Segregation distortion and linkage analysis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)

An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F 2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenome Vol. 53; no. 10; pp. 805 - 815
Main Authors Barchi, Lorenzo, Lanteri, Sergio, Portis, Ezio, Stàgel, Anikò, Valè, Giampiero, Toppino, Laura, Rotino, Giuseppe Leonardo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Canada NRC Research Press 01.10.2010
Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
Subjects
aubergine
Chromosome Mapping
Chromosome Segregation - genetics
Chromosomes, Plant - genetics
Crosses, Genetic
Eggplant
Fusarium
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae
Genetic aspects
Genetic diversity
Genetic Linkage
Genetic Markers - physiology
Genetic variation
Genomics
Genotype
Genotype & phenotype
Lycopersicon esculentum
marqueurs moléculaires
molecular markers
Molecular structure
Plant breeding
Polymorphism
Quantitative Trait Loci
Sequence Alignment
Solanum
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena - genetics
Tomatoes
Vegetables
Italy
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F 2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum ;; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F 2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F 2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F 2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
AbstractList An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an [F.sub.2] mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporwn; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 [F.sub.2] individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the [F.sub.2] population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 [F.sub.2] individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs. 4 tomato RFLPs. and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP. and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F 2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum ; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F 2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F 2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F 2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F sub(2) mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F sub(2) individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F sub(2) population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F sub(2) individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.Original Abstract: Une population d'haploiedes doubles (HD), obtenue par culture d'antheres, et une population F sub(2) ont ete developpees a partir d'un croisement intraspecifique entre deux lignees de selectionneur (305E40 et 67/3) chez l'aubergine. La premiere contient un segment introgresse en provenance du Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group, lequel comprend le gene Rfo-sa1 qui confere la resistance au Fusarium oxysporum. La seconde lignee est une selection retenue au sein d'un croisement intraspecifique entre deux cultivars conventionnels d'aubergine qui etaient depourvus du gene Rfo-sa1. Initialement, 28 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP ont ete employees sur 93 individus F sub(2) et 93 HD pour identifier 170 amplicons AFLP polymorphes. Au sein de la population HD, la segregation de 117 de ces AFLP ainsi que tous les marqueurs fortement lies au gene Rfo-sa1 etait significativement biaisee. Par contre, au sein de la population F sub(2), le biais etait limite a seulement 10 marqueurs ; cette derniere population a donc ete retenue pour le developpement d'une carte. Une collection de 142 individus F sub(2) a ete examinee avec 73 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP (generant 406 marqueurs), 32 SSR, quatre RFLP de tomate et trois marqueurs CAPS lies au gene Rfo-sa1. Cela a permis d'assigner 348 marqueurs a l'un de 12 groupes de liaison majeurs. La carte cadre s'etend sur 718,7 cM, compte 238 marqueurs (212 AFLP, 22 SSR, un RFLP et les marqueurs CAPS lies a Rfo-sa1). L'ordre des marqueurs et les distances qui les separent dans cette carte de l'aubergine etaient largement conformes a ce qui a ete rapporte recemment pour une carte fondee sur des SSR. Dans une perspective d'amelioration genetique, les populations HD produites par culture d'antheres semblent sujettes a des biais de segregation massifs et ainsi ne seraient pas tres efficaces pour capture la gamme complete de variation genetique presente chez les lignees parentales.
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an [F.sub.2] mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporwn; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 [F.sub.2] individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the [F.sub.2] population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 [F.sub.2] individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs. 4 tomato RFLPs. and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP. and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines. Key words: eggplant, [F.sub.2], molecular markers, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae. Une population d'haploides doubles (HD), obtenue par culture d'antheres, el une population [F.sub.2] ont ete developpees a partir d'un croisement iniraspecifique entre deux lignees de selectionneur (305E40 et 67/3) chez. l'aubergine. La premiere contient un segment introgresse en provenance du Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group, lequel comprend le gene Rfo-sa1 qui confere la resistance au Fusarium oxysporum. La seconde lignee est une selection retenue au sein d'un croisement intraspecifique entre deux cultivars conventionnels d'aubergine qui etaient depourvus du gene Rfo-sa1. Initialement. 28 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP ont ete employees sur 93 individus [F.sub.2] et 93 HD pour identifier 170 amplicons AFLP polymorphes. Au sein de la population HD, la segregation de 117 de ces AFLP ainsi que tous les marqueurs fortement lies au gene Rfo-sa1 etait significativement biaisee. Par contre, au sein de la population [F.sub.2], le biais etait limite a seulement 10 marqueurs ; cette derniere population a done ete retenue pour le developpement d'une carte. Une collection de 142 individus [F.sub.2] a ete examinee avec 73 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP (generant 406 marqueurs), 32 SSR, quatre RFLP de tomate et trois marqueurs CAPS lies au gene Rfo-sa1. Cela a permis d'assigner 348 marqueurs a l'un de 12 groupes de liaison majeure. La carte cadre s'etend sur 718,7 cM, compte 238 marqueurs (212 AFLP, 22 SSR, un RFLP el les marqueurs CAPS lies a Rfo-sa1). L'ordre des marqueurs et les distances qui les separent dans cette carte de l'aubergine etaient largement conformes a ce qui a ete rapporte recemment pour une carte fondee sur des SSR. Dans une perspective d'amelioration genetique, les populations HD produites par culture d'antheres semblent sujettes a des biais de segregation massifs et ainsi ne seraient pas tres efficaces pour capture la gamme complete de variation genetique presente chez les lignees parentales. Mots-cles : aubergine, [F.sub.2], marqueurs moleculaires, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae. [Traduit par la Redaction]
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F 2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum ;; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F 2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F 2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F 2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines 305E40 and 67/3. The former incorporates an introgressed segment from Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group carrying the gene Rfo-sa1, which confers resistance to Fusarium oxysporum; the latter is a selection from an intraspecific cross involving two conventional eggplant varieties and lacks Rfo-sa1. Initially, 28 AFLP primer combinations (PCs) were applied to a sample of 93 F2 individuals and 93 DH individuals, from which 170 polymorphic AFLP fragments were identified. In the DH population, the segregation of 117 of these AFLPs as well as markers closely linked to Rfo-sa1 was substantially distorted, while in the F2 population, segregation distortion was restricted to just 10 markers, and thus the latter was chosen for map development. A set of 141 F2 individuals was genotyped with 73 AFLP PCs (generating 406 informative markers), 32 SSRs, 4 tomato RFLPs, and 3 CAPS markers linked to Rfo-sa1. This resulted in the assignment of 348 markers to 12 major linkage groups. The framework map covered 718.7 cM, comprising 238 markers (212 AFLPs, 22 SSRs, 1 RFLP, and the Rfo-sa1 CAPS). Marker order and inter-marker distances in this eggplant map were largely consistent with those reported in a recently published SSR-based map. From an eggplant breeding perspective, DH populations produced by anther culture appear to be subject to massive segregation distortion and thus may not be very efficient in capturing the full range of genetic variation present in the parental lines.
Abstract_FL Une population d'haploïdes doublés (HD), obtenue par culture d'anthères, et une population F 2 ont été développées à partir d'un croisement intraspécifique entre deux lignées de sélectionneur (305E40 et 67/3) chez l'aubergine. La première contient un segment introgressé en provenance du Solanum aethiopicum Gilo Group, lequel comprend le gène Rfo-sa1 qui confère la résistance au Fusarium oxysporum. La seconde lignée est une sélection retenue au sein d'un croisement intraspécifique entre deux cultivars conventionnels d'aubergine qui étaient dépourvus du gène Rfo-sa1. Initialement, 28 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP ont été employées sur 93 individus F 2 et 93 HD pour identifier 170 amplicons AFLP polymorphes. Au sein de la population HD, la ségrégation de 117 de ces AFLP ainsi que tous les marqueurs fortement liés au gène Rfo-sa1 était significativement biaisée. Par contre, au sein de la population F 2 , le biais était limité à seulement 10 marqueurs ;; cette dernière population a donc été retenue pour le développement d'une carte. Une collection de 142 individus F 2 a été examinée avec 73 combinaisons d'amorces AFLP (générant 406 marqueurs), 32 SSR, quatre RFLP de tomate et trois marqueurs CAPS liés au gène Rfo-sa1. Cela a permis d'assigner 348 marqueurs à l'un de 12 groupes de liaison majeurs. La carte cadre s'étend sur 718,7 cM, compte 238 marqueurs (212 AFLP, 22 SSR, un RFLP et les marqueurs CAPS liés à Rfo-sa1). L'ordre des marqueurs et les distances qui les séparent dans cette carte de l'aubergine étaient largement conformes à ce qui a été rapporté récemment pour une carte fondée sur des SSR. Dans une perspective d'amélioration génétique, les populations HD produites par culture d'anthères semblent sujettes à des biais de ségrégation massifs et ainsi ne seraient pas très efficaces pour capture la gamme complète de variation génétique présente chez les lignées parentales.
Audience Academic
Author Stàgel, Anikò
Barchi, Lorenzo
Lanteri, Sergio
Toppino, Laura
Rotino, Giuseppe Leonardo
Valè, Giampiero
Portis, Ezio
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lorenzo
  surname: Barchi
  fullname: Barchi, Lorenzo
  organization: University of Turin, Department of Exploitation and Protection of the Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Di.Va.P.R.A.), Plant Genetics and Breeding, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Sergio
  surname: Lanteri
  fullname: Lanteri, Sergio
  email: sergio.lanteri@unito.it
  organization: University of Turin, Department of Exploitation and Protection of the Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Di.Va.P.R.A.), Plant Genetics and Breeding, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ezio
  surname: Portis
  fullname: Portis, Ezio
  organization: University of Turin, Department of Exploitation and Protection of the Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Di.Va.P.R.A.), Plant Genetics and Breeding, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Anikò
  surname: Stàgel
  fullname: Stàgel, Anikò
  organization: University of Turin, Department of Exploitation and Protection of the Agricultural and Forestry Resources (Di.Va.P.R.A.), Plant Genetics and Breeding, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Giampiero
  surname: Valè
  fullname: Valè, Giampiero
  organization: Agricultural Research Council, Genomics Research Centre (CRA-GPG), Via S. Protaso 302, 29017 Fiorenzuola d'Arda (PC), Italy
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Laura
  surname: Toppino
  fullname: Toppino, Laura
  organization: Agricultural Research Council, Research Unit for Vegetable Crops (CRA-ORL), Via Paullese 28, 26836 Montanaso Lombardo (LO), Italy
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Giuseppe Leonardo
  surname: Rotino
  fullname: Rotino, Giuseppe Leonardo
  organization: Agricultural Research Council, Research Unit for Vegetable Crops (CRA-ORL), Via Paullese 28, 26836 Montanaso Lombardo (LO), Italy
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20962887$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqV0u9r1DAYB_AgE3c7xf9AygbqhJ550l6avhxD5-CY4OnrkKZPa2ab3JIW3H9vbrcf3jwRyYuE8MmX5MlzQPass0jIS6AzgKx8fwY0pUX2hEwgFzTNMgZ7ZEJFBikrSr5PDkK4pBRoVsIzss9oyZkQxYRcLLH12KrBOJvUJgzO3yyVrZPO2B-qxbhW3XUwITE2wbZddcoOyduli_PYJz12zrZoVbKYHT8nTxvVBXxxO0_Jt48fvp5-Shefz85PTxap5gUMaa6gAtbUilWU5zAHJTTP8znGjVorzhrQoHmZAVaoaFMVAmiuGeRFxWnNsil5s8ldeXc1Yhhkb4LGLl4J3RikKBiwMs_EP2UxL0UxB06jPHwkL93o49vXSAjOIQZOydEGtapDaWzjBq_0OlKesBxisSmHqNIdKhYJvYrVwsbE7S1_uMPrlbmSv6PZDhRHjb3RO1OPtw5EM-DPoVVjCPJ8-eU_7MW2fXVbqLHqsZYrb3rlr-VdVz08X3sXgsdGajPctFi8sekkULnuWhm7Vsauffije38X-ad8vZHWa48Bldff73G7QXJVNxG--zt8nPoLHqb_GQ
CODEN GENOE3
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_015_2632_8
