Economic Evaluations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Medical Management

Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematical...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPharmacoEconomics Vol. 32; no. 8; pp. 745 - 758
Main Authors Gawron, Andrew J., French, Dustin D., Pandolfino, John E., Howden, Colin W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cham Springer International Publishing 01.08.2014
Adis International
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. Methods We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Results Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H.   pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3–10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Conclusions Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
AbstractList Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.BACKGROUNDGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.OBJECTIVESOur objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.METHODSWe identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.RESULTSEighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.CONCLUSIONSFurther economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. Methods We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Results Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H.   pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3–10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Conclusions Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. The objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. The authors identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. Methods We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Results Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Conclusions Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.
Audience Academic
Author Pandolfino, John E.
Howden, Colin W.
Gawron, Andrew J.
French, Dustin D.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Andrew J.
  surname: Gawron
  fullname: Gawron, Andrew J.
  email: agawron@northwestern.edu
  organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Dustin D.
  surname: French
  fullname: French, Dustin D.
  organization: Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: John E.
  surname: Pandolfino
  fullname: Pandolfino, John E.
  organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Colin W.
  surname: Howden
  fullname: Howden, Colin W.
  organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University
BackLink http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28609521$$DView record in Pascal Francis
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24807469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9kl1rFDEUhoNU7If-AG9kQARvpub747LUtSotguh1SDLJmjKTrMlM0X9vtrulWlRCSDh53pPDOe8xOEg5eQCeI3iKIBRvKoVYkB4i2janvXwEjhASqsctfnB7h73gCh6C41qvIYScCPwEHGIqoaBcHYGPK5dTnqLrVjdmXMwcc6pdDt2FqXPJvubNN7P2Zuw--zAuP7q3sXpTfXflh-ha-Mqk9j75ND8Fj4MZq3-2P0_A13erL-fv-8tPFx_Ozy57x6mc-4Fj4ZWyAwyBSewGwi3Eg5WMM8sZCYJZMwSriDSCWg9NMEQ6jJQVzFhITsDrXd5Nyd8XX2c9xer8OJrk81I1YlRxQjDCDX35AL3OS0mtukZxzhmkgt5TazN6HVPIczFum1SfCUSZ4lKyRp3-hWpr8K19bTAhtvgfghf7zxc7-UFvSpxM-anvmt-AV3vA1NbKUExysd5zkkPFMGqc2HGu5FqLD9rF-XZSrYI4agT11g56Zwfd7KC3dtCyKdED5V3y_2nwTlMbm9a-_Nazf4p-AUCmw6w
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1002_gamm_201900001
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17406
crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001623
crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_689531
crossref_primary_10_2169_internalmedicine_2535_18
crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161211024941
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cxom_2017_04_002
crossref_primary_10_1177_0897190020977764
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10388_024_01099_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06916_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_022_05396_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suc_2021_03_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000021318
crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i16_1751
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2019_12_009
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40430_023_04305_8
crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NPR_0000737196_69218_b6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2023_105801
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19050
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_019_11968_2
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11781_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_024_02591_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06758_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2024_112107
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_8863
crossref_primary_10_1002_jgf2_429
crossref_primary_10_1177_21501327211046736
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41397_021_00244_6
crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161211066792
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04115_1
crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_18193
crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19188
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2022_001026
crossref_primary_10_3390_nu17061069
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2022_110576
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actbio_2020_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1177_1556984520921957
crossref_primary_10_1111_jcmm_13569
crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_672020230063e1781
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_024_08297_w
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2024_001465
crossref_primary_10_1111_jsr_14158
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2017_07_028
crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2020_323906
crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161241249381
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4409_6
crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022696
crossref_primary_10_1177_0003134821991988
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_662007
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015
10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006
10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y
10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045
10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044
10.1185/03007990903035745
10.1080/00365520510023873
10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x
10.1371/journal.pone.0056060
10.1136/bmj.b2576
10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015
10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x
10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2
10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016
10.1002/bjs.4933
10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x
10.1185/030079905X65330
10.3111/13696990701815545
10.1056/NEJMoa1205544
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x
10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x
10.1038/ajg.2010.368
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x
10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003
10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004
10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x
10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0
10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006
10.3310/hta17220
10.1155/2008/765458
10.3310/hta12310
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
2015 INIST-CNRS
COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer
Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health Adis International Aug 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
– notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer
– notice: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health Adis International Aug 2014
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
IQODW
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
4T-
7WY
7WZ
7X7
7XB
87Z
88C
88E
88G
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
8FL
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
BEZIV
CCPQU
DWQXO
FRNLG
FYUFA
F~G
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K60
K6~
K9.
L.-
L.0
M0C
M0S
M0T
M1P
M2M
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
DOI 10.1007/s40273-014-0164-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
Pascal-Francis
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Docstoc
ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection
Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
Public Health Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
Health Research Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ABI/INFORM Global
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Healthcare Administration Database
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Psychology Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)
ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ABI/INFORM Complete
ProQuest Central
ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ABI/INFORM Professional Standard
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition)
Business Premium Collection
ABI/INFORM Global
ProQuest Public Health
ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health Management
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Business Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Docstoc
ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Business (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
Business Premium Collection (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic

ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)


Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
Economics
Public Health
Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology
EISSN 1179-2027
EndPage 758
ExternalDocumentID 3448309971
A714596885
24807469
28609521
10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8
Genre Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S
Review
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
GeographicLocations United States
North America
America
United Kingdom--UK
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
– name: United Kingdom--UK
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK079902
– fundername: AHRQ HHS
  grantid: T32 HS000078
– fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DK092217
– fundername: AHRQ HHS
  grantid: T-32 HS000078
GroupedDBID ---
-5G
-BR
-EM
0R~
0VX
123
199
29O
36B
3V.
4.4
406
53G
6I2
7WY
7X7
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FL
8R4
8R5
8V8
95.
AAAUJ
AACDK
AADNT
AAIAL
AAIKX
AAJKR
AAKAS
AANZL
AARHV
AASML
AATNV
AAWTL
AAYOK
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABAKF
ABDZT
ABFTV
ABIVO
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKCH
ABKMS
ABKTR
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABUWG
ABWHX
ABXPI
ACAOD
ACCOQ
ACCUX
ACDTI
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACMJI
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACPIV
ACREN
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADFZG
ADHHG
ADQRH
ADRFC
ADURQ
ADYOE
ADZCM
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEFQL
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AESKC
AEVLU
AEXYK
AEYRQ
AFALF
AFBBN
AFKRA
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGQEE
AGQMX
AGRTI
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIAKS
AIGIU
AILAN
AIZAD
AJRNO
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AQUVI
ASPBG
AVWKF
AWSVR
AXYYD
AZFZN
AZQEC
A~4
BENPR
BEZIV
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
BYPQX
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DCUDU
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
DWQXO
EBLON
EBR
EBS
EBU
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FERAY
FIGPU
FLLZZ
FNLPD
FRNLG
FSGXE
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
HG6
HMCUK
IAO
IBB
IEA
IHR
ITC
IWAJR
J-C
J5H
JZLTJ
K1G
K60
K6~
LGEZI
LLZTM
LOTEE
M0C
M0T
M1P
M2M
M4Y
NADUK
NQJWS
NU0
NXXTH
OAC
OPC
OVD
P2P
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
Q2X
RIG
ROL
RSV
RZALA
SISQX
SJYHP
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPKJE
SRMVM
SSLCW
TEORI
TSG
U9L
UAX
UG4
UKHRP
UTJUX
VDBLX
VFIZW
W48
WAF
YFH
YQY
Z0Y
Z7U
ZMTXR
~JE
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AFOHR
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
IQODW
ABRTQ
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
AEIIB
PMFND
4T-
7XB
8FK
K9.
L.-
L.0
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PUEGO
Q9U
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-d627e99bd0ff582cd36b02db8565b653f75badfb938a74be0afa38c219b75ab03
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1170-7690
1179-2027
IngestDate Thu Jul 10 20:13:54 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 12:39:52 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:39:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:15:10 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:54:41 EDT 2025
Wed Apr 02 08:10:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:59:04 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:35 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:30:28 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 8
Keywords Reflux Symptom
Economic Evaluation
Esomeprazole
Proton Pump Inhibitor
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Human
Gastroesophageal reflux
Treatment
Health economy
Esophageal disease
Digestive diseases
Public health
Cost efficiency analysis
Proton pump inhibitor
Language English
License CC BY 4.0
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c648t-d627e99bd0ff582cd36b02db8565b653f75badfb938a74be0afa38c219b75ab03
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4394741
PMID 24807469
PQID 1566650474
PQPubID 43702
PageCount 14
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1549633212
proquest_journals_1566650474
gale_infotracmisc_A714596885
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A714596885
pubmed_primary_24807469
pascalfrancis_primary_28609521
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8
springer_journals_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-08-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-08-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-08-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Cham
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Cham
– name: Auckland
– name: New Zealand
PublicationTitle PharmacoEconomics
PublicationTitleAbbrev PharmacoEconomics
PublicationTitleAlternate Pharmacoeconomics
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Springer International Publishing
Adis International
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer International Publishing
– name: Adis International
– name: Springer
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Klapow, Wilcox, Mallinger, Marks, Heudebert, Centor (CR26) 2002; 34
You, Wong, Wu (CR17) 2006; 41
Ahmed, Khandwala, Abelson, Hicks, Richter, Milstein (CR35) 2006; 101
Goeree, Hopkins, Marshall, Armstrong, Ungar, Goldsmith (CR15) 2011; 14
Moayyedi, Armstrong, Hunt, Lei, Bukoski, White (CR19) 2010; 105
Baldi, Cavoli, Ghersi, Mantovani, Torresan, Roda (CR24) 2006; 38
Giannini, Zentilin, Dulbecco, Vigneri, Scarlata, Savarino (CR16) 2008; 103
Habu, Maeda, Kusuda, Yoshino, Shio, Yamazaki (CR23) 2005; 40
Lundell (CR31) 2010; 24
CR13
Spechler, Lee, Ahnen, Goyal, Hirano, Ramirez (CR30) 2001; 285
CR33
Kahrilas, Shaheen, Vaezi (CR28) 2008; 135
Arguedas, Heudebert, Klapow, Centor, Eloubeidi, Wilcox (CR10) 2004; 99
Peery, Dellon, Lund, Crockett, McGowan, Bulsiewicz (CR1) 2012; 143
Levin, Schmittdiel, Kunz, Henning, Henke (CR5) 1997; 103
Epstein, Bojke, Sculpher (CR12) 2009; 339
Comay, Adam, da Silveira, Kennedy, Mayrand, Barkun (CR9) 2008; 22
Shaheen, Hansen, Morgan, Gangarosa, Ringel, Thiny (CR4) 2006; 101
El-Serag (CR2) 2007; 5
Chey, Mody, Wu, Chen, Kothari, Persson (CR37) 2009; 25
Chey, Inadomi, Booher, Sharma, Fendrick, Howden (CR38) 2005; 100
Ganz, Peters, Horgan, Bemelman, Dunst, Edmundowicz (CR34) 2013; 368
Gatenby, Bann (CR32) 2009; 64
Bretagne, Honnorat, Richard-Molard, Soufflet, Barthelemy (CR36) 2007; 25
Harewood, Gostout (CR22) 2003; 58
CR6
Husereau, Drummond, Petrou, Carswell, Moher, Greenberg (CR7) 2013; 16
Gosselin, Luo, Lohoues, Toy, Lewis, Crawley (CR25) 2009; 12
Remák, Brown, Yuen, Robinson (CR21) 2005; 21
Cookson, Flood, Koo, Mahon, Rhodes (CR11) 2005; 92
Bojke, Hornby, Sculpher (CR14) 2007; 25
Rotman, Bishop (CR29) 2013; 8
Everhart, Ruhl (CR3) 2009; 136
CR40
Doan, Lange, Elfant, Aguilar, Reyes, Lynn (CR18) 2008; 11
Grant, Boachie, Cotton, Faria, Bojke, Epstein (CR8) 2013; 17
You, Lee, Won, Anà, Wong, Chan (CR20) 2003; 17
Kahrilas, Shaheen, Vaezi, Hiltz, Black, Modlin (CR27) 2008; 135
Gawron, Pandolfino, Miskevics, Lavela (CR39) 2013; 28
JE Everhart (164_CR3) 2009; 136
RA Ganz (164_CR34) 2013; 368
TR Levin (164_CR5) 1997; 103
WD Chey (164_CR37) 2009; 25
D Epstein (164_CR12) 2009; 339
PJ Kahrilas (164_CR28) 2008; 135
HB El-Serag (164_CR2) 2007; 5
MR Arguedas (164_CR10) 2004; 99
AF Peery (164_CR1) 2012; 143
N Shaheen (164_CR4) 2006; 101
AJ Gawron (164_CR39) 2013; 28
JC Klapow (164_CR26) 2002; 34
164_CR6
E Remák (164_CR21) 2005; 21
AM Grant (164_CR8) 2013; 17
GC Harewood (164_CR22) 2003; 58
P Moayyedi (164_CR19) 2010; 105
164_CR33
164_CR13
P Gatenby (164_CR32) 2009; 64
TF Ahmed (164_CR35) 2006; 101
R Cookson (164_CR11) 2005; 92
PJ Kahrilas (164_CR27) 2008; 135
QV Doan (164_CR18) 2008; 11
JF Bretagne (164_CR36) 2007; 25
D Comay (164_CR9) 2008; 22
JHS You (164_CR20) 2003; 17
WD Chey (164_CR38) 2005; 100
F Baldi (164_CR24) 2006; 38
R Goeree (164_CR15) 2011; 14
SJ Spechler (164_CR30) 2001; 285
D Husereau (164_CR7) 2013; 16
JHS You (164_CR17) 2006; 41
EG Giannini (164_CR16) 2008; 103
Y Habu (164_CR23) 2005; 40
L Bojke (164_CR14) 2007; 25
A Gosselin (164_CR25) 2009; 12
L Lundell (164_CR31) 2010; 24
SR Rotman (164_CR29) 2013; 8
164_CR40
19654097 - BMJ. 2009;339:b2576
19530980 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78
11343480 - JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2331-8
11960060 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 May-Jun;34(5):509-15
16631423 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):452-8
17887805 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41
17373921 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr 1;25(7):823-33
21126706 - Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;24(6):947-59
23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(22):1-167
18801365 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1392-1413, 1413.e1-5
12641500 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar 15;17(6):785-92
14520279 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):493-9
23538175 - Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50
23425164 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27
18560633 - Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;22(6):552-8
18789939 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1383-1391, 1391.e1-5
9428836 - Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):520-8
23418510 - PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56060
16542282 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):470-8
16848807 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38
18289194 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):267-75
20842110 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6
15180720 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8
16322946 - J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;40(11):1029-35
17142109 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):17-26
18796263 - Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv
19365317 - Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):169-81
16238890 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1505-17
19450108 - J Med Econ. 2008;11(1):23-40
15929751 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1237-42
22650250 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:58
19895371 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):34-9
16373272 - Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):21-9
22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3
23400526 - J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):930-7
21402295 - Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):263-73
19124023 - Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):376-86
15852426 - Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):700-6
References_xml – volume: 38
  start-page: 452
  year: 2006
  end-page: 458
  ident: CR24
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic strategies to assess gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with unexplained chronic persistent cough in Italy
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015
– volume: 34
  start-page: 509
  year: 2002
  end-page: 515
  ident: CR26
  article-title: Characterization of long-term outcomes after Toupet fundoplication: symptoms, medication use, and health status
  publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  end-page: 167
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial)
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1029
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1035
  ident: CR23
  article-title: “Proton-pump inhibitor-first” strategy versus “step-up” strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y
– volume: 135
  start-page: 1383
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1391
  ident: CR27
  article-title: American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045
– volume: 135
  start-page: 1392
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1413
  ident: CR28
  article-title: American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1869
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1878
  ident: CR37
  article-title: Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745
– volume: 64
  start-page: 169
  year: 2009
  end-page: 181
  ident: CR32
  article-title: Antireflux surgery
  publication-title: Minerva Chir
– volume: 41
  start-page: 21
  year: 2006
  end-page: 29
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of “test and treat” for patients with typical reflux symptoms in a population with a high prevalence of infection: a Markov model analysis
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1080/00365520510023873
– volume: 17
  start-page: 785
  year: 2003
  end-page: 792
  ident: CR20
  article-title: Low-dose or standard-dose proton pump inhibitors for maintenance therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: e56060
  year: 2013
  ident: CR29
  article-title: Proton pump inhibitor use in the U.S. ambulatory setting, 2002–2009
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056060
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2576
  year: 2009
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576
– volume: 136
  start-page: 376
  year: 2009
  end-page: 386
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015
– volume: 143
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1187
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002
– ident: CR33
– volume: 101
  start-page: 2128
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2138
  ident: CR4
  article-title: The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x
– ident: CR6
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1023
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1028
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus medical therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the value of long-term data collection
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x
– volume: 285
  start-page: 2331
  year: 2001
  end-page: 2338
  ident: CR30
  article-title: Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
– volume: 103
  start-page: 520
  issue: 6
  year: 1997
  end-page: 528
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Costs of acid-related disorders to a health maintenance organization
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2
– ident: CR40
– volume: 5
  start-page: 17
  year: 2007
  end-page: 26
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016
– volume: 92
  start-page: 700
  year: 2005
  end-page: 706
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Short-term cost effectiveness and long-term cost analysis comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with proton-pump inhibitor maintenance for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.4933
– volume: 16
  start-page: 231
  year: 2013
  end-page: 250
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
– volume: 103
  start-page: 267
  year: 2008
  end-page: 275
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Management strategy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1505
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1517
  ident: CR21
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness comparison of current proton-pump inhibitors to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the UK
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/030079905X65330
– volume: 11
  start-page: 23
  year: 2008
  end-page: 40
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Disease-specific cost savings of treating nighttime versus daytime gastroesophageal reflux disease in an employed population
  publication-title: J Med Econ
  doi: 10.3111/13696990701815545
– volume: 368
  start-page: 719
  year: 2013
  end-page: 727
  ident: CR34
  article-title: Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1237
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1242
  ident: CR38
  article-title: Primary-care physicians’ perceptions and practices on the management of GERD: results of a national survey
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x
– volume: 12
  start-page: 34
  year: 2009
  end-page: 39
  ident: CR25
  article-title: The impact of proton pump inhibitor compliance on health-care resource utilization and costs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x
– ident: CR13
– volume: 105
  start-page: 2341
  year: 2010
  end-page: 2346
  ident: CR19
  article-title: The gain in quality-adjusted life months by switching to esomeprazole in those with continued reflux symptoms in primary care: EncomPASS—a cluster-randomized trial
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368
– volume: 101
  start-page: 470
  year: 2006
  end-page: 478
  ident: CR35
  article-title: Chronic laryngitis associated with gastroesophageal reflux: prospective assessment of differences in practice patterns between gastroenterologists and ENT physicians
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x
– volume: 25
  start-page: 829
  year: 2007
  end-page: 841
  ident: CR14
  article-title: A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD
  publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics
  doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003
– volume: 14
  start-page: 263
  year: 2011
  end-page: 273
  ident: CR15
  article-title: Cost-utility of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004
– volume: 58
  start-page: 493
  year: 2003
  end-page: 499
  ident: CR22
  article-title: Cost analysis of endoscopic antireflux procedures: endoluminal plication vs. radiofrequency coagulation vs. treatment with a proton pump inhibitor
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 25
  start-page: 823
  year: 2007
  end-page: 833
  ident: CR36
  article-title: Perceptions and practices on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: results of a national survey comparing primary care physicians and gastroenterologists
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x
– volume: 28
  start-page: 930
  year: 2013
  end-page: 937
  ident: CR39
  article-title: Proton pump inhibitor prescriptions and subsequent use in US Veterans diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0
– volume: 22
  start-page: 552
  year: 2008
  end-page: 558
  ident: CR9
  article-title: The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis
  publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol
– volume: 24
  start-page: 947
  year: 2010
  end-page: 959
  ident: CR31
  article-title: Surgical therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006
– volume: 5
  start-page: 17
  year: 2007
  ident: 164_CR2
  publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
  doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1869
  year: 2009
  ident: 164_CR37
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745
– volume: 28
  start-page: 930
  year: 2013
  ident: 164_CR39
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0
– volume: 136
  start-page: 376
  year: 2009
  ident: 164_CR3
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015
– volume: 12
  start-page: 34
  year: 2009
  ident: 164_CR25
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x
– volume: 14
  start-page: 263
  year: 2011
  ident: 164_CR15
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004
– volume: 135
  start-page: 1383
  year: 2008
  ident: 164_CR27
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045
– volume: 16
  start-page: 231
  year: 2013
  ident: 164_CR7
  publication-title: Value Health
  doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002
– volume: 105
  start-page: 2341
  year: 2010
  ident: 164_CR19
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368
– volume: 135
  start-page: 1392
  year: 2008
  ident: 164_CR28
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044
– volume: 41
  start-page: 21
  year: 2006
  ident: 164_CR17
  publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1080/00365520510023873
– volume: 143
  start-page: 1179
  year: 2012
  ident: 164_CR1
  publication-title: Gastroenterology
  doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002
– volume: 58
  start-page: 493
  year: 2003
  ident: 164_CR22
  publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc
– volume: 25
  start-page: 823
  year: 2007
  ident: 164_CR36
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x
– volume: 100
  start-page: 1237
  year: 2005
  ident: 164_CR38
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x
– volume: 92
  start-page: 700
  year: 2005
  ident: 164_CR11
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.4933
– volume: 11
  start-page: 23
  year: 2008
  ident: 164_CR18
  publication-title: J Med Econ
  doi: 10.3111/13696990701815545
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1505
  year: 2005
  ident: 164_CR21
  publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin
  doi: 10.1185/030079905X65330
– volume: 103
  start-page: 520
  issue: 6
  year: 1997
  ident: 164_CR5
  publication-title: Am J Med
  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2
– volume: 25
  start-page: 829
  year: 2007
  ident: 164_CR14
  publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics
  doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003
– volume: 101
  start-page: 2128
  year: 2006
  ident: 164_CR4
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: e56060
  year: 2013
  ident: 164_CR29
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056060
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 164_CR8
  publication-title: Health Technol Assess
  doi: 10.3310/hta17220
– volume: 40
  start-page: 1029
  year: 2005
  ident: 164_CR23
  publication-title: J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y
– volume: 22
  start-page: 552
  year: 2008
  ident: 164_CR9
  publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1155/2008/765458
– volume: 17
  start-page: 785
  year: 2003
  ident: 164_CR20
  publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x
– ident: 164_CR13
  doi: 10.3310/hta12310
– volume: 339
  start-page: b2576
  year: 2009
  ident: 164_CR12
  publication-title: BMJ
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576
– volume: 285
  start-page: 2331
  year: 2001
  ident: 164_CR30
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331
– ident: 164_CR33
– ident: 164_CR40
– volume: 103
  start-page: 267
  year: 2008
  ident: 164_CR16
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x
– volume: 99
  start-page: 1023
  year: 2004
  ident: 164_CR10
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x
– volume: 101
  start-page: 470
  year: 2006
  ident: 164_CR35
  publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x
– volume: 38
  start-page: 452
  year: 2006
  ident: 164_CR24
  publication-title: Dig Liver Dis
  doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015
– volume: 368
  start-page: 719
  year: 2013
  ident: 164_CR34
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544
– volume: 64
  start-page: 169
  year: 2009
  ident: 164_CR32
  publication-title: Minerva Chir
– volume: 34
  start-page: 509
  year: 2002
  ident: 164_CR26
  publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006
– volume: 24
  start-page: 947
  year: 2010
  ident: 164_CR31
  publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006
– ident: 164_CR6
– reference: 16631423 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):452-8
– reference: 20842110 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6
– reference: 16322946 - J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;40(11):1029-35
– reference: 23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(22):1-167
– reference: 16373272 - Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):21-9
– reference: 9428836 - Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):520-8
– reference: 23418510 - PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56060
– reference: 18801365 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1392-1413, 1413.e1-5
– reference: 19124023 - Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):376-86
– reference: 18560633 - Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;22(6):552-8
– reference: 14520279 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):493-9
– reference: 17142109 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):17-26
– reference: 11343480 - JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2331-8
– reference: 16848807 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38
– reference: 19530980 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78
– reference: 23400526 - J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):930-7
– reference: 15852426 - Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):700-6
– reference: 22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3
– reference: 21402295 - Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):263-73
– reference: 15929751 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1237-42
– reference: 19654097 - BMJ. 2009;339:b2576
– reference: 16238890 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1505-17
– reference: 18289194 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):267-75
– reference: 16542282 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):470-8
– reference: 19450108 - J Med Econ. 2008;11(1):23-40
– reference: 23425164 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27
– reference: 23538175 - Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50
– reference: 21126706 - Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;24(6):947-59
– reference: 15180720 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8
– reference: 19895371 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):34-9
– reference: 18796263 - Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv
– reference: 22650250 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:58
– reference: 12641500 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar 15;17(6):785-92
– reference: 11960060 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 May-Jun;34(5):509-15
– reference: 19365317 - Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):169-81
– reference: 18789939 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1383-1391, 1391.e1-5
– reference: 17887805 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41
– reference: 17373921 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr 1;25(7):823-33
SSID ssj0006372
Score 2.3181841
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the...
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of...
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
pascalfrancis
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 745
SubjectTerms Biological and medical sciences
Clinical outcomes
Cost analysis
Cost benefit analysis
Cost estimates
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Diagnostic tests
Digestive system
Disease
Disease management
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy
Economy. Management
Endoscopy
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - economics
English language
Esophagus
Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen
Gastroesophageal reflux
Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis
Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy
Gastroesophageal Reflux - economics
Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery
Health Administration
Health and social institutions
Health Care Costs
Health care expenditures
Health care policy
Health Economics
Health maintenance organizations
Helicobacter infections
Helicobacter Infections - economics
Helicobacter Infections - microbiology
Helicobacter pylori - isolation & purification
HMOs
Humans
Laparoscopy
Libraries
Medical sciences
Medical treatment
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Methods
Other diseases. Semiology
Patients
Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Prevention
Prices and rates
Proton pump inhibitors
Proton Pump Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Proton Pump Inhibitors - economics
Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Public Health
Public health. Hygiene
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
Quality of Life Research
Risk factors
Studies
Surgery
Systematic Review
Title Economic Evaluations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Medical Management
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40273-014-0164-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24807469
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1566650474
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1549633212
Volume 32
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9QwDLdgewBpQjA-VthOQUJDglX0I03TJzTGjWkS02napHurkiZ5mq7Heiex_x67TVtOjL30oU3StHYcO7Z_BviQOLxvizQUqcpCblUcqljqUDqb8jzTmjs6h_x5Ic6u-fk8m_sDt8aHVfYysRXUpq7ojPwL2RmoTfCcf13-CqlqFHlXfQmNx7BN0GXE1fl8MLhw922LN7XFVXI0A3uvJqXOcQJyQUOaYjAED-XGvuSl885SNfinXFfi4j4d9B__abstnT6HZ16fZMcdA7yAR3axC0_6dONmFw5nHTj13RG7GnOtmiN2yGYjbPXdSzjvO7HpgADesNqxH6pZ3daW6h2g8MGXXVp3s_7Nvne-HeZ9PWyMpHkF16fTq5Oz0FdaCCvB5So0IsltUWgTOZfJpDKp0FFitER1T4ssdUg1ZZwuUqlyrm2knEplhdJO55nSUfoathb1wu4B46hiGItWVWwcN9oWuRGxqAprtNJKVQFE_X8uKw9DTtUwbsoBQLklTYmkKYk0pQzg09Bl2WFwPNT4IxGvpPWJ41bKpxng7AjpqjzOY54VQsosgP2Nlriuqo3Hkw3yD69OJIH0JTH27_mh9Au_KUc2DeD98JiGpmC2ha3X1Iaj2EtRaQjgTcdH4-CU4s9FEcDnnrH-Gvx_H_324am8g6dJy-kUt7gPW6vbtT1AXWqlJ-2Cwas8iSew_W16Mbv8AybcG9M
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcigSQlAeDZRiJCgSbdRN7DjOAaGqD7ZPVWgr9Rbs2D5Vu0uzK9g_xW9kJo8NK6C3XhPbcTIPz2RmvgF4F3u87jIeSq6TUDgdhTpSJlTecZEmxghP_yHPzmX_UhxfJVdL8KuthaG0ylYnVorajgr6R75DfgZaEyIVn8ffQ-oaRdHVtoVGzRYnbvYDXbby09E-0vd9HB8eDPb6YdNVICykUJPQyjh1WWZsz_tExYXl0vRiaxSaNkYm3OMOtfUm40qnwrie9pqrAiXbpIk2PY7r3oP7gqNoUmX6XpdSInnVLKpq5pKi29lGUalUTxBwDDrulPMhRagWzsHmNHg41iVSxtctNf5l8_4Vr62OwcPH8KixX9luzXBPYMkNV2GlLW8uV2HzogbDnm2zQVfbVW6zTXbRwWTPnsJxO4kdzBHHSzby7IsuJzcjR_0VUNnhw746fz39yfbrWBJrYkusy9x5Bpd3QoPnsDwcDd0aMIEmjXXoxUXWC2tclloZySJz1mijdRFAr_3OedHAnlP3jet8DthckSZH0uREmlwF8HE-ZVxjftw2-AMRLyd9gOsWuilrwN0Rsla-m0YiyaRSSQDrCyNRjouF2xsL5J8_OlYEChhHOL_lh7xRNGXeiUUAb-e3aWlKnhu60ZTGCFSzHI2UAF7UfNQtTpACQmYBbLWM9cfi_3vpl7dv5Q2s9Adnp_np0fnJK3gQV1xPOZPrsDy5mbrXaMdNzEYlPAy-3bW0_gZJ71dx
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIgESQlAeDZRiJCgSNOomdhzngFDV7dIHVCvUSr0FO7ZP1e622RXsX-PXMZPHhhXQW6-J7TiZh2cyM98AvIk9XncZDyXXSSicjkIdKRMq77hIE2OEp_-QX0_kwZk4Ok_OV-BXWwtDaZWtTqwUtR0X9I98h_wMtCZEKnZ8kxYx7A8-TS5D6iBFkda2nUbNIsdu_gPdt_LjYR9p_TaOB_unewdh02EgLKRQ09DKOHVZZmzP-0TFheXS9GJrFJo5Ribc42619SbjSqfCuJ72mqsCpdykiTY9juvegtspTxXJmNrr0kskrxpHVY1dUnRB24gqle0JApFBJ57yP6QI1dKZ2JwM9ye6RCr5ur3Gv-zfv2K31ZE4eAgPGluW7dbM9whW3GgN7ralzuUabA1rYOz5Njvt6rzKbbbFhh1k9vwxHLWT2P4CfbxkY88-63J6NXbUawEVHz7sm_MXs5-sX8eVWBNnYl0WzxM4uxEaPIXV0Xjk1oEJNG-sQ48usl5Y47LUykgWmbNGG62LAHrtd86LBgKdOnFc5Avw5oo0OZImJ9LkKoD3iymTGv_jusHviHg56QZct9BNiQPujlC28t00EkkmlUoC2FgaiTJdLN3eXCL_4tGxIoDAOML5LT_kjdIp805EAni9uE1LUyLdyI1nNEagyuVosATwrOajbnGCFxAyC-BDy1h_LP6_l35-_VZewR2U0_zL4cnxC7gXV0xP6ZMbsDq9mrmXaNJNzWYlOwy-37Sw_gZ6qlun
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic+Evaluations+of+Gastroesophageal+Reflux+Disease+Medical+Management&rft.jtitle=PharmacoEconomics&rft.au=GAWRON%2C+Andrew+J&rft.au=FRENCH%2C+Dustin+D&rft.au=PANDOLFINO%2C+John+E&rft.au=HOWDEN%2C+Colin+W&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.pub=Adis+International&rft.issn=1170-7690&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40273-014-0164-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=28609521
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon