Association of whole grains intake and the risk of digestive tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database...
Saved in:
Published in | Nutrition journal Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 52 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
03.06.2020
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association.
Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models.
This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer.
This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models. This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer. This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Methods Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models. Results This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84–0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53–0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44–0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Methods Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models. Results This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. Keywords: Whole grains, Digestive tract cancer, Colorectal cancer, Gastric cancer, Esophagus cancer, Meta-analysis Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models. This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer. This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association.BACKGROUNDSeveral epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association.Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models.METHODSStudies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models.This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer.RESULTSThis meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84-0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer.This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer.CONCLUSIONThis meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. Abstract Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still controversial. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the association. Methods Studies published before March 2020 were searched in database and other sources. The risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) were pooled using fix or random-effects models. Results This meta-analysis included 34 articles reporting 35 studies, 18 studies of colorectal cancer, 11 studies of gastric cancer and 6 studies of esophagus cancer, involving 2,663,278 participants and 28,921 cases. Comparing the highest-intake participants with the lowest-intake participants for whole grains, we found that the intake of whole grains were inversely related to colorectal cancer (RR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.84–0.93, P < 0.001), gastric cancer (RR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53–0.79, P < 0.001), esophagus cancer (RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44–0.67, P < 0.001), respectively. However, subgroup analysis of colorectal cancer found no significant association in the case-control studies and studies of sample size < 500, and subgroup analysis of gastric cancer found no significant association in the cohort studies and studies of American population. No study significantly affected the findings in the sensitivity analysis. No publication bias was found in the studies for colorectal cancer and esophagus cancer except in the studies for gastric cancer. Conclusion This meta-analysis provides further evidence that whole grains intake was associated with a reduced risk of digestive tract cancer. Our result supports the dietary guidelines that increase whole grains intake to reduce the risk of digestive tract cancer. |
