Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils

The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communiti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThe New phytologist Vol. 186; no. 4; pp. 968 - 979
Main Authors Verbruggen, Erik, Röling, Wilfred F. M., Gamper, Hannes A., Kowalchuk, George A., Verhoef, Herman A., van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford, UK Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.06.2010
Blackwell Publishing
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher β-diversity (between-site diversity). We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
AbstractList • The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species‐rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields.• To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi‐natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition.• The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher β‐diversity (between‐site diversity).• We suggest that organic management in agro‐ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below‐ground mutualists.
*The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. *To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. *The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher beta-diversity (between-site diversity). *We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
*The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. *To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. *The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher beta-diversity (between-site diversity). *We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.*The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. *To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. *The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher beta-diversity (between-site diversity). *We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
Summary; The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields.; To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition.; The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher b-diversity (between-site diversity).; We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher (3-diversity (between-site diversity). We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
Summary • The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species‐rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. • To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi‐natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. • The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher β‐diversity (between‐site diversity). • We suggest that organic management in agro‐ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below‐ground mutualists.
The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood, although AMF can provide benefit to plants and ecosystems. Here, we tested whether organic farming enhances AMF diversity and whether AMF communities from organically managed fields are more similar to those of species-rich grasslands or conventionally managed fields. To address this issue, the AMF community composition was assessed in 26 arable fields (13 pairs of organically and conventionally managed fields) and five semi-natural grasslands, all on sandy soil. Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism community fingerprinting was used to characterize AMF community composition. The average number of AMF taxa was highest in grasslands (8.8), intermediate in organically managed fields (6.4) and significantly lower in conventionally managed fields (3.9). Moreover, AMF richness increased significantly with the time since conversion to organic agriculture. AMF communities of organically managed fields were also more similar to those of natural grasslands when compared with those under conventional management, and were less uniform than their conventional counterparts, as expressed by higher β-diversity (between-site diversity). We suggest that organic management in agro-ecosystems contributes to the restoration and maintenance of these important below-ground mutualists.
Author van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
Kowalchuk, George A.
Röling, Wilfred F. M.
Verhoef, Herman A.
Verbruggen, Erik
Gamper, Hannes A.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Erik
  surname: Verbruggen
  fullname: Verbruggen, Erik
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Wilfred F. M.
  surname: Röling
  fullname: Röling, Wilfred F. M.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Hannes A.
  surname: Gamper
  fullname: Gamper, Hannes A.
– sequence: 4
  givenname: George A.
  surname: Kowalchuk
  fullname: Kowalchuk, George A.
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Herman A.
  surname: Verhoef
  fullname: Verhoef, Herman A.
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Marcel G. A.
  surname: van der Heijden
  fullname: van der Heijden, Marcel G. A.
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20345633$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkt1uFSEUhYmpsT_6CCqJF17NkZ8ZhjHRxDRqTRptok28IwwDIycMHGGwPT6EzyzjaXvRGw83m7C_tTaEdQwOfPAaAIjRCpf1ar3CNesqjmm7IqicIkooWl0_AEd3jQNwhBDhFavZ90NwnNIaIdQ1jDwChwTRumGUHoE_FyHZ2f7SUBuj1ZxgMDDEUXqroJFxsn6EwcNeu3BVjTFkP8Apz1k6m-b0GjoZR10lJZ2GKkwbGW0qfHGZtirE-MP-lg6a7MdSCjBlX-bpBK2HcoxWZTfnWHopWJceg4dGuqSf3NQTcPnh_bfTs-r8y8dPp-_OK8UIQVWvWau7DrVEctX0LVdIE047Ppim55ywlhHOqcKEcNm0w2DoULO2L9RgFDX0BLzc-W5i-Jl1msVkk9LOSa9DTqKtm44SzNEeJGkRQQ35P0lpvXzB4vniHrkOOfryYEGa5c6E4K5Qz26o3E96EJtoJxm34vbzCvB2B6gYUoraCGVnOdvg5yitExiJJS1iLZZQiCUUYkmL-JcWcV0M-D2D2xl7SN_spFfW6e3eOvH54mzZFf3TnX6d5hDv9DViDNcEl_7zXd_IIJacJHH5tThRhHmNKGf0L69n6pM
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_022_05715_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_14196
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_funeco_2024_101407
crossref_primary_10_1093_femsec_fiaa226
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_environ_110615_085750
crossref_primary_10_1890_10_1542_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2017_03_019
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_025_01900_w
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_14070
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0033819
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11368_015_1060_3
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2025_109749
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_814401
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_020_01007_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2019_05_003
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_1145_1_012008
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scienta_2015_09_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_05_002
crossref_primary_10_15302_J_FASE_2020336
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2018_11_027
crossref_primary_10_3934_agrfood_2018_2_120
crossref_primary_10_1108_IJPDLM_09_2021_0396
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2019_106596
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2012_12_019
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0148015
