Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore-ungulate systems in Scandinavia
1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and...
Saved in:
| Published in | The Journal of animal ecology Vol. 81; no. 2; pp. 443 - 454 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Publishing
01.03.2012
Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown beargray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0157, -0.056, -0.031 and -0.006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their prédation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | 1.
Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator–prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly.
2.
By using periodic Leslie–Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long‐term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator–prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer–red fox–Eurasian lynx–human harvest system with those of the moose–brown bear–gray wolf–human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula.
3.
The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were −0·157, −0·056, −0·031 and −0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities.
4.
Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation.
5.
Our results confirm the complex nature of predator–prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1.Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2.By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3.The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose lambda to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population lambda . Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0.157, -0.056, -0.031 and -0.006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4.Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5.Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. Summary 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator–prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie–Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long‐term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator–prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer–red fox–Eurasian lynx–human harvest system with those of the moose–brown bear–gray wolf–human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were −0·157, −0·056, −0·031 and −0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator–prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown beargray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0157, -0.056, -0.031 and -0.006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their prédation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predatorprey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly.2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula.3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose lambda to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population lambda. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0 157, -0 056, -0 031 and -0 006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities.4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation.5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. Summary 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0·157, -0·056, -0·031 and -0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0·157, -0·056, -0·031 and -0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0·157, -0·056, -0·031 and -0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species.1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator-prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie-Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator-prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer-red fox-Eurasian lynx-human harvest system with those of the moose-brown bear-gray wolf-human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were -0·157, -0·056, -0·031 and -0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator-prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator–prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie–Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long-term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator–prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer–red fox–Eurasian lynx–human harvest system with those of the moose–brown bear–gray wolf–human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were −0·157, −0·056, −0·031 and −0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator–prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex nature of predator–prey interactions often prevents researchers from modelling them explicitly. 2. By using periodic Leslie–Usher matrices and a simulation approach together with parameters obtained from long‐term field projects, we reconstructed the underlying mechanisms of predator–prey demographic interactions and compared the dynamics of the roe deer–red fox–Eurasian lynx–human harvest system with those of the moose–brown bear–gray wolf–human harvest system in the boreal forest ecosystem of the southern Scandinavian Peninsula. 3. The functional relationship of both roe deer and moose λ to changes in predation rates from the four predators was remarkably different. Lynx had the strongest impact among the four predators, whereas predation rates by wolves, red foxes, or brown bears generated minor variations in prey population λ. Elasticity values of lynx, wolf, fox and bear predation rates were −0·157, −0·056, −0·031 and −0·006, respectively, but varied with both predator and prey densities. 4. Differences in predation impact were only partially related to differences in kill or predation rates, but were rather a result of different distribution of predation events among prey age classes. Therefore, the age composition of killed individuals emerged as the main underlying factor determining the overall per capita impact of predation. 5. Our results confirm the complex nature of predator–prey interactions in large terrestrial mammals, by showing that different carnivores preying on the same prey species can exert a dramatically different demographic impact, even in the same ecological context, as a direct consequence of their predation patterns. Similar applications of this analytical framework in other geographical and ecological contexts are needed, but a more general evaluation of the subject is also required, aimed to assess, on a broader systematic and ecological range, what specific traits of a carnivore are most related to its potential impact on prey species. |
| Author | Pedersen, Hans C. Kindberg, Jonas Sand, Håkan Nilsen, Erlend B. Odden, John Liberg, Olof Linnell, John D. C. Panzacchi, Manuela Zimmermann, Barbara Swenson, Jon E. Wabakken, Petter Gervasi, Vincenzo Rauset, Geir R. |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Vincenzo surname: Gervasi fullname: Gervasi, Vincenzo – sequence: 2 givenname: Erlend B. surname: Nilsen fullname: Nilsen, Erlend B. – sequence: 3 givenname: Håkan surname: Sand fullname: Sand, Håkan – sequence: 4 givenname: Manuela surname: Panzacchi fullname: Panzacchi, Manuela – sequence: 5 givenname: Geir R. surname: Rauset fullname: Rauset, Geir R. – sequence: 6 givenname: Hans C. surname: Pedersen fullname: Pedersen, Hans C. – sequence: 7 givenname: Jonas surname: Kindberg fullname: Kindberg, Jonas – sequence: 8 givenname: Petter surname: Wabakken fullname: Wabakken, Petter – sequence: 9 givenname: Barbara surname: Zimmermann fullname: Zimmermann, Barbara – sequence: 10 givenname: John surname: Odden fullname: Odden, John – sequence: 11 givenname: Olof surname: Liberg fullname: Liberg, Olof – sequence: 12 givenname: Jon E. surname: Swenson fullname: Swenson, Jon E. – sequence: 13 givenname: John D. C. surname: Linnell fullname: Linnell, John D. C. |
| BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25567942$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22077484$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://res.slu.se/id/publ/60091$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
| BookMark | eNqNkl2P1CAUhhuzxv3Qn6AhJkZvOgKlLXhhstmsX9moiXpNTimdYdJCF9qZnV_hX5Y6s7PuXpjhBgLP-8I5vKfJkXVWJwkieEbieLuckazIU1rkxYxiQmaYCMpnN4-Sk_3BUXKCMSUpLwU-Tk5DWGKMS4qzJ8kxpbgsGWcnye_vXtdGDcbO0bDQqHeDtoOBFtW6c3MP_cIoZLoe1IBcg_qIw-B8QM5OAuOnrc07BEi5SHkYzEojsNBuggmTZFg7pMBbs3Jep6Odjy0MGoVNGHQXkLHohwJbGwsrA0-Txw20QT_bzWfJrw-XPy8-pVffPn6-OL9KVSyNp6DLqqoaLGitCa2UEppBrfMsq7KC5pjjnDYCBGc11kzRitS6gpLSKmdZRYvsLEm3vmGt-7GSvTcd-I10YGRoxwr8NMmgZYGxIJF_v-Uj3OlaxSZ5aO_J7p9Ys5Bzt5IZYzgvRDR4vTPw7nrUYZCdCUq3LVjtxiDj_wlCKc0OIAvOOWET-ea_JGFMiLzIChzRlw_QpRt9_KXJj2CC4xMj9OLfIvfV3cYlAq92AAQFbePBKhPuuDwvSsHoXbeUdyF43UhlhpgMN_XGtJJgOeVYLuUUVznFVU45ln9zLG-iAX9gcHvHAdLd3WvT6s3BOvnl_OvltIwGz7cGyxCDvjdghIlccJ79AQFLF4M |
| CODEN | JAECAP |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_3003 crossref_primary_10_1890_ES14_00444_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_9125 crossref_primary_10_1111_csp2_12842 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_452 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2019_06_001 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2013_08_022 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_02218 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_11134 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10018_020_00299_y crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_1506 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_21681 crossref_primary_10_1890_ES13_00099_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12686_018_1037_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_acv_12920 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecm_1594 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42991_020_00031_z crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_52644_w crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0139837 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_024_01801_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_brv_13143 crossref_primary_10_3996_JFWM_21_049 crossref_primary_10_1111_jzo_12088 crossref_primary_10_1111_jzo_12084 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2015_2207 crossref_primary_10_1139_cjz_2017_0282 crossref_primary_10_3957_056_043_0116 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2021_06_025 crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_02017 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0158449 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_78585_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2024_e03318 crossref_primary_10_1080_10871209_2015_1006796 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_516 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_013_0791_y crossref_primary_10_1016_j_baae_2015_11_001 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2022_819137 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_7998_2012_00980_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_023_05335_8 crossref_primary_10_3390_d12090356 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41416_020_01110_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mambio_2016_11_001 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_556 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_12310 crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2656_13200 crossref_primary_10_1111_1440_1703_12130 crossref_primary_10_2981_10_113 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ecolmodel_2021_109426 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2020_118298 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10144_014_0456_z crossref_primary_10_1111_rec_13741 crossref_primary_10_3390_sym10100532 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1413965111 crossref_primary_10_1071_AM19041 crossref_primary_10_3390_d13120678 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2016_1625 crossref_primary_10_1002_eap_70000 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_014_3004_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10344_013_0745_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_bor_12380 crossref_primary_10_1002_jwmg_21689 crossref_primary_10_1002_wlb3_01248 crossref_primary_10_1111_jzo_13231 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0194566 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2021_630944 crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2020_577963 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jnc_2022_126186 crossref_primary_10_2981_wlb_00684 crossref_primary_10_2981_wlb_00685 crossref_primary_10_1890_12_1615_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arr_2014_12_011 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0168062 crossref_primary_10_1111_mam_12047 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10530_019_02093_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2022_e02089 crossref_primary_10_3390_d12090350 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_biocon_2013_09_024 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_020_66626_1 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01276.x 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01908-X 10.2307/3808799 10.1007/s11284-007-0452-2 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1070:SONYEB]2.0.CO;2 10.1007/s10344-005-0023-1 10.2307/3802519 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00480.x 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01547.x 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[467:SOELLL]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01314.x 10.2193/2007-060 10.1007/s00267-010-9455-9 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2338:TPDIPM]2.0.CO;2 10.2307/3802065 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00965.x 10.1139/Z06-150 10.2307/2426345 10.1139/z99-188 10.1139/z01-029 10.2307/1939551 10.2981/wlb.1997.003 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:CBRINF]2.0.CO;2 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01769.x 10.1007/s00442-008-0969-2 10.1080/11956860.2001.11682641 10.2193/2006-308 10.1098/rspb.2006.3467 10.1007/s11284-008-0525-x 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90293-3 10.2980/17-2-3314 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01018.x 10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_11 10.2307/1937455 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01523.x 10.1007/BF00379664 10.2193/2006-102 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01289.x 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0010:WMIOIR]2.0.CO;2 10.2307/1578 10.2981/wlb.1999.022 10.18637/jss.v022.i11 10.2307/3545248 10.2981/wlb.2002.015 10.1890/02-0672 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3010139.x 10.1139/Z07-120 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[914:UGTAGC]2.0.CO;2 10.2307/3802739 10.1007/s11284-009-0600-y 10.1007/s10344-006-0052-4 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.09.007 10.2981/wlb.1998.017 10.1139/z97-824 10.1038/nature01934 10.1098/rspb.2005.3447 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | 2012 British Ecological Society 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society 2015 INIST-CNRS 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society. 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society 2011 |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: 2012 British Ecological Society – notice: 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society. – notice: 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society 2011 |
| CorporateAuthor | Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| CorporateAuthor_xml | – name: Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet |
| DBID | 24P AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7ST 7U6 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01928.x |
| DatabaseName | Wiley Online Library Open Access CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Animal Behavior Abstracts Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Technology Research Database Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management Engineering Research Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Genetics Abstracts AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) SwePub SwePub Articles |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Entomology Abstracts Genetics Abstracts Technology Research Database Animal Behavior Abstracts Engineering Research Database Ecology Abstracts Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic Environment Abstracts Sustainability Science Abstracts MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Ecology Abstracts Entomology Abstracts MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: 24P name: Wiley Online Library Open Access url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Zoology Biology |
| EISSN | 1365-2656 |
| EndPage | 454 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_slubar_slu_se_60091 PMC3440569 2583633771 22077484 25567942 10_1111_j_1365_2656_2011_01928_x JANE1928 41495988 |
| Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Feature |
| GeographicLocations | Scandinavia Europe Norway Sweden |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Sweden – name: Norway – name: Scandinavia |
| GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 1OC 29J 2AX 2WC 33P 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5GY 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHBH AAHKG AAHQN AAISJ AAKGQ AAMMB AAMNL AANLZ AAONW AASGY AAXRX AAYCA AAZKR ABAWQ ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEML ABJNI ABPFR ABPLY ABPQH ABPVW ABSQW ABTLG ABXSQ ACAHQ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACHIC ACHJO ACNCT ACPOU ACPRK ACSCC ACSTJ ACUBG ACXBN ACXQS ADBBV ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADMHG ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZMN AEFGJ AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEUPB AEUYR AEYWJ AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFRAH AFWVQ AFXHP AFZJQ AGUYK AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG AIURR AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN ALVPJ AMBMR AMYDB AQVQM ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 C45 CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DIK DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DU5 E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD EYRJQ F00 F01 F04 F5P G-S G.N GODZA H.T H.X HF~ HGLYW HZI HZ~ IHE IPSME IX1 J0M JAAYA JAS JBMMH JBS JBZCM JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLS JLXEF JPL JPM JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LUTES LW6 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NF~ O66 O9- OIG OK1 OVD P2P P2W P2X P4D PQQKQ Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TEORI TN5 UB1 UPT W8V W99 WBKPD WH7 WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WXSBR WYISQ XG1 YQT ZCG ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT 24P 31~ AAHHS ABTAH ABYAD ACCFJ ACKIV ACTWD ADZOD AEEZP AEQDE AEUQT AFPWT AI. AIWBW AJBDE AS~ CAG DOOOF ESX FVMVE GTFYD HGD HQ2 HTVGU HVGLF JSODD MVM NHB VH1 WHG WRC ZY4 AAYXX AGHNM CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7QG 7SN 7SS 8FD C1K FR3 P64 RC3 7S9 L.6 7ST 7U6 7X8 5PM ADTPV AOWAS |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6568-ae7bbbf092de12bcc9e4ade533b362508052f9a984d0e4c2b1deba722b543b263 |
| IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
| ISSN | 0021-8790 1365-2656 |
| IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 06:36:44 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 14:34:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 05:59:09 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:04:45 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:34:29 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 10:43:40 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 02:36:32 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:16:24 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:09:56 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 16:36:15 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 21:18:47 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 2 |
| Keywords | Predator prey relation Fissipedia Carnivora Life history Demography stalker Alces alces Ursus anctos Lynx lynx Carnivorous animal Scandinavia courser Capreolus capreolus Vertebrata Mammalia kill rate Artiodactyla Canis lupus Ungulata Vulpes vulpes |
| Language | English |
| License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 2011 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2011 British Ecological Society. Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6568-ae7bbbf092de12bcc9e4ade533b362508052f9a984d0e4c2b1deba722b543b263 |
| Notes | http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms Re‐use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms |
| OpenAccessLink | https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2656.2011.01928.x |
| PMID | 22077484 |
| PQID | 921010693 |
| PQPubID | 37522 |
| PageCount | 12 |
| ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_slubar_slu_se_60091 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_3440569 proquest_miscellaneous_928912223 proquest_miscellaneous_926888143 proquest_miscellaneous_1449956360 proquest_journals_921010693 pubmed_primary_22077484 pascalfrancis_primary_25567942 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1365_2656_2011_01928_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2656_2011_01928_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2656_2011_01928_x_JANE1928 jstor_primary_41495988 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | March 2012 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2012-03-01 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2012 text: March 2012 |
| PublicationDecade | 2010 |
| PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford – name: England – name: London |
| PublicationTitle | The Journal of animal ecology |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | J Anim Ecol |
| PublicationYear | 2012 |
| Publisher | Blackwell Publishing Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell |
| Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Publishing – name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd – name: Blackwell |
| References | 2006; 70 1992; 120 2010; 17 1949; 18 2008b; 86 2007; 71 2008; 77 1995; 133 2009a; 78 2008; 72 2007; 76 1997; 3 1992; 56 1985; 65 2001 2000; 15 1996; 60 2005; 74 2008; 24 2008; 156 1994; 70 2007; 22 2005; 33 2009; 18 1989 1994; 75 1966; 4 2004; 85 2009; 24 2006; 52 1987; 54 2011; 80 2000; 64 2002; 8 2006; 273 2008 2005; 42 2003; 39 2005 1999; 63 2002 1999; 5 2007; 13 2003; 31 1999; 9 2010; 45 2008a; 23 2009b; 78 2003; 425 2006; 84 2005; 166 2006; 87 1997; 75 2000; 78 1991; 61 2001; 8 2000; 31 2011; 42 2001; 79 1998; 4 e_1_2_6_51_1 e_1_2_6_53_1 e_1_2_6_32_1 Wabakken P. (e_1_2_6_65_1) 2001; 79 e_1_2_6_30_1 Olsson O. (e_1_2_6_44_1) 1997; 3 Morris W.F. (e_1_2_6_36_1) 2002 e_1_2_6_19_1 e_1_2_6_13_1 e_1_2_6_59_1 e_1_2_6_11_1 e_1_2_6_34_1 e_1_2_6_17_1 e_1_2_6_15_1 e_1_2_6_38_1 e_1_2_6_57_1 e_1_2_6_62_1 e_1_2_6_64_1 e_1_2_6_43_1 e_1_2_6_20_1 e_1_2_6_41_1 e_1_2_6_60_1 e_1_2_6_9_1 e_1_2_6_5_1 e_1_2_6_7_1 R Development Core Team (e_1_2_6_49_1) 2008 e_1_2_6_3_1 e_1_2_6_66_1 e_1_2_6_45_1 e_1_2_6_47_1 e_1_2_6_52_1 e_1_2_6_54_1 e_1_2_6_10_1 e_1_2_6_31_1 Gasaway W.C. (e_1_2_6_22_1) 1992; 120 Hebblewhite M. (e_1_2_6_26_1) 2003; 31 e_1_2_6_50_1 Skellam J.G. (e_1_2_6_56_1) 1966; 4 Ballard W.B. (e_1_2_6_6_1) 1987; 54 e_1_2_6_14_1 e_1_2_6_35_1 e_1_2_6_12_1 e_1_2_6_33_1 Skalski J.R. (e_1_2_6_55_1) 2005 e_1_2_6_18_1 e_1_2_6_39_1 e_1_2_6_16_1 e_1_2_6_37_1 e_1_2_6_58_1 Lavsund S. (e_1_2_6_28_1) 2003; 39 e_1_2_6_63_1 e_1_2_6_42_1 e_1_2_6_21_1 e_1_2_6_40_1 e_1_2_6_61_1 e_1_2_6_8_1 Gorini L. (e_1_2_6_24_1) 2011; 42 e_1_2_6_4_1 e_1_2_6_25_1 e_1_2_6_48_1 e_1_2_6_23_1 e_1_2_6_2_1 e_1_2_6_29_1 e_1_2_6_67_1 e_1_2_6_27_1 e_1_2_6_46_1 |
| References_xml | – volume: 61 start-page: 401 year: 1991 end-page: 411 article-title: What are the effects of predators on large ungulate populations? publication-title: Oikos – volume: 24 start-page: 547 year: 2008 end-page: 557 article-title: Encounter frequencies between GPS‐collared wolves ( ) and moose ( ) in a Scandinavian wolf territory publication-title: Ecological Research – volume: 8 start-page: 109 year: 2002 end-page: 115 article-title: Significance of lynx predation for roe deer and chamois in the Swiss Jura Mountains publication-title: Wildlife Biology – year: 2005 – volume: 76 start-page: 899 year: 2007 end-page: 907 article-title: Demographic analysis of a declining pika population: linking survival to broad‐scale climate patterns via spring snowmelt patterns publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 63 start-page: 354 year: 1999 end-page: 358 article-title: Effects of ear‐tagging with radiotransmitters on survival of moose calves publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – year: 2001 – volume: 52 start-page: 237 year: 2006 end-page: 244 article-title: Diet of Eurasian lynx, , in the boreal forest of southeastern Norway: the relative importance of livestock and hares at low roe deer density publication-title: European Journal of Wildlife Research – volume: 39 start-page: 109 year: 2003 end-page: 130 article-title: Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia publication-title: Alces – volume: 84 start-page: 1555 year: 2006 end-page: 1565 article-title: Impact of puma predation on the decline and recovery of a mule deer population in southeastern Idaho publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 17 start-page: 166 year: 2010 end-page: 174 article-title: Roe deer population growth and lynx predation along a gradient of environmental productivity and climate in Norway publication-title: Ecoscience – volume: 4 start-page: 179 year: 1966 end-page: 205 article-title: Seasonal periodicity in theoretical population ecology publication-title: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability – volume: 18 start-page: 1 year: 1949 end-page: 35 article-title: The natural control of animal population publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 273 start-page: 1537 year: 2006 end-page: 1543 article-title: Stochastic predation events and population persistence in bighorn sheep publication-title: Proceedings of the Royal Society, Biological Sciences – volume: 64 start-page: 698 year: 2000 end-page: 706 article-title: Irruptive potential in roe deer: density dependent effects on rate of increase and fecundity publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 72 start-page: 99 year: 2008 end-page: 106 article-title: Cougar prey selection in a white‐tailed deer and mule deer community publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 71 start-page: 1993 year: 2007 end-page: 1997 article-title: Predation on moose calves by European brown bears publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 4 start-page: 147 year: 1998 end-page: 158 article-title: The diet of brown bears in central Scandinavia: effects of access to free‐ranging domestic sheep publication-title: Wildlife Biology – volume: 8 start-page: 157 year: 2001 end-page: 163 article-title: Age specific moose (Alces alces) mortality in a predator‐free environment: evidence for senescence in females publication-title: Ecoscience – volume: 74 start-page: 742 year: 2005 end-page: 754 article-title: Ageing and reproductive effort in male moose under variable levels of intrasexual competition publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 31 start-page: 933 year: 2003 end-page: 946 article-title: Development and application of a ratio estimator to estimate wolf kill rates and variance in a multiple‐prey system publication-title: Wildlife Society Bulletin – volume: 52 start-page: 153 year: 2006 end-page: 163 article-title: Patterns of hunting mortality in Norwegian moose ( ) populations publication-title: European Journal of Wildlife Research – volume: 76 start-page: 1037 year: 2007 end-page: 1044 article-title: The anatomy of predator‐prey dynamics in a changing climate publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 42 start-page: 389 year: 2005 end-page: 399 article-title: Moose harvesting strategies in the presence of wolves publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology – volume: 33 start-page: 914 year: 2005 end-page: 925 article-title: Using GPS technology and GIS cluster analyses to estimate kill rates in wolf—ungulate ecosystems publication-title: Wildlife Society Bulletin – volume: 166 start-page: 119 year: 2005 end-page: 123 article-title: Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life‐history variation among mammalian populations publication-title: American Naturalist – year: 2008 – volume: 133 start-page: 36 year: 1995 end-page: 43 article-title: Analysis of coyote predation on deer and elk during winter in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming publication-title: American Midland Naturalist – volume: 80 start-page: 244 year: 2011 end-page: 258 article-title: Is hunting mortality additive or compensatory to natural mortality? Effects of experimental harvest on the survival and cause‐specific mortality of willow ptarmigan publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 75 start-page: 1940 year: 1997 end-page: 1944 article-title: Is wolf predation ratio‐dependent? publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 78 start-page: 741 year: 2009b end-page: 751 article-title: Climate, season, and social status modulate the functional response of an efficient stalking predator: the Eurasian lynx publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 70 start-page: 1070 year: 2006 end-page: 1078 article-title: Selection of Northern Yellowstone elk by gray wolves and hunters publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 23 start-page: 889 year: 2008a end-page: 896 article-title: Evaluation of the importance of roe deer fawns in the spring‐summer diet of red foxes in southeastern Norway publication-title: Ecological Research – volume: 70 start-page: 9 year: 1994 end-page: 17 article-title: Size, trend, distribution, conservation of the brown bear population in Sweden publication-title: Biological Conservation – volume: 87 start-page: 2411 year: 2006 end-page: 2417 article-title: Consumer‐resource body‐size relationships in natural food webs publication-title: Ecology – volume: 156 start-page: 53 year: 2008 end-page: 64 article-title: Summer kill rates and predation pattern in a wolf‐moose system: can we rely on winter estimates? publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 9 start-page: 10 year: 1999 end-page: 16 article-title: Wolf‐moose interaction on Isle Royale: the end of natural regulation? publication-title: Ecological Applications – volume: 87 start-page: 2238 year: 2006 end-page: 2348 article-title: Transient population dynamics in periodic matrix models: methodology and effects of cyclic permutation publication-title: Ecology – volume: 85 start-page: 1453 year: 2004 end-page: 1459 article-title: Interaction of top‐down and bottom‐up life history trade‐offs in moose ( ) publication-title: Ecology – volume: 78 start-page: 585 year: 2009a end-page: 594 article-title: A slow life in hell or a fast life in heaven: demographic analyses of contrasting roe deer populations publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – volume: 79 start-page: 710 year: 2001 end-page: 725 article-title: The recovery, distribution and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978‐1998 publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 45 start-page: 1142 year: 2010 end-page: 1154 article-title: Sustainably harvesting a large carnivore? Development of Eurasian lynx populations in Norway during 160 years of shifting policy publication-title: Environmental Management – volume: 86 start-page: 116 year: 2008b end-page: 126 article-title: When a generalist becomes a specialist: patterns of red fox predation on roe deer fawns under contrasting conditions publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 65 start-page: 503 year: 1985 end-page: 512 article-title: Moose ( ) and wolf ( ) dynamics and the natural regulation of moose populations publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 13 start-page: 467 year: 2007 end-page: 474 article-title: Selectivity of Eurasian lynx and recreational hunters for age, sex and body condition in roe deer publication-title: Wildlife Biology – volume: 15 start-page: 337 year: 2000 end-page: 341 article-title: The nature of predation: prey dependent, ratio dependent or neither? publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution – volume: 71 start-page: 1098 year: 2007 end-page: 1106 article-title: Comparative patterns of predation by cougars and recolonizing wolves in Montana’s Madison Range publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – start-page: 283 year: 1989 end-page: 301 – volume: 120 start-page: 1 year: 1992 end-page: 59 article-title: The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation publication-title: Wildlife Monographs – year: 2002 – volume: 18 start-page: 724 year: 2009 end-page: 734 article-title: Predation has a greater impact in less productive environments: variation in roe deer, , population density across Europe publication-title: Global Ecology and Biogeography – volume: 31 start-page: 367 year: 2000 end-page: 393 article-title: Temporal variation in fitness components and population dynamics of large herbivores publication-title: Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics – volume: 75 start-page: 478 year: 1994 end-page: 488 article-title: Ungulate population models with predation: a case study with the North American moose publication-title: Ecology – volume: 425 start-page: 288 year: 2003 end-page: 290 article-title: Patterns of predation in a diverse predator – prey system publication-title: Nature – volume: 56 start-page: 116 year: 1992 end-page: 127 article-title: Predation and moose population dynamics: a critique publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 273 start-page: 1421 year: 2006 end-page: 1427 article-title: Cross‐continental differences in patterns of predation: will naïve moose in Scandinavia ever learn? publication-title: Proceeding of the Royal Society, Biological Science – volume: 5 start-page: 177 year: 1999 end-page: 185 article-title: Hunter observations as an index of moose population parameters publication-title: Wildlife Biology – volume: 54 start-page: 1 year: 1987 end-page: 54 article-title: Ecology of an exploited wolf population in south‐central Alaska publication-title: Wildlife Monographs – volume: 42 start-page: 1 year: 2011 end-page: 27 article-title: Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator‐prey interactions publication-title: Mammal Review – volume: 75 start-page: 1299 year: 1994 end-page: 1303 article-title: Sensitivity analysis of periodic matrix models publication-title: Ecology – volume: 24 start-page: 1197 year: 2009 end-page: 1205 article-title: Who wants to live forever? roe deer survival in a favourable environment publication-title: Ecological Research – volume: 78 start-page: 60 year: 2000 end-page: 66 article-title: Wolf functional response and regulation of moose in the Yukon publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology – volume: 3 start-page: 28 year: 1997 end-page: 40 article-title: Wolf Canis lupus predation on moose Alces alces and roe deer in south‐central Scandinavia publication-title: Wildlife Biology – volume: 22 start-page: 1 year: 2007 end-page: 23 article-title: Estimating and analyzing demographic models using the popbio package in R publication-title: Journal of Statistical Software – volume: 60 start-page: 474 year: 1996 end-page: 489 article-title: Increases in moose, caribou, and wolves following wolf control in Alaska publication-title: Journal of Wildlife Management – volume: 77 start-page: 173 year: 2008 end-page: 183 article-title: Predator – prey size relationships in an African large‐mammal food web publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology – ident: e_1_2_6_37_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01276.x – volume-title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing year: 2008 ident: e_1_2_6_49_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_2_1 doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01908-X – ident: e_1_2_6_8_1 doi: 10.2307/3808799 – ident: e_1_2_6_46_1 doi: 10.1007/s11284-007-0452-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_67_1 doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1070:SONYEB]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_39_1 doi: 10.1007/s10344-005-0023-1 – ident: e_1_2_6_62_1 doi: 10.2307/3802519 – ident: e_1_2_6_30_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00480.x – ident: e_1_2_6_42_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01547.x – ident: e_1_2_6_4_1 doi: 10.2981/0909-6396(2007)13[467:SOELLL]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_45_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01314.x – ident: e_1_2_6_13_1 doi: 10.2193/2007-060 – ident: e_1_2_6_29_1 doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9455-9 – ident: e_1_2_6_32_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2338:TPDIPM]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_7_1 doi: 10.2307/3802065 – ident: e_1_2_6_38_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.00965.x – ident: e_1_2_6_27_1 doi: 10.1139/Z06-150 – ident: e_1_2_6_23_1 doi: 10.2307/2426345 – ident: e_1_2_6_25_1 doi: 10.1139/z99-188 – volume: 79 start-page: 710 year: 2001 ident: e_1_2_6_65_1 article-title: The recovery, distribution and population dynamics of wolves on the Scandinavian peninsula, 1978‐1998 publication-title: Canadian Journal of Zoology doi: 10.1139/z01-029 – ident: e_1_2_6_33_1 doi: 10.2307/1939551 – volume: 3 start-page: 28 year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_6_44_1 article-title: Wolf Canis lupus predation on moose Alces alces and roe deer Capreolus capreolus in south‐central Scandinavia publication-title: Wildlife Biology doi: 10.2981/wlb.1997.003 – ident: e_1_2_6_9_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2411:CBRINF]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_53_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01769.x – ident: e_1_2_6_52_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-0969-2 – ident: e_1_2_6_17_1 doi: 10.1080/11956860.2001.11682641 – ident: e_1_2_6_63_1 doi: 10.2193/2006-308 – ident: e_1_2_6_19_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3467 – ident: e_1_2_6_18_1 doi: 10.1007/s11284-008-0525-x – volume: 54 start-page: 1 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_6_6_1 article-title: Ecology of an exploited wolf population in south‐central Alaska publication-title: Wildlife Monographs – ident: e_1_2_6_61_1 doi: 10.1016/0006-3207(94)90293-3 – ident: e_1_2_6_31_1 doi: 10.2980/17-2-3314 – volume: 39 start-page: 109 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_28_1 article-title: Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia publication-title: Alces – ident: e_1_2_6_40_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01018.x – ident: e_1_2_6_60_1 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_11 – ident: e_1_2_6_11_1 doi: 10.2307/1937455 – volume: 31 start-page: 933 year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_6_26_1 article-title: Development and application of a ratio estimator to estimate wolf kill rates and variance in a multiple‐prey system publication-title: Wildlife Society Bulletin – ident: e_1_2_6_41_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01523.x – ident: e_1_2_6_34_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00379664 – ident: e_1_2_6_5_1 doi: 10.2193/2006-102 – ident: e_1_2_6_66_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01289.x – ident: e_1_2_6_20_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 – volume: 120 start-page: 1 year: 1992 ident: e_1_2_6_22_1 article-title: The role of predation in limiting moose at low densities in Alaska and Yukon and implications for conservation publication-title: Wildlife Monographs – ident: e_1_2_6_48_1 doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0010:WMIOIR]2.0.CO;2 – volume: 4 start-page: 179 year: 1966 ident: e_1_2_6_56_1 article-title: Seasonal periodicity in theoretical population ecology publication-title: Proceedings of the 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability – ident: e_1_2_6_58_1 doi: 10.2307/1578 – ident: e_1_2_6_16_1 doi: 10.2981/wlb.1999.022 – ident: e_1_2_6_59_1 doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i11 – ident: e_1_2_6_57_1 doi: 10.2307/3545248 – ident: e_1_2_6_35_1 doi: 10.2981/wlb.2002.015 – ident: e_1_2_6_64_1 doi: 10.1890/02-0672 – ident: e_1_2_6_21_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.1990.3010139.x – ident: e_1_2_6_47_1 doi: 10.1139/Z07-120 – ident: e_1_2_6_50_1 doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2005)33[914:UGTAGC]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_6_3_1 doi: 10.2307/3802739 – ident: e_1_2_6_12_1 doi: 10.1007/s11284-009-0600-y – ident: e_1_2_6_43_1 doi: 10.1007/s10344-006-0052-4 – ident: e_1_2_6_10_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2003.09.007 – volume-title: Wildlife Demography: Analysis of Sex, Age, and Count Data year: 2005 ident: e_1_2_6_55_1 – ident: e_1_2_6_14_1 doi: 10.2981/wlb.1998.017 – ident: e_1_2_6_15_1 doi: 10.1139/z97-824 – volume: 42 start-page: 1 year: 2011 ident: e_1_2_6_24_1 article-title: Habitat heterogeneity and mammalian predator‐prey interactions publication-title: Mammal Review – ident: e_1_2_6_54_1 doi: 10.1038/nature01934 – ident: e_1_2_6_51_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3447 – volume-title: Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis year: 2002 ident: e_1_2_6_36_1 |
| SSID | ssj0007203 |
| Score | 2.345014 |
| Snippet | 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex... Summary 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the... 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex... Summary 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the... 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex... 1.Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex... 1. Understanding the role of predation in shaping the dynamics of animal communities is a fundamental issue in ecological research. Nevertheless, the complex... |
| SourceID | swepub pubmedcentral proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley jstor |
| SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 443 |
| SubjectTerms | Age Age composition Age Distribution age structure Alces alces Animal and plant ecology animal communities Animal ecology Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Bears Biological and medical sciences Boreal forests Brown bears Canis lupus Capreolus capreolus Carnivora Carnivora - physiology Carnivores Community ecology Comparative analysis courser Deer Demography Ecological research Ecosystem Environmental Sciences related to Agriculture and Land-use Female Food Chain Forest ecosystems Forests Foxes Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Harvesting kill rate life history Lynx Lynx lynx Male Mammalia Mammals Miljö- och naturvårdsvetenskap Models, Biological Norway physiology Population Dynamics Population ecology Predation Predator-prey interactions predator-prey relationships Predators Predatory Behavior Prey Scandinavia Seasons Simulation Species Specificity stalker Sweden Ursus arctos Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution Vulpes vulpes Wildlife ecology Wolves |
| Title | Predicting the potential demographic impact of predators on their prey: a comparative analysis of two carnivore-ungulate systems in Scandinavia |
| URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41495988 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2656.2011.01928.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22077484 https://www.proquest.com/docview/921010693 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1449956360 https://www.proquest.com/docview/926888143 https://www.proquest.com/docview/928912223 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC3440569 https://res.slu.se/id/publ/60091 |
| Volume | 81 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Nb9QwELWgEhIXvguhsDIS4pZV4jgf5lahVlUlqgqoVHGxbMcRq7bJapMtlBN_AfEP-SXM2NksgYIqxGmtxJPdzHrGz_bzMyHPeSlUERkeauh-Qi7iBPIg12GaalPF3ArjFtpfH2R7R3z_OD3u-U-4F8brQwwTbhgZLl9jgCvdjoPcM7TSrFfiBLBSTBFP4g3ER2_WSlK42ujZHjEkABGNST2XPmjUU3myIjInVQvOq_ypF5fB0t_Zlb0G6Rj-uv5r9zY5Wb25p62cTJednprPv4hC_h_X3CG3ephLt327vEuu2foeueEPvryA0vvGle6Tr4cLXCpC8jUFLErnTYf8JbAt7ZmX054Z6vdy0qaic6iO8wQtbWrqVjnw0sVLqqhZC5lT1WutoEn3saEGJ4DOm4X9_uUbpDc8s8xSr2Ld0llN3xq3vUedz9QDcrS78-7VXtgfExEaeMEiVDbXWleRYKWNmTZGWK5KCzhWQ-8MADRKWSWUKHgZWW6YjkurVc6YTnmiWZZsko26qe0jQjXTJQAoeE6ZcFFZUUVVLqyuWJ5ZFomA5KsmIU2voY5HeZzKn8ZS4HqJrpfoeulcLz8FJB4s515H5Ao2m67VDQYch7OiKAIyGTXDoQLqyUGCZQHZWrVL2eekVgoY3cdRJpKAPBvuQjLBFSJV22bZwjiQ407nJIsCQv9QR7CsKAqA2X-rUogYgWdAHvpYWP9CFuUoXwueHEXJUAHlzsd36tkHJ3uecBhcZPAfvPDxNDJpT5daLfBDtlYCihcxfIULkiv7W-5vH-xg8fE_W26Rm3CdeZLiE7LRLZb2KaDWTk_IdcYPJy4r_QBu0o4E |
| linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3NbtQwELZKEYIL_4VQKEYCbrtKHOfHSBwq2mr7t0LQShUXEzuOWFGS1Wa37XLiFRCPw6tw4kmYibNZAgVVSD1wipXMJJHHM56xx98Q8pinIoldzTsKpp8OF54PdpCrThAonXncCF1ttO_2w94-3zoIDhbI19lZGIsP0Sy4oWZU9hoVHBek21puU7SCsIbiBG8l7p7UGZbbZnoM8Vv5fHMNhP2EsY31vRe9Tl1ioKOBLe4kJlJKZa5gqfGY0loYnqQGfCAFlh2cFzdgmUhEzFPXcM2UlxqVRIypgPuKhT689wK5iAXFEbh_7dUcuwr3N21-iQcmR7jtNKJT_7w1N9r0SMzVTEoQV2brbJzmCP-ez1mjnrYd7mrG3LhGvs362ibKvO9OxqqrP_4CQ_mfCuM6uVp78nTVqt4NsmDym-SSre05hdabomrdIp9fjnA3DPPLKbjbdFiMMUULeFPzwSKGDzS1x1VpkdEhkONSSEmLnFYbOXhr-owmVM-x2mlSw8kgy_i4oBrXuI6Kkfn-6QtYcCzLZqgF6i7pIKevdXWCKTkaJLfJ_rn0zBJZzIvc3CVUMZWCjwjvSX0uMiMyN4uEURmLQsNc4ZBoNgalrmHisVrJofwpXARRSxS1RFHLStTyxCFewzm0UCln4FmqhnnDwDFiF3HskJXWuG8IEDIP5hDmkOWZIsja7JZSMA_XOITvkEfNU7CXuAmW5KaYlBDqcjzM7YeuQ-gfaAQL4ziGSOJvJLHw0Ld2yB2rfPM_ZG6ECL3Qky21bAgQ0b39JB-8q5DdfQ7xUwgyeGoVuMVSHk5UMsKLLI2EQEV48IlKK8_c33Jrtb-OzXv_zPmQXO7t7e7Inc3-9jK5AjTM5mTeJ4vj0cQ8ACd9rFYqY0jJ2_NW-B9TCOxx |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3NbtQwELZKEYgL4q8QCsVIwC0ocZwfI3GoaFf9gdVKUKniYmzHESuVZLXZbbs3XgHxNjwOT8JMnE2JKKhC6mmtjSeJMuPxN57xZ0Ke8VyoLDDc1zD9-FyEEfhBrv041qYIuRWmSbS_GyY7B3zvMD5cIT-We2EcP0S34IYjo_HXOMAnedEf5K5CK05aJk4AK9nL07bAct8uTiB8q1_vboGunzM22P7wZsdvTxjwDYhlvrKp1roIBMttyLQxwnKVW4BAGhw7YJcgZoVQIuN5YLlhOsytViljOuaRZkkE971CrmKuEcvJGB91swCmN115SQgeRwT9KqJz37w3NbrqSCzVVDVoq3DHbJyHg_8s52xJT_t4u5kwB7fIzRbp0k1nmrfJii3vkGvu7MsFtD5WTesu-TaaYrYI668pwFE6qWZYwgSyuf3iGLXHhrrtnLQq6AS641JBTauSNokO_GvxiipqzrjMqWrpVlBkdlJRg2tAx9XU_vz6HTwcHltmqSOyrum4pO9Ns8NHHY_VPXJwKXpcI6tlVdoHhGqmc8BQcJ884qKwogiKVFhdsDSxLBAeSZdKkqalUcfTPI7kb-EUqFeieiWqVzbqlaceCTvJiaMSuYDMWmMHnQDHiFZkmUc2eobRdUBKOfCxzCPrS0uRrVuqpYAAPwwSEXnkaXcV_AkmiVRpq3kNoSDHzc5REniE_qWPYEmWZYC0_9UlEyFiT4_cd9Z59oYsSJHBFr5kz267Dsh43r9Sjj83zOcRh_giAR28cBbeE6mP5lpN8UfWVgKQFyE8ohkBF_7ecm9zuI3Nh_8t-YRcH20N5Nvd4f46uQFdmCtZfERWZ9O5fQwYdqY3GmdByafL9k6_AFJqp6Y |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predicting+the+potential+demographic+impact+of+predators+on+their+prey%3A+a+comparative+analysis+of+two+carnivore%E2%80%93ungulate+systems+in+Scandinavia&rft.jtitle=The+Journal+of+animal+ecology&rft.au=Gervasi%2C+Vincenzo&rft.au=Nilsen%2C+Erlend+B.&rft.au=Sand%2C+H%C3%A5kan&rft.au=Panzacchi%2C+Manuela&rft.date=2012-03-01&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=443&rft.epage=454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2656.2011.01928.x&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1111_j_1365_2656_2011_01928_x |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0021-8790&client=summon |