Prediction of three lipid derivatives for postoperative gastric cancer mortality: the Fujian prospective investigation of cancer (FIESTA) study

As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lip...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC cancer Vol. 18; no. 1; pp. 785 - 12
Main Authors Hu, Dan, Peng, Feng, Lin, Xiandong, Chen, Gang, Liang, Binying, Chen, Ying, Li, Chao, Zhang, Hejun, Fan, Guohui, Xu, Guodong, Xia, Yan, Lin, Jinxiu, Zheng, Xiongwei, Niu, Wenquan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 06.08.2018
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR. Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015. Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability. Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.
AbstractList Background As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR. Methods Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015. Results Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability. Conclusions Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy. Keywords: The FIESTA study, Gastric cancer, Lipid derivative, Metabolic syndrome, Mortality, Prognosis
As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR.BACKGROUNDAs we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR.Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015.METHODSGastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015.Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability.RESULTSFinally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability.Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.CONCLUSIONSOur results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.
As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR. Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015. Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability. Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.
As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR. Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015. Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability. Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.
Abstract Background As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further extension, we evaluated the prediction of three lipid derivatives generated from triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high- and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLC and LDLC) at baseline for postoperative gastric cancer mortality by prospectively analysing 3012 patients. The three lipid derivatives included the ratio of TC minus HDLC to HDLC known as atherogenic index (AI), the ratio of TG to HDLC abbreviated as THR and the ratio of LDLC to HDLC abbreviated as LHR. Methods Gastric cancer patients who received gastrectomy between January 2000 and December 2010 were consecutively recruited from Fujian Cancer Hospital. Follow-up assessment was implemented annually before December 2015. Results Finally, there were 1331 deaths from gastric cancer and 1681 survivors, with a median follow-up time of 44.05 months. 3012 patients were evenly randomized into the derivation group and the validation group, and both groups were well balanced at baseline. Overall adjusted estimates in the derivation group were statistically significant for three lipid derivatives (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.20, 1.17 and 1.19 for AI, THR and LHR, respectively, all P < 0.001), and were reproducible in the validation group. The risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was more obvious in males than females, in patients with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II than stage III-IV, in patients with intestinal-type than diffuse-type gastric cancer, in patients with normal weight than obesity, and in patients without hypertension than with hypertension, especially for AI and LHR, and all results were reproducible. Calibration and discrimination statistics showed good reclassification performance and predictive accuracy when separately adding three lipid derivatives to baseline risk model. A prognostic nomogram was accordingly built based on significant attributes to facilitate risk assessment, with a good prediction capability. Conclusions Our results indicate that preoperative lipid derivatives, especially AI and LHR, are powerful predictors of postoperative gastric cancer mortality, with more obvious prediction in patients of male gender or with tumor-node-metastasis stage I-II or intestinal-type gastric cancer, and in the absence of obesity or hypertension before gastrectomy.