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11082012
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_016_0385_7
crossref_primary_10_3389_fevo_2019_00261
crossref_primary_10_1111_1574_6941_12080
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00449_022_02777_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_019_50354_2
crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10178
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2014_03_006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2011_02_002
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2015_10_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_ele_12085
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40793_024_00617_x
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2020_139173
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ejsobi_2023_103492
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_016_0373_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms11051307
crossref_primary_10_1002_ppp3_10602
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_018_25701_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_014_0895_x
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41564_023_01520_w
crossref_primary_10_1890_13_0156_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_020_00984_6
crossref_primary_10_3390_agriculture13101899
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy13020542
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_isci_2022_104636
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_funeco_2019_100864
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_018_4124_4
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2023_166343
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_14962
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_00052_20
crossref_primary_10_1093_femsec_fiaa145
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2022_160986
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2024_105723
crossref_primary_10_1080_13102818_2018_1427509
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1752_4571_2010_00145_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_023_02929_3
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0088454
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_016_0720_5
crossref_primary_10_4236_as_2018_99080
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13199_021_00767_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00216_014_7704_0
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13199_014_0303_1
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0209093
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_13056
crossref_primary_10_18615_anadolu_1130016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_012_0683_4
crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_3927
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2012_10_012
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy10121902
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_012_1398_x
crossref_primary_10_1094_PBIOMES_01_20_0002_R
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_12706
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_025_36133_9
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41396_022_01244_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_12268
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2017_07_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00253_012_4429_x
crossref_primary_10_4141_cjps_2014_284
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy12010208
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_021_04891_3
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_018_3647_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2012_06_004
crossref_primary_10_1890_ES14_00501_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2025_105909
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41579_022_00779_w
crossref_primary_10_1002_uar2_20035
crossref_primary_10_3934_agrfood_2018_3_280
crossref_primary_10_1071_CP14160
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2435_12657
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep08678
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_012_1545_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_294X_2012_05534_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_011_0425_8
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_011_0828_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_seh_2025_100140
crossref_primary_10_1088_1755_1315_713_1_012027
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_funeco_2016_10_001
crossref_primary_10_1094_PBIOMES_4_3
crossref_primary_10_1038_srep41911
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2014_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1079_PAVSNNR202116005
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2016_02_016
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsufs_2023_1124688
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plantsci_2017_08_004
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_12484
crossref_primary_10_1093_jpe_rtaa037
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41477_020_0656_9
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_scitotenv_2014_10_030
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2020_01519
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_pedobi_2014_01_004
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40538_024_00580_2
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_017_03248_0
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2014_07_025
crossref_primary_10_1080_15324982_2018_1425771
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2021_104140
crossref_primary_10_1002_ps_4145
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_012_0710_5
crossref_primary_10_1111_sum_12702
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2011_1550
crossref_primary_10_3390_f10100930
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2022_104562
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_018_05956_1
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_012_1357_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1462_2920_2010_02326_x
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_phyto_080615_100123
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41396_019_0383_2
crossref_primary_10_1890_13_1821_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2020_107790
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_12961
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2016_09_017
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_022_00887_9
crossref_primary_10_3389_fsoil_2023_1152524
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_12887
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2017_01_024
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00203_020_01915_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_15059
crossref_primary_10_3390_land5020010
crossref_primary_10_1080_00380768_2014_890916
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13568_018_0587_2
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00374_012_0770_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2011_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_03_012
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijerph17249157
crossref_primary_10_17221_999_2014_PSE
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_03_016
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11356_018_2803_7
crossref_primary_10_1093_ismejo_wraf023
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_15308
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2015_07_015
crossref_primary_10_1128_AEM_01372_12
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12815
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2017_12_020
crossref_primary_10_1038_ismej_2014_72
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_plgene_2016_11_003
crossref_primary_10_1111_jam_14247
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_foreco_2024_122327
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_rhisph_2020_100254
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2019_03109
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40168_023_01466_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2022_952910
crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_4518
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13199_019_00612_8
crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0233878
crossref_primary_10_3390_soilsystems8020064
crossref_primary_10_7554_eLife_62813
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2011_03995_x
crossref_primary_10_3390_su71215799
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170516000119
crossref_primary_10_1017_S1742170511000573
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13199_017_0487_2
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_13236
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agsy_2022_103489
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2019_107531
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_funeco_2019_01_001
crossref_primary_10_1139_w11_111
crossref_primary_10_1080_00380768_2019_1680573
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_011_0963_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2016_10_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_1462_2920_15492
crossref_primary_10_1080_15324982_2016_1177749
crossref_primary_10_1007_s42729_024_01963_y
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11829_023_09954_z
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2015_08_037
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_014_0231_8
crossref_primary_10_1111_pce_12600
crossref_primary_10_1139_cjm_2018_0134
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_023_04645_6
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2012_04348_x
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2023_1453
crossref_primary_10_29166_siembra_v11i2_7178
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_011_0419_6
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2021_104225
crossref_primary_10_1007_s13593_018_0545_z
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_021_01042_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00248_011_9834_7
crossref_primary_10_17660_ActaHortic_2018_1191_29
crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy11122494
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2014_01_033
crossref_primary_10_1111_aab_12469
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_023_06440_6
crossref_primary_10_1002_sae2_12032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2018_08_016
crossref_primary_10_1111_1365_2664_12351
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2020_103520
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2017_01263
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpls_2019_01312
crossref_primary_10_1111_gcb_15089
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_021_04858_4
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_019_00884_4
crossref_primary_10_1093_icb_icx006
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2016_07_013
crossref_primary_10_1111_mec_13079
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_015_0644_5
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2024_1463326
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2018_12_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2018_08_019
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_13288
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2020_108116
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2019_02969
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12275_022_1060_0
crossref_primary_10_1111_oik_01032
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_agee_2014_04_008
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1461_0248_2011_01666_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00572_013_0537_4
crossref_primary_10_5194_soil_3_45_2017
crossref_primary_10_1002_ldr_4164
crossref_primary_10_1080_07352689_2011_605741
crossref_primary_10_1094_PBIOMES_03_22_0014_R
crossref_primary_10_1080_03650340_2020_1839056
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cosust_2012_08_003
crossref_primary_10_1021_acs_est_2c03816
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tplants_2013_08_010
crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_19252
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_apsoil_2014_06_013
crossref_primary_10_4236_oje_2014_46028
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2014_05_002
Cites_doi 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01136.x
10.1038/379718a0
10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.002
10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.035
10.1890/08-1560.1
10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00889.x
10.2307/1942106
10.1017/S1464793105006950
10.1038/24376
10.1038/35099540
10.1073/pnas.0605127103
10.1890/04-0922
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x
10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.009
10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.133
10.1890/05-0549
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02753.x
10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5
10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00410.x
10.1006/mpev.2001.1007
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x
10.1126/science.147.3655.250
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x
10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01239.x
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02750.x
10.1017/S0953756201005196
10.1007/s00374-007-0231-9
10.1890/06-0822.1
10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x
10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01202.x
10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02921.x
10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01557.x
10.1128/AEM.69.5.2816-2824.2003
10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00127.x
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02920.x
10.1007/s10021-005-0110-x
10.1126/science.1071148
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01854.x
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x
10.1890/09-0336.1
10.1098/rstb.2007.2180
10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x
10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00841.x
