Biosystematics studies on Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus (Poaceae: Triticeae)

Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC plant biology Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 57
Main Authors Tan, Lu, Huang, Qing-Xiang, Song, Yang, Wu, Dan-Dan, Cheng, Yi-Ran, Zhang, Chang-Bin, Sha, Li-Na, Fan, Xing, Kang, Hou-Yang, Wang, Yi, Zhang, Hai-Qin, Zhou, Yong-Hong
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 01.02.2022
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Analysis
Bayesian analysis
Biological systems
Biosystematics
Campeiostachys
Chimera - genetics
China
Chromosome banding
Chromosome pairing
Chromosomes
Classification
Elymus
Elymus - classification
Elymus - genetics
Elymus breviaristatus
Genetic aspects
Genetic Variation
genome
Genome, Plant
Genomes
Genomic in situ hybridization
Genomics
genus
Growth
Hybridization
Hybridization, Genetic
Hybrids
Identification and classification
In situ hybridization
Metaphase
Methods
Morphology
Perennials
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Pollen
Reproduction isolation
Species
Species Specificity
Sympatric populations
sympatry
China
Biosystematics
Campeiostachys
Chromosome pairing
Genomic in situ hybridization
Reproduction isolation
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
AbstractList BACKGROUND: Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. RESULTS: The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F₁ hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. CONCLUSIONS: In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species.BACKGROUNDElymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species.The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus.RESULTSThe high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus.In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.CONCLUSIONSIn all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) x E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F.sub.1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
Background Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. Results The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. Conclusions In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
Background Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. Results The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) x E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F.sub.1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. Conclusions In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan. Keywords: Campeiostachys, Chromosome pairing, Genomic in situ hybridization, Reproduction isolation, Biosystematics
Abstract Background Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition of E. sinosubmuticus has not been reported, and the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is still controversial. We performed artificial hybridization, genomic in situ hybridization, and phylogenetic analyses to clarify whether the two taxa were the same species. Results The high frequency bivalent (with an average of 20.62 bivalents per cell) at metaphase I of pollen mother cells of the artificial hybrids of E. breviaristatus (StYH) × E. sinosubmuticus was observed. It illustrated that E. sinosubmuticus was closely related to E. breviaristatus. Based on genomic in situ hybridization results, we confirmed that E. sinosubmuticus was an allohexaploid, and the genomic constitution was StYH. Phylogenetic analysis results also supported that this species contained St, Y, and H genomes. In their F1 hybrids, pollen activity was 53.90%, and the seed setting rate was 22.46%. Those indicated that the relationship between E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus is intersubspecific rather than interspecific, and it is reasonable to treated E. sinosubmuticus as the subspecies of E. breviaristatus. Conclusions In all, the genomic constitutions of E. sinosubmuticus and E. breviaristatus were StYH, and they are species in the genus Campeiostachys. Because E. breviaristatus was treated as Campeistachys breviaristata, Elymus sinosubmuticus should be renamed Campeiostachys breviaristata (Keng) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et C. R. Yang subsp. sinosubmuticus (S. L. Chen) Y. H. Zhou, H. Q. Zhang et L. Tan.
ArticleNumber 57
Audience Academic
Author Wu, Dan-Dan
Cheng, Yi-Ran
Wang, Yi
Zhang, Chang-Bin
Zhou, Yong-Hong
Huang, Qing-Xiang
Fan, Xing
Sha, Li-Na
Zhang, Hai-Qin
Tan, Lu
Kang, Hou-Yang
Song, Yang
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Lu
  surname: Tan
  fullname: Tan, Lu
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Qing-Xiang
  surname: Huang
  fullname: Huang, Qing-Xiang
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yang
  surname: Song
  fullname: Song, Yang
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Dan-Dan
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Dan-Dan
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Yi-Ran
  surname: Cheng
  fullname: Cheng, Yi-Ran
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Chang-Bin
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Chang-Bin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Li-Na
  surname: Sha
  fullname: Sha, Li-Na
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Xing
  surname: Fan
  fullname: Fan, Xing
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Hou-Yang
  surname: Kang
  fullname: Kang, Hou-Yang
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Yi
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Yi
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Hai-Qin
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Hai-Qin
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Yong-Hong
  surname: Zhou
  fullname: Zhou, Yong-Hong
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUk1v1DAUjFAR_YA_wAGtxKU9pPg7DgekUhVYqRIIyhXLsZ8Xr5K4tZOK_fc4u120WyGEfLD9PDP2G89xcdCHHoriJUbnGEvxJmEiK1QiQkpEGcPl6klxhFmFS0JIfbCzPiyOU1oihCvJ6mfFIeUYcYrkUfHjvQ9plQbo9OBNmqVhtB7SLPSzq3bVjWnWRLj3Ovo06CFvdW-3J8n3IY1NN2Zm3p5-CdqAhrezm-hzKS_PnhdPnW4TvHiYT4rvH65uLj-V158_zi8vrksjKBpKIowxWjSu5sAwJoJJ7gA5K4SltsaiIdRCDU7wBqSrkMDW1LVDyHLHQdKTYr7RtUEv1W30nY4rFbRX60KIC6VjflMLSjQA2TLsELFMMqqFcTRfCtYxa9da7zZat7k3sAb6Iep2T3T_pPc_1SLcKykRJ1JkgdMHgRjuRkiD6nwy0La6hzAmRQQVXIiK8P-AElazGkmUoa8fQZdhjH12dRJEnGHOdlALnXv1vQv5iWYSVReipqKiTE4tnv8FlYeFzpucMudzfY9wtkfImAF-DQs9pqTm377uY1_t-vfHuG3oMkBuACaGlCI4ZXwOlw-Tnb5VGKkp32qTb5U_S63zrVaZSh5Rt-r_IP0G3Fr8jQ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00412_023_00789_4
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_982844
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants11243533
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13258_024_01496_9
crossref_primary_10_1080_23802359_2023_2267786
crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2022_923967
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants13070919
crossref_primary_10_1093_plphys_kiae433
crossref_primary_10_3390_plants14010075
Cites_doi 10.1508/cytologia.1.263
10.17221/6127-CJGPB
10.1515/biolog-2016-0041
10.1186/s12870-015-0517-2
10.1139/b90-248
10.1111/boj.12469
10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.012
10.1360/aps040073
10.1006/mpev.2001.1011
10.1600/036364406777585865
10.1093/molbev/msn083
10.1007/978-1-4613-2429-4_9
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01665.x
10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.023
10.3417/2007103
10.1007/BF00982855
10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x
10.1007/s001220100563
10.1186/s12870-019-1779-x
10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00138.x
10.1007/BF02489475
10.11646/phytotaxa.201.2.1
10.1007/BF00982851
10.1139/g81-026
10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00600.x
10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6
10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
10.1002/j.1522-239X.1984.tb00022.x
10.1006/anbo.1994.1023
10.1139/b05-018
10.1270/jsbbs.59.685
10.1266/jjg.41.155
10.1016/j.bse.2016.11.011
10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00812.x
10.1093/genetics/166.2.987
10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00611.x
10.1105/tpc.109.066662
10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00106.x
10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.005
10.1007/s00606-005-0394-5
10.1139/gen-2016-0199
10.1023/A:1014868320552
10.1007/s12041-014-0335-6
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2022
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2022 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2022
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12870-022-03441-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials Local Electronic Collection Information
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
Agricultural Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)
Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic


Agricultural Science Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1471-2229
EndPage 57
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_6bee0221f02d4843a6cf3411edf4dde8
PMC8805286
A693673488
35105308
10_1186_s12870_022_03441_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
2XV
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X2
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
APEBS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAG
IAO
IEP
IGH
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
M7N
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c630t-26ccca6bf95e41126485fe0fd66d3d916b23de9ef65be8f7061dc99f00d5f5e83
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 1471-2229
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:27:23 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:18:01 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 05:08:05 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 15:09:53 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:22:53 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:05:42 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:36:32 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 04:19:54 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:28:25 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:52:31 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:49 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Biosystematics
Campeiostachys
Chromosome pairing
Genomic in situ hybridization
Reproduction isolation
Language English
License 2022. The Author(s).
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c630t-26ccca6bf95e41126485fe0fd66d3d916b23de9ef65be8f7061dc99f00d5f5e83
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630541540?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 35105308
PQID 2630541540
PQPubID 44650
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_6bee0221f02d4843a6cf3411edf4dde8
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8805286
proquest_miscellaneous_2636566725
proquest_miscellaneous_2624949080
proquest_journals_2630541540
gale_infotracmisc_A693673488
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A693673488
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A693673488
pubmed_primary_35105308
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12870_022_03441_y
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_022_03441_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2022-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2022
  text: 2022-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC plant biology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Plant Biol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References S Sakamoto (3441_CR26) 1982; 95
QW Dou (3441_CR30) 2011; 49
ME Barkworth (3441_CR5) 2009; 59
S Sakamoto (3441_CR36) 1966; 41
HQ Zhang (3441_CR11) 2007; 153
G Gao (3441_CR48) 2016; 71
G Petersen (3441_CR46) 2002; 22
JP Huelsenbeck (3441_CR60) 2001; 17
CR Yang (3441_CR35) 2016; 182
BR Lu (3441_CR51) 1992; 9
QL Liu (3441_CR37) 2006; 170
G Petersen (3441_CR43) 2006; 39
HQ Zhang (3441_CR54) 2006; 258
G Kimber (3441_CR53) 1981; 1981
LB Cai (3441_CR20) 1997; 17
SL Chen (3441_CR21) 2006
M Ørgaad (3441_CR27) 1994; 73
FP Han (3441_CR56) 2009; 21
PC Kuo (3441_CR19) 1987
C Yen (3441_CR2) 2013
BR Lu (3441_CR33) 1990; 12
3441_CR9
H Kihara (3441_CR25) 1930; 1
C Yen (3441_CR13) 1990; 68
3441_CR3
M Assadi (3441_CR17) 1995; 194
SX Huang (3441_CR45) 2002; 48
JJ Doyle (3441_CR55) 1990; 12
CR Yang (3441_CR32) 2017; 60
BR Baum (3441_CR6) 2011; 49
C Yen (3441_CR4) 2005; 83
RJ Mason-Gamer (3441_CR34) 2005; 41
JT Rauscher (3441_CR41) 2004; 166
C Yen (3441_CR8) 2013
ZZ Dong (3441_CR12) 2015; 15
YH Zhou (3441_CR23) 1999; 37
LN Sha (3441_CR44) 2010; 54
JD Thompson (3441_CR57) 1994; 22
C Yen (3441_CR50) 2008; 18
LA Johnson (3441_CR42) 2006; 31
3441_CR16
BR Baum (3441_CR10) 1995; 1995
XY Gu (3441_CR22) 2015; 24
HQ Yu (3441_CR29) 2010; 28
TL Zhang (3441_CR24) 2008; 28
D Posada (3441_CR58) 2008; 25
C Yen (3441_CR7) 2011
C Tang (3441_CR49) 2017; 70
RRC Wang (3441_CR52) 1992; 116
YL Keng (3441_CR18) 1959
X Fan (3441_CR38) 2013; 69
S Guindon (3441_CR59) 2009; 537
C Yen (3441_CR15) 2005; 43
CB Li (3441_CR28) 2001; 103
F Nasernakhaei (3441_CR47) 2015; 201
L Wang (3441_CR39) 2019; 19
DE Soltis (3441_CR40) 2003; 161
QX Wang (3441_CR31) 2014; 93
Á Löve (3441_CR1) 1984; 95
LB Cai (3441_CR14) 1997; 35
References_xml – volume: 1
  start-page: 263
  year: 1930
  ident: 3441_CR25
  publication-title: Cytologia
  doi: 10.1508/cytologia.1.263
– volume: 41
  start-page: 21
  year: 2005
  ident: 3441_CR34
  publication-title: Czech J Genet Plant
  doi: 10.17221/6127-CJGPB
– volume: 71
  start-page: 298
  year: 2016
  ident: 3441_CR48
  publication-title: Biologia
  doi: 10.1515/biolog-2016-0041
– volume: 15
  start-page: 179
  year: 2015
  ident: 3441_CR12
  publication-title: BMC Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0517-2
– volume: 68
  start-page: 1894
  year: 1990
  ident: 3441_CR13
  publication-title: Can J Bot
  doi: 10.1139/b90-248
– volume: 182
  start-page: 650
  year: 2016
  ident: 3441_CR35
  publication-title: Bot J Linn Soc
  doi: 10.1111/boj.12469
– volume: 69
  start-page: 919
  year: 2013
  ident: 3441_CR38
  publication-title: Mol Phylogenet Evol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.012
– volume: 43
  start-page: 82
  year: 2005
  ident: 3441_CR15
  publication-title: Acta Phytotax Sin
  doi: 10.1360/aps040073
– volume: 22
  start-page: 43
  year: 2002
  ident: 3441_CR46
  publication-title: Mol Phylogenet Evol
  doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1011
– volume: 31
  start-page: 349
  year: 2006
  ident: 3441_CR42
  publication-title: Syst Bot
