Economic Evaluations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Medical Management
Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematical...
Saved in:
Published in | PharmacoEconomics Vol. 32; no. 8; pp. 745 - 758 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cham
Springer International Publishing
01.08.2014
Adis International Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.
Objectives
Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.
Methods
We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.
Results
Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high
Helicobacter pylori
prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or
H.
pylori
testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3–10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.
Conclusions
Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.
Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.
We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.
Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.
Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.BACKGROUNDGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments.Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.OBJECTIVESOur objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations.We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.METHODSWe identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis.Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.RESULTSEighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data.Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies.CONCLUSIONSFurther economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. Methods We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Results Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3–10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Conclusions Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. The objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. The authors identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Objectives Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. Methods We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Results Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Conclusions Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of healthcare, taking into account cost, quality, and benefits of particular treatments. Our objectives were to systematically review the existing literature to identify economic evaluations of GERD management strategies, to assess the scientific quality of these reports, and to summarize the economic outcomes of these evaluations. We identified economic evaluations and cost studies of GERD management strategies by searching PubMed and the UK NHS Economic Evaluation Database via the Cochrane Library. Searching was restricted to articles in English-language journals from July 2003 to July 2013. Cost-identification articles were excluded from the final analysis. Eighteen articles were included in the final analysis; 61 % of these met all criteria for quality reporting. Overall, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy was preferred (most effective and least costly) as empiric therapy for patients with reflux symptoms, except in patient populations with high Helicobacter pylori prevalence (>40 %). Initial empiric PPI therapy (vs. initial endoscopy stratification or H. pylori testing) is likely the most cost-effective initial strategy for patients with typical GERD symptoms. Surgery may be cost effective in patients with chronic GERD symptoms at time horizons of 3-10 years. Endoscopic anti-reflux procedures were not cost effective based on available data. Further economic evaluations should adhere to standard reporting measures of cost estimates and outcomes, and should attempt to account for and compare the large heterogeneity of patient phenotypes and treatment effects seen with anti-reflux therapies. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Pandolfino, John E. Howden, Colin W. Gawron, Andrew J. French, Dustin D. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Andrew J. surname: Gawron fullname: Gawron, Andrew J. email: agawron@northwestern.edu organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University – sequence: 2 givenname: Dustin D. surname: French fullname: French, Dustin D. organization: Center for Healthcare Studies, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Department of Ophthalmology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University – sequence: 3 givenname: John E. surname: Pandolfino fullname: Pandolfino, John E. organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University – sequence: 4 givenname: Colin W. surname: Howden fullname: Howden, Colin W. organization: Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28609521$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24807469$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9kl1rFDEUhoNU7If-AG9kQARvpub747LUtSotguh1SDLJmjKTrMlM0X9vtrulWlRCSDh53pPDOe8xOEg5eQCeI3iKIBRvKoVYkB4i2janvXwEjhASqsctfnB7h73gCh6C41qvIYScCPwEHGIqoaBcHYGPK5dTnqLrVjdmXMwcc6pdDt2FqXPJvubNN7P2Zuw--zAuP7q3sXpTfXflh-ha-Mqk9j75ND8Fj4MZq3-2P0_A13erL-fv-8tPFx_Ozy57x6mc-4Fj4ZWyAwyBSewGwi3Eg5WMM8sZCYJZMwSriDSCWg9NMEQ6jJQVzFhITsDrXd5Nyd8XX2c9xer8OJrk81I1YlRxQjDCDX35AL3OS0mtukZxzhmkgt5TazN6HVPIczFum1SfCUSZ4lKyRp3-hWpr8K19bTAhtvgfghf7zxc7-UFvSpxM-anvmt-AV3vA1NbKUExysd5zkkPFMGqc2HGu5FqLD9rF-XZSrYI4agT11g56Zwfd7KC3dtCyKdED5V3y_2nwTlMbm9a-_Nazf4p-AUCmw6w |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1002_gamm_201900001 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_17406 crossref_primary_10_1097_MCG_0000000000001623 crossref_primary_10_1155_2015_689531 crossref_primary_10_2169_internalmedicine_2535_18 crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161211024941 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cxom_2017_04_002 crossref_primary_10_1177_0897190020977764 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10388_024_01099_z crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06916_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_022_05396_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suc_2021_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000021318 crossref_primary_10_3748_wjg_v27_i16_1751 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_giec_2019_12_009 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40430_023_04305_8 crossref_primary_10_1097_01_NPR_0000737196_69218_b6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2023_105801 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19050 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_019_11968_2 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12913_024_11781_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13643_024_02591_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00464_019_06758_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jbiomech_2024_112107 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_8863 crossref_primary_10_1002_jgf2_429 crossref_primary_10_1177_21501327211046736 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41397_021_00244_6 crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161211066792 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11605_019_04115_1 crossref_primary_10_1111_apt_18193 crossref_primary_10_5056_jnm19188 crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2022_001026 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu17061069 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_matdes_2022_110576 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_actbio_2020_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1177_1556984520921957 crossref_primary_10_1111_jcmm_13569 crossref_primary_10_1590_0102_672020230063e1781 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_024_08297_w crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjgast_2024_001465 crossref_primary_10_1111_jsr_14158 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmbbm_2017_07_028 crossref_primary_10_1136_gutjnl_2020_323906 crossref_primary_10_1177_26345161241249381 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10620_016_4409_6 crossref_primary_10_1097_MD_0000000000022696 crossref_primary_10_1177_0003134821991988 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2021_662007 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044 10.1185/03007990903035745 10.1080/00365520510023873 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x 10.1371/journal.pone.0056060 10.1136/bmj.b2576 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016 10.1002/bjs.4933 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x 10.1185/030079905X65330 10.3111/13696990701815545 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x 10.1038/ajg.2010.368 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x 10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006 10.3310/hta17220 10.1155/2008/765458 10.3310/hta12310 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 2015 INIST-CNRS COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health Adis International Aug 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014 – notice: 2015 INIST-CNRS – notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 Springer – notice: Copyright Wolters Kluwer Health Adis International Aug 2014 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 4T- 7WY 7WZ 7X7 7XB 87Z 88C 88E 88G 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8FL ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR BEZIV CCPQU DWQXO FRNLG FYUFA F~G GHDGH GNUQQ K60 K6~ K9. L.- L.0 M0C M0S M0T M1P M2M PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQBIZ PQBZA PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1007/s40273-014-0164-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Docstoc ProQuest ABI/INFORM Collection ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) Public Health Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection ProQuest One ProQuest Central Business Premium Collection (Alumni) Health Research Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Psychology Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ABI/INFORM Complete ProQuest Central ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ABI/INFORM Professional Standard ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ABI/INFORM Complete (Alumni Edition) Business Premium Collection ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Public Health ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health Management ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Business Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Docstoc ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Business (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) Business Premium Collection (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate) |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Economics Public Health Pharmacy, Therapeutics, & Pharmacology |
EISSN | 1179-2027 |
EndPage | 758 |
ExternalDocumentID | 3448309971 A714596885 24807469 28609521 10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8 |
Genre | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S Review Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural |
GeographicLocations | United States North America America United Kingdom--UK |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: United Kingdom--UK |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01 DK079902 – fundername: AHRQ HHS grantid: T32 HS000078 – fundername: NIDDK NIH HHS grantid: R01 DK092217 – fundername: AHRQ HHS grantid: T-32 HS000078 |
GroupedDBID | --- -5G -BR -EM 0R~ 0VX 123 199 29O 36B 3V. 4.4 406 53G 6I2 7WY 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FL 8R4 8R5 8V8 95. AAAUJ AACDK AADNT AAIAL AAIKX AAJKR AAKAS AANZL AARHV AASML AATNV AAWTL AAYOK AAYQN AAYTO ABAKF ABDZT ABFTV ABIVO ABJNI ABJOX ABKCH ABKMS ABKTR ABOCM ABPLI ABTKH ABTMW ABUWG ABWHX ABXPI ACAOD ACCOQ ACCUX ACDTI ACGFO ACGFS ACHQT ACMJI ACMLO ACOKC ACPIV ACREN ACZOJ ADBBV ADFRT ADFZG ADHHG ADQRH ADRFC ADURQ ADYOE ADZCM ADZKW AEBTG AEFQL AEJHL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AESKC AEVLU AEXYK AEYRQ AFALF AFBBN AFKRA AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGQEE AGQMX AGRTI AHMBA AHSBF AIAKS AIGIU AILAN AIZAD AJRNO ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AQUVI ASPBG AVWKF AWSVR AXYYD AZFZN AZQEC A~4 BENPR BEZIV BGNMA BPHCQ BVXVI BYPQX CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DCUDU DNIVK DPUIP DU5 DWQXO EBLON EBR EBS EBU EJD EMOBN ESX F5P FERAY FIGPU FLLZZ FNLPD FRNLG FSGXE FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH HG6 HMCUK IAO IBB IEA IHR ITC IWAJR J-C J5H JZLTJ K1G K60 K6~ LGEZI LLZTM LOTEE M0C M0T M1P M2M M4Y NADUK NQJWS NU0 NXXTH OAC OPC OVD P2P PQBIZ PQBZA PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ Q2X RIG ROL RSV RZALA SISQX SJYHP SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPKJE SRMVM SSLCW TEORI TSG U9L UAX UG4 UKHRP UTJUX VDBLX VFIZW W48 WAF YFH YQY Z0Y Z7U ZMTXR ~JE AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AFOHR AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT IQODW ABRTQ CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY AEIIB PMFND 4T- 7XB 8FK K9. L.- L.0 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PUEGO Q9U 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c648t-d627e99bd0ff582cd36b02db8565b653f75badfb938a74be0afa38c219b75ab03 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 1170-7690 1179-2027 |
IngestDate | Thu Jul 10 20:13:54 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:39:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:39:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:15:10 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:54:41 EDT 2025 Wed Apr 02 08:10:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:59:04 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:35 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:30:28 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 8 |
Keywords | Reflux Symptom Economic Evaluation Esomeprazole Proton Pump Inhibitor Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Human Gastroesophageal reflux Treatment Health economy Esophageal disease Digestive diseases Public health Cost efficiency analysis Proton pump inhibitor |
Language | English |
License | CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c648t-d627e99bd0ff582cd36b02db8565b653f75badfb938a74be0afa38c219b75ab03 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4394741 |
PMID | 24807469 |
PQID | 1566650474 |
PQPubID | 43702 |
PageCount | 14 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1549633212 proquest_journals_1566650474 gale_infotracmisc_A714596885 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A714596885 pubmed_primary_24807469 pascalfrancis_primary_28609521 crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8 springer_journals_10_1007_s40273_014_0164_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-08-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-08-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2014 text: 2014-08-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Cham |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cham – name: Auckland – name: New Zealand |
PublicationTitle | PharmacoEconomics |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | PharmacoEconomics |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Pharmacoeconomics |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Springer International Publishing Adis International Springer Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer International Publishing – name: Adis International – name: Springer – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Klapow, Wilcox, Mallinger, Marks, Heudebert, Centor (CR26) 2002; 34 You, Wong, Wu (CR17) 2006; 41 Ahmed, Khandwala, Abelson, Hicks, Richter, Milstein (CR35) 2006; 101 Goeree, Hopkins, Marshall, Armstrong, Ungar, Goldsmith (CR15) 2011; 14 Moayyedi, Armstrong, Hunt, Lei, Bukoski, White (CR19) 2010; 105 Baldi, Cavoli, Ghersi, Mantovani, Torresan, Roda (CR24) 2006; 38 Giannini, Zentilin, Dulbecco, Vigneri, Scarlata, Savarino (CR16) 2008; 103 Habu, Maeda, Kusuda, Yoshino, Shio, Yamazaki (CR23) 2005; 40 Lundell (CR31) 2010; 24 CR13 Spechler, Lee, Ahnen, Goyal, Hirano, Ramirez (CR30) 2001; 285 CR33 Kahrilas, Shaheen, Vaezi (CR28) 2008; 135 Arguedas, Heudebert, Klapow, Centor, Eloubeidi, Wilcox (CR10) 2004; 99 Peery, Dellon, Lund, Crockett, McGowan, Bulsiewicz (CR1) 2012; 143 Levin, Schmittdiel, Kunz, Henning, Henke (CR5) 1997; 103 Epstein, Bojke, Sculpher (CR12) 2009; 339 Comay, Adam, da Silveira, Kennedy, Mayrand, Barkun (CR9) 2008; 22 Shaheen, Hansen, Morgan, Gangarosa, Ringel, Thiny (CR4) 2006; 101 El-Serag (CR2) 2007; 5 Chey, Mody, Wu, Chen, Kothari, Persson (CR37) 2009; 25 Chey, Inadomi, Booher, Sharma, Fendrick, Howden (CR38) 2005; 100 Ganz, Peters, Horgan, Bemelman, Dunst, Edmundowicz (CR34) 2013; 368 Gatenby, Bann (CR32) 2009; 64 Bretagne, Honnorat, Richard-Molard, Soufflet, Barthelemy (CR36) 2007; 25 Harewood, Gostout (CR22) 2003; 58 CR6 Husereau, Drummond, Petrou, Carswell, Moher, Greenberg (CR7) 2013; 16 Gosselin, Luo, Lohoues, Toy, Lewis, Crawley (CR25) 2009; 12 Remák, Brown, Yuen, Robinson (CR21) 2005; 21 Cookson, Flood, Koo, Mahon, Rhodes (CR11) 2005; 92 Bojke, Hornby, Sculpher (CR14) 2007; 25 Rotman, Bishop (CR29) 2013; 8 Everhart, Ruhl (CR3) 2009; 136 CR40 Doan, Lange, Elfant, Aguilar, Reyes, Lynn (CR18) 2008; 11 Grant, Boachie, Cotton, Faria, Bojke, Epstein (CR8) 2013; 17 You, Lee, Won, Anà, Wong, Chan (CR20) 2003; 17 Kahrilas, Shaheen, Vaezi, Hiltz, Black, Modlin (CR27) 2008; 135 Gawron, Pandolfino, Miskevics, Lavela (CR39) 2013; 28 JE Everhart (164_CR3) 2009; 136 RA Ganz (164_CR34) 2013; 368 TR Levin (164_CR5) 1997; 103 WD Chey (164_CR37) 2009; 25 D Epstein (164_CR12) 2009; 339 PJ Kahrilas (164_CR28) 2008; 135 HB El-Serag (164_CR2) 2007; 5 MR Arguedas (164_CR10) 2004; 99 AF Peery (164_CR1) 2012; 143 N Shaheen (164_CR4) 2006; 101 AJ Gawron (164_CR39) 2013; 28 JC Klapow (164_CR26) 2002; 34 164_CR6 E Remák (164_CR21) 2005; 21 AM Grant (164_CR8) 2013; 17 GC Harewood (164_CR22) 2003; 58 P Moayyedi (164_CR19) 2010; 105 164_CR33 164_CR13 P Gatenby (164_CR32) 2009; 64 TF Ahmed (164_CR35) 2006; 101 R Cookson (164_CR11) 2005; 92 PJ Kahrilas (164_CR27) 2008; 135 QV Doan (164_CR18) 2008; 11 JF Bretagne (164_CR36) 2007; 25 D Comay (164_CR9) 2008; 22 JHS You (164_CR20) 2003; 17 WD Chey (164_CR38) 2005; 100 F Baldi (164_CR24) 2006; 38 R Goeree (164_CR15) 2011; 14 SJ Spechler (164_CR30) 2001; 285 D Husereau (164_CR7) 2013; 16 JHS You (164_CR17) 2006; 41 EG Giannini (164_CR16) 2008; 103 Y Habu (164_CR23) 2005; 40 L Bojke (164_CR14) 2007; 25 A Gosselin (164_CR25) 2009; 12 L Lundell (164_CR31) 2010; 24 SR Rotman (164_CR29) 2013; 8 164_CR40 19654097 - BMJ. 2009;339:b2576 19530980 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78 11343480 - JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2331-8 11960060 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 May-Jun;34(5):509-15 16631423 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):452-8 17887805 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41 17373921 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr 1;25(7):823-33 21126706 - Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;24(6):947-59 23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(22):1-167 18801365 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1392-1413, 1413.e1-5 12641500 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar 15;17(6):785-92 14520279 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):493-9 23538175 - Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50 23425164 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27 18560633 - Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;22(6):552-8 18789939 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1383-1391, 1391.e1-5 9428836 - Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):520-8 23418510 - PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56060 16542282 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):470-8 16848807 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38 18289194 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):267-75 20842110 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6 15180720 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8 16322946 - J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;40(11):1029-35 17142109 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):17-26 18796263 - Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv 19365317 - Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):169-81 16238890 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1505-17 19450108 - J Med Econ. 2008;11(1):23-40 15929751 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1237-42 22650250 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:58 19895371 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):34-9 16373272 - Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):21-9 22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3 23400526 - J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):930-7 21402295 - Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):263-73 19124023 - Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):376-86 15852426 - Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):700-6 |
References_xml | – volume: 38 start-page: 452 year: 2006 end-page: 458 ident: CR24 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of different diagnostic strategies to assess gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with unexplained chronic persistent cough in Italy publication-title: Dig Liver Dis doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015 – volume: 34 start-page: 509 year: 2002 end-page: 515 ident: CR26 article-title: Characterization of long-term outcomes after Toupet fundoplication: symptoms, medication use, and health status publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006 – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 2013 end-page: 167 ident: CR8 article-title: Clinical and economic evaluation of laparoscopic surgery compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: 5-year follow-up of multicentre randomised trial (the REFLUX trial) publication-title: Health Technol Assess – volume: 40 start-page: 1029 year: 2005 end-page: 1035 ident: CR23 article-title: “Proton-pump inhibitor-first” strategy versus “step-up” strategy for the acute treatment of reflux esophagitis: a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan publication-title: J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y – volume: 135 start-page: 1383 year: 2008 end-page: 1391 ident: CR27 article-title: American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045 – volume: 135 start-page: 1392 year: 2008 end-page: 1413 ident: CR28 article-title: American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044 – volume: 25 start-page: 1869 year: 2009 end-page: 1878 ident: CR37 article-title: Treatment patterns and symptom control in patients with GERD: US community-based survey publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745 – volume: 64 start-page: 169 year: 2009 end-page: 181 ident: CR32 article-title: Antireflux surgery publication-title: Minerva Chir – volume: 41 start-page: 21 year: 2006 end-page: 29 ident: CR17 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of “test and treat” for patients with typical reflux symptoms in a population with a high prevalence of infection: a Markov model analysis publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/00365520510023873 – volume: 17 start-page: 785 year: 2003 end-page: 792 ident: CR20 article-title: Low-dose or standard-dose proton pump inhibitors for maintenance therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x – volume: 8 start-page: e56060 year: 2013 ident: CR29 article-title: Proton pump inhibitor use in the U.S. ambulatory setting, 2002–2009 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056060 – volume: 339 start-page: b2576 year: 2009 ident: CR12 article-title: Laparoscopic fundoplication compared with medical management for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: cost effectiveness study publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576 – volume: 136 start-page: 376 year: 2009 end-page: 386 ident: CR3 article-title: Burden of digestive diseases in the United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal diseases publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015 – volume: 143 start-page: 1179 year: 2012 end-page: 1187 ident: CR1 article-title: Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002 – ident: CR33 – volume: 101 start-page: 2128 year: 2006 end-page: 2138 ident: CR4 article-title: The burden of gastrointestinal and liver diseases, 2006 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x – ident: CR6 – volume: 99 start-page: 1023 year: 2004 end-page: 1028 ident: CR10 article-title: Re-examination of the cost-effectiveness of surgical versus medical therapy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: the value of long-term data collection publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x – volume: 285 start-page: 2331 year: 2001 end-page: 2338 ident: CR30 article-title: Long-term outcome of medical and surgical therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: follow-up of a randomized controlled trial publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331 – volume: 103 start-page: 520 issue: 6 year: 1997 end-page: 528 ident: CR5 article-title: Costs of acid-related disorders to a health maintenance organization publication-title: Am J Med doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2 – ident: CR40 – volume: 5 start-page: 17 year: 2007 end-page: 26 ident: CR2 article-title: Time trends of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016 – volume: 92 start-page: 700 year: 2005 end-page: 706 ident: CR11 article-title: Short-term cost effectiveness and long-term cost analysis comparing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with proton-pump inhibitor maintenance for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.4933 – volume: 16 start-page: 231 year: 2013 end-page: 250 ident: CR7 article-title: Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 – volume: 103 start-page: 267 year: 2008 end-page: 275 ident: CR16 article-title: Management strategy for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparison between empirical treatment with esomeprazole and endoscopy-oriented treatment publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x – volume: 21 start-page: 1505 year: 2005 end-page: 1517 ident: CR21 article-title: Cost-effectiveness comparison of current proton-pump inhibitors to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in the UK publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin doi: 10.1185/030079905X65330 – volume: 11 start-page: 23 year: 2008 end-page: 40 ident: CR18 article-title: Disease-specific cost savings of treating nighttime versus daytime gastroesophageal reflux disease in an employed population publication-title: J Med Econ doi: 10.3111/13696990701815545 – volume: 368 start-page: 719 year: 2013 end-page: 727 ident: CR34 article-title: Esophageal sphincter device for gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544 – volume: 100 start-page: 1237 year: 2005 end-page: 1242 ident: CR38 article-title: Primary-care physicians’ perceptions and practices on the management of GERD: results of a national survey publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x – volume: 12 start-page: 34 year: 2009 end-page: 39 ident: CR25 article-title: The impact of proton pump inhibitor compliance on health-care resource utilization and costs in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x – ident: CR13 – volume: 105 start-page: 2341 year: 2010 end-page: 2346 ident: CR19 article-title: The gain in quality-adjusted life months by switching to esomeprazole in those with continued reflux symptoms in primary care: EncomPASS—a cluster-randomized trial publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368 – volume: 101 start-page: 470 year: 2006 end-page: 478 ident: CR35 article-title: Chronic laryngitis associated with gastroesophageal reflux: prospective assessment of differences in practice patterns between gastroenterologists and ENT physicians publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x – volume: 25 start-page: 829 year: 2007 end-page: 841 ident: CR14 article-title: A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003 – volume: 14 start-page: 263 year: 2011 end-page: 273 ident: CR15 article-title: Cost-utility of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus proton pump inhibitors for chronic and controlled gastroesophageal reflux disease: a 3-year prospective randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004 – volume: 58 start-page: 493 year: 2003 end-page: 499 ident: CR22 article-title: Cost analysis of endoscopic antireflux procedures: endoluminal plication vs. radiofrequency coagulation vs. treatment with a proton pump inhibitor publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 25 start-page: 823 year: 2007 end-page: 833 ident: CR36 article-title: Perceptions and practices on the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: results of a national survey comparing primary care physicians and gastroenterologists publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x – volume: 28 start-page: 930 year: 2013 end-page: 937 ident: CR39 article-title: Proton pump inhibitor prescriptions and subsequent use in US Veterans diagnosed with gastroesophageal reflux disease publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0 – volume: 22 start-page: 552 year: 2008 end-page: 558 ident: CR9 article-title: The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol – volume: 24 start-page: 947 year: 2010 end-page: 959 ident: CR31 article-title: Surgical therapy of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006 – volume: 5 start-page: 17 year: 2007 ident: 164_CR2 publication-title: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.09.016 – volume: 25 start-page: 1869 year: 2009 ident: 164_CR37 publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin doi: 10.1185/03007990903035745 – volume: 28 start-page: 930 year: 2013 ident: 164_CR39 publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2345-0 – volume: 136 start-page: 376 year: 2009 ident: 164_CR3 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.12.015 – volume: 12 start-page: 34 year: 2009 ident: 164_CR25 publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00399.x – volume: 14 start-page: 263 year: 2011 ident: 164_CR15 publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.09.004 – volume: 135 start-page: 1383 year: 2008 ident: 164_CR27 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.045 – volume: 16 start-page: 231 year: 2013 ident: 164_CR7 publication-title: Value Health doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 – volume: 105 start-page: 2341 year: 2010 ident: 164_CR19 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.368 – volume: 135 start-page: 1392 year: 2008 ident: 164_CR28 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.044 – volume: 41 start-page: 21 year: 2006 ident: 164_CR17 publication-title: Scand J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1080/00365520510023873 – volume: 143 start-page: 1179 year: 2012 ident: 164_CR1 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.002 – volume: 58 start-page: 493 year: 2003 ident: 164_CR22 publication-title: Gastrointest Endosc – volume: 25 start-page: 823 year: 2007 ident: 164_CR36 publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03265.x – volume: 100 start-page: 1237 year: 2005 ident: 164_CR38 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.41364.x – volume: 92 start-page: 700 year: 2005 ident: 164_CR11 publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.4933 – volume: 11 start-page: 23 year: 2008 ident: 164_CR18 publication-title: J Med Econ doi: 10.3111/13696990701815545 – volume: 21 start-page: 1505 year: 2005 ident: 164_CR21 publication-title: Curr Med Res Opin doi: 10.1185/030079905X65330 – volume: 103 start-page: 520 issue: 6 year: 1997 ident: 164_CR5 publication-title: Am J Med doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)00308-2 – volume: 25 start-page: 829 year: 2007 ident: 164_CR14 publication-title: Pharmacoeconomics doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003 – volume: 101 start-page: 2128 year: 2006 ident: 164_CR4 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00723.x – volume: 8 start-page: e56060 year: 2013 ident: 164_CR29 publication-title: PLoS One doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056060 – volume: 17 start-page: 1 year: 2013 ident: 164_CR8 publication-title: Health Technol Assess doi: 10.3310/hta17220 – volume: 40 start-page: 1029 year: 2005 ident: 164_CR23 publication-title: J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1007/s00535-005-1704-y – volume: 22 start-page: 552 year: 2008 ident: 164_CR9 publication-title: Can J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1155/2008/765458 – volume: 17 start-page: 785 year: 2003 ident: 164_CR20 publication-title: Aliment Pharmacol Ther doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01526.x – ident: 164_CR13 doi: 10.3310/hta12310 – volume: 339 start-page: b2576 year: 2009 ident: 164_CR12 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2576 – volume: 285 start-page: 2331 year: 2001 ident: 164_CR30 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.285.18.2331 – ident: 164_CR33 – ident: 164_CR40 – volume: 103 start-page: 267 year: 2008 ident: 164_CR16 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01659.x – volume: 99 start-page: 1023 year: 2004 ident: 164_CR10 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30891.x – volume: 101 start-page: 470 year: 2006 ident: 164_CR35 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00502.x – volume: 38 start-page: 452 year: 2006 ident: 164_CR24 publication-title: Dig Liver Dis doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2006.02.015 – volume: 368 start-page: 719 year: 2013 ident: 164_CR34 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205544 – volume: 64 start-page: 169 year: 2009 ident: 164_CR32 publication-title: Minerva Chir – volume: 34 start-page: 509 year: 2002 ident: 164_CR26 publication-title: J Clin Gastroenterol doi: 10.1097/00004836-200205000-00006 – volume: 24 start-page: 947 year: 2010 ident: 164_CR31 publication-title: Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2010.09.006 – ident: 164_CR6 – reference: 16631423 - Dig Liver Dis. 2006 Jul;38(7):452-8 – reference: 20842110 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov;105(11):2341-6 – reference: 16322946 - J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;40(11):1029-35 – reference: 23742987 - Health Technol Assess. 2013 Jun;17(22):1-167 – reference: 16373272 - Scand J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan;41(1):21-9 – reference: 9428836 - Am J Med. 1997 Dec;103(6):520-8 – reference: 23418510 - PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56060 – reference: 18801365 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1392-1413, 1413.e1-5 – reference: 19124023 - Gastroenterology. 2009 Feb;136(2):376-86 – reference: 18560633 - Can J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jun;22(6):552-8 – reference: 14520279 - Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Oct;58(4):493-9 – reference: 17142109 - Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Jan;5(1):17-26 – reference: 11343480 - JAMA. 2001 May 9;285(18):2331-8 – reference: 16848807 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Sep;101(9):2128-38 – reference: 19530980 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):1869-78 – reference: 23400526 - J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Jul;28(7):930-7 – reference: 15852426 - Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):700-6 – reference: 22885331 - Gastroenterology. 2012 Nov;143(5):1179-87.e1-3 – reference: 21402295 - Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):263-73 – reference: 15929751 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Jun;100(6):1237-42 – reference: 19654097 - BMJ. 2009;339:b2576 – reference: 16238890 - Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Oct;21(10):1505-17 – reference: 18289194 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Feb;103(2):267-75 – reference: 16542282 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar;101(3):470-8 – reference: 19450108 - J Med Econ. 2008;11(1):23-40 – reference: 23425164 - N Engl J Med. 2013 Feb 21;368(8):719-27 – reference: 23538175 - Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50 – reference: 21126706 - Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2010 Dec;24(6):947-59 – reference: 15180720 - Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jun;99(6):1023-8 – reference: 19895371 - Value Health. 2009 Jan-Feb;12(1):34-9 – reference: 18796263 - Health Technol Assess. 2008 Sep;12(31):1-181, iii-iv – reference: 22650250 - BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:58 – reference: 12641500 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Mar 15;17(6):785-92 – reference: 11960060 - J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002 May-Jun;34(5):509-15 – reference: 19365317 - Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):169-81 – reference: 18789939 - Gastroenterology. 2008 Oct;135(4):1383-1391, 1391.e1-5 – reference: 17887805 - Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41 – reference: 17373921 - Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Apr 1;25(7):823-33 |
SSID | ssj0006372 |
Score | 2.3181841 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Background
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the... Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the value of... Background Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) contributes to substantial medication use and costs worldwide. Economic evaluations provide insight into the... |
SourceID | proquest gale pubmed pascalfrancis crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 745 |
SubjectTerms | Biological and medical sciences Clinical outcomes Cost analysis Cost benefit analysis Cost estimates Data Interpretation, Statistical Diagnostic tests Digestive system Disease Disease management Dosage and administration Drug therapy Economy. Management Endoscopy Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - economics English language Esophagus Gastroenterology. Liver. Pancreas. Abdomen Gastroesophageal reflux Gastroesophageal Reflux - diagnosis Gastroesophageal Reflux - drug therapy Gastroesophageal Reflux - economics Gastroesophageal Reflux - surgery Health Administration Health and social institutions Health Care Costs Health care expenditures Health care policy Health Economics Health maintenance organizations Helicobacter infections Helicobacter Infections - economics Helicobacter Infections - microbiology Helicobacter pylori - isolation & purification HMOs Humans Laparoscopy Libraries Medical sciences Medical treatment Medicine Medicine & Public Health Methods Other diseases. Semiology Patients Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes Pharmacology. Drug treatments Prevention Prices and rates Proton pump inhibitors Proton Pump Inhibitors - administration & dosage Proton Pump Inhibitors - economics Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use Public Health Public health. Hygiene Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine Quality of Life Research Risk factors Studies Surgery Systematic Review |
Title | Economic Evaluations of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Medical Management |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40273-014-0164-8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24807469 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1566650474 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1549633212 |
Volume | 32 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db9QwDLdgewBpQjA-VthOQUJDglX0I03TJzTGjWkS02napHurkiZ5mq7Heiex_x67TVtOjL30oU3StHYcO7Z_BviQOLxvizQUqcpCblUcqljqUDqb8jzTmjs6h_x5Ic6u-fk8m_sDt8aHVfYysRXUpq7ojPwL2RmoTfCcf13-CqlqFHlXfQmNx7BN0GXE1fl8MLhw922LN7XFVXI0A3uvJqXOcQJyQUOaYjAED-XGvuSl885SNfinXFfi4j4d9B__abstnT6HZ16fZMcdA7yAR3axC0_6dONmFw5nHTj13RG7GnOtmiN2yGYjbPXdSzjvO7HpgADesNqxH6pZ3daW6h2g8MGXXVp3s_7Nvne-HeZ9PWyMpHkF16fTq5Oz0FdaCCvB5So0IsltUWgTOZfJpDKp0FFitER1T4ssdUg1ZZwuUqlyrm2knEplhdJO55nSUfoathb1wu4B46hiGItWVWwcN9oWuRGxqAprtNJKVQFE_X8uKw9DTtUwbsoBQLklTYmkKYk0pQzg09Bl2WFwPNT4IxGvpPWJ41bKpxng7AjpqjzOY54VQsosgP2Nlriuqo3Hkw3yD69OJIH0JTH27_mh9Au_KUc2DeD98JiGpmC2ha3X1Iaj2EtRaQjgTcdH4-CU4s9FEcDnnrH-Gvx_H_324am8g6dJy-kUt7gPW6vbtT1AXWqlJ-2Cwas8iSew_W16Mbv8AybcG9M |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VcigSQlAeDZRiJCgSbdRN7DjOAaGqD7ZPVWgr9Rbs2D5Vu0uzK9g_xW9kJo8NK6C3XhPbcTIPz2RmvgF4F3u87jIeSq6TUDgdhTpSJlTecZEmxghP_yHPzmX_UhxfJVdL8KuthaG0ylYnVorajgr6R75DfgZaEyIVn8ffQ-oaRdHVtoVGzRYnbvYDXbby09E-0vd9HB8eDPb6YdNVICykUJPQyjh1WWZsz_tExYXl0vRiaxSaNkYm3OMOtfUm40qnwrie9pqrAiXbpIk2PY7r3oP7gqNoUmX6XpdSInnVLKpq5pKi29lGUalUTxBwDDrulPMhRagWzsHmNHg41iVSxtctNf5l8_4Vr62OwcPH8KixX9luzXBPYMkNV2GlLW8uV2HzogbDnm2zQVfbVW6zTXbRwWTPnsJxO4kdzBHHSzby7IsuJzcjR_0VUNnhw746fz39yfbrWBJrYkusy9x5Bpd3QoPnsDwcDd0aMIEmjXXoxUXWC2tclloZySJz1mijdRFAr_3OedHAnlP3jet8DthckSZH0uREmlwF8HE-ZVxjftw2-AMRLyd9gOsWuilrwN0Rsla-m0YiyaRSSQDrCyNRjouF2xsL5J8_OlYEChhHOL_lh7xRNGXeiUUAb-e3aWlKnhu60ZTGCFSzHI2UAF7UfNQtTpACQmYBbLWM9cfi_3vpl7dv5Q2s9Adnp_np0fnJK3gQV1xPOZPrsDy5mbrXaMdNzEYlPAy-3bW0_gZJ71dx |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VIgESQlAeDZRiJCgSNOomdhzngFDV7dIHVCvUSr0FO7ZP1e622RXsX-PXMZPHhhXQW6-J7TiZh2cyM98AvIk9XncZDyXXSSicjkIdKRMq77hIE2OEp_-QX0_kwZk4Ok_OV-BXWwtDaZWtTqwUtR0X9I98h_wMtCZEKnZ8kxYx7A8-TS5D6iBFkda2nUbNIsdu_gPdt_LjYR9p_TaOB_unewdh02EgLKRQ09DKOHVZZmzP-0TFheXS9GJrFJo5Ribc42619SbjSqfCuJ72mqsCpdykiTY9juvegtspTxXJmNrr0kskrxpHVY1dUnRB24gqle0JApFBJ57yP6QI1dKZ2JwM9ye6RCr5ur3Gv-zfv2K31ZE4eAgPGluW7dbM9whW3GgN7ralzuUabA1rYOz5Njvt6rzKbbbFhh1k9vwxHLWT2P4CfbxkY88-63J6NXbUawEVHz7sm_MXs5-sX8eVWBNnYl0WzxM4uxEaPIXV0Xjk1oEJNG-sQ48usl5Y47LUykgWmbNGG62LAHrtd86LBgKdOnFc5Avw5oo0OZImJ9LkKoD3iymTGv_jusHviHg56QZct9BNiQPujlC28t00EkkmlUoC2FgaiTJdLN3eXCL_4tGxIoDAOML5LT_kjdIp805EAni9uE1LUyLdyI1nNEagyuVosATwrOajbnGCFxAyC-BDy1h_LP6_l35-_VZewR2U0_zL4cnxC7gXV0xP6ZMbsDq9mrmXaNJNzWYlOwy-37Sw_gZ6qlun |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic+Evaluations+of+Gastroesophageal+Reflux+Disease+Medical+Management&rft.jtitle=PharmacoEconomics&rft.au=GAWRON%2C+Andrew+J&rft.au=FRENCH%2C+Dustin+D&rft.au=PANDOLFINO%2C+John+E&rft.au=HOWDEN%2C+Colin+W&rft.date=2014-08-01&rft.pub=Adis+International&rft.issn=1170-7690&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=758&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40273-014-0164-8&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=28609521 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1170-7690&client=summon |