RNA-Seq reveals different responses to drought in Neotropical trees from savannas and seasonally dry forests

Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address ph...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC plant biology Vol. 21; no. 1; p. 463
Main Authors Sobreiro, Mariane B., Collevatti, Rosane G., dos Santos, Yuri L. A., Bandeira, Ludmila F., Lopes, Francis J. F., Novaes, Evandro
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 12.10.2021
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
AbstractList BACKGROUND: Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. RESULTS: Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. CONCLUSION: Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems.BACKGROUNDWater is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems.Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response.RESULTSUsing a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response.Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).CONCLUSIONOur findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species x 2 treatments (drought and wet) x 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
Background Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Results Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species x 2 treatments (drought and wet) x 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. Conclusion Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF). Keywords: Bignoniaceae, Differential gene expression, Water deficit, Plasticity, Tabebuia Alliance, Transcription factors
Abstract Background Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their metabolism by altering gene expression. This leads to phenotypic plasticity, which aids rapid adaptation to climate changes. Here, we address phenotypic plasticity under drought stress by analyzing differentially expressed genes (DEG) in four phylogenetically related neotropical Bignoniaceae tree species: two from savanna, Handroanthus ochraceus and Tabebuia aurea, and two from seasonally dry tropical forests (SDTF), Handroanthus impetiginosus and Handroanthus serratifolius. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of an RNA-Seq study comparing tree species from seasonally dry tropical forest and savanna ecosystems. Results Using a completely randomized block design with 4 species × 2 treatments (drought and wet) × 3 blocks (24 plants) and an RNA-seq approach, we detected a higher number of DEGs between treatments for the SDTF species H. serratifolius (3153 up-regulated and 2821 down-regulated under drought) and H. impetiginosus (332 and 207), than for the savanna species. H. ochraceus showed the lowest number of DEGs, with only five up and nine down-regulated genes, while T. aurea exhibited 242 up- and 96 down-regulated genes. The number of shared DEGs among species was not related to habitat of origin or phylogenetic relationship, since both T. aurea and H impetiginosus shared a similar number of DEGs with H. serratifolius. All four species shared a low number of enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and, in general, exhibited different mechanisms of response to water deficit. We also found 175 down-regulated and 255 up-regulated transcription factors from several families, indicating the importance of these master regulators in drought response. Conclusion Our findings show that phylogenetically related species may respond differently at gene expression level to drought stress. Savanna species seem to be less responsive to drought at the transcriptional level, likely due to morphological and anatomical adaptations to seasonal drought. The species with the largest geographic range and widest edaphic-climatic niche, H. serratifolius, was the most responsive, exhibiting the highest number of DEG and up- and down-regulated transcription factors (TF).
ArticleNumber 463
Audience Academic
Author Lopes, Francis J. F.
Bandeira, Ludmila F.
dos Santos, Yuri L. A.
Novaes, Evandro
Collevatti, Rosane G.
Sobreiro, Mariane B.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Mariane B.
  surname: Sobreiro
  fullname: Sobreiro, Mariane B.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Rosane G.
  surname: Collevatti
  fullname: Collevatti, Rosane G.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yuri L. A.
  surname: dos Santos
  fullname: dos Santos, Yuri L. A.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Ludmila F.
  surname: Bandeira
  fullname: Bandeira, Ludmila F.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Francis J. F.
  surname: Lopes
  fullname: Lopes, Francis J. F.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Evandro
  surname: Novaes
  fullname: Novaes, Evandro
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkktvEzEUhUeoiD7gD7BAI7GBxRS_xvZskKKKR6SqSC2srTt-pI4m49R2IvLvcZIWmgqBvBjr-jvHmuNzWh2NYbRV9Rqjc4wl_5AwkQI1iOAGUcJYI55VJ5gJ3BBCuqNH--PqNKU5QlhI1r2ojinjrOzRSTVcX02aG3tXR7u2MKTaeOdstGMuk7QMY7KpzqE2Maxmt7n2Y31lQ45h6TUMdY62nLsYFnWCNYwjpBpGUycLKYwwDJui3NQuFLOcXlbPXbnDvrr_nlU_Pn_6fvG1ufz2ZXoxuWw0pyg3EgMlvTUdxrY3rWPctZwQJiztWgyul1oC51YwCsJyiwlQ6XqjwWjCe07Pqune1wSYq2X0C4gbFcCr3SDEmYKYvR6swl3bg-Q9E61hDoxse-yEob1GWhoOxevj3mu56hfW6JJMhOHA9PBk9LdqFtZKtkhQ1BWDd_cGMdytSgxq4ZO2wwCjDaukCKe87ShF8v9oK7EkDElW0LdP0HlYxZL4jqKYI0HaP9QMyr_60ZWXA701VRMucUmb7qjzv1BlGbvwunTO-TI_ELw_EBQm2595BquU1PTm-pB98zi_38E9VLAAcg_oGFKK1intM2QftnH6QWGktm1X-7ar0na1a7sSRUqeSB_c_yH6BW8-AN4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2023_1106104
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41437_021_00491_0
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2023_1150204
Cites_doi 10.1093/nar/30.1.276
10.1186/s12862-014-0213-0
10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7
10.1002/joc.5958
10.5194/bg-12-2927-2015
10.1111/gcb.13685
10.1007/s00442-004-1595-2
10.1242/bio.035279
10.1186/1471-2164-13-364
10.3732/ajb.0900004
10.1007/s11105-014-0759-4
10.1093/jxb/ert185
10.1007/s10142-018-0608-x
10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.010
10.1016/j.plgene.2017.09.004
10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
10.1371/journal.pone.0199774
10.1007/s11105-015-0892-8
10.1093/BIOLINNEAN/BLX163
10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
10.3389/fpls.2014.00086
10.1093/bioinformatics/btq614
10.1186/s12870-016-0800-x
10.1201/9780203705315-7
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.004
10.1093/treephys/28.3.395
10.1093/nar/gkw982
10.1093/jxb/erv481
10.1093/nar/gky299
10.1186/1471-2164-12-538
10.1201/9781420004496
10.1111/mec.12071
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.072
10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00777.x
10.1111/tpj.12832
10.4236/ajps.2013.44098
10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.139
10.1186/s12862-016-0779-9
10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x
10.1186/1471-2229-13-229
10.3389/fgene.2019.00055
10.1111/btp.12095
10.1007/s00468-015-1351-8
10.1093/gigascience/gix125
10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
10.1073/pnas.1530509100
10.1093/nar/gkx382
10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
10.1038/s41598-018-30150-0
10.1007/s10725-014-9969-x
10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
10.3389/fpls.2015.00895
10.1101/gr.772403
10.1186/s40064-016-2460-6
10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
10.3389/fpls.2016.01029
10.1186/1471-2105-4-41
10.1093/nar/gkh063
10.2307/2845050
10.1093/nar/gkh036
10.1126/science.1247355
10.1186/s12870-015-0493-6
10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
10.1038/nature06025
10.1038/s41437-019-0188-0
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.006
10.1007/s11738-017-2587-2
10.1071/FP03236
10.2307/2399937
10.1105/tpc.16.00182
10.3389/fpls.2016.00371
10.1007/s00704-013-1019-5
10.1186/s12870-016-0760-1
10.1371/journal.pone.0202213
10.3390/plants8090327
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2021. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.
2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2021
Copyright_xml – notice: 2021. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2021
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12870-021-03244-7
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Journals
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Open Access Full Text
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Agricultural Science Database




Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1471-2229
EndPage 463
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_195ba86b475d4fad85b1f7d3bc0c8d6a
PMC8507309
A681630325
34641780
10_1186_s12870_021_03244_7
Genre Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations Brazil
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Brazil
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
2XV
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X2
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
APEBS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAG
IAO
IEP
IGH
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
M7N
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-81a32bed911ebd5f46f562247e3951afb8c8a66e743a7e6e12a38fbdcadc26b63
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2229
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:12 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:04:11 EDT 2025
Tue Aug 05 09:57:25 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:11:47 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:44:31 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:09:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:48:27 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:10:27 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 06:58:11 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:52:29 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:00:01 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Transcription factors
Bignoniaceae
Tabebuia Alliance
Differential gene expression
Water deficit
Plasticity
Language English
License 2021. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c630t-81a32bed911ebd5f46f562247e3951afb8c8a66e743a7e6e12a38fbdcadc26b63
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/195ba86b475d4fad85b1f7d3bc0c8d6a
PMID 34641780
PQID 2583160725
PQPubID 44650
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_195ba86b475d4fad85b1f7d3bc0c8d6a
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8507309
proquest_miscellaneous_2636593308
proquest_miscellaneous_2581824084
proquest_journals_2583160725
gale_infotracmisc_A681630325
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A681630325
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A681630325
pubmed_primary_34641780
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12870_021_03244_7
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_021_03244_7
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2021-10-12
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2021-10-12
PublicationDate_xml – month: 10
  year: 2021
  text: 2021-10-12
  day: 12
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC plant biology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Plant Biol
PublicationYear 2021
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References 3244_CR19
GM Locosselli (3244_CR2) 2016; 30
DC Lahti (3244_CR8) 2009; 24
OB Silva-Junior (3244_CR40) 2018; 7
3244_CR15
3244_CR12
3244_CR56
Z Avramova (3244_CR4) 2015; 83
LC Vitorino (3244_CR39) 2018; 123
PA Furley (3244_CR32) 1988; 15
M Abid (3244_CR50) 2018; 8
3244_CR55
T Lassmann (3244_CR69) 2011; 27
3244_CR10
3244_CR54
X Wang (3244_CR5) 2015; 75
3244_CR3
G Goldstein (3244_CR41) 2008; 28
3244_CR51
RG Collevatti (3244_CR36) 2019; 123
H Ma (3244_CR63) 2016; 34
X Cui (3244_CR61) 2018; 18
WA Hoffmann (3244_CR43) 2004; 140
3244_CR47
3244_CR45
(3244_CR53) 2015
S Chander (3244_CR60) 2018; 150
JD Storey (3244_CR71) 2003; 100
E Villar (3244_CR17) 2011; 12
S Tang (3244_CR16) 2015; 33
CER Lehmann (3244_CR9) 2014; 343
R Devi (3244_CR52) 2007; 61
EM Veenendaal (3244_CR31) 2015; 12
W Feng (3244_CR48) 2016; 28
A Ali (3244_CR1) 2019; 647
L-M Chevin (3244_CR7) 2010; 8
T Tian (3244_CR83) 2017; 45
S George (3244_CR49) 2017; 12
J Jin (3244_CR85) 2017; 45
X Zhang (3244_CR24) 2007; 448
AB Nicotra (3244_CR44) 2010; 15
S Munné-Bosch (3244_CR46) 2004; 31
G Ye (3244_CR22) 2018; 13
R Lande (3244_CR6) 2009; 22
H Guo (3244_CR14) 2016; 67
3244_CR78
LC Vitorino (3244_CR37) 2016; 16
M New (3244_CR23) 2011; 369