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants12051016
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scienta_2011_03_034
crossref_primary_10_3390_cells11162548
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_014_0350_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_012_0652_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_731079
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2018_00401
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0073702
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2016_00256
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13562_020_00549_w
crossref_primary_10_1038_hdy_2013_127
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2021_638195
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_012_1815_9
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_011_0490_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1439_0523_2011_01948_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11192627
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scienta_2013_08_004
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes11070745
crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2021_1941605
crossref_primary_10_3390_biology10070685
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_12_304
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0089499
crossref_primary_10_1038_hdy_2012_89
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_017_2102_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00122_012_1796_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12298_020_00800_7
crossref_primary_10_17660_ActaHortic_2016_1145_2
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0128588
crossref_primary_10_1186_1471_2164_15_896
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10681_014_1096_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_1939_8433_6_6
crossref_primary_10_1270_jsbbs_20004
Cites_doi 10.1007/s001220050535
10.1139/g87-026
10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00115.x
10.1007/s00122-008-0864-6
10.1007/s001220051218
10.1007/s00122-009-1116-0
10.1007/s11032-008-9170-x
10.1093/genetics/131.3.733
10.1007/s00122-004-1728-3
10.1007/s001220100584
10.1007/s10681-008-9805-3
10.1007/s10722-009-9459-6
10.1534/genetics.106.062455
10.1007/s00438-007-0248-7
10.1007/BF00220999
10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00816.x
10.1007/s00122-009-0980-y
10.1007/BF00226259
10.1093/genetics/53.1.85
10.1007/BF00220861
10.1139/G06-140
10.1093/genetics/126.3.735
10.1007/BF00220998
10.1007/s001220050008
10.1007/s00122-005-2023-7
10.1139/g93-056
10.1270/jsbbs.55.287
10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
10.1007/s004380050355
10.1093/genetics/132.4.1141
10.1139/g02-053
10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60428-9
10.1093/genetics/127.1.181
10.1007/s00122-008-0950-9
10.1007/s001220050752
10.1007/BF03041375
10.1023/B:MOLB.0000022526.30914.31
10.1023/A:1015861610226
10.1093/genetics/151.4.1559
10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
10.1007/BF00021903
10.1266/ggs.71.37
10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01235.x
10.1093/genetics/158.2.787
10.1270/jsbbs.51.19
10.1007/s00122-002-1083-1
10.2307/2407034
10.1093/genetics/159.4.1701
10.1111/j.1469-1809.1943.tb02321.x
10.1139/g95-014
10.1007/s00122-002-0970-9
10.1007/s00299-001-0429-5
10.1093/genetics/112.4.887
10.1007/BF00022739
10.1093/genetics/161.4.1697
10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01159.x
10.1186/1471-2164-9-357
10.1139/g92-086
10.1177/003072707400800209
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2010 NRC Research Press
Copyright National Research Council of Canada Oct 2010
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2010 NRC Research Press
– notice: Copyright National Research Council of Canada Oct 2010
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISN
ISR
7SS
7TK
7TM
7U9
8FD
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
RC3
7X8
DOI 10.1139/G10-073
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Canada
Gale In Context: Science
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Neurosciences Abstracts
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Engineering Research Database
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Nucleic Acids Abstracts
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
Neurosciences Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList




CrossRef
MEDLINE
Entomology Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Biology
EISSN 1480-3321
EndPage 815
ExternalDocumentID 2165347641
A241279061
20962887
10_1139_G10_073
g10-073
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Feature
GeographicLocations Italy
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Italy
GroupedDBID 02
08R
0R
1AW
29H
3O-
3V.
4.4
4IJ
53G
5GY
5RE
5RP
7X2
7X7
88A
88E
88I
8AF
8AO
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FQ
8G5
ABDBF
ABFLS
ABPTK
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACGOD
ACNCT
ACPRK
ADACO
ADKZR
AENEX
AFKRA
AFRAH
AHMBA
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBAFP
BBNVY
BCR
BENPR
BHPHI
BLC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
COF
CS3
D8U
DU5
DWQXO
EAD
EAP
EBD
EBS
ECC
EDH
EJD
EMK
EPL
EST
ESX
ET
F5P
FYUFA
G8K
GJ
GNUQQ
GUQSH
HCIFZ
HZ
H~9
IAG
IAO
ICQ
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
IOF
ISN
ISR
ITC
KM
L7B
LK8
M0K
M0L
M1P
M2O
M2P
M2Q
M3C
M3G
M7P
MBDVC
MV1
NMEPN
NRXXU
NYCZX
O9-
OVD
PADUT
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
PSQYO
PV9
QF4
QM4
QM9
QN7
QO4
QRP
RIG
RRCRK
RRP
RZL
TUS
U5U
X
XHC
YYQ
ZCG
ZGI
-ET
-~X
.GJ
00T
0R~
2QL
36B
AAHBH
AAYXX
ABDPE
ABJNI
ACGFO
ACUHS
AEGXH
AEUYN
ALIPV
APEBS
CCPQU
CITATION
DATHI
EMB
EMOBN
GJPHO
HMCUK
HZ~
IPNFZ
ONR
PHGZM
PHGZT
SV3
TEORI
TR2
UKHRP
VQG
~02
~KM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7SS
7TK
7TM
7U9
8FD
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
RC3
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c671t-4a1b12fda2b064151a8c6445ea2bdca62f1c1c6931ebea0fb78104c2147b60d23
ISSN 0831-2796
1480-3321
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 01:48:09 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:44:39 EDT 2025
Mon Jun 30 08:49:50 EDT 2025
Wed Mar 19 02:12:42 EDT 2025
Fri Mar 14 03:40:34 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 15:37:06 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 18:55:48 EST 2025
Wed Mar 05 06:12:36 EST 2025
Wed Mar 05 05:38:51 EST 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:47:48 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:30:11 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:18 EDT 2025
Thu May 23 14:20:26 EDT 2019
Wed Nov 11 00:32:56 EST 2020
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 10
Language English
License http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/page/about/CorporateTextAndDataMining
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c671t-4a1b12fda2b064151a8c6445ea2bdca62f1c1c6931ebea0fb78104c2147b60d23
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
PMID 20962887
PQID 758866194
PQPubID 34326
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A241279061
proquest_journals_758866194
pubmed_primary_20962887
gale_infotraccpiq_241279061
gale_infotracmisc_A241279061
nrcresearch_primary_10_1139_G10_073
proquest_miscellaneous_872129438
crossref_citationtrail_10_1139_G10_073
proquest_miscellaneous_759875160
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A241279061
gale_incontextgauss_ISN_A241279061
crossref_primary_10_1139_G10_073
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A241279061
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 20101000
2010-10-00
2010-Oct
20101001
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-10-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2010
  text: 20101000
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Canada
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Canada
– name: Ottawa
PublicationTitle Genome
PublicationTitleAlternate Génome
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher NRC Research Press
Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
Publisher_xml – name: NRC Research Press
– name: Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press
References rg32/ref32
rg72/ref72
Bernatzky R. (rg5/ref5) 1986; 112
Boersma J.G. (rg6/ref6) 2005; 10
Pradhan A.K. (rg48/ref48) 2003; 106
Lorieux M. (rg36/ref36) 1995; 90
rg53/ref53
rg24/ref24
rg61/ref61
rg18/ref18
Lukacsovich T. (rg38/ref38) 1999; 151
rg10/ref10
rg4/ref4
rg50/ref50
rg64/ref64
rg13/ref13
rg29/ref29
Keim P. (rg21/ref21) 1990; 126
rg31/ref31
rg67/ref67
Stravato V.M. (rg57/ref57) 1993; 43
rg42/ref42
rg56/ref56
rg8/ref8
rg2/ref2
rg45/ref45
rg71/ref71
rg37/ref37
rg20/ref20
Cervera M.T. (rg7/ref7) 2001; 158
Paterson A.H. (rg46/ref46) 1991; 127
rg34/ref34
rg1/ref1
Kishi K. (rg23/ref23) 1974; 8
rg41/ref41
Liedl B.E. (rg33/ref33) 1993; 11
rg59/ref59
rg52/ref52
rg66/ref66
Vallejos C.E. (rg63/ref63) 1992; 131
rg16/ref16
rg55/ref55
rg69/ref69
rg70/ref70
Kuang H. (rg26/ref26) 1999; 99
rg27/ref27
rg30/ref30
rg44/ref44
rg58/ref58
rg22/ref22
Kosambi D. (rg25/ref25) 1944; 12
Urrutia Herrada M. (rg62/ref62) 2004; 30
rg49/ref49
rg47/ref47
rg9/ref9
Mangelsdorf P. (rg39/ref39) 1926; 279
Lanteri S. (rg28/ref28) 1991; 45
rg65/ref65
rg11/ref11
Tanksley S.D. (rg60/ref60) 1992; 132
rg3/ref3
rg17/ref17
Fishman L. (rg15/ref15) 2001; 159
rg43/ref43
Lorieux M. (rg35/ref35) 1995; 90
Doganlar S. (rg12/ref12) 2002; 161
rg14/ref14
Rick C.M. (rg51/ref51) 1966; 53
Jackson J.A. (rg19/ref19) 2000; 28
rg54/ref54
rg68/ref68
rg40/ref40
References_xml – ident: rg9/ref9
  doi: 10.1007/s001220050535
– ident: rg17/ref17
  doi: 10.1139/g87-026
– volume: 10
  start-page: 331
  issue: 2
  year: 2005
  ident: rg6/ref6
  publication-title: Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett.
– ident: rg1/ref1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00115.x
– ident: rg41/ref41
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0864-6
– volume: 99
  start-page: 140
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: rg26/ref26
  publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet.
  doi: 10.1007/s001220051218
– ident: rg44/ref44
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1116-0
– ident: rg61/ref61
  doi: 10.1007/s11032-008-9170-x
– volume: 131
  start-page: 733
  issue: 3
  year: 1992
  ident: rg63/ref63
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.3.733
– ident: rg13/ref13
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1728-3
– ident: rg14/ref14
  doi: 10.1007/s001220100584
– ident: rg20/ref20
  doi: 10.1007/s10681-008-9805-3
– ident: rg47/ref47
  doi: 10.1007/s10722-009-9459-6
– ident: rg68/ref68
  doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.062455
– ident: rg34/ref34
– ident: rg27/ref27
  doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0248-7
– volume: 28
  start-page: 914
  issue: 5
  year: 2000
  ident: rg19/ref19
  publication-title: Biotechniques
– volume: 90
  start-page: 81
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: rg36/ref36
  publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet.
  doi: 10.1007/BF00220999
– volume: 30
  start-page: 85
  issue: 1
  year: 2004
  ident: rg62/ref62
  publication-title: Bol. Sanid. Veg., Plagas
– ident: rg43/ref43
  doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2003.00816.x
– ident: rg69/ref69
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-0980-y
– ident: rg18/ref18
  doi: 10.1007/BF00226259
– volume: 53
  start-page: 85
  issue: 1
  year: 1966
  ident: rg51/ref51
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/53.1.85
– ident: rg24/ref24
  doi: 10.1007/BF00220861
– ident: rg3/ref3
  doi: 10.1139/G06-140
– volume: 126
  start-page: 735
  issue: 3
  year: 1990
  ident: rg21/ref21
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/126.3.735
– volume: 90
  start-page: 73
  issue: 1
  year: 1995
  ident: rg35/ref35
  publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet.
  doi: 10.1007/BF00220998
– ident: rg40/ref40
  doi: 10.1007/s001220050008
– ident: rg16/ref16
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-005-2023-7
– ident: rg49/ref49
  doi: 10.1139/g93-056
– ident: rg58/ref58
  doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.55.287
– ident: rg66/ref66
  doi: 10.1093/jhered/93.1.77
– ident: rg71/ref71
  doi: 10.1007/s004380050355
– volume: 132
  start-page: 1141
  issue: 4
  year: 1992
  ident: rg60/ref60
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.4.1141
– ident: rg64/ref64
– ident: rg31/ref31
  doi: 10.1139/g02-053
– ident: rg55/ref55
  doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60428-9
– volume: 127
  start-page: 181
  issue: 1
  year: 1991
  ident: rg46/ref46
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.1.181
– volume: 45
  start-page: 51
  year: 1991
  ident: rg28/ref28
  publication-title: J. Genet. Breed.
– ident: rg53/ref53
– ident: rg70/ref70
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0950-9
– ident: rg50/ref50
  doi: 10.1007/s001220050752
– ident: rg65/ref65
  doi: 10.1007/BF03041375
– ident: rg45/ref45
  doi: 10.1023/B:MOLB.0000022526.30914.31
– ident: rg54/ref54
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015861610226
– ident: rg22/ref22
– volume: 151
  start-page: 1559
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: rg38/ref38
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1559
– volume: 279
  start-page: 513
  year: 1926
  ident: rg39/ref39
  publication-title: Conn. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull.
– ident: rg67/ref67
  doi: 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407
– ident: rg11/ref11
– ident: rg59/ref59
  doi: 10.1007/BF00021903
– ident: rg72/ref72
  doi: 10.1266/ggs.71.37
– ident: rg2/ref2
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01235.x
– volume: 158
  start-page: 787
  issue: 2
  year: 2001
  ident: rg7/ref7
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.787
– ident: rg42/ref42
  doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.51.19
– volume: 43
  start-page: 51
  year: 1993
  ident: rg57/ref57
  publication-title: Inf. Fitopatol.
– volume: 106
  start-page: 607
  issue: 4
  year: 2003
  ident: rg48/ref48
  publication-title: Theor. Appl. Genet.
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1083-1
– ident: rg10/ref10
– ident: rg32/ref32
  doi: 10.2307/2407034
– volume: 159
  start-page: 1701
  issue: 4
  year: 2001
  ident: rg15/ref15
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/159.4.1701
– volume: 12
  start-page: 172
  year: 1944
  ident: rg25/ref25
  publication-title: Ann. Eugen.
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1943.tb02321.x
– ident: rg30/ref30
  doi: 10.1139/g95-014
– ident: rg37/ref37
  doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-0970-9
– ident: rg52/ref52
  doi: 10.1007/s00299-001-0429-5
– volume: 112
  start-page: 887
  issue: 4
  year: 1986
  ident: rg5/ref5
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/112.4.887
– ident: rg29/ref29
  doi: 10.1007/BF00022739
– volume: 161
  start-page: 1697
  issue: 4
  year: 2002
  ident: rg12/ref12
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/161.4.1697
– ident: rg8/ref8
  doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01159.x
– ident: rg56/ref56
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-357
– ident: rg4/ref4
  doi: 10.1139/g92-086
– volume: 8
  start-page: 100
  year: 1974
  ident: rg23/ref23
  publication-title: Outlook Agric.
  doi: 10.1177/003072707400800209
– volume: 11
  start-page: 11
  year: 1993
  ident: rg33/ref33
  publication-title: Plant Breed. Rev.
SSID ssj0010391
Score 2.1555035
Snippet An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F 2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines...
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F2 mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding lines...
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an [F.sub.2] mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding...
An anther-derived doubled haploid (DH) population and an F sub(2) mapping population were developed from an intraspecific hybrid between the eggplant breeding...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
nrcresearch
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 805
SubjectTerms aubergine
Chromosome Mapping
Chromosome Segregation - genetics
Chromosomes, Plant - genetics
Crosses, Genetic
Eggplant
Fusarium
Fusarium oxysporum
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melongenae
Genetic aspects
Genetic diversity
Genetic Linkage
Genetic Markers - physiology
Genetic variation
Genomics
Genotype
Genotype & phenotype
Lycopersicon esculentum
marqueurs moléculaires
molecular markers
Molecular structure
Plant breeding
Polymorphism
Quantitative Trait Loci
Sequence Alignment
Solanum
Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena - genetics
Tomatoes
Vegetables
Title Segregation distortion and linkage analysis in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.)
URI http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/G10-073
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20962887
https://www.proquest.com/docview/758866194
https://www.proquest.com/docview/759875160
https://www.proquest.com/docview/872129438
Volume 53
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3rj5NAEN9oGxP9YHxb79SNmlNzobK8-djqPTTnmdi75L6RZWGxsULt44P9651hFwp3bXx8IWRngIUZhpll5jeEvPJSxriTSMNz_FAFKGHIA0NK4cTgwLtJCabz-dQ7Pnc-XbgX65SgsrpkEffFamNdyf9IFcZArlgl-w-SrU8KA7AP8oUtSBi2fyXjUQrRcqZEmJR4H4squxh_zGI6Dq9ARxAaJMumE64gRvdHENNiFvyPdFJgfRXfP-lXywLaWT1K8wrLoFzrxH8OZRxfzNJ8VdS5PKVwSgpYnmxcEzBLVUEYHKzWo6NF-XPezHR-QD7-jgNDq7kAgckcZrUAoe2UzQzLDzWitbKjTgDm3VbFz5WhVajAlUKZDbMZmG7zC6wKPK8adxuxUY_w8qr9SRs--9JnrU42LMMcO4zgwAgOvE66FoQUVod0B8MPw8Puut-F6q9Y3Y4qscZD3-lrtnwX_QW_lc-ExmX6tj1KKb2Vszvktg4z6EDpzF1yLc3vkRuq8eiv--RLQ3PoWnMoaA7VmkMrzaHjnFaaQ99QrTe01ht60n_7gJwfHpy9PzZ0aw1DeD5bGA5nMbNkwq0YfFLw-nggwDN2UxhIBPcsyQQTXmgzeMm5KWM_gLhdYFOr2DMTy35IOnmRp48JtUPJpZMy34xDR0oeYGGJYLFEzydmrEf2qocWCY07j-1PJtElwfQIrRmnCmrlKssLfOoRApfkmBmV8eV8Hn0cnUYDcEVBauCebmX62mJ6rZlkAbMRXFejwD0hIFqLc6fFKabjn1GDuteiZgosftNpdluMYMVFi_yyoUjb7__5Jq5MUaNpImG2lQpG2lLNI98NAg-XK-ER11ScACZY5mmxRJYw8F3mmdtZAh_c3NCxgx55pHS7noBlhti23H_yZxHukJtrI7JLOovZMn0Kfv0ifqZfyN8BRvF7
linkProvider EBSCOhost
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Segregation+distortion+and+linkage+analysis+in+eggplant+%28+Solanum+melongena+L.%29&rft.jtitle=Genome&rft.au=Barchi%2C+Lorenzo&rft.au=Lanteri%2C+Sergio&rft.au=Portis%2C+Ezio&rft.au=St%C3%A0gel%2C+Anik%C3%B2&rft.date=2010-10-01&rft.issn=0831-2796&rft.eissn=1480-3321&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=805&rft.epage=815&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139%2FG10-073&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1139_G10_073
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0831-2796&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0831-2796&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0831-2796&client=summon