Reovirus uses temporospatial compartmentalization to orchestrate core versus outercapsid assembly

• Published in: PLoS pathogens Vol. 18; no. 9; p. e1010641
• Main Authors: Kniert, Justine, dos Santos, Theodore, Eaton, Heather E, Jung Cho, Woo, Plummer, Greg, Shmulevitz, Maya
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 13.09.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Amplification; Assembly; Biology and Life Sciences; Capsids; Core particles; Cores; Cycloheximide; Development and progression; Double-stranded RNA; Electron microscopy; Factories; Fluorescence; Gene expression; Genetic aspects; Genomes; Infections; Lipids; Localization; Mammals; Medicine and Health Sciences; Microscopy; Nuclei (cytology); Pathogens; Prevention; Progeny; Proteins; Reoviruses; Replication; Research and Analysis Methods; Ribonucleic acid; RNA; RNA viruses; Rotavirus; siRNA; Virions; Viruses; Canada
• ISSN: 1553-7374; 1553-7366; 1553-7374
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010641

Reoviridae virus family members, such as mammalian orthoreovirus (reovirus), encounter a unique challenge during replication. To hide the dsRNA from host recognition, the genome remains encapsidated in transcriptionally active proteinaceous core capsids that transcribe and release +RNA. De novo +RNAs and core proteins must repeatedly assemble into new progeny cores in order to logarithmically amplify replication. Reoviruses also produce outercapsid (OC) proteins μ1, σ3 and σ1 that assemble onto cores to create highly stable infectious full virions. Current models of reovirus replication position amplification of transcriptionally-active cores and assembly of infectious virions in shared factories, but we hypothesized that since assembly of OC proteins would halt core amplification, OC assembly is somehow regulated. Kinetic analysis of virus +RNA production, core versus OC protein expression, and core particles versus whole virus particle accumulation, indicated that assembly of OC proteins onto core particles was temporally delayed. All viral RNAs and proteins were made simultaneously, eliminating the possibility that delayed OC RNAs or proteins account for delayed OC assembly. High resolution fluorescence and electron microscopy revealed that core amplification occurred early during infection at peripheral core-only factories, while all OC proteins associated with lipid droplets (LDs) that coalesced near the nucleus in a μ1–dependent manner. Core-only factories transitioned towards the nucleus despite cycloheximide-mediated halting of new protein expression, while new core-only factories developed in the periphery. As infection progressed, OC assembly occurred at LD-and nuclear-proximal factories. Silencing of OC μ1 expression with siRNAs led to large factories that remained further from the nucleus, implicating μ1 in the transition to perinuclear factories. Moreover, late during infection, +RNA pools largely contributed to the production of de-novo viral proteins and fully-assembled infectious viruses. Altogether the results suggest an advanced model of reovirus replication with spatiotemporal segregation of core amplification, OC complexes and fully assembled virions.