[...]a prognostic nomogram displaying 3-year, 5-year and 10-year gastric cancer mortality was constructed for clinical application among all study patients. 1.12–1.44, < 0.001 1.29, 1.11–1.51, 0.001 1.42, 1.20–1.66, < 0.001 1.21, 1.11–1.32, < 0.001 1.34, 1.14–1.58, < 0.001 Diffuse type 1.19, 1.12–1.27, < 0.001 1.16, 1.07–1.26, < 0.001 1.17, 1.10–1.24, 0.001 1.13, 1.04–1.22, 0.003 1.12, 1.05–1.23, 0.003 1.16, 1.06–1.27, 0.001 Tumor embolus Positive 1.23, 1.13–1.35, < 0.001 1.23, 1.14–1.33, < 0.001 1.28, 1.15–1.42, < 0.001 1.29, 1.15–1.44, < 0.001 1.16, 1.04–1.28, 0.006 1.27, 1.13–1.43, < 0.001 Negative 1.17, 1.09–1.26, < 0.001 1.11, 1.03–1.21, 0.011 1.16, 1.08–1.23, < 0.001 1.25, 1.12–1.40, < 0.001 1.16, 1.06–1.28, 0.002 1.22, 1.09–1.37, 0.001 Obesity With 1.11, 1.04–1.19, 0.031 1.13, 1.03–1.24, 0.012 1.09, 1.00–1.19, 0.051 1.12, 1.01–1.22, 0.042 1.07, 0.95–1.20, 0.276 1.07, 0.91–1.26, 0.399 Without 1.26, 1.10–1.43, 0.001 1.18, 1.10–1.26, < 0.001 1.24, 1.09–1.40, 0.001 1.31, 1.20–1.43, < 0.001 1.21, 1.11–1.32, < 0.001 1.30, 1.18–1.42, < 0.001 Hypertension With 1.07, 0.94–1.22, 0.338 1.05, 0.92–1.19, 0.502 1.08, 0.94–1.24, 0.271 1.17, 1.01–1.35, 0.037 1.14, 1.00–1.29, 0.045 1.15, 0.98–1.35, 0.096 Without 1.22, 1.15–1.30, < 0.001 1.21, 1.14–1.28, < 0.001 1.21, 1.14–1.28, < 0.001 1.30, 1.18–1.42, < 0.001 1.16, 1.07–1.26, 0.001 1.27, 1.16–1.39, < 0.001 Diabetes With 1.13, 1.04–1.22, 0.004 1.08, 1.02–1.16, 0.013 1.14, 1.05–1.25, 0.001 1.17, 1.08–1.28, 0.002 1.07, 0.98–1.16, 0.106 1.18, 1.08–1.29, < 0.001 Without 1.18, 1.07–1.29, 0.001 1.16, 0.98–1.36, 0.080 1.15, 1.06–1.26, 0.001 1.21, 1.08–1.36, < 0.001 1.20, 1.05–1.38, 0.010 1.20, 1.09–1.30, < 0.001 Data are expressed as hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval, P value. Besides unadjusted overall estimates, the other risk estimates were calculated after adjusting for age, gender, smoking, drinking, family cancer history, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, TNM stage, tumor size, Lauren’s classification, number of lymph node metastasis and tumor embolus by removing the characteristic itself in stratified analysis Abbreviations: AI atherogenic index, THR the triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, LHR the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio, TNM tumor-node-metastasis By gender, the risk prediction of three lipid derivatives was markedly corroborated in male patients compared with female patients in both derivation and validation groups, especially for AI (HR, 95% CI, P: 1.27, 1.17–1.38, < 0.001 in the derivation group and 1.30, 1.18–1.43, < 0.001 in the validation group) and LHR (1.25, 1.15–1.36, < 0.001 in the derivation group and 1.26, 1.16–1.38, < 0.001 in the validation group). [...]our findings can be easily applied for risk assessment in routine clinical practice. [...]the effects of lipid-lowering agents on the prognosis of gastric cancer patients remained unexplored, as such data were currently lacking, which might generate a systematic bias and unaccounted residual confounding.
ArticleNumber 785
Audience Academic
Author Zhang, Hejun
Niu, Wenquan
Chen, Ying
Lin, Xiandong
Fan, Guohui
Liang, Binying
Hu, Dan
Lin, Jinxiu
Peng, Feng
Xia, Yan
Chen, Gang
Xu, Guodong
Li, Chao
Zheng, Xiongwei
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dan
  surname: Hu
  fullname: Hu, Dan
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Feng
  surname: Peng
  fullname: Peng, Feng
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Xiandong
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Xiandong
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Gang
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Gang
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Binying
  surname: Liang
  fullname: Liang, Binying
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Ying
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Ying
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Chao
