Motions Add, Orientations Don’t, in the Human Visual System

Humans can distinguish between contours of similar orientation, and between directions of visual motion. There is consensus that both of these capabilities depend on selective activation of tuned neural channels. The bandwidths of these tuned channels are estimated here by modelling previously publi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 8; no. 10; p. e75947
Main Author Freeman, Alan W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 04.10.2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0075947

Cover

More Information
Summary:Humans can distinguish between contours of similar orientation, and between directions of visual motion. There is consensus that both of these capabilities depend on selective activation of tuned neural channels. The bandwidths of these tuned channels are estimated here by modelling previously published empirical data. Human subjects were presented with a rapid stream of randomly oriented gratings, or randomly directed motions, and asked to respond when they saw a target stimulus. For the orientation task, subjects were less likely to respond when two preceding orientations were close to the target orientation but differed from each other, presumably due to a failure of summation. For the motion data, by contrast, subjects were more likely to respond when the vector sum of two previous directions was in the target direction. Fitting a cortical signal-processing model to these data showed that the direction bandwidth of motion sensors is about three times the bandwidth of orientation sensors, and that it is the large bandwidth that allows the summation of motion stimuli. The differing bandwidths of orientation and motion sensors presumably equip them for differing tasks, such as orientation discrimination and estimation of heading, respectively.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: AF. Performed the experiments: AF. Analyzed the data: AF. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AF. Wrote the paper: AF.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0075947