RG Collevatti (3244_CR38) 2014; 14
Y Darzi (3244_CR84) 2018; 46
X Tan (3244_CR57) 2019; 8
U Bechtold (3244_CR62) 2013; 64
RC Mendonça (3244_CR30) 2008
L Damberg (3244_CR26) 2014; 117
A Fracasso (3244_CR13) 2016; 16
A Bateman (3244_CR81) 2021; 49
3244_CR77
3244_CR76
3244_CR75
SF Altschul (3244_CR82) 1990; 215
JS Lima (3244_CR28) 2017; 23
DE Prado (3244_CR34) 1993; 80
L Xu (3244_CR25) 2019; 39
A Dobin (3244_CR68) 2013; 29
Y Dong (3244_CR58) 2014; 450
A Bateman (3244_CR80) 2002; 30
AM Bolger (3244_CR67) 2014; 30
PD Thomas (3244_CR79) 2003; 13
RG Collevatti (3244_CR27) 2013; 04
Y Jiang (3244_CR64) 2018; 40
BR Thumma (3244_CR18) 2012; 13
RT Pennington (3244_CR29) 2006
S Anders (3244_CR70) 2015; 31
R Joshi (3244_CR66) 2016; 7
MD Robinson (3244_CR73) 2009; 26
3244_CR21
3244_CR65
3244_CR20
Y Wang (3244_CR59) 2016; 5
P Li (3244_CR74) 2015; 16
MI Love (3244_CR72) 2014; 15
RG Olmstead (3244_CR33) 2009; 96
Y Ding (3244_CR11) 2013; 13
RG Collevatti (3244_CR35) 2012; 21
WA Hoffmann (3244_CR42) 2003; 91
References_xml – volume: 30
  start-page: 276
  year: 2002
  ident: 3244_CR80
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.276
– volume: 14
  start-page: 213
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR38
  publication-title: BMC Evol Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s12862-014-0213-0
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR50
  publication-title: Sci Rep
– volume: 16
  start-page: 347
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR74
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0778-7
– volume: 39
  start-page: 2375
  year: 2019
  ident: 3244_CR25
  publication-title: Int J Climatol
  doi: 10.1002/joc.5958
– volume: 12
  start-page: 2927
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR31
  publication-title: Biogeosciences.
  doi: 10.5194/bg-12-2927-2015
– volume: 369
  start-page: 9
  year: 2011
  ident: 3244_CR23
  publication-title: Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci
– volume: 23
  start-page: 4639
  year: 2017
  ident: 3244_CR28
  publication-title: Glob Chang Biol
  doi: 10.1111/gcb.13685
– volume-title: Biochemistry & molecular biology of plants
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR53
– volume: 140
  start-page: 252
  year: 2004
  ident: 3244_CR43
  publication-title: Oecologia.
  doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1595-2
– ident: 3244_CR51
  doi: 10.1242/bio.035279
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1
  year: 2012
  ident: 3244_CR18
  publication-title: BMC Genomics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-364
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1731
  year: 2009
  ident: 3244_CR33
  publication-title: Am J Bot
  doi: 10.3732/ajb.0900004
– volume: 33
  start-page: 424
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR16
  publication-title: Plant Mol Biol Report
  doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0759-4
– volume: 64
  start-page: 3467
  year: 2013
  ident: 3244_CR62
  publication-title: J Exp Bot
  doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert185
– volume: 18
  start-page: 489
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR61
  publication-title: Funct Integr Genomics
  doi: 10.1007/s10142-018-0608-x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 487
  year: 2009
  ident: 3244_CR8
  publication-title: Trends in Ecology and Evolution
  doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.010
– volume: 12
  start-page: 114
  year: 2017
  ident: 3244_CR49
  publication-title: Plant Gene
  doi: 10.1016/j.plgene.2017.09.004
– volume: 31
  start-page: 166
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR70
  publication-title: Bioinformatics.
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638
– ident: 3244_CR45
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199774
– volume: 34
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR63
  publication-title: Plant Mol Biol Report
  doi: 10.1007/s11105-015-0892-8
– volume: 123
  start-page: 561
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR39
  publication-title: Biol J Linn Soc
  doi: 10.1093/BIOLINNEAN/BLX163
– volume: 29
  start-page: 15
  year: 2013
  ident: 3244_CR68
  publication-title: Bioinformatics.
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635
– ident: 3244_CR19
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00086
– volume: 27
  start-page: 130
  year: 2011
  ident: 3244_CR69
  publication-title: Bioinformatics.