  surname: Li
  fullname: Li, Chao
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Hejun
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Hejun
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Guohui
  surname: Fan
  fullname: Fan, Guohui
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Guodong
  surname: Xu
  fullname: Xu, Guodong
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Yan
  surname: Xia
  fullname: Xia, Yan
– sequence: 12
  givenname: Jinxiu
  surname: Lin
  fullname: Lin, Jinxiu
– sequence: 13
  givenname: Xiongwei
  surname: Zheng
  fullname: Zheng, Xiongwei
– sequence: 14
  givenname: Wenquan
  orcidid: 0000-0003-1715-3372
  surname: Niu
  fullname: Niu, Wenquan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30081869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9k99q2zAUxs3oWNtsD7CbYRiM9sKdZEu2tItBKM0WKGys3bVQ5KNEwbFcSQ7LU-yVp_xpF5cxfCFz9Ps-HR2dc56ctLaFJHmL0RXGrPzocc4YzRBmGaG8zDYvkjNMKpzlBFUnR_-nybn3S4RwxRB7lZwWCLFowM-S398d1EYFY9vU6jQsHEDamM7UaQ3OrGUwa_Cpti7trA-2A7cLpXPpgzMqVbJV4NKVdUE2Jmw-RQ9IJ_3SyDbtnPUdqJ3AtNEomLl8POugvJhMb-7ux5epD329eZ281LLx8OawjpKfk5v766_Z7bcv0-vxbabKnIaMoqquZ5iXFZ9pDLMqL3SBakVyzllBGEWca1wA05hoNtOaEwka56jgecEBF6NkuvetrVyKzpmVdBthpRG7gHVzIV0wqgEhcxYVWlFNc8IVkhpTIJRAiRRSrIpen_deXT9bQa2gDU42A9PhTmsWYm7XokQsJrRN5uJg4OxDH6skVsYraBrZgu29yBEjEeMx_VHy_hm6tL1rY6kixVFBI0v_UnMZL2BabeO5amsqxpSWnFFakEhd_YOKXw0ro2KraRPjA8HlQBCZAL_CXPbei-ndjyH74YhdgGzCwtum376-H4Lvjqv3VLbHHo0A3gMqdpN3oJ8QjMR2DsR-DkScA7GdA7GJmuqZRpmw67x4RdP8R_kHYo4Lyw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2147_CMAR_S418487
crossref_primary_10_2147_OTT_S245663
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2022_1050643
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnut_2024_1431466
crossref_primary_10_1155_2021_8180424
crossref_primary_10_1002_cam4_5116
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2023_1100820
crossref_primary_10_56766_ntms_1297303
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2019_00427
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2018_00461
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12986_023_00728_1
Cites_doi 10.3322/caac.21262
10.1186/s12885-016-2336-8
10.1007/s10120-015-0504-1
10.18632/oncotarget.11247
10.2337/dc11-0209
10.1038/onc.2014.204
10.18632/oncotarget.13524
10.1002/ijc.28999
10.1002/ijc.24290
10.1002/cncr.28393
10.18632/oncotarget.14303
10.3892/ijo.2017.4000
10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4
10.1002/ijc.30404
10.1186/s12885-016-2510-z
10.18632/aging.101459
10.1097/MD.0000000000005351
10.7150/jca.23631
10.1007/s10552-012-0096-6
10.1371/journal.pone.0089965
10.1007/s10654-014-9884-5
10.1001/jama.1993.03500230097036
10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.035
10.1155/2012/792034
10.4082/kjfm.2015.36.6.335
10.7150/jca.18707
10.1007/s10552-015-0675-4
10.1093/cvr/cvt234
10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.015
10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.004
10.1177/0272989X06295361
10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.07.004
10.1161/01.CIR.88.5.2460
10.1002/ijc.30588
10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.001
10.1186/s12885-018-4063-9
10.3322/caac.21338
10.1016/j.clinre.2013.11.009
10.7150/jca.18000
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s). 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s). 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
ISR
3V.
7TO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
K9.
M0S
M1P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-4596-y
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic

MEDLINE



Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1471-2407
EndPage 12
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_a289e1fc5f5249c0af15e454e60c0c87
PMC6080391
A556985534
30081869
10_1186_s12885_018_4596_y
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
  grantid: 2015J01451
– fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
  grantid: 2016J01508
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 2015J01451; 2016J01508
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
53G
5VS
6J9
6PF
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7TO
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
H94
K9.
