Assessment of Adaptive Rate Response Provided by Accelerometer, Minute Ventilation and Dual Sensor Compared with Normal Sinus Rhythm During Exercise： A Self-controlled Study in Chronotropically Competent Subjects
Background：Dual sensor （DS） for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS （accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]） and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods：This self-controll...
Saved in:
| Published in | Chinese medical journal Vol. 128; no. 1; pp. 25 - 31 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
China
Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd
01.01.2015
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China%Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Wolters Kluwer |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background：Dual sensor （DS） for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS （accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]） and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing.
Methods：This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant.Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit.Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode.For these patients,sensor response factors were left at default settings （ACC =8,MV =3） and sensor indicated rates （SIRs） for DS,ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories,along with measured sinus node （SN） rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test,and compared among study groups.Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis,as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs,were used for statistical analysis.
Results：Fifteen patients （15/2 l） were determined to be chronotropically competent.The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor （mean difference between SIR and SN rate：ACC vs.SN,MV vs.SN,DS vs.SN,respectively,34.84,17.60,16.15 beats/min）,though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor （ACC vs.SN P-adjusted 〈 0.001; MV vs.SN P-adjusted =0.002; DS vs.SN P-adjusted =0.005）.However,both in the range of 1st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise,only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates （P-adjusted =0.09,0.90,respectively）.
Conclusions：The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors （ACC or MV sensor）.Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing.BACKGROUNDDual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing.This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis.METHODSThis self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis.Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1 st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively).RESULTSFifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1 st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively).The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS.CONCLUSIONSThe DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. Background: Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods: This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis. Results: Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1 st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively). Conclusions: The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. Background:Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing.Methods:This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant.Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit.Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode.For these patients,sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC =8,MV =3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS,ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories,along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test,and compared among study groups.Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis,as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs,were used for statistical analysis.Results:Fifteen patients (15/2 l) were determined to be chronotropically competent.The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate:ACC vs.SN,MV vs.SN,DS vs.SN,respectively,34.84,17.60,16.15 beats/min),though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs.SN P-adjusted ＜ 0.001; MV vs.SN P-adjusted =0.002; DS vs.SN P-adjusted =0.005).However,both in the range of 1st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise,only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted =0.09,0.90,respectively).Conclusions:The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor).Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis. Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1 st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively). The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. Background: Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]) and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods: This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant. Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit. Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode. For these patients, sensor response factors were left at default settings (ACC = 8, MV = 3) and sensor indicated rates (SIRs) for DS, ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories, along with measured sinus node (SN) rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test, and compared among study groups. Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis, as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs, were used for statistical analysis. Results: Fifteen patients (15/21) were determined to be chronotropically competent. The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor (mean difference between SIR and SN rate: ACC vs. SN, MV vs. SN, DS vs. SN, respectively, 34.84, 17.60, 16.15 beats/min), though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor (ACC vs. SN P-adjusted < 0.001; MV vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.002; DS vs. SN P-adjusted = 0.005). However, both in the range of 1 st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise, only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates (P-adjusted = 0.09, 0.90, respectively). Conclusions: The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors (ACC or MV sensor). Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. Background：Dual sensor （DS） for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS （accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]） and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods：This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant.Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit.Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode.For these patients,sensor response factors were left at default settings （ACC =8,MV =3） and sensor indicated rates （SIRs） for DS,ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories,along with measured sinus node （SN） rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test,and compared among study groups.Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis,as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs,were used for statistical analysis. Results：Fifteen patients （15/2 l） were determined to be chronotropically competent.The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor （mean difference between SIR and SN rate：ACC vs.SN,MV vs.SN,DS vs.SN,respectively,34.84,17.60,16.15 beats/min）,though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor （ACC vs.SN P-adjusted 〈 0.001; MV vs.SN P-adjusted =0.002; DS vs.SN P-adjusted =0.005）.However,both in the range of 1st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise,only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates （P-adjusted =0.09,0.90,respectively）. Conclusions：The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors （ACC or MV sensor）.Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Yuanyuan Cao Yiqun Zhang Yangang Su Jin Bai Wei Wang Junbo Ge |
| AuthorAffiliation | Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China |
| AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China%Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China – name: 2 Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China – name: 1 Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yuanyuan surname: Cao fullname: Cao, Yuanyuan organization: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032 – sequence: 2 givenname: Yiqun surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Yiqun organization: Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032 – sequence: 3 givenname: Yangang surname: Su fullname: Su, Yangang organization: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032 – sequence: 4 givenname: Jin surname: Bai fullname: Bai, Jin organization: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032 – sequence: 5 givenname: Wei surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Wei organization: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032 – sequence: 6 givenname: Junbo surname: Ge fullname: Ge, Junbo organization: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032 |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563309$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9U8tu1DAUjVARfcCeFbJAqlgwxXk5yQZpNBSoVB5qga3lODcTTx17aicdhk_hW_gOfoNf4KYzHToVQpFiyT7n3OfZD3aMNRAEj0N6lIQ0fkljxkasKIqjMMmyIr8X7EVpEo1SloQ7wd7meTfY935GaZSmGXsQ7OLJ4pgWe8GvsffgfQumI7Ym40rMO3UF5Ex0-AM_t8YD-eTslaqgIuWSjKUEDc620IF7Qd4r0yP0KwooLTplDRGmIq97ock5GG8dmdh2LhyyF6pryAfr2uENeZ6cNcuuaRHtlJmS42_gpPLw--cPMka2rkfSms5ZrZF93vXVkihDJo2zxuL1XEmh9fI6AGaDJZz35Qxk5x8G92uhPTxanwfBlzfHnyfvRqcf355MxqcjyVgEI5kCzRLGsF-RoGmSpjGkdV7ntKpFBlJAGdFI1lGYM5ZDyTLB0jqWMWTY1UjEB8HJSreyYsbnTrXCLbkVil9fWDflwnVKauBJDiLJ47DKqUxkXQkIZZJULE9LWWa0RK1XK615X7ZQSazHCb0luv1iVMOn9gqV4ywPUxQ4XAkshKmFmfKZ7Z3B8vn3RraziIYpDSkdgM_XkZy97MF3vFUep6qFAdt7HrIkTmiaFzFCn92BbkTDAnetoCzL_6KmAitVpsbpCDmI8nESsmzYTYaoo3-g8KugVThoqBXebxEObxEaELprvNX9sGV-G_jkdus2PbvZcwSwFUA6672DmkvVXW8rpqA0DykfDMUHx_DBMXxlKCTSO8Qb7f9QxusxWI0W8Re6X4DjmNeFsYst3ugWD5PlN2ZEjafrsI0100s0xyYuYzHLaZYm8R81j0Vy |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_4103_0366_6999_193443 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_26583 crossref_primary_10_1536_ihj_19_545 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01188-7 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03410.x 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00024.x 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01207.x 10.1109/10.784136 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115642.05037.0E 10.7326/0003-4819-107-5-714 10.1093/europace/eum021 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01152.x 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.05.021 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn269 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01036-5 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.002 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940577 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80186-X 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09382.x 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.939249 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00301.x 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00968.x 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90081-7 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276ce9b 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00184.x 10.3109/07853890.2010.521764 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jan 5, 2015 Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal 2015 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2015 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd. – notice: Copyright Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. Jan 5, 2015 – notice: Copyright © Wanfang Data Co. Ltd. All Rights Reserved. – notice: Copyright: © 2015 Chinese Medical Journal 2015 |
| DBID | 2RA 92L CQIGP W91 ~WA AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 2B. 4A8 92I 93N PSX TCJ 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.4103/0366-6999.147798 |
| DatabaseName | 维普期刊资源整合服务平台 中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点 中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台 中文科技期刊数据库-医药卫生 中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点 CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic Wanfang Data Journals - Hong Kong WANFANG Data Centre Wanfang Data Journals 万方数据期刊 - 香港版 China Online Journals (COJ) China Online Journals (COJ) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| DocumentTitleAlternate | Assessment of Adaptive Rate Response Provided by Accelerometer, Minute Ventilation and Dual Sensor Compared with Normal Sinus Rhythm During Exercise： A Self-controlled Study in Chronotropically Competent Subjects |
| EISSN | 2542-5641 |
| EndPage | 31 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_48ea4831d80c4cfdae1c44d685bcb70b PMC4837815 zhcmj201501005 A416777986 25563309 10_4103_0366_6999_147798 10.4103/0366-6999.147798_25_Assessme 663680754 |
| Genre | Clinical Trial Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | --- -05 -0E -SE -S~ .55 .GJ 29B 2B. 2C~ 2RA 2WC 3V. 40I 53G 5GY 5RE 5VR 5VS 6J9 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ 92F 92I 92L 92M 93N 93R 9D9 9DE AAHPQ AASCR ABASU ABCQX ABDIG ABUWG ABVCZ ABXLX ACGFO ACGFS ACILI ADGGA ADHPY ADPDF ADRAZ AENEX AFDTB AFKRA AFUIB AHMBA AHVBC AINUH AJIOK AJNWD ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALMTX AMJPA AMKUR AMNEI ANFDX AOHHW BENPR BPHCQ BVXVI C1A CAJEE CAJUS CCEZO CCPQU CHBEP CIEJG CQIGP CW9 DIK DIWNM EBS EEVPB EJD F5P FA0 FCALG FRP FYUFA GNXGY GQDEL GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HLJTE HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW IKREB INH INR IPNFZ ITC JUIAU KQ8 L7B M1P M48 OK1 OPUJH OVD OVDNE OVEED OXXIT P2P P6G PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PV9 Q-- Q-4 R-E RIG RLZ RNS RPM RT5 RZL S.. T8U TCJ TEORI TGQ TR2 TSPGW U1F U1G U5E U5O UKHRP W2D W91 WFFXF X7J X7M XSB ZA5 ZGI ZXP ~WA 0R~ AAAAV AAIQE ABZZY ACXJB AFBFQ AHQNM AJCLO AJZMW AKCTQ ALIPV ALKUP AOQMC BQLVK H13 AAYXX CITATION OVT PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 4A8 PMFND PSX 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c662e-c5e074665642a054553e5f8f80dfa7ecaeb202cf218668eb67a65f3c3e79992a3 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 0366-6999 2542-5641 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:37 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:29:48 EDT 2025 Thu May 29 03:55:57 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 10:06:25 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 23:36:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:45:48 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:45:37 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:23:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 06:55:15 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:55:59 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:05:16 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:46:09 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 14 10:37:41 EST 2024 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Accelerometer Adaptive Rate Pacing Minute Ventilation Dual Sensor |
| Language | English |
| License | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c662e-c5e074665642a054553e5f8f80dfa7ecaeb202cf218668eb67a65f3c3e79992a3 |
| Notes | Accelerometer; Adaptive Rate Pacing; Dual Sensor; Minute Ventilation 11-2154/R Background：Dual sensor （DS） for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS （accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV]） and normal sinus rate response were compared in a self-controlled way during exercise treadmill testing. Methods：This self-controlled study was performed in atrioventricular block patients with normal sinus function who met the indications of pacemaker implant.Twenty-one patients came to the 1-month follow-up visit.Patients performed a treadmill test 1-month post implant while programmed in DDDR and sensor passive mode.For these patients,sensor response factors were left at default settings （ACC =8,MV =3） and sensor indicated rates （SIRs） for DS,ACC and MV sensor were retrieved from the pacemaker memories,along with measured sinus node （SN） rates from the beginning to 1-minute after the end of the treadmill test,and compared among study groups.Repeated measures analysis of variance and profile analysis,as well as variance analysis of randomized block designs,were used for statistical analysis. Results：Fifteen patients （15/2 l） were determined to be chronotropically competent.The mean differences between DS SIRs and intrinsic sinus rates during treadmill testing were smaller than those for ACC and MV sensor （mean difference between SIR and SN rate：ACC vs.SN,MV vs.SN,DS vs.SN,respectively,34.84,17.60,16.15 beats/min）,though no sensors could mimic sinus rates under the default settings for sensor response factor （ACC vs.SN P-adjusted 〈 0.001; MV vs.SN P-adjusted =0.002; DS vs.SN P-adjusted =0.005）.However,both in the range of 1st minute and first 3 minutes of exercise,only the DS SIR profile did not differ from sinus rates （P-adjusted =0.09,0.90,respectively）. Conclusions：The DS under default settings provides more physiological rate response during physical activity than the corresponding single sensors （ACC or MV sensor）.Further study is needed to determine if individual optimization would further improve adaptive performance of the DS. ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/48ea4831d80c4cfdae1c44d685bcb70b |
