossref_primary_10_1177_09544119211072971
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23135863
crossref_primary_10_1002_mds_28343
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2025_3526676
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14166907
crossref_primary_10_1177_20556683231182322
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_65662_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12877_024_05475_3
crossref_primary_10_3390_jfmk9040266
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinbiomech_2022_105658
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_ad9838
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2022_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2024_04_029
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2024_3436532
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40798_022_00477_0
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21144808
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2024_10_013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2024_109338
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10235645
crossref_primary_10_1109_JSEN_2023_3294306
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4173272
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2024_08_007
crossref_primary_10_3390_s25020315
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12311_023_01625_2
crossref_primary_10_2196_63928
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2021_01_013
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22239322
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22083050
crossref_primary_10_1227_neu_0000000000002519
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pntd_0012537
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2024_1372757
crossref_primary_10_3390_s21238089
crossref_primary_10_3390_s22103842
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare9111444
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2024_06_007
crossref_primary_10_1109_JTEHM_2022_3226153
crossref_primary_10_1080_17434440_2021_1988849
crossref_primary_10_1097_PHM_0000000000002329
crossref_primary_10_3758_s13428_024_02493_2
crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13152593
crossref_primary_10_3390_app14156537
crossref_primary_10_3390_app15010461
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gaitpost_2022_01_024
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2022_111278
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24175736
crossref_primary_10_3390_s24196417
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.001
10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00233-1
10.1186/s12938-015-0103-8
10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90231-3
10.1177/1545968306287171
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.009
10.3390/s140406891
10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00231-7
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.012
10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
10.2196/mhealth.8815
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.003
10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.010
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.008
10.1016/0021-9290(92)90036-Z
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.003
10.3390/s19071555
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.019
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.020
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.009
10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843176
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.049
10.4236/health.2015.76084
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.010
10.1123/jab.28.3.349
10.3390/s19030596
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.005
10.3390/s18030719
10.1186/1743-0003-9-9
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.027
10.1080/17461391.2014.955131
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.021
10.1299/jsmec.44.1125
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.014
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.003
10.1088/0967-3334/34/8/N63
10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/N29
10.1007/s10439-010-0018-2
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.07.012
10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.02.003
10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00093-6
10.3390/s19010038
10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X
10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.189
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.003
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.012
10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.021
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.032
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.01.014
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.011
10.1186/1743-0003-3-4
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.008
10.3390/s18071980
10.1007/s11517-010-0692-0
10.1093/ageing/afp159
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.05.014
10.1109/TBME.2016.2523512
10.1109/JBHI.2015.2419317
10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2282080
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.004
10.1186/s12938-018-0488-2
10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.031
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.030
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
10.1109/JBHI.2016.2608720
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.011
10.1109/TBME.2014.2299772
10.1371/journal.pone.0098395
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.012
10.1093/bja/aew320
10.1515/bmt-2016-0067
10.3390/s17071522
10.1191/0962280204sm365ra
10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.09.007
10.1186/1743-0003-11-152
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.007
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.020
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.021
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.028
10.3390/s101211556
10.1111/j.1475-097X.2009.00864.x
10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00069-9
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.012
10.1109/TBME.2012.2216263
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010
10.1055/s-2007-965336
10.3390/s120202255
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.01.003
10.1007/s12283-012-0093-8
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.008
10.1089/tmj.2011.0132
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.025
10.1016/j.jbi.2016.07.009
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.016
10.1109/JSEN.2016.2616227
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.008
10.3390/s18082638
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.019
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2020
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2020
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7QO
7RV
7TB
7TK
7TS
7X7
7XB
88C
88E
8FD
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABJCF
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BGLVJ
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
L6V
LK8
M0S
M0T
M1P
M7P
M7S
NAPCQ
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PTHSS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12984-020-00685-3
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
Neurosciences Abstracts
Physical Education Index
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Technology Collection
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
Medical Database
Biological Science Database
Engineering Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Engineering Collection
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Engineering Collection
Engineering Database
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
ProQuest Technology Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Physical Education Index
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Engineering Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Materials Science & Engineering Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
PubMed
Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE - Academic


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: 8FG
  name: ProQuest Technology Collection
  url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Engineering
Occupational Therapy & Rehabilitation
Physical Therapy
EISSN 1743-0003
EndPage 21
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ac521a6fd21644f8bc1129d12ea80b6d
PMC7216606
A627444488
32393301
10_1186_s12984_020_00685_3
Genre Journal Article
Review
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29L
2QV
2WC
53G
5GY
5VS
7RV
7X7
88E
8FE
8FG
8FH
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABJCF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIWK
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
AQUVI
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BGLVJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPY
ITC
KQ8
L6V
LK8
M0T
M1P
M48
M7P
M7S
ML0
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PTHSS
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
NPM
PMFND
7QO
7TB
7TK
7TS
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
K9.
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c677t-4435b1e87bbca0d204b5a2f83bf7f8ee993e98f741a74b62fde8cbef973b2f2a3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1743-0003
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:27 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:02:20 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 04:40:17 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:02:21 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:29:47 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:49:48 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:58:14 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:19:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:58:57 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Biomechanics
Validity
Inertial sensors
Gait
Inertial measurement units
Review
Reliability
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c677t-4435b1e87bbca0d204b5a2f83bf7f8ee993e98f741a74b62fde8cbef973b2f2a3
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12984-020-00685-3
PMID 32393301
PQID 2404395921
PQPubID 55356
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ac521a6fd21644f8bc1129d12ea80b6d
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7216606
proquest_miscellaneous_2401817399
proquest_journals_2404395921
gale_infotracmisc_A627444488
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A627444488
pubmed_primary_32393301
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12984_020_00685_3
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12984_020_00685_3
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2020-05-11
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2020-05-11
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2020
  text: 2020-05-11
  day: 11
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
PublicationTitleAlternate J Neuroeng Rehabil
PublicationYear 2020
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References T Schmitz-Hübsch (685_CR81) 2016; 48
W Teufl (685_CR89) 2019; 19
E Allseits (685_CR23) 2017; 55
D McGrath (685_CR72) 2012; 15
F Reynard (685_CR78) 2014; 47
R Moe-Nilssen (685_CR111) 2010; 32
F Kluge (685_CR60) 2017; 17
A Hartmann (685_CR51) 2009; 29
K Ben Mansour (685_CR28) 2015; 42
A Hartmann (685_CR52) 2009; 30
I Poitras (685_CR13) 2019; 19
M Furrer (685_CR43) 2015; 42
E Chalmers (685_CR35) 2014; 39
MM Shoukri (685_CR107) 2004; 13
MR Backhouse (685_CR26) 2013; 28
K Liu (685_CR65) 2009; 42
D Trojaniello (685_CR91) 2014; 40
W Zijlstra (685_CR101) 2003; 18
BR Greene (685_CR47) 2012; 28
JJ Kavanagh (685_CR58) 2006; 39
H Cooper (685_CR17) 2009
S Chen (685_CR10) 2016; 20
Y Ohtako (685_CR75) 2001; 44
I Bautmans (685_CR27) 2011; 33
P Silsupadol (685_CR86) 2017; 58
DT-P Fong (685_CR9) 2010; 10
T Liikavainio (685_CR64) 2007; 88
KS van Schooten (685_CR95) 2013; 46
M L’Hermette (685_CR63) 2008; 29
A Abu-Arafeh (685_CR110) 2016; 117
SR Hundza (685_CR55) 2014; 22
D Trojaniello (685_CR93) 2015; 42
N Abhayasinghe (685_CR20) 2019; 19
JM Bland (685_CR109) 1990; 20
JM Charlton (685_CR37) 2019; 89
B Sijobert (685_CR85) 2015; 07
R Moe-Nilssen (685_CR73) 1998; 79
685_CR25
KL Paterson (685_CR104) 2009; 38
R Fisher (685_CR18) 1954
SR Simon (685_CR3) 2004; 37
R Senden (685_CR84) 2009; 30
T Seel (685_CR6) 2014; 14
JS Brach (685_CR105) 2008; 89
Y Huang (685_CR54) 2016; 63
N Kitagawa (685_CR59) 2016; 45
