Women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making: a systematic review

Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC women's health Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 643 - 10
Main Authors Idris, Idayu Badilla, Hamis, Amy Azira, Bukhori, Ayuzeity Bistari Md, Hoong, David Chan Chee, Yusop, Hakimah, Shaharuddin, Muhammad Al-Amin, Fauzi, Nazmeen Adline Fawwazah A., Kandayah, Thinakaran
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 02.12.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making. Systematic review. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022. The inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded. We carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles. A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion. Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
AbstractList Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making.OBJECTIVESAlthough there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making.Systematic review.DESIGNSystematic review.PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022.DATA SOURCESPubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022.The inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded.ELIGIBILITY CRITERIAThe inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded.We carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESISWe carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles.A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion.RESULTSA total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion.Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.CONCLUSIONSIdentification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
Abstract Objectives Although there are calls for women’s empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017–2022. Eligibility criteria The inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis We carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles. Results A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women’s education and occupation, husbands’/partners’ education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion. Conclusions Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022. A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion. Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
Objectives Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making. Design Systematic review. Data sources PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022. Eligibility criteria The inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded. Data extraction and synthesis We carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles. Results A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion. Conclusions Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services. Keywords: Women, Autonomy, Healthcare, Decision making, Systematic review
ObjectivesAlthough there are calls for women’s empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017–2022.Eligibility criteriaThe inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded.Data extraction and synthesisWe carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles.ResultsA total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women’s education and occupation, husbands’/partners’ education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion.ConclusionsIdentification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. The autonomy of women is believed to be crucial in improving their health-related outcomes. This review discusses factors that influence autonomy among women in healthcare decision making. Systematic review. PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus were searched from 2017-2022. The inclusion criteria include original articles, case studies and reports that has been written in the English Language, while manuscripts with no full article, reviews, newspaper reports, grey literatures, and articles that did not answer the review objectives were excluded. We carried out data extraction using a standardized data extraction form, that has been organized using Microsoft Excel. A narrative synthesis was carried out to combine the findings of all included articles. A total of 70 records were identified and 18 were reviewed, yielding eight articles to be included in the accepted list of studies. All studies were conducted in developing countries and most of the studies were cross sectional. Factors that were associated with women's autonomy in healthcare decision making were age, women's education and occupation, husbands'/partners' education and occupation, residential location or region of residence, household wealth index as well as culture and religion. Identification of these factors may help stakeholders in improving women's autonomy in healthcare decision making. Policymakers play a crucial role in healthcare decision making by enacting laws and policies that protect women's rights, promoting gender-sensitive healthcare services, ensuring access to comprehensive information, promoting health education, and supporting vulnerable populations. These efforts ensure women's autonomy including able to access to unbiased and effective healthcare services.
ArticleNumber 643
Audience Academic
Author Hamis, Amy Azira
Shaharuddin, Muhammad Al-Amin
Kandayah, Thinakaran
Idris, Idayu Badilla
Bukhori, Ayuzeity Bistari Md
Yusop, Hakimah
Fauzi, Nazmeen Adline Fawwazah A.
Hoong, David Chan Chee
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Idayu Badilla
  surname: Idris
  fullname: Idris, Idayu Badilla
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Amy Azira
  surname: Hamis
  fullname: Hamis, Amy Azira
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ayuzeity Bistari Md
  surname: Bukhori
  fullname: Bukhori, Ayuzeity Bistari Md
– sequence: 4
  givenname: David Chan Chee
  surname: Hoong
  fullname: Hoong, David Chan Chee
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hakimah
  surname: Yusop
  fullname: Yusop, Hakimah
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Muhammad Al-Amin
  surname: Shaharuddin
  fullname: Shaharuddin, Muhammad Al-Amin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Nazmeen Adline Fawwazah A.
  surname: Fauzi
  fullname: Fauzi, Nazmeen Adline Fawwazah A.
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Thinakaran
  surname: Kandayah
  fullname: Kandayah, Thinakaran
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks9u1DAQxiNURNuFF-CAInHhkuJ_iW0uqKoKVKrEBcTRmjiTXS-JXeykaG-8Bq_Hk-DtltKtELIsW_Y3P3tmvuPiwAePRfGckhNKVfM6UaZJXRHG85SaVeJRcUSFZFWjpDi4tz8sjlNaE0KlquWT4pArIpji8qg4_xJG9L9-_EwlzFPwYdyUzpcrhGFaWYhYdmhdcsGXI3x1fvmmhDJt0oQjTM6WEa8dfn9aPO5hSPjsdl0Un9-dfzr7UF1-fH9xdnpZ2YaTqbLS8ratWcs67JAhSK0stkq0NapeUAC0PVqCPdQtl5QLyjslQKMioKHhi-Jix-0CrM1VdCPEjQngzM1BiEsDMX9rQJNTR9ZQXndUCdlpYBS1tj2nnNm637Le7lhXcztiZ9FPEYY96P6NdyuzDNeGkkZzKngmvLolxPBtxjSZ0SWLwwAew5wMU7pRpNa50ovi5QPpOszR51qZ3ENGGcn9-6taQs7A-T7kh-0Wak6lrFnuZCOy6uQfqjw6HJ3NFuldPt8LeHE_07sU_7ggC9hOYGNIKWJ_J6HEbK1mdlYz2WrmxmpmS1UPgqybsifCtlpu-F_ob4511-M
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph22010053
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41371_024_00945_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_soc14040046
crossref_primary_10_32948_ajpt_2024_03_20
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0309300
crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines12081645
crossref_primary_10_20473_jaki_v12i1_2024_120_128
crossref_primary_10_1136_bmjopen_2023_080416
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12978_024_01918_7
crossref_primary_10_1038_s44222_024_00239_5
crossref_primary_10_3390_medicina60101624
crossref_primary_10_2174_0118749445346686241030050617
crossref_primary_10_2185_jrm_2024_017
crossref_primary_10_5662_wjm_v15_i3_102477
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40609_024_00371_5
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12879_024_09535_2
crossref_primary_10_3138_jcfs_54_4_02
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsoc_2024_1466161
crossref_primary_10_3390_healthcare12242494
crossref_primary_10_3390_vaccines12060625
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0316948
crossref_primary_10_25259_IJMR_524_2024
crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_66825
crossref_primary_10_1080_16549716_2024_2392354
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_94057_3
crossref_primary_10_3389_fgwh_2024_1360052
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_glmedi_2024_100156
crossref_primary_10_1002_eahr_60005
crossref_primary_10_1177_10775587251316917
Cites_doi 10.2147/IJWH.S105483
10.1051/e3sconf/20187410013
10.5812/ircmj.13629
10.1080/07360932.2019.1627671
10.1186/s12889-020-09003-x
10.1186/s12905-021-01517-9
10.1111/jep.12884
10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8
10.2188/jea.JE20190005
10.1017/S0021932017000037
10.1017/s0021932010000222
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045952
10.1080/03630242.2017.1353574
10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p312
10.1111/jssr.12210
10.1186/s12905-018-0540-1
10.1136/bmj.n71
10.1177/20503121211068719
10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
10.1038/s41431-019-0353-1
10.1002/ijop.12292
10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1431
10.23937/2474-1353/1510054
10.11564/29-2-743
10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00318.x
10.1186/1742-4755-7-15
10.1177/1049732307301236
10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816
10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059307
10.2147/IJWH.S131139
10.1371/journal.pone.0209985
10.1363/3113105
10.3233/EFI-180221
10.1007/s13524-017-0590-2
10.1186/s12884-014-0398-7
10.1089/jwh.2016.5753
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2023. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7R6
7RV
7X7
7XB
888
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
KB0
M0S
M1P
NAPCQ
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PMKZF
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGEN
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
QXPDG
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12905-023-02792-4
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
GenderWatch
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials - QC
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Digital Collections
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Women's Studies
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
Diversity Collection
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Diversity Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
GenderWatch (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Digital Collections
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
GenderWatch
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Women's & Gender Studies
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE - Academic



Publicly Available Content Database
MEDLINE
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
Education
EISSN 1472-6874
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_472e26135d1847d9a21e99cf3132c5f6
PMC10693143
A775287464
38042837
10_1186_s12905_023_02792_4
Genre Systematic Review
Journal Article
GeographicLocations Malaysia
Iran
Senegal
Ethiopia
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Malaysia
– name: Iran
– name: Ethiopia
– name: Senegal
GroupedDBID ---
04C
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7R6
7RV
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACHQT
ACIHN
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADOJX
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BKEYQ
BMC
BMSDO
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECF
ECT
EIHBH
ESX
EX3
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
ICW
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PMKZF
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
QXPDG
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
~8M
-5E
-5G
-A0
-BR
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGEN
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-c7c3bb52b2dede2ea798ceb84b5e8f41aaecfec0efa5b3713413d84a9e80a9a63
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1472-6874
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:06:52 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:35:46 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 19:30:01 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 22:28:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:25:07 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:14:07 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:31:05 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:26:28 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:07:19 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Women
Healthcare
Systematic review
Autonomy
Decision making
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c630t-c7c3bb52b2dede2ea798ceb84b5e8f41aaecfec0efa5b3713413d84a9e80a9a63
Notes ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902120792?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 38042837
PQID 2902120792
PQPubID 42554
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_472e26135d1847d9a21e99cf3132c5f6
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10693143
proquest_miscellaneous_2896805928
proquest_journals_2902120792
gale_infotracmisc_A775287464
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A775287464
pubmed_primary_38042837
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12905_023_02792_4
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12905_023_02792_4
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-12-02
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-12-02
PublicationDate_xml – month: 12
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-12-02
  day: 02
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC women's health
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Womens Health
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 2792_CR20
2792_CR42
2792_CR21
2792_CR43
2792_CR40
2792_CR41
HP Crissman (2792_CR32) 2012; 43
2792_CR28
2792_CR29
2792_CR26
2792_CR27
2792_CR24
2792_CR25
2792_CR22
2792_CR44
2792_CR23
2792_CR45
2792_CR2
2792_CR31
2792_CR3
2792_CR1
2792_CR30
2792_CR6
2792_CR7
2792_CR4
2792_CR5
2792_CR8
2792_CR9
2792_CR19
A Kassahun (2792_CR10) 2022; 12
2792_CR17
2792_CR39
2792_CR18
2792_CR15
2792_CR37
2792_CR16
2792_CR38
2792_CR13
2792_CR35
2792_CR14
2792_CR36
2792_CR11
2792_CR33
2792_CR12
2792_CR34
References_xml – ident: 2792_CR19
  doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S105483
– ident: 2792_CR28
  doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/20187410013
– ident: 2792_CR42
  doi: 10.5812/ircmj.13629
– ident: 2792_CR39
  doi: 10.1080/07360932.2019.1627671
– ident: 2792_CR18
  doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09003-x
– ident: 2792_CR27
– ident: 2792_CR40
– ident: 2792_CR2
  doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01517-9
– ident: 2792_CR14
  doi: 10.1111/jep.12884
– ident: 2792_CR23
– ident: 2792_CR43
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61228-8
– ident: 2792_CR25
  doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20190005
– ident: 2792_CR5
  doi: 10.1017/S0021932017000037
– ident: 2792_CR7
  doi: 10.1017/s0021932010000222
– ident: 2792_CR8
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045952
– ident: 2792_CR26
  doi: 10.1080/03630242.2017.1353574
– ident: 2792_CR35
– ident: 2792_CR45
  doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p312
– ident: 2792_CR34
  doi: 10.1111/jssr.12210
– ident: 2792_CR3
  doi: 10.1186/s12905-018-0540-1
– ident: 2792_CR12
  doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71
– ident: 2792_CR15
  doi: 10.1177/20503121211068719
– ident: 2792_CR11
  doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0468-4
– ident: 2792_CR9
  doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0353-1
– ident: 2792_CR21
  doi: 10.1002/ijop.12292
– ident: 2792_CR31
  doi: 10.4102/phcfm.v10i1.1431
– ident: 2792_CR1
  doi: 10.23937/2474-1353/1510054
– ident: 2792_CR20
– ident: 2792_CR33
  doi: 10.11564/29-2-743
– volume: 43
  start-page: 201
  issue: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 2792_CR32
  publication-title: Stud Fam Plann
  doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00318.x
– ident: 2792_CR22
  doi: 10.1186/1742-4755-7-15
– ident: 2792_CR24
– ident: 2792_CR30
  doi: 10.1177/1049732307301236
– ident: 2792_CR17
  doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102816
– volume: 12
  start-page: e059307
  issue: 5
  year: 2022
  ident: 2792_CR10
  publication-title: BMJ Open
  doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059307
– ident: 2792_CR6
– ident: 2792_CR16
  doi: 10.1177/20503121211068719
– ident: 2792_CR4
  doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S131139
– ident: 2792_CR36
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209985
– ident: 2792_CR38
– ident: 2792_CR44
  doi: 10.1363/3113105
– ident: 2792_CR13
  doi: 10.3233/EFI-180221
– ident: 2792_CR29
  doi: 10.1007/s13524-017-0590-2
– ident: 2792_CR37
  doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0398-7
– ident: 2792_CR41
  doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5753
SSID ssj0017857
Score 2.504491
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in healthcare...
Objectives Although there are calls for women's empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women's autonomy in...
ObjectivesAlthough there are calls for women’s empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women’s autonomy in...
Abstract Objectives Although there are calls for women’s empowerment and gender equity globally, there are still large disparities regarding women’s autonomy...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 643
SubjectTerms Age
At risk populations
Autonomy
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Developing countries
Education
Empowerment
Female
Gender Identity
Health care
Health promotion
Healthcare
Higher education
Humans
Husbands
LDCs
Low income groups
Personal Autonomy
Socioeconomic Factors
Systematic review
Women
Women's Rights
Womens health
Womens rights
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1La9wwEBYlp0AIfaSp07SoEOihmNiSrEdvSUkIhebUQG5CL5NA65Tu7j1_o3-vv6QzktddE0gvvVoyHo1mPDPSzDeEHAWluI69rD2miosgfW28cLVMupEmxEYkLHD-cikvrsTn6-56o9UX5oQVeODCuGOhWAIvn3cRYhEVjWNtMib0CDkYuj6DbYPNWwdT4_2B0p1al8hoebzA0xasRM53lgaImpmhjNb_8J-8YZTmCZMbFuj8KdkdXUd6Ukh-Rp6k4TnZKedutJQTvSBnuSXl7_tfC-pWy1yxQG8HejOledE4dtWh33Mjqo_U0b9wzrSUsuyRq_Ozr58u6rFVQh0kb5Z1UIF73zHPYoqJJaeMDslr4buke9E6l0KfQpN613mO9aMtj1o4A1vijJP8Jdka7ob0ilDWx7ZpIgeb5oTqwX8MUbYOrBZzPrSmIu2aczaMOOLYzuKbzfGElrZw2wK3bea2FRX5ML3zo6BoPDr7FDdkmokI2PkByIUd5cL-Sy4q8h6306KeAnnBjeUGsEhEvLInSnWI9S_hc4ezmaBfYT68Fgg76vfCAsnAnwbIrci7aRjfxJy1Id2tYI42UoP3ynRF9ov8TEviGmNVriqiZ5I1W_N8ZLi9yejfEMMbDl7uwf_g0muyzVArMD-HHZKt5c9VegNe1tK_zQr1B3W1Ivk
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwEB5BuSAhBOWVUpCRkDigqInt-MEFFdSqQoITlfZm-RVaCbKlu3vnb_Tv8UvwON60EVKvsaPY4xl7xpn5PoC3XkqmQi9qh6ni3AtXa8dtLaJqhPah4RELnL9-Eyen_MuiW5QLt1VJq9zuiXmjDkuPd-QHVCMYeSM1_Xjxu0bWKPy7Wig07sI9hC7DlC65mAIuJJ6X20IZJQ5WeOeC9cj5z6VOQ5sdRhmz__-d-cbRNE-bvHEOHT-Ch8WBJIfjij-GO3HYRe7lkqexCw_GmzgyFhg9gaNMUvn3z9WK2M061zCQ84GcTYlfJBSeHfIrU1N9IJZcAzyTsbjlKZweH33_fFIX8oTaC9asay89c66jjoYYIo1WauWjU9x1UfW8tTb6Pvom9rZzDCtKWxYUtzotktVWsGewMyyH-AII7UPbNIEl-Vsu--RR-iBam84xap1vdQXtVorGF2RxJLj4aXKEoYQZJW-S5E2WvOEVvJ_euRhxNW7t_QkXZ-qJmNj5wfLyhykmZrikMcWDrAspapVBW9pGrX2P4JS-60UF73BpDVpuGp63pQAhTRIxsMyhlB2i_4v0uf1Zz2Rxft68VQ5TLH5lrvWzgjdTM76JWWxDXG5SH6WFSv4sVRU8H3VpmhJTGL0yWYGaadlszvOW4fws44GnqF6z5Pfu3T6ul3Cfou5jLg7dh5315Sa-Sh7V2r3OZvMPvd8fHg
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Women’s autonomy in healthcare decision making: a systematic review
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38042837
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902120792
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2896805928
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10693143
https://doaj.org/article/472e26135d1847d9a21e99cf3132c5f6
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV3ra9RAEB_6-CKI-DZajxWEfpBokt3sQxDplZYitEjx4PDLsq_YQs3pPUD_e2c3uWuDRfySD9lNdnd2JjOzmfkNwGsnBJW-4bmNoeLMcZsry0zOgyy4cr5gISY4n57xkwn7NK2nW7Aud9QTcHGraxfrSU3mV29__fz9EQX-QxJ4yd8t4llKzDNOfyQVDrkNu6iZRBTUU3b9V0HIhPxZMlHlXAq2TqK59R0DRZXw_P_-at9QW8OQyhs66vg-3OuNS3LQccMD2ArtQ7jbncyRLuHoERymopX7C2JWy5TRQC5bcrEJAyO-r7pDvqdCVe-JIddwz6RLdXkMk-OjL4cneV9KIXecFsvcCUetrStb-eBDFYxQ0gUrma2DbFhpTHBNcEVoTG1pzC8tqZfMKNwyowynT2CnnbXhGZCq8WVReIo6zzDRoH3pPC8NarXKWFeqDMo13bTrccZjuYsrnfwNyXVHa4201onWmmXwZvPMjw5l45-9x3E7Nj0jQna6MZt_073AadzjgN4hrT36sMIrU5VBKddEqEpXNzyD_biZOnIWTs-ZPh0BFxkRsfSBEHWsBcBxuL1BT5Q_N2xes4Nes6_GKSN9CpxuBq82zfHJGNPWhtkK-0jFJVq3lczgacc9myVRGX1ZKjKQA74arHnY0l5eJHRw9PEVRSv4-X8M_ALuVJHlY3hOtQc7y_kqvEQja2lHsC2mYgS746Ozz-ejdFQxStKE1_Px1z986yVK
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1baxUxEA719EFBROtttWoExQdZuptkcxFEWj2lte1BpIW-pbmtLeie2nMO4pt_wz_hj_KXmNlbuwh96-smu5tMZjIzycx8CL1wQlDpS55aCBVnjttUWWZSHmTGlfMZC5DgvDfhWwfs42FxuIT-dLkwEFbZ7Yn1Ru2nDs7I14iCYuSZUOTd6fcUUKPgdrWD0GjYYif8_BFdttnb7Q9xfV8Ssjnef7-VtqgCqeM0m6dOOGptQSzxwQcSjFDSBSuZLYIsWW5McGVwWShNYSmkWubUS2ZUHL1RhtP43WtomdHoyozQ8sZ48ulzf28hZCG61BzJ12ZwygMZ0PVdqYrEGKi_GiXgf11wQRkOAzUvaL7N2-hWa7Li9YbH7qClUK0A2nMbGbKCbjZnf7hJabqLxjUs5t9fv2fYLOZ11gQ-qfBxH2qGfYvsg7_VYFhvsMHnJaVxk05zDx1cCWHvo1E1rcJDhEnp8yzzNK64YaKMNqzzPDdRcxJjXa4SlHdU1K6tZQ6QGl917dNIrhvK60h5XVNeswS97t85bSp5XNp7Axan7wlVuOsH07MvuhVqzQQJ0QOlhY9-svDKkDwo5Uooh-mKkifoFSythr0iDs-ZNuUhThKqbul1IQrAG-Dxd6uDnlHG3bC5Yw7d7jEzfS4RCXreN8ObEDdXheki9pGKy2hBE5mgBw0v9VOiEvxlKhIkB1w2mPOwpTo5riuQ51GOabS0H10-rmfo-tb-3q7e3Z7sPEY3CMgBRAKRVTSany3Ck2jPze3TVogwOrpquf0HNTBgcQ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Women%27s+autonomy+in+healthcare+decision+making%3A+a+systematic+review&rft.jtitle=BMC+women%27s+health&rft.au=Idris%2C+Idayu+Badilla&rft.au=Hamis%2C+Amy+Azira&rft.au=Bukhori%2C+Ayuzeity+Bistari+Md&rft.au=Hoong%2C+David+Chan+Chee&rft.date=2023-12-02&rft.issn=1472-6874&rft.eissn=1472-6874&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12905-023-02792-4&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6874&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6874&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6874&client=summon