OX40L blockade is therapeutic in arthritis, despite promoting osteoclastogenesis
An immune response is essential for protection against infection, but, in many individuals, aberrant responses against self tissues cause autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). How to diminish the autoimmune response while not augmenting infectious risk is a challenge. Modern targete...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 111; no. 6; pp. 2289 - 2294 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
United States
National Academy of Sciences
11.02.2014
National Acad Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.1321071111 |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | An immune response is essential for protection against infection, but, in many individuals, aberrant responses against self tissues cause autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). How to diminish the autoimmune response while not augmenting infectious risk is a challenge. Modern targeted therapies such as anti-TNF or anti-CD20 antibodies ameliorate disease, but at the cost of some increase in infectious risk. Approaches that might specifically reduce autoimmunity and tissue damage without infectious risk would be important. Here we describe that TNF superfamily member OX40 ligand (OX40L; CD252), which is expressed predominantly on antigen-presenting cells, and its receptor OX40 (on activated T cells), are restricted to the inflamed joint in arthritis in mice with collagen-induced arthritis and humans with RA. Blockade of this pathway in arthritic mice reduced inflammation and restored tissue integrity predominantly by inhibiting inflammatory cytokine production by OX40L-expressing macrophages. Furthermore, we identify a previously unknown role for OX40L in steady-state bone homeostasis. This work shows that more targeted approaches may augment the “therapeutic window” and increase the benefit/risk in RA, and possibly other autoimmune diseases, and are thus worth testing in humans. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321071111 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 4Present address: Manchester Collaborative Centre for Inflammation Research, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, United Kingdom. Author contributions: F.M., M.F., N.J.H., and T.H. designed research; E.G.F., L.D., J.M., M.M.C., K.M., F.M., R.J.S., and T.H. performed research; F.M. and S.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; E.G.F., L.D., J.M., M.M.C., K.M., F.M., R.J.S., S.S., P.C.T., N.J.H., and T.H. analyzed data; and E.G.F., M.F., P.C.T., and T.H. wrote the paper. 1E.G.F. and L.D. contributed equally to this work. 2Present address: MRC Centre for Inflammation Research, Queens Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4TJ, United Kingdom. Contributed by Marc Feldmann, November 19, 2013 (sent for review May 16, 2013) |
ISSN: | 0027-8424 1091-6490 1091-6490 |
DOI: | 10.1073/pnas.1321071111 |