A Karatsidis (685_CR57) 2019; 65
M Benoussaad (685_CR29) 2016; 16
R Caldas (685_CR11) 2017; 57
H Xia (685_CR98) 2017; 61
B Mariani (685_CR70) 2012; 59
685_CR94
RM Chapman (685_CR36) 2019; 84
E Sejdic (685_CR82) 2015; 4
S Del Din (685_CR41) 2016; 20
K Lebel (685_CR62) 2017; 16
D Jarchi (685_CR56) 2014; 61
685_CR90
W Tao (685_CR4) 2012; 12
M Henriksen (685_CR53) 2004; 19
A Kose (685_CR61) 2012; 9
RE Mayagoitia (685_CR7) 2002; 35
685_CR99
B Manor (685_CR69) 2018; 6
B Mariani (685_CR71) 2013; 37
DWT Wundersitz (685_CR97) 2015; 15
RW Selles (685_CR83) 2005; 13
D Hamacher (685_CR49) 2014; 39
M Law (685_CR14) 2008
D Steins (685_CR87) 2014; 47
RC Wagenaar (685_CR2) 1992; 25
R Moe-Nilssen (685_CR106) 2004; 37
K Aminian (685_CR24) 2004; 20
G Cooper (685_CR39) 2009; 42
L Pepa (685_CR77) 2017; 57
F Bugané (685_CR33) 2012; 108
K Saremi (685_CR80) 2006; 20
M Iosa (685_CR8) 2016; 4440
M van Tulder (685_CR15) 2003; 28
SM Bruijn (685_CR32) 2010; 38
S Lord (685_CR102) 2011; 34
FA Storm (685_CR88) 2016; 50
A Godfrey (685_CR44) 2015; 37
E Allseits (685_CR22) 2018; 66
T Lyytinen (685_CR67) 2016; 16
M Bertoli (685_CR30) 2018; 17
S Nishiguchi (685_CR74) 2012; 18
J Higgins (685_CR19) 2003; 327
G Schwarzer (685_CR16) 2007; 7
B Galna (685_CR103) 2013; 37
NA Maffiuletti (685_CR68) 2008; 27
AM Sabatini (685_CR79) 2015; 14
ML Gorelick (685_CR46) 2009; 29
P Esser (685_CR42) 2009; 42
R van der Straaten (685_CR12) 2018; 59
A Dalton (685_CR40) 2013; 37
EP Washabaugh (685_CR96) 2017; 55
S Lord (685_CR66) 2008; 27
D Hamacher (685_CR50) 2015; 37
S Byun (685_CR34) 2016; 11
I González (685_CR45) 2016; 62
BR Greene (685_CR48) 2010; 48
D Trojaniello (685_CR92) 2014; 11
K Orlowski (685_CR76) 2017; 62
MH Cole (685_CR38) 2014; 9
J Kottner (685_CR108) 2011; 64
R Baker (685_CR1) 2006; 3
SAAN Bolink (685_CR31) 2016; 38
PB Shull (685_CR5) 2014; 40
A Zijlstra (685_CR100) 2013; 38
M Al-Amri (685_CR21) 2018; 18
References_xml – volume-title: Statistical methods for the research worker. 12th editi
  year: 1954
  ident: 685_CR18
– volume: 27
  start-page: 357
  year: 2008
  ident: 685_CR66
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.04.001
– volume: 37
  start-page: 121
  year: 2004
  ident: 685_CR106
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00233-1
– volume: 14
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR79
  publication-title: Biomed Eng Online
  doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0103-8
– volume: 79
  start-page: 1377
  year: 1998
  ident: 685_CR73
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(98)90231-3
– volume: 20
  start-page: 297
  year: 2006
  ident: 685_CR80
  publication-title: Neurorehabil Neural Repair
  doi: 10.1177/1545968306287171
– volume: 28
  start-page: 473
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR26
  publication-title: Clin Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.02.009
– volume: 14
  start-page: 6891
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR6
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s140406891
– volume: 35
  start-page: 537
  year: 2002
  ident: 685_CR7
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00231-7
– volume: 39
  start-page: 2863
  year: 2006
  ident: 685_CR58
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.09.012
– volume: 327
  start-page: 557
  year: 2003
  ident: 685_CR19
  publication-title: BMJ.