  doi: 10.1600/036364406777585865
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1253
  year: 2008
  ident: 3441_CR58
  publication-title: Mol Biol Evol
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn083
– ident: 3441_CR3
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-2429-4_9
– volume: 170
  start-page: 411
  year: 2006
  ident: 3441_CR37
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01665.x
– volume: 39
  start-page: 70
  year: 2006
  ident: 3441_CR43
  publication-title: Mol Phylogenet Evol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.01.023
– volume: 18
  start-page: 405
  year: 2008
  ident: 3441_CR50
  publication-title: Novon J Bot Nomencl
  doi: 10.3417/2007103
– ident: 3441_CR9
– volume: 194
  start-page: 189
  year: 1995
  ident: 3441_CR17
  publication-title: Plant Syst Evol
  doi: 10.1007/BF00982855
– volume: 161
  start-page: 173
  year: 2003
  ident: 3441_CR40
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00948.x
– volume: 103
  start-page: 204
  year: 2001
  ident: 3441_CR28
  publication-title: Theor Appl Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s001220100563
– volume: 19
  start-page: 158
  year: 2019
  ident: 3441_CR39
  publication-title: BMC Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1186/s12870-019-1779-x
– volume: 35
  start-page: 148
  year: 1997
  ident: 3441_CR14
  publication-title: Koch from China Acta Phytotax Sin
– volume: 49
  start-page: 347
  year: 2011
  ident: 3441_CR30
  publication-title: J Syst Evol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2011.00138.x
– volume: 95
  start-page: 375
  year: 1982
  ident: 3441_CR26
  publication-title: Bot Magaz
  doi: 10.1007/BF02489475
– volume: 201
  start-page: 111
  year: 2015
  ident: 3441_CR47
  publication-title: Phytotaxa
  doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.201.2.1
– volume: 1995
  start-page: 123
  issue: 194
  year: 1995
  ident: 3441_CR10
  publication-title: Plant Syst Evol
  doi: 10.1007/BF00982851
– volume: 17
  start-page: 238
  year: 1997
  ident: 3441_CR20
  publication-title: Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin
– volume: 1981
  start-page: 235
  issue: 23
  year: 1981
  ident: 3441_CR53
  publication-title: Can J Genet Cytol
  doi: 10.1139/g81-026
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1333
  year: 2008
  ident: 3441_CR24
  publication-title: Acta Bot Boreal-Occident Sin
– volume: 153
  start-page: 213
  year: 2007
  ident: 3441_CR11
  publication-title: Bot J Linn Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00600.x
– volume: 537
  start-page: 113
  year: 2009
  ident: 3441_CR59
  publication-title: Methods Mol Biol
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6
– volume: 17
  start-page: 754
  year: 2001
  ident: 3441_CR60
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
– volume: 95
  start-page: 425
  year: 1984
  ident: 3441_CR1
  publication-title: Feddes Repert
  doi: 10.1002/j.1522-239X.1984.tb00022.x
– volume: 73
  start-page: 195
  year: 1994
  ident: 3441_CR27
  publication-title: Ann Bot
  doi: 10.1006/anbo.1994.1023
– volume: 83
  start-page: 413
  year: 2005
  ident: 3441_CR4
  publication-title: Can J Bot
  doi: 10.1139/b05-018
– volume: 37
  start-page: 425
  year: 1999
  ident: 3441_CR23
  publication-title: Acta Phytotax Sin
– volume: 59
  start-page: 685
  year: 2009
  ident: 3441_CR5
  publication-title: Breed Sci
  doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.59.685
– volume: 9
  start-page: 26
  year: 1992
  ident: 3441_CR51
  publication-title: Chin Bullet Bot
– volume-title: Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae
  year: 1987
  ident: 3441_CR19
– start-page: 342
  volume-title: Flora illustralis plantarum primarum sinicarum, Gramineae
  year: 1959
  ident: 3441_CR18
– volume-title: Biosystematics of Triticeae,
  year: 2011
  ident: 3441_CR7
– volume: 12
  start-page: 13
  year: 1990
  ident: 3441_CR55
  publication-title: Focus
– volume-title: Biosystematics of Triticeae,
  year: 2013
  ident: 3441_CR8
– volume: 41
  start-page: 155
  year: 1966
  ident: 3441_CR36
  publication-title: Jap J Genet.
  doi: 10.1266/jjg.41.155
– start-page: 386
  volume-title: Flora of China
  year: 2006
  ident: 3441_CR21
– volume: 70
  start-page: 168
  year: 2017
  ident: 3441_CR49
  publication-title: Bioch Syst Ecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2016.11.011
– volume: 116
  start-page: 133
  year: 1992
  ident: 3441_CR52
  publication-title: Hereditas
  doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5223.1992.tb00812.x
– volume: 24
  start-page: 141
  year: 2015
  ident: 3441_CR22
  publication-title: Acta Pratacul Sin
– ident: 3441_CR16
– volume: 166
  start-page: 987
  year: 2004
  ident: 3441_CR41
  publication-title: Genetics
  doi: 10.1093/genetics/166.2.987
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 3441_CR29
  publication-title: Nord J Bot
  doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00611.x
– volume: 21
  start-page: 1929
  year: 2009
  ident: 3441_CR56
  publication-title: Plant Cell
  doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.066662
– volume: 49
  start-page: 146
  year: 2011
  ident: 3441_CR6
  publication-title: J Syst Evol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00106.x
– volume: 22
  start-page: 4673
  year: 1994
  ident: 3441_CR57
  publication-title: Nucl Acids Res
  doi: 10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
– start-page: 1
  volume-title: Biosystematics of Triticeae
  year: 2013
  ident: 3441_CR2
– volume: 12
  start-page: 57
  year: 1990
  ident: 3441_CR33
  publication-title: Qinghai and Sichuan Acta Bot Yunnan
– volume: 54
  start-page: 327
  year: 2010
  ident: 3441_CR44
  publication-title: Mol Phylogenet Evol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.05.005
– volume: 258
  start-page: 129
  year: 2006
  ident: 3441_CR54
  publication-title: Plant Syst Evol
  doi: 10.1007/s00606-005-0394-5
– volume: 60
  start-page: 510
  year: 2017
  ident: 3441_CR32
  publication-title: Genome
  doi: 10.1139/gen-2016-0199
– volume: 48
  start-page: 805
  year: 2002
  ident: 3441_CR45
  publication-title: Plant Mol Biol
  doi: 10.1023/A:1014868320552
– volume: 93
  start-page: 199
  year: 2014
  ident: 3441_CR31
  publication-title: J Genet
  doi: 10.1007/s12041-014-0335-6
SSID ssj0017849
Score 2.3812554
Snippet Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome composition...
Background Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome...
BACKGROUND: Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The genome...
