False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis
COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivi...
Saved in:
Published in | Virology journal Vol. 18; no. 1; p. 13 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
09.01.2021
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes.
SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results.
During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively.
Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Background COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. Methods SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. Results During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively. Conclusions Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Discordant testing, False negative rate COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively. Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes.BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes.SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results.METHODSSARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results.During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively.RESULTSDuring the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively.Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19.CONCLUSIONSStudies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. RESULTS: During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5–17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6–98.9%) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5-17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6-98.9%) respectively. Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. Abstract Background COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR assays is not entirely known due to the lack of a gold standard. We sought to evaluate the false negative rate (FNR) and sensitivity of our laboratory-developed SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR targeting the envelope (E) and RNA-dependent RNA-polymerase (RdRp) genes. Methods SARS-CoV-2 rtRT-PCR results at the Public Health Laboratory (Alberta, Canada) from January 21 to April 18, 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with an initial negative rtRT-PCR followed by a positive result on repeat testing within 14 days (defined as discordant results). Negative samples from these discordant specimens were re-tested using three alternate rtRT-PCR assays (targeting the E gene and N1/N2 regions of the nucleocapsid genes) to assess for false negative (FN) results. Results During the time period specified, 95,919 patients (100,001 samples) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 49 patients were found to have discordant results including 49 positive and 52 negative swabs. Repeat testing of 52 negative swabs found five FNs (from five separate patients). Assuming 100% specificity of the diagnostic assay, the FNR and sensitivity in this group of patients with discordant testing was 9.3% (95% CI 1.5–17.0%) and 90.7% (95% CI 82.6–98.9%) respectively. Conclusions Studies to understand the FNR of routinely used assays are important to confirm adequate clinical performance. In this study, most FN results were due to low amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus concentrations in patients with multiple specimens collected during different stages of infection. Post-test clinical evaluation of each patient is advised to ensure that rtRT-PCR results are not the only factor in excluding COVID-19. |
ArticleNumber | 13 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Khan, Muhammad Naeem Pabbaraju, Kanti Diggle, Mathew Hu, Jia Prasad, Abhaya Kanji, Jamil N. Zelyas, Nathan Berenger, Byron M. Tipples, Graham MacDonald, Clayton |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jamil N. orcidid: 0000-0002-1043-6807 surname: Kanji fullname: Kanji, Jamil N. – sequence: 2 givenname: Nathan surname: Zelyas fullname: Zelyas, Nathan – sequence: 3 givenname: Clayton surname: MacDonald fullname: MacDonald, Clayton – sequence: 4 givenname: Kanti surname: Pabbaraju fullname: Pabbaraju, Kanti – sequence: 5 givenname: Muhammad Naeem surname: Khan fullname: Khan, Muhammad Naeem – sequence: 6 givenname: Abhaya surname: Prasad fullname: Prasad, Abhaya – sequence: 7 givenname: Jia surname: Hu fullname: Hu, Jia – sequence: 8 givenname: Mathew surname: Diggle fullname: Diggle, Mathew – sequence: 9 givenname: Byron M. surname: Berenger fullname: Berenger, Byron M. – sequence: 10 givenname: Graham surname: Tipples fullname: Tipples, Graham |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422083$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkktv1DAUhSNURB_wB1igSGzoIuX6EcdmgVQNFAZVKioPsbOc5CZ4lImL7anaf48z05ZOhUBe2Lr-7pHv8dnPdkY3YpY9J3BEiBSvA6FKlgVQUgDhUhXwKNsjFWcFp_THzr3zbrYfwgKAUVGpJ9kuY6kKku1ln07MEDAfsTfRXmLuTcTcdfns7Pv8XUFU_nl2nkcM0Y79m9zkrQ2N860Z4201N6MZroMNT7PH3ST27GY_yL6dvP86-1icnn2Yz45Pi0YwiIXCGjip2w45L9E0lCuZnqLAICWMAaCURqECVtUsTaBYx4wiSGqquo7U7CCbb3RbZxb6wtul8dfaGavXBed7bXy0zYC65mBKxauKouAoRN3StgNJGWlLAtWk9XajdbGql9g2OEZvhi3R7ZvR_tS9u9RVpbggKgm8uhHw7tcqOaKXySEcBjOiWwVNy_QHvKSM_h_llZAloyUk9OUDdOFWPvm8pqRkTAD7Q_UmzWrHzqUnNpOoPhYlCCCCTdTRX6i0WlzaJiWqs6m-1XC41ZCYiFexN6sQ9PzL-Tb74r5_d8bdBiwBdAM03oXgsbtDCOgpxXqTYp1SrNcp1tP48kFTY2PKp5v-wA7_av0NtNXwQg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_15446_dyna_v90n227_107276 crossref_primary_10_1080_1354750X_2021_2016973 crossref_primary_10_3390_bios13050553 crossref_primary_10_17827_aktd_1226153 crossref_primary_10_58854_jicm_1206881 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tmaid_2022_102334 crossref_primary_10_1055_a_1779_9230 crossref_primary_10_3390_jimaging8090237 crossref_primary_10_36659_dae_2023_057 crossref_primary_10_37871_jbres1334 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_854209 crossref_primary_10_3390_biochem1030018 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_snb_2022_131764 crossref_primary_10_4274_nkmj_galenos_2022_37232 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_07756_6 crossref_primary_10_29328_journal_ijcv_1001056 crossref_primary_10_3390_jcm10081586 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aca_2022_340036 crossref_primary_10_1111_eci_13706 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_87688_9 crossref_primary_10_9778_cmajo_20210064 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmv_27932 crossref_primary_10_1159_000538312 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_analchem_2c01325 crossref_primary_10_2478_crdj_2021_0012 crossref_primary_10_1109_TIM_2023_3267355 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00216_022_03918_7 crossref_primary_10_1109_MC_2023_3235880 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12040909 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1074289 crossref_primary_10_7759_cureus_19341 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rinp_2021_104529 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11739_021_02758_0 crossref_primary_10_1021_acsomega_4c00735 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2024_1322797 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_chaos_2024_115869 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_puhe_2021_09_010 crossref_primary_10_1088_1752_7163_ac59c7 crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciab345 crossref_primary_10_18678_dtfd_1021421 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_asjsur_2023_05_002 crossref_primary_10_1097_CJI_0000000000000440 crossref_primary_10_2298_SARH230201074S crossref_primary_10_1002_ccr3_8162 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_medj_2022_01_009 crossref_primary_10_3390_ani11123506 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijregi_2022_11_013 crossref_primary_10_33667_2078_5631_2022_33_40_46 crossref_primary_10_1155_2023_9224815 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_6354579 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jobb_2021_10_001 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12030687 crossref_primary_10_1002_ccr3_5579 crossref_primary_10_3390_app12094694 crossref_primary_10_3390_v13050730 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00210_023_02417_5 crossref_primary_10_1097_SLE_0000000000000971 crossref_primary_10_3390_diseases11010020 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11227_023_05156_9 crossref_primary_10_3390_ai2020016 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_9245248 crossref_primary_10_1080_21681163_2023_2183807 crossref_primary_10_3390_genes13122387 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics13193057 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13665_022_00285_7 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4284685 crossref_primary_10_5664_jcsm_9898 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00521_023_09154_z crossref_primary_10_1080_23744235_2022_2080250 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejro_2022_100456 crossref_primary_10_3389_fmed_2022_868954 