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
PUEGO
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c625t-507ddb19679bf1eb723f30dc429983485099f13e8f14f8bff94aef12039239e13
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2407
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 00:26:07 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:03:06 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 24 03:58:25 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 00:19:44 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:35:20 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:25:48 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:07:55 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:14:24 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 23:01:41 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:06:09 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:59:45 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords The FIESTA study
Lipid derivative
Prognosis
Metabolic syndrome
Gastric cancer
Mortality
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c625t-507ddb19679bf1eb723f30dc429983485099f13e8f14f8bff94aef12039239e13
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0003-1715-3372
OpenAccessLink https://www.proquest.com/docview/2090352085?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication%
PMID 30081869
PQID 2090352085
PQPubID 44074
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_a289e1fc5f5249c0af15e454e60c0c87
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6080391
proquest_miscellaneous_2084913920
proquest_journals_2090352085
gale_infotracmisc_A556985534
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A556985534
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A556985534
gale_healthsolutions_A556985534
pubmed_primary_30081869
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12885_018_4596_y
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12885_018_4596_y
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-08-06
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-08-06
PublicationDate_xml – month: 08
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-08-06
  day: 06
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC cancer
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Cancer
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References B Lindkvist (4596_CR27) 2013; 24
X Yu (4596_CR8) 2016; 16
D Hu (4596_CR16) 2017; 8
EH Kim (4596_CR31) 2014; 38
D Hu (4596_CR12) 2016; 7
AJ Vickers (4596_CR23) 2006; 26
N Brusselaers (4596_CR39) 2017; 140
W Chen (4596_CR2) 2016; 66
D Hu (4596_CR13) 2017; 8
H Sha (4596_CR15) 2018; 9
D Hu (4596_CR9) 2017; 15
X Pu (4596_CR24) 2014; 120
JY Park (4596_CR5) 2016; 16
4596_CR34
XL Wei (4596_CR30) 2014; 9
LA Torre (4596_CR6) 2015; 65
F Peng (4596_CR14) 2017; 16
L Lin (4596_CR29) 2015; 34
P Bertuccio (4596_CR3) 2009; 125
YM Park (4596_CR4) 2016; 95
F Peng (4596_CR19) 2018; 52
F Peng (4596_CR20) 2018; 10
W Wulaningsih (4596_CR37) 2012; 2012
Y Lin (4596_CR26) 2015; 26
S Xiao (4596_CR25) 2017; 51
WC Chang (4596_CR32) 2017; 8
SB Edge (4596_CR22) 2010; 17
M Plummer (4596_CR1) 2015; 136
F Peng (4596_CR17) 2016; 139
B Eliasson (4596_CR10) 2011; 34
HC Prosser (4596_CR38) 2014; 101
F Feng (4596_CR7) 2018; 18
XJ Zhang (4596_CR40) 2013; 44
MA Pourhoseingholi (4596_CR28) 2017; 15
D Perloff (4596_CR21) 1993; 88
CY Ock (4596_CR33) 2016; 19
Association C (4596_CR35) 2004
F Peng (4596_CR18) 2017; 8
HR Park (4596_CR11) 2015; 36
M His (4596_CR36) 2014; 29
References_xml – volume: 65
  start-page: 87
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 4596_CR6
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
– volume: 16
  start-page: 340
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR5
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2336-8
– volume: 19
  start-page: 421
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR33
  publication-title: Gastric Cancer
  doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0504-1
– volume: 7
  start-page: 65247
  issue: 40
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR12
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11247
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2095
  issue: 9
  year: 2011
  ident: 4596_CR10
  publication-title: Diabetes Care
  doi: 10.2337/dc11-0209
– volume: 34
  start-page: 2700
  issue: 21
  year: 2015
  ident: 4596_CR29
  publication-title: Oncogene
  doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.204
– volume: 8
  start-page: 692
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR32
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13524
– volume: 136
  start-page: 487
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 4596_CR1
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.28999
– volume: 125
  start-page: 666
  issue: 3
  year: 2009
  ident: 4596_CR3
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.24290
– volume: 120
  start-page: 11
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 4596_CR24
  publication-title: Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/cncr.28393
– volume: 8
  start-page: 23841
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR13