10.1016/0167-8809(95)00609-V
10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00512.x
10.1023/A:1004891210871
10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[1164:STATCS]2.0.CO;2
10.1016/j.agee.2008.02.013
10.1016/j.mimet.2007.01.008
10.1186/1471-2105-10-171
10.1016/j.pedobi.2008.06.001
10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01169.x
10.1126/science.1143082
10.1007/s00572-003-0244-7
10.1007/s00572-007-0147-0
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x
10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1627:MSITAM]2.0.CO;2
10.1093/molbev/msm092
10.1038/nature01014
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01235.x
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03029.x
10.1007/s005720050235
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2010 New Phytologist Trust
The Authors (2010). Journal compilation © New Phytologist Trust (2010)
Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jun 2010
Copyright_xml – notice: 2010 New Phytologist Trust
– notice: The Authors (2010). Journal compilation © New Phytologist Trust (2010)
– notice: Copyright Wiley Subscription Services, Inc. Jun 2010
DBID FBQ
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7QO
7SN
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
M7N
P64
RC3
7X8
7S9
L.6
7ST
7U6
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
DatabaseName AGRIS
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Ecology Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Genetics Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Genetics Abstracts
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Technology Research Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
Engineering Research Database
Ecology Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
Environment Abstracts
Sustainability Science Abstracts
DatabaseTitleList Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic
Ecology Abstracts



AGRICOLA
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: FBQ
  name: AGRIS
  url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN
  sourceTypes: Publisher
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
Agriculture
EISSN 1469-8137
EndPage 979
ExternalDocumentID 20345633
10_1111_j_1469_8137_2010_03230_x
NPH3230
40661421
US201301840386
Genre article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GroupedDBID ---
-~X
.3N
.GA
.Y3
05W
0R~
10A
123
1OC
24P
29N
2WC
31~
33P
36B
3SF
4.4
50Y
50Z
51W
51X
52M
52N
52O
52P
52S
52T
52U
52W
52X
53G
5HH
5LA
5VS
66C
702
7PT
8-0
8-1
8-3
8-4
8-5
85S
8UM
930
A03
AAESR
AAEVG
AAHHS
AAHKG
AAISJ
AAKGQ
AANLZ
AAONW
AASGY
AASVR
AAXRX
AAZKR
ABBHK
ABCQN
ABCUV
ABEFU
ABEML
ABHUG
ABLJU
ABPLY
ABPTK
ABPVW
ABTLG
ABWRO
ACAHQ
ACCFJ
ACCZN
ACFBH
ACGFS
ACNCT
ACPOU
ACQPF
ACSCC
ACSTJ
ACXBN
ACXME
ACXQS
ADAWD
ADBBV
ADDAD
ADEOM
ADIZJ
ADKYN
ADMGS
ADOZA
ADULT
ADXAS
ADZLD
ADZMN
AEEZP
AEIGN
AEIMD
AENEX
AEQDE
AESBF
AEUPB
AEUQT
AEUYR
AFAZZ
AFBPY
AFEBI
AFFPM
AFGKR
AFMIJ
AFPWT
AFVGU
AFZJQ
AGJLS
AGUYK
AIURR
AIWBW
AJBDE
AJXKR
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AMBMR
AMYDB
AS~
ATUGU
AUFTA
AZBYB
AZVAB
BAFTC
BAWUL
BFHJK
BHBCM
BMNLL
BMXJE
BNHUX
BROTX
BRXPI
BY8
CAG
CBGCD
COF
CS3
CUYZI
CWIXF
D-E
D-F
DCZOG
DEVKO
DIK
DOOOF
DPXWK
DR2
DRFUL
DRSTM
DWIUU
E3Z
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
ESX
F00
F01
F04
F5P
FBQ
FIJ
G-S
G.N
GODZA
GTFYD
H.T
H.X
HF~
HGD
HQ2
HTVGU
HZI
HZ~
IHE
IPNFZ
IX1
J0M
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBS
JEB
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLS
JLXEF
JPM
JSODD
JST
K48
LATKE
LC2
LC3
LEEKS
LH4
LITHE
LOXES
LP6
LP7
LPU
LUTES
LW6
LW7
LYRES
MEWTI
MK4
MRFUL
MRSTM
MSFUL
MSSTM
MVM
MXFUL
MXSTM
N04
N05
N9A
NEJ
NF~
O66
O9-
OK1
P2P
P2W
P2X
P4D
Q.N
Q11
QB0
R.K
RCA
RIG
ROL
RX1
SA0
SUPJJ
TN5
TR2
UB1
W8V
W99
WBKPD
WHG
WIH
WIK
WIN
WNSPC
WOHZO
WQJ
WRC
WXSBR
WYISQ
XG1
XOL
YNT
YQT
YXE
ZCG
ZZTAW
~02
~IA
~KM
~WT
79B
AAHBH
AAHQN
AAMMB
AAMNL
AAYCA
ABSQW
ABVKB
ABXSQ
ACHIC
AEFGJ
AEYWJ
AFWVQ
AGXDD
AGYGG
AHBTC
AHXOZ
AIDQK
AIDYY
AILXY
AITYG
ALVPJ
AQVQM
HGLYW
IPSME
OIG
AAYXX
ABGDZ
ADXHL
AGHNM
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PKN
7QO
7SN
8FD
C1K
F1W
FR3
H95
L.G
M7N
P64
RC3
7X8
7S9
L.6
7ST
7U6
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c6220-be67e99072a8c5b78c0e28398df5b8826762883c1228a57ddf3d467b0e2dfc3f3
IEDL.DBID DR2
ISSN 0028-646X
1469-8137
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:29:31 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 16:24:22 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 19:21:13 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 10:39:22 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:27:59 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:02:05 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:09:02 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:56:50 EST 2025
Thu Jul 03 22:56:22 EDT 2025
Wed Dec 27 19:19:56 EST 2023
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
License http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6220-be67e99072a8c5b78c0e28398df5b8826762883c1228a57ddf3d467b0e2dfc3f3
Notes http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
PMID 20345633
PQID 2512282219
PQPubID 2026848
PageCount 12
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_745932180
proquest_miscellaneous_742702052
proquest_miscellaneous_733400090
proquest_journals_2512282219
pubmed_primary_20345633
crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2010_03230_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2010_03230_x
wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2010_03230_x_NPH3230
jstor_primary_40661421
fao_agris_US201301840386
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate June 2010
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2010-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2010
  text: June 2010
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Oxford, UK
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Oxford, UK
– name: England
– name: Lancaster
PublicationTitle The New phytologist
PublicationTitleAlternate New Phytol
PublicationYear 2010
Publisher Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Blackwell Publishing
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Oxford, UK : Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Blackwell Publishing
– name: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
– name: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
References 1965; 147
2000; 3
1954; 41
2004; 7
2003; 13
2007; 70
2006; 172
1998; 396
1993; 3
1998; 394
2001; 105
2009; 12
2008a; 44
2009; 10
2009; 97
2004; 36
2009; 90
2008b; 52
2007; 9
1995; 129
2005; 75
2005; 309
2008; 65
1996; 379
2007; 24
2007; 69
2001; 413
2007; 18
2006; 94
2002; 296
2009; 182
2007; 121
1995; 55
2006; 9
2006; 15
2008
2005; 42
2003; 37
2008; 127
2002; 418
2008; 11
2007; 95
1998; 138
1999; 8
2008; 363
2006; 113
2001; 21
2008; 180
2007; 316
2001; 230
1990; 115
2005; 165
2005; 122
2006; 87
2001; 4
2004; 14
2003; 69
2008; 45
2009; 184
1998; 7
2010; 91
2007; 44
2001; 36
2006; 103
e_1_2_6_51_1
e_1_2_6_53_1
e_1_2_6_32_1
e_1_2_6_30_1
e_1_2_6_19_1
e_1_2_6_13_1
e_1_2_6_36_1
e_1_2_6_59_1
e_1_2_6_11_1
e_1_2_6_34_1
e_1_2_6_15_1
Hammer O (e_1_2_6_17_1) 2001; 4
e_1_2_6_38_1