ArticleNumber | 52 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Guo, Yao Cui, Ling-Ling Wang, Xiao-Kai Tang, Yu-Jun Guan, Xiao-Xian Zhang, Xiao-Feng Fan, Jian-Ming |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Xiao-Feng surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Xiao-Feng – sequence: 2 givenname: Xiao-Kai surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Xiao-Kai – sequence: 3 givenname: Yu-Jun surname: Tang fullname: Tang, Yu-Jun – sequence: 4 givenname: Xiao-Xian surname: Guan fullname: Guan, Xiao-Xian – sequence: 5 givenname: Yao surname: Guo fullname: Guo, Yao – sequence: 6 givenname: Jian-Ming surname: Fan fullname: Fan, Jian-Ming – sequence: 7 givenname: Ling-Ling orcidid: 0000-0002-7795-3817 surname: Cui fullname: Cui, Ling-Ling |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493399$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkktv1DAUhSNURB_wB1ggS2xgkeJH4tgskEYVj5EqIfFYW459k_E0Ew-2Z0r_Pc5MC50KIeRFLOe7R_fec06Lo9GPUBTPCT4nRPA3kVDJmhJTXGJc17zkj4oTUjV1SYUkR_fux8VpjEuMqRCyeVIcM1pJxqQ8KdazGL1xOjk_It-h64UfAPVBuzEiNyZ9BUiPFqUFoODi1cRY10NMbgsoBW0SMno0EN4ijeJNTLDKYgYF2Dq43tWuIOlSj3q4iS4-LR53eojw7PZ7Vnz_8P7bxafy8vPH-cXssjSc4VTSrq2FBMpMV5lWEq0prVqDm5Ya0bRGGtZWHTGGA2BrGW8Iw11tKRei7WrNzor5Xtd6vVTr4FY63Civndo9-NArHXKjA6gKGOW04ZyTusKWaGJo21hGsK2NlTxrvdtrrTftCqyBMQ8-HIge_hndQvV-qxrakLrGWeDVrUDwPzZ5eWrlooFh0CP4TVTZDkEF5Vj-B4pzRzK7mtGXD9Cl34S854mavBcNJX-oXudZ3dj5ybVJVM3y1ExiLEWmzv9C5WNh5UzOXefy-0HB64OCzCT4mXq9iVHNv345ZF_c39_vxd3FMANiD5jgYwzQKePSLpO5CzcogtWUeLVPvMqJV7vEq8kb-qD0Tv0fRb8Ae4kBKg |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10654_023_01007_2 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1102673 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00394_024_03418_7 crossref_primary_10_1002_advs_202400665 crossref_primary_10_3390_su13126554 crossref_primary_10_21508_1027_4065_2020_65_4_162_169 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejphar_2023_175898 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpubh_2022_892468 crossref_primary_10_1093_advances_nmac087 crossref_primary_10_14302_issn_2379_7835_ijn_21_3908 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13010081 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13124514 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14091764 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu12123756 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13092982 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_2492488 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10552_023_01731_w crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14173482 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canep_2025_102771 crossref_primary_10_1108_BFJ_10_2021_1152 crossref_primary_10_1111_1541_4337_12728 crossref_primary_10_17116_profmed202427091111 crossref_primary_10_1080_01635581_2021_1909738 crossref_primary_10_1093_advances_nmaa172 crossref_primary_10_1002_cl2_1186 crossref_primary_10_1017_S000711452200085X crossref_primary_10_1097_CM9_0000000000003253 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_024_05176_w crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14040762 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2023_1132228 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu14224888 crossref_primary_10_1002_jpen_2259 crossref_primary_10_3390_nu13103583 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jand_2023_07_008 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2024_1510564 crossref_primary_10_1097_CEJ_0000000000000907 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12284_021_00543_3 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11947_023_03069_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605806 10.1017/S002966510800712X 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602543 10.1186/s12937-016-0139-z 10.1002/ijc.10341 10.1002/ijc.2910550203 10.1080/01635589409514322 10.1094/CFW-60-5-0224 10.1136/bmj.i3046 10.1016/j.jff.2014.11.022 10.3322/caac.21440 10.1007/s10552-013-0215-z 10.3322/caac.21492 10.1080/09637486.2019.1631264 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1353 10.1093/ajcn/75.1.137 10.1177/1534735415620010 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.08.002 10.1097/00008469-199206000-00004 10.1007/s00394-009-0778-3 10.1007/s10552-004-1809-2 10.3390/nu8010040 10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1107 10.1207/s15327914nc4802_4 10.1080/07315724.2012.10720437 10.1080/01635581.2018.1470647 10.1039/C1FO10165J 10.1007/s11095-008-9661-9 10.1007/s10654-013-9852-5 10.1093/nutrit/nuw003 10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.001 10.1017/S0007114519001454 10.1111/cas.12043 10.1016/j.jff.2013.02.004 10.3402/fnr.v58.22100 10.1136/bmj.i2716 10.2147/CLEP.S66677 10.1080/01635589809514647 10.1023/B:CACO.0000007983.16045.a1 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0700 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602435 10.1007/s00394-019-02032-2 10.1136/bmj.d6617 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29242 10.1080/01635581.2014.916321 10.1023/A:1018490212481 10.1002/ijc.32382 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6283 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1146 10.1007/BF00052138 10.1146/annurev.med.080708.082713 10.1002/ijc.2910470612 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000089 10.1007/s10654-015-0057-y 10.1159/000226642 10.1093/annonc/mdx171 10.1017/S0007114515001701 10.1002/fsn3.878 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.972 10.1017/S0029665115002104 10.1039/C7FO01908D 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601043 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7QP 7RQ 7RV 7TS 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK 8G5 ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ GUQSH K9. KB0 M0S M1P M2O MBDVC NAPCQ PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12937-020-00556-6 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Science (Gale In Context) ProQuest Central (Corporate) Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts Career & Technical Education Database Nursing & Allied Health Database Physical Education Index Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea Proquest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Research Library Research Library (Corporate) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Research Library Prep ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing Research Library (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central China Physical Education Index ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Research Library ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Career and Technical Education ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database AGRICOLA MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology Diet & Clinical Nutrition |
EISSN | 1475-2891 |
EndPage | 52 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_4e326276661540d1a1c2b7d310d5cd96 PMC7271550 A627390098 32493399 10_1186_s12937_020_00556_6 |
Genre | Meta-Analysis Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Systematic Review Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | United States |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States |
GroupedDBID | --- 04C 0R~ 123 29N 2WC 2XV 53G 5VS 7RQ 7RV 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8G5 A8Z AAFWJ AAHBH AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BKEYQ BMC BMSDO BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECGQY EIHBH EMB EMK EMOBN ESTFP ESX EX3 F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GUQSH GX1 HH5 HMCUK HYE IAO ICU IHR IHT INH INR IPT ISE ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M2O M48 M~E NAPCQ O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO QF4 QN7 RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SCM SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PMFND 3V. 7QP 7TS 7XB 8FK K9. MBDVC PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 7S9 L.6 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-2fb589e23cf4cb91aa224bc07b2c87bc9c3b4f1cc6ee0dd367130f5d2688bf5a3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1475-2891 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:31:34 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:54:08 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 04:22:28 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 10:00:43 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 21:51:18 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:35:10 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:33:21 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 04:23:30 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:57:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:09:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:07:17 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Digestive tract cancer Whole grains Gastric cancer Esophagus cancer Colorectal cancer Meta-analysis |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c630t-2fb589e23cf4cb91aa224bc07b2c87bc9c3b4f1cc6ee0dd367130f5d2688bf5a3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Undefined-4 |
