Telehealth challenges during COVID-19 as reported by primary healthcare physicians in Quebec and Massachusetts

• Published in: BMC family practice Vol. 22; no. 1; pp. 192 - 13
• Main Authors: Breton, Mylaine, Sullivan, Erin E., Deville-Stoetzel, Nadia, McKinstry, Danielle, DePuccio, Matthew, Sriharan, Abi, Deslauriers, Véronique, Dong, Anson, McAlearney, Ann Scheck
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 26.09.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Access to information; Beliefs, opinions and attitudes; Canada; Collaboration; Control; Coronaviruses; COVID-19; E-health; Epidemics; Family physicians; Health care industry; Health services; Humans; Interviews; Low income groups; Massachusetts; Pandemics; Perceptions; Physicians; Physicians, Primary Care; Practice; Primary Health Care; Primary healthcare; Quebec; Safety and security measures; SARS-CoV-2; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Technology application; Telehealth; Telemedicine; Canada; Quebec; Massachusetts; United States > US; Quebec Canada; COVID-19; Telehealth; Primary healthcare; Family physicians
• DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01543-4
• ISSN: 1471-2296

The COVID-19 pandemic has driven primary healthcare (PHC) providers to use telehealth as an alternative to traditional face-to-face consultations. Providing telehealth that meets the needs of patients in a pandemic has presented many challenges for PHC providers. The aim of this study was to describe the positive and negative implications of using telehealth in one Canadian (Quebec) and one American (Massachusetts) PHC setting during the COVID-19 pandemic as reported by physicians. We conducted 42 individual semi-structured video interviews with physicians in Quebec (N = 20) and Massachusetts (N = 22) in 2020. Topics covered included their practice history, changes brought by the COVID-19 pandemic, and the advantages and challenges of telehealth. An inductive and deductive thematic analysis was carried out to identify implications of delivering care via telehealth. Four key themes were identified, each with positive and negative implications: 1) access for patients; 2) efficiency of care delivery; 3) professional impacts; and 4) relational dimensions of care. For patients' access, positive implications referred to increased availability of services; negative implications involved barriers due to difficulties with access to and use of technologies. Positive implications for efficiency were related to improved follow-up care; negative implications involved difficulties in diagnosing in the absence of direct physical examination and non-verbal cues. For professional impacts, positive implications were related to flexibility (teleworking, more availability for patients) and reimbursement, while negative implications were related to technological limitations experienced by both patients and practitioners. For relational dimensions, positive implications included improved communication, as patients were more at ease at home, and the possibility of gathering information from what could be seen of the patient's environment; negative implications were related to concerns around maintaining the therapeutic relationship and changes in patients' engagement and expectations. Ensuring that health services provision meets patients' needs at all times calls for flexibility in care delivery modalities, role shifting to adapt to virtual care, sustained relationships with patients, and interprofessional collaboration. To succeed, these efforts require guidelines and training, as well as careful attention to technological barriers and interpersonal relationship needs.