Right-to-left shunt detection using contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler: A comparison of provocation maneuvers between coughing and a modified Valsalva maneuver

Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) has been used to detect right-to-left shunts (RLS) because it is highly sensitive and cost-effective. The use of provocation maneuvers, such as physiologic maneuvers (e.g., coughing) and the Valsalva maneuver (VM) to transiently increase right atrial pr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 12; no. 4; p. e0175049
Main Authors Wang, Si-Bo, Wang, Xiao-Cong, Ma, Yan, Liu, Kang-Ding, Xing, Ying-Qi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 06.04.2017
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) has been used to detect right-to-left shunts (RLS) because it is highly sensitive and cost-effective. The use of provocation maneuvers, such as physiologic maneuvers (e.g., coughing) and the Valsalva maneuver (VM) to transiently increase right atrial pressure and induce RLS increases the sensitivity of RLS detection. In this study, we sought to determine whether coughing is as effective as the VM in aiding the detection of RLS. We evaluated 162 subjects for RLS, using c-TCD under three different conditions: (i) resting state, (ii) coughing, and (iii) modified VM (m-VM), which involved blowing into a tube connected to a sphygmomanometer at 40 mmHg for 10 s. The positive rate of RLS detection with the m-VM was significantly higher than that with coughing. In addition, a difference between the two maneuvers was observed in terms of the degree of RLS seen. The m-VM should be widely used to detect RLS, because it is reliable, standardized, and cost-effective.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Conceptualization: YQX KDL.Data curation: SBW YM.Formal analysis: SBW XCW YM KDL YQX.Investigation: SBW.Methodology: YQX XCW.Writing – original draft: SBW.
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0175049