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq614
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR13
  publication-title: BMC Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0800-x
– ident: 3244_CR56
– ident: 3244_CR21
  doi: 10.1201/9780203705315-7
– volume: 150
  start-page: 88
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR60
  publication-title: Environ Exp Bot
  doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.02.004
– volume: 28
  start-page: 395
  year: 2008
  ident: 3244_CR41
  publication-title: Tree Physiol
  doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.3.395
– volume: 45
  start-page: D1040
  year: 2017
  ident: 3244_CR85
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw982
– volume: 67
  start-page: 681
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR14
  publication-title: J Exp Bot
  doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv481
– volume: 46
  start-page: W510
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR84
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gky299
– volume: 12
  start-page: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 3244_CR17
  publication-title: BMC Genomics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-538
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Neotropical savannas and seasonally dry forests
  year: 2006
  ident: 3244_CR29
  doi: 10.1201/9781420004496
– volume: 21
  start-page: 5845
  year: 2012
  ident: 3244_CR35
  publication-title: Mol Ecol
  doi: 10.1111/mec.12071
– volume: 647
  start-page: 1211
  year: 2019
  ident: 3244_CR1
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.072
– volume: 91
  start-page: 475
  year: 2003
  ident: 3244_CR42
  publication-title: J Ecol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00777.x
– volume: 83
  start-page: 149
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR4
  publication-title: Plant J
  doi: 10.1111/tpj.12832
– volume: 04
  start-page: 792
  year: 2013
  ident: 3244_CR27
  publication-title: Am J Plant Sci
  doi: 10.4236/ajps.2013.44098
– volume: 450
  start-page: 453
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR58
  publication-title: Biochem Biophys Res Commun
  doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.05.139
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR37
  publication-title: BMC Evol Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s12862-016-0779-9
– volume: 49
  start-page: D480
  year: 2021
  ident: 3244_CR81
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
– volume: 26
  start-page: 139
  year: 2009
  ident: 3244_CR73
  publication-title: Bioinformatics.
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1435
  year: 2009
  ident: 3244_CR6
  publication-title: J Evol Biol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01754.x
– volume: 13
  start-page: 229
  year: 2013
  ident: 3244_CR11
  publication-title: BMC Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-229
– ident: 3244_CR3
  doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00055
– ident: 3244_CR10
  doi: 10.1111/btp.12095
– volume: 30
  start-page: 1127
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR2
  publication-title: Trees - Struct Funct
  doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1351-8
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR40
  publication-title: Gigascience.
  doi: 10.1093/gigascience/gix125
– ident: 3244_CR15
  doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00055
– volume: 30
  start-page: 2114
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR67
  publication-title: Bioinformatics.
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
– volume: 100
  start-page: 9440
  year: 2003
  ident: 3244_CR71
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100
– volume: 45
  start-page: 122
  year: 2017
  ident: 3244_CR83
  publication-title: Nucleic Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx382
– volume: 8
  start-page: e1000357
  year: 2010
  ident: 3244_CR7
  publication-title: PLoS Biol
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357
– ident: 3244_CR55
  doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30150-0
– volume: 75
  start-page: 677
  year: 2015
  ident: 3244_CR5
  publication-title: Plant Growth Regul
  doi: 10.1007/s10725-014-9969-x
– ident: 3244_CR20
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01147
– ident: 3244_CR65
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00895
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2129
  year: 2003
  ident: 3244_CR79
  publication-title: Genome Res
  doi: 10.1101/gr.772403
– volume: 5
  start-page: 819
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR59
  publication-title: Springerplus.
  doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2460-6
– volume: 215
  start-page: 403
  year: 1990
  ident: 3244_CR82
  publication-title: J Mol Biol
  doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1029
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR66
  publication-title: Front Plant Sci
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01029
– ident: 3244_CR78
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-4-41
– ident: 3244_CR77
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh063
– volume: 15
  start-page: 97
  year: 1988
  ident: 3244_CR32
  publication-title: J Biogeogr
  doi: 10.2307/2845050
– ident: 3244_CR76
  doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh036
– volume: 343
  start-page: 548
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR9
  publication-title: Science (80- )
  doi: 10.1126/science.1247355
– ident: 3244_CR47
  doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0493-6
– volume: 15
  start-page: 684
  year: 2010
  ident: 3244_CR44
  publication-title: Trends Plant Sci
  doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.09.008
– volume: 15
  start-page: 550
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR72
  publication-title: Genome Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8
– volume: 448
  start-page: 461
  year: 2007
  ident: 3244_CR24
  publication-title: Nature.
