Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study
To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [ Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Men with newly diag...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC cancer Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 723 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
05.08.2020
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1471-2407 1471-2407 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-020-07192-7 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [
Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa).
Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [
Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board.
Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence.
PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. |
---|---|
AbstractList | To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [.sup.68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [.sup.68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. Results Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence. Conclusions PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa).BACKGROUNDTo evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa).Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board.METHODSMen with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board.Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence.RESULTSSixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence.PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa.CONCLUSIONSPSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [ Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [ Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence. PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. Results Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence. Conclusions PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [.sup.68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT) compared with conventional imaging on staging and clinical management of men evaluated for primary prostate cancer (PCa). Methods Men with newly diagnosed biopsy-proven PCa who had been staged with a conventional staging protocol including bone scintigraphy (BS) and additionally underwent [.sup.68Ga]PSMA PET/CT, were evaluated retrospectively. Imaging findings from BS, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or CT were categorized regarding locoregional nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M) status as negative, positive or equivocal before and after addition of the information of PET/CT. Also, the imaging-based level of confidence (LoC) in correct assessment of N and M status was scored. Impact of PET/CT on clinical management was evaluated by the percentage of treatment category changes after PET/CT as determined in the multidisciplinary tumour board. Results Sixty-four men with intermediate and high-risk PCa were evaluated. With additional information of PET/CT, N status was upstaged in 23%, and downstaged in 9%. M status was upstaged in 13%, and downstaged in 23%. A net increase in LoC of 20% was noted, mainly regarding M status. Treatment category changed from palliative to curative in 9%, and from curative to palliative in 3%. An undecided treatment plan changed to curative in 14%, as well as to palliative in another 9%. In total, a 36% treatment category change was noted. High negative predictive value of PET/CT for M status was indicated by 27 patients that underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and reached postoperative biochemical disease-free status or had a likely other site of disease recurrence. Conclusions PSMA PET/CT can cause considerable changes in N and M staging, as well as in management compared to conventional staging. Findings of this study support the replacement of BS and CT by PSMA PET/CT in staging primary PCa. Keywords: PSMA, Prostate, Staging, Management, Impact |
ArticleNumber | 723 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Donswijk, Maarten L. van Leeuwen, Pim J. Cheung, Zing Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. van der Poel, Henk G. Stokkel, Marcel P. M. Vegt, Erik |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Maarten L. orcidid: 0000-0003-2028-9713 surname: Donswijk fullname: Donswijk, Maarten L. – sequence: 2 givenname: Pim J. surname: van Leeuwen fullname: van Leeuwen, Pim J. – sequence: 3 givenname: Erik surname: Vegt fullname: Vegt, Erik – sequence: 4 givenname: Zing surname: Cheung fullname: Cheung, Zing – sequence: 5 givenname: Stijn W. T. P. J. surname: Heijmink fullname: Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. – sequence: 6 givenname: Henk G. surname: van der Poel fullname: van der Poel, Henk G. – sequence: 7 givenname: Marcel P. M. surname: Stokkel fullname: Stokkel, Marcel P. M. |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758168$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9k9tu1DAQhiNURA_wAlwgS0gILtL6kI1tLpBWqwKViqhoubYcZ7J1lbWX2KnoY_DGTLpt1a0QimQ7k___HI9n9oudEAMUxWtGDxlT9VFiXKlZSTktqWSal_JZsccqyUpeUbnzaL1b7Kd0RSmTiqoXxa7gcqZYrfaKP4veB-9sT_xqbV0msSNn59_m5Oz44mhxQXwg68Gv7HCDc0zZZiDOBgcDcREdA7QkR1yHawjZx4CkEFscbWhJ69ERMsFx6cPyI7FkgIycNbjsr4EkjPZIRC8SUx7bm5fF8872CV7dzQfFz8_HF4uv5en3LyeL-Wnpaq5yabUCoXWrQc1qprXuGDSCzkCIWsL0xm0Fkjop6q51uqqlFh3wBjSIqpPioDjZcNtor8zdIU203twG4rA0dsje9WAaJptKVLJtdFNxSTWjjkNTg9K048CR9WnDWo_NCtrpOIPtt6DbX4K_NMt4bWRFdSU0At7fAYb4a4SUzconB31vA8QxGV4JpphgtELp2yfSqzgOmPdb1YxzLVH5oFpaPIAPXcR93QQ18xpZis_UtO3hP1T4tLDyeKfQeYxvGT5sGVCT4Xde2jElc3L-Y1v77pH2EmyfL1Psx6lK0rbwzePsPaTtvkpRoDYCh6WTBuiM81iJyMHf9b1h1EwNYTYNYbAhzG1DmOmW-RPrPf0_pr8lzQui |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1038_s41585_022_00670_6 crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13153726 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euo_2024_11_006 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2023_09_053 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics14171964 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12149_023_01859_4 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00261_024_04433_2 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40336_023_00577_1 crossref_primary_10_1002_ijc_33568 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_eururo_2022_03_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_0284186X_2022_2129442 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40644_024_00742_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1200676 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12105_021_01376_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s41973_025_00291_7 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_122_265205 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_esmoop_2024_103448 crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph20010537 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics12112594 crossref_primary_10_5114_pjr_2023_130196 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_122_264394 crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_jmedchem_3c01310 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euf_2021_01_016 crossref_primary_10_2967_jnumed_124_268441 crossref_primary_10_3390_diagnostics11020186 crossref_primary_10_1097_RLU_0000000000004566 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13629_022_00375_w crossref_primary_10_12677_ACM_2024_142620 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_canlet_2022_215883 crossref_primary_10_1097_MNM_0000000000001771 crossref_primary_10_1200_JCO_22_00208 crossref_primary_10_1245_s10434_023_13365_y crossref_primary_10_33590_10059664 crossref_primary_10_3390_biomedicines11010038 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11307_024_01900_6 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_mednuc_2021_06_136 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2021_11_007 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_021_05655_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00259_021_05424_x crossref_primary_10_1002_aisy_202300192 crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_1066926 |
Cites_doi | 10.1007/s00345-017-2096-3 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.051 10.1111/bju.13397 10.1186/s40644-020-0290-9 10.2967/jnumed.116.173492 10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6 10.2967/jnumed.118.209387 10.1007/s00259-017-3746-9 10.1007/s00330-017-4994-6 10.1007/s00259-016-3435-0 10.7150/thno.18421 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.024 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956585 10.1007/s00345-015-1669-2 10.2967/jnumed.117.197160 10.1007/s00345-018-2182-1 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.009 10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7 10.2967/jnumed.118.223099 10.2967/jnumed.117.198119 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2020 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2020 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM ISR 3V. 7TO 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH H94 K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12885-020-07192-7 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Science in Context ProQuest Central (Corporate) Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition) PML(ProQuest Medical Library) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1471-2407 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_b17b4347db9b4270910c2eb6e890f2e2 PMC7409439 A631882589 32758168 10_1186_s12885_020_07192_7 |
Genre | Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL AAYXX ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7TO 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO H94 K9. PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c628t-a98e399d9e8561999f1eb305e3367e9f1e2a4e70c736fdc946793fe2be9e34f73 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1471-2407 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:29:41 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 13:41:07 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 19:56:23 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 08:06:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:55:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:11:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jun 27 03:35:09 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:21:45 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:58:16 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:28:56 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:04 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Impact PSMA Management Staging Prostate |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c628t-a98e399d9e8561999f1eb305e3367e9f1e2a4e70c736fdc946793fe2be9e34f73 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0000-0003-2028-9713 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2435229781?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 32758168 |
PQID | 2435229781 |
PQPubID | 44074 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b17b4347db9b4270910c2eb6e890f2e2 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_7409439 proquest_miscellaneous_2431813104 proquest_journals_2435229781 gale_infotracmisc_A631882589 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A631882589 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A631882589 gale_healthsolutions_A631882589 pubmed_primary_32758168 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12885_020_07192_7 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_020_07192_7 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2020-08-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2020-08-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 08 year: 2020 text: 2020-08-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC cancer |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Cancer |
PublicationYear | 2020 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | T Lengana (7192_CR17) 2018; 16 MS Hofman (7192_CR19) 2020; 395 LJ Petersen (7192_CR12) 2020; 20 J Corfield (7192_CR7) 2018; 36 LG Gordon (7192_CR1) 2018; 36 K Schiller (7192_CR20) 2017; 44 GJ Jager (7192_CR14) 1996; 167 A Afshar-Oromieh (7192_CR6) 2015; 42 M Eiber (7192_CR16) 2018; 59 N Mottet (7192_CR2) 2019 PJ van Leeuwen (7192_CR11) 2016; 117 I Rauscher (7192_CR15) 2016; 57 T Pyka (7192_CR4) 2016; 43 L Budaus (7192_CR9) 2016; 69 JC Janssen (7192_CR3) 2018; 28 J Calais (7192_CR21) 2018; 59 PJ Roach (7192_CR18) 2018; 59 A Herlemann (7192_CR8) 2016; 70 T Maurer (7192_CR10) 2016; 195 CA Jilg (7192_CR13) 2017; 7 WP Fendler (7192_CR23) 2017; 44 M Wondergem (7192_CR5) 2018; 36 L Emmett (7192_CR24) 2019; 60 D Gabriele (7192_CR22) 2016; 34 |
References_xml | – volume: 36 start-page: 27 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR5 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2096-3 – volume: 70 start-page: 553 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR8 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.051 – volume: 117 start-page: 732 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR11 publication-title: BJU Int doi: 10.1111/bju.13397 – volume: 20 start-page: 10 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 7192_CR12 publication-title: Cancer Imaging doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-0290-9 – volume: 57 start-page: 1713 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR15 publication-title: J Nucl Med doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.173492 – volume: 42 start-page: 197 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 7192_CR6 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-014-2949-6 – volume: 59 start-page: 1714 issue: 11 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR21 publication-title: J Nucl Med doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.209387 – volume: 44 start-page: 1656 issue: 10 year: 2017 ident: 7192_CR20 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3746-9 – volume-title: Prostate cancer year: 2019 ident: 7192_CR2 – volume: 28 start-page: 610 issue: 2 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR3 publication-title: Eur Radiol doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4994-6 – volume: 43 start-page: 2114 issue: 12 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR4 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3435-0 – volume: 7 start-page: 1770 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 7192_CR13 publication-title: Theranostics. doi: 10.7150/thno.18421 – volume: 36 start-page: 91 e7 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR1 publication-title: Urol Oncol doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2017.10.024 – volume: 167 start-page: 1503 issue: 6 year: 1996 ident: 7192_CR14 publication-title: AJR Am J Roentgenol doi: 10.2214/ajr.167.6.8956585 – volume: 34 start-page: 517 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR22 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1669-2 – volume: 59 start-page: 82 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR18 publication-title: J Nucl Med doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.197160 – volume: 36 start-page: 519 issue: 4 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR7 publication-title: World J Urol doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2182-1 – volume: 16 start-page: 392 issue: 5 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR17 publication-title: Clin Genitourin Cancer doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.009 – volume: 44 start-page: 1014 issue: 6 year: 2017 ident: 7192_CR23 publication-title: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3670-z – volume: 195 start-page: 1436 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR10 publication-title: J Urol doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.025 – volume: 395 start-page: 1208 issue: 10231 year: 2020 ident: 7192_CR19 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30314-7 – volume: 60 start-page: 950 issue: 7 year: 2019 ident: 7192_CR24 publication-title: J Nucl Med doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.223099 – volume: 59 start-page: 469 issue: 3 year: 2018 ident: 7192_CR16 publication-title: J Nucl Med doi: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198119 – volume: 69 start-page: 393 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: 7192_CR9 publication-title: Eur Urol doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.010 |
SSID | ssj0017808 |
Score | 2.465615 |
Snippet | To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [
Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT)... Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [.sup.68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed... To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [.sup.68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography... Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed... To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray computed tomography (CT)... Abstract Background To evaluate the impact of Gallium-68 [68Ga] labeled prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/X-ray... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source |
StartPage | 723 |
SubjectTerms | Abdomen Aged Aged, 80 and over Androgens Antigens, Surface Biopsy Bisphosphonates Bone Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Bone Neoplasms - secondary Cancer metastasis Cancer research Cancer surgery Cancer therapies CAT scans Comparative analysis Computed tomography Drug dosages Femoral Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Femoral Neoplasms - secondary Gallium Gallium Radioisotopes Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II Humans Impact Lymphatic Metastasis - diagnostic imaging Lymphatic system Magnetic resonance imaging Male Management Metastases Metastasis Middle Aged Neoplasm Grading Neoplasm Staging - methods Nuclear medicine Palliative Care Patients Physicians Positron emission tomography Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography - methods Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery PSMA Recurrence (Disease) Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robots Scintigraphy Staging Tumors |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQD4gLojwDBQxC4oCiTRyvH9yWqlVBKqroVurNchynVFolKJv9If3HzDhOtBESXLhktfEk2p2ZjL-JZz4T8kEqVzifL1OrS57yimeptUuVVriIZyH9sT6wfX4XZ1f82_Xyem-rL6wJG-iBB8UtylyWvOCyKuFmTOL05pgvhVc6q5kP0RdOjslUXD-QKlNji4wSiy1EYYWdyBk27GjAlLNpKLD1_xmT9yalecHk3gx0-og8jNCRroaffEju-eYxuX8eF8efkLvI8bmhQ-sjbWt6cXm-ohcn68Xxmt429NfALQGfbegkog6N3tGxEp32Ld2vQ6dNW8HRNhWtEGg2PYUj7mv0mVra-b5rx1ZNii8dNnBHJPnsaKCtfUquTk_Wx2dp3HEhdYKpHgymPCCWSnsFuAqwY51Dsp0tfVEI6fEbs9zLzMlC1JXTEGV1UXtWeu0LXsviGTlo2sa_INTWSjqR21pDylYqpp3SvGbaipI7wCAJyUcDGBfpyHFXjI0JaYkSZjCaAaOZYDQjE_JpuiYq7K_SX9CukyQSaYcT4F4mupf5l3sl5C16hRm6UqdwYFYCgiFk10on5H2QQDKNBqt1buxuuzVfL3_MhD5GobqFf-lsbH4AXSH_1kzyaCYJT7ubD4_uaWK02RrGEUYje1lC3k3DeCVW0DW-3QUZAHMA5nlCng_ePGmmYJA15kIlRM78fKa6-Uhz-zNwkUt8P1Dol_9D16_IAxYeUZVmyyNy0Hc7_xogX1--CU_3b0sGUgQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection (Proquest) dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fa9swEBZbB2MvY7_rtdu0MdjDMLFlxZL2MrLS0g06yppC3oQsy10h2J3j_CH9j3cny17MoC82js4h0Umn76S77wj5KKTNrEvnsVEFj3nJk9iYuYxLPMQz4P4Y59k-f-anl_zHar4KG26bEFY52ERvqMvG4h75jHGECsjQ9PXmT4xVo_B0NZTQuE8eIHUZhnSJ1ehwpUImckiUkflsA7ZYYj5ygmk7CpDlZDHynP3_W-adpWkaNrmzDp08IY8DgKSLXuNPyT1XPyMPz8IR-XNyG5g-17RPgKRNRc8vzhb0_Hg5O1rS65re9AwTcG98PhG1qPqWDvHotGvobjQ6rZsSrqYuaYlws-4oXLG60RdqaOu6thkSNiluPazhG5Hqs6WevPYFuTw5Xh6dxqHuQmxzJjtQm3SAW0rlJKArQJBVCi53MndZlguHT8xwJxIrsrwqrQJbq7LKscIpl_FKZC_JXt3Ubp9QU0lh89RUChy3QjJlpeIVUyYvuAUkEpF0UIC2gZQca2OstXdOZK57pWlQmvZK0yIin8d3QofdKf0N9TpKIp22_6Bpr3SYnbpIRcEzLsoCRiwTiKEsc0XupEoq5lhE3uGo0H1u6mgU9CIHkwg-tlQR-eAlkFKjxpidK7PdbPT3i18ToU9BqGrgX1oTUiCgr5CFayJ5OJGEOW-nzcPw1MHmbPS_GRKR92MzvolxdLVrtl4GIB1Aeh6RV_1oHnsmY-A7prmMiJiM80nXTVvq69-ekVzgLkGmXt_9sw7II-Ynn4yT-SHZ69qtewOQrive-nn7FwHZSds priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Clinical impact of PSMA PET/CT in primary prostate cancer compared to conventional nodal and distant staging: a retrospective single center study |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32758168 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2435229781 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2431813104 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC7409439 https://doaj.org/article/b17b4347db9b4270910c2eb6e890f2e2 |
Volume | 20 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1ta9swEBZ9gbEvY-_z1mXaGOzD8OoXxZIGYySlpRukhDSBsC9CluWuEOzNcWD7GfvHu5PtLGalXxwSnY0j3Z2ek3TPEfKWCxMbGw59LVPms4wFvtZD4We4iach_NHWsX1eJOcL9nU5XO6RrtxR24HrG0M7rCe1qFYffv38_RkM_pMzeJEcr8HHCswzDjAdRwJi3CeHMDNxNNQJ-7erwIWrUBeCQ8ZdBd4l0dz4jN5E5fj8__faO9NW_0jlzhx1dp_ca8ElHTXa8IDs2eIhuTNpt88fkT8tC-iKNsmRtMzp9HIyotPT-fHJnF4X9EfDPgGfpcs1ogbVoqLdWXVal3T3pDotygyuushohlC0qClcsfLRR6ppZeuq7JI5KS5LrOCJSANaUUds-5gszk7nJ-d-W5PBN0kkahhSYQHTZNIKQF6ALvMQwvFgaOM44Ra_RZpZHhgeJ3lmJPhhGec2Sq20Mct5_IQcFGVhnxGqc8FNEupcQlCXikgaIVkeSZ2kzABK8UjYDYAyLWE51s1YKRe4iEQ1g6Zg0JQbNMU98n57T9tht0qPcVy3kki17X4oqyvVWq5KQ56ymPEsBW2OOOIrE9k0sUIGeWQjj7xCrVBN3urWYahRAu4S4m8hPfLGSSDdRoHnea70Zr1WXy5nPaF3rVBewr80uk2PgL5Chq6e5FFPEvyB6Td36qk6c1IRQ6CN_GYeeb1txjvxjF1hy42TAbgHcJ955GmjzdueiSOIK8NEeIT39LzXdf2W4vq7YyvnuIIQy-e3v_ULcjdyxif8YHhEDupqY18C3KvTAdnnSz4gh-PTi-ls4BZNBs6u4Tobf_sLmqxTJQ |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELdGJwEviG8CgxkE4gFFTRw3dpAQ6samlq1VtXXS3ozjOGNSlYy0FeLP4B_hb-QuXzRC2tteUrW-RKnvfB_23e8IeSukCYz1B66OYu7yhHuu1gPpJniIpyH80bZE-5yGozP-9XxwvkX-NLUwmFbZ6MRSUSe5wT3yPuPoKiBC0-erHy52jcLT1aaFRiUWR_bXTwjZlp_GX4C_7xg7PJjvj9y6q4BrQiZX8FLSglVOIivBdwD_KPUhoPQGNghCYfEb09wKz4ggTBODLeijILUstpENeCoCeO4tss0DCGV6ZHvvYDo7ac8thPRkU5ojw_4StL_ECmgPC4Ui8GU75q_sEvC_Ldgwht1EzQ3Ld3if3KtdVjqsZOwB2bLZQ3J7Uh_KPyK_a2zRBa1KLmme0tnpZEhnB_P-_pxeZvSqwrSAz7ysYKIGha2gTQY8XeV0M_-dZnkCV50lNEEHN1tRuGI_pY9U08KuirwpEaW42bGAJyK4aEFLuNzH5OxGePKE9LI8s88I1akUJvR1GkGoGEsWGRnxlEU6jLkB38chfsMAZWoYdOzGsVBlOCRDVTFNAdNUyTQlHPKhvaeesGup95CvLSUCeJc_5MWFqvWBin0R84CLJIY1wgR6bYbZOLQy8lJmmUN2USpUVQ3bqiE1DEEJQ1QvI4e8KSkQxCPDLKELvV4u1fj0pEP0viZKc_iXRtdFFzBXiPvVodzpUIKWMd3hRjxVreWW6t-adMjrdhjvxMy9zObrkgacSAgiuEOeVtLczkzAIFr1Q-kQ0ZHzztR1R7LL7yUGusB9iSB6fv1r7ZI7o_nkWB2Pp0cvyF1WLkTpeoMd0lsVa_sSHMpV_KpexZR8u2nF8Rcue4gG |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical+impact+of+PSMA+PET%2FCT+in+primary+prostate+cancer+compared+to+conventional+nodal+and+distant+staging%3A+a+retrospective+single+center+study&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Donswijk%2C+Maarten+L&rft.au=van+Leeuwen%2C+Pim+J&rft.au=Vegt%2C+Erik&rft.au=Cheung%2C+Zing&rft.date=2020-08-05&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2407&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-020-07192-7&rft.externalDocID=A631882589 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon |