Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I–III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy...
Saved in:
Published in | Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 111 - 120 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
01.01.2022
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1341-1098 2186-1005 2186-1005 |
DOI | 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis. Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world. Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.PURPOSEImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.METHODSA total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.RESULTSThere was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.CONCLUSIONNeoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world. A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis. |
ArticleNumber | oa.21-00143 |
Author | Zhang, Zhenfa Liu, Zuo Jiang, Shuai Zhang, Mengzhe Gong, Jialin Wang, Xiaofei Gao, Zhaoming |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Gong, Jialin organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Jiang, Shuai organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Zhang, Mengzhe organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Wang, Xiaofei organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Gao, Zhaoming organization: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Binzhou People’s Hospital, Binzhou, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Zhang, Zhenfa organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China – sequence: 1 fullname: Liu, Zuo organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ksGO0zAQhiO0iO0u3DkhH7lksR0ndi5Iq2oLkaoFsSCOluNOWleOXWynq954Bx6Dt-JJSGmpFpC4jC3P98-MPP9Fdua8gyx7TvBVySvySiUdr7y6oiTHmLDiUTahRFQ5wbg8yyakYGS81-I8u4hxjXEhqgo_yc4LxnnFynqSff8AyuaffbALdNN1oJPZgoMYkXIL9D74pfMxGY1mSicfIrp2yu6iich36C6pJUTU_Pj6rWkadOtdftcra9EUxjAf3BJNldMQ0Mxb6-_N-HALXi3Ww1a5hKYr6H3e9P3gfFpBUJsd8uFf5Jh7mj3ulI3w7HheZp9mNx-nb_P5uzfN9Hqe64qJlHctqTtglOq2pozRUmDdUtF1rSorTbuKCFZw4MCKUmjCeKtVPSK8bIFroovL7PWh7mZoe1hocCkoKzfB9CrspFdG_plxZiWXfitrLAir-Fjg5bFA8F8GiEn2JurxT5QDP0RJy5oLihkXI_riYa9Tk98bGgF8AHTwMQboTgjBcm8CuTfBOJSkRP4ywSip_pJok1Qyfj-tsf8Tzg7Cddxv9tRJhdEBFg4CKiTdhwfCE6BXKkhwxU-HLtc5 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1186_s13019_024_02955_w crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_4889 crossref_primary_10_1183_20734735_0044_2024 crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1273220 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1145303 crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000496 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1200625 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14123_w crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1500593 crossref_primary_10_5937_jomb0_39798 crossref_primary_10_1093_icvts_ivae213 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1276549 crossref_primary_10_1093_ejcts_ezae110 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62159-5 10.1093/ejcts/ezz044 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231 10.1093/jjco/hyx147 10.21037/atm-21-670 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.014 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30365-9 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003 10.1016/S1556-0864(15)30371-3 10.1056/NEJMoa1716078 10.3390/cancers12123572 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7810 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.014 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.028 10.1007/s11748-019-01076-9 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8509 10.1007/s11912-020-00969-w 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.017 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa290 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.109 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.003 10.1055/s-0039-1679884 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e15125 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2022 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2022 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery – notice: 2022 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Liu Z, et al |
EISSN | 2186-1005 |
EndPage | 120 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC9081467 34776459 10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143 article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- .55 23M 2WC 3O- 53G 5GY 6J9 7.U ACGFO ADBBV AENEX AIAGR ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL C1A DIK E3Z EBS EJD EMOBN F5P GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HYE JSF JSH KQ8 OK1 P2P RJT RPM RZJ SJN SV3 TKC TR2 X7M ZJWQK AAYXX CITATION RIG CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-fb19fe422cb92442580cb28ffba56c2f618437e7e4358c147bca90cb75be7c1c3 |
ISSN | 1341-1098 2186-1005 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:25:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 11:03:00 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:54:09 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 08:08:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:51:22 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:30:34 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 2 |
Keywords | non-small cell lung cancer real-world effectiveness immune checkpoint inhibitor prognostic factor retrospective study |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivatives International License |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c648t-fb19fe422cb92442580cb28ffba56c2f618437e7e4358c147bca90cb75be7c1c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Email: zhangzhenfa@tmu.edu.cn |
OpenAccessLink | http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143 |
PMID | 34776459 |
PQID | 2597820478 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9081467 proquest_miscellaneous_2597820478 pubmed_primary_34776459 crossref_primary_10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143 crossref_citationtrail_10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143 jstage_primary_article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2022-01-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2022-01-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2022 text: 2022-01-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan |
PublicationTitle | Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
PublicationTitleAlternate | ATCS |
PublicationYear | 2022 |
Publisher | The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery |
References | 17) Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–47. 25) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Vaporciyan AA, et al. Agreement on major pathological response in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 341–8. 15) Xu JM, Jia R, Wang Y, et al. A first-in-human phase 1a trial of sintilimab (IBI308), a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1), in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: e15125. 21) Kayawake H, Okumura N, Yamanashi K, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer with pathological complete response: predictive factors and surgical outcomes. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 773–81. 14) Zhou C, Chen G, Huang Y, et al. Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 305–14. 11) Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1976–86. 26) Schreiner W, Dudek W, Rieker RJ, et al. Major pathologic response after induction therapy has a long-term impact on survival and tumor recurrence in stage IIIA/B locally advanced NSCLC. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68: 639–45. 27) Lococo F, Sassorossi C, Nachira D, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in locally advanced NSCLC with pathological complete response after surgical resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 3572. 2) Watanabe SI, Nakagawa K, Suzuki K, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 1112–8. 29) Corsini EM, Weissferdt A, Pataer A, et al. Pathological nodal disease defines survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer with tumour major pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 100–8. 9) Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2288–301. 7) Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2020–31. 10) Gao S, Li N, Gao S, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 816–26. 4) NSCLC Meta-analysis Collaborative Group. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014; 383: 1561–71. 8) Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2040–51. 1) Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424. 28) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Disease-free survival among patients with ypN0 (blue), ypN1 (yellow) and ypN2 (gray) disease (P <0.0001). B. Disease-free survival among patients who achieved pathological complete response or major pathological response (pCR + MPR, blue) in comparison to those with residual disease (non-MPR, yellow) (P <0.0001). Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56. 23) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Factors associated with survival in complete pathologic response non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56. 6) Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–92. 20) Provencio M, Nadal E, Insa A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II multicenter exploratory study—final data of patients who underwent surgical assessment. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 8509. 3) Burdett S, Stewart LA, Rydzewska L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1: 611–21. 12) Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39–51. 5) Gentzler RD, Riley DO, Martin LW. Striving toward Improved outcomes for surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: the promise and challenges of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22: 109. 30) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Swisher SG, et al. Controversies and challenges in the pathologic examination of lung resection specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Lung Cancer 2021; 154: 76–83. 16) Wang J, Li J, Cai L, et al. The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant programmed death 1 inhibitor therapy with surgical resection in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 486. 22) Friedel G, Budach W, Dippon J, et al. Phase II trial of a trimodality regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer using chemotherapy as induction treatment with concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by subsequent resection: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 942–8. 13) Yang Y, Wang Z, Fang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (Oncology pRogram by InnovENT anti-PD-1-11). J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 1636–46. 18) Melek H, Çetinkaya G, Özer E, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant/induction treatment: where is its place in the lung cancer staging system? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56: 604–11. 24) Morita R, Okishio K, Shimizu J, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study in Japan. Lung Cancer 2020; 140: 8–18. 19) Lococo F, Cesario A, Margaritora S, et al. Induction therapy followed by surgery for T3-T4/N0 non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1633–40. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 21 |
References_xml | – reference: 5) Gentzler RD, Riley DO, Martin LW. Striving toward Improved outcomes for surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: the promise and challenges of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22: 109. – reference: 22) Friedel G, Budach W, Dippon J, et al. Phase II trial of a trimodality regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer using chemotherapy as induction treatment with concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by subsequent resection: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 942–8. – reference: 4) NSCLC Meta-analysis Collaborative Group. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014; 383: 1561–71. – reference: 13) Yang Y, Wang Z, Fang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (Oncology pRogram by InnovENT anti-PD-1-11). J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 1636–46. – reference: 12) Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39–51. – reference: 28) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Disease-free survival among patients with ypN0 (blue), ypN1 (yellow) and ypN2 (gray) disease (P <0.0001). B. Disease-free survival among patients who achieved pathological complete response or major pathological response (pCR + MPR, blue) in comparison to those with residual disease (non-MPR, yellow) (P <0.0001). Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56. – reference: 21) Kayawake H, Okumura N, Yamanashi K, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer with pathological complete response: predictive factors and surgical outcomes. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 773–81. – reference: 23) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Factors associated with survival in complete pathologic response non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56. – reference: 30) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Swisher SG, et al. Controversies and challenges in the pathologic examination of lung resection specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Lung Cancer 2021; 154: 76–83. – reference: 15) Xu JM, Jia R, Wang Y, et al. A first-in-human phase 1a trial of sintilimab (IBI308), a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1), in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: e15125. – reference: 16) Wang J, Li J, Cai L, et al. The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant programmed death 1 inhibitor therapy with surgical resection in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 486. – reference: 9) Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2288–301. – reference: 6) Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–92. – reference: 8) Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2040–51. – reference: 7) Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2020–31. – reference: 11) Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1976–86. – reference: 20) Provencio M, Nadal E, Insa A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II multicenter exploratory study—final data of patients who underwent surgical assessment. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 8509. – reference: 1) Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424. – reference: 26) Schreiner W, Dudek W, Rieker RJ, et al. Major pathologic response after induction therapy has a long-term impact on survival and tumor recurrence in stage IIIA/B locally advanced NSCLC. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68: 639–45. – reference: 25) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Vaporciyan AA, et al. Agreement on major pathological response in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 341–8. – reference: 29) Corsini EM, Weissferdt A, Pataer A, et al. Pathological nodal disease defines survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer with tumour major pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 100–8. – reference: 2) Watanabe SI, Nakagawa K, Suzuki K, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 1112–8. – reference: 14) Zhou C, Chen G, Huang Y, et al. Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 305–14. – reference: 18) Melek H, Çetinkaya G, Özer E, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant/induction treatment: where is its place in the lung cancer staging system? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56: 604–11. – reference: 3) Burdett S, Stewart LA, Rydzewska L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1: 611–21. – reference: 19) Lococo F, Cesario A, Margaritora S, et al. Induction therapy followed by surgery for T3-T4/N0 non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1633–40. – reference: 27) Lococo F, Sassorossi C, Nachira D, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in locally advanced NSCLC with pathological complete response after surgical resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 3572. – reference: 17) Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–47. – reference: 24) Morita R, Okishio K, Shimizu J, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study in Japan. Lung Cancer 2020; 140: 8–18. – reference: 10) Gao S, Li N, Gao S, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 816–26. – ident: 17 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62159-5 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz044 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx147 – ident: 16 doi: 10.21037/atm-21-670 – ident: 24 doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.014 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30365-9 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003 – ident: 3 doi: 10.1016/S1556-0864(15)30371-3 – ident: 11 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716078 – ident: 28 doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003 – ident: 27 doi: 10.3390/cancers12123572 – ident: 22 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7810 – ident: 30 doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.014 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.028 – ident: 21 doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01076-9 – ident: 20 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8509 – ident: 5 doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00969-w – ident: 10 doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.017 – ident: 29 doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa290 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.109 – ident: 25 doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.003 – ident: 26 doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679884 – ident: 9 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948 – ident: 1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e15125 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009 |
SSID | ssj0038660 |
Score | 2.3425195 |
Snippet | Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the... Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref jstage |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 111 |
SubjectTerms | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy Humans immune checkpoint inhibitor Immunotherapy - adverse effects Lung Neoplasms Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects Neoplasm Staging non-small cell lung cancer Original Prognosis prognostic factor real-world effectiveness retrospective study Treatment Outcome |
Title | Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I–III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/atcs/28/2/28_oa.21-00143/_article/-char/en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776459 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2597820478 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9081467 |
Volume | 28 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2022, Vol.28(2), pp.111-120 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NjtMwELZ2Fw5cEIi_8icjcUFVuo3z4-SEUNlqg9Ae2K7UW-S4jpoVTVA3EWJPvAOPwVvxJMzETpo2K0ThErWOkzqd-TKe8cxnQl7LVPHUcZilFkpYbiASS7BFarkueG6LNJCOqrMtzvzTC_fD3JsfHL7vZC1VZTKS1zfWlfyLVKEN5IpVsntItr0pNMBnkC8cQcJw_CsZf4JZnqXTYTQLcfPqMiUAmESHhKxTs6lOl4EEZplI7xA12Q5OFEXDsyK3zle4Wj3BmN7HCpMCUC_WwykoTPEVAwtnqhCLywqm4OUQ-QYKK8IiE1PK9Q0z3Htdyg55QY-6ebYEPZSGOHaynSB73inbrmn8TQYx_LlZq9fwzUS9l5XIerFwzNy9Xm4WoUzzPBNFqrJu3IOxnbgHouhkkSGTSh1lWa2yslR1nGX_8et3Pxh0sEp6U-yRqttwxy5oG3tdg8GCDjBY5-3f2A09kbDrKr-ejQIHD20UGNqrUSFGDJ4KORY39rjNkjR6FWPXmAUxw0MhYmbH9SVx0wEL9AAPh-QWA2dp3AQW9HzECXxTK28eTy_W4zCOdwexNTm7fXlV1sQTfddrN4O4MyWb3SN3jS9F3-nx3ScHKn9Afm5AQbdAQUE6dAMKakBBG1DQIqUaFDT69f0HwIG2cKAIB4pwoBoOtIUD7eg6vQEOtFj3u5hzD8nF9GQ2ObXMjiSW9N2gtNLEDlPlMiaTEObFzAvGMmFBmibC8yVL692TuOIKnJBA2i5PpAihC_cSxaUtnUfkKC9y9YRQ3_fAmgaOH8KdfOElHg8T23UdmXgOeDUDctyIIpaGrh93jfkcg9uOwtNq0VGHAXnTXvFFU9X8oe9bLd22577KNiCvGrWIwSLhMqPIVVHBxV6IJJwuDwbksVaT9lccl3OkrxoQvqVAbQdku98-k2fLmvU-HONqBX_63yN_Ru5s3ifPyVG5rtQL8CzK5GUNnN_GfDWo |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-World+Effectiveness+and+Prognostic+Factors+Analysis+of+Stages+I%E2%80%93III+Non-Small+Cell+Lung+Cancer+Following+Neoadjuvant+Chemo-Immunotherapy+or+Neoadjuvant+Chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+Thoracic+and+Cardiovascular+Surgery&rft.au=Gong%2C+Jialin&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Shuai&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Mengzhe&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiaofei&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.pub=The+Editorial+Committee+of+Annals+of+Thoracic+and+Cardiovascular+Surgery&rft.issn=1341-1098&rft.eissn=2186-1005&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=120&rft_id=info:doi/10.5761%2Fatcs.oa.21-00143&rft.externalDocID=article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon |