Preoperative MRI of the Breast (POMB) Influences Primary Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study
Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoper...
Saved in:
Published in | World journal of surgery Vol. 38; no. 7; pp. 1685 - 1693 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Boston
Springer US
01.07.2014
Springer Nature B.V |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Methods
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (
n
= 220) or no breast MRI (
n
= 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences.
Results
In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (
p
< 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusions
Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Methods
This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large‐volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences.
Results
In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups.
Conclusions
Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI‐related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI ( n = 220) or no breast MRI ( n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group ( p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. Abstract Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large‐volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI ( n = 220) or no breast MRI ( n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group ( p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI‐related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] BACKGROUNDBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODSThis prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. RESULTSIn patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONSPreoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced. |
Author | Karlsson, Anders Arver, Brita Iliescu, Gabriela Gonzalez, Virginia Sandelin, Kerstin Löfgren, Lars Åberg, Wiveca Eriksson, Staffan |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Virginia surname: Gonzalez fullname: Gonzalez, Virginia email: virginia.gonzalez@ltv.se organization: Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital – sequence: 2 givenname: Kerstin surname: Sandelin fullname: Sandelin, Kerstin organization: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet – sequence: 3 givenname: Anders surname: Karlsson fullname: Karlsson, Anders organization: Department of Radiology, Capio St Göran’s Hospital – sequence: 4 givenname: Wiveca surname: Åberg fullname: Åberg, Wiveca organization: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet – sequence: 5 givenname: Lars surname: Löfgren fullname: Löfgren, Lars organization: Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran’s Hospital – sequence: 6 givenname: Gabriela surname: Iliescu fullname: Iliescu, Gabriela organization: Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital – sequence: 7 givenname: Staffan surname: Eriksson fullname: Eriksson, Staffan organization: Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital – sequence: 8 givenname: Brita surname: Arver fullname: Arver, Brita organization: Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24817517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:129557371$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index |
BookMark | eNqFklFv0zAQxy00xLrBB-AFWeJlSAvc2YkT87ZWGxStWrUN8Wg5yQUy0qTYCVP3xjfHpe2GkCaeHNm_3193lztge23XEmMvEd4iQPrOAwiVRYBxJBQkETxhI4yliIQUco-NQKrwIlHuswPvbwAwVaCesX0RZ5gmmI7Yr7mjbknO9vVP4rPLKe8q3n8jPnZkfc-P5hez8Rs-batmoLYgz-euXli34tcB6BfU9rxud_TEBsS95yeB6vySinXqMb-0bdkt6jsqj_lsaPq6CBo5ftUP5eo5e1rZxtOL7XnIPp-dXk8-RucXH6aTk_OoULGSkSaSkMkEtcJMYJxDZYvMao05aBWXlGghK8w0FCTCDFBkIk_TIrexBpuX8pBFm1x_S8shN8tNH6aztdlefQ9fZBKBSurA60f5pevKB2knotBJksoUg3u0cQP4YyDfm0XtC2oa21I3eINJnCkJoZmAvv4HvekG14ZJ_KEwFaDXgbihijBX76i6LwfBrHfBbHbBhF0w610wEJxX2-QhX1B5b-x-_kOHt3VDq_8nmi-frsZnoDTI4IrtdILWfiX3V9mPVvQbGNbQsQ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2015_09_006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_016_4326_2 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmrs_95 crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2019182947 crossref_primary_10_1177_1178223420948477 crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31891_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2019_05_008 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109585 crossref_primary_10_1177_08465371231184769 crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12946 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6440952 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07531_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2015_08_028 crossref_primary_10_4236_abcr_2023_122005 crossref_primary_10_1093_jbi_wbac088 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_020_01865_0 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2017_05_012 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4426_y crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2021204124 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_019_0171_0 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08832_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4324_3 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2018_06_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000000254 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_020_06065_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2024_02_021 crossref_primary_10_2217_cer_15_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12609_016_0205_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_currproblcancer_2023_100967 crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_3984_2018_0064 crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13104 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4205_9 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zrab088 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_017_1197_1 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11547_019_01008_w crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_017_5840_4 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28942 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08240_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_09600_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2022_101843 crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185118787354 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_05_017 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_19_03257 crossref_primary_10_9738_INTSURG_D_20_00012_1 crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000147 crossref_primary_10_1515_hmbci_2017_0041 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_023_06884_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_016_0143_2 crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_5_1_015003 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_018_4732_z crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_04_035 crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography8030125 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2024_102095 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2019_01_002 crossref_primary_10_1111_1754_9485_12430 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_015_3807_z crossref_primary_10_1177_08465371211030944 crossref_primary_10_1177_00031348231174019 crossref_primary_10_14449_jbd_2020_8_1_19 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2019_03_005 crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_3984_2015_0124 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_16_17038 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109058 crossref_primary_10_4048_jbc_2022_25_e35 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2016_11_004 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_110051 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_06824_7 crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13766 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2015_01_028 crossref_primary_10_5812_iranjradiol_60176 crossref_primary_10_1177_1457496917701669 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1154680 crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18629 crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000138 crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_13067 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_661945 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009 10.1002/bjs.5052 10.1002/bjs.9085 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00010 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5 10.2214/AJR.10.6049 10.1002/cncr.11490 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008 10.1155/2013/964863 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035 10.7326/0003‐4819‐138‐3‐200302040‐00008 10.1016/S0140‐6736(09)62070‐5 10.1097/00000658‐199911000‐00010 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)02368-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014 – notice: 2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie |
DBID | CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 3V. 7QO 7T5 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8FD 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA BENPR CCPQU FR3 FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P P64 PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS |
DOI | 10.1007/s00268-014-2605-0 |
DatabaseName | Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed CrossRef ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Technology Research Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) Medical Database Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition MEDLINE - Academic SwePub SwePub Articles |
DatabaseTitle | MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) CrossRef Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Complete Health Research Premium Collection ProQuest Medical Library Biotechnology Research Abstracts ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Immunology Abstracts Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | CrossRef Technology Research Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1432-2323 |
EndPage | 1693 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_swepub_ki_se_521639 oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_129557371 3383418231 10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0 24817517 WJSBF06903 |
Genre | article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Uppsala University, Västerås – fundername: Stockholm County Council – fundername: Center for Clinical Research – fundername: King Gustaf V’s Jubilee Foundation – fundername: Capio St Göran´s Hospital Research Foundation – fundername: Swedish Surgical Society – fundername: Västmanland County Council – fundername: Independent Order of Odd Fellow Stockholm, Percy Falk Foundation – fundername: CKF – fundername: The Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO) |
GroupedDBID | --- -53 -5E -5G -BR -EM -Y2 -~C .55 .86 .GJ .VR 06C 06D 0R~ 0VY 123 199 1N0 1SB 2.D 203 28- 29R 29~ 2J2 2JN 2JY 2KG 2KM 2LR 2P1 2VQ 2~H 30V 36B 3O- 3V. 4.4 406 408 409 40D 40E 53G 5QI 5VS 67Z 6NX 78A 7X7 88E 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8TC 8UJ 95- 95. 95~ 96X AAAVM AABHQ AABYN AAFGU AAHNG AAIAL AAJKR AAKSU AANXM AANZL AAPBV AAQQT AARHV AARTL AATNV AATVU AAUYE AAWCG AAYFA AAYIU AAYQN AAYTO ABBBX ABBXA ABDZT ABECU ABFGW ABFTV ABHLI ABHQN ABIPD ABJNI ABJOX ABKAS ABKCH ABKTR ABLJU ABMNI ABMQK ABNWP ABOCM ABPLI ABPTK ABQBU ABSXP ABTEG ABTKH ABTMW ABULA ABUWG ABWNU ABXPI ACBMV ACBRV ACBXY ACBYP ACGFS ACHSB ACHVE ACHXU ACIGE ACIPQ ACIWK ACKNC ACMDZ ACMLO ACOKC ACOMO ACPRK ACTTH ACUDM ACVWB ACWMK ADBBV ADHHG ADHIR ADIMF ADINQ ADJJI ADKNI ADKPE ADMDM ADOXG ADRFC ADTPH ADURQ ADYFF ADZKW AEBTG AEEQQ AEFIE AEFTE AEGAL AEGNC AEJHL AEJRE AEKMD AENEX AEOHA AEPYU AEQTP AESKC AESTI AETLH AEVLU AEVTX AEXYK AFAFS AFEXP AFFNX AFJLC AFKRA AFLOW AFNRJ AFQWF AFRAH AFWTZ AFZKB AGAYW AGDGC AGGBP AGGDS AGJBK AGKHE AGMZJ AGQMX AGWIL AGWZB AGYKE AHAVH AHBYD AHIZS AHMBA AHSBF AHVUH AHYZX AIAKS AIIXL AILAN AIMYW AITGF AJBLW AJDOV AJRNO AJZVZ AKMHD AKQUC ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALWAN AMKLP AMXSW AMYLF AMYQR AOCGG ARMRJ ASPBG AVWKF AXYYD AZFZN B-. BA0 BBWZM BDATZ BENPR BGNMA BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 CSCUP DDRTE DL5 DNIVK DPUIP DU5 EBD EBLON EBS EIOEI EJD EMB EMOBN EN4 ESBYG F5P FEDTE FERAY FFXSO FIGPU FINBP FNLPD FRRFC FSGXE FWDCC FYUFA G-Y G-Z GGCAI GGRSB GJIRD GNWQR GQ6 GQ7 GQ8 GRRUI GXS HF~ HG5 HG6 HMCUK HMJXF HQYDN HRMNR HVGLF HZ~ I09 IHE IJ- IKXTQ IMOTQ ITM IWAJR IXC IZIGR IZQ I~X I~Z J-C J0Z J5H JBSCW JCJTX JZLTJ KDC KOV KOW KPH L7B LAS LLZTM M1P M4Y MA- N2Q N9A NB0 NDZJH NPVJJ NQJWS NU0 O9- O93 O9G O9I O9J OAM OVD P19 P2P P9S PF0 PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PT4 PT5 Q2X QOK QOR QOS R4E R89 R9I RHV RIG RNI ROL RPX RRX RSV RZK S16 S1Z S26 S27 S28 S37 S3B SAP SCLPG SDE SDH SDM SHX SISQX SJYHP SMD SNE SNPRN SNX SOHCF SOJ SPISZ SRMVM SSLCW SSXJD STPWE SV3 SZ9 SZN T13 T16 TEORI TSG TSK TSV TT1 TUC U2A U9L UG4 UKHRP UNUBA UOJIU UTJUX UZXMN VC2 VFIZW W23 W48 WH7 WJK WK8 WXSBR X7M YLTOR Z45 Z7U Z7V Z7X Z81 Z82 Z83 Z87 Z8O Z8P Z8U Z8V Z8W Z91 Z92 ZA5 ZGI ZMTXR ZOVNA ~EX 1OC AACDK AAEOY AAJBT ABAKF ABQWH ACZOJ ADIYS AEFQL AFBBN AFFPM AGQEE AHBTC AIGIU AITYG ALIPV ALUQN H13 HGLYW MEWTI SUPJJ AAYZH CGR CUY CVF DCZOG ECM EIF NPM AAYXX CITATION 7QO 7T5 7XB 8FD 8FK FR3 H94 K9. P64 PQEST PQUKI 7X8 ADTPV AOWAS |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6463-9ee3083519618214b0fac8a991b0964de5923f1890ce24321282b77cba490abd3 |
IEDL.DBID | AGYKE |
ISSN | 0364-2313 1432-2323 |
IngestDate | Tue Nov 12 03:39:24 EST 2024 Wed Oct 30 05:07:53 EDT 2024 Fri Oct 25 01:49:07 EDT 2024 Thu Oct 10 20:46:45 EDT 2024 Thu Sep 12 18:47:03 EDT 2024 Tue Oct 15 23:48:02 EDT 2024 Sat Aug 24 00:48:45 EDT 2024 Sat Dec 16 12:01:11 EST 2023 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | Magnetic Resonance Imaging Breast Density Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination Sentinel Node Biopsy Reoperation Rate |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6463-9ee3083519618214b0fac8a991b0964de5923f1890ce24321282b77cba490abd3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-News-2 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 24817517 |
PQID | 1548172091 |
PQPubID | 47185 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_521639 swepub_primary_oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_129557371 proquest_miscellaneous_1548630519 proquest_journals_1548172091 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0 pubmed_primary_24817517 wiley_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0_WJSBF06903 springer_journals_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0 |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2014 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2014 text: July 2014 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Boston |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Boston – name: United States – name: Lupsingen |
PublicationSubtitle | Official Journal of the International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie |
PublicationTitle | World journal of surgery |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | World J Surg |
PublicationTitleAlternate | World J Surg |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | Springer US Springer Nature B.V |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer US – name: Springer Nature B.V |
References | Van Goethem, Tjalma, Schelfout (CR4) 2006; 32 Atkins, Appleton, Fisher (CR8) 2013; 2013 Rodenko, Harms, Pruneda (CR2) 1996; 167 Saslow, Boetes, Burke (CR7) 2007; 57 Drew, Turnbull, Chatterjee (CR1) 1999; 230 Peters, van Esser, van den Bosch (CR18) 2011; 47 Bergkvist, Frisell (CR13) 2005; 92 CR15 Houssami, Turner, Morrow (CR9) 2013; 257 CR12 Bedrosian, Mick, Orel (CR16) 2003; 98 Plevritis, Kurian, Sigal (CR6) 2006; 295 Turnbull, Brown, Harvey (CR17) 2010; 375 Carney, Miglioretti, Bonnie (CR3) 2003; 138 Andersson, Frisell, Sylvan (CR14) 2013; 100 Wolfe, Albert, Belle (CR11) 1983; 21 Kuhl, Kuhn, Braun (CR19) 2007; 16 Berg, Gutierrez, NessAiver (CR5) 2004; 233 Checka, Chun, Schnabel (CR10) 2012; 198 2004; 233 2012; 198 2003; 138 2013; 2013 2006; 32 1999; 230 2006; 295 1983; 21 2013; 100 2010; 375 2013; 257 2005; 92 2011; 47 1996; 167 2007; 57 2003; 98 2007; 16 10561092 - Ann Surg. 1999 Nov;230(5):680-5 8956569 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Dec;167(6):1415-9 17959382 - Breast. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 2:S34-44 17392385 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89 21195605 - Eur J Cancer. 2011 Apr;47(6):879-86 15988791 - Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1221-4 23476649 - J Oncol. 2013;2013:964863 12879462 - Cancer. 2003 Aug 1;98(3):468-73 16920327 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov;32(9):901-10 6836099 - Radiol Clin North Am. 1983 Mar;21(1):127-36 16720823 - JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84 22358028 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):W292-5 12558355 - Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75 23436699 - Br J Surg. 2013 May;100(6):775-83 20159292 - Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):563-71 15486214 - Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):830-49 23187751 - Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):249-55 e_1_2_8_16_2 e_1_2_8_17_2 e_1_2_8_18_2 e_1_2_8_19_2 e_1_2_8_12_2 e_1_2_8_13_2 e_1_2_8_14_2 e_1_2_8_15_2 e_1_2_8_9_2 e_1_2_8_2_2 e_1_2_8_4_2 e_1_2_8_3_2 e_1_2_8_6_2 e_1_2_8_5_2 e_1_2_8_8_2 e_1_2_8_7_2 e_1_2_8_20_2 e_1_2_8_10_2 e_1_2_8_11_2 |
References_xml | – volume: 257 start-page: 249 year: 2013 end-page: 255 ident: CR9 article-title: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer meta-analysis of surgical outcomes publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17 contributor: fullname: Morrow – volume: 32 start-page: 901 issue: 9 year: 2006 end-page: 910 ident: CR4 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009 contributor: fullname: Schelfout – volume: 92 start-page: 1221 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 1224 ident: CR13 article-title: Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.5052 contributor: fullname: Frisell – volume: 100 start-page: 775 issue: 6 year: 2013 end-page: 783 ident: CR14 article-title: Causes of false-negative sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer publication-title: Br J Surg doi: 10.1002/bjs.9085 contributor: fullname: Sylvan – ident: CR15 – ident: CR12 – volume: 21 start-page: 127 year: 1983 end-page: 136 ident: CR11 article-title: Brest parenchymal patterns and their relationship to risk for having or developing carcinoma publication-title: Radiol Clin North Am contributor: fullname: Belle – volume: 233 start-page: 830 year: 2004 end-page: 849 ident: CR5 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 contributor: fullname: NessAiver – volume: 16 start-page: S34 year: 2007 end-page: S44 ident: CR19 article-title: Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? publication-title: Breast doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014 contributor: fullname: Braun – volume: 57 start-page: 75 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 89 ident: CR7 article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 contributor: fullname: Burke – volume: 230 start-page: 680 issue: 5 year: 1999 ident: CR1 article-title: Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesion publication-title: Ann Surg doi: 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00010 contributor: fullname: Chatterjee – volume: 375 start-page: 563 year: 2010 end-page: 571 ident: CR17 article-title: Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5 contributor: fullname: Harvey – volume: 198 start-page: 292 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 295 ident: CR10 article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: implication for breast cancer screening publication-title: Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049 contributor: fullname: Schnabel – volume: 98 start-page: 468 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 473 ident: CR16 article-title: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Cancer doi: 10.1002/cncr.11490 contributor: fullname: Orel – volume: 167 start-page: 1415 issue: 6 year: 1996 end-page: 1419 ident: CR2 article-title: MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology publication-title: Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569 contributor: fullname: Pruneda – volume: 138 start-page: 168 year: 2003 end-page: 175 ident: CR3 article-title: Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008 contributor: fullname: Bonnie – volume: 2013 start-page: 964863 year: 2013 ident: CR8 article-title: Which imaging modality is superior for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer? publication-title: J Oncol doi: 10.1155/2013/964863 contributor: fullname: Fisher – volume: 295 start-page: 2374 issue: 20 year: 2006 end-page: 2384 ident: CR6 article-title: Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374 contributor: fullname: Sigal – volume: 47 start-page: 879 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 886 ident: CR18 article-title: Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial publication-title: Eur J Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035 contributor: fullname: van den Bosch – volume: 47 start-page: 879 issue: 6 year: 2011 end-page: 886 article-title: Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONETߝrandomised controlled trial publication-title: Eur J Cancer – volume: 138 start-page: 168 year: 2003 end-page: 175 article-title: Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography publication-title: Ann Intern Med – volume: 57 start-page: 75 issue: 2 year: 2007 end-page: 89 article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin – volume: 98 start-page: 468 issue: 3 year: 2003 end-page: 473 article-title: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: Cancer – volume: 2013 start-page: 964863 year: 2013 article-title: Which imaging modality is superior for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer? publication-title: J Oncol – volume: 100 start-page: 775 issue: 6 year: 2013 end-page: 783 article-title: Causes of false‐negative sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 92 start-page: 1221 issue: 10 year: 2005 end-page: 1224 article-title: Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer publication-title: Br J Surg – volume: 295 start-page: 2374 issue: 20 year: 2006 end-page: 2384 article-title: Cost‐effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging publication-title: JAMA – volume: 230 start-page: 680 issue: 5 year: 1999 article-title: Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesion publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 257 start-page: 249 year: 2013 end-page: 255 article-title: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer meta‐analysis of surgical outcomes publication-title: Ann Surg – volume: 198 start-page: 292 issue: 3 year: 2012 end-page: 295 article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: implication for breast cancer screening publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 167 start-page: 1415 issue: 6 year: 1996 end-page: 1419 article-title: MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology publication-title: Am J Roentgenol – volume: 233 start-page: 830 year: 2004 end-page: 849 article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer publication-title: Radiology – volume: 16 start-page: S34 year: 2007 end-page: S44 article-title: Pre‐operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? publication-title: Breast – volume: 32 start-page: 901 issue: 9 year: 2006 end-page: 910 article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol – volume: 375 start-page: 563 year: 2010 end-page: 571 article-title: Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial publication-title: Lancet – volume: 21 start-page: 127 year: 1983 end-page: 136 article-title: Brest parenchymal patterns and their relationship to risk for having or developing carcinoma publication-title: Radiol Clin North Am – ident: e_1_2_8_10_2 doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17 – ident: e_1_2_8_4_2 doi: 10.7326/0003‐4819‐138‐3‐200302040‐00008 – ident: e_1_2_8_3_2 doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569 – ident: e_1_2_8_9_2 doi: 10.1155/2013/964863 – ident: e_1_2_8_18_2 doi: 10.1016/S0140‐6736(09)62070‐5 – ident: e_1_2_8_15_2 doi: 10.1002/bjs.9085 – ident: e_1_2_8_16_2 – ident: e_1_2_8_7_2 doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374 – ident: e_1_2_8_19_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035 – ident: e_1_2_8_5_2 doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009 – ident: e_1_2_8_8_2 doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75 – ident: e_1_2_8_17_2 doi: 10.1002/cncr.11490 – ident: e_1_2_8_6_2 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484 – ident: e_1_2_8_2_2 doi: 10.1097/00000658‐199911000‐00010 – ident: e_1_2_8_20_2 doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014 – ident: e_1_2_8_13_2 – ident: e_1_2_8_11_2 doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049 – ident: e_1_2_8_12_2 doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)02368-5 – ident: e_1_2_8_14_2 doi: 10.1002/bjs.5052 |
SSID | ssj0017606 |
Score | 2.4580727 |
Snippet | Background
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast... Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low... Abstract Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral... BACKGROUNDBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast... |
SourceID | swepub proquest crossref pubmed wiley springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Publisher |
StartPage | 1685 |
SubjectTerms | Abdominal Surgery Adult Axilla Breast Density Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - surgery Cardiac Surgery Chemotherapy, Adjuvant Female General Surgery Humans Lymph Node Excision Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination Mastectomy, Segmental Medicin och hälsovetenskap Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neoadjuvant Therapy Neoplasm Staging Patient Care Planning Preoperative Care Prospective Studies Reoperation Reoperation Rate Sentinel Node Biopsy Surgery Thoracic Surgery Vascular Surgery Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1LT9wwELYKvfSCqPpKS5GRKtQHUZ34lXCpWNQVINGuKKh7sxzHkVZVk2V3ObS3_vPOJHEA9cEhl2TixJ5x5nPm8wwhrzJWghkoEesCLFiAQ45z7fJYCmu19Va6LtvnJ3V0IU6mctr_cFv2tMrwTWw_1GXj8B_5e4TW4GzBvX2YX8ZYNQqjq30JjTVyP0mZQkqXng4LrkQr1scqRQw4hoeoJmuTiKYKaVxwRSF_7bZf-gNs3giUDklFb-PZ1iGNN8lGjyTpQaf6h-Serx-RX5OFb-a-S-dNT8-OaVNRwHh0hOTzFX09-Xw6ekOPQ2mSJZ106SboeWCc01kdpA_RJBb79ACkmrAnc4-e2bpsvs9--nKPtht4keHpFxQ5iT8ek4vxx_PDo7ivshA7JRSPc-854rAEa7-kiShYZV1mATcWsLwRpZeAAasky5nzqeDg6rK00NoVVuTMFiV_QtbrpvbPCK0yDy7f2cpyDBOzwmuAE56VgPGkUzIib8MYm3nXOzOkTW4VYkAhBhViWES2ghZMP6-W5toKIrIzXIYZgWEOW_vmqpNRHKFpRJ522hueluLtMtEReRfUeaPxf79K2ml8aAeTcqOHM_35bzM8zNIb6LCUmmt4wd2_3DTIoyxAJwCI0HprRncPifl68mU0xtzS_Pn_R-cFeZCibbe84i2yvlpc-ZeAnlbFdjtFfgP3mhHh priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Preoperative MRI of the Breast (POMB) Influences Primary Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-014-2605-0 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2605-0 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24817517 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1548172091 https://search.proquest.com/docview/1548630519 http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:129557371 |
Volume | 38 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9wwEBZpAqWXNH0lbtOgQil9xIttSZad227YbZKy6bLN0u1JSLYMyxI77OPQ3PrPO-MXCUkpORiDPJL1GFmfPDOfCHkfeSmoQchdaUCDOSzIbiyT2BVca6mtFknF9nkenkz42VRMN0jQ_rrI553GIll-qNtYN9wtoN8VdxGCu7BN36rjTre6X39967e2Axl6tYUSRJnPGlvmfYXcXo3uQMwb5tGWSvQ2ii2XocHTKjRwWbIXovfJvLNemU5yfZfb8QEt3CHbNSql3UqNnpENmz8nj4e13f0F-TNa2OLKVizhdDg-pUVGATrSHvq0r-jH0fdh7xM9bU48WdJRxWJBLxpHdjrLG-lj1LTFEe2CVNGEeh7Ssc7T4nJ2bdNDWsYFo-OoXVB0dfz9kkwG_YvjE7c-vMFNQh4yN7aWIbzz8UiZwOfGy3QSaYCjBnZNPLUCoGXmR7GX2IAzGMkoMFImRvPY0yZlr8hmXuR2j9AssoAkEp1phtZnz1gJKMV6KUBHkYTCIZ-bQVRXVetUy8ZcdqqCTlXYqcpzyH4zzKqerkuF-zZAcoCdHPKufQwTDa0nOrfFupIJGSJeh-xW6tG-LcDswpcO-dIM7Y3C_12VoFKpthzk-saFU9Xp8xleamkVNFgIySRU8MM9mVp5lIVpAbgTSi_19P9don6e_egNkLKavX5QA96QJwGqa-m9vE82V4u1fQsYbWUOyCM5lQf11IR7r38-GkPqJOj-BedjMNE |
link.rule.ids | 230,315,783,787,888,12068,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,41093,41535,42162,42604,43322,43817,52123,52246,74073,74630 |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELagHOBSgXilFDASQjwa4cSOnXBB3YrVbumWVdmKvVmO40grRLLsbg9w6z_vTBKHVrwOuSQTJ_aMM58z428IeZ6yAsxAilDlYMECHHKYKZuFiTBGGWcS27J9HsvRqTicJ_Puh9u6S6v038TmQ13UFv-Rv0VoDc4W3Nv75fcQq0ZhdLUroXGd3EAeLqxgoOb9gitSknWxShECjuE-qskaEtFYYhoXXJGYv3bVL_0GNi8FSntS0at4tnFIw9tku0OSdL9V_R1yzVV3yfl05eqla-m86eRkTOuSAsajA0w-39CX00-TwSs69qVJ1nTa0k3Qmc84p4vKSx-gSaze0X2Qqv2ezD16Yqqi_rb46Yo92mzgxQxPt6KYk_jjHjkdfpgdjMKuykJopZA8zJzjiMMirP0SRyJnpbGpAdyYw_JGFC4BDFhGacasiwUHV5fGuVI2NyJjJi_4fbJV1ZV7SGiZOnD51pSGY5iY5U4BnHCsAIyXWJkE5LUfY71se6d72uRGIRoUolEhmgVk12tBd_NqrX9ZQUCe9ZdhRmCYw1SuPmtlJEdoGpAHrfb6p8V4exKpgLzx6rzU-N9fJW413reDpNzo4XR3_usCD712GjqcJIoreMEXf7ipl0dZgE4AEKH1xoz-PyT6y-HnwRC5pfnOv0fnKbk5mk2O9NH4-OMjcitGO29yjHfJ1mZ15h4DktrkT5rpcgHmihTI |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELZgKyEuCMQrtICREOLRqN7EjhMuqFu66ha6REur9mY5jiOtKpJld3uAG_-cmcQOrXgdcknGTuwZe75kvswQ8jxlJZhBwkNZgAVzcMhhJk0WCq611FYL02X7nCYHJ_zwTJw5_tPK0Sr9nthu1GVj8Bv5DkJrcLbg3nYqR4vI34_fLb6GWEEKI62unMZ1siF5ErMB2RjtT_NZH1OQCXORSx4Cqol9jJO1KUWjBEldcCVBNttVL_Ub9LwUNu1TjF5Ft617Gt8mtxyupLudIdwh12x9l_zIl7ZZ2C65Nz2aTWhTUUB8dIRU9DV9mX86Gr2iE1-oZEXzLvkEPfb8czqvvfQeGsjyLd0Fqcb_oblNZ7oumy_z77bcpu3vvMj3tEuKDMVv98jJeP947yB0NRdCk8CshZm1MaKyIVaCiYa8YJU2qQYUWcDLDi-tAERYDdOMGRvxGBxfGhVSmkLzjOmijO-TQd3U9iGhVWoBABhd6RiDxqywEsCFZSUgPmESEZDXfo7Vohud6pMotwpRoBCFClEsIFteC8qtspX6ZRMBedZfhvWBQQ9d2-aikwFrgAEF5EGnvf5uETYXQxmQN16dlzr_-6NEncb7fjBFN_o75c6fz_FQK6tgwELIWMIDvvhDo14eZQFIAVyE3lsz-v-UqNPDz6MxZpqOH_17dp6SG7BW1MfJ9MMmuRmhmbeE4y0yWC8v7GOAVeviiVsvPwESuRpl |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative+MRI+of+the+breast+%28POMB%29+influences+primary+treatment+in+breast+cancer%3A+a+prospective%2C+randomized%2C+multicenter+study&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Gonzalez%2C+Virginia&rft.au=Sandelin%2C+Kerstin&rft.au=Karlsson%2C+Anders&rft.au=%C3%85berg%2C+Wiveca&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1693&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2605-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon |