rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing
Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC microbiology Vol. 19; no. 1; pp. 171 - 16 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
29.07.2019
BioMed Central BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene.
We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii.
Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Background Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Results We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii. Conclusions Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. Keywords: rpoB, 16S rRNA gene, Metabarcoding, Mock communities, Entomopathogenic nematodes Abstract Background Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. Results We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii. Conclusions Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii. Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene. We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii. Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. BackgroundMicrobiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene.ResultsWe first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (<50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii.ConclusionsOur results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene.BACKGROUNDMicrobiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene are classically used to estimate bacterial diversity, but other universal bacterial markers with a finer taxonomic resolution could be employed. We compared specificity and sensitivity between a portion of the rpoB gene and the V3 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene.We first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii.RESULTSWe first designed universal primers for rpoB suitable for use with Illumina sequencing-based technology and constructed a reference rpoB database of 45,000 sequences. The rpoB and V3 V4 markers were amplified and sequenced from (i) a mock community of 19 bacterial strains from both Gram-negative and Gram-positive lineages; (ii) bacterial assemblages associated with entomopathogenic nematodes. In metabarcoding analyses of mock communities with two analytical pipelines (FROGS and DADA2), the estimated diversity captured with the rpoB marker resembled the expected composition of these mock communities more closely than that captured with V3 V4. The rpoB marker had a higher level of taxonomic affiliation, a higher sensitivity (detection of all the species present in the mock communities), and a higher specificity (low rates of spurious OTU detection) than V3 V4. We compared the performance of the rpoB and V3 V4 markers in an animal ecosystem model, the infective juveniles of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema glaseri carrying the symbiotic bacteria Xenorhabdus poinarii. Both markers showed the bacterial community associated with this nematode to be of low diversity (< 50 OTUs), but only rpoB reliably detected the symbiotic bacterium X. poinarii.Our results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems.CONCLUSIONSOur results confirm that different microbiota composition data may be obtained with different markers. We found that rpoB was a highly appropriate marker for assessing the taxonomic structure of mock communities and the nematode microbiota. Further studies on other ecosystems should be considered to evaluate the universal usefulness of the rpoB marker. Our data highlight two crucial elements that should be taken into account to ensure more reliable and accurate descriptions of microbial diversity in high-throughput amplicon sequencing analyses: i) the need to include mock communities as controls; ii) the advantages of using a multigenic approach including at least one housekeeping gene (rpoB is a good candidate) and one variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. This study will be useful to the growing scientific community describing bacterial communities by metabarcoding in diverse ecosystems. |