ORCID | 0000-0002-7795-3817 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414758721?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 32493399 |
PQID | 2414758721 |
PQPubID | 42849 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4e326276661540d1a1c2b7d310d5cd96 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7271550 proquest_miscellaneous_2498282609 proquest_miscellaneous_2409639289 proquest_journals_2414758721 gale_infotracmisc_A627390098 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A627390098 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A627390098 pubmed_primary_32493399 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12937_020_00556_6 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12937_020_00556_6 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-06-03 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-06-03 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 06 year: 2020 text: 2020-06-03 day: 03 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | Nutrition journal |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Nutr J |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | AH Wu-Williams (556_CR40) 1990; 50 J Lissowska (556_CR20) 2004; 48 SS Abu Mweis (556_CR33) 2015; 24 C Kyro (556_CR32) 2013; 24 H Kim (556_CR67) 2009; 48 DL Roberts (556_CR65) 2010; 61 H Oh (556_CR57) 2019; 122 556_CR13 556_CR16 I Flight (556_CR8) 2006; 60 H Boeing (556_CR41) 1991; 47 LE Hansson (556_CR44) 1993; 55 556_CR10 556_CR54 HY Wu (556_CR12) 2015; 175 S Centonze (556_CR24) 1994; 21 ML McCullough (556_CR18) 2003; 14 M Wiseman (556_CR56) 2008; 67 CR Seo (556_CR63) 2015; 12 M McCarl (556_CR19) 2006; 15 N Makarem (556_CR60) 2016; 74 R Samra (556_CR68) 2007; 86 M Jessri (556_CR50) 2012; 31 RF Tayyem (556_CR34) 2016; 15 556_CR1 AR Vieira (556_CR6) 2017; 28 K Shikata (556_CR66) 2013; 104 DR Jacobs Jr (556_CR17) 1998; 30 W Jedrychowski (556_CR43) 1992; 1 CM Kasum (556_CR21) 2002; 99 AV Margulis (556_CR22) 2014; 6 CD Williams (556_CR29) 2009; 18 ML McCullough (556_CR47) 2001; 10 K Wu (556_CR26) 2004; 15 D Aune (556_CR14) 2013; 28 A Schatzkin (556_CR28) 2007; 85 C La Vecchia (556_CR39) 1988; 45 TT Fung (556_CR31) 2010; 92 R Egeberg (556_CR30) 2010; 103 556_CR35 556_CR36 556_CR37 SE Munoz (556_CR45) 1997; 6 CJ Seal (556_CR11) 2015; 74 HL Chen (556_CR49) 2002; 75 MY Song (556_CR4) 2015; 148 P Anand (556_CR3) 2008; 25 XS He (556_CR38) 2019; 145 V Sewram (556_CR51) 2014; 66 RK Sardana (556_CR55) 2018; 9 SC Larsson (556_CR27) 2005; 92 DL Luthria (556_CR64) 2015; 18 L Chatenoud (556_CR46) 1999; 70 G Skeie (556_CR52) 2016; 31 ML Slattery (556_CR25) 1997; 8 E Idehen (556_CR58) 2017; 25 F Levi (556_CR48) 2000; 54 YJ Xu (556_CR53) 2019; 7 NF Johnsen (556_CR15) 2015; 114 JM Jones (556_CR7) 2015; 60 F Islami (556_CR2) 2018; 68 M Vial (556_CR5) 2010; 182 F Shahidi (556_CR62) 2013; 5 N Makarem (556_CR61) 2018; 70 C Kyro (556_CR9) 2016; 353 H Boeing (556_CR42) 1991; 2 R Borneo (556_CR59) 2012; 3 RK Peters (556_CR23) 1989; 49 |
References_xml | – volume: 148 start-page: 1244 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR4 publication-title: Gastroenterology doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 – volume: 103 start-page: 730 year: 2010 ident: 556_CR30 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605806 – volume: 67 start-page: 253 year: 2008 ident: 556_CR56 publication-title: Proc Nutr Soc doi: 10.1017/S002966510800712X – volume: 49 start-page: 5459 year: 1989 ident: 556_CR23 publication-title: Cancer Res – volume: 92 start-page: 1803 year: 2005 ident: 556_CR27 publication-title: Br J Cancer doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602543 – ident: 556_CR35 doi: 10.1186/s12937-016-0139-z – volume: 99 start-page: 267 year: 2002 ident: 556_CR21 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.10341 – volume: 55 start-page: 181 year: 1993 ident: 556_CR44 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910550203 – volume: 21 start-page: 233 year: 1994 ident: 556_CR24 publication-title: Nutr Cancer doi: 10.1080/01635589409514322 – volume: 60 start-page: 224 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR7 publication-title: Cereal Foods World doi: 10.1094/CFW-60-5-0224 – volume: 353 start-page: i3046 year: 2016 ident: 556_CR9 publication-title: BMJ doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3046 – volume: 12 start-page: 208 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR63 publication-title: J Funct Foods doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.11.022 – volume: 68 start-page: 31 year: 2018 ident: 556_CR2 publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin doi: 10.3322/caac.21440 – volume: 24 start-page: 1363 year: 2013 ident: 556_CR32 publication-title: Cancer Causes Control doi: 10.1007/s10552-013-0215-z – volume: 50 start-page: 2569 year: 1990 ident: 556_CR40 publication-title: Cancer Res – ident: 556_CR1 doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 – ident: 556_CR54 doi: 10.1080/09637486.2019.1631264 – volume: 85 start-page: 1353 year: 2007 ident: 556_CR28 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1353 – volume: 75 start-page: 137 year: 2002 ident: 556_CR49 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1093/ajcn/75.1.137 – volume: 15 start-page: 318 year: 2016 ident: 556_CR34 publication-title: Integr Cancer Ther doi: 10.1177/1534735415620010 – volume: 25 start-page: 148 year: 2017 ident: 556_CR58 publication-title: J Food Drug Anal doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2016.08.002 – volume: 1 start-page: 297 year: 1992 ident: 556_CR43 publication-title: Eur J Cancer Prev doi: 10.1097/00008469-199206000-00004 – volume: 48 start-page: 170 year: 2009 ident: 556_CR67 publication-title: Eur J Nutr doi: 10.1007/s00394-009-0778-3 – volume: 15 start-page: 853 year: 2004 ident: 556_CR26 publication-title: Cancer Causes Control doi: 10.1007/s10552-004-1809-2 – ident: 556_CR36 doi: 10.3390/nu8010040 – volume: 70 start-page: 1107 year: 1999 ident: 556_CR46 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1093/ajcn/70.6.1107 – volume: 48 start-page: 149 year: 2004 ident: 556_CR20 publication-title: Nutr Cancer Int J doi: 10.1207/s15327914nc4802_4 – volume: 31 start-page: 338 year: 2012 ident: 556_CR50 publication-title: J Am Coll Nutr doi: 10.1080/07315724.2012.10720437 – volume: 70 start-page: 776 year: 2018 ident: 556_CR61 publication-title: Nutr Cancer Int J doi: 10.1080/01635581.2018.1470647 – volume: 3 start-page: 110 year: 2012 ident: 556_CR59 publication-title: Food Funct doi: 10.1039/C1FO10165J – volume: 25 start-page: 2097 year: 2008 ident: 556_CR3 publication-title: Pharm Res doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9661-9 – volume: 28 start-page: 845 year: 2013 ident: 556_CR14 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9852-5 – volume: 74 start-page: 353 year: 2016 ident: 556_CR60 publication-title: Nutr Rev doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw003 – volume: 18 start-page: 910 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR64 publication-title: J Funct Foods doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2015.01.001 – volume: 182 start-page: 1 year: 2010 ident: 556_CR5 publication-title: Recent Results Cancer Res – volume: 122 start-page: 605 year: 2019 ident: 556_CR57 publication-title: Br J Nutr doi: 10.1017/S0007114519001454 – volume: 104 start-page: 9 year: 2013 ident: 556_CR66 publication-title: Cancer Sci doi: 10.1111/cas.12043 – volume: 5 start-page: 570 year: 2013 ident: 556_CR62 publication-title: J Funct Foods doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2013.02.004 – ident: 556_CR10 doi: 10.3402/fnr.v58.22100 – ident: 556_CR13 doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2716 – volume: 6 start-page: 359 year: 2014 ident: 556_CR22 publication-title: Clin Epidemiol doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S66677 – volume: 30 start-page: 85 year: 1998 ident: 556_CR17 publication-title: Nutr Cancer doi: 10.1080/01635589809514647 – volume: 14 start-page: 959 year: 2003 ident: 556_CR18 publication-title: Cancer Causes Control doi: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000007983.16045.a1 – volume: 15 start-page: 892 year: 2006 ident: 556_CR19 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0700 – volume: 60 start-page: 1145 year: 2006 ident: 556_CR8 publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602435 – ident: 556_CR37 doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-02032-2 – volume: 10 start-page: 1201 year: 2001 ident: 556_CR47 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev – ident: 556_CR16 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6617 – volume: 92 start-page: 1429 year: 2010 ident: 556_CR31 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29242 – volume: 66 start-page: 791 year: 2014 ident: 556_CR51 publication-title: Nutr Cancer doi: 10.1080/01635581.2014.916321 – volume: 8 start-page: 575 year: 1997 ident: 556_CR25 publication-title: Cancer Causes Control doi: 10.1023/A:1018490212481 – volume: 145 start-page: 3040 year: 2019 ident: 556_CR38 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.32382 – volume: 175 start-page: 373 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR12 publication-title: JAMA Intern Med doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6283 – volume: 18 start-page: 1552 year: 2009 ident: 556_CR29 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1146 – volume: 2 start-page: 227 year: 1991 ident: 556_CR42 publication-title: Cancer Causes Control doi: 10.1007/BF00052138 – volume: 61 start-page: 301 year: 2010 ident: 556_CR65 publication-title: Annu Rev Med doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.080708.082713 – volume: 47 start-page: 858 year: 1991 ident: 556_CR41 publication-title: Int J Cancer doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910470612 – volume: 24 start-page: 313 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR33 publication-title: Eur J Cancer Prev doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000089 – volume: 6 start-page: 137 year: 1997 ident: 556_CR45 publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev – volume: 31 start-page: 405 year: 2016 ident: 556_CR52 publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol doi: 10.1007/s10654-015-0057-y – volume: 45 start-page: 364 year: 1988 ident: 556_CR39 publication-title: Oncology doi: 10.1159/000226642 – volume: 28 start-page: 1788 year: 2017 ident: 556_CR6 publication-title: Ann Oncol doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx171 – volume: 114 start-page: 608 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR15 publication-title: Br J Nutr doi: 10.1017/S0007114515001701 – volume: 7 start-page: 256 year: 2019 ident: 556_CR53 publication-title: Food Sci Nutr doi: 10.1002/fsn3.878 – volume: 86 start-page: 972 year: 2007 ident: 556_CR68 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1093/ajcn/86.4.972 – volume: 74 start-page: 313 year: 2015 ident: 556_CR11 publication-title: Proc Nutr Soc doi: 10.1017/S0029665115002104 – volume: 9 start-page: 1967 year: 2018 ident: 556_CR55 publication-title: Food Funct doi: 10.1039/C7FO01908D – volume: 54 start-page: 487 year: 2000 ident: 556_CR48 publication-title: Eur J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601043 |
SSID | ssj0028897 |
Score | 2.437481 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results are still... Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results... BACKGROUND: Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the results... Abstract Background Several epidemiological studies have investigated the association between whole grains intake and digestive tract cancer risk; however, the... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 52 |
SubjectTerms | Aircraft industry bias Cancer prevention Cancer research Cardiovascular disease case-control studies cohort studies Colorectal cancer Colorectal carcinoma colorectal neoplasms confidence interval Diet Dietary Guidelines digestive tract Digestive tract cancer Epidemiology Esophageal cancer esophageal neoplasms Esophagus Esophagus cancer Gastric cancer Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - epidemiology Gastrointestinal Neoplasms - prevention & control Gastrointestinal tract Grain Health aspects Health risk assessment Health risks Humans Meta-analysis Nutritional requirements Odds Ratio population Population studies relative risk Review Risk Factors Risk reduction Sensitivity analysis Statistical analysis statistical models stomach neoplasms Systematic review Type 2 diabetes whole grain foods Whole Grains Womens health |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQtDwCBRmE4ICsJnHi2NyWR1U49ABU6s3yK2VFm62arFD_fWccZ9kIqVy4xjNS5Bl7vi8ZfybktYOaY0LlGM9thQSFM1U2grWwyIWQwRkbuy2OxdFJ9fW0Pt266gt7wkZ54HHiDqoAAAO8oY4AuPCFKVxpGw-oxNfOqyi2DTVvIlOJakmpmumIjBQHPVa1hiFVQtEpwcSsDEW1_r_35K2iNG-Y3KpAh_fJvQQd6WJ85QfkTuh2yd6iA9p8cU3f0NjMGb-S75Ls0zIM8CzJfp7T40l1f49cboWErlr6G6_IpWd4V0RPl91gfgVqOk8BGlLsPEcbH_9Dwc5IBzxWRR0my9V7augfKWg6HoOJvhdhMMwkwZOH5OTw84-PRyxdvMCc4PnAytbWUoWSu7ZyVhXGQKG3Lm9s6WRjnXLcVm3hnAgh954LYLp5W_tSSGnb2vBHZKdbdeEJoQIiF7hXvm5MJStnSi5y2TjAPZUrhM9IMcVBu6RKjpdjnOvITqTQY-w0xE7H2GmRkXcbn8tRk-NW6w8Y3o0l6mnHB5BlOmWZ_leWZeQVJodGxYwOW3LOzLrv9Zfv3_QC_LhCXdaMvE1G7QqDYdIJB5gJFNmaWe7PLGFJu_nwlIM6bSm9BqhVAbkDxp6Rl5th9MQ2uS6s1mgDjBQQr1S32Shg2UBjwebxmNabuQF0rThA1ow0s4SfTd58pFv-jKLkgIOR7T79H7P9jNwt41oVLOf7ZGe4WofngP0G-yIu8xtP3VPz priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagXLggaHkECjIIwQFFTeLEDy5oeVSFQw9Apd4sx3a2K9pk2WSF-PfMeL2PCGmv8TiKPDOeb5zxN4S8thBzjC9tyrK6xASFpaoQPG3AyTmX3po6VFuc87OL8ttldRkP3PpYVrneE8NG7TqLZ-QnEGlKwLaQsHyY_06xaxT-XY0tNG6TO0hdhiVd4nKbcEmpxPqijOQnPcY2kWLChNRTPOWjYBQ4-__fmXdC07hscicOnd4n9yKApJOVxh-QW749JEeTFpLnm7_0DQ0lneGs_JAkn2d-gGeR_POanq-594_IfEcxtGvoH2yUS6fYMaKns3Ywvzw1raMAECnWn6OMC3-jYH-kA16uohZNZvGeGrolhKaryzBh7o0fTGoi7clDcnH65eenszS2X0gtZ9mQFk1dSeULZpvS1io3BsJ9bTNRF1aK2irL6rLJreXeZ84xDvlu1lSu4FLWTWXYI3LQdq1_QigXnHvmlKuEKWVpTcF4JoUF9FPanLuE5Gs9aBu5ybFFxrUOOYrkeqU7DbrTQXeaJ-TdZs58xcyxV_ojqncjiaza4UG3mOropLr0AGbBUgGzAJB1ucltUQsHCNhV1il4ySs0Do28GS0W5kzNsu_11x_f9QTmMYXsrAl5G4WaDpVh4j0HWAmk2hpJHo8kwbHteHhtgzpuLL3eukFCXm6GcSYWy7W-W6IM5KWAe6XaJ6Mg14ZkFmQer8x6szaAsRUD4JoQMTL40eKNR9rZVaAmBzSMOe_T_Z_-jNwtghfyNGPH5GBYLP1zwHZD_SI48D-BqEyW priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Association of whole grains intake and the risk of digestive tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32493399 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2414758721 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2409639289 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2498282609 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7271550 https://doaj.org/article/4e326276661540d1a1c2b7d310d5cd96 |
Volume | 19 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Nb9QwELX6ceGCoOUjUFYGITigQBIntoOE0La0KkisUGGl3izHdpYV22zZzQr675lxkmUjqkpccojHOXhm4veS8RtCnhvYc7RLTciiIkWCwsI8ETwsIck5l87owldbjPjpOP10np1vka7dUbuAy2upHfaTGi9mr3__vHoPCf_OJ7zkb5a4Z4kQiRBKSvGQb5Nd2JkEJurndP1XIZGyabaSiiwEohF3h2iufUZvo_J6_v--tTe2rX5J5cYedXKH3G7BJR020XCXbLlqj-wPKyDWF1f0BfXlnv47-h4JPkxdDfdaYdAZHXW6_PvkcsNpdF7SX9hEl06wm8SSTqta_3BUV5YCeKRYm4421v-pgncnrfHgFTUYTou3VNO_YtG0OSjj5164Woe6lUS5R8Ynx9-OTsO2NUNoOIvqMCmLTOYuYaZMTZHHWgMUKEwkisRIUZjcsCItY2O4c5G1jAMXjsrMJlzKosw0u092qnnlHhLKBeeO2dxmQqcyNTphPJLCADJKTcxtQOLOD8q0uuXYPmOmPH-RXDW-U-A75X2neEBeredcNqodN1ofonvXlqi47W_MFxPVJrBKHQBdiGLAMwBybaxjkxTCAjq2mbE5POQZBodCTY0Ki3YmerVcqo9fz9QQ5rEclVsD8rI1KufoDN2egYCVQBmunuVBzxKS3vSHuxhUXc4oCHmIbAmcPiBP18M4EwvpKjdfoQ1wVsDEMr_JJgceDkQXbB40Yb1eG8DfOQNQGxDRC_je4vVHqul3L1sOSBn58KP_8s1jcivxScnDiB2QnXqxck8ABtbFgGyLcwFXeRQPyO7h8ejL2cB_Uhn4rP8DJVdZsA |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELZKOcAFQcsjUMAgHgcUNYkTJ0FCaKFUu7TsAVppb8axnWVFmyybrKr-KX4jM06yuxFSb73G4yjKvL5Jxt8Q8kpBzpEmVC7zshALFOamQczdHJyc88QomdluizEfnoZfJ9Fki_ztzsJgW2UXE22g1qXCb-T7kGlCwLZQsHyc_3FxahT-Xe1GaDRmcWQuL6Bkqz6MDkC_r4Pg8MvJ56HbThVwFWde7QZ5FiWpCZjKQ5WlvpSQxTLlxVmgkjhTqWJZmPtKcWM8rRmHMs7LIx3wJMnySDK47w1yExKvhx4VT9YFXpKkcXcwJ-H7FebS2MUCDamuuMt7yc_OCPg_E2ykwn6b5kbeO7xL7rSAlQ4aC7tHtkyxQ3YHBRTr55f0DbUtpPbb_A5xDmamhmst2egZHXdc_7tkvmEItMzpBQ7mpVOcUFHRWVHL34bKQlMApBT73VFG279fEI9pjYe5qEITXbynkq4JqGlz-MbuPTe1dGVLs3KfnF6LYh6Q7aIszCNCecy5YTrVUSzDJFQyYNxLYgVoK1Q-1w7xOz0I1XKh40iOM2FrooSLRncCdCes7gR3yLvVnnnDBHKl9CdU70oSWbzthXIxFW1QEKEB8AyeARgJgLP2pa-CLNZgWTpSOoWbvETjEMjTUWAj0FQuq0qMfnwXA9jHUmSDdcjbVigvURmyPVcBbwKpvXqSez1JCCSqv9zZoGgDWSXWbueQF6tl3InNeYUplygDdTDg7CS9SiaF2h6KZ5B52Jj16t0Apk8ZAGWHxD2D7728_kox-2Wp0AF9Y439-OpHf05uDU--HYvj0fjoCbkdWI_krsf2yHa9WJqngCvr7Jl1Zkp-Xnf0-Ac51or5 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association+of+whole+grains+intake+and+the+risk+of+digestive+tract+cancer%3A+a+systematic+review+and+meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Nutrition+journal&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Xiao-Feng&rft.au=Wang%2C+Xiao-Kai&rft.au=Tang%2C+Yu-Jun&rft.au=Guan%2C+Xiao-Xian&rft.date=2020-06-03&rft.issn=1475-2891&rft.eissn=1475-2891&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12937-020-00556-6&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_s12937_020_00556_6 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-2891&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-2891&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-2891&client=summon |