Preoperative MRI of the Breast (POMB) Influences Primary Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study

Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoper...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inWorld journal of surgery Vol. 38; no. 7; pp. 1685 - 1693
Main Authors Gonzalez, Virginia, Sandelin, Kerstin, Karlsson, Anders, Åberg, Wiveca, Löfgren, Lars, Iliescu, Gabriela, Eriksson, Staffan, Arver, Brita
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Boston Springer US 01.07.2014
Springer Nature B.V
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI ( n  = 220) or no breast MRI ( n  = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group ( p  < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
AbstractList Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large‐volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI‐related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI ( n  = 220) or no breast MRI ( n  = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group ( p  < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
Abstract Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Methods This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large‐volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI ( n = 220) or no breast MRI ( n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. Results In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group ( p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Conclusions Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI‐related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
BACKGROUNDBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. METHODSThis prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. RESULTSIn patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONSPreoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low specificity, unnecessary mastectomies, and costs are arguments against MRI. The purpose of this study was to determine whether preoperative breast MRI would affect primary surgical management, reduce reexcision/reoperation procedures, and influence the choice of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 440 breast cancer patients younger than aged 56 years from three, Swedish, large-volume breast units. Patients were randomly allocated on a 1:1 basis to either preoperative staging with breast MRI (n = 220) or no breast MRI (n = 220) (control group). Treatment planning of all patients was discussed at multidisciplinary team conferences. In patients randomized to the MRI group, who had an observed higher percentage of planned breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared with the control group, a change from suggested breast conservation to mastectomy occurred in 23 of 153 (15 %) patients. Breast MRI provided additional information in 83 of 220 (38 %) patients, which caused a change in treatment plan in 40 (18 %). The breast reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MRI group: 11 of 220 (5 %) versus 33 of 220 (15 %) in the control group (p < 0.001). The number of mastectomies, axillary reoperations, and the number of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy after definitive treatment did not differ significantly between the groups. Preoperative staging with breast MRI in women younger than age 56 years altered the treatment plan in 18 % of the patients. Although a higher MRI-related conversion rate from breast conservation to mastectomy was found, the final numbers of mastectomies did not differ between the two groups. The breast reoperation rate in the MRI group was significantly reduced.
Author Karlsson, Anders
Arver, Brita
Iliescu, Gabriela
Gonzalez, Virginia
Sandelin, Kerstin
Löfgren, Lars
Åberg, Wiveca
Eriksson, Staffan
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Virginia
  surname: Gonzalez
  fullname: Gonzalez, Virginia
  email: virginia.gonzalez@ltv.se
  organization: Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Kerstin
  surname: Sandelin
  fullname: Sandelin, Kerstin
  organization: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Anders
  surname: Karlsson
  fullname: Karlsson, Anders
  organization: Department of Radiology, Capio St Göran’s Hospital
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Wiveca
  surname: Åberg
  fullname: Åberg, Wiveca
  organization: Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Lars
  surname: Löfgren
  fullname: Löfgren, Lars
  organization: Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran’s Hospital
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Gabriela
  surname: Iliescu
  fullname: Iliescu, Gabriela
  organization: Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Staffan
  surname: Eriksson
  fullname: Eriksson, Staffan
  organization: Department of Surgery, Västmanland County Hospital
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Brita
  surname: Arver
  fullname: Arver, Brita
  organization: Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24817517$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:129557371$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index
BookMark eNqFklFv0zAQxy00xLrBB-AFWeJlSAvc2YkT87ZWGxStWrUN8Wg5yQUy0qTYCVP3xjfHpe2GkCaeHNm_3193lztge23XEmMvEd4iQPrOAwiVRYBxJBQkETxhI4yliIQUco-NQKrwIlHuswPvbwAwVaCesX0RZ5gmmI7Yr7mjbknO9vVP4rPLKe8q3n8jPnZkfc-P5hez8Rs-batmoLYgz-euXli34tcB6BfU9rxud_TEBsS95yeB6vySinXqMb-0bdkt6jsqj_lsaPq6CBo5ftUP5eo5e1rZxtOL7XnIPp-dXk8-RucXH6aTk_OoULGSkSaSkMkEtcJMYJxDZYvMao05aBWXlGghK8w0FCTCDFBkIk_TIrexBpuX8pBFm1x_S8shN8tNH6aztdlefQ9fZBKBSurA60f5pevKB2knotBJksoUg3u0cQP4YyDfm0XtC2oa21I3eINJnCkJoZmAvv4HvekG14ZJ_KEwFaDXgbihijBX76i6LwfBrHfBbHbBhF0w610wEJxX2-QhX1B5b-x-_kOHt3VDq_8nmi-frsZnoDTI4IrtdILWfiX3V9mPVvQbGNbQsQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semradonc_2015_09_006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_016_4326_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmrs_95
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2019182947
crossref_primary_10_1177_1178223420948477
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_16_31891_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breast_2019_05_008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_109585
crossref_primary_10_1177_08465371231184769
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_12946
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6440952
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_019_07531_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_amjsurg_2015_08_028
crossref_primary_10_4236_abcr_2023_122005
crossref_primary_10_1093_jbi_wbac088
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_020_01865_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_acra_2017_05_012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4426_y
crossref_primary_10_1148_radiol_2021204124
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41391_019_0171_0
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_021_08832_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4324_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2018_06_002
crossref_primary_10_1097_RLI_0000000000000254
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_020_06065_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jacr_2024_02_021
crossref_primary_10_2217_cer_15_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12609_016_0205_8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_currproblcancer_2023_100967
crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_3984_2018_0064
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13104
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_017_4205_9
crossref_primary_10_1093_bjsopen_zrab088
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12957_017_1197_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11547_019_01008_w
crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_017_5840_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_jmri_28942
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_021_08240_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_023_09600_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2022_101843
crossref_primary_10_1177_0284185118787354
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinimag_2020_05_017
crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_19_03257
crossref_primary_10_9738_INTSURG_D_20_00012_1
crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000147
crossref_primary_10_1515_hmbci_2017_0041
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_023_06884_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40134_016_0143_2
crossref_primary_10_1117_1_JMI_5_1_015003
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10549_018_4732_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejso_2020_04_035
crossref_primary_10_3390_tomography8030125
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_suronc_2024_102095
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_femme_2019_01_002
crossref_primary_10_1111_1754_9485_12430
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_015_3807_z
crossref_primary_10_1177_08465371211030944
crossref_primary_10_1177_00031348231174019
crossref_primary_10_14449_jbd_2020_8_1_19
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2019_03_005
crossref_primary_10_1590_0100_3984_2015_0124
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_16_17038
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2020_109058
crossref_primary_10_4048_jbc_2022_25_e35
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clbc_2016_11_004
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejrad_2021_110051
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00330_020_06824_7
crossref_primary_10_1111_tbj_13766
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_breastdis_2015_01_028
crossref_primary_10_5812_iranjradiol_60176
crossref_primary_10_1177_1457496917701669
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1154680
crossref_primary_10_2214_AJR_17_18629
crossref_primary_10_1097_RMR_0000000000000138
crossref_primary_10_1111_ans_13067
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2021_661945
Cites_doi 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17
10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009
10.1002/bjs.5052
10.1002/bjs.9085
10.1148/radiol.2333031484
10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014
10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
10.1097/00000658-199911000-00010
10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5
10.2214/AJR.10.6049
10.1002/cncr.11490
10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569
10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
10.1155/2013/964863
10.1001/jama.295.20.2374
10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035
10.7326/0003‐4819‐138‐3‐200302040‐00008
10.1016/S0140‐6736(09)62070‐5
10.1097/00000658‐199911000‐00010
10.1016/S0033-8389(22)02368-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014
2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
Copyright_xml – notice: Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2014
– notice: 2014 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Société Internationale de Chirurgie
DBID CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
3V.
7QO
7T5
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
BENPR
CCPQU
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
DOI 10.1007/s00268-014-2605-0
DatabaseName Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
CrossRef
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
SwePub
SwePub Articles
DatabaseTitle MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
CrossRef
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
Health Research Premium Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

CrossRef
Technology Research Database
MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1432-2323
EndPage 1693
ExternalDocumentID oai_swepub_ki_se_521639
oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_129557371
3383418231
10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0
24817517
WJSBF06903
Genre article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Uppsala University, Västerås
– fundername: Stockholm County Council
– fundername: Center for Clinical Research
– fundername: King Gustaf V’s Jubilee Foundation
– fundername: Capio St Göran´s Hospital Research Foundation
– fundername: Swedish Surgical Society
– fundername: Västmanland County Council
– fundername: Independent Order of Odd Fellow Stockholm, Percy Falk Foundation
– fundername: CKF
– fundername: The Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO)
GroupedDBID ---
-53
-5E
-5G
-BR
-EM
-Y2
-~C
.55
.86
.GJ
.VR
06C
06D
0R~
0VY
123
199
1N0
1SB
2.D
203
28-
29R
29~
2J2
2JN
2JY
2KG
2KM
2LR
2P1
2VQ
2~H
30V
36B
3O-
3V.
4.4
406
408
409
40D
40E
53G
5QI
5VS
67Z
6NX
78A
7X7
88E
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8TC
8UJ
95-
95.
95~
96X
AAAVM
AABHQ
AABYN
AAFGU
AAHNG
AAIAL
AAJKR
AAKSU
AANXM
AANZL
AAPBV
AAQQT
AARHV
AARTL
AATNV
AATVU
AAUYE
AAWCG
AAYFA
AAYIU
AAYQN
AAYTO
ABBBX
ABBXA
ABDZT
ABECU
ABFGW
ABFTV
ABHLI
ABHQN
ABIPD
ABJNI
ABJOX
ABKAS
ABKCH
ABKTR
ABLJU
ABMNI
ABMQK
ABNWP
ABOCM
ABPLI
ABPTK
ABQBU
ABSXP
ABTEG
ABTKH
ABTMW
ABULA
ABUWG
ABWNU
ABXPI
ACBMV
ACBRV
ACBXY
ACBYP
ACGFS
ACHSB
ACHVE
ACHXU
ACIGE
ACIPQ
ACIWK
ACKNC
ACMDZ
ACMLO
ACOKC
ACOMO
ACPRK
ACTTH
ACUDM
ACVWB
ACWMK
ADBBV
ADHHG
ADHIR
ADIMF
ADINQ
ADJJI
ADKNI
ADKPE
ADMDM
ADOXG
ADRFC
ADTPH
ADURQ
ADYFF
ADZKW
AEBTG
AEEQQ
AEFIE
AEFTE
AEGAL
AEGNC
AEJHL
AEJRE
AEKMD
AENEX
AEOHA
AEPYU
AEQTP
AESKC
AESTI
AETLH
AEVLU
AEVTX
AEXYK
AFAFS
AFEXP
AFFNX
AFJLC
AFKRA
AFLOW
AFNRJ
AFQWF
AFRAH
AFWTZ
AFZKB
AGAYW
AGDGC
AGGBP
AGGDS
AGJBK
AGKHE
AGMZJ
AGQMX
AGWIL
AGWZB
AGYKE
AHAVH
AHBYD
AHIZS
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHVUH
AHYZX
AIAKS
AIIXL
AILAN
AIMYW
AITGF
AJBLW
AJDOV
AJRNO
AJZVZ
AKMHD
AKQUC
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALWAN
AMKLP
AMXSW
AMYLF
AMYQR
AOCGG
ARMRJ
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXYYD
AZFZN
B-.
BA0
BBWZM
BDATZ
BENPR
BGNMA
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
CSCUP
DDRTE
DL5
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EIOEI
EJD
EMB
EMOBN
EN4
ESBYG
F5P
FEDTE
FERAY
FFXSO
FIGPU
FINBP
FNLPD
FRRFC
FSGXE
FWDCC
FYUFA
G-Y
G-Z
GGCAI
GGRSB
GJIRD
GNWQR
GQ6
GQ7
GQ8
GRRUI
GXS
HF~
HG5
HG6
HMCUK
HMJXF
HQYDN
HRMNR
HVGLF
HZ~
I09
IHE
IJ-
IKXTQ
IMOTQ
ITM
IWAJR
IXC
IZIGR
IZQ
I~X
I~Z
J-C
J0Z
J5H
JBSCW
JCJTX
JZLTJ
KDC
KOV
KOW
KPH
L7B
LAS
LLZTM
M1P
M4Y
MA-
N2Q
N9A
NB0
NDZJH
NPVJJ
NQJWS
NU0
O9-
O93
O9G
O9I
O9J
OAM
OVD
P19
P2P
P9S
PF0
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PT4
PT5
Q2X
QOK
QOR
QOS
R4E
R89
R9I
RHV
RIG
RNI
ROL
RPX
RRX
RSV
RZK
S16
S1Z
S26
S27
S28
S37
S3B
SAP
SCLPG
SDE
SDH
SDM
SHX
SISQX
SJYHP
SMD
SNE
SNPRN
SNX
SOHCF
SOJ
SPISZ
SRMVM
SSLCW
SSXJD
STPWE
SV3
SZ9
SZN
T13
T16
TEORI
TSG
TSK
TSV
TT1
TUC
U2A
U9L
UG4
UKHRP
UNUBA
UOJIU
UTJUX
UZXMN
VC2
VFIZW
W23
W48
WH7
WJK
WK8
WXSBR
X7M
YLTOR
Z45
Z7U
Z7V
Z7X
Z81
Z82
Z83
Z87
Z8O
Z8P
Z8U
Z8V
Z8W
Z91
Z92
ZA5
ZGI
ZMTXR
ZOVNA
~EX
1OC
AACDK
AAEOY
AAJBT
ABAKF
ABQWH
ACZOJ
ADIYS
AEFQL
AFBBN
AFFPM
AGQEE
AHBTC
AIGIU
AITYG
ALIPV
ALUQN
H13
HGLYW
MEWTI
SUPJJ
AAYZH
CGR
CUY
CVF
DCZOG
ECM
EIF
NPM
AAYXX
CITATION
7QO
7T5
7XB
8FD
8FK
FR3
H94
K9.
P64
PQEST
PQUKI
7X8
ADTPV
AOWAS
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c6463-9ee3083519618214b0fac8a991b0964de5923f1890ce24321282b77cba490abd3
IEDL.DBID AGYKE
ISSN 0364-2313
1432-2323
IngestDate Tue Nov 12 03:39:24 EST 2024
Wed Oct 30 05:07:53 EDT 2024
Fri Oct 25 01:49:07 EDT 2024
Thu Oct 10 20:46:45 EDT 2024
Thu Sep 12 18:47:03 EDT 2024
Tue Oct 15 23:48:02 EDT 2024
Sat Aug 24 00:48:45 EDT 2024
Sat Dec 16 12:01:11 EST 2023
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Breast Density
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination
Sentinel Node Biopsy
Reoperation Rate
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6463-9ee3083519618214b0fac8a991b0964de5923f1890ce24321282b77cba490abd3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-2
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
PMID 24817517
PQID 1548172091
PQPubID 47185
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs swepub_primary_oai_swepub_ki_se_521639
swepub_primary_oai_prod_swepub_kib_ki_se_129557371
proquest_miscellaneous_1548630519
proquest_journals_1548172091
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0
pubmed_primary_24817517
wiley_primary_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0_WJSBF06903
springer_journals_10_1007_s00268_014_2605_0
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate July 2014
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2014
  text: July 2014
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Boston
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Boston
– name: United States
– name: Lupsingen
PublicationSubtitle Official Journal of the International Society of Surgery/Société Internationale de Chirurgie
PublicationTitle World journal of surgery
PublicationTitleAbbrev World J Surg
PublicationTitleAlternate World J Surg
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher Springer US
Springer Nature B.V
Publisher_xml – name: Springer US
– name: Springer Nature B.V
References Van Goethem, Tjalma, Schelfout (CR4) 2006; 32
Atkins, Appleton, Fisher (CR8) 2013; 2013
Rodenko, Harms, Pruneda (CR2) 1996; 167
Saslow, Boetes, Burke (CR7) 2007; 57
Drew, Turnbull, Chatterjee (CR1) 1999; 230
Peters, van Esser, van den Bosch (CR18) 2011; 47
Bergkvist, Frisell (CR13) 2005; 92
CR15
Houssami, Turner, Morrow (CR9) 2013; 257
CR12
Bedrosian, Mick, Orel (CR16) 2003; 98
Plevritis, Kurian, Sigal (CR6) 2006; 295
Turnbull, Brown, Harvey (CR17) 2010; 375
Carney, Miglioretti, Bonnie (CR3) 2003; 138
Andersson, Frisell, Sylvan (CR14) 2013; 100
Wolfe, Albert, Belle (CR11) 1983; 21
Kuhl, Kuhn, Braun (CR19) 2007; 16
Berg, Gutierrez, NessAiver (CR5) 2004; 233
Checka, Chun, Schnabel (CR10) 2012; 198
2004; 233
2012; 198
2003; 138
2013; 2013
2006; 32
1999; 230
2006; 295
1983; 21
2013; 100
2010; 375
2013; 257
2005; 92
2011; 47
1996; 167
2007; 57
2003; 98
2007; 16
10561092 - Ann Surg. 1999 Nov;230(5):680-5
8956569 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Dec;167(6):1415-9
17959382 - Breast. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 2:S34-44
17392385 - CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89
21195605 - Eur J Cancer. 2011 Apr;47(6):879-86
15988791 - Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1221-4
23476649 - J Oncol. 2013;2013:964863
12879462 - Cancer. 2003 Aug 1;98(3):468-73
16920327 - Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006 Nov;32(9):901-10
6836099 - Radiol Clin North Am. 1983 Mar;21(1):127-36
16720823 - JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2374-84
22358028 - AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Mar;198(3):W292-5
12558355 - Ann Intern Med. 2003 Feb 4;138(3):168-75
23436699 - Br J Surg. 2013 May;100(6):775-83
20159292 - Lancet. 2010 Feb 13;375(9714):563-71
15486214 - Radiology. 2004 Dec;233(3):830-49
23187751 - Ann Surg. 2013 Feb;257(2):249-55
e_1_2_8_16_2
e_1_2_8_17_2
e_1_2_8_18_2
e_1_2_8_19_2
e_1_2_8_12_2
e_1_2_8_13_2
e_1_2_8_14_2
e_1_2_8_15_2
e_1_2_8_9_2
e_1_2_8_2_2
e_1_2_8_4_2
e_1_2_8_3_2
e_1_2_8_6_2
e_1_2_8_5_2
e_1_2_8_8_2
e_1_2_8_7_2
e_1_2_8_20_2
e_1_2_8_10_2
e_1_2_8_11_2
References_xml – volume: 257
  start-page: 249
  year: 2013
  end-page: 255
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer meta-analysis of surgical outcomes
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17
  contributor:
    fullname: Morrow
– volume: 32
  start-page: 901
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  end-page: 910
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009
  contributor:
    fullname: Schelfout
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1221
  issue: 10
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1224
  ident: CR13
  article-title: Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5052
  contributor:
    fullname: Frisell
– volume: 100
  start-page: 775
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 783
  ident: CR14
  article-title: Causes of false-negative sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9085
  contributor:
    fullname: Sylvan
– ident: CR15
– ident: CR12
– volume: 21
  start-page: 127
  year: 1983
  end-page: 136
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Brest parenchymal patterns and their relationship to risk for having or developing carcinoma
  publication-title: Radiol Clin North Am
  contributor:
    fullname: Belle
– volume: 233
  start-page: 830
  year: 2004
  end-page: 849
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
  publication-title: Radiology
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484
  contributor:
    fullname: NessAiver
– volume: 16
  start-page: S34
  year: 2007
  end-page: S44
  ident: CR19
  article-title: Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back?
  publication-title: Breast
  doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014
  contributor:
    fullname: Braun
– volume: 57
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 89
  ident: CR7
  article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
  contributor:
    fullname: Burke
– volume: 230
  start-page: 680
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  ident: CR1
  article-title: Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesion
  publication-title: Ann Surg
  doi: 10.1097/00000658-199911000-00010
  contributor:
    fullname: Chatterjee
– volume: 375
  start-page: 563
  year: 2010
  end-page: 571
  ident: CR17
  article-title: Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62070-5
  contributor:
    fullname: Harvey
– volume: 198
  start-page: 292
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 295
  ident: CR10
  article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: implication for breast cancer screening
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049
  contributor:
    fullname: Schnabel
– volume: 98
  start-page: 468
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 473
  ident: CR16
  article-title: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.11490
  contributor:
    fullname: Orel
– volume: 167
  start-page: 1415
  issue: 6
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1419
  ident: CR2
  article-title: MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569
  contributor:
    fullname: Pruneda
– volume: 138
  start-page: 168
  year: 2003
  end-page: 175
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008
  contributor:
    fullname: Bonnie
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 964863
  year: 2013
  ident: CR8
  article-title: Which imaging modality is superior for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer?
  publication-title: J Oncol
  doi: 10.1155/2013/964863
  contributor:
    fullname: Fisher
– volume: 295
  start-page: 2374
  issue: 20
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2384
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374
  contributor:
    fullname: Sigal
– volume: 47
  start-page: 879
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 886
  ident: CR18
  article-title: Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET—randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035
  contributor:
    fullname: van den Bosch
– volume: 47
  start-page: 879
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  end-page: 886
  article-title: Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONETߝrandomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Eur J Cancer
– volume: 138
  start-page: 168
  year: 2003
  end-page: 175
  article-title: Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– volume: 57
  start-page: 75
  issue: 2
  year: 2007
  end-page: 89
  article-title: American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
– volume: 98
  start-page: 468
  issue: 3
  year: 2003
  end-page: 473
  article-title: Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 2013
  start-page: 964863
  year: 2013
  article-title: Which imaging modality is superior for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer?
  publication-title: J Oncol
– volume: 100
  start-page: 775
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 783
  article-title: Causes of false‐negative sentinel node biopsy in patients with breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 92
  start-page: 1221
  issue: 10
  year: 2005
  end-page: 1224
  article-title: Multicentre validation study of sentinel node biopsy for staging in breast cancer
  publication-title: Br J Surg
– volume: 295
  start-page: 2374
  issue: 20
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2384
  article-title: Cost‐effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging
  publication-title: JAMA
– volume: 230
  start-page: 680
  issue: 5
  year: 1999
  article-title: Prospective comparison of standard triple assessment and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the breast for the evaluation of symptomatic breast lesion
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 257
  start-page: 249
  year: 2013
  end-page: 255
  article-title: Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer meta‐analysis of surgical outcomes
  publication-title: Ann Surg
– volume: 198
  start-page: 292
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  end-page: 295
  article-title: The relationship of mammographic density and age: implication for breast cancer screening
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 167
  start-page: 1415
  issue: 6
  year: 1996
  end-page: 1419
  article-title: MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology
  publication-title: Am J Roentgenol
– volume: 233
  start-page: 830
  year: 2004
  end-page: 849
  article-title: Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer
  publication-title: Radiology
– volume: 16
  start-page: S34
  year: 2007
  end-page: S44
  article-title: Pre‐operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back?
  publication-title: Breast
– volume: 32
  start-page: 901
  issue: 9
  year: 2006
  end-page: 910
  article-title: Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer
  publication-title: Eur J Surg Oncol
– volume: 375
  start-page: 563
  year: 2010
  end-page: 571
  article-title: Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial
  publication-title: Lancet
– volume: 21
  start-page: 127
  year: 1983
  end-page: 136
  article-title: Brest parenchymal patterns and their relationship to risk for having or developing carcinoma
  publication-title: Radiol Clin North Am
– ident: e_1_2_8_10_2
  doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827a8d17
– ident: e_1_2_8_4_2
  doi: 10.7326/0003‐4819‐138‐3‐200302040‐00008
– ident: e_1_2_8_3_2
  doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956569
– ident: e_1_2_8_9_2
  doi: 10.1155/2013/964863
– ident: e_1_2_8_18_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0140‐6736(09)62070‐5
– ident: e_1_2_8_15_2
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.9085
– ident: e_1_2_8_16_2
– ident: e_1_2_8_7_2
  doi: 10.1001/jama.295.20.2374
– ident: e_1_2_8_19_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.11.035
– ident: e_1_2_8_5_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.06.009
– ident: e_1_2_8_8_2
  doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.2.75
– ident: e_1_2_8_17_2
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.11490
– ident: e_1_2_8_6_2
  doi: 10.1148/radiol.2333031484
– ident: e_1_2_8_2_2
  doi: 10.1097/00000658‐199911000‐00010
– ident: e_1_2_8_20_2
  doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2007.07.014
– ident: e_1_2_8_13_2
– ident: e_1_2_8_11_2
  doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.6049
– ident: e_1_2_8_12_2
  doi: 10.1016/S0033-8389(22)02368-5
– ident: e_1_2_8_14_2
  doi: 10.1002/bjs.5052
SSID ssj0017606
Score 2.4580727
Snippet Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast...
Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast cancer. Low...
Abstract Background Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral...
BACKGROUNDBreast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown high sensitivity in determining tumor extent, multifocality, and occult contralateral breast...
SourceID swepub
proquest
crossref
pubmed
wiley
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Publisher
StartPage 1685
SubjectTerms Abdominal Surgery
Adult
Axilla
Breast Density
Breast Neoplasms - drug therapy
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Cardiac Surgery
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Female
General Surgery
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Examination
Mastectomy, Segmental
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Neoplasm Staging
Patient Care Planning
Preoperative Care
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Reoperation Rate
Sentinel Node Biopsy
Surgery
Thoracic Surgery
Vascular Surgery
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1LT9wwELYKvfSCqPpKS5GRKtQHUZ34lXCpWNQVINGuKKh7sxzHkVZVk2V3ObS3_vPOJHEA9cEhl2TixJ5x5nPm8wwhrzJWghkoEesCLFiAQ45z7fJYCmu19Va6LtvnJ3V0IU6mctr_cFv2tMrwTWw_1GXj8B_5e4TW4GzBvX2YX8ZYNQqjq30JjTVyP0mZQkqXng4LrkQr1scqRQw4hoeoJmuTiKYKaVxwRSF_7bZf-gNs3giUDklFb-PZ1iGNN8lGjyTpQaf6h-Serx-RX5OFb-a-S-dNT8-OaVNRwHh0hOTzFX09-Xw6ekOPQ2mSJZ106SboeWCc01kdpA_RJBb79ACkmrAnc4-e2bpsvs9--nKPtht4keHpFxQ5iT8ek4vxx_PDo7ivshA7JRSPc-854rAEa7-kiShYZV1mATcWsLwRpZeAAasky5nzqeDg6rK00NoVVuTMFiV_QtbrpvbPCK0yDy7f2cpyDBOzwmuAE56VgPGkUzIib8MYm3nXOzOkTW4VYkAhBhViWES2ghZMP6-W5toKIrIzXIYZgWEOW_vmqpNRHKFpRJ522hueluLtMtEReRfUeaPxf79K2ml8aAeTcqOHM_35bzM8zNIb6LCUmmt4wd2_3DTIoyxAJwCI0HprRncPifl68mU0xtzS_Pn_R-cFeZCibbe84i2yvlpc-ZeAnlbFdjtFfgP3mhHh
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Preoperative MRI of the Breast (POMB) Influences Primary Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00268-014-2605-0
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2605-0
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24817517
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1548172091
https://search.proquest.com/docview/1548630519
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:129557371
Volume 38
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9wwEBZpAqWXNH0lbtOgQil9xIttSZad227YbZKy6bLN0u1JSLYMyxI77OPQ3PrPO-MXCUkpORiDPJL1GFmfPDOfCHkfeSmoQchdaUCDOSzIbiyT2BVca6mtFknF9nkenkz42VRMN0jQ_rrI553GIll-qNtYN9wtoN8VdxGCu7BN36rjTre6X39967e2Axl6tYUSRJnPGlvmfYXcXo3uQMwb5tGWSvQ2ii2XocHTKjRwWbIXovfJvLNemU5yfZfb8QEt3CHbNSql3UqNnpENmz8nj4e13f0F-TNa2OLKVizhdDg-pUVGATrSHvq0r-jH0fdh7xM9bU48WdJRxWJBLxpHdjrLG-lj1LTFEe2CVNGEeh7Ssc7T4nJ2bdNDWsYFo-OoXVB0dfz9kkwG_YvjE7c-vMFNQh4yN7aWIbzz8UiZwOfGy3QSaYCjBnZNPLUCoGXmR7GX2IAzGMkoMFImRvPY0yZlr8hmXuR2j9AssoAkEp1phtZnz1gJKMV6KUBHkYTCIZ-bQVRXVetUy8ZcdqqCTlXYqcpzyH4zzKqerkuF-zZAcoCdHPKufQwTDa0nOrfFupIJGSJeh-xW6tG-LcDswpcO-dIM7Y3C_12VoFKpthzk-saFU9Xp8xleamkVNFgIySRU8MM9mVp5lIVpAbgTSi_19P9don6e_egNkLKavX5QA96QJwGqa-m9vE82V4u1fQsYbWUOyCM5lQf11IR7r38-GkPqJOj-BedjMNE
link.rule.ids 230,315,783,787,888,12068,21400,27936,27937,31731,31732,33756,33757,41093,41535,42162,42604,43322,43817,52123,52246,74073,74630
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELagHOBSgXilFDASQjwa4cSOnXBB3YrVbumWVdmKvVmO40grRLLsbg9w6z_vTBKHVrwOuSQTJ_aMM58z428IeZ6yAsxAilDlYMECHHKYKZuFiTBGGWcS27J9HsvRqTicJ_Puh9u6S6v038TmQ13UFv-Rv0VoDc4W3Nv75fcQq0ZhdLUroXGd3EAeLqxgoOb9gitSknWxShECjuE-qskaEtFYYhoXXJGYv3bVL_0GNi8FSntS0at4tnFIw9tku0OSdL9V_R1yzVV3yfl05eqla-m86eRkTOuSAsajA0w-39CX00-TwSs69qVJ1nTa0k3Qmc84p4vKSx-gSaze0X2Qqv2ezD16Yqqi_rb46Yo92mzgxQxPt6KYk_jjHjkdfpgdjMKuykJopZA8zJzjiMMirP0SRyJnpbGpAdyYw_JGFC4BDFhGacasiwUHV5fGuVI2NyJjJi_4fbJV1ZV7SGiZOnD51pSGY5iY5U4BnHCsAIyXWJkE5LUfY71se6d72uRGIRoUolEhmgVk12tBd_NqrX9ZQUCe9ZdhRmCYw1SuPmtlJEdoGpAHrfb6p8V4exKpgLzx6rzU-N9fJW413reDpNzo4XR3_usCD712GjqcJIoreMEXf7ipl0dZgE4AEKH1xoz-PyT6y-HnwRC5pfnOv0fnKbk5mk2O9NH4-OMjcitGO29yjHfJ1mZ15h4DktrkT5rpcgHmihTI
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1Lb9QwELZgKyEuCMQrtICREOLRqN7EjhMuqFu66ha6REur9mY5jiOtKpJld3uAG_-cmcQOrXgdcknGTuwZe75kvswQ8jxlJZhBwkNZgAVzcMhhJk0WCq611FYL02X7nCYHJ_zwTJw5_tPK0Sr9nthu1GVj8Bv5DkJrcLbg3nYqR4vI34_fLb6GWEEKI62unMZ1siF5ErMB2RjtT_NZH1OQCXORSx4Cqol9jJO1KUWjBEldcCVBNttVL_Ub9LwUNu1TjF5Ft617Gt8mtxyupLudIdwh12x9l_zIl7ZZ2C65Nz2aTWhTUUB8dIRU9DV9mX86Gr2iE1-oZEXzLvkEPfb8czqvvfQeGsjyLd0Fqcb_oblNZ7oumy_z77bcpu3vvMj3tEuKDMVv98jJeP947yB0NRdCk8CshZm1MaKyIVaCiYa8YJU2qQYUWcDLDi-tAERYDdOMGRvxGBxfGhVSmkLzjOmijO-TQd3U9iGhVWoBABhd6RiDxqywEsCFZSUgPmESEZDXfo7Vohud6pMotwpRoBCFClEsIFteC8qtspX6ZRMBedZfhvWBQQ9d2-aikwFrgAEF5EGnvf5uETYXQxmQN16dlzr_-6NEncb7fjBFN_o75c6fz_FQK6tgwELIWMIDvvhDo14eZQFIAVyE3lsz-v-UqNPDz6MxZpqOH_17dp6SG7BW1MfJ9MMmuRmhmbeE4y0yWC8v7GOAVeviiVsvPwESuRpl
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative+MRI+of+the+breast+%28POMB%29+influences+primary+treatment+in+breast+cancer%3A+a+prospective%2C+randomized%2C+multicenter+study&rft.jtitle=World+journal+of+surgery&rft.au=Gonzalez%2C+Virginia&rft.au=Sandelin%2C+Kerstin&rft.au=Karlsson%2C+Anders&rft.au=%C3%85berg%2C+Wiveca&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.eissn=1432-2323&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1685&rft.epage=1693&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs00268-014-2605-0&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0364-2313&client=summon