Polymerization shrinkage of light-cured conventional and bulk-fill composites —The effect of cavity depth and post-curing

Volumetric shrinkage (VS) of conventional, bulk-fill, and core build-up resin-based composites (RBCs) of various thickness (1–5 mm) was measured using the modified bonded-disk method with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Additionally, the bottom-to-top ratio of Vickers hardness (%VH) was measured...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 426 - 432
Main Authors AKIYA, Satoshi, SATO, Kento, KIBE, Kouta, TICHY, Antonin, HIRAISHI, Noriko, PRASANSUTTIPORN, Taweesak, HOSAKA, Keiichi, FOXTON, Richard M., SHIMADA, Yasushi, NAKAJIMA, Masatoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 25.05.2023
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Volumetric shrinkage (VS) of conventional, bulk-fill, and core build-up resin-based composites (RBCs) of various thickness (1–5 mm) was measured using the modified bonded-disk method with confocal laser scanning microscopy. Additionally, the bottom-to-top ratio of Vickers hardness (%VH) was measured. Conventional RBCs exhibited significantly higher VS than bulk-fill and core build-up RBCs (p<0.05). As specimen thickness increased, VS relative to volume (%VS) and difference in VS at each depth (VSdepth) decreased. For conventional RBCs, there was a significant drop in VSdepth between 1 mm and 2 mm (p<0.05), and another drop was observed between 3 mm and 4 mm (p<0.05) where %VH decreased below 90%. For bulk-fill and core build-up RBCs, VSdepth decreased significantly between 2 mm and 3 mm (p<0.05), but %VH exceeded 90% even in 5 mm deep cavities. These results indicated that post-curing contributed to lower shrinkage in deeper layers, and that conventional RBCs were not adequately polymerized at the depth of over 3 mm.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0287-4547
1881-1361
DOI:10.4012/dmj.2022-210