| ArticleNumber | 171 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Ogier, Jean-Claude Pagès, Sylvie Barret, Matthieu Galan, Maxime Gaudriault, Sophie |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jean-Claude orcidid: 0000-0002-5439-694X surname: Ogier fullname: Ogier, Jean-Claude – sequence: 2 givenname: Sylvie surname: Pagès fullname: Pagès, Sylvie – sequence: 3 givenname: Maxime surname: Galan fullname: Galan, Maxime – sequence: 4 givenname: Matthieu surname: Barret fullname: Barret, Matthieu – sequence: 5 givenname: Sophie surname: Gaudriault fullname: Gaudriault, Sophie |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02627663$$DView record in HAL |
| BookMark | eNp1Ul1rFDEUHaRiP_QH-CIBXyw4NR-zSeZFWIvahYLgx3PIZO7sps4k2yS7uPvrzTitdIsSQsLNOSece89pceS8g6J4SfAFIZK_i4RKzktM6pLMKl7unxQnpBKkpETiowf34-I0xhuMiZBMPCuOGWEzUVN5UrRh7T-8RRqtgx9stG6JBh1-QkCdD0g73e_2YzGtALV2CyHatEO-Q402CYLVPTJ-GDbOJgsRNTukh3VvjXcowu0GnMns58XTTvcRXtydZ8WPTx-_X16V118-Ly7n16XhnKeSMmm4YBobaVpd8a4DRjmpNRc67xq6WleS0k6YlmGiOw1Qt6SBmra8rhk7KxaTbuv1jVoHm63slNdW_Sn4sFQ6JGt6UNRUBCgGxkhbNdg0jaxYa6qK1NIYLLLW-0lrvWkGaA24FHR_IHr44uxKLf1WZSuVELMscD4JrB7RrubXaqxhyqngnG1Jxr65-yz43LSYVJ6Fgb7XDvwmKkq5yMMTdPT4eoIudbZhXefz72aEq_ms5jPJseQZdfEPVF4tDONwoLO5fkA4PyBkTIJfaak3MarFt6-H2FcPW_PX3H2qMkBMABN8jAE6ZWzSyfqxU7ZXBKsxv2rKr8r5VWN-1T4zySPmvfj_Ob8BWGXyBA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_22207_JPAM_16_1_48 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13568_022_01477_9 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcell_2021_719072 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_727022 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms9091842 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms222112005 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11033_022_08015_7 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_food_052720_010751 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms9040697 crossref_primary_10_1093_gbe_evab127 crossref_primary_10_1111_1755_0998_13444 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_763359 crossref_primary_10_1111_1758_2229_13049 crossref_primary_10_1128_jcm_00266_24 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13213_024_01767_6 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_025_57088_y crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_69292_5 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_023_08518_z crossref_primary_10_1128_mbio_03175_21 crossref_primary_10_1080_09593330_2024_2394719 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgeb_2025_100483 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_estlett_0c00974 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_022_01295_y crossref_primary_10_1099_mgen_0_000624 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2024_177439 crossref_primary_10_5252_cryptogamie_algologie2023v44a3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_molcel_2023_05_013 crossref_primary_10_1093_ismeco_ycaf024 crossref_primary_10_1094_PDIS_05_23_0889_PDN crossref_primary_10_1099_mic_0_001256 crossref_primary_10_6000_1927_520X_2024_13_17 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2019_02910 crossref_primary_10_1080_02648725_2023_2197717 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jafc_3c06874 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_53348_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jare_2023_06_011 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_02113_24 crossref_primary_10_24072_pcjournal_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11274_021_03019_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2023_109275 crossref_primary_10_1002_imt2_82 crossref_primary_10_3390_jmse11101981 crossref_primary_10_1002_smll_202205687 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00203_021_02738_0 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2021_666689 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_nbt_2024_06_007 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2024_1415723 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_023_43549_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_femsec_fiaa009 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms242115692 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tim_2023_01_004 crossref_primary_10_1128_msphere_00360_24 crossref_primary_10_1002_wer_70044 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_heliyon_2024_e31559 crossref_primary_10_1094_PHYTOFR_01_23_0002_R crossref_primary_10_1128_msphere_00765_24 crossref_primary_10_1128_msphere_00439_24 crossref_primary_10_1128_jvi_01731_23 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_889788 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mimet_2024_106984 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsestengg_4c00361 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_00871_23 crossref_primary_10_1002_mbo3_1276 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1007877 crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms8020308 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00203_022_03064_9 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_3c05905 crossref_primary_10_1093_molbev_msaa273 crossref_primary_10_1093_ismeco_ycae034 crossref_primary_10_1002_smll_202207136 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_analchem_3c01654 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijfoodmicro_2022_109613 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmb_2020_07_001 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1031535 crossref_primary_10_1039_D4EN00548A crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00753_24 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_022_01449_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00792_024_01358_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mimet_2021_106350 crossref_primary_10_1094_PDIS_05_24_1103_PDN crossref_primary_10_1016_j_micinf_2024_105462 crossref_primary_10_30699_ijmm_14_5_425 crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_01_74 crossref_primary_10_21931_RB_CSS_2023_08_01_73 |
| Cites_doi | 10.7717/peerj.2584 10.1093/nar/gku1341 10.1126/science.aaf3951 10.1093/gbe/evu119 10.1128/AEM.01177-06 10.1371/journal.pone.0204629 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 10.1099/ijs.0.65440-0 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 10.4161/rna.28306 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791 10.1371/journal.pone.0049755 10.1093/molbev/msw054 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0094249 10.1017/S0031182000070980 10.1163/187529275X00419 10.1128/JCM.02058-07 10.1093/nar/gkr1044 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x 10.1016/j.mib.2012.04.006 10.1038/nmeth.2604 10.1128/AEM.03006-05 10.1099/ijs.0.64287-0 10.1128/JB.188.2.809-814.2006 10.1016/j.tim.2008.09.008 10.1371/journal.pone.0030600 10.1128/mSystems.00023-18 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 10.1093/nar/gkl889 10.1093/nar/gks1219 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01190.x 10.7717/peerj.593 10.1128/AEM.01451-14 10.1128/AEM.03722-14 10.1128/AEM.02953-09 10.1002/wics.147 10.1016/S0723-2020(86)80162-X 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1333-1338.2002 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459 10.1038/nmeth.3869 10.3390/insects9030117 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. Attribution The Author(s). 2019 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2019 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: Attribution – notice: The Author(s). 2019 |
| DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM ISR 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12866-019-1546-z |
| DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed Gale In Context: Science MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Biology Environmental Sciences |
| EISSN | 1471-2180 |
| EndPage | 16 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_2c41e20e331d4b0cbb843dc44198cc07 PMC6664775 oai_HAL_hal_02627663v1 A596586086 31357928 10_1186_s12866_019_1546_z |
| Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | France |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: France |
| GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: ; – fundername: ; grantid: P10016 |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ A8Z AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LK5 LK8 M1P M48 M7P M7R MM. M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~02 -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ AGJBV C24 NPM PMFND 7X8 PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB 1XC 2VQ 4.4 AHSBF C1A H13 IPNFZ RIG VOOES 5PM PUEGO |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c666t-238c673a0c8cda46ffe32619a67aa679ef9a4822f7cd301afaee9d1be92d69933 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2180 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:30:35 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:31:27 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 07:04:07 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 11:11:34 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:51:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:25:47 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:30:22 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:30:17 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:04:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:31:31 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Metabarcoding Mock communities Entomopathogenic nematodes rpoB 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding mock communities entomopathogenic nematodes |
| Language | English |
| License | Attribution: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c666t-238c673a0c8cda46ffe32619a67aa679ef9a4822f7cd301afaee9d1be92d69933 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-5439-694X 0000-0003-2789-4959 0000-0002-7633-8476 0000-0001-6981-5732 0000-0002-4353-2424 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12866-019-1546-z |
| PMID | 31357928 |
| PQID | 2267017723 |
| PQPubID | 23479 |
| PageCount | 16 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_2c41e20e331d4b0cbb843dc44198cc07 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6664775 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02627663v1 proquest_miscellaneous_2267017723 gale_infotracmisc_A596586086 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A596586086 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A596586086 pubmed_primary_31357928 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12866_019_1546_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_019_1546_z |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2019-07-29 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2019-07-29 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2019 text: 2019-07-29 day: 29 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | England |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | BMC microbiology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Microbiol |
| PublicationYear | 2019 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
| References | M Barret (1546_CR9) 2015; 81 JC Ogier (1546_CR22) 2014; 6 JR Cole (1546_CR43) 2007; 35 Benjamin J Callahan (1546_CR39) 2016; 13 M Drancourt (1546_CR17) 2002; 40 F Mahe (1546_CR40) 2014; 2 TZ DeSantis (1546_CR1) 2006; 72 N Boemare (1546_CR32) 1997; 22 J Jovel (1546_CR23) 2016; 7 T Magoc (1546_CR36) 2011; 27 P Dixon (1546_CR45) 2003; 14 T Adekambi (1546_CR15) 2009; 17 S Poirier (1546_CR8) 2018; 13 RJ Case (1546_CR11) 2007; 73 1546_CR24 V Kunin (1546_CR29) 2010; 12 B Ghebremedhin (1546_CR13) 2008; 46 PD Schloss (1546_CR6) 2011; 6 C Nielsen-LeRoux (1546_CR20) 2012; 15 RC Edgar (1546_CR41) 2011; 27 JR Cole (1546_CR2) 2014; 11 C Quast (1546_CR3) 2013; 41 AH Moeller (1546_CR10) 2016; 353 H Wickham (1546_CR46) 2011; 3 C Mollet (1546_CR18) 1997; 26 MC Nelson (1546_CR28) 2014; 9 P Tailliez (1546_CR33) 2006; 56 PJ McMurdie (1546_CR44) 2013; 8 RJ Akhurst (1546_CR21) 1986; 8 M Schirmer (1546_CR4) 2015; 43 T Adekambi (1546_CR16) 2008; 58 S Gaudriault (1546_CR34) 2006; 188 VM Markowitz (1546_CR37) 2012; 40 GO Poinar Jr (1546_CR31) 1966; 56 A Krohn (1546_CR25) 2016; 4 T Rognes (1546_CR42) 2016; 4 F Escudie (1546_CR38) 2018; 34 RC Edgar (1546_CR27) 2013; 10 S Kumar (1546_CR47) 2016; 33 S Roux (1546_CR7) 2011; 78 M Vos (1546_CR12) 2012; 7 MG Links (1546_CR14) 2012; 7 MF Brivio (1546_CR19) 2018; 9 1546_CR35 AY Pei (1546_CR26) 2010; 76 K Kennedy (1546_CR5) 2014; 80 RA Bedding (1546_CR30) 1975; 21 |
| References_xml | – volume: 4 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR42 publication-title: PeerJ. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2584 – volume: 43 year: 2015 ident: 1546_CR4 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1341 – volume: 353 start-page: 380 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR10 publication-title: Science. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3951 – volume: 6 start-page: 1495 year: 2014 ident: 1546_CR22 publication-title: Genome Biol Evol doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu119 – volume: 73 start-page: 278 year: 2007 ident: 1546_CR11 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.01177-06 – volume: 13 year: 2018 ident: 1546_CR8 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204629 – volume: 27 start-page: 2957 year: 2011 ident: 1546_CR36 publication-title: Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 – volume: 58 start-page: 1807 year: 2008 ident: 1546_CR16 publication-title: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65440-0 – volume: 27 start-page: 2194 year: 2011 ident: 1546_CR41 publication-title: Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 – volume: 8 year: 2013 ident: 1546_CR44 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 – volume: 11 start-page: 239 year: 2014 ident: 1546_CR2 publication-title: RNA Biol doi: 10.4161/rna.28306 – volume: 12 start-page: 118 year: 2010 ident: 1546_CR29 publication-title: Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02051.x – volume: 34 start-page: 1287 year: 2018 ident: 1546_CR38 publication-title: Bioinformatics. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx791 – volume: 7 year: 2012 ident: 1546_CR14 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049755 – volume: 33 start-page: 1870 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR47 publication-title: Mol Biol Evol doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054 – volume: 26 start-page: 1005 year: 1997 ident: 1546_CR18 publication-title: Mol Microbiol doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.6382009.x – volume: 9 year: 2014 ident: 1546_CR28 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094249 – volume: 56 start-page: 385 year: 1966 ident: 1546_CR31 publication-title: Parasitology. doi: 10.1017/S0031182000070980 – volume: 21 start-page: 109 year: 1975 ident: 1546_CR30 publication-title: Nematologica. doi: 10.1163/187529275X00419 – volume: 46 start-page: 1019 year: 2008 ident: 1546_CR13 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.02058-07 – volume: 4 start-page: e2196v3 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR25 publication-title: PeerJ Preprints – volume: 22 start-page: 167 year: 1997 ident: 1546_CR32 publication-title: Symbiosis. – volume: 40 start-page: D115 year: 2012 ident: 1546_CR37 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1044 – volume: 14 start-page: 927 year: 2003 ident: 1546_CR45 publication-title: J Vegetation Science doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x – volume: 15 start-page: 220 year: 2012 ident: 1546_CR20 publication-title: Curr Opin Microbiol doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2012.04.006 – volume: 10 start-page: 996 issue: 10 year: 2013 ident: 1546_CR27 publication-title: Nat Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2604 – volume: 72 start-page: 5069 year: 2006 ident: 1546_CR1 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05 – volume: 56 start-page: 2805 year: 2006 ident: 1546_CR33 publication-title: Int J Syst Evol Microbiol doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64287-0 – volume: 188 start-page: 809 year: 2006 ident: 1546_CR34 publication-title: J Bacteriol doi: 10.1128/JB.188.2.809-814.2006 – volume: 17 start-page: 37 year: 2009 ident: 1546_CR15 publication-title: Trends Microbiol doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2008.09.008 – volume: 7 year: 2012 ident: 1546_CR12 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030600 – ident: 1546_CR24 doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00023-18 – volume: 6 year: 2011 ident: 1546_CR6 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027310 – volume: 35 start-page: D169 year: 2007 ident: 1546_CR43 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl889 – volume: 41 start-page: D590 year: 2013 ident: 1546_CR3 publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219 – volume: 78 start-page: 617 year: 2011 ident: 1546_CR7 publication-title: FEMS Microbiol Ecol doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01190.x – volume: 2 year: 2014 ident: 1546_CR40 publication-title: PeerJ. doi: 10.7717/peerj.593 – ident: 1546_CR35 – volume: 80 start-page: 5717 year: 2014 ident: 1546_CR5 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.01451-14 – volume: 81 start-page: 1257 year: 2015 ident: 1546_CR9 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.03722-14 – volume: 76 start-page: 3886 year: 2010 ident: 1546_CR26 publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol doi: 10.1128/AEM.02953-09 – volume: 3 start-page: 180 year: 2011 ident: 1546_CR46 publication-title: Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Computational Statistics doi: 10.1002/wics.147 – volume: 8 start-page: 142 year: 1986 ident: 1546_CR21 publication-title: Syst Appl Microbiol doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(86)80162-X – volume: 40 start-page: 1333 year: 2002 ident: 1546_CR17 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1333-1338.2002 – volume: 7 start-page: 459 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR23 publication-title: Front Microbiol doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00459 – volume: 13 start-page: 581 issue: 7 year: 2016 ident: 1546_CR39 publication-title: Nature Methods doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869 – volume: 9 start-page: 117 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 1546_CR19 publication-title: Insects. doi: 10.3390/insects9030117 |
| SSID | ssj0017837 |
| Score | 2.5649235 |
| Snippet | Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding). Various... Background Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding).... BackgroundMicrobiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers (metabarcoding).... Abstract Background Microbiome composition is frequently studied by the amplification and high-throughput sequencing of specific molecular markers... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
| StartPage | 171 |
| SubjectTerms | 16S rRNA gene Analysis Bacteria Bacterial genetics Biodiversity and Ecology DNA sequencing Ecosystems Entomopathogenic nematodes Environmental Sciences Genes Genetic aspects Genetic markers Metabarcoding Methodology Microbial colonies Microbiota (Symbiotic organisms) Mock communities RNA Roundworms rpoB Technology |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1ba9RAFB60IPgi3o3WMhZBEIcmM7NzedwWyyrqg1ro2zCZSytoUvYidH-95yTZpbFQXyTkZXJmNjvnJOc75JtvCHktA2AI6zPzOZZMBiGY4VkzaUMycPDYSQp9_qJmJ_Lj6eT0ylZfyAnr5YH7iTvgQVaJl0mIKsq6DHVtpIgBsrg1IfTryCHnbYqp4fuBhrpr-IZZGXWwgLewwsrZMoAMiq1HWagT69--km-fIyPyOtz8mzV5JQ0d3yf3BvxIp_19PyC3UvOQ3Ol3lLx8ROL8oj18Rz2FgcGDkJfoLyTgzCmAU-pRgWSNjQD7aNxQMmibad2rNsPQoV8ygkKrtL6kvqOctw0dSNfQ-zE5OX7__WjGho0UWIDqZMkgLQelhS-DCdFLlXMSWDl5pT2cNmXrJSCFrEOEB95nn5KNVZ0sjwoAjHhCdpq2Sc8Ijcr4nKCGq1BoTpZGJuhnDSJP7-tYkHIzsS4MKuO42cVP11UbRrneFw584dAXbl2Qt9suF73Exk3Gh-itrSGqY3cNEDNuiBn3r5gpyD762qH-RYMEmzO_Wizch29f3XSCajgKCr2CvBmMcgv_IPhhvQLMA0pmjSx3R5bg3jC6vA8hNbrj2fSTwzYogLkGzPe7KsirTcQ57I_Utya1q4UDfKwhoDUXBXnaR-B2LFGJibbcFESPYnP0Y-MrzY_zTkQcAkNqPXn-P-bzBbnLy24xHON2l-ws56v0ErDast7rHss_-bg7gQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals |
| Title | rpoB, a promising marker for analyzing the diversity of bacterial communities by amplicon sequencing |
| URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357928 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2267017723 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02627663 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6664775 https://doaj.org/article/2c41e20e331d4b0cbb843dc44198cc07 |
| Volume | 19 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9MwELfWTUi8IL4JjMpMSEiIsHy4tvOAUIs2FcQmVKhU8WI5_tiQRjLSFtH-9dwlaSEwTVX74Jzd1Hf2_a45_46Q58wAhsi0D7W3UchMmoYy8SJkmXESXomtKYVOTvl4yj7MBrMdsilv1U7g_MrQDutJTauL179-rN7Cgn9TL3jJD-ewx3KMi7MQAAEP1z2yB45J4Do9YX8eKghZU2jGsB-H4Nk2DzmvHKLjpmo2_-2e3TvHlMn_8ei_aZV_-anj2-RWCzDpsLGIO2THFXfJjabk5OoesdVlOXpFNYWBQcXguOh3zNCpKKBXqpGiZI2NgAup3eRs0NLTvKF1hqFNc6YEmVhpvqK6zkkvC9pmZUPv-2R6fPTl3ThsKy2EBsKXRQh-23CR6shIYzXj3rsUQyvNhYZ35nymGUAJL4yFHUF77Vxm49xlieWAcNIHZLcoC_eIUMul9g6CvBiZ6FgkmYN-mURoqnVuAxJtJlaZloYcq2FcqDockVw1ulCgC4W6UOuAvNx2uWw4OK4THqG2toJIn103lNWZalejSgyLXRK5NI0tyyOT55Kl1gA0zKQxkQjIAepaIUFGgRk4Z3o5n6v3nydqOEC6HA6RYEBetEK-hF9gdHugAeYBObU6kvsdSVCv6Vw-AJPq3PF4-FFhG0TIiQBQ-DMOyLONxSnsj7lxhSuXcwUAWoBxiyQNyMPGArdjpXE6EFkiAyI6ttn5su6V4tt5zTIOhsGEGDy-_t6fkJtJVJ-DC5Nsn-wuqqV7CjBtkfdJT8xEn-yNjk4_Tfr1nx39ekHC52T09TdcRzx9 |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=rpoB%2C+a+promising+marker+for+analyzing+the+diversity+of+bacterial+communities+by+amplicon+sequencing&rft.jtitle=BMC+microbiology&rft.au=Ogier%2C+Jean-Claude&rft.au=Pag%C3%A8s%2C+Sylvie&rft.au=Galan%2C+Maxime&rft.au=Barret%2C+Matthieu&rft.date=2019-07-29&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2180&rft.eissn=1471-2180&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12866-019-1546-z&rft.externalDocID=A596586086 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2180&client=summon |