The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes

Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 213; no. 3; pp. 390.e1 - 390.e7
Main Authors Carter, Ebony B., Bishop, Katherine C., Goetzinger, Katherine R., Tuuli, Methodius G., Cahill, Alison G.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0002-9378
1097-6868
1097-6868
DOI10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01). There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.
AbstractList Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01). There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.
Objective Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Results Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins ( P  < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins ( P  = .01). Conclusion There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.
Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01). There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.
Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.OBJECTIVEWomen carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).RESULTSOf 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.CONCLUSIONThere are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.
Author Carter, Ebony B.
Goetzinger, Katherine R.
Bishop, Katherine C.
Cahill, Alison G.
Tuuli, Methodius G.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Ebony B.
  orcidid: 0000-0002-7620-4929
  surname: Carter
  fullname: Carter, Ebony B.
  email: cartere@wustl.edu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Katherine C.
  orcidid: 0000-0003-2517-8799
  surname: Bishop
  fullname: Bishop, Katherine C.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Katherine R.
  surname: Goetzinger
  fullname: Goetzinger, Katherine R.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Methodius G.
  surname: Tuuli
  fullname: Tuuli, Methodius G.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Alison G.
  surname: Cahill
  fullname: Cahill, Alison G.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFUcFq3DAUFCWl2aT9gR6Kj714-yTbklxKIYQ2KQR6aHoWWvkpkWtLW8ku7N9XYpNLoCk8EBIz8zQzZ-TEB4-EvKWwpUD5h3Grx3C3ZUC7LeRh4gXZUOhFzSWXJ2QDAKzuGyFPyVlKY7mynr0ip6zrJYem3ZD-9h4rN--1WapgK3MfogveGbccquCrWS8YvZ6qfcQ7r73Jr-tiwozpNXlp9ZTwzcN5Tn5-_XJ7eV3ffL_6dnlxUxvO5VK3zOqG0aHX1BojBtQa-07uTKvpQHFnrRYds5QLAUBti8Bl3zZWtEZYbEVzTt4fdfcx_F4xLWp2yeA0aY9hTYoKkLKXTPAMffcAXXczDmof3azjQT3azQB5BJgYUopoVTaql-x4idpNioIqyapRlWRVSVZBHla-wZ5QH9WfJX06kjAH9MdhVMk49AYHF9EsagjuefrnJ3QzuVyOnn7hAdMY1tJNjkAlpkD9KAWXumkH0EFTBD7-W-B_2_8CoTy6AQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2015_12_131
crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2015_1092957
crossref_primary_10_1159_000541457
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preghy_2021_02_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2021_06_044
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2024_2345294
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_placenta_2015_11_010
crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0000000000001846
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_657862
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1821640
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_081X_18_89342_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2018_02_010
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2023_2240467
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2019_05_009
crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evac164
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1745_3118
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9103276
crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2023_132381
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13092673
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep26869
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1230194
crossref_primary_10_1017_thg_2016_74
crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9010183
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_10_040
crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13981
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2021_100396
crossref_primary_10_1017_thg_2016_17
crossref_primary_10_17343_sdutfd_631022
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1945574
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diabres_2020_108623
crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_16479
Cites_doi 10.1002/uog.10057
10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.783
10.1080/00016340802050668
10.1097/AOG.0b013e318269baac
10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x
10.1080/14767050802663194
10.3109/14767058.2013.777701
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.024
10.1097/00006250-200006000-00022
10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00314-X
10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.007
10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1
10.1375/twin.9.5.664
10.1067/mob.2002.121721
10.3109/14767058.2014.899576
10.1002/uog.14760
10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10577.x
10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02958.x
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.007
10.1055/s-2001-12937
10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00470.x
10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70324-8
10.1093/humrep/der213
10.3109/10641959909016193
10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002
10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.044
10.1080/15513819609168713
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195065
10.1375/twin.9.3.450
10.1038/sj.jp.7200292
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1097-6868
EndPage 390.e7
ExternalDocumentID 25986034
10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027
S0002937815005037
1_s2_0_S0002937815005037
Genre Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: 5T32HD055172-05
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
– fundername: NICHD NIH HHS
  grantid: 5T32HD055172-05
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-ET
.1-
.55
.FO
.GJ
.XZ
.~1
0R~
1B1
1CY
1P~
1~.
1~5
23M
2KS
354
3O-
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5GY
5RE
5VS
6J9
7-5
85S
8F7
8P~
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKC
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAMNW
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYJJ
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABCQX
ABDPE
ABFNM
ABFRF
ABJNI
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABOCM
ABPMR
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACRLP
ACRPL
ACVFH
ADBBV
ADCNI
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
ADVLN
AEBSH
AEFWE
AEIPS
AEKER
AENEX
AEUPX
AEVXI
AFCHL
AFFNX
AFJKZ
AFPUW
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGNAY
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AHDLI
AI.
AIEXJ
AIGII
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
AKBMS
AKRWK
AKYEP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
APXCP
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
C45
C5W
CAG
COF
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EX3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IH2
IHE
J1W
K-O
KOM
LPU
M41
MO0
N4W
N9A
NEJ
NQ-
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OBH
OCB
OGEVE
OHH
OHT
OMK
OQ.
OVD
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
PH~
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
RXW
SDF
SEL
SES
SEW
SJN
SPCBC
SSH
SSZ
T5K
TAE
TEORI
TWZ
UDS
UGJ
UHB
UHS
UHU
UKR
UNMZH
UV1
VH1
VVN
WH7
WOQ
WOW
X6Y
X7M
XFW
YFH
YOC
YYQ
YZZ
Z5R
ZGI
ZXP
ZY1
~G-
~H1
AACTN
AFCTW
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
NCXOZ
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
ADOJD
AFDAS
AHPSJ
AJBFU
EFLBG
G8K
LCYCR
ZA5
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-42fa321d9a1fcc7deaae958bc4a1d1ebffa752f1677001f4e068943f74c7fe473
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 0002-9378
1097-6868
IngestDate Mon Jul 21 10:01:57 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 01:58:30 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:55:56 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:50:54 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:29:20 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:22 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 17:15:27 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Keywords twins
pregnancy outcomes
chorionicity
Language English
License https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c668t-42fa321d9a1fcc7deaae958bc4a1d1ebffa752f1677001f4e068943f74c7fe473
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-2517-8799
0000-0002-7620-4929
PMID 25986034
PQID 1708898276
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1708898276
pubmed_primary_25986034
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0002937815005037
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
PublicationTitleAlternate Am J Obstet Gynecol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Carroll, Tyfield, Reeve, Porter, Soothill, Kyle (bib31) 2005; 193
Rana, Hacker, Modest (bib23) 2012; 60
Hack, Derks, Elias (bib5) 2008; 115
Masheer, Maheen, Munim (bib8) 2015; 28
Savvidou, Karanastasi, Skentou, Geerts, Nicolaides (bib19) 2001; 18
Dubé, Dodds, Armson (bib2) 2002; 186
Campbell, Templeton (bib12) 2004; 84
Conde-Agudelo, Belizan, Lindmark (bib13) 2000; 95
Bleker, Breur, Huidekoper (bib26) 1979; 86
Gielen, Lindsey, Derom (bib25) 2006; 9
Victoria, Mora, Arias (bib11) 2001; 97
Quintero, Morales, Allen, Bornick, Johnson, Kruger (bib17) 1999; 19
Pinar, Sung, Oyer, Singer (bib27) 1996; 16
Sherer (bib10) 2001; 18
Roach, Lau, Wilson, Rogers (bib16) 1998; 38
Rao, Sairam, Shehata (bib14) 2004; 18
Glinianaia, Obeysekera, Sturgiss, Bell (bib3) 2011; 26
Lopriore, Stroeken, Sueters, Meerman, Walther, Vandenbussche (bib32) 2008; 87
Acosta-Rojas, Becker, Munoz-Abellana (bib1) 2007; 96
Leduc, Takser, Rinfret (bib7) 2005; 193
Hack, Derks, de Visser, Elias, Visser (bib4) 2006; 9
Campbell, MacGillivray (bib20) 1999; 18
Schwartz, Daoud, Zazula (bib30) 1999; 181
Bdolah, Lam, Rajakumar (bib22) 2008; 198
Weis, Harper, Roehl, Odibo, Cahill (bib29) 2012; 120
Rauh-Hain, Rana, Tamez (bib15) 2009; 22
Oldenburg, Rode, Bodker (bib9) 2012; 39
(bib18) 2013; 122
Singh, Singh, Surapaneni, Nirmalan (bib28) 2014; 8
Sparks, Cheng, Phan, Caughey (bib21) 2013; 26
Dröge, Herraìz, Zeisler (bib24) 2015; 45
Harper, Weis, Odibo, Roehl, Macones, Cahill (bib6) 2013; 208
Victoria (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib11) 2001; 97
Quintero (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib17) 1999; 19
Masheer (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib8) 2015; 28
Gielen (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib25) 2006; 9
Bleker (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib26) 1979; 86
Pinar (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib27) 1996; 16
Rao (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib14) 2004; 18
Harper (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib6) 2013; 208
Sparks (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib21) 2013; 26
Dröge (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib24) 2015; 45
Glinianaia (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib3) 2011; 26
Roach (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib16) 1998; 38
(10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib18) 2013; 122
Oldenburg (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib9) 2012; 39
Schwartz (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib30) 1999; 181
Rana (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib23) 2012; 60
Campbell (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib20) 1999; 18
Savvidou (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib19) 2001; 18
Bdolah (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib22) 2008; 198
Conde-Agudelo (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib13) 2000; 95
Hack (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib4) 2006; 9
Hack (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib5) 2008; 115
Singh (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib28) 2014; 8
Acosta-Rojas (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib1) 2007; 96
Sherer (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib10) 2001; 18
Campbell (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib12) 2004; 84
Lopriore (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib32) 2008; 87
Dubé (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib2) 2002; 186
Weis (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib29) 2012; 120
Carroll (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib31) 2005; 193
Leduc (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib7) 2005; 193
Rauh-Hain (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib15) 2009; 22
References_xml – volume: 8
  start-page: 100
  year: 2014
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib28
  article-title: Pre-eclampsia and chorionicity in women with twin gestations
  publication-title: J Clin Diagn Res
– volume: 95
  start-page: 899
  year: 2000
  end-page: 904
  ident: bib13
  article-title: Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 122
  start-page: 406
  year: 2013
  end-page: 416
  ident: bib18
  article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 137
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 87
  start-page: 541
  year: 2008
  end-page: 545
  ident: bib32
  article-title: Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1670
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1675
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 60
  start-page: 451
  year: 2012
  end-page: 458
  ident: bib23
  article-title: Circulating angiogenic factors and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with suspected preeclampsia
  publication-title: Hypertension
– volume: 16
  start-page: 901
  year: 1996
  end-page: 907
  ident: bib27
  article-title: Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights
  publication-title: Pediatr Pathol Lab Med
– volume: 45
  start-page: 286
  year: 2015
  end-page: 293
  ident: bib24
  article-title: Maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in twin pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia in comparison with singleton pregnancies
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 293
  year: 2009
  end-page: 299
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
– volume: 9
  start-page: 450
  year: 2006
  end-page: 455
  ident: bib4
  article-title: The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort
  publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet
– volume: 18
  start-page: 197
  year: 1999
  end-page: 207
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: incidence and outcome
  publication-title: Hypertens Pregnancy
– volume: 181
  start-page: 912
  year: 1999
  end-page: 914
  ident: bib30
  article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 193
  start-page: 757
  year: 2005
  end-page: 761
  ident: bib31
  article-title: Is zygosity or chorionicity the main determinant of fetal outcome in twin pregnancies?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 557
  year: 2004
  end-page: 576
  ident: bib14
  article-title: Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 97
  start-page: 310
  year: 2001
  end-page: 315
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 120
  start-page: 753
  year: 2012
  end-page: 758
  ident: bib29
  article-title: Natural history of placenta previa in twins
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 84
  start-page: 71
  year: 2004
  end-page: 73
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Maternal complications of twin pregnancy
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
– volume: 28
  start-page: 23
  year: 2015
  end-page: 25
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
– volume: 18
  start-page: 23
  year: 2001
  end-page: 37
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
– volume: 186
  start-page: 579
  year: 2002
  end-page: 583
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 208
  start-page: 393.e1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 393.e5
  ident: bib6
  article-title: Significance of growth discordance in appropriately grown twins
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1277
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Does risk of preeclampsia differ by twin chorionicity?
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
– volume: 96
  start-page: 98
  year: 2007
  end-page: 102
  ident: bib1
  article-title: Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
– volume: 19
  start-page: 550
  year: 1999
  end-page: 555
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
  publication-title: J Perinatol
– volume: 9
  start-page: 664
  year: 2006
  end-page: 672
  ident: bib25
  article-title: Curves of placental weights of live-born twins
  publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet
– volume: 38
  start-page: 56
  year: 1998
  end-page: 57
  ident: bib16
  article-title: The incidence of gestational diabetes in multiple pregnancy
  publication-title: Austr N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 26
  start-page: 2549
  year: 2011
  end-page: 2557
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
– volume: 198
  start-page: 428.e1
  year: 2008
  end-page: 428.e6
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: bigger placenta or relative ischemia?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 18
  start-page: 228
  year: 2001
  end-page: 231
  ident: bib19
  article-title: Twin chorionicity and pre-eclampsia
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 39
  start-page: 69
  year: 2012
  end-page: 74
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol
– volume: 86
  start-page: 111
  year: 1979
  end-page: 118
  ident: bib26
  article-title: A study of birth weight, placental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons
  publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol
– volume: 115
  start-page: 58
  year: 2008
  end-page: 67
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study
  publication-title: BJOG
– volume: 39
  start-page: 69
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib9
  article-title: Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.10057
– volume: 198
  start-page: 428.e1
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib22
  article-title: Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: bigger placenta or relative ischemia?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.783
– volume: 87
  start-page: 541
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib32
  article-title: Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study
  publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
  doi: 10.1080/00016340802050668
– volume: 120
  start-page: 753
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib29
  article-title: Natural history of placenta previa in twins
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318269baac
– volume: 115
  start-page: 58
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib5
  article-title: Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study
  publication-title: BJOG
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x
– volume: 97
  start-page: 310
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib11
  article-title: Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
– volume: 22
  start-page: 293
  year: 2009
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib15
  article-title: Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.1080/14767050802663194
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1273
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib21
  article-title: Does risk of preeclampsia differ by twin chorionicity?
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.777701
– volume: 193
  start-page: 757
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib31
  article-title: Is zygosity or chorionicity the main determinant of fetal outcome in twin pregnancies?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.024
– volume: 95
  start-page: 899
  year: 2000
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib13
  article-title: Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/00006250-200006000-00022
– volume: 84
  start-page: 71
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib12
  article-title: Maternal complications of twin pregnancy
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00314-X
– volume: 18
  start-page: 557
  year: 2004
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib14
  article-title: Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.007
– volume: 122
  start-page: 406
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib18
  article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 137
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1
– volume: 9
  start-page: 664
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib25
  article-title: Curves of placental weights of live-born twins
  publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1375/twin.9.5.664
– volume: 186
  start-page: 579
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib2
  article-title: Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins?
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121721
– volume: 28
  start-page: 23
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib8
  article-title: Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital
  publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med
  doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.899576
– volume: 45
  start-page: 286
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib24
  article-title: Maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in twin pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia in comparison with singleton pregnancies
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1002/uog.14760
– volume: 86
  start-page: 111
  year: 1979
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib26
  article-title: A study of birth weight, placental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons
  publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10577.x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 56
  year: 1998
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib16
  article-title: The incidence of gestational diabetes in multiple pregnancy
  publication-title: Austr N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02958.x
– volume: 193
  start-page: 1670
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib7
  article-title: Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.007
– volume: 18
  start-page: 23
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib10
  article-title: Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature
  publication-title: Am J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12937
– volume: 18
  start-page: 228
  year: 2001
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib19
  article-title: Twin chorionicity and pre-eclampsia
  publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00470.x
– volume: 181
  start-page: 912
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib30
  article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70324-8
– volume: 26
  start-page: 2549
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib3
  article-title: Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study
  publication-title: Hum Reprod
  doi: 10.1093/humrep/der213
– volume: 18
  start-page: 197
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib20
  article-title: Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: incidence and outcome
  publication-title: Hypertens Pregnancy
  doi: 10.3109/10641959909016193
– volume: 96
  start-page: 98
  year: 2007
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib1
  article-title: Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome
  publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002
– volume: 208
  start-page: 393.e1
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib6
  article-title: Significance of growth discordance in appropriately grown twins
  publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.044
– volume: 16
  start-page: 901
  year: 1996
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib27
  article-title: Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights
  publication-title: Pediatr Pathol Lab Med
  doi: 10.1080/15513819609168713
– volume: 60
  start-page: 451
  year: 2012
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib23
  article-title: Circulating angiogenic factors and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with suspected preeclampsia
  publication-title: Hypertension
  doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195065
– volume: 9
  start-page: 450
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib4
  article-title: The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort
  publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet
  doi: 10.1375/twin.9.3.450
– volume: 19
  start-page: 550
  year: 1999
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib17
  article-title: Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome
  publication-title: J Perinatol
  doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200292
– volume: 8
  start-page: 100
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib28
  article-title: Pre-eclampsia and chorionicity in women with twin gestations
  publication-title: J Clin Diagn Res
SSID ssj0002292
Score 2.3537245
Snippet Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome...
Objective Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 390.e1
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Chorion - diagnostic imaging
chorionicity
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Odds Ratio
Placenta - diagnostic imaging
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Complications - etiology
pregnancy outcomes
Pregnancy Trimester, Second
Pregnancy, Twin
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
twins
Ultrasonography, Prenatal
Young Adult
Title The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0002937815005037
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0002937815005037
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986034
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1708898276
Volume 213
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEB4WBfEivl1fVPAm1TZNmvYooqyKe1LwFtI0EUXaZR9Xf7szbboivkDopSVDmulk8k0z8wXgmKeEy1kZFgZDFC5KG-rCZqHQGPoInfPcNAmyw3TwwG8exWMPLrpaGEqr9L6_9emNt_ZPzrw2z0bPz1TjG-FaJTOENERqQhXlxF6HNn369pHmwVjOOghMrX3hTJvjpV_qJ0rvEg17J50s8_3i9BP4bBahq1VY8egxOG9fcA16tlqHpTu_P74BOX71oC18DGoXoGsb0_9Wg1A7qKsA0WlD-RyMxvaJmDbw6WyKQ7eTTXi4ury_GIT-cITQpGk2DTlzOmFxmevYGSNLq7XNRVYYruMytoVzWgrm4lTSzrLjNkqJat1JbqSzXCZbsFDVld2BIEmcizCwsZHR3DCc0QXGqibjQlsEPEUf4k4rynjmcDrA4lV1KWIvijSpSJMqwovJPpzMZUYtb8avrZNO2aqrCEUfptCt_yolv5OyEz8NJypWE6Yi9cVU-iDmkp-s7c8ejzpLUDgNaW9FV7aeYU-S8sUyJtM-bLcmMh83Iw78KOG7_-x1D5bprs1s24eF6XhmDxAKTYvDxtYPYfH8-nYwfAeX6gXc
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-wwEB50haMvosdzdL32gG-HYpsmTfsooqzuuk8KvoU0TUSRdtnL_3emTRfEGwh9SjukmU4m3zQzXwBOeUq4nJVhYTBE4aK0oS5sFgqNoY_QOc9NkyA7Tgf3_OZBPKzARVcLQ2mV3ve3Pr3x1r7lzGvzbPL0RDW-Ea5VMkNIQ6QmchXWiJ2K92Dt_Ho4GC8dMmM561AwCfjamTbNSz_Xj5ThJRoCTzpc5uP16TP82axDV1uw6QFkcN6-4zas2Oo3_Lr1W-Q7kOOHD9rax6B2AXq3Kf1yNYi2g7oKEKA2rM_BZGofiWwDWxdzHL2d_YH7q8u7i0Hoz0cITZpm85AzpxMWl7mOnTGytFrbXGSF4TouY1s4p6VgLk4lbS47bqOU2Nad5EY6y2XyF3pVXdk9CJLEuQhjGxsZzQ3DSV1guGoyLrRFzFP0Ie60oownD6czLF5UlyX2rEiTijSpIryY7MP_pcykpc748umkU7bqikLRjSn07F9KyY-k7MzPxJmK1YypSL2zlj6IpeQbg_u2x3-dJSicibS9oitbL7AnSSljGZNpH3ZbE1mOmxENfpTw_R_2egLrg7vbkRpdj4cHsEF32kS3Q-jNpwt7hMhoXhx7y38Fji8IjQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+impact+of+chorionicity+on+maternal+pregnancy+outcomes&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynecology&rft.au=Carter%2C+Ebony+B.%2C+MD%2C+MPH&rft.au=Bishop%2C+Katherine+C.%2C+BS&rft.au=Goetzinger%2C+Katherine+R.%2C+MD%2C+MSCI&rft.au=Tuuli%2C+Methodius+G.%2C+MD%2C+MPH&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=390.e1&rft.epage=390.e7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2015.05.027&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0002937815005037&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0002937815005037
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00029378%2FS0002937814X00116%2Fcov150h.gif