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
– volume: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 685_CR69
  publication-title: JMIR mHealth uHealth
  doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8815
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1869
  year: 2004
  ident: 685_CR3
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.047
– volume: 33
  start-page: 366
  year: 2011
  ident: 685_CR27
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.003
– volume: 89
  start-page: 2293
  issue: 12
  year: 2008
  ident: 685_CR105
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.010
– volume: 30
  start-page: 192
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR84
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.04.008
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1007
  year: 1992
  ident: 685_CR2
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(92)90036-Z
– volume: 42
  start-page: 289
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR43
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.003
– volume: 19
  start-page: 1555
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR13
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s19071555
– volume: 57
  start-page: 204
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR11
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.019
– volume: 42
  start-page: 409
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR28
  publication-title: Gait Posture
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.05.020
– volume: 38
  start-page: 225
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR31
  publication-title: Med Eng Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.11.009
– volume: 13
  start-page: 81
  year: 2005
  ident: 685_CR83
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng.
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2004.843176
– volume: 42
  start-page: 1578
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR42
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.049
– volume: 4440
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR8
  publication-title: Expert Rev Med Devices
– volume: 07
  start-page: 704
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR85
  publication-title: Health.
  doi: 10.4236/health.2015.76084
– volume: 66
  start-page: 137
  year: 2018
  ident: 685_CR22
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.11.010
– volume: 28
  start-page: 349
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR47
  publication-title: J Appl Biomech
  doi: 10.1123/jab.28.3.349
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR34
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 19
  start-page: 596
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR20
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s19030596
– volume: 55
  start-page: 87
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR96
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013
– volume: 59
  start-page: 229
  year: 2018
  ident: 685_CR12
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.005
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 685_CR21
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s18030719
– volume: 9
  start-page: 9
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR61
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil
  doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-9-9
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR82
  publication-title: IEEE J Transl Eng Heal Med
– volume: 84
  start-page: 129
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR36
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.12.027
– volume-title: The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. 2nd editio
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR17
– volume: 15
  start-page: 382
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR97
  publication-title: Eur J Sport Sci
  doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.955131
– volume: 38
  start-page: 940
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR100
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.04.021
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1125
  year: 2001
  ident: 685_CR75
  publication-title: JSME Int J Ser C
  doi: 10.1299/jsmec.44.1125
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1290
  year: 2003
  ident: 685_CR15
  publication-title: Spine.
– volume: 47
  start-page: 3780
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR87
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.06.014
– volume: 37
  start-page: 400
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR44
  publication-title: Med Eng Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.02.003
– ident: 685_CR99
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/34/8/N63
– ident: 685_CR25
  doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/35/5/N29
– volume: 38
  start-page: 2588
  year: 2010
  ident: 685_CR32
  publication-title: Ann Biomed Eng
  doi: 10.1007/s10439-010-0018-2
– volume: 61
  start-page: 193
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR98
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.07.012
– volume: 108
  start-page: 129
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR33
  publication-title: Comput Methods Prog Biomed
  doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.02.003
– volume: 20
  start-page: 102
  year: 2004
  ident: 685_CR24
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00093-6
– volume: 19
  start-page: 38
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR89
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s19010038
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  ident: 685_CR101
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X
– volume: 20
  start-page: 337
  year: 1990
  ident: 685_CR109
  publication-title: Comput Biol Med
  doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-F
– volume: 7
  start-page: 40
  year: 2007
  ident: 685_CR16
  publication-title: R News
– volume: 40
  start-page: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR5
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.03.189
– volume: 29
  start-page: 444
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR51
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.003
– volume: 37
  start-page: 229
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR71
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.012
– volume: 65
  start-page: 68
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR57
  publication-title: Med Eng Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2018.12.021
– volume: 46
  start-page: 137
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR95
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.10.032
– volume: 45
  start-page: 110
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR59
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.01.014
– volume: 57
  start-page: 217
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR77
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.06.011
– volume: 3
  start-page: 1
  year: 2006
  ident: 685_CR1
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil.
  doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-3-4
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2747
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR65
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.008
– ident: 685_CR90
  doi: 10.3390/s18071980
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1251
  year: 2010
  ident: 685_CR48
  publication-title: Med Biol Eng Comput
  doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0692-0
– volume: 38
  start-page: 745
  issue: 6
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR104
  publication-title: Age Ageing
  doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp159
– volume: 48
  start-page: 194
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR81
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.05.014
– volume: 63
  start-page: 2278
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR54
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2523512
– volume: 20
  start-page: 838
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR41
  publication-title: IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics.
  doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2419317
– volume: 22
  start-page: 127
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR55
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2282080
– volume: 42
  start-page: 2678
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR39
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.08.004
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 685_CR30
  publication-title: Biomed Eng Online
  doi: 10.1186/s12938-018-0488-2
– volume: 88
  start-page: 907
  year: 2007
  ident: 685_CR64
  publication-title: Arch Phys Med Rehabil
  doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.031
– volume: 58
  start-page: 516
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR86
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.09.030
– volume: 64
  start-page: 96
  year: 2011
  ident: 685_CR108
  publication-title: J Clin Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
– volume: 20
  start-page: 1521
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR10
  publication-title: IEEE J Biomed Heal Informatics
  doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2608720
– volume: 47
  start-page: 74
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR78
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.011
– volume: 61
  start-page: 1261
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR56
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2299772
– volume: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR38
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098395
– volume: 50
  start-page: 42
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR88
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.08.012
– volume: 117
  start-page: 569
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR110
  publication-title: Br J Anaesth
  doi: 10.1093/bja/aew320
– volume: 62
  start-page: 615
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR76
  publication-title: Biomed Eng / Biomed Tech
  doi: 10.1515/bmt-2016-0067
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1522
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR60
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s17071522
– volume: 13
  start-page: 251
  year: 2004
  ident: 685_CR107
  publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res
  doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm365ra
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1152
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR50
  publication-title: Med Eng Phys
  doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.09.007
– volume: 11
  start-page: 152
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR92
  publication-title: J Neuroeng Rehabil.
  doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-152
– volume: 40
  start-page: 487
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR91
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.007
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1146
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR49
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.020
– volume: 39
  start-page: 485
  year: 2014
  ident: 685_CR35
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.08.021
– volume: 37
  start-page: 49
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR40
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.05.028
– volume: 10
  start-page: 11556
  year: 2010
  ident: 685_CR9
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s101211556
– volume: 29
  start-page: 271
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR46
  publication-title: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging
  doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2009.00864.x
– volume: 19
  start-page: 288
  year: 2004
  ident: 685_CR53
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00069-9
– volume: 89
  start-page: 123
  year: 2019
  ident: 685_CR37
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.012
– volume: 59
  start-page: 3162
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR70
  publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2012.2216263
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR62
  publication-title: BioMed Central
– volume: 34
  start-page: 443
  year: 2011
  ident: 685_CR102
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.010
– volume: 29
  start-page: 322
  year: 2008
  ident: 685_CR63
  publication-title: Int J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965336
– volume: 12
  start-page: 2255
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR4
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.3390/s120202255
– volume-title: Evidence-based rehabilitation: a guide to practice
  year: 2008
  ident: 685_CR14
– volume: 27
  start-page: 160
  year: 2008
  ident: 685_CR68
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.01.003
– volume: 15
  start-page: 207
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR72
  publication-title: Sport Eng
  doi: 10.1007/s12283-012-0093-8
– volume: 30
  start-page: 351
  year: 2009
  ident: 685_CR52
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.06.008
– volume: 16
  start-page: 63
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR67
  publication-title: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact
– volume: 18
  start-page: 292
  year: 2012
  ident: 685_CR74
  publication-title: Telemed e-Health
  doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0132
– volume: 37
  start-page: 580
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 685_CR103
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.09.025
– volume: 62
  start-page: 210
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR45
  publication-title: J Biomed Inform
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2016.07.009
– volume: 55
  start-page: 27
  year: 2017
  ident: 685_CR23
  publication-title: J Biomech
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.016
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 685_CR29
  publication-title: Sensors.
  doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2016.2616227
– volume: 42
  start-page: 310
  year: 2015
  ident: 685_CR93
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.06.008
– ident: 685_CR94
  doi: 10.3390/s18082638
– volume: 32
  start-page: 98
  year: 2010
  ident: 685_CR111
  publication-title: Gait Posture.
  doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.03.019
SSID ssj0034054
Score 2.5998633
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal, kinematics,...
Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g., spatiotemporal,...