Abstract Background Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus are perennial herbs, not only morphologically similar but also sympatric distribution. The...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 57
SubjectTerms Analysis
Bayesian analysis
Biological systems
Biosystematics
Campeiostachys
Chimera - genetics
China
Chromosome banding
Chromosome pairing
Chromosomes
Classification
Elymus
Elymus - classification
Elymus - genetics
Elymus breviaristatus
Genetic aspects
Genetic Variation
genome
Genome, Plant
Genomes
Genomic in situ hybridization
Genomics
genus
Growth
Hybridization
Hybridization, Genetic
Hybrids
Identification and classification
In situ hybridization
Metaphase
Methods
Morphology
Perennials
Phylogenetics
Phylogeny
Pollen
Reproduction isolation
Species
Species Specificity
Sympatric populations
sympatry
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQxYEL4k2goICQAKGoiV-xuXVRq8IBIWilnrAcP2ClklTN7mH_PTNOsmyEVC7cNuuJNjseez7Hn78h5JVTgjPcGqRWRligNLrQpbcFrZVwlDFZu8S2-CxPzvinc3G-U-oLOWGDPPDguAPZhAB5pool9VxxZqWLMPNWwUcOQzMd84WcNy2mxv2DWnE9HZFR8qCvcD-vQOY6StxVxWaWhpJa_99z8k5SmhMmdzLQ8R1ye4SO-eHwyHfJjdDeIzcXHcC7zX3yfbHs_sgy93k_EATzrs2PLja_1n3eIKMXaw4CvoRL2_qppV-2XQ8_jS-24fLNl866YMP7_DQVQoCPbx-Qs-Oj0w8nxVg8oXCSlauCSgedI5uoReB4TogrEUMZvZSeeQCFDWU-6BClaIKKNeR177SOZelFFEGxh2Sv7drwmOSCBVTVs6WTltvGaQAd0dla6cgsY3VGqsmXxo3K4ljg4sKkFYaSZvC_Af-b5H-zyci77T2Xg67GtdYL7KKtJWpipy8gUswYKeZfkZKRl9jBBlUvWqTV_LDrvjcfv301h1JDVDKYzDLyejSKHfwHZ8dTCuAJFMqaWe7PLGFYunnzFEdmnBZ6Q6FrBEAmXmbkxbYZ70SqWxu6NdpQVAwCJH-dDUMcXlORkUdDaG59wxAysxIeoJ4F7cx585Z2-TMJiyusb6Hkk__h7afkFk3jDZk_-2RvdbUOzwC_rZrnaaj-BtyVQs4
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA_n6YMv4rfVU6oIKtKzbT6aCCK3cscpKKK3cE-GNB_nwtrqdhfsf-9Mt9274rFv282EtpOZzC_N5DeEPLeSM4pbg7kRARYopUpU6kySF5LbnFJR2C7b4os4nrJPp_x0hwzljnoFNpcu7bCe1HQx3__7p30PDv-uc3gp3jQZ7tYlmJeOBHZZ0l4hVyEyFVjR4DM731UoJFPDwZlL-42CU8fh__9MfSFUjdMoL8Slo5vkRg8o44O1BdwiO766Ta5NagB97R3yYzKrz8mam7hZpw3GdRUfzttfqyYuMc8XKxEC6oRLU7mhpZlVdQO3xs_dcPnya22sN_5tfNKVR4Cfr-6S6dHhyYfjpC-pkFhB02WSCwtDJsqguGd4eohJHnwanBCOOoCKZU6dVz4IXnoZCoj2zioV0tTxwL2k98huVVf-AYk59ci1Z1IrDDOlVQBFgjWFVIEaSouIZIMute35xrHsxVx36w4p9Fr_GvSvO_3rNiKvN31-r9k2tkpPcIg2ksiU3f1RL85073halN5DnyykuWOSUSNsgMideRcYTO0yIs9wgDVyYVSYbHNmVk2jP37_pg-EAlulMMVF5EUvFGp4B2v6swugCaTPGknujSTBWe24ebAjPdi6zmFoOAAplkbk6aYZe2ICXOXrFcrkyCME-H6bDEV0XuQ8IvfXprnRDUUgTVN4gGJktCPljVuq2c-Oblxi1QspHm5_9Efket55Emb67JHd5WLlHwNeW5ZPOif8B6mxPOk
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Biosystematics studies on Elymus breviaristatus and Elymus sinosubmuticus (Poaceae: Triticeae)
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35105308
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2630541540
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2624949080
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2636566725
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8805286
https://doaj.org/article/6bee0221f02d4843a6cf3411edf4dde8
Volume 22
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELag5cAF8W6grAJCAoSiJrHjOFxQF21VkKiqpZVWHLAcP8pKJSnN7mH_PTPOo42Q9hIl8VhxxuOZsT3-hpC3WmSM4tZgqriDCUpZREVsVJTmItMppTzXPtrihB-fs2-LbNEtuDVdWGWvE72iNrXGNfKDlINkgrVh8eervxFmjcLd1S6Fxl2yi9BlKNX5YphwJblgRX9QRvCDJsFdvQjj1xHoLok2I2PkMfv_18y3TNM4bPKWHTp6SB50DmR42Pb4I3LHVo_JvWkNTt7mCfk1XdY34MxN2LRhgmFdhbPLzZ91E5YY14uZB8HLhEdVmb6kWVZ1A5_G5W14fH9aK22V_RSe-XQIcPvhKTk_mp19OY66FAqRBn6topRr6CJeuiKzDE8LMZE5GzvDuaEGXMMypcYW1vGstMLlYN2NLgoXxyZzmRX0Gdmp6srukTCjFrH1VKy5YqrUBbgeTqtcFI4qSvOAJD0vpe7wxTHNxaX08wzBZct_CfyXnv9yE5CPQ52rFl1jK_UUu2igRGRs_6K-vpDdQJO8tBbqJC5ODROMKq4dWOrEGsdAlYuAvMEOloh9UWFwzYVaN438-mMuD3kBsklBpQXkXUfkavgHrbqzCsAJhMsaUe6PKGFw6nFxL0eyUw6NvBHlgLweirEmBrxVtl4jTYq4QeDPb6Oh6I3naRaQ561oDryh6DjTGBqQj4R2xLxxSbX87eHFBWa5EPzF9qa_JPdTP5Iwsmef7Kyu1_YV-GercuIH4YTsTmcnp_OJX-WA63cm4Dqf_vwHzYQ98A
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3rb9MwELfGQGJfEO8FBgQEAoSiJXbiOEgIrbCpZWNC0En9hHH8GJVGMpZWqP8UfyN3eXSLkPpt35L4nLrn8z3i8-8Iea5FEjPcGqSKOwhQ8izIQqMCmopEU8Z4qutsi0M-PIo_TZLJGvnbnYXBtMpOJ9aK2pQav5FvUw6SCdYmDt-f_g6wahTurnYlNBqx2LeLPxCyVe9GH2F-X1C6tzv-MAzaqgKBhlfMAso1jJrnLktsjAdoYpE4GzrDuWEGvKWcMmMz63iSW-FSMHhGZ5kLQ5O4xAoG771CroLhDTHYSyfLAC9KRZx1B3ME364i3EUMMF8egfWiYNEzfnWNgP8twQVT2E_TvGD39m6SG63D6u80EnaLrNniNrk2KMGpXNwh3wfT8hwMuvKrJi3RLwt_92Txa175OeYRY6VD8GrhVhWma6mmRVnBT-PndLh99aVU2ir71h_X5Rfg8vVdcnQpzL1H1ouysJvET5hFLD8Vaq5ilesMOO60SkXmmGIs9UjU8VLqFs8cy2qcyDquEVw2_JfAf1nzXy488mbZ57RB81hJPcApWlIiEnf9oDw7lu3Cljy3FvpELqQmFjFTXDvwDCJrXAymQ3jkGU6wRKyNApN5jtW8quTo21e5wzNYCwxUqEdetkSuhP-gVXs2AjiB8Fw9yq0eJSgD3W_u5Ei2yqiS50vHI0-XzdgTE-wKW86RhiJOEcQPq2gYev8pTTxyvxHNJW8YOuoshAGkPaHtMa_fUkx_1nDmAqtqCP5g9dCfkOvD8ecDeTA63H9INmi9qjCraIusz87m9hH4hrP8cb0gffLjsjXAPxjFd2c
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biosystematics+studies+on+Elymus+breviaristatus+and+Elymus+sinosubmuticus+%28Poaceae%3A+Triticeae%29&rft.jtitle=BMC+plant+biology&rft.au=Tan%2C+Lu&rft.au=Qing-Xiang%2C+Huang&rft.au=Yang%2C+Song&rft.au=Dan-Dan+Wu&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2229&rft.volume=22&rft.spage=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12870-022-03441-y
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon