The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes
Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differe...
Saved in:
Published in | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology Vol. 213; no. 3; pp. 390.e1 - 390.e7 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
Elsevier Inc
01.09.2015
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0002-9378 1097-6868 1097-6868 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.
This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.
Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).
There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.
This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.
Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).
There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays. Objective Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Results Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins ( P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins ( P = .01). Conclusion There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays. Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity. This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs. Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17–1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58–4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12–1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01). There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays. Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.OBJECTIVEWomen carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS); however, little is known about whether the presence of 1 vs 2 placentas confers dissimilar maternal risks. We sought to determine differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes based on chorionicity.This was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.STUDY DESIGNThis was a retrospective cohort study of all twin pregnancies at our institution undergoing routine second-trimester ultrasound for anatomic survey from 1990 through 2010. Secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Relative risks and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated. Cluster analysis was used to account for nonindependence of twin pairs.Of 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).RESULTSOf 2301 pregnancies, 1747 (75.9%) were dichorionic and 554 (24.1%) were monochorionic. Rates of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, placental abruption, placenta previa, preterm labor, and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) were not significantly different in dichorionic vs monochorionic pregnancies. Early preterm delivery less than 34 weeks (aOR, 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.86) and less than 28 weeks (aOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.58-4.20) were more likely in monochorionic twins, as was neonatal intensive care unit admission (aOR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.12-1.78). Monochorionic twins delivered earlier at a mean gestational age of 34.2 weeks vs 35.0 weeks for dichorionic twins (P < .001). Hospital length of stay was significantly longer for monochorionic twins with a mean of 13.7 days vs 10.8 days for dichorionic twins (P = .01).There are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays.CONCLUSIONThere are no significant differences in maternal outcomes by chorionicity; however, monochorionicity is associated with increased fetal risks. This information may be helpful in guiding more targeted counseling to expectant parents of twins that, although the presence of an additional placenta does not confer additional maternal risks, monochorionic infants tend to deliver earlier and require longer hospital stays. |
Author | Carter, Ebony B. Goetzinger, Katherine R. Bishop, Katherine C. Cahill, Alison G. Tuuli, Methodius G. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Ebony B. orcidid: 0000-0002-7620-4929 surname: Carter fullname: Carter, Ebony B. email: cartere@wustl.edu – sequence: 2 givenname: Katherine C. orcidid: 0000-0003-2517-8799 surname: Bishop fullname: Bishop, Katherine C. – sequence: 3 givenname: Katherine R. surname: Goetzinger fullname: Goetzinger, Katherine R. – sequence: 4 givenname: Methodius G. surname: Tuuli fullname: Tuuli, Methodius G. – sequence: 5 givenname: Alison G. surname: Cahill fullname: Cahill, Alison G. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986034$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFUcFq3DAUFCWl2aT9gR6Kj714-yTbklxKIYQ2KQR6aHoWWvkpkWtLW8ku7N9XYpNLoCk8EBIz8zQzZ-TEB4-EvKWwpUD5h3Grx3C3ZUC7LeRh4gXZUOhFzSWXJ2QDAKzuGyFPyVlKY7mynr0ip6zrJYem3ZD-9h4rN--1WapgK3MfogveGbccquCrWS8YvZ6qfcQ7r73Jr-tiwozpNXlp9ZTwzcN5Tn5-_XJ7eV3ffL_6dnlxUxvO5VK3zOqG0aHX1BojBtQa-07uTKvpQHFnrRYds5QLAUBti8Bl3zZWtEZYbEVzTt4fdfcx_F4xLWp2yeA0aY9hTYoKkLKXTPAMffcAXXczDmof3azjQT3azQB5BJgYUopoVTaql-x4idpNioIqyapRlWRVSVZBHla-wZ5QH9WfJX06kjAH9MdhVMk49AYHF9EsagjuefrnJ3QzuVyOnn7hAdMY1tJNjkAlpkD9KAWXumkH0EFTBD7-W-B_2_8CoTy6AQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_fertnstert_2015_12_131 crossref_primary_10_3109_14767058_2015_1092957 crossref_primary_10_1159_000541457 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_preghy_2021_02_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejogrb_2021_06_044 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2024_2345294 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_placenta_2015_11_010 crossref_primary_10_1097_HJH_0000000000001846 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_657862 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1821640 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1283_081X_18_89342_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2018_02_010 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2023_2240467 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tjog_2019_05_009 crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evac164 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1745_3118 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9103276 crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2023_132381 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm13092673 crossref_primary_10_1038_srep26869 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2016_1230194 crossref_primary_10_1017_thg_2016_74 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm9010183 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2017_10_040 crossref_primary_10_1111_aogs_13981 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajogmf_2021_100396 crossref_primary_10_1017_thg_2016_17 crossref_primary_10_17343_sdutfd_631022 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1945574 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diabres_2020_108623 crossref_primary_10_1111_1471_0528_16479 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/uog.10057 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.783 10.1080/00016340802050668 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318269baac 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x 10.1080/14767050802663194 10.3109/14767058.2013.777701 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.024 10.1097/00006250-200006000-00022 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00314-X 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.007 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1 10.1375/twin.9.5.664 10.1067/mob.2002.121721 10.3109/14767058.2014.899576 10.1002/uog.14760 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10577.x 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02958.x 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.007 10.1055/s-2001-12937 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00470.x 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70324-8 10.1093/humrep/der213 10.3109/10641959909016193 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.044 10.1080/15513819609168713 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195065 10.1375/twin.9.3.450 10.1038/sj.jp.7200292 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2015 Elsevier Inc. Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2015 Elsevier Inc. – notice: Elsevier Inc. – notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1097-6868 |
EndPage | 390.e7 |
ExternalDocumentID | 25986034 10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027 S0002937815005037 1_s2_0_S0002937815005037 |
Genre | Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: 5T32HD055172-05 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002 – fundername: NICHD NIH HHS grantid: 5T32HD055172-05 |
GroupedDBID | --- --K --M -ET .1- .55 .FO .GJ .XZ .~1 0R~ 1B1 1CY 1P~ 1~. 1~5 23M 2KS 354 3O- 4.4 457 4CK 4G. 53G 5GY 5RE 5VS 6J9 7-5 85S 8F7 8P~ AAEDT AAEDW AAIKC AAIKJ AAKOC AALRI AAMNW AAOAW AAQFI AAQQT AAQXK AATTM AAWTL AAXKI AAXUO AAYJJ AAYWO ABBQC ABCQX ABDPE ABFNM ABFRF ABJNI ABMAC ABMZM ABOCM ABPMR ABWVN ABXDB ACDAQ ACGFO ACGFS ACIEU ACRLP ACRPL ACVFH ADBBV ADCNI ADEZE ADMUD ADNMO ADVLN AEBSH AEFWE AEIPS AEKER AENEX AEUPX AEVXI AFCHL AFFNX AFJKZ AFPUW AFRHN AFTJW AFXIZ AGCQF AGHFR AGNAY AGQPQ AGUBO AGYEJ AHDLI AI. AIEXJ AIGII AIIUN AIKHN AITUG AJRQY AJUYK AKBMS AKRWK AKYEP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMRAJ ANKPU ANZVX APXCP ASPBG AVWKF AXJTR AZFZN BKOJK BLXMC BNPGV C45 C5W CAG COF CS3 EBS EFJIC EFKBS EJD EO8 EX3 F5P FDB FEDTE FGOYB FIRID FNPLU FYGXN G-Q GBLVA HVGLF HZ~ IH2 IHE J1W K-O KOM LPU M41 MO0 N4W N9A NEJ NQ- O-L O9- OAUVE OBH OCB OGEVE OHH OHT OMK OQ. OVD P-8 P-9 P2P PC. PH~ Q38 R2- ROL RPZ RXW SDF SEL SES SEW SJN SPCBC SSH SSZ T5K TAE TEORI TWZ UDS UGJ UHB UHS UHU UKR UNMZH UV1 VH1 VVN WH7 WOQ WOW X6Y X7M XFW YFH YOC YYQ YZZ Z5R ZGI ZXP ZY1 ~G- ~H1 AACTN AFCTW AFKWA AJOXV AMFUW NCXOZ RIG AAIAV ABLVK ABYKQ ADOJD AFDAS AHPSJ AJBFU EFLBG G8K LCYCR ZA5 AAYXX AGRNS CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c668t-42fa321d9a1fcc7deaae958bc4a1d1ebffa752f1677001f4e068943f74c7fe473 |
IEDL.DBID | .~1 |
ISSN | 0002-9378 1097-6868 |
IngestDate | Mon Jul 21 10:01:57 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:58:30 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:55:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:50:54 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 23 02:29:20 EST 2024 Sun Feb 23 10:19:22 EST 2025 Tue Aug 26 17:15:27 EDT 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Keywords | twins pregnancy outcomes chorionicity |
Language | English |
License | https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c668t-42fa321d9a1fcc7deaae958bc4a1d1ebffa752f1677001f4e068943f74c7fe473 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2517-8799 0000-0002-7620-4929 |
PMID | 25986034 |
PQID | 1708898276 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1708898276 pubmed_primary_25986034 crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027 elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027 elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S0002937815005037 elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_ajog_2015_05_027 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2015-09-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-09-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 09 year: 2015 text: 2015-09-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | United States |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Am J Obstet Gynecol |
PublicationYear | 2015 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc |
Publisher_xml | – name: Elsevier Inc |
References | Carroll, Tyfield, Reeve, Porter, Soothill, Kyle (bib31) 2005; 193 Rana, Hacker, Modest (bib23) 2012; 60 Hack, Derks, Elias (bib5) 2008; 115 Masheer, Maheen, Munim (bib8) 2015; 28 Savvidou, Karanastasi, Skentou, Geerts, Nicolaides (bib19) 2001; 18 Dubé, Dodds, Armson (bib2) 2002; 186 Campbell, Templeton (bib12) 2004; 84 Conde-Agudelo, Belizan, Lindmark (bib13) 2000; 95 Bleker, Breur, Huidekoper (bib26) 1979; 86 Gielen, Lindsey, Derom (bib25) 2006; 9 Victoria, Mora, Arias (bib11) 2001; 97 Quintero, Morales, Allen, Bornick, Johnson, Kruger (bib17) 1999; 19 Pinar, Sung, Oyer, Singer (bib27) 1996; 16 Sherer (bib10) 2001; 18 Roach, Lau, Wilson, Rogers (bib16) 1998; 38 Rao, Sairam, Shehata (bib14) 2004; 18 Glinianaia, Obeysekera, Sturgiss, Bell (bib3) 2011; 26 Lopriore, Stroeken, Sueters, Meerman, Walther, Vandenbussche (bib32) 2008; 87 Acosta-Rojas, Becker, Munoz-Abellana (bib1) 2007; 96 Leduc, Takser, Rinfret (bib7) 2005; 193 Hack, Derks, de Visser, Elias, Visser (bib4) 2006; 9 Campbell, MacGillivray (bib20) 1999; 18 Schwartz, Daoud, Zazula (bib30) 1999; 181 Bdolah, Lam, Rajakumar (bib22) 2008; 198 Weis, Harper, Roehl, Odibo, Cahill (bib29) 2012; 120 Rauh-Hain, Rana, Tamez (bib15) 2009; 22 Oldenburg, Rode, Bodker (bib9) 2012; 39 (bib18) 2013; 122 Singh, Singh, Surapaneni, Nirmalan (bib28) 2014; 8 Sparks, Cheng, Phan, Caughey (bib21) 2013; 26 Dröge, Herraìz, Zeisler (bib24) 2015; 45 Harper, Weis, Odibo, Roehl, Macones, Cahill (bib6) 2013; 208 Victoria (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib11) 2001; 97 Quintero (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib17) 1999; 19 Masheer (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib8) 2015; 28 Gielen (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib25) 2006; 9 Bleker (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib26) 1979; 86 Pinar (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib27) 1996; 16 Rao (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib14) 2004; 18 Harper (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib6) 2013; 208 Sparks (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib21) 2013; 26 Dröge (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib24) 2015; 45 Glinianaia (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib3) 2011; 26 Roach (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib16) 1998; 38 (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib18) 2013; 122 Oldenburg (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib9) 2012; 39 Schwartz (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib30) 1999; 181 Rana (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib23) 2012; 60 Campbell (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib20) 1999; 18 Savvidou (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib19) 2001; 18 Bdolah (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib22) 2008; 198 Conde-Agudelo (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib13) 2000; 95 Hack (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib4) 2006; 9 Hack (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib5) 2008; 115 Singh (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib28) 2014; 8 Acosta-Rojas (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib1) 2007; 96 Sherer (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib10) 2001; 18 Campbell (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib12) 2004; 84 Lopriore (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib32) 2008; 87 Dubé (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib2) 2002; 186 Weis (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib29) 2012; 120 Carroll (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib31) 2005; 193 Leduc (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib7) 2005; 193 Rauh-Hain (10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib15) 2009; 22 |
References_xml | – volume: 8 start-page: 100 year: 2014 end-page: 102 ident: bib28 article-title: Pre-eclampsia and chorionicity in women with twin gestations publication-title: J Clin Diagn Res – volume: 95 start-page: 899 year: 2000 end-page: 904 ident: bib13 article-title: Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 122 start-page: 406 year: 2013 end-page: 416 ident: bib18 article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 137 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 87 start-page: 541 year: 2008 end-page: 545 ident: bib32 article-title: Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand – volume: 193 start-page: 1670 year: 2005 end-page: 1675 ident: bib7 article-title: Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 60 start-page: 451 year: 2012 end-page: 458 ident: bib23 article-title: Circulating angiogenic factors and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with suspected preeclampsia publication-title: Hypertension – volume: 16 start-page: 901 year: 1996 end-page: 907 ident: bib27 article-title: Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights publication-title: Pediatr Pathol Lab Med – volume: 45 start-page: 286 year: 2015 end-page: 293 ident: bib24 article-title: Maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in twin pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia in comparison with singleton pregnancies publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 22 start-page: 293 year: 2009 end-page: 299 ident: bib15 article-title: Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 9 start-page: 450 year: 2006 end-page: 455 ident: bib4 article-title: The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet – volume: 18 start-page: 197 year: 1999 end-page: 207 ident: bib20 article-title: Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: incidence and outcome publication-title: Hypertens Pregnancy – volume: 181 start-page: 912 year: 1999 end-page: 914 ident: bib30 article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 193 start-page: 757 year: 2005 end-page: 761 ident: bib31 article-title: Is zygosity or chorionicity the main determinant of fetal outcome in twin pregnancies? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 18 start-page: 557 year: 2004 end-page: 576 ident: bib14 article-title: Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol – volume: 97 start-page: 310 year: 2001 end-page: 315 ident: bib11 article-title: Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 120 start-page: 753 year: 2012 end-page: 758 ident: bib29 article-title: Natural history of placenta previa in twins publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 84 start-page: 71 year: 2004 end-page: 73 ident: bib12 article-title: Maternal complications of twin pregnancy publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet – volume: 28 start-page: 23 year: 2015 end-page: 25 ident: bib8 article-title: Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 18 start-page: 23 year: 2001 end-page: 37 ident: bib10 article-title: Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature publication-title: Am J Perinatol – volume: 186 start-page: 579 year: 2002 end-page: 583 ident: bib2 article-title: Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 208 start-page: 393.e1 year: 2013 end-page: 393.e5 ident: bib6 article-title: Significance of growth discordance in appropriately grown twins publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 26 start-page: 1273 year: 2013 end-page: 1277 ident: bib21 article-title: Does risk of preeclampsia differ by twin chorionicity? publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med – volume: 96 start-page: 98 year: 2007 end-page: 102 ident: bib1 article-title: Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet – volume: 19 start-page: 550 year: 1999 end-page: 555 ident: bib17 article-title: Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome publication-title: J Perinatol – volume: 9 start-page: 664 year: 2006 end-page: 672 ident: bib25 article-title: Curves of placental weights of live-born twins publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet – volume: 38 start-page: 56 year: 1998 end-page: 57 ident: bib16 article-title: The incidence of gestational diabetes in multiple pregnancy publication-title: Austr N Z J Obstet Gynaecol – volume: 26 start-page: 2549 year: 2011 end-page: 2557 ident: bib3 article-title: Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study publication-title: Hum Reprod – volume: 198 start-page: 428.e1 year: 2008 end-page: 428.e6 ident: bib22 article-title: Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: bigger placenta or relative ischemia? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol – volume: 18 start-page: 228 year: 2001 end-page: 231 ident: bib19 article-title: Twin chorionicity and pre-eclampsia publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol – volume: 39 start-page: 69 year: 2012 end-page: 74 ident: bib9 article-title: Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol – volume: 86 start-page: 111 year: 1979 end-page: 118 ident: bib26 article-title: A study of birth weight, placental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol – volume: 115 start-page: 58 year: 2008 end-page: 67 ident: bib5 article-title: Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study publication-title: BJOG – volume: 39 start-page: 69 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib9 article-title: Influence of chorionicity on perinatal outcome in a large cohort of Danish twin pregnancies publication-title: Ultrasound Obstetrics Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.10057 – volume: 198 start-page: 428.e1 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib22 article-title: Twin pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: bigger placenta or relative ischemia? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.10.783 – volume: 87 start-page: 541 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib32 article-title: Term perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a retrospective study publication-title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand doi: 10.1080/00016340802050668 – volume: 120 start-page: 753 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib29 article-title: Natural history of placenta previa in twins publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318269baac – volume: 115 start-page: 58 year: 2008 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib5 article-title: Increased perinatal mortality and morbidity in monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies: clinical implications of a large Dutch cohort study publication-title: BJOG doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01556.x – volume: 97 start-page: 310 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib11 article-title: Perinatal outcome, placental pathology, and severity of discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins publication-title: Obstet Gynecol – volume: 22 start-page: 293 year: 2009 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib15 article-title: Risk for developing gestational diabetes in women with twin pregnancies publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.1080/14767050802663194 – volume: 26 start-page: 1273 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib21 article-title: Does risk of preeclampsia differ by twin chorionicity? publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.777701 – volume: 193 start-page: 757 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib31 article-title: Is zygosity or chorionicity the main determinant of fetal outcome in twin pregnancies? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.024 – volume: 95 start-page: 899 year: 2000 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib13 article-title: Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with multiple gestations publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/00006250-200006000-00022 – volume: 84 start-page: 71 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib12 article-title: Maternal complications of twin pregnancy publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00314-X – volume: 18 start-page: 557 year: 2004 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib14 article-title: Obstetric complications of twin pregnancies publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2004.04.007 – volume: 122 start-page: 406 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib18 article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 137 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000433006.09219.f1 – volume: 9 start-page: 664 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib25 article-title: Curves of placental weights of live-born twins publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet doi: 10.1375/twin.9.5.664 – volume: 186 start-page: 579 year: 2002 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib2 article-title: Does chorionicity or zygosity predict adverse perinatal outcomes in twins? publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.121721 – volume: 28 start-page: 23 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib8 article-title: Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: an observational study from tertiary care hospital publication-title: J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.899576 – volume: 45 start-page: 286 year: 2015 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib24 article-title: Maternal serum sFlt-1/PlGF ratio in twin pregnancies with and without pre-eclampsia in comparison with singleton pregnancies publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1002/uog.14760 – volume: 86 start-page: 111 year: 1979 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib26 article-title: A study of birth weight, placental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons publication-title: Br J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb10577.x – volume: 38 start-page: 56 year: 1998 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib16 article-title: The incidence of gestational diabetes in multiple pregnancy publication-title: Austr N Z J Obstet Gynaecol doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1998.tb02958.x – volume: 193 start-page: 1670 year: 2005 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib7 article-title: Persistance of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in monochorionic twins after exclusion of disorders unique to monochorionic placentation publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.04.007 – volume: 18 start-page: 23 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib10 article-title: Adverse perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies according to chorionicity: review of the literature publication-title: Am J Perinatol doi: 10.1055/s-2001-12937 – volume: 18 start-page: 228 year: 2001 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib19 article-title: Twin chorionicity and pre-eclampsia publication-title: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00470.x – volume: 181 start-page: 912 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib30 article-title: Gestational diabetes mellitus: metabolic and blood glucose parameters in singleton versus twin pregnancies publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70324-8 – volume: 26 start-page: 2549 year: 2011 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib3 article-title: Stillbirth and neonatal mortality in monochorionic and dichorionic twins: a population-based study publication-title: Hum Reprod doi: 10.1093/humrep/der213 – volume: 18 start-page: 197 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib20 article-title: Preeclampsia in twin pregnancies: incidence and outcome publication-title: Hypertens Pregnancy doi: 10.3109/10641959909016193 – volume: 96 start-page: 98 year: 2007 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib1 article-title: Twin chorionicity and the risk of adverse perinatal outcome publication-title: Int J Gynaecol Obstet doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.11.002 – volume: 208 start-page: 393.e1 year: 2013 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib6 article-title: Significance of growth discordance in appropriately grown twins publication-title: Am J Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.044 – volume: 16 start-page: 901 year: 1996 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib27 article-title: Reference values for singleton and twin placental weights publication-title: Pediatr Pathol Lab Med doi: 10.1080/15513819609168713 – volume: 60 start-page: 451 year: 2012 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib23 article-title: Circulating angiogenic factors and risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies with suspected preeclampsia publication-title: Hypertension doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.112.195065 – volume: 9 start-page: 450 year: 2006 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib4 article-title: The natural course of monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies: a historical cohort publication-title: Twin Res Hum Genet doi: 10.1375/twin.9.3.450 – volume: 19 start-page: 550 year: 1999 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib17 article-title: Staging of twin-twin transfusion syndrome publication-title: J Perinatol doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7200292 – volume: 8 start-page: 100 year: 2014 ident: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027_bib28 article-title: Pre-eclampsia and chorionicity in women with twin gestations publication-title: J Clin Diagn Res |
SSID | ssj0002292 |
Score | 2.3537245 |
Snippet | Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion syndrome... Objective Women carrying twin pregnancies often receive similar counseling, regardless of chorionicity, with the notable exception of twin-twin transfusion... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed crossref elsevier |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 390.e1 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Chorion - diagnostic imaging chorionicity Cohort Studies Female Humans Infant, Newborn Infant, Newborn, Diseases - etiology Obstetrics and Gynecology Odds Ratio Placenta - diagnostic imaging Pregnancy Pregnancy Complications - etiology pregnancy outcomes Pregnancy Trimester, Second Pregnancy, Twin Retrospective Studies Risk Factors twins Ultrasonography, Prenatal Young Adult |
Title | The impact of chorionicity on maternal pregnancy outcomes |
URI | https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S0002937815005037 https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S0002937815005037 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.05.027 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25986034 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1708898276 |
Volume | 213 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LS8QwEB4WBfEivl1fVPAm1TZNmvYooqyKe1LwFtI0EUXaZR9Xf7szbboivkDopSVDmulk8k0z8wXgmKeEy1kZFgZDFC5KG-rCZqHQGPoInfPcNAmyw3TwwG8exWMPLrpaGEqr9L6_9emNt_ZPzrw2z0bPz1TjG-FaJTOENERqQhXlxF6HNn369pHmwVjOOghMrX3hTJvjpV_qJ0rvEg17J50s8_3i9BP4bBahq1VY8egxOG9fcA16tlqHpTu_P74BOX71oC18DGoXoGsb0_9Wg1A7qKsA0WlD-RyMxvaJmDbw6WyKQ7eTTXi4ury_GIT-cITQpGk2DTlzOmFxmevYGSNLq7XNRVYYruMytoVzWgrm4lTSzrLjNkqJat1JbqSzXCZbsFDVld2BIEmcizCwsZHR3DCc0QXGqibjQlsEPEUf4k4rynjmcDrA4lV1KWIvijSpSJMqwovJPpzMZUYtb8avrZNO2aqrCEUfptCt_yolv5OyEz8NJypWE6Yi9cVU-iDmkp-s7c8ejzpLUDgNaW9FV7aeYU-S8sUyJtM-bLcmMh83Iw78KOG7_-x1D5bprs1s24eF6XhmDxAKTYvDxtYPYfH8-nYwfAeX6gXc |
linkProvider | Elsevier |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1bS-wwEB50haMvosdzdL32gG-HYpsmTfsooqzuuk8KvoU0TUSRdtnL_3emTRfEGwh9SjukmU4m3zQzXwBOeUq4nJVhYTBE4aK0oS5sFgqNoY_QOc9NkyA7Tgf3_OZBPKzARVcLQ2mV3ve3Pr3x1r7lzGvzbPL0RDW-Ea5VMkNIQ6QmchXWiJ2K92Dt_Ho4GC8dMmM561AwCfjamTbNSz_Xj5ThJRoCTzpc5uP16TP82axDV1uw6QFkcN6-4zas2Oo3_Lr1W-Q7kOOHD9rax6B2AXq3Kf1yNYi2g7oKEKA2rM_BZGofiWwDWxdzHL2d_YH7q8u7i0Hoz0cITZpm85AzpxMWl7mOnTGytFrbXGSF4TouY1s4p6VgLk4lbS47bqOU2Nad5EY6y2XyF3pVXdk9CJLEuQhjGxsZzQ3DSV1guGoyLrRFzFP0Ie60oownD6czLF5UlyX2rEiTijSpIryY7MP_pcykpc748umkU7bqikLRjSn07F9KyY-k7MzPxJmK1YypSL2zlj6IpeQbg_u2x3-dJSicibS9oitbL7AnSSljGZNpH3ZbE1mOmxENfpTw_R_2egLrg7vbkRpdj4cHsEF32kS3Q-jNpwt7hMhoXhx7y38Fji8IjQ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+impact+of+chorionicity+on+maternal+pregnancy+outcomes&rft.jtitle=American+journal+of+obstetrics+and+gynecology&rft.au=Carter%2C+Ebony+B.%2C+MD%2C+MPH&rft.au=Bishop%2C+Katherine+C.%2C+BS&rft.au=Goetzinger%2C+Katherine+R.%2C+MD%2C+MSCI&rft.au=Tuuli%2C+Methodius+G.%2C+MD%2C+MPH&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.volume=213&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=390.e1&rft.epage=390.e7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.ajog.2015.05.027&rft.externalDBID=ECK1-s2.0-S0002937815005037&rft.externalDocID=1_s2_0_S0002937815005037 |
thumbnail_m | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F00029378%2FS0002937814X00116%2Fcov150h.gif |