Abstract Background Inertial measurement units (IMUs) offer the ability to measure walking gait through a variety of biomechanical outcomes (e.g.,...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 62
SubjectTerms Adults
Analysis
Biomechanics
Correlation analysis
Correlation coefficients
Dynamic stability
Gait
Inertial measurement units
Inertial platforms
Inertial sensing devices
Inertial sensors
Kinematics
Measuring instruments
Meta-analysis
Parameters
Qualitative analysis
Quality
Quantitative psychology
Reliability
Reliability analysis
Review
Reviews
Sensors
Stability analysis
Symmetry
Systematic review
Validity
Walking
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yB9GDq8-vrqtE8OMgYV-TtE29reKyCCsiu7K3MEkTXHj2yftg8b93pmmfLYJe7LGZKU1mMvlNm_mFsRdO5l6CrMUcVCF0AUE48F6UDWbatcYFo6E_umefytML_fGyuBwd9UV7whI9cBq4I_AoD2VsJAJ7HY3zhBCaXAYwc1c2FH1xzRuSqRSDFcIQPZTImPJojSpGC0qVqCaiEGqyDHVs_X_G5NGiNN0wOVqBTu6yOz105Mfple-xG6GdsdsjQsEZu3nW_yqfsZdj_mB-nsgD-Cv-ZULNPWP7n3tLDTL32fYrgvMG4TmHtuGrsLhKGj_5MvJrnBpUbsWpahDDw4KvMRNertZ4g6eqStQjVg9-DQv6EP-WA_9NGM1TsUz36O9hAwJ6WpQH7OLkw_n7U9EfzyB8WVUboRFpuTyYyjkPc7StdgXIaJSLVTQhIPIJtYkIWaDSrpSxCca7EOtKORklqIdsr1224THjoSy1CSgBzuvKK6OhoPNUgyqUA6kylg_Wsr4fIDpCY2G7HMaUNlnYooVtZ2GLOm92Oj8Sc8dfpd-RE-wkiXW7u4G-aHtftP_yxYy9JheyFBvw9Tz0JQ7YSWLZssd00BFexmTscCKJc9pPmwcntH1MWVtJREh1Ucs8Y893zaRJ--TasNx2MgjZKkSdGXuUfHbXJUVsdxjPM1ZNvHnS52lLe_WtYxwnhifMdA_-xyA9YbdkNxELkeeHbG-z2oanCOw27lk3h38BhkVM3Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection
  dbid: 8FG
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEB_0BNEHP1ZPq6dE8ONBwm2TtE19kVNcD-FE5E7uLSRpqgdre-4Hh_-9M226t0W4fWwmS9P5TjK_AXjpROqFFSWfWplxldnAnfWe5xVm2qVCh1HRie7R1_zwRH05zU7jhtsyXqscbGJnqKvW0x75viAYmDIrRfr-_A-nrlF0uhpbaFyHGyl6GrrSpWefB0ssMRhRQ6GMzveX6Nu04pQwUWVExuXIGXWY_f9b5i3XNL42ueWHZvfgTgwg2UHP8ftwLTQTuL0FKziBm0fxwHwCr7ZRhNlxDyHAXrPvI4DuCdz9Fvk10DyA9Q8M0SsM0pltKrYI87N-xl_W1uwCFYSKrhjVDqKRmLMl5sPtYokPWF9bifMI24Nd2Dltx79jll3CRrO-ZKb7699hZbmN4CgP4WT26fjjIY9NGrjPi2LFFcZbLg26cM7bKXJYucyKWktXF7UOAeOfUOoaAxdbKJeLugrau1CXhXSiFlbuwk7TNuExsJDnSgeksM6rwkutbEZdVYPMpLNCJpAO3DI-fiBqpDE3XSajc9Nz2CCHTcdhg3Pebuac9_gdV1J_ICHYUBL2dvegXfw0UZWN9SjBNq8rgammqrXzFLNWqQhWT11eJfCGRMiQhcDX8zYWOuAiCWvLHFC7I_xpncDeiBI124-HByE00bIszaUeJPBiM0wz6bZcE9p1R4OBW4GxZwKPepndLEkS5h1a9QSKkTSP1jweac5-dbjjhPOE-e6Tq1_rKdwSnYplPE33YGe1WIdnGLit3PNOO_8BNf5EBQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32393301
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2404395921
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2401817399
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7216606
https://doaj.org/article/ac521a6fd21644f8bc1129d12ea80b6d
Volume 17
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3rb9MwED_tIU3jA4_yCozKSDw-oIzGdmIHCaEOrUyVOk1jRf1m2Y4Dk0oKfWjsv-ecR2nEoB9aKT5Hde4u97s49zuAF4ZGlmqahj3N4pDH2oVGWxsmGWbaKceAkfkd3dFpcjLmw0k82YKm3VF9ARc3pna-n9R4Pj389fP6Azr8-9LhZfJ2gTFL8tAnQr7iIQ7ZNuxiZBK-o8GIr3cVGIIT3hTO3DhvH_aY5wRjdY-YJk6VdP5_37Q3olb7jcqNEDW4C7drbEn6lTHcgy1XdODWBuNgB_ZG9V56B15uEgyTi4pdgLwi5y3u7g7cOatV2cjch9UXRO8Z4neii4zM3fSymnFNZjm5Qt_x9VjElxXi_WNKFpgqz-YLPECqskuc52k_yJWe-if174gmfxilSVVNU576u1vqUNe8KQ9gPDi--HgS1v0bQpsIsQw5QjETOSmMsbqHyucm1jSXzOQil84hNHKpzBHTaMFNQvPMSWtcngpmaE41ewg7xaxwj4G4JOHSoYQ2lgvLJNexb7jqWMyMpiyAqNGWsvUF8j02pqpMcmSiKmUrVLYqla1wzpv1nB8Vtcd_pY-8EawlPS13eWA2_6pqL1faonHrJM8oZqE8l8Z6OJtF1GnZM0kWwGtvQsqbM_49q-saCFykp-FSfd8JCT9SBnDQkkSnt-3hxghV4zOKeqakNE5pFMDz9bCf6V-kK9xsVcogphMISwN4VNnsekmN6QcgWtbcWnN7pLj8VlKSewooTIWf_POcT2Gflo4Wh1F0ADvL-co9Qzi3NF3YFhOB33LwqQu7_f7w8xB_j45Pz8675SOSbunFvwGvGEzk
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Zb9QwELZKkTgeOJYrUMBIFB6Q1Y3tJA4SQuVYtvQQqraob8Z2HKi0JGUPrfqn-I3M5NhuhNS35jEeR3ZmPIft-YaQl5aHjhuesr4REZOR8cwa51icQaSdSjAYGZ7o7h_EwyP59Tg6XiN_21wYvFbZ6sRKUWelwz3yLY4wMGmU8vD96R-GVaPwdLUtoVGLxa4_W0DINn238wn4u8n54PPo45A1VQWYi5NkxiQ4CDb0KrHWmT4MSdrI8FwJmye58h4Mtk9VDpbWJNLGPM-8ctbnaSIsz7kR8N0r5KoUYMkxM33wpdX8Apwf2SbmqHhrCrZUSYYBGmZiREx0jF9VI-B_S7BiCrvXNFfs3uAOudU4rHS7lrC7ZM0XPXJzBcawR67tNwf0PbK5ilpMRzVkAX1FDzuA4D1y-1sjHy3NPTL_DiFBBkEBNUVGJ358Uvc4o2VOF_DnMcmLYq4iKKUxnUL8XU6m8ILWuZzQD7FE6MKMcfv_LTX0HKaa1ik61ad_-5lhpgFjuU-OLoV9D8h6URb-EaE-jqXyQGGsk4kTSpoIq7h6EQlruAhI2HJLu-YHYeGOsa4iJxXrmsMaOKwrDmvo82bZ57TGC7mQ-gMKwZISsb6rF-Xkp25UhzYOVoyJ84xDaCtzZR36yFnIvVF9G2cBeY0ipFEjwfCcaRIrYJKI7aW3sbwSPEoFZKNDCZrEdZtbIdSNJpvq83UXkBfLZuyJt_MKX84rGnAUE_B1A_KwltnllARi7IEVCUjSkebOnLstxcmvCucccaUgvn588bCek-vD0f6e3ts52H1CbvBquUUsDDfI-mwy90_BaZzZZ9VKpeTHZauGf2JwgsE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity+and+reliability+of+wearable+inertial+sensors+in+healthy+adult+walking%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neuroengineering+and+rehabilitation&rft.au=Kobsar%2C+Dylan&rft.au=Charlton%2C+Jesse+M&rft.au=Tse%2C+Calvin+T+F&rft.au=Esculier%2C+Jean-Francois&rft.date=2020-05-11&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=62&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12984-020-00685-3&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F32393301&rft.externalDocID=32393301
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-0003&client=summon