crossref_primary_10_1007_s42399_021_01059_z crossref_primary_10_1080_01621459_2024_2313790 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jeconom_2024_105842 crossref_primary_10_4028_p_2gGH9B crossref_primary_10_7197_cmj_1164858 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cca_2023_117759 crossref_primary_10_3343_alm_2023_43_4_392 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2022_36288 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_clinthera_2021_04_016 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_023_00941_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s43055_023_01099_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_applanim_2022_105825 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_trac_2022_116759 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_aca_2025_343872 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_diagmicrobio_2024_116430 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_idcr_2022_e01496 crossref_primary_10_1002_jmv_28416 crossref_primary_10_1039_D1AY00947H crossref_primary_10_1016_j_sintl_2021_100119 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jiac_2022_04_002 crossref_primary_10_12991_jrespharm_1626457 crossref_primary_10_1002_jcla_25149 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737159_2022_2037425 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bios_2025_117145 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0950268822001546 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_51317_y crossref_primary_10_1002_smll_202206349 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmii_2021_09_005 crossref_primary_10_35825_2587_5728_2022_6_1_56_65 crossref_primary_10_3390_pathogens11121442 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00508_022_02028_9 crossref_primary_10_1128_Spectrum_00291_21 crossref_primary_10_3390_bios11120510 crossref_primary_10_1017_cts_2023_540 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_021_98114_5 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40200_022_01002_6 crossref_primary_10_14712_23362936_2023_22 crossref_primary_10_1088_1361_6560_ac34b2 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0262631 crossref_primary_10_3390_info14070370 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10900_021_00988_z crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4019593 crossref_primary_10_18621_eurj_1185361 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1735148 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2023_0982 crossref_primary_10_5812_jjm_116533 crossref_primary_10_1128_spectrum_01477_22 crossref_primary_10_1177_00033197231152941 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_155410 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_microc_2022_107585 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bios_2022_114406 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12092133 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_wneu_2022_07_137 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_4510900 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jmoldx_2021_10_010 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm11101015 crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2022_1042926 crossref_primary_10_1212_CPJ_0000000000001148 crossref_primary_10_3390_bios14010006 crossref_primary_10_1002_lary_30034 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_xcrm_2022_100580 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_022_18735_2 crossref_primary_10_1021_acssensors_1c02450 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00216_021_03831_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_transproceed_2024_11_008 crossref_primary_10_1128_msystems_00671_22 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12553_023_00734_6 crossref_primary_10_61186_rbmb_11_2_358 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13748_023_00312_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cyto_2024_156756 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa091 10.1017/ice.2020.224 10.1148/radiol.2020200642 10.1128/JCM.01110-20 10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493 10.3138/jammi-2020-0026 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.004 10.1101/2020.04.16.20066787 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104433 10.1111/irv.12309 10.7326/M20-1495 10.1093/ofid/ofaa559 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.165 10.1093/infdis/jiaa370 10.1128/JCM.00753-20 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.002 10.1128/JCM.00995-20 10.1093/cid/ciaa848 10.3138/jammi-2020-0012 10.2196/19054 10.1093/cid/ciaa722 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2021 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2021 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12985-021-01489-0 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine Biology Public Health |