  doi: 10.1038/nature06025
– volume: 123
  start-page: 117
  year: 2019
  ident: 3244_CR36
  publication-title: Heredity (Edinb)
  doi: 10.1038/s41437-019-0188-0
– volume-title: Flora vascular do bioma Cerrado: checklist com 12.356 espécies
  year: 2008
  ident: 3244_CR30
– volume: 61
  start-page: 167
  year: 2007
  ident: 3244_CR52
  publication-title: Environ Exp Bot
  doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.006
– volume: 40
  start-page: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR64
  publication-title: Acta Physiol Plant
  doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2587-2
– volume: 31
  start-page: 203
  year: 2004
  ident: 3244_CR46
  publication-title: Funct Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1071/FP03236
– ident: 3244_CR75
– volume: 80
  start-page: 902
  year: 1993
  ident: 3244_CR34
  publication-title: Ann Missouri Bot Gard
  doi: 10.2307/2399937
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1769
  year: 2016
  ident: 3244_CR48
  publication-title: Plant Cell
  doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00182
– ident: 3244_CR12
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00371
– volume: 117
  start-page: 441
  year: 2014
  ident: 3244_CR26
  publication-title: Theor Appl Climatol
  doi: 10.1007/s00704-013-1019-5
– ident: 3244_CR54
  doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0760-1
– volume: 13
  start-page: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 3244_CR22
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202213
– volume: 8
  start-page: 327
  year: 2019
  ident: 3244_CR57
  publication-title: Plants.
  doi: 10.3390/plants8090327
SSID ssj0017849
Score 2.3487494
Snippet Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly adjust their...
Background Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly...
BACKGROUND: Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can rapidly...
Abstract Background Water is one of the main limiting factors for plant growth and crop productivity. Plants constantly monitor water availability and can...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 463
SubjectTerms Abiotic stress
Adaptation
Adaptation, Physiological - genetics
Bignoniaceae
Bignoniaceae - genetics
Biological Products
Brazil
climate
Climate adaptation
Climate Change
Crop production
Dehydration
Differential gene expression
Drought
Droughts
Dry forests
Ecosystem
Environmental aspects
Environmental conditions
Forests
Forests and forestry
Gene expression
gene expression regulation
Gene Expression Regulation, Plant
gene ontology
Genes
Genes, Plant
Genetic aspects
Genetic Variation
Genomes
geographical distribution
Grassland
Grasslands
habitats
Handroanthus impetiginosus
Handroanthus ochraceus
Handroanthus serratifolius
Hardiness
Metabolism
Neotropics
Phenotypic plasticity
Phylogeny
Physiological aspects
Plant growth
Plant species
Plants
Plastic properties
Plasticity
Rain
Ribonucleic acid
RNA
RNA sequencing
RNA-Seq
Savannahs
Savannas
sequence analysis
Soil fertility
Species
Tabebuia - genetics
Tabebuia Alliance
Tabebuia aurea
Temperature
transcription (genetics)
Transcription factors
Trees
Tropical forests
Tropical plants
Water availability
Water deficit
Water monitoring
water stress
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Open Access Full Text
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQxYEL4k2gRQYhcUBRk_gR57hFVAWJPbRU6s3yEyqtktJkD_vvO-NkVxshlQtXe6xYM2P7czzzDSEfmYtlXfAyj5Vvcu4czy0LNndKSGu9LURKEvuxlGeX_PuVuNor9YUxYSM98Ki447IR1ihpeS08j8YrYctYe2Zd4ZSXCRrBmbe9TE3vB7XizTZFRsnjvsT3vBzDEQpAEDyvZ8dQYuv_e0_eO5TmAZN7J9DpE_J4go50MU75KXkQ2mfk4UkH8G7znKzOl4v8IvyhyMkEPkW3pU8GaElxsKGnQ0d9qssz0OuWLkM33HY3aCaKj9M9xWQT2htA163pqWk9xX-ICNZXGxi5oQBxYcr9C3J5-vXnl7N8KqWQO8mKIVelYZUNHra2YL2IXEYAPhWvAwOIZaJVThkpA-AJUwcZysowFa13xrtKWslekoO2a8NrQhmLDCSDkI0C2zobal8GFgpfKiuEzUi51ax2E884lrtY6XTfUFKP1tBgDZ2soeuMfN6NuRlZNu6VPkGD7SSRITs1gN_oyW_0v_wmIx_Q3Bo5MFoMsvll1n2vv12c64VUgFLhYyIjnyahCAYxzkw5C6AJpM2aSR7OJGGRunn31qv0tEn0uhKKIb8fdr_fdeNIDHxrQ7dOMnAD5IXi98hIJgX-mFIZeTU66k43jEsOq6HISD1z4Zny5j3t9e9EM64Ebv_Nm_-h7bfkUYWrL4UCHZKD4XYdjgDNDfZdWrh3X3pJAA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lj9MwELZg4cAF8SawIIOQOKBok_jZE-oiVgsSPeyyUm-WX1lWqpJukx7675lx07IRUq_2WIk8D3-2x98Q8on5ulQFL_O6CpOce89zx6LLvRbSueAKkR6J_ZrJ8yv-cy7mw4FbN6RV7mJiCtSh9XhGflIJzZAMrRJfl7c5Vo3C29WhhMZ98gCpyzClS833G65SaT7ZPZTR8qQr8VYvx6SEAnAEz9VoMUqc_f9H5jtL0zht8s46dPaEPB4AJJ1uNf6U3IvNM_LwtAWQt3lOFhezaX4ZbykyM4Fl0V0BlB5aUjZs7Gjf0pCq8_T0pqGz2PardonKonhF3VF8ckI7Cxi7sR21TaB4koiQfbGBkRsKQBd-uXtBrs6-__52ng8FFXIvWdHnurSscjFAgIsuiJrLGuBPxVVkALRs7bTXVsoIqMKqKGNZWaZrF7wNvpJOspfkqGmb-JpQxmoGklHIiQYNexdVKCOLRSi1E8JlpNzNrPED2zgWvViYtOvQ0my1YUAbJmnDqIx82Y9Zbrk2DkqfosL2ksiTnRra1bUZ3M6AUTirpeNKBF7boIUraxWY84XXQdqMfER1G2TCaDDV5tquu878uLwwU6kBq8LHREY-D0I1KMR6O7xcgJlA8qyR5PFIElzVj7t3VmWGUNGZf4adkQ_7bhyJ6W9NbNdJBvaBvND8gIxkUuDxlM7Iq62h7ueGccnBG4qMqJEJjyZv3NPc_Elk41rgIjB5c_jX35JHFfpVSvU5Jkf9ah3fAVrr3fvkkn8B0V0_QQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title RNA-Seq reveals different responses to drought in Neotropical trees from savannas and seasonally dry forests
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34641780
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2583160725
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2581824084
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636593308
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8507309
https://doaj.org/article/195ba86b475d4fad85b1f7d3bc0c8d6a
Volume 21
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1LbxMxELb64MAF8e5CiQxC4oAWdtfPHBBKUKuC1AilRKq4WH5tqRTtttmNRP49Y2cTuqKquOSwHiebGX-ez_Z4BqG3xJa5yGieloUbptRamhriTWol48Y4k7F4Sex0wk9m9Ns5O99Bm3JHnQKbW5d2oZ7UbDH_8Pt69RkA_ykCXvKPTR5O69IQbJABP6Cp2EX74JlEAOop_XuqIGSkwzlMyGmoY725RHPrd_QcVczn_--sfcNt9UMqb_io44foQUcu8Wg9Gh6hHV89RvfGNRDA1RM0n05G6Zm_xiFrE_x7vCmO0sKTGCnrG9zW2MXKPS2-rPDE1-2ivgqGxOH4usHhOgpuNPDvSjdYVw6HXcZA5-cr6LnCQILhlZunaHZ89OPLSdoVW0gtJ1mbylyTwngHk583jpWUl0CNCio8ARKmSyOt1Jx7YBxaeO7zQhNZGme1swU3nDxDe1Vd-QOECSkJSHrGhxKsb40XLvfEZy6XhjGToHyjWWW7TOShIMZcxRWJ5GptDQXWUNEaSiTo_bbP1ToPx53S42CwrWTIoR0f1IsL1UFS5UNmtOSGCuZoqZ1kJi-FI8ZmVjquE_QmmFuFLBlVCMO50MumUV_PpmrEJfBY-DGWoHedUAkG0VZ3txpAEyGxVk_ysCcJMLb95s2oUhsUqIJJEjIAhubX2-bQM4TGVb5eRhlYI9JM0jtkOOEsbF3JBD1fD9StbgjlABWZJUj0hnBPef2W6vJXTEQuWXAQwxf_8W4v0f0igCvGAh2ivXax9K-AzrVmgHbFuRig_fHR5Pt0EDdFBhG38Dkd__wDZPdK0g
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bTtRAdIKLib4Y71ZRR6PxwTS0nUtnH4wBhYDAxnBJeBvmViQhLdBuzP6U3-g53XalMeGN186Ztjn3M3MuhHxgrkjzhKdxkflxzJ3jsWXBxk4Jaa23iWiLxPYmcuuI_zgWx0vkT18Lg2mVvU5sFbWvHJ6Rr2ZCMWyGlomvF5cxTo3C29V-hMacLXbC7DeEbPWX7e9A349Ztrlx-G0r7qYKxE6ypIlValhmgwcpD9aLgssCfICM54GBt2EKq5wyUgYwrSYPMqSZYaqw3hnvMmklg_feIcucQSgzIsvrG5Of-4t7i1zxcV-ao-RqneI9YoxpEAl4LjzOB-avnRLwvy24ZgyHiZrXLN_mQ_Kgc1np2pzHHpGlUD4md9crcCtnT8j5_mQtPgiXFHtBAS_TfuRKA0_a_NtQ06aivp0H1NCzkk5C1VxVF8geFC_Fa4pFLrQ24NWXpqam9BTPLjFIOJ_BzhkF1xp-uX5Kjm4F2c_IqKzK8IJQxgoGkEHIsQKecjbkPg0sJD5VVggbkbTHrHZdf3Mcs3Gu2zhHST2nhgZq6JYaOo_I58Wei3l3jxuh15FgC0jszN0-qK5OdSfoOh0La5S0PBeeF8YrYdMi98y6xCkvTUTeI7k19t4oMbnn1EzrWm8f7Os1qcA7ho-JiHzqgAogiHGmq5UATGC7rgHkygASlIMbLvdcpTvlVOt_ohSRd4tl3IkJd2Wopi0MRJ48UfwGGMmkwAMxFZHnc0Zd4IZxyUEakojkAxYeIG-4Up79atubK4FmZ_zy5l9_S-5tHe7t6t3tyc4rcj9DGWsTjVbIqLmahtfgKzb2TSeglJzctk74C56nfsI
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=RNA-Seq+reveals+different+responses+to+drought+in+Neotropical+trees+from+savannas+and+seasonally+dry+forests&rft.jtitle=BMC+plant+biology&rft.au=Sobreiro%2C+Mariane+B&rft.au=Collevatti%2C+Rosane+G&rft.au=Dos+Santos%2C+Yuri+L+A&rft.au=Bandeira%2C+Ludmila+F&rft.date=2021-10-12&rft.issn=1471-2229&rft.eissn=1471-2229&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=463&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12870-021-03244-7&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon