Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I–III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnnals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Vol. 28; no. 2; pp. 111 - 120
Main Authors Gong, Jialin, Jiang, Shuai, Zhang, Mengzhe, Wang, Xiaofei, Gao, Zhaoming, Zhang, Zhenfa, Liu, Zuo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 01.01.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1341-1098
2186-1005
2186-1005
DOI10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.
AbstractList Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test.Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world. Methods: A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan–Meier method and compared using log-rank test. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.PURPOSEImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world.A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.METHODSA total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.RESULTSThere was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS.Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.CONCLUSIONNeoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of ICIs and prognostic factors in patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant therapy in the real world. A total of 170 consecutive patients were finally selected and divided into two groups: the preoperative chemotherapy group (n = 91) and the chemo-immunotherapy group (n = 79). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary endpoints were pathological response, clinical response, pathological nodal disease, and ability of multivariate Cox regression analysis to predict survival. Survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test. There was a statistically significant difference in DFS between the two groups (log-rank test, P = 0.019). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that maximum tumor diameter (P = 0.016), higher lymph node stage (ypN1, P = 0.016; ypN2, P <0.001), and major pathological response not achieved (non-major pathological response [MPR], P = 0.011) were independent prognostic factors for worse DFS. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy yields better effects in pathological and clinical response than chemotherapy alone, which is also associated with longer DFS in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. Moreover, a larger tumor specimen diameter, higher ypN staging, and non-MPR after neoadjuvant therapy were associated with worse prognosis.
ArticleNumber oa.21-00143
Author Zhang, Zhenfa
Liu, Zuo
Jiang, Shuai
Zhang, Mengzhe
Gong, Jialin
Wang, Xiaofei
Gao, Zhaoming
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Gong, Jialin
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Jiang, Shuai
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Zhang, Mengzhe
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Wang, Xiaofei
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Gao, Zhaoming
  organization: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Binzhou People’s Hospital, Binzhou, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Zhang, Zhenfa
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Liu, Zuo
  organization: Department of Lung Cancer, Tianjin Lung Cancer Center, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776459$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ksGO0zAQhiO0iO0u3DkhH7lksR0ndi5Iq2oLkaoFsSCOluNOWleOXWynq954Bx6Dt-JJSGmpFpC4jC3P98-MPP9Fdua8gyx7TvBVySvySiUdr7y6oiTHmLDiUTahRFQ5wbg8yyakYGS81-I8u4hxjXEhqgo_yc4LxnnFynqSff8AyuaffbALdNN1oJPZgoMYkXIL9D74pfMxGY1mSicfIrp2yu6iich36C6pJUTU_Pj6rWkadOtdftcra9EUxjAf3BJNldMQ0Mxb6-_N-HALXi3Ww1a5hKYr6H3e9P3gfFpBUJsd8uFf5Jh7mj3ulI3w7HheZp9mNx-nb_P5uzfN9Hqe64qJlHctqTtglOq2pozRUmDdUtF1rSorTbuKCFZw4MCKUmjCeKtVPSK8bIFroovL7PWh7mZoe1hocCkoKzfB9CrspFdG_plxZiWXfitrLAir-Fjg5bFA8F8GiEn2JurxT5QDP0RJy5oLihkXI_riYa9Tk98bGgF8AHTwMQboTgjBcm8CuTfBOJSkRP4ywSip_pJok1Qyfj-tsf8Tzg7Cddxv9tRJhdEBFg4CKiTdhwfCE6BXKkhwxU-HLtc5
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s13019_024_02955_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_4889
crossref_primary_10_1183_20734735_0044_2024
crossref_primary_10_3389_fimmu_2023_1273220
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1145303
crossref_primary_10_1097_JS9_0000000000000496
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1200625
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_14123_w
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsurg_2024_1500593
crossref_primary_10_5937_jomb0_39798
crossref_primary_10_1093_icvts_ivae213
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2024_1276549
crossref_primary_10_1093_ejcts_ezae110
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62159-5
10.1093/ejcts/ezz044
10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
10.1056/NEJMoa1910231
10.1093/jjco/hyx147
10.21037/atm-21-670
10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.014
10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30365-9
10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003
10.1016/S1556-0864(15)30371-3
10.1056/NEJMoa1716078
10.3390/cancers12123572
10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7810
10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.014
10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.028
10.1007/s11748-019-01076-9
10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8509
10.1007/s11912-020-00969-w
10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.017
10.1093/ejcts/ezaa290
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.109
10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.003
10.1055/s-0039-1679884
10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
10.3322/caac.21492
10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e15125
10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2022 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
– notice: 2022 Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
DocumentTitleAlternate Liu Z, et al
EISSN 2186-1005
EndPage 120
ExternalDocumentID PMC9081467
34776459
10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143
article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
.55
23M
2WC
3O-
53G
5GY
6J9
7.U
ACGFO
ADBBV
AENEX
AIAGR
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
C1A
DIK
E3Z
EBS
EJD
EMOBN
F5P
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HYE
JSF
JSH
KQ8
OK1
P2P
RJT
RPM
RZJ
SJN
SV3
TKC
TR2
X7M
ZJWQK
AAYXX
CITATION
RIG
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-fb19fe422cb92442580cb28ffba56c2f618437e7e4358c147bca90cb75be7c1c3
ISSN 1341-1098
2186-1005
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:25:08 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 11:03:00 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:54:09 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 08:08:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:22 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:30:34 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 2
Keywords non-small cell lung cancer
real-world effectiveness
immune checkpoint inhibitor
prognostic factor
retrospective study
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NonDerivatives International License
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c648t-fb19fe422cb92442580cb28ffba56c2f618437e7e4358c147bca90cb75be7c1c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Email: zhangzhenfa@tmu.edu.cn
OpenAccessLink http://dx.doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00143
PMID 34776459
PQID 2597820478
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9081467
proquest_miscellaneous_2597820478
pubmed_primary_34776459
crossref_primary_10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143
crossref_citationtrail_10_5761_atcs_oa_21_00143
jstage_primary_article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
PublicationTitleAlternate ATCS
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Publisher_xml – name: The Editorial Committee of Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
References 17) Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–47.
25) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Vaporciyan AA, et al. Agreement on major pathological response in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 341–8.
15) Xu JM, Jia R, Wang Y, et al. A first-in-human phase 1a trial of sintilimab (IBI308), a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1), in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: e15125.
21) Kayawake H, Okumura N, Yamanashi K, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer with pathological complete response: predictive factors and surgical outcomes. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 773–81.
14) Zhou C, Chen G, Huang Y, et al. Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 305–14.
11) Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1976–86.
26) Schreiner W, Dudek W, Rieker RJ, et al. Major pathologic response after induction therapy has a long-term impact on survival and tumor recurrence in stage IIIA/B locally advanced NSCLC. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68: 639–45.
27) Lococo F, Sassorossi C, Nachira D, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in locally advanced NSCLC with pathological complete response after surgical resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 3572.
2) Watanabe SI, Nakagawa K, Suzuki K, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 1112–8.
29) Corsini EM, Weissferdt A, Pataer A, et al. Pathological nodal disease defines survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer with tumour major pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 100–8.
9) Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2288–301.
7) Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2020–31.
10) Gao S, Li N, Gao S, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 816–26.
4) NSCLC Meta-analysis Collaborative Group. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014; 383: 1561–71.
8) Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2040–51.
1) Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424.
28) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Disease-free survival among patients with ypN0 (blue), ypN1 (yellow) and ypN2 (gray) disease (P <0.0001). B. Disease-free survival among patients who achieved pathological complete response or major pathological response (pCR + MPR, blue) in comparison to those with residual disease (non-MPR, yellow) (P <0.0001). Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56.
23) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Factors associated with survival in complete pathologic response non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56.
6) Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–92.
20) Provencio M, Nadal E, Insa A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II multicenter exploratory study—final data of patients who underwent surgical assessment. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 8509.
3) Burdett S, Stewart LA, Rydzewska L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1: 611–21.
12) Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39–51.
5) Gentzler RD, Riley DO, Martin LW. Striving toward Improved outcomes for surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: the promise and challenges of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22: 109.
30) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Swisher SG, et al. Controversies and challenges in the pathologic examination of lung resection specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Lung Cancer 2021; 154: 76–83.
16) Wang J, Li J, Cai L, et al. The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant programmed death 1 inhibitor therapy with surgical resection in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 486.
22) Friedel G, Budach W, Dippon J, et al. Phase II trial of a trimodality regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer using chemotherapy as induction treatment with concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by subsequent resection: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 942–8.
13) Yang Y, Wang Z, Fang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (Oncology pRogram by InnovENT anti-PD-1-11). J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 1636–46.
18) Melek H, Çetinkaya G, Özer E, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant/induction treatment: where is its place in the lung cancer staging system? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56: 604–11.
24) Morita R, Okishio K, Shimizu J, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study in Japan. Lung Cancer 2020; 140: 8–18.
19) Lococo F, Cesario A, Margaritora S, et al. Induction therapy followed by surgery for T3-T4/N0 non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1633–40.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
References_xml – reference: 5) Gentzler RD, Riley DO, Martin LW. Striving toward Improved outcomes for surgically resectable non-small cell lung cancer: the promise and challenges of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Curr Oncol Rep 2020; 22: 109.
– reference: 22) Friedel G, Budach W, Dippon J, et al. Phase II trial of a trimodality regimen for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer using chemotherapy as induction treatment with concurrent hyperfractionated chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by subsequent resection: a single-center study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 942–8.
– reference: 4) NSCLC Meta-analysis Collaborative Group. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014; 383: 1561–71.
– reference: 13) Yang Y, Wang Z, Fang J, et al. Efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus pemetrexed and platinum as first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study (Oncology pRogram by InnovENT anti-PD-1-11). J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 1636–46.
– reference: 12) Goldstraw P, Chansky K, Crowley J, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: proposals for revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (Eighth) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 11: 39–51.
– reference: 28) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Disease-free survival among patients with ypN0 (blue), ypN1 (yellow) and ypN2 (gray) disease (P <0.0001). B. Disease-free survival among patients who achieved pathological complete response or major pathological response (pCR + MPR, blue) in comparison to those with residual disease (non-MPR, yellow) (P <0.0001). Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56.
– reference: 21) Kayawake H, Okumura N, Yamanashi K, et al. Non-small cell lung cancer with pathological complete response: predictive factors and surgical outcomes. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2019; 67: 773–81.
– reference: 23) Martinez-Meehan D, Lutfi W, Dhupar R, et al. Factors associated with survival in complete pathologic response non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 349–56.
– reference: 30) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Swisher SG, et al. Controversies and challenges in the pathologic examination of lung resection specimens after neoadjuvant treatment. Lung Cancer 2021; 154: 76–83.
– reference: 15) Xu JM, Jia R, Wang Y, et al. A first-in-human phase 1a trial of sintilimab (IBI308), a monoclonal antibody targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1), in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol 2018; 36: e15125.
– reference: 16) Wang J, Li J, Cai L, et al. The safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant programmed death 1 inhibitor therapy with surgical resection in stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Transl Med 2021; 9: 486.
– reference: 9) Socinski MA, Jotte RM, Cappuzzo F, et al. Atezolizumab for first-line treatment of metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2288–301.
– reference: 6) Gandhi L, Rodríguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 2078–92.
– reference: 8) Paz-Ares L, Luft A, Vicente D, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 2040–51.
– reference: 7) Hellmann MD, Paz-Ares L, Bernabe Caro R, et al. Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2019; 381: 2020–31.
– reference: 11) Forde PM, Chaft JE, Smith KN, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2018; 378: 1976–86.
– reference: 20) Provencio M, Nadal E, Insa A, et al. Neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy for the treatment of stage IIIA resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a phase II multicenter exploratory study—final data of patients who underwent surgical assessment. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 8509.
– reference: 1) Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394–424.
– reference: 26) Schreiner W, Dudek W, Rieker RJ, et al. Major pathologic response after induction therapy has a long-term impact on survival and tumor recurrence in stage IIIA/B locally advanced NSCLC. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 68: 639–45.
– reference: 25) Weissferdt A, Pataer A, Vaporciyan AA, et al. Agreement on major pathological response in NSCLC patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer 2020; 21: 341–8.
– reference: 29) Corsini EM, Weissferdt A, Pataer A, et al. Pathological nodal disease defines survival outcomes in patients with lung cancer with tumour major pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2021; 59: 100–8.
– reference: 2) Watanabe SI, Nakagawa K, Suzuki K, et al. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy for Stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47: 1112–8.
– reference: 14) Zhou C, Chen G, Huang Y, et al. Camrelizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed versus chemotherapy alone in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (CameL): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet Respir Med 2021; 9: 305–14.
– reference: 18) Melek H, Çetinkaya G, Özer E, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant/induction treatment: where is its place in the lung cancer staging system? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 56: 604–11.
– reference: 3) Burdett S, Stewart LA, Rydzewska L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature: chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2006; 1: 611–21.
– reference: 19) Lococo F, Cesario A, Margaritora S, et al. Induction therapy followed by surgery for T3-T4/N0 non-small cell lung cancer: long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 93: 1633–40.
– reference: 27) Lococo F, Sassorossi C, Nachira D, et al. Prognostic factors and long-term survival in locally advanced NSCLC with pathological complete response after surgical resection following neoadjuvant therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12: 3572.
– reference: 17) Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228–47.
– reference: 24) Morita R, Okishio K, Shimizu J, et al. Real-world effectiveness and safety of nivolumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective observational study in Japan. Lung Cancer 2020; 140: 8–18.
– reference: 10) Gao S, Li N, Gao S, et al. Neoadjuvant PD-1 inhibitor (Sintilimab) in NSCLC. J Thorac Oncol 2020; 15: 816–26.
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62159-5
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz044
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801005
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910231
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyx147
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.21037/atm-21-670
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.11.014
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30365-9
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1016/S1556-0864(15)30371-3
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716078
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.03.003
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.3390/cancers12123572
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7810
– ident: 30
  doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.02.014
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.09.028
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1007/s11748-019-01076-9
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8509
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-00969-w
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.01.017
– ident: 29
  doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa290
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.109
– ident: 25
  doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2019.11.003
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1679884
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1716948
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21492
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.15_suppl.e15125
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1810865
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.09.009
SSID ssj0038660
Score 2.3425195
Snippet Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the...
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been successfully used in many clinical trials related to immunotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
jstage
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 111
SubjectTerms Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy
Humans
immune checkpoint inhibitor
Immunotherapy - adverse effects
Lung Neoplasms
Neoadjuvant Therapy - adverse effects
Neoplasm Staging
non-small cell lung cancer
Original
Prognosis
prognostic factor
real-world effectiveness
retrospective study
Treatment Outcome
Title Real-World Effectiveness and Prognostic Factors Analysis of Stages I–III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Following Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/atcs/28/2/28_oa.21-00143/_article/-char/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34776459
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2597820478
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9081467
Volume 28
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2022, Vol.28(2), pp.111-120
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV3NjtMwELZ2Fw5cEIi_8icjcUFVuo3z4-SEUNlqg9Ae2K7UW-S4jpoVTVA3EWJPvAOPwVvxJMzETpo2K0ThErWOkzqd-TKe8cxnQl7LVPHUcZilFkpYbiASS7BFarkueG6LNJCOqrMtzvzTC_fD3JsfHL7vZC1VZTKS1zfWlfyLVKEN5IpVsntItr0pNMBnkC8cQcJw_CsZf4JZnqXTYTQLcfPqMiUAmESHhKxTs6lOl4EEZplI7xA12Q5OFEXDsyK3zle4Wj3BmN7HCpMCUC_WwykoTPEVAwtnqhCLywqm4OUQ-QYKK8IiE1PK9Q0z3Htdyg55QY-6ebYEPZSGOHaynSB73inbrmn8TQYx_LlZq9fwzUS9l5XIerFwzNy9Xm4WoUzzPBNFqrJu3IOxnbgHouhkkSGTSh1lWa2yslR1nGX_8et3Pxh0sEp6U-yRqttwxy5oG3tdg8GCDjBY5-3f2A09kbDrKr-ejQIHD20UGNqrUSFGDJ4KORY39rjNkjR6FWPXmAUxw0MhYmbH9SVx0wEL9AAPh-QWA2dp3AQW9HzECXxTK28eTy_W4zCOdwexNTm7fXlV1sQTfddrN4O4MyWb3SN3jS9F3-nx3ScHKn9Afm5AQbdAQUE6dAMKakBBG1DQIqUaFDT69f0HwIG2cKAIB4pwoBoOtIUD7eg6vQEOtFj3u5hzD8nF9GQ2ObXMjiSW9N2gtNLEDlPlMiaTEObFzAvGMmFBmibC8yVL692TuOIKnJBA2i5PpAihC_cSxaUtnUfkKC9y9YRQ3_fAmgaOH8KdfOElHg8T23UdmXgOeDUDctyIIpaGrh93jfkcg9uOwtNq0VGHAXnTXvFFU9X8oe9bLd22577KNiCvGrWIwSLhMqPIVVHBxV6IJJwuDwbksVaT9lccl3OkrxoQvqVAbQdku98-k2fLmvU-HONqBX_63yN_Ru5s3ifPyVG5rtQL8CzK5GUNnN_GfDWo
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-World+Effectiveness+and+Prognostic+Factors+Analysis+of+Stages+I%E2%80%93III+Non-Small+Cell+Lung+Cancer+Following+Neoadjuvant+Chemo-Immunotherapy+or+Neoadjuvant+Chemotherapy&rft.jtitle=Annals+of+Thoracic+and+Cardiovascular+Surgery&rft.au=Gong%2C+Jialin&rft.au=Jiang%2C+Shuai&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Mengzhe&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiaofei&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.pub=The+Editorial+Committee+of+Annals+of+Thoracic+and+Cardiovascular+Surgery&rft.issn=1341-1098&rft.eissn=2186-1005&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=120&rft_id=info:doi/10.5761%2Fatcs.oa.21-00143&rft.externalDocID=article_atcs_28_2_28_oa_21_00143_article_char_en
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1341-1098&client=summon