e_1_2_6_57_1
e_1_2_6_62_1
e_1_2_6_64_1
e_1_2_6_43_1
e_1_2_6_20_1
e_1_2_6_41_1
e_1_2_6_60_1
e_1_2_6_9_1
e_1_2_6_5_1
e_1_2_6_7_1
e_1_2_6_24_1
e_1_2_6_49_1
e_1_2_6_3_1
e_1_2_6_22_1
e_1_2_6_66_1
e_1_2_6_28_1
e_1_2_6_45_1
e_1_2_6_26_1
e_1_2_6_47_1
e_1_2_6_68_1
e_1_2_6_52_1
e_1_2_6_54_1
e_1_2_6_10_1
e_1_2_6_31_1
e_1_2_6_50_1
e_1_2_6_14_1
e_1_2_6_35_1
e_1_2_6_12_1
e_1_2_6_33_1
e_1_2_6_18_1
e_1_2_6_39_1
e_1_2_6_56_1
e_1_2_6_16_1
e_1_2_6_37_1
e_1_2_6_58_1
e_1_2_6_63_1
e_1_2_6_42_1
e_1_2_6_65_1
e_1_2_6_21_1
e_1_2_6_40_1
e_1_2_6_61_1
e_1_2_6_8_1
e_1_2_6_4_1
e_1_2_6_6_1
e_1_2_6_25_1
e_1_2_6_48_1
Smith SE (e_1_2_6_55_1) 2008
e_1_2_6_23_1
e_1_2_6_2_1
e_1_2_6_29_1
e_1_2_6_44_1
e_1_2_6_67_1
e_1_2_6_27_1
e_1_2_6_46_1
References_xml – volume: 36
  start-page: 203
  year: 2001
  end-page: 209
  article-title: Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising arable crops
  publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Ecology
– volume: 14
  start-page: 111
  year: 2004
  end-page: 117
  article-title: Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising roots of the grass species and in a field experiment
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
– volume: 309
  start-page: 570
  year: 2005
  end-page: 574
  article-title: Global consequences of land use
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 129
  start-page: 611
  year: 1995
  end-page: 618
  article-title: Functional compatibility in arbuscular mycorrhizas measured as hyphal P transport to the plant
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 121
  start-page: 233
  year: 2007
  end-page: 244
  article-title: Soil biodiversity for agricultural sustainability
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
– volume: 75
  start-page: 3
  year: 2005
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge
  publication-title: Ecological Monographs
– volume: 363
  start-page: 717
  year: 2008
  end-page: 739
  article-title: Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture
  publication-title: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
– volume: 172
  start-page: 554
  year: 2006
  end-page: 562
  article-title: Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 18
  start-page: 1
  year: 2007
  end-page: 14
  article-title: The cultivation bias: different communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi detected in roots from the field, from bait plants transplanted to the field, and from a greenhouse trap experiment
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
– volume: 3
  start-page: 73
  year: 2000
  end-page: 76
  article-title: Are communities saturated? On the relationship between alpha, beta and gamma diversity
  publication-title: Ecology Letters
– volume: 9
  start-page: 305
  year: 2006
  end-page: 316
  article-title: Global distributions of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  publication-title: Ecosystems
– volume: 10
  start-page: 10
  year: 2009
  article-title: T‐REX: software for the processing and analysis of T‐RFLP data
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
– volume: 91
  start-page: 1163
  year: 2010
  end-page: 1171
  article-title: Mycorrhizal fungi reduce nutrient loss from model grassland ecosystems
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 394
  start-page: 431
  year: 1998
  article-title: Ploughing up the wood‐wide web?
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 41
  start-page: 133
  year: 1954
  end-page: 145
  article-title: A distribution‐free Kappa‐sample test against ordered alternatives
  publication-title: Biometrika
– volume: 44
  start-page: 804
  year: 2007
  end-page: 812
  article-title: Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 52
  start-page: 119
  year: 2008b
  end-page: 125
  article-title: Screening of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal consortia developed from the rhizospheres of natural and cultivated tea plants for growth promotion in tea [ (L.) O. Kuntze]
  publication-title: Pedobiologia
– volume: 9
  start-page: 555
  year: 2007
  end-page: 559
  article-title: Residual polymerase activity‐induced bias in terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
  publication-title: Environmental Microbiology
– volume: 379
  start-page: 718
  year: 1996
  end-page: 720
  article-title: Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 413
  start-page: 723
  year: 2001
  end-page: 725
  article-title: Agri‐environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 165
  start-page: 273
  year: 2005
  end-page: 283
  article-title: Community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi at different soil depths in extensively and intensively managed agroecosystems
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 184
  start-page: 424
  year: 2009
  end-page: 437
  article-title: Large‐scale parallel 454 sequencing reveals host ecological group specificity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a boreonemoral forest
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 13
  start-page: 1164
  year: 2003
  end-page: 1176
  article-title: Soil tillage affects the community structure of mycorrhizal fungi in maize roots
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 138
  start-page: 131
  year: 1998
  end-page: 142
  article-title: The arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of – II. Seasonal and spatial patterns of fungal populations
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 37
  start-page: 1
  year: 2003
  end-page: 16
  article-title: The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility
  publication-title: Biology and Fertility of Soils
– year: 2008
– volume: 147
  start-page: 250
  year: 1965
  end-page: 260
  article-title: Dominance and diversity in land plant communities – numerical relations of species express importance of competition in community function and evolution
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 65
  start-page: 323
  year: 2008
  end-page: 338
  article-title: Community analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and bacteria in the maize mycorrhizosphere in a long‐term fertilization trial
  publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Ecology
– volume: 45
  start-page: 141
  year: 2008
  end-page: 150
  article-title: Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan‐European study
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 69
  start-page: 411
  year: 2007
  end-page: 413
  article-title: REMA: a computer‐based mapping tool for analysis of restriction sites in multiple DNA sequences
  publication-title: Journal of Microbiological Methods
– volume: 90
  start-page: 2567
  year: 2009
  end-page: 2576
  article-title: Community‐level consequences of mycorrhizae depend on phosphorus availability
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 296
  start-page: 1694
  year: 2002
  end-page: 1697
  article-title: Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 418
  start-page: 671
  year: 2002
  end-page: 677
  article-title: Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 3
  start-page: 749
  year: 1993
  end-page: 757
  article-title: Can fertilization of soil select less mutualistic mycorrhizae?
  publication-title: Ecological Applications
– volume: 70
  start-page: 200
  year: 2007
  end-page: 204
  article-title: Evaluation of LSU rRNA‐gene PCR primers for analysis of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities via terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Microbiological Methods
– volume: 42
  start-page: 261
  year: 2005
  end-page: 269
  article-title: The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta‐analysis
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Ecology
– volume: 182
  start-page: 347
  year: 2009
  end-page: 358
  article-title: More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 12
  start-page: 452
  year: 2009
  end-page: 461
  article-title: Soil aggregation and carbon sequestration are tightly correlated with the abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: results from long‐term field experiments
  publication-title: Ecology Letters
– volume: 122
  start-page: 113
  year: 2005
  end-page: 130
  article-title: Does organic farming benefit biodiversity?
  publication-title: Biological Conservation
– volume: 75
  start-page: 435
  year: 2005
  end-page: 450
  article-title: Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data
  publication-title: Ecological Monographs
– volume: 103
  start-page: 12115
  year: 2006
  end-page: 12120
  article-title: Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA
– volume: 8
  start-page: 203
  year: 1999
  end-page: 206
  article-title: Visualization of ribosomal DNA loci in spore interphasic nuclei of glomalean fungi by fluorescence hybridization
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
– volume: 113
  start-page: 17
  year: 2006
  end-page: 35
  article-title: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and organic farming
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
– volume: 36
  start-page: 1785
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1792
  article-title: Microbial and biochemical soil quality indicators and their potential for differentiating areas under contrasting agricultural management regimes
  publication-title: Soil Biology & Biochemistry
– volume: 87
  start-page: 1627
  year: 2006
  end-page: 1636
  article-title: Mutualistic stability in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: exploring hypotheses of evolutionary cooperation
  publication-title: Ecology
– volume: 396
  start-page: 262
  year: 1998
  end-page: 265
  article-title: Legume‐based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 69
  start-page: 2816
  year: 2003
  end-page: 2824
  article-title: Impact of land use intensity on the species diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in agroecosystems of Central Europe
  publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology
– volume: 105
  start-page: 1413
  year: 2001
  end-page: 1421
  article-title: A new fungal phylum, the Glomeromycota: phylogeny and evolution
  publication-title: Mycological Research
– volume: 396
  start-page: 69
  year: 1998
  end-page: 72
  article-title: Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 127
  start-page: 7
  year: 2008
  end-page: 21
  article-title: Functional biodiversity: an agroecosystem approach
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
– volume: 115
  start-page: 495
  year: 1990
  end-page: 501
  article-title: A new method which gives an objective measure of colonization of roots by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 182
  start-page: 495
  year: 2009
  end-page: 506
  article-title: sp nov: molecular ecology and phylotaxonomy of an inconspicuous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 7
  start-page: 879
  year: 1998
  end-page: 887
  article-title: Characterization of root colonization profiles by a microcosm community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi using 25S rDNA‐targeted nested PCR
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 55
  start-page: 201
  year: 1995
  end-page: 212
  article-title: The impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity
  publication-title: Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
– volume: 180
  start-page: 673
  year: 2008
  end-page: 683
  article-title: Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty‐three Chinese temperate tree species
  publication-title: New Phytologist
– volume: 21
  start-page: 190
  year: 2001
  end-page: 197
  article-title: , the largest genus of the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (Glomales), is nonmonophyletic
  publication-title: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
– volume: 11
  start-page: 296
  year: 2008
  end-page: 310
  article-title: The unseen majority: soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems
  publication-title: Ecology Letters
– volume: 230
  start-page: 87
  year: 2001
  end-page: 97
  article-title: Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil
  publication-title: Plant and Soil
– volume: 94
  start-page: 778
  year: 2006
  end-page: 790
  article-title: Composition of root‐colonizing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in different ecosystems around the globe
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 24
  start-page: 1596
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1599
  article-title: MEGA4: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0
  publication-title: Molecular Biology and Evolution
– volume: 44
  start-page: 491
  year: 2008a
  end-page: 500
  article-title: Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with the rhizosphere of tea growing in ‘natural’ and ‘cultivated’ ecosites
  publication-title: Biology and Fertility of Soils
– volume: 316
  start-page: 1746
  year: 2007
  end-page: 1748
  article-title: Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning
  publication-title: Science
– volume: 95
  start-page: 623
  year: 2007
  end-page: 630
  article-title: Specificity and resilience in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi of a natural woodland community
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 97
  start-page: 1274
  year: 2009
  end-page: 1280
  article-title: Plant and fungal identity determines pathogen protection of plant roots by arbuscular mycorrhizas
  publication-title: Journal of Ecology
– volume: 4
  start-page: 9
  year: 2001
  end-page: 17
  article-title: PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis
  publication-title: Palaeontologia Electronica
– volume: 15
  start-page: 2277
  year: 2006
  end-page: 2289
  article-title: Communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in arable soils are not necessarily low in diversity
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 1
  year: 2004
  end-page: 15
  article-title: A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity
  publication-title: Ecology Letters
– ident: e_1_2_6_45_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2006.01136.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_61_1
  doi: 10.1038/379718a0
– ident: e_1_2_6_41_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.04.002
– ident: e_1_2_6_3_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.04.035
– ident: e_1_2_6_8_1
  doi: 10.1890/08-1560.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_39_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00889.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_29_1
  doi: 10.2307/1942106
– ident: e_1_2_6_12_1
  doi: 10.1017/S1464793105006950
– ident: e_1_2_6_11_1
  doi: 10.1038/24376
– ident: e_1_2_6_32_1
  doi: 10.1038/35099540
– ident: e_1_2_6_56_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605127103
– ident: e_1_2_6_26_1
  doi: 10.1890/04-0922
– ident: e_1_2_6_16_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_4_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_15_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.09.009
– ident: e_1_2_6_30_1
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.133
– ident: e_1_2_6_33_1
  doi: 10.1890/05-0549
– ident: e_1_2_6_54_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02753.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_28_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5
– ident: e_1_2_6_65_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00410.x
– volume-title: Mycorrhizal symbiosis, 3rd edn
  year: 2008
  ident: e_1_2_6_55_1
– ident: e_1_2_6_49_1
  doi: 10.1006/mpev.2001.1007
– ident: e_1_2_6_47_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_67_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.147.3655.250
– ident: e_1_2_6_5_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_23_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01239.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_13_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02750.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_48_1
  doi: 10.1017/S0953756201005196
– ident: e_1_2_6_52_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00374-007-0231-9
– ident: e_1_2_6_21_1
  doi: 10.1890/06-0822.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_25_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
– ident: e_1_2_6_20_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01139.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_6_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.12.013
– ident: e_1_2_6_22_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01202.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_24_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02921.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_51_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01557.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_42_1
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2816-2824.2003
– ident: e_1_2_6_34_1
  doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00127.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_44_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02920.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_63_1
  doi: 10.1007/s10021-005-0110-x
– ident: e_1_2_6_35_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1071148
– ident: e_1_2_6_66_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01854.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_37_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00476.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_19_1
  doi: 10.1890/09-0336.1
– ident: e_1_2_6_50_1
  doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2180
– ident: e_1_2_6_68_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01303.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_10_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00841.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_38_1
  doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(95)00609-V
– ident: e_1_2_6_62_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00512.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_2_1
  doi: 10.1023/A:1004891210871
– ident: e_1_2_6_27_1
  doi: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)13[1164:STATCS]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_40_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.02.013
– ident: e_1_2_6_58_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2007.01.008
– ident: e_1_2_6_9_1
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-171
– volume: 4
  start-page: 9
  year: 2001
  ident: e_1_2_6_17_1
  article-title: PAST: Palaeontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis
  publication-title: Palaeontologia Electronica
– ident: e_1_2_6_53_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2008.06.001
– ident: e_1_2_6_18_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01169.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_36_1
  doi: 10.1126/science.1143082
– ident: e_1_2_6_14_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-003-0244-7
– ident: e_1_2_6_57_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-007-0147-0
– ident: e_1_2_6_7_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_31_1
  doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1627:MSITAM]2.0.CO;2
– ident: e_1_2_6_59_1
  doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092
– ident: e_1_2_6_60_1
  doi: 10.1038/nature01014
– ident: e_1_2_6_43_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01235.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_46_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03029.x
– ident: e_1_2_6_64_1
  doi: 10.1007/s005720050235
SSID ssj0009562
Score 2.4707174
Snippet The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood,...
The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) is still poorly understood,...
Summary • The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly...
*The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood,...
• The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly understood,...
Summary; The impact of various agricultural practices on soil biodiversity and, in particular, on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), is still poorly...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
jstor
fao
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 968
SubjectTerms Agricultural ecosystems
Agricultural land
Agricultural management
Agricultural practices
agricultural soils
Agriculture
Agriculture - methods
Agroecosystems
analysis
Arable land
arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
below-ground mutualism
Biodiversity
Community composition
community structure
Composition
Corn
Crop management
Crop rotation
Crops, Agricultural
Crops, Agricultural - growth & development
Crops, Agricultural - microbiology
Ecological sustainability
Ecosystem
Ecosystem management
Ecosystems
Fields
Fingerprinting
fungal communities
Fungi
Grasslands
growth & development
methods
microbiology
Mycorrhizae
Mycorrhizae - physiology
mycorrhizal fungi
organic agriculture
Organic farming
Organic foods
organic production
physiology
Plants
Poaceae
Poaceae - microbiology
Polymorphism
Principal Component Analysis
Restoration
Restriction fragment length polymorphism
Sandy soils
Soil
Soil - analysis
soil biodiversity
Soil Microbiology
species diversity
Species Specificity
Strategic management
Sustainable agriculture
Symbiosis
Symbiosis - physiology
terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP)
Time Factors
β-diversity
Title Positive effects of organic farming on below-ground mutualists: large-scale comparison of mycorrhizal fungal communities in agricultural soils
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/40661421
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8137.2010.03230.x
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20345633
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2512282219
https://www.proquest.com/docview/733400090
https://www.proquest.com/docview/742702052
https://www.proquest.com/docview/745932180
Volume 186
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELag4sCFd2mgIB-4ZpXYiZ1wA0S1QqKqgJX2ZvlZVt0maLMLtCd-AuIn8kuYyUtsVVUV4hYptmVPxp5vnG9mCHlhsyLJbclibXUZYwr0WOvUx9LaUFjpCt3ed7w_FNNZ9m6ez3v-E8bCdPkhxgs33BnteY0bXJvm4ibHKywue4YWBzg9QTyJ1C3ERx_YX_l3BRsSMotMzLdJPZcOtGWpbgZdD5TFy8DoNrZtjdPBXXIyLKvjpJxMNmszsecXMj7-n3XfI3d6DEtfdUp3n9zw1QNy63UNOPPsIfl11PLAvnrac0VoHWhXPMrSoJF7c0zrihq_rL_9_vET40oqR083GMkCSte8pEukp8OrBhTIUzuWSsSRTs_AX159XpzDDMAog4HDBhjkgqlh6aKi-ng1JhShTb1YNo_I7ODtpzfTuK_8EFvBwJ81XkgPdlIyXdjcyMImHnBQWbiQG_AJhGyrJNuUsULn0rnAHZz4Blq5YHngu2Snqiu_R2iuHfhoPhjJZeasNRaZrdLzoJMAACYicvjKyvZp0bE6x1JtuUelQoErFLhqBa6-RyQde37pUoNco88eKJJCQTRq9pHhf2P0sXkhIrLbatc4FkAtwE4sjcj-oG6qP2AahbAUGcBpGRE6voajAf_36MrXm0ZJzjNU_eSKJhnGIyY5u6pJDhg_LWCUx52ujzNkCQf8zXlERKux1xaDOjya4tOTf-34lNzuaBx4HbZPdtarjX8G6HBtnrf7_g8i3lYF
linkProvider Wiley-Blackwell
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3NbtQwELagIMGF_9JAAR-4ZpXYSZxwA0S1QLuqoCvtzXIcu6xIk2qzW2hPPALiEXkSZpwfsVVVVYhbpNhWMhmPv5l8M0PISx2lQawz5iutMh9LoPtKhcYXWttUiyJVLt6xN0nG0-jDLJ517YAwF6atDzEE3HBnOHuNGxwD0ud3OcawuOgoWhzw9AgA5Q1s8O38q0_srwq8CetLMidRMlun9Vy40tpZdd2quictXgRH19GtO5527pKyf7GWlfJ1tFrmI312rubjf3rze-ROB2Pp61bv7pNrpnpAbr6pAWqePiS_9h0V7MTQji5Ca0vb_lGaWoX0m0NaVzQ3Zf3t94-fmFpSFfRohcksoHfNK1oiQx1uNaBDhuqhWyKudHQKLvPiy_wMngDOZTjjcADmuWB1WDqvqDpcDDVFaFPPy-YRme68O3g79rvmD75OGLi0uUmEgaNSMJXqOBepDgxAoSwtbJyDW5AI1yhZh4ylKhZFYXkBRj-HUYXV3PJNslHVldkiNFYFuGnG5oKLqNA610huFYZbFVjAMB4R_WeWuquMjg06SrnmIWUSBS5R4NIJXH73SDjMPG6rg1xhzhZokkRBNHL6meGvY3SzeZp4ZNOp17AWoC2ATyz0yHavb7KzMY1EZIok4DDzCB1ug3XAXz6qMvWqkYLzCHU_uGRIhCmJQcwuGxIDzA9TWOVxq-zDE7KAAwTn3COJU9kri0FO9sd49eRfJ74gt8YHe7ty9_3k41Nyu2V1YHRsm2wsFyvzDMDiMn_ujMAfbHBaIA
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagIMSFd2mggA9cs0rsJE64AWW1vFYrYKW9WY4f7arbpNrsAu2Jn4D4ifwSZvISW1VVhbhFim0lk_HMN843M4Q811EaxDpjvtIq87EEuq9UaH2htUu1MKmqzzs-jpPRNHo3i2ct_wlzYZr6EP2BG-6M2l7jBj827uwmxyMsLlqGFgc4PQA8eS1KghQ1fO8T-6sAb8K6isxJlMw2WT3nrrThqq46VXacxfPQ6Ca4rb3T8DY57N6rIaUcDtarfKBPz5R8_D8vfofcakEsfdlo3V1yxRb3yPVXJQDNk_vk16Qmgn21tCWL0NLRpnuUpk4h-WaflgXN7aL89vvHT0wsKQw9WmMqC2hd9YIukJ8OtyrQIEt13ysRVzo6gYB5eTA_hScArwweDgdglgvWhqXzgqr9ZV9RhFblfFE9INPhmy-vR37b-sHXCYOANreJsOAoBVOpjnOR6sACEMpS4-IcgoJE1G2SdchYqmJhjOMGTH4Oo4zT3PFtslWUhd0hNFYGgjTrcsFFZLTONVJbheVOBQ4QjEdE95WlbuuiY3uOhdyIjzKJApcocFkLXH73SNjPPG5qg1xizg4okkRBVHL6meGPYwyyeZp4ZLvWrn4twFoAnljokd1O3WRrYSqJuBQpwGHmEdrfBtuAP3xUYct1JQXnEap-cMGQCBMSg5hdNCQGkB-msMrDRtf7J2QBBwDOuUeSWmMvLQY5nozw6tG_TnxGbkz2hvLD2_H7x-RmQ-nAo7FdsrVaru0TQIqr_GltAv4AJ3hY2A
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Positive+effects+of+organic+farming+on+below-ground+mutualists%3A+large-scale+comparison+of+mycorrhizal+fungal+communities+in+agricultural+soils&rft.jtitle=The+New+phytologist&rft.au=Verbruggen%2C+Erik&rft.au=R%C3%B6ling%2C+Wilfred+F.M.&rft.au=Gamper%2C+Hannes+A&rft.au=Kowalchuk%2C+George+A&rft.date=2010-06-01&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.volume=186&rft.issue=4+p.968-979&rft.spage=968&rft.epage=979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8137.2010.03230.x&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon