Synthetic biology devices for in vitro and in vivo diagnostics

There is a growing need to enhance our capabilities in medical and environmental diagnostics. Synthetic biologists have begun to focus their biomolecular engineering approaches toward this goal, offering promising results that could lead to the development of new classes of inexpensive, rapidly depl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 112; no. 47; pp. 14429 - 14435
Main Authors Slomovic, Shimyn, Keith Pardee, James J. Collins
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 24.11.2015
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:There is a growing need to enhance our capabilities in medical and environmental diagnostics. Synthetic biologists have begun to focus their biomolecular engineering approaches toward this goal, offering promising results that could lead to the development of new classes of inexpensive, rapidly deployable diagnostics. Many conventional diagnostics rely on antibody-based platforms that, although exquisitely sensitive, are slow and costly to generate and cannot readily confront rapidly emerging pathogens or be applied to orphan diseases. Synthetic biology, with its rational and short design-to-production cycles, has the potential to overcome many of these limitations. Synthetic biology devices, such as engineered gene circuits, bring new capabilities to molecular diagnostics, expanding the molecular detection palette, creating dynamic sensors, and untethering reactions from laboratory equipment. The field is also beginning to move toward in vivo diagnostics, which could provide near real-time surveillance of multiple pathological conditions. Here, we describe current efforts in synthetic biology, focusing on the translation of promising technologies into pragmatic diagnostic tools and platforms.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508521112
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-2
ObjectType-Feature-2
1S.S. and K.P. contributed equally to this work.
Edited by Robert Langer, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, and approved June 16, 2015 (received for review May 6, 2015)
Author contributions: S.S., K.P., and J.J.C. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.1508521112