Affirmative Action and the Occupational Advancement of Minorities and Women During 1973-2003

The share of minorities and women comprising high‐paying skilled occupations such as management, professional, and technical occupations has been increasing since the 1960s, while the proportion of white men in such occupations has been declining. What has been the contribution of affirmative action...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inIndustrial relations (Berkeley) Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 213 - 246
Main Author KURTULUS, FIDAN ANA
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.04.2012
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The share of minorities and women comprising high‐paying skilled occupations such as management, professional, and technical occupations has been increasing since the 1960s, while the proportion of white men in such occupations has been declining. What has been the contribution of affirmative action to the occupational advancement of minorities and women from low‐wage unskilled occupations into high‐wage skilled ones in U.S. firms? I examine this by comparing the occupational position of minorities and women at firms holding federal contracts, and thereby mandated to implement affirmative action, and noncontracting firms, over the course of 31 years during 1973–2003. I use a new longitudinal dataset of over 100,000 large private‐sector firms across all industries and regions uniquely suited for the exploration of this question obtained from the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. My key findings show that the share of minorities and women in high‐paying skilled occupations grew more at federal contractors subject to affirmative action obligation than at noncontracting firms during the three decades under study, but these advances took place primarily during the pre‐ and early Reagan years and during the decade following the Glass Ceiling Act of 1991.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-JTCMM816-Z
istex:22E62814D0B527BA2E681128010E0A5AF58587E4
ArticleID:IREL675
The author thanks the editor and two anonymous referees, as well as Sami Alpanda, Michael Ash, Lee Badgett, Fran Blau, Jed DeVaro, Ron Ehrenberg, Nancy Folbre, Richard Freeman, Ira Gang, Doug Kruse, Ron Oaxaca, Lisa Saunders, Wayne Vroman, Tom Weisskopf, Stephen Woodbury, Myeong‐Su Yun, and session participants at the 2012 Annual Meetings of the Allied Social Sciences Associations for insightful comments and suggestions.
The author’s affiliation is Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. E‐mail
fidan@econs.umass.edu
.
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0019-8676
1468-232X
DOI:10.1111/j.1468-232X.2012.00675.x