EISSN | 1743-422X |
EndPage | 13 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_b40a594772e64e66bd2df08231d5107b PMC7794619 A650601633 33422083 10_1186_s12985_021_01489_0 |
Genre | Journal Article Report |
GeographicLocations | Canada Alberta Canada Alberta |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: Canada – name: Alberta Canada – name: Alberta |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 123 29Q 2WC 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IGS IHR INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 LGEZI LOTEE M1P M48 M~E NADUK NXXTH O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7U9 7XB 8FK AZQEC COVID DWQXO H94 K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-9eb041bdfe445eac249808390ae213300e88a9e9037b317493f3a91e1b29ff1b3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1743-422X |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:43 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:52:32 EDT 2025 Tue Aug 05 10:04:39 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:38:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 07:37:52 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:43:44 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:24:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:03:35 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:04:00 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:44:46 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:04 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | COVID-19 Discordant testing SARS-CoV-2 False negative rate |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c630t-9eb041bdfe445eac249808390ae213300e88a9e9037b317493f3a91e1b29ff1b3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Report-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-1043-6807 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2478833603?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 33422083 |
PQID | 2478833603 |
PQPubID | 55248 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b40a594772e64e66bd2df08231d5107b pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7794619 proquest_miscellaneous_2574345232 proquest_miscellaneous_2476853250 proquest_journals_2478833603 gale_infotracmisc_A650601633 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A650601633 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A650601633 pubmed_primary_33422083 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12985_021_01489_0 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12985_021_01489_0 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-01-09 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-01-09 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 01 year: 2021 text: 2021-01-09 day: 09 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Virology journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Virol J |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | CM Dugdale (1489_CR9) 2020 E Avaniss-Aghajani (1489_CR25) 2020 CP West (1489_CR29) 2020; 95 DA Green (1489_CR22) 2020 K Pabbaraju (1489_CR17) 2020 DR Long (1489_CR1) 2020 Y Yang (1489_CR6) 2020 K Pabbaraju (1489_CR19) 2020; 9 PS Sullivan (1489_CR23) 2020; 6 NN Kinloch (1489_CR3) 2020; 222 ME Doll (1489_CR13) 2020 1489_CR12 A Afzal (1489_CR26) 2020 1489_CR11 X He (1489_CR8) 2020; 26 1489_CR16 1489_CR15 I Arevalo-Rodriguez (1489_CR2) 2020 JN Kanji (1489_CR18) 2020 LM Kucirka (1489_CR4) 2020; 173 JJ LeBlanc (1489_CR20) 2020; 128 AJ Jamal (1489_CR28) 2020 Y Pan (1489_CR7) 2020; 66 1489_CR5 1489_CR21 MG Thompson (1489_CR24) 2015; 9 T Ai (1489_CR14) 2020; 296 G Cao (1489_CR10) 2020 1489_CR27 |
References_xml | – volume: 66 start-page: 794 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR7 publication-title: Clin Chem doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa091 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR13 publication-title: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.224 – volume: 296 start-page: E32 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR14 publication-title: Radiology doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR17 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.01110-20 – ident: 1489_CR12 – ident: 1489_CR27 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR6 publication-title: MedRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.02.11.20021493 – volume: 9 start-page: 965 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR19 publication-title: J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Canada doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0026 – volume: 95 start-page: 1127 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR29 publication-title: Mayo Clin Proc doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.04.004 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR2 publication-title: medRxiv doi: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20066787 – volume: 26 start-page: 672 issue: 5 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR8 publication-title: Nat Med doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0869-5 – volume: 128 start-page: 104433 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR20 publication-title: J Clin Virol doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104433 – volume: 9 start-page: 155 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: 1489_CR24 publication-title: Influenza Other Respir Viruses doi: 10.1111/irv.12309 – volume: 173 start-page: 262 issue: 4 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR4 publication-title: Ann Intern Med doi: 10.7326/M20-1495 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR9 publication-title: Open Forum Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa559 – ident: 1489_CR16 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR10 publication-title: Jpn J Infect Dis doi: 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2020.165 – volume: 222 start-page: 899 issue: 6 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR3 publication-title: J Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa370 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR25 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.00753-20 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR26 publication-title: J Adv Res doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.08.002 – ident: 1489_CR11 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR22 publication-title: J Clin Microbiol doi: 10.1128/JCM.00995-20 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR28 publication-title: Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa848 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR18 publication-title: Off J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Canada doi: 10.3138/jammi-2020-0012 – ident: 1489_CR21 – ident: 1489_CR5 – ident: 1489_CR15 – volume: 6 start-page: e19054 issue: 2 year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR23 publication-title: JMIR Public Health Surveill doi: 10.2196/19054 – year: 2020 ident: 1489_CR1 publication-title: Clin Infect Dis doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa722 |
SSID | ssj0032679 |
Score | 2.6038988 |
Snippet | COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of many... Background COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of... BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR). Performance of... Abstract Background COVID-19 is diagnosed via detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA using real time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR).... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 13 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Alberta Canada clinical examination Coronaviruses COVID-19 COVID-19 - diagnosis COVID-19 - virology COVID-19 infection COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - statistics & numerical data Discordant testing DNA-directed RNA polymerase Evaluation False negative rate False Negative Reactions False negative results Female Genes Health aspects Humans Infections Male Medical laboratories Middle Aged Molecular Diagnostic Techniques - statistics & numerical data nucleocapsid Nucleocapsids Pandemics Patients Polymerase chain reaction Public health Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction Ribonucleic acid RNA SARS-CoV-2 SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification Sensitivity and Specificity Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Short Report Viral envelope proteins Viral proteins virology viruses |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9QwFA-yoHgRXb_qrhJF8CBl0yRNGm_r6LC74AerK3sLSZuMgnRkZ-bgf-97STtMEdaL1-altL-8vA_y8nuEvExnQzywMtRMlFJrXToWulJ22Ok4mrbLVb4f1cmFPLusL3dafWFNWKYHzsAdeclcbeAlPCgZlPId7yIeD1UdqJP2aH3B543JVLbBEJNoM16RadTRCrxagzeRMXWWWCQ0cUOJrf9vm7zjlKYFkzseaH6X3BlCR3qcP_keuRH6fXIzN5P8vU9ufRiOye-TszkoVaB9WCRab4p0EHQZ6ezTt9N3ZWXo59k5XSO_Rr94Qx3Fq7mQhALI41PqBrKSB-Ri_v7r7KQcmiaUrRJsXZrgmax8F4OUNVhVQLyBMMswFzjko4yFpnEmGCa0h9hBGhGFM1WoPDcxVl48JHv9sg-PCW1bxpyqXQSHJo0Enasa7UzkndcxNF1BqhFD2w6M4tjY4qdNmUWjbMbdAu424W5ZQV5v5_zKfBrXSr_FpdlKIhd2egAaYgcNsf_SkIK8wIW1yHbRYznNwm1WK3v65dweqzrx0QhRkFeDUFzCP7RuuJ0ASCBB1kTycCIJ27GdDo_6YwdzsLIcmxQIoRgMP98O40wscevDcpNkFMROEJJeI1NDwCdriIIL8iir5BYbISTnsNIF0RNlnYA3Hel_fE-E4hq7DFTmyf9A-4Dc5nmflcwckr311SY8hbht7Z-lLfoHYjw5QA priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96oggiun5VT4ki-CDh0iZNG1_kXF3uDvzg9GTfQtomqyDtebv74H_vTJrWK8K-NlNoM9_JzG8IeRnuhjLHmcu5YLIoCma5a5hscNKx13XTV_l-Ukdn8mSZL-OB2zqWVQ42MRjqpqvxjPwgQ5x3IRQXb89_M5wahbercYTGVXINocuwpKtYjgkXRCYBaw-DbiazbDk0zZTqYA1-rsTeZEymJZYNTRxTwO__30pfclPTEspLPmlxh9yOwSQ97Ll_l1xx7Yxc78dL_pmRGx_jxfmM3OqP52jfdXSPnCxA7Bxt3SoAf1MEjKCdp_PP34_fs1TTL_NTukEEjnb1hlqKzbuQpgIbhqfURjiT--Rs8eHb_IjFsQqsVoJvmHYVl2nVeCdlDnYXeFJCIKa5dRlkrJy7srTaaS6KCqILqYUXVqcurTLtfVqJB2Sv7Vr3iNC65tyq3HpweVJLkMq0LKz2WVMV3pVNQtJhT00dMcdx9MUvE3KPUpmeDwb4YAIfDE_I6_Gd8x5xYyf1O2TVSIlo2eFBd7EyUflMJbnNNQhi5pR0SlVN1ni8YkwbMElFlZAXyGiDeBgtFtys7Ha9NsdfT82hygNijRAJeRWJfAf_UNvYvwA7gRBaE8r9CSUobD1dHuTJRIOxNv_EOyHPx2V8E4vgWtdtA42C6AqC1h00OQi7zCFOTsjDXkTHvREClAA4nZBiIryTzZuutD9_BMjxAucQpPrx7k9_Qm5mvUYxrvfJ3uZi655CzLapngXF_AtSUzhr priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | False negative rate of COVID-19 PCR testing: a discordant testing analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33422083 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2478833603 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2476853250 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2574345232 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7794619 https://doaj.org/article/b40a594772e64e66bd2df08231d5107b |
Volume | 18 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3ra9swED_6YKVfxta9vHVBG4N9GN5kS7aswRhp1tAG2pV0GfkmZFvKBsXZ8oD1v99JtkPNun4yWCeD7qG7s06_A3jjz4ZiQ0OTUBZyIUSoqSlDXrpOx1YWZV3le56eTPhomky3oG131DBweWtq5_pJTRZX7__8vv6MBv_JG3yWfliiz8rcPWOXGHNXArQNu-iZhDPUM745VcBIRcj24syt8_ZhjzEexzRjHT_l4fz_3bRveK1uReUNFzV8APeb2JL0a2V4CFumOoB7dbfJ6wPYO2vO0R_BaIirN6QyM4_7TRxeBJlbMvj6_fRLGElyMRiTlQPgqGYfiSbu7i5mqSiF9i3RDZrJY5gMj78NTsKmq0JYpIyuQmlyyqO8tIbzBLddFEmG65VUmxgTVkpNlmlpJGUix-CCS2aZlpGJ8lhaG-XsCexU88o8A1IUlOo00RY9HpcclTLKhJY2LnNhTVYGELU8VEUDOe46X1wpn3pkqapFoFAEyotA0QDebeb8qgE37qQ-cqLZUDqwbP9ivpipxvZUzqlOJOphbFJu0jQv49K6E8aoxB1J5AG8doJVDg6jcvU2M71eLtXp5Vj108QD1jAWwNuGyM5xDYVuri8gJxyCVofysEOJ9lp0h1v9Ua26q9h1MWAspTj8ajPsZroauMrM154mxeAKY9Y7aBKMCHmCYXIAT2uV3PCm1ewAREdZO8zrjlQ_f3jEceHaEETy-X-_-QL249qOQioPYWe1WJuXGK2t8h5si6nowW6_P7oc4fPo-Pxi3PP_PnrePP8Cpnw5ag |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1ZbxMxEB6VVhwSQhCuhQIGgXhAq3pt72EkhNq0UdIjVGmL8mb28AYktClNItQ_xW9kZo_QFVLe-rqejZy5vZ75BuBteTckLHetz6WrwjB0Y24zV2U06TjXaVZV-Q6D_pnaH_vjNfjT9MJQWWXjE0tHnU1T-ka-JQjnXcqAy8_nv1yaGkW3q80IjUotDuzlbzyyzT4NdlG-74To7Z12-249VcBNA8nnrrYJV16S5VYpH90ObinCPETz2Ao8sHFuoyjWVnMZJhhclZa5jLVnvUToPPcSib97AzYUbgUdwcbO3vB41Ph-zIVKdD9K810lxLhp04mCrRlG1oi6oen4rqhQqRUKy4kB_8eFK4GxXbR5JQr27sO9On1l25W-PYA1W3TgZjXQ8rIDt47qq_oO3K0-CLKqz-kh7PdQ0S0r7KSEGmcEUcGmOet--TrYdT3NjrsjNifMj2LykcWM2oWRyyj45imLawCVR3B2LSx_DOvFtLBPgaUp53HgxzkGWaUV2oEXhbHORZaEuY0yB7yGpyatUc5p2MZPU552osBUcjAoB1PKwXAHPizfOa8wPlZS75ColpSEz10-mF5MTG3uJlE89jWqvrCBskGQZCLL6VLTy9AJhokDb0jQhhA4CirxmcSL2cwMTkZmO_BLjBwpHXhfE-VT_A9pXHdMICcItKtFudmiRBeRtpcbfTK1i5qZfwblwOvlMr1JZXeFnS5KmgDzOUyTV9D4qOzKx8zcgSeVii55IyUaAUragbClvC3mtVeKH99LkPOQJh94-tnqrb-C2_3To0NzOBgePIc7orIul-tNWJ9fLOwLzBjnycvaTBl8u27P8BeXh3Wg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=False+negative+rate+of+COVID-19+PCR+testing%3A+a+discordant+testing+analysis&rft.jtitle=Virology+journal&rft.au=Kanji%2C+Jamil+N&rft.au=Zelyas%2C+Nathan&rft.au=MacDonald%2C+Clayton&rft.au=Pabbaraju%2C+Kanti&rft.date=2021-01-09&rft.eissn=1743-422X&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12985-021-01489-0&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F33422083&rft.externalDocID=33422083 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1743-422X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1743-422X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1743-422X&client=summon |