| PMID | 25563309 |
| PQID | 1925490678 |
| PQPubID | 2042885 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_48ea4831d80c4cfdae1c44d685bcb70b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4837815 wanfang_journals_zhcmj201501005 proquest_miscellaneous_1643405893 proquest_journals_1925490678 gale_infotracmisc_A416777986 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A416777986 gale_healthsolutions_A416777986 pubmed_primary_25563309 crossref_citationtrail_10_4103_0366_6999_147798 crossref_primary_10_4103_0366_6999_147798 wolterskluwer_medknow_10_4103_0366-6999_147798_25_Assessme chongqing_primary_663680754 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 20150101 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2015-01-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 1 year: 2015 text: 20150101 day: 01 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | China |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: China – name: Baltimore – name: India |
| PublicationTitle | Chinese medical journal |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | Chinese Medical Journal |
| PublicationTitle_FL | Chinese Medical Journal |
| PublicationYear | 2015 |
| Publisher | Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China%Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Wolters Kluwer |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Medknow Publications Pvt Ltd – name: Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd – name: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Ovid Technologies – name: Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, Shanghai 200032, China%Institute of Advancing Science, Boston Scientific-China, Shanghai 200032, China – name: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd – name: Wolters Kluwer |
| References | Kappenberger (R2-5-20190121) 1994; 127 Savonen (R15-5-20190121) 2008; 29 Erol-Yilmaz (R12-5-20190121) 2005; 28 Kitzman (R17-5-20190121) 2011; 29 Israel (R4-5-20190121) 2000; 86 Roberts (R3-5-20190121) 1995; 18 Epstein (R8-5-20190121) 2013; 127 Shukla (R20-5-20190121) 2005; 28 Coman (R7-5-20190121) 2008; 31 Benditt (R1-5-20190121) 1987; 107 Gulati (R13-5-20190121) 2010; 122 Lamas (R19-5-20190121) 2007; 4 Lamas (R23-5-20190121) 2004; 109 Matula (R10-5-20190121) 1996; 19 Brubaker (R18-5-20190121) 2011; 123 van (R22-5-20190121) 2007; 9 Bonnet (R5-5-20190121) 1998; 21 Kiviniemi (R14-5-20190121) 2011; 43 Werner (R9-5-20190121) 1999; 46 Page (R6-5-20190121) 2003; 26 Padeletti (R21-5-20190121) 2006; 29 Shaber (R11-5-20190121) 2008; 31 Sulke (R24-5-20190121) 1991; 17 Dresing (R16-5-20190121) 2000; 86 11084105 - Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 2;86(9A):86K-94K 16441715 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Jan;29(1):34-40 9825318 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2198-203 10493068 - IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Sep;46(9):1057-64 17350981 - Europace. 2007 Apr;9(4):233-8 14757681 - Circulation. 2004 Feb 3;109(4):443-51 10980208 - Am J Cardiol. 2000 Sep 15;86(6):602-9 1993790 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Mar 1;17(3):696-706 21803233 - Cardiol Clin. 2011 Aug;29(3):461-77 8160575 - Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1022-6 18950301 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;31(11):1433-42 20585008 - Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):130-7 17765608 - Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1125-32 8823829 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Jul;19(7):1036-41 16105001 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;28(8):762-70 8539156 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Oct;18(10):1882-8 23255456 - Circulation. 2013 Jan 22;127(3):e283-352 21382903 - Circulation. 2011 Mar 8;123(9):1010-20 3310795 - Ann Intern Med. 1987 Nov;107(5):714-24 12687820 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):239-43 20977382 - Ann Med. 2011 Feb;43(1):33-9 15660797 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28(1):17-24 18233972 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):192-7 18556711 - Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug;29(15):1896-902 |
| References_xml | – volume: 18 start-page: 1882 year: 1995 ident: R3-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb03836.x – volume: 86 start-page: 86K year: 2000 ident: R4-5-20190121 publication-title: Am J Cardiol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01188-7 – volume: 19 start-page: 1036 year: 1996 ident: R10-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03410.x – volume: 26 start-page: 239 year: 2003 ident: R6-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00024.x – volume: 31 start-page: 1433 year: 2008 ident: R7-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01207.x – volume: 46 start-page: 1057 year: 1999 ident: R9-5-20190121 publication-title: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng doi: 10.1109/10.784136 – volume: 109 start-page: 443 year: 2004 ident: R23-5-20190121 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000115642.05037.0E – volume: 107 start-page: 714 year: 1987 ident: R1-5-20190121 publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-5-714 – volume: 9 start-page: 233 year: 2007 ident: R22-5-20190121 publication-title: Europace doi: 10.1093/europace/eum021 – volume: 21 start-page: 2198 year: 1998 ident: R5-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01152.x – volume: 4 start-page: 1125 year: 2007 ident: R19-5-20190121 publication-title: Heart Rhythm doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.05.021 – volume: 29 start-page: 1896 year: 2008 ident: R15-5-20190121 publication-title: Eur Heart J doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn269 – volume: 86 start-page: 602 year: 2000 ident: R16-5-20190121 publication-title: Am J Cardiol doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01036-5 – volume: 29 start-page: 461 year: 2011 ident: R17-5-20190121 publication-title: Cardiol Clin doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2011.06.002 – volume: 123 start-page: 1010 year: 2011 ident: R18-5-20190121 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.940577 – volume: 17 start-page: 696 year: 1991 ident: R24-5-20190121 publication-title: J Am Coll Cardiol doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(10)80186-X – volume: 28 start-page: 17 year: 2005 ident: R12-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.09382.x – volume: 122 start-page: 130 year: 2010 ident: R13-5-20190121 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.939249 – volume: 29 start-page: 34 year: 2006 ident: R21-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00301.x – volume: 31 start-page: 192 year: 2008 ident: R11-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2007.00968.x – volume: 127 start-page: 1022 year: 1994 ident: R2-5-20190121 publication-title: Am Heart J doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(94)90081-7 – volume: 127 start-page: e283 year: 2013 ident: R8-5-20190121 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318276ce9b – volume: 28 start-page: 762 year: 2005 ident: R20-5-20190121 publication-title: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00184.x – volume: 43 start-page: 33 year: 2011 ident: R14-5-20190121 publication-title: Ann Med doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.521764 – reference: 17350981 - Europace. 2007 Apr;9(4):233-8 – reference: 20977382 - Ann Med. 2011 Feb;43(1):33-9 – reference: 18950301 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;31(11):1433-42 – reference: 10980208 - Am J Cardiol. 2000 Sep 15;86(6):602-9 – reference: 1993790 - J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Mar 1;17(3):696-706 – reference: 17765608 - Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1125-32 – reference: 21803233 - Cardiol Clin. 2011 Aug;29(3):461-77 – reference: 11084105 - Am J Cardiol. 2000 Nov 2;86(9A):86K-94K – reference: 9825318 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2198-203 – reference: 16105001 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Aug;28(8):762-70 – reference: 20585008 - Circulation. 