  publication-title: Oncotarget
  doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14303
– volume: 51
  start-page: 5
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR25
  publication-title: Int J Oncol
  doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4000
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1471
  issue: 6
  year: 2010
  ident: 4596_CR22
  publication-title: Ann Surg Oncol
  doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4
– volume: 139
  start-page: 2705
  issue: 12
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR17
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.30404
– volume: 16
  start-page: 480
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR8
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2510-z
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1166
  issue: 5
  year: 2018
  ident: 4596_CR20
  publication-title: Aging (Albany NY)
  doi: 10.18632/aging.101459
– volume: 95
  start-page: e5351
  issue: 44
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR4
  publication-title: Medicine (Baltimore)
  doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005351
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1173
  issue: 7
  year: 2018
  ident: 4596_CR15
  publication-title: J Cancer
  doi: 10.7150/jca.23631
– volume: 24
  start-page: 107
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 4596_CR27
  publication-title: Cancer Causes Control
  doi: 10.1007/s10552-012-0096-6
– volume: 9
  start-page: e89965
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 4596_CR30
  publication-title: PLoS One
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089965
– volume: 29
  start-page: 119
  issue: 2
  year: 2014
  ident: 4596_CR36
  publication-title: Eur J Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1007/s10654-014-9884-5
– ident: 4596_CR34
  doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03500230097036
– volume: 16
  start-page: 115
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR14
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.01.035
– volume: 2012
  start-page: 792034
  year: 2012
  ident: 4596_CR37
  publication-title: J Cancer Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1155/2012/792034
– volume: 36
  start-page: 335
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 4596_CR11
  publication-title: Korean J Fam Med
  doi: 10.4082/kjfm.2015.36.6.335
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1214
  issue: 7
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR16
  publication-title: J Cancer
  doi: 10.7150/jca.18707
– volume: 26
  start-page: 1825
  issue: 12
  year: 2015
  ident: 4596_CR26
  publication-title: Cancer Causes Control
  doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0675-4
– volume: 101
  start-page: 145
  issue: 1
  year: 2014
  ident: 4596_CR38
  publication-title: Cardiovasc Res
  doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvt234
– volume: 15
  start-page: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR28
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.015
– volume: 15
  start-page: 73
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR9
  publication-title: EBioMedicine
  doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.12.004
– volume: 26
  start-page: 565
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  ident: 4596_CR23
  publication-title: Med Decis Mak
  doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361
– volume: 44
  start-page: 437
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  ident: 4596_CR40
  publication-title: Arch Med Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2013.07.004
– volume: 88
  start-page: 2460
  issue: 5 Pt 1
  year: 1993
  ident: 4596_CR21
  publication-title: Circulation
  doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.88.5.2460
– volume: 140
  start-page: 1693
  issue: 7
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR39
  publication-title: Int J Cancer
  doi: 10.1002/ijc.30588
– volume: 52
  start-page: 148
  year: 2018
  ident: 4596_CR19
  publication-title: Cancer Epidemiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2018.01.001
– volume-title: The suggestion on Chinese metabolic syndrome
  year: 2004
  ident: 4596_CR35
– volume: 18
  start-page: 151
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  ident: 4596_CR7
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4063-9
– volume: 66
  start-page: 115
  issue: 2
  year: 2016
  ident: 4596_CR2
  publication-title: CA Cancer J Clin
  doi: 10.3322/caac.21338
– volume: 38
  start-page: 372
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 4596_CR31
  publication-title: Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.11.009
– volume: 8
  start-page: 967
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 4596_CR18
  publication-title: J Cancer
  doi: 10.7150/jca.18000
SSID ssj0017808
Score 2.3205764
Snippet As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a further...
Background As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As a...
[...]a prognostic nomogram displaying 3-year, 5-year and 10-year gastric cancer mortality was constructed for clinical application among all study patients....
Abstract Background As we previously reported, the presence of preoperative metabolic syndrome can predict the significant risk of gastric cancer mortality. As...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 785
SubjectTerms Aged
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
China - epidemiology
Cholesterol
Cholesterol - blood
Cholesterol, HDL - blood
Cholesterol, LDL - blood
Decision Support Techniques
Female
Gastrectomy
Gastrectomy - adverse effects
Gastrectomy - mortality
Gastric cancer
Hospitals
Humans
Hypertension
Lipid derivative
Lipids
Low density lipoprotein
Male
Medical prognosis
Metabolic syndrome
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Mortality
Nomograms
Patient outcomes
Patients
Predictive Value of Tests
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Stomach cancer
Stomach Neoplasms - blood
Stomach Neoplasms - mortality
Stomach Neoplasms - pathology
Stomach Neoplasms - surgery
Surgical outcomes
Survival analysis
The FIESTA study
Thoracic surgery
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Triglycerides - blood
Tumors
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9QwEA9yD-KL-G311CiCH1AuaZI29W0Vl1M4Eb2DewtpmtytnN1lP4T7K_yXnUmzdYugL74tzaTbzvySzDST3xDynEvFvAhVbsHeudQ-5DpYnofAtPUOotwWv0MefSoPT-THU3W6U-oLc8J6euBecQcWIgLPg1NBQaTgmA1ceamkL5ljTsdz5LDmbYOptH9QaabTHibX5cEKZmGNSWo6l6ou88vRKhTJ-v-cknfWpHG-5M4CNL1BrifPkU76J75JrvjuFrl6lPbGb5Ofn5f4GxVN54GuwUieXswWs5a2ALMfkeF7RcFJpQtk01j4nvSbnlms3eGoQwAs6ffokINz_gbu4el08w0QROFxt4cy6ew3N0f_X6nnyyn4lseTVzRy1t4hJ9P3x-8O81RuIXcQBK1z8AzbtoERWdVN4L6pChEEax2uWFpIDa5FHbjwOnAZdBNCLa0PvGDgYgmwkbhL9rp55-8T2hRN1YTS27qyUjZOO10DBBRrQ8mDEhlhW_Ubl7jIsSTGhYkxiS5NbzEDFjNoMXOZkddDl0VPxPE34bdo00EQObTjBUCWScgy_0JWRp4gIkx_IHWYCcxEqbLWSgmZkWdRAnk0OkzUObOb1cp8-PplJPQiCYU5vKOz6dwDaAqpt0aS-yNJGOhu3LyFpkkTzcoU-J1NYaHVjDwdmrEnJs91fr5BGS2R_bVgGbnXI3nQjOg5DeuMVCOMj1Q3bulm55GGvIRgQ9T8wf_Q9UNyrcDRibk45T7ZWy83_hF4e-vmcRzYvwC8lFOn
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3di9QwEA96gvgifls9NYrgBxSTTdImvsgqLqdwInoH-xbaNFlXznbd7gr3V_gvO9Nme1eEe1s2k912vjKTTH5DyHMuFfMi5GkB8k6l9iHVoeBpCEwX3kGWW-E-5OGX7OBYfp6redxwa2NZ5c4ndo66ahzukUOSbhC6EyKEd6vfKXaNwtPV2ELjMrmC0GWo1fl8SLh4rpmOJ5lcZ29a8MUaS9V0KpXJ0tPRWtRB9v_vmM-tTOOqyXPL0OwGuR7jRzrtBX6TXPL1LXL1MJ6Q3yZ_v67xM7KbNoFuQFSenixXy4pWoGx_OpzvlkKoSleIqbHyPfQ3XRTYwcNRh2qwpr-6sBxC9LfwG57Otj9Bjyg87u5qJl2eIXT0_xVnvpxBhHk0fUU75No75Hj28ejDQRqbLqQOUqFNCvFhVZVgl7kpA_dlPhFBsMrhuqWF1BBgmMCF14HLoMsQjCx84BMGgZYwnou7ZK9uan-f0HJS5mXIfGHyQsrSaacNKIJiVch4UCIhbMd-6yIiOTbGOLFdZqIz20vMgsQsSsyeJuT1MGXVw3FcRPweZToQIpJ290WzXthomLaAjNPz4FRQkIk6VgSuvFTSZ8wxp_OEPEGNsP211MEf2KlSmdFKCZmQZx0FomnUWK6zKLZtaz99_zYiehGJQgPv6Ip4-wE4hQBcI8r9ESWYuxsP71TTRnfT2jPjSMjTYRhnYgld7Zst0miJGLATlpB7vSYPnBE9sqFJSD7S8RHrxiP18kcHRp5ByiEMf3DxYz0k1yZod1hrk-2Tvc166x9BNLcpH3cm-w8ki0r_
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Prediction of three lipid derivatives for postoperative gastric cancer mortality: the Fujian prospective investigation of cancer (FIESTA) study
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30081869
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2090352085
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2084913920
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6080391
https://doaj.org/article/a289e1fc5f5249c0af15e454e60c0c87
Volume 18
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3ri9NAEB_uAcd9Ed9Gz7qK4AOieewmG0GklSun0OOoVyj3ZUk2u7VS09qH2L_Cf9mZJO1d8PRLKd3ZtJ3Hzszu7G8AnvtceCa0sZuivF0ujXWlTX3XWk-mRmOWm9M-ZO80Ohnwz0Mx3IFNe6uagYtrUzvqJzWYT978-rH-gAb_vjR4Gb1d4BorqQRNulwkkbvehX10TDE1NOjxy0OFWHqyPti8dtohHIQVxFvS8FIlmP_fS_YVn9Wsp7zioLo34UYdWbJ2pQq3YMcUt-GgV5-d34HfZ3N6T4JgU8uWKETDJuPZOGc5quHPEgF8wTCIZTNC25iZChScjVLq7aGZJgWZs-8lrzB4f4fPMKy7-oYaxvDnbi5tsvEldkf1XfXMl12MPc_br1iJaXsXBt3j848nbt2OwdWYJC1djBzzPEOLjZPM-iaLg9CGXq7Jo8mQSww9EuuHRlqfW5lZm_DUWD_wMAQLE-OH92CvmBbmAbAsyOLMRiZN4pTzTEstE1QR4eU28q0IHfA27Fe6xiqnlhkTVeYsMlKV8BQKT5Hw1NqB19spswqo43_EHZLplpAwtssPpvORqk1WpZiLGt9qYQXmqNpLrS8MF9xEnva0jB14Qhqhqgur25VCtYWIEilEyB14VlIQzkZBhTyjdLVYqE9f-g2iFzWRneJ_1Gl9LwI5RdBcDcqjBiUuBLo5vFFNtbEjFdA-nKBGrA483Q7TTCquK8x0RTSSEzps4Dlwv9LkLWc2BuFA3NDxBuuaI8X4awlTHmEyEib-w38-8xEcBmR9VIATHcHecr4yjzHEW2Yt2I2HcQv2O8enZ_1WuVHSKo0ZX_udiz_P4VK4
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1bb9MwFLbGkIAXxJ3AYAaBuEgRcWInDhJC5VK1bJ0Q66S-mcSxS9FISi-g_gr-Cb-Rc3LbIqS97a1qjtPU5_O5xMffIeQJ48IzgY3cBPTtcmmsK23CXGs9mRgNWW6G7yFHB-HgiH-aiMkW-duchcGyysYmloY6KzS-I4ckPUbqTogQ3s5_utg1CndXmxYaFSz2zOY3pGzLN8MPoN-nvt__OH4_cOuuAq6GWH_lQgCUZSkAL4pTy0wa-YENvEyjYZYBl-BBY8sCIy3jVqbWxjwxlvkeRBJBbFgA971ALoLj9TDZiyZtgsci6cl655TJ8NUSbL_E0jjpchGH7qbj-8oWAf87glOesFulecrt9a-Rq3W8SnsVwK6TLZPfIJdG9Y78TfLn8wI_o3ppYekKoGHo8Ww-y2gG4P5V8oovKYTGdI4cHnNTUY3TaYIdQzTVCLsF_VGmAZASvIZ7GNpffwfcUnjc5igonZ0wglS_VY983oeIdtx7QUum3Fvk6FzUcZts50Vu7hKa-mmU2tAkcZRwnmqpZQzAE15mQ2ZF4BCvmX6lawZ0bMRxrMpMSIaq0pgCjSnUmNo45GU7ZF7Rf5wl_A512goic3f5RbGYqtoQqAQyXMOsFlZA5qu9xDJhuOAm9LSnZeSQXUSEqo7BtvZH9YQIYylEwB3yuJRA9o4cy4OmyXq5VMPDLx2hZ7WQLeA_6qQ-bQEzhYRfHcmdjiSYF9293EBT1eZtqU4Wo0MetZdxJJbs5aZYo4zkyDnrew65UyG5nZmgYlKMHRJ1MN6Zuu6VfPatJD8PIcUJYnbv7MfaJZcH49G-2h8e7N0nV3xcg1jnE-6Q7dVibR5AJLlKH5bLl5Kv520v_gF3PYa6
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction+of+three+lipid+derivatives+for+postoperative+gastric+cancer+mortality%3A+the+Fujian+prospective+investigation+of+cancer+%28FIESTA%29+study&rft.jtitle=BMC+cancer&rft.au=Hu%2C+Dan&rft.au=Peng%2C+Feng&rft.au=Lin%2C+Xiandong&rft.au=Chen%2C+Gang&rft.date=2018-08-06&rft.eissn=1471-2407&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=785&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12885-018-4596-y&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F30081869&rft.externalDocID=30081869
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2407&client=summon