2010 Jul 13;122(2):130-7 – reference: 18233972 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Feb;31(2):192-7 – reference: 8160575 - Am Heart J. 1994 Apr;127(4 Pt 2):1022-6 – reference: 8539156 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Oct;18(10):1882-8 – reference: 3310795 - Ann Intern Med. 1987 Nov;107(5):714-24 – reference: 12687820 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1 Pt 2):239-43 – reference: 15660797 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28(1):17-24 – reference: 23255456 - Circulation. 2013 Jan 22;127(3):e283-352 – reference: 18556711 - Eur Heart J. 2008 Aug;29(15):1896-902 – reference: 21382903 - Circulation. 2011 Mar 8;123(9):1010-20 – reference: 14757681 - Circulation. 2004 Feb 3;109(4):443-51 – reference: 10493068 - IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Sep;46(9):1057-64 – reference: 8823829 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Jul;19(7):1036-41 – reference: 16441715 - Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006 Jan;29(1):34-40 |
| SSID | ssj0025576 |
| Score | 2.0508263 |
| Snippet | Background：Dual sensor （DS） for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS （accelerometer [ACC] and minute... Background: Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute... Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological. To evaluate its superiority, the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute ventilation [MV])... Background:Dual sensor (DS) for rate adaption was supposed to be more physiological.To evaluate its superiority,the DS (accelerometer [ACC] and minute... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral wanfang proquest gale pubmed crossref wolterskluwer chongqing |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 25 |
| SubjectTerms | Accelerometer; Adaptive Rate Pacing; Dual Sensor; Minute Ventilation Accelerometers Adult Aged Cardiac arrhythmia Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - methods Cardiology Cardiovascular disease Clinical trials Comparative analysis Dosage and administration Electrocardiography Exercise - physiology Exercise Test Female Fitness equipment Heart rate Humans Male Metabolism Middle Aged Mortality Original Pacemaker, Artificial Pacemakers Patients Physiological aspects Quality of life Respiratory system agents Response rates Sensors Sinuses 主管 加速度计 双传感器 自我控制 自适应 评估 通气量 速率 |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3daxQxEA9SUAQpfrtttREEEVxuP5L96NtaW4pwRU4rfQvZbOKd3u2evTvK-Xf6Bzmzya23ivjiazLJZjOTmUky-Q0hL_C5Z1oG3NecpT4LWelLUIp-qPJchtpURuID5-F5cnbB3l3yy61UXxgTZuGB7cQNWKYly-KwygLFlKmkDhVjVZLxUpVpUKL2BZu32Uy5rRbnqbulTPwEfCB7QcnCIB50ZaAk0jTPEFRh3NSfv4Gp6BmnFsP_T029Zap-D6O8eS1rI7GbO9cNXnYvvrax7lsW6_Qu2XWuJi3sL94jN3R9n9wausv0B-RH0aFy0sbQopJz1H10BO4nHdnYWU3f26d6FS3XtFAKrBQCHMBXX9PhpF4B6ScMOLIhdVTWFX27gq9-gO1xc0WPXYg7xfNeeo4OMtRBuwUdjdfL8Qyo8WSRnrjUT0e0gLZT47sY-im0xVjHNZ3UtEXybaB4jqI1Xbfdo9e_pKAA8URp8ZBcnJ58PD7zXZIHXyVJpH3FNaY8AbeSRRL8R85jzU1msgDEJNVKwtY_iJTB3FlJpssklQk3sYp1CjyMZPyI7NRNrZ8QGlUoFjpSkucskCYrKx5WCKjIc_BCuEf2O06LuQXzEOBxJQjIzDwy2PBeKIePjmk6pgL2SSg5AiVHoOQIKzkeedW12HT3d9o3KE4dHaJ6twUg68LJuviXrHvkEIVR2CeynW4SBXjVKX4l8cjLlgK1EwxeSffIAiYIcb56lAc9StAqql-9EXjhtNpCwG6Asxz9G48876qxJUbq1bpZAQ24uAxzVcYeeWzXR_fTCHcXx0HukbS3cnqz0q-pJ-MW87xNfBACCw_dGvs1qu9jNfsS4cldCCbFI0e9tSdm9llpjzP-FmdgVGKz3vb-B5f2yW0cjT2nOyA7y6uVfgqe67J81iqpn9dJlfA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1tb9MwELZgCISEEG-DsMGMhISQiJoXO072BYWxaULqhApD-2Y5jrMW2qTri6byO_lB3CVu2oDga3yO4_j8-Hw-P0fIa7zuKTKPu4Yz4TKfZa4CUHR9nSTKN0VeKLzg3D-LTs_Zpwt-YR1ucxtWucbEGqjzSqOPvAeWCGxlEFvfT69czBqFp6s2hcZNcgupyzCkS1xsNlycC3tWGbkRWELNMSXzvbDXPgOoECKJkVphWJWXV7BgdJaomsn_b7zeWrD-DKa8fa3KQuFr7l1XeOQ9_1FHvG-tWycPyH1rcNK00ZCH5IYpH5E7fXuk_pj8SltuTloVNM3VFBGQDsAIpYMmgtbQz82FvZxmK5pqDWsV0hxAq-9of1QuQfQbhh01gXVUlTn9uIRWv8AmuZrRIxvoTtHrS8_QTIYyqDeng-FqMZyANPoX6bFNAHVIU6g7LlwbST-GuhjxuKKjktZ8vhU8nqKCjVf169H2X1CAQfQrzZ-Q85Pjr0enrk314OooCoyrucHEJ2BcskCBFcl5aHgRF7EHyiKMViYLvEAXmEErik0WCRXxItShETCGgQp3yU5ZleYZoUGeRzE3gVY8YZ4q4iznfo60ijwBW4Q7ZK8daTltKD0k2F0R0jIzh_TWYy-1ZUnHZB1jCbsl1ByJmiNRc2SjOQ5529ZYv-7fsh9QnVo55PauH1SzS2mhQrLYKBaHfh57mukiV8bXjGGnMp0JL3PIASqjbC7KtgglU7CtBbYSOeRNLYEYBR-vlb1qAT8I2b46kvsdScAW3S1eK7y02DaXm5nokFdtMdbEeL3SVEuQAUOXYcbK0CFPm_nRdhpJ78LQSxwiOjOn81e6JeVoWDOf1-kPfBjCAzvHNl_1c6gn3wP03_mwsDjksDP35KS5XNoZGXdrZOCr5Hq-Pf9_r_fIXWyn8cPtk53FbGlegGW6yF7W8PMb3UuMWw priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
| Title | Assessment of Adaptive Rate Response Provided by Accelerometer, Minute Ventilation and Dual Sensor Compared with Normal Sinus Rhythm During Exercise： A Self-controlled Study in Chronotropically Competent Subjects |
| URI | http://lib.cqvip.com/qk/85656X/201501/663680754.html http://www.cmj.org/article.asp?issn=0366-6999;year=2015;volume=128;issue=1;spage=25;epage=31;aulast=Cao;type=0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25563309 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1925490678 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1643405893 https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/periodical/zhcmj201501005 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4837815 https://doaj.org/article/48ea4831d80c4cfdae1c44d685bcb70b |
| Volume | 128 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1bb9MwFLbYJhASQtwJG52RkBAS2XKx42QvKBsdE1KnqVDUN8txnLXQJVsvGuV38oM4J0mzBYZ4qar42Ln4XD7b50LIawz3FInDbcOZsJnLEluBUrRdHUXKNVmaKQxw7h0HRwP2aciHV-HR9Qec3bi0w3pSg-lk58fF8j0IPODXHeY6_i4o4cAOAOmA2AsRhWtkA-ySQDHtseZMAbCzqE8uK-rq0PLGETDRwqjITy_AfLQMVpnX_2_tfc18_elaeftS5ZnCYe5dFngAPvte-r9fs2KHD8j9Gn7SuOKXh-SWyR-RO736gP0x-RU3mTppkdE4VeeoD2kfICntV_60hp5U4XspTZY01hosFyY9gLu-o71xvgDSr-iEVLnZUZWn9MMC7voZlszFlB7Ubu8U94DpMYJmaIN-M9ofLeejM6DG3UbarctB7dEY-k4yu_arn0Bf9H9c0nFOy-y-BVw-R3abLMvhcSUwp6AUcZdp9oQMDrtfDo7suvCDrYPAM7bmBsugANRkngJMyblveBZmoQOsI4xWJvEcT2dYTysITRIIFfDM174RMIee8p-S9bzIzXNCvTQNQm48rXjEHJWFScrdFJMs8giQCbfIZjPT8rxK8CEBhQWYpJlZZHc191LXOdOxdMdEwtoJOUci50jkHFlxjkXeNj1Ww_2bdh_ZqaHDTN_lhWJ6KmvFIVloFAt9Nw0dzXSWKuNqxvClEp0IJ7HINjKjrMJmG30lY0DaAu8SWORNSYEyBA-vVR14AR8Ic3-1KLdalKBpdLt5xfByJagSVgicRYh5LPKqacae6L2Xm2IBNAB7Gdav9C3yrJKP5qUxBZ7vO5FFREtyWl-l3ZKPR2Ue9LIYggtTuF3L2NVT_Rzps28e7ua5YGYssteSPXlWhZq2Zsa-NjPwVHIlby_-O_wmuYv_q425LbI-ny7MS4Cq86RD1sRQdMjGfvf4pN8pN3zg9-PQ7ZS66TfH4JSH |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLZGJy4SQtwJG8xIIIREtFzsJJ2EUHfTxtZqKhvam3EcZy10Sbe2msqP4tfwgzgncbIFBG97jY9v8fHnc-xzIeQ1unuGscNtzVloM5fFtgRQtF3VbktXp0kq0cG52wt2jtinY368QH5WvjBoVllhYgHUSa7wjnwVJBFQZRBbP47PbMwaha-rVQqNki329PwCVLbJh91NWN83nre9dbixY5usArYKAk_bimvMsQFyDPMkCCyc-5qnURo5MK5QKwm6puOpFJM1BZGOg1AGPPWVr0MQpjzpQ7s3yCLzQZVpkcX1rd5Bv1bxOA_N62hgB0BePowy1_FX628ATmHYjjCYwyDPTs7giGocikXugL9PiCtH5J_mmzcvZJZKbObuRY6P7JPvhY39lZNy-z65Z0Rc2il58gFZ0NlDcqtrHvEfkV-dOhoozVPaSeQYMZf2Qeyl_dJmV9OD0kUwofGcdpSC0xEDK0Cv72l3mM2A9AsaOpWmfFRmCd2cQa-fQS3Pz-mGMa2neM9MeyiYQxnUm9D-YD4dnAI13mjSLZNyao12oO4otY3t_gjqoo3lnA4zWkQQzuHzGFl6NC-aR21jSgF48SZr8pgcXQsbPCGtLM_0M0K9JAkirj0leZs5Mo3ihLsJBnLkbZB-uEWW6pUW4zKIiABJL8BA0Mwiq9XaC2XismN6kJEA_Qw5RyDnCOQcUXKORd7VNarm_k27juxU02E08eJDfn4iDDgJFmnJIt9NIkcxlSZSu4oxnFSs4tCJLbKCzChK19waE0UHpPkQewks8ragQFSEwStpnDvgB2F8sQblcoMS0Ew1iyuGFwZNJ-Jy71vkVV2MNdFCMNP5DGhAtGaYI9O3yNNyf9STxjB7vu-0LRI2dk7jrzRLsuGgiLVeJFxwYQlXzB67HNWPgTr95uGNoQtHmUXWGntPnJburI2Vsa-sDIxKVPvt-f9nvUJu7xx298X-bm9vidzBPstbwGXSmp7P9AuQi6fxSwNGlHy9bvz7DZKxyg4 |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment+of+Adaptive+Rate+Response+Provided+by+Accelerometer%2C+Minute+Ventilation+and+Dual+Sensor+Compared+with+Normal+Sinus+Rhythm+During+Exercise%3A+A+Self-controlled+Study+in+Chronotropically+Competent+Subjects&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%8D%8E%E5%8C%BB%E5%AD%A6%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%88%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89&rft.au=Yuanyuan+Cao&rft.au=Yiqun+Zhang&rft.au=Yangang+Su&rft.au=Jin+Bai&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.pub=Department+of+Cardiology%2C+Zhongshan+Hospital%2C+Fudan+University%2C+Shanghai+Institute+of+Cardiovascular+Diseases%2C+Shanghai+200032%2C+China%25Institute+of+Advancing+Science%2C+Boston+Scientific-China%2C+Shanghai+200032%2C+China&rft.issn=0366-6999&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=25&rft.epage=31&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103%2F0366-6999.147798&rft.externalDocID=zhcmj201501005 |
| thumbnail_s | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fimage.cqvip.com%2Fvip1000%2Fqk%2F85656X%2F85656X.jpg http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wanfangdata.com.cn%2Fimages%2FPeriodicalImages%2Fzhcmj%2Fzhcmj.jpg |