Above-ground space sequestration determines competitive success in juvenile beech and spruce trees
$\bullet$ A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of re...
Saved in:
Published in | The New phytologist Vol. 167; no. 1; pp. 181 - 196 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford, UK
Blackwell Science
01.07.2005
Blackwell Science Ltd Blackwell |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | $\bullet$ A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. $\bullet$ Ambient and elevated CO2 and ozone (O3) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. $\bullet$ Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. $\bullet$ Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. |
---|---|
AbstractList | $\bullet$ A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. $\bullet$ Ambient and elevated CO2 and ozone (O3) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. $\bullet$ Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. $\bullet$ Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. Summary • A 2‐yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra‐ and inter‐specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. • Ambient and elevated CO2 and ozone (O3) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. • Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above‐ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. • Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size‐independent readjustment of above‐ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above‐ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. Ambient and elevated CO(2) and ozone (O(3)) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. A 2‐yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra‐ and inter‐specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) and spruce ( Picea abies ). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. Ambient and elevated CO 2 and ozone (O 3 ) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above‐ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size‐independent readjustment of above‐ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above‐ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. Ambient and elevated CO(2) and ozone (O(3)) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness.A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. Ambient and elevated CO(2) and ozone (O(3)) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea abies). Competitiveness was analysed by quantifying the resource budgets that occur along structures and within occupied space of relevance for competitive interaction. Ambient and elevated CO sub(2) and ozone (O sub(3)) regimes were applied throughout two growing seasons as stressors for provoking changes in resource budgets, growth and allocation to facilitate the competition analysis. The hypothesis tested was that the ability to sequester space at low structural cost will determine the competitive success. Spruce was a stronger competitor than beech, as displayed by its higher above-ground biomass increments in mixed culture compared with monoculture. A crucial factor in the competitive success of spruce was its ability to enlarge crown volume at low structural costs, supporting the hypothesis. Interspecific competition with spruce resulted in a size-independent readjustment of above-ground allocation in beech (reduced leaf : shoot biomass ratio). The efficient use of resources for above-ground space sequestration proved to be a parameter that quantitatively reflects competitiveness. |
Author | Gottlein, A Blaschke, H Winkler, J.B Kozovits, A.R Matyssek, R Grams, T.E.E |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Kozovits, A.R – sequence: 2 fullname: Matyssek, R – sequence: 3 fullname: Winkler, J.B – sequence: 4 fullname: Gottlein, A – sequence: 5 fullname: Blaschke, H – sequence: 6 fullname: Grams, T.E.E |
BackLink | http://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16849667$$DView record in Pascal Francis https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948841$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkk9v1DAQxS1URLeFb4AgF7gl-F8c-wBSVQFFqgAJKnGzbGdSHGWTrZ0s7bfH2SyLxGXxxZbm95418-YMnfRDDwhlBBcknTdtQbhQuSSsKijGZYEJU6S4f4RWh8IJWmFMZS64-HGKzmJsMcaqFPQJOiWl4lJyskL2wg5byG_DMPV1FjfGQRbhboI4BjP6oc9qGCGsfQ8xc8N6A6Mf_TZBk3MQY-b7rJ220PsOMgvgfmZmZxSm5DQGgPgUPW5MF-HZ_j5HNx_ef7-8yq-_fPx0eXGdO0Exya2xjDoJitrG1kxIUWNggljKqZLEmcoRixXHJQhbidQM46ZWRNqyto0x7By9Xnw3Ydg1oNc-Oug608MwRS0qRUvKyVGQC6EUpvwoSCqCcYVVAl_swcmuodab4NcmPOg_c07Aqz1gojNdE0zvfPzLCcmVEFXi3i2cC0OMARrt_LjLIcXhO02wnhdAt3rOWc8563kB9G4B9H0ykP8YHP44Ln27SH-lLB_-W6c_f72aX0n_fNG3cRzCQc-E4ozNM3q5lBszaHMbUvs331LwDKchSsJL9huG1dqj |
CODEN | NEPHAV |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s10342_020_01264_w crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2005_872981 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2014_07_034 crossref_primary_10_1002_ecy_1567 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_revpalbo_2012_07_018 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2005_872902 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2007_964883 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_009_9936_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s11267_007_9164_4 crossref_primary_10_1093_treephys_tpw132 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2014_08_022 crossref_primary_10_3390_f11030317 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2006_923979 crossref_primary_10_1111_plb_12068 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envexpbot_2007_08_008 crossref_primary_10_1086_679349 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_013_0922_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_013_0923_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11270_015_2715_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_019_03968_4 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2009_11_033 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_soilbio_2009_07_002 crossref_primary_10_1674_0003_0031_172_2_266 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10342_021_01405_9 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_2486_2005_00993_x crossref_primary_10_5194_bg_8_3127_2011 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_006_0107_x crossref_primary_10_1007_s00468_008_0255_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2008_09_016 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_gecco_2020_e01311 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_envpol_2009_08_037 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_2005_872972 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0105600 crossref_primary_10_11118_actaun201159010293 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13717_018_0142_8 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_009_9945_9 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tree_2007_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1080_15226514_2015_1115961 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1365_3040_2007_01696_x crossref_primary_10_1080_07352680902776572 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10342_008_0221_y crossref_primary_10_1007_s00442_005_0146_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10265_018_1009_x crossref_primary_10_1016_j_flora_2007_09_001 crossref_primary_10_1111_nph_14026 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11104_009_9968_2 |
Cites_doi | 10.1093/jxb/50.330.29 10.1038/35081062 10.1007/BF00384469 10.1007/BF02340773 10.1007/s00442-002-0937-1 10.1093/jxb/50.340.1629 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00276.x 10.1023/A:1004384909535 10.1006/anbo.1996.0388 10.1093/treephys/24.9.1045 10.1007/BF00384257 10.1023/A:1004755404412 10.1055/s-2002-25742 10.1016/B978-0-12-294452-9.50008-4 10.2307/1940647 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01015.x 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00742.x 10.1007/BF01816820 10.1016/B978-0-12-155070-7.50009-3 10.1055/s-2002-25729 10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_5 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03966.x 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x 10.1139/x95-119 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00221.x 10.1079/9780851995519.0147 10.1093/jxb/50.330.15 10.1006/anbo.1995.1019 10.1002/9781444313765 10.1002/1522-2624(200102)164:1<35::AID-JPLN35>3.0.CO;2-M 10.1093/treephys/22.12.885 10.1016/B978-012083490-7/50002-5 10.1093/treephys/17.12.777 10.1007/BF00378296 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11604091 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1118:EATQII]2.0.CO;2 10.1007/BF00367075 10.2307/2390505 10.1006/anbo.1996.0063 10.1023/A:1004823132574 10.1007/s00468-002-0179-1 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80279-3 10.2307/2390260 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00167.x 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00993.x 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001521 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00674.x 10.1078/1433-8319-00007 10.1006/anbo.1996.0140 10.1006/anbo.1996.0006 10.1007/BF02832979 10.1007/BF00379965 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00225-1 10.1007/978-3-662-05214-3 10.1007/BF02257566 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2004 New Phytologist 2005 INIST-CNRS |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2004 New Phytologist – notice: 2005 INIST-CNRS |
DBID | FBQ AAYXX CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7SN C1K 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01391.x |
DatabaseName | AGRIS CrossRef Pascal-Francis Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Ecology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Ecology Abstracts Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management AGRICOLA AGRICOLA - Academic MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE CrossRef MEDLINE - Academic Ecology Abstracts |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: FBQ name: AGRIS url: http://www.fao.org/agris/Centre.asp?Menu_1ID=DB&Menu_2ID=DB1&Language=EN&Content=http://www.fao.org/agris/search?Language=EN sourceTypes: Publisher |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Botany |
EISSN | 1469-8137 |
EndPage | 196 |
ExternalDocumentID | 15948841 16849667 10_1111_j_1469_8137_2005_01391_x NPH1391 3694339 US201301008145 |
Genre | article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- -~X .3N .GA .Y3 05W 0R~ 10A 123 1OC 24P 29N 2WC 31~ 33P 36B 3SF 4.4 50Y 50Z 51W 51X 52M 52N 52O 52P 52S 52T 52U 52W 52X 53G 5HH 5LA 5VS 66C 702 7PT 8-0 8-1 8-3 8-4 8-5 85S 8UM 930 A03 AAESR AAEVG AAHHS AAHKG AAISJ AAKGQ AANLZ AAONW AASGY AASVR AAXRX AAZKR ABBHK ABCQN ABCUV ABEFU ABEML ABHUG ABLJU ABPLY ABPTK ABPVW ABTLG ABWRO ACAHQ ACCFJ ACCZN ACFBH ACGFS ACNCT ACPOU ACQPF ACSCC ACSTJ ACXBN ACXME ACXQS ADAWD ADBBV ADDAD ADEOM ADIZJ ADKYN ADMGS ADOZA ADULT ADXAS ADZLD ADZMN AEEZP AEIGN AEIMD AENEX AEQDE AESBF AEUPB AEUQT AEUYR AFAZZ AFBPY AFEBI AFFPM AFGKR AFMIJ AFPWT AFVGU AFZJQ AGJLS AGUYK AIURR AIWBW AJBDE AJXKR ALAGY ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS ALUQN AMBMR AMYDB AS~ ATUGU AUFTA AZBYB AZVAB BAFTC BAWUL BFHJK BHBCM BMNLL BMXJE BNHUX BROTX BRXPI BY8 CAG CBGCD COF CS3 CUYZI CWIXF D-E D-F DCZOG DEVKO DIK DOOOF DPXWK DR2 DRFUL DRSTM DWIUU E3Z EBS ECGQY EJD ESX F00 F01 F04 F5P FBQ FIJ G-S G.N GODZA GTFYD H.T H.X HF~ HGD HQ2 HTVGU HZI HZ~ IHE IPNFZ IX1 J0M JAAYA JBMMH JBS JEB JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLS JLXEF JPM JSODD JST K48 LATKE LC2 LC3 LEEKS LH4 LITHE LOXES LP6 LP7 LPU LUTES LW6 LW7 LYRES MEWTI MK4 MRFUL MRSTM MSFUL MSSTM MVM MXFUL MXSTM N04 N05 N9A NEJ NF~ O66 O9- OK1 P2P P2W P2X P4D Q.N Q11 QB0 R.K RCA RIG ROL RX1 SA0 SUPJJ TN5 TR2 UB1 W8V W99 WBKPD WHG WIH WIK WIN WNSPC WOHZO WQJ WRC WXSBR WYISQ XG1 XOL YNT YQT YXE ZCG ZZTAW ~02 ~IA ~KM ~WT 79B AAHBH AAHQN AAMMB AAMNL AAYCA ABSQW ABVKB ABXSQ ACHIC AEFGJ AEYWJ AFWVQ AGXDD AGYGG AHBTC AHXOZ AIDQK AIDYY AILXY AITYG ALVPJ AQVQM HGLYW IPSME OIG AAYXX ABGDZ ADXHL AGHNM CITATION IQODW CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PKN 7SN C1K 7S9 L.6 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c6201-bab32c8e92bfbd3686d0e361b242981ca7c1b09405e6b7600034ad918b5dbfaa3 |
IEDL.DBID | DR2 |
ISSN | 0028-646X |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 01:12:19 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:48:55 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:07:29 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:41:56 EST 2025 Mon Jul 21 09:14:12 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:20:40 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:24 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 22 17:02:52 EST 2025 Thu Jul 03 22:54:18 EDT 2025 Wed Dec 27 19:09:38 EST 2023 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Picea abies (spruce) Growth Resource allocation Carbon dioxide competition Biomass Allometry Medium enrichment elevated carbon dioxide Dicotyledones ozone (O3) Angiospermae Softwood forest tree Gymnospermae Interspecific competition Hardwood forest tree Ozone Fagaceae Stress cost-benefit relations Fagus sylvatica (beech) Intraspecific competition Coniferales Spermatophyta resource investment Picea abies Interspecific relation Fagus sylvatica |
Language | English |
License | http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor CC BY 4.0 |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6201-bab32c8e92bfbd3686d0e361b242981ca7c1b09405e6b7600034ad918b5dbfaa3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01391.x |
PMID | 15948841 |
PQID | 17100709 |
PQPubID | 23462 |
PageCount | 16 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_67925241 proquest_miscellaneous_46699024 proquest_miscellaneous_17100709 pubmed_primary_15948841 pascalfrancis_primary_16849667 crossref_citationtrail_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2005_01391_x crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2005_01391_x wiley_primary_10_1111_j_1469_8137_2005_01391_x_NPH1391 jstor_primary_3694339 fao_agris_US201301008145 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | July 2005 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2005-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2005 text: July 2005 |
PublicationDecade | 2000 |
PublicationPlace | Oxford, UK |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Oxford, UK – name: Oxford – name: England |
PublicationTitle | The New phytologist |
PublicationTitleAlternate | New Phytol |
PublicationYear | 2005 |
Publisher | Blackwell Science Blackwell Science Ltd Blackwell |
Publisher_xml | – name: Blackwell Science – name: Blackwell Science Ltd – name: Blackwell |
References | 2002; 16 1995; 75 1987; 1 1987; 74 2000; 3 2000; 3/2 1984; 65 2004; 24 1995; 76 1988; 76 1998; 117 1996; 185 2001; 229 1998; 199 1985; 66 1996; 148 2003; 157 1996; 78 1996; 77 2003; 91 1990 2001 2000 1994.; 16 1995; 25 1981; 153 1986 1997; 17 1999; 50 2001; 411 1987; 10 2001; 164 2002; 132 1997 1996 2002; 4 1950 2005 1994 1993 2003 1998; 139 1999; 5 1996; 10 2001; 157 1993; 13 1994; 127 1991; 22 1997; 79 2001; 8 2002; 22 2003; 26 2000; 222 2001; 115 1998; 140 e_1_2_7_3_1 e_1_2_7_9_1 e_1_2_7_19_1 Payer H‐D (e_1_2_7_49_1) 1993 e_1_2_7_60_1 e_1_2_7_17_1 e_1_2_7_62_1 e_1_2_7_15_1 e_1_2_7_41_1 e_1_2_7_64_1 e_1_2_7_13_1 e_1_2_7_11_1 e_1_2_7_45_1 e_1_2_7_47_1 e_1_2_7_26_1 e_1_2_7_28_1 e_1_2_7_50_1 e_1_2_7_25_1 e_1_2_7_52_1 e_1_2_7_33_1 e_1_2_7_21_1 e_1_2_7_35_1 e_1_2_7_56_1 e_1_2_7_37_1 e_1_2_7_58_1 e_1_2_7_39_1 Bauer G (e_1_2_7_7_1) 1997 Ballaré CL (e_1_2_7_5_1) 1987; 10 e_1_2_7_6_1 Hoagland DR (e_1_2_7_31_1) 1950 e_1_2_7_4_1 e_1_2_7_8_1 Schulze E‐D (e_1_2_7_54_1) 1986 e_1_2_7_18_1 e_1_2_7_16_1 e_1_2_7_40_1 e_1_2_7_61_1 e_1_2_7_2_1 e_1_2_7_42_1 e_1_2_7_63_1 e_1_2_7_12_1 e_1_2_7_44_1 e_1_2_7_65_1 e_1_2_7_10_1 e_1_2_7_46_1 Fuhrer J (e_1_2_7_23_1) 1994 e_1_2_7_27_1 e_1_2_7_29_1 Lide DR (e_1_2_7_43_1) 2003 Nüßlein S (e_1_2_7_48_1) 1993; 13 e_1_2_7_51_1 e_1_2_7_30_1 e_1_2_7_53_1 e_1_2_7_24_1 e_1_2_7_32_1 e_1_2_7_55_1 e_1_2_7_22_1 e_1_2_7_34_1 e_1_2_7_57_1 e_1_2_7_20_1 e_1_2_7_36_1 e_1_2_7_59_1 Bühl A (e_1_2_7_14_1) 2000 e_1_2_7_38_1 |
References_xml | – volume: 5 start-page: 807 year: 1999 end-page: 837 article-title: Elevated CO and plant structure: a review publication-title: Global Change Biology – start-page: 585 year: 1986 end-page: 602 – volume: 76 start-page: 262 year: 1995 end-page: 271 article-title: Plant architecture and allocation in different neighborhoods: implications for competitive success publication-title: Ecology – year: 2005 – volume: 8 start-page: 147 year: 2001 end-page: 191 – volume: 10 start-page: 708 year: 1996 end-page: 716 article-title: Effects of CO concentration and water availability on growth and gas exchange in greenhouse‐grown miniature stands of loblolly pine and red maple publication-title: Functional Ecology – volume: 10 start-page: 551 year: 1987 end-page: 557 article-title: Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight publication-title: Plant, Cell & Environment – year: 2001 – volume: 411 start-page: 792 year: 2001 end-page: 795 article-title: Proximity signal and shade avoidance differences between early and late successional trees publication-title: Nature – volume: 139 start-page: 395 year: 1998 end-page: 436 article-title: Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO atmosphere publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 10 start-page: 277 year: 1996 end-page: 287 article-title: A model of the gas exchange response of to habitat conditions publication-title: Trees – volume: 3 start-page: 423 year: 2000 end-page: 432 article-title: On detecting and measuring competition in spatially structured plant communities publication-title: Ecology Letters – volume: 22 start-page: 309 year: 1991 end-page: 334 article-title: The theory and practice of branch autonomy publication-title: Annual of Review of Ecology and Systematics – start-page: 127 year: 1993 end-page: 145 – year: 1990 – volume: 91 start-page: 4 year: 2003 end-page: 17 article-title: Carbon limitation in trees publication-title: Journal of Ecology – volume: 16 start-page: 423 year: 2002 end-page: 436 article-title: Four‐year growth dynamics of beech–spruce model ecosystems under CO enrichment on two different forest soils publication-title: Trees – start-page: 111 year: 1994 end-page: 144 – volume: 74 start-page: 536 year: 1987 end-page: 547 article-title: Hecken: Ein Modellfall für die Parterschaft von Physiologie und Morphologie bei der pflanzlichen Produktion in Konkurrenzsituationen publication-title: Naturwissenschaften – volume: 77 start-page: 529 year: 1996 end-page: 537 article-title: Allometry and competition between saplings of and in a sub‐boreal coniferous forest, northern Japan publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 78 start-page: 437 year: 1996 end-page: 447 article-title: Crown architecture and species coexistence in plant communities publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 76 start-page: 288 year: 1988 end-page: 293 article-title: Morphological responses of L. seedlings to the presence of neighbors: their relationships with canopy microclimate publication-title: Oecologia – year: 1997 – volume: 1 start-page: 225 year: 1987 end-page: 231 article-title: Heterosis in hybrid larch ( × ). II: growth characteristics publication-title: Trees – volume: 117 start-page: 241 year: 1998 end-page: 257 article-title: The mixed spruce‐beech forest stands of the ‘Sonderforschungsbereich’‘Growth or Parasite Defence?’ in the forest district Kranzberger Forst publication-title: Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt – volume: 222 start-page: 149 year: 2000 end-page: 161 article-title: solution chemistry in the rhizosphere of mature Norway spruce ( ) trees publication-title: Plant and Soil – volume: 148 start-page: 456 year: 1996 end-page: 463 article-title: A phytotron for plant stress research: how far can artificial lighting compare to natural sunlight? publication-title: Journal of Plant Physiology – volume: 75 start-page: 259 year: 1995 end-page: 265 article-title: Importance of crown position and morphological plasticity in competitive interaction in a population of publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 13 start-page: 682 year: 1993 end-page: 684 article-title: Fichten‐Reinbestand und Fichten‐Buchen‐Mischbestand im Leistungsvergleich publication-title: AFZ – Der Wald – volume: 153 start-page: 376 year: 1981 end-page: 387 article-title: Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves publication-title: Planta – volume: 66 start-page: 343 year: 1985 end-page: 352 article-title: Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a central European hedgerow. IV. Growth form and partitioning publication-title: Oecologia – start-page: 176 year: 1997 – volume: 25 start-page: 1077 year: 1995 end-page: 1083 article-title: Effects of elevated CO , water‐stress, and nitrogen level on competitive interactions of simulated loblolly pine and sweetgum stands publication-title: Canadian Journal of Forest Research – volume: 26 start-page: 835 year: 2003 end-page: 844 article-title: Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments? publication-title: Plant, Cell & Environment – volume: 79 start-page: 631 year: 1997 end-page: 641 article-title: Effect of crown asymmetry on size‐structure dynamics of plant populations publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 65 start-page: 94 year: 1984 end-page: 100 article-title: Carbon relations and competition between woody species in a Central European hedgerow. III. Carbon and water balance on the leaf level publication-title: Oecologia – year: 2003 – volume: 157 start-page: 213 year: 2003 end-page: 228 article-title: Source–sink balance and carbon allocation below ground in plant exposed to ozone publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 50 start-page: 1629 year: 1999 end-page: 1634 article-title: Plant–plant signalling, the shade‐avoidance response and competition publication-title: Journal of Experimental Botany – volume: 50 start-page: 15 year: 1999 end-page: 28 article-title: An ecophysiological approach to modelling resource fluxes in competing plants publication-title: Journal of Experimental Botany – year: 2000 – volume: 127 start-page: 483 year: 1994 end-page: 493 article-title: Modelling root architecture: are there tradeoffs between efficiency and potential resource acquisition? publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 16 start-page: 42 year: 1994. end-page: 57 – volume: 185 start-page: 75 year: 1996 end-page: 97 article-title: The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: Opinion publication-title: Plant and Soil – volume: 157 start-page: 107 year: 2001 end-page: 125 article-title: Interspecific competition in plants: how well do current methods answer fundamental questions? publication-title: American Naturalist – year: 1950 – volume: 24 start-page: 1045 year: 2004 end-page: 1055 article-title: Competition modifies effects of enhanced ozone/carbon dioxide concentrations on the carbohydrate and biomass accumulation in juvenile Norway spruce and European beech publication-title: Tree Physiology – volume: 115 start-page: 319 year: 2001 end-page: 334 article-title: Growth and crown architecture of two aspen genotypes exposed to interacting ozone and carbon dioxide publication-title: Environmental Pollution – volume: 77 start-page: 47 year: 1996 end-page: 57 article-title: Decomposition analysis of competitive symmetry and size structure dynamics publication-title: Annals of Botany – volume: 10 start-page: 44 year: 1996 end-page: 50 article-title: Plasticity in root/shoot partitioning: optimal, ontogenetic, or both? publication-title: Functional Ecology – start-page: 214 year: 1996 end-page: 264 – volume: 164 start-page: 35 year: 2001 end-page: 41 article-title: Effects of growing roots of Norway spruce ( Karst.) and European beech ( ) on rhizosphere soil solution chemistry publication-title: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science – volume: 4 start-page: 153 year: 2002 end-page: 158 article-title: Quantifying competitiveness in woody plants publication-title: Plant Biology – volume: 17 start-page: 777 year: 1997 end-page: 786 article-title: Nutrient contents and concentrations in relation to growth of and along a European transect publication-title: Tree Physiology – volume: 50 start-page: 29 year: 1999 end-page: 37 article-title: Interspecific competition in natural plant communities: mechanism, trade‐offs and plant‐soil feedbacks publication-title: Journal of Experimental Botany – volume: 22 start-page: 885 year: 2002 end-page: 890 article-title: Influence of shoot architectural position on shoot growth and branching patterns in publication-title: Tree Physiology – volume: 4 start-page: 133 year: 2002 end-page: 136 article-title: Growth and parasite defence in plants; the balance between resource sequestration and retention: in lieu of a guest editorial publication-title: Plant Biology – start-page: 147 year: 2000 end-page: 174 – volume: 132 start-page: 109 year: 2002 end-page: 117 article-title: Elevated CO influences nutrient availability in young beech–spruce communities on two soil types publication-title: Oecologia – volume: 199 start-page: 1 year: 1998 end-page: 10 article-title: The Höglwald field experiments – aims, concept and basic data publication-title: Plant and Soil – volume: 229 start-page: 97 year: 2001 end-page: 104 article-title: Influence of tree species and ground vegetation on nitrification in an acid forest soil publication-title: Plant and Soil – volume: 140 start-page: 185 year: 1998 end-page: 196 article-title: Effects of elevated CO and soil quality on leaf gas exchange and above‐ground growth in beech–spruce model ecosystem publication-title: New Phytologist – volume: 3/2 start-page: 115 year: 2000 end-page: 127 article-title: The effect of nutrient availability on biomass allocation patterns in 27 species of herbaceous plants publication-title: Perspectives on Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics – ident: e_1_2_7_2_1 doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.330.29 – ident: e_1_2_7_25_1 doi: 10.1038/35081062 – ident: e_1_2_7_37_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00384469 – ident: e_1_2_7_21_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02340773 – ident: e_1_2_7_30_1 doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0937-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_4_1 doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.340.1629 – ident: e_1_2_7_20_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00276.x – ident: e_1_2_7_34_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1004384909535 – ident: e_1_2_7_62_1 doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0388 – start-page: 585 volume-title: On the economy of plant form and function year: 1986 ident: e_1_2_7_54_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_44_1 doi: 10.1093/treephys/24.9.1045 – ident: e_1_2_7_15_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00384257 – volume: 13 start-page: 682 year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_48_1 article-title: Fichten‐Reinbestand und Fichten‐Buchen‐Mischbestand im Leistungsvergleich publication-title: AFZ – Der Wald – ident: e_1_2_7_18_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1004755404412 – ident: e_1_2_7_45_1 doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25742 – volume-title: The water culture method for growing plants without soil year: 1950 ident: e_1_2_7_31_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_26_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-294452-9.50008-4 – ident: e_1_2_7_60_1 doi: 10.2307/1940647 – ident: e_1_2_7_19_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01015.x – ident: e_1_2_7_32_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00742.x – volume-title: CRC handbook of chemistry and physics year: 2003 ident: e_1_2_7_43_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_46_1 doi: 10.1007/BF01816820 – ident: e_1_2_7_39_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-155070-7.50009-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_27_1 doi: 10.1055/s-2002-25729 – ident: e_1_2_7_11_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_5 – ident: e_1_2_7_12_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03966.x – ident: e_1_2_7_51_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00268.x – ident: e_1_2_7_28_1 doi: 10.1139/x95-119 – ident: e_1_2_7_53_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00221.x – ident: e_1_2_7_35_1 doi: 10.1079/9780851995519.0147 – ident: e_1_2_7_42_1 doi: 10.1093/jxb/50.330.15 – ident: e_1_2_7_61_1 doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1019 – ident: e_1_2_7_10_1 doi: 10.1002/9781444313765 – ident: e_1_2_7_63_1 doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200102)164:1<35::AID-JPLN35>3.0.CO;2-M – ident: e_1_2_7_58_1 doi: 10.1093/treephys/22.12.885 – ident: e_1_2_7_9_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-012083490-7/50002-5 – ident: e_1_2_7_8_1 doi: 10.1093/treephys/17.12.777 – start-page: 42 volume-title: Critical levels for ozone – a UN‐ECE workshop report year: 1994 ident: e_1_2_7_23_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_38_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00378296 – volume: 10 start-page: 551 year: 1987 ident: e_1_2_7_5_1 article-title: Early detection of neighbour plants by phytochrome perception of spectral changes in reflected sunlight publication-title: Plant, Cell & Environment doi: 10.1111/1365-3040.ep11604091 – ident: e_1_2_7_16_1 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1118:EATQII]2.0.CO;2 – ident: e_1_2_7_40_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00367075 – ident: e_1_2_7_29_1 doi: 10.2307/2390505 – ident: e_1_2_7_36_1 doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0063 – ident: e_1_2_7_13_1 doi: 10.1023/A:1004823132574 – volume-title: SPSS, version 10. year: 2000 ident: e_1_2_7_14_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_56_1 doi: 10.1007/s00468-002-0179-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_59_1 doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80279-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_24_1 doi: 10.2307/2390260 – ident: e_1_2_7_22_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2000.00167.x – ident: e_1_2_7_33_1 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.00993.x – ident: e_1_2_7_64_1 – start-page: 127 volume-title: Design and execution of experiments on CO2 enrichment. year: 1993 ident: e_1_2_7_49_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_57_1 doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001521 – ident: e_1_2_7_3_1 doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00674.x – ident: e_1_2_7_47_1 doi: 10.1078/1433-8319-00007 – ident: e_1_2_7_65_1 doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0140 – ident: e_1_2_7_55_1 doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0006 – ident: e_1_2_7_50_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02832979 – ident: e_1_2_7_6_1 doi: 10.1007/BF00379965 – start-page: 176 volume-title: Stickstoffhaushalt und Wachstum von Fichten‐ und Buchenwäldern Entlang Eines Europäischen Nord‐Süd‐Transektes Lehrstuhl für Pflanzenökologie year: 1997 ident: e_1_2_7_7_1 – ident: e_1_2_7_17_1 doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00225-1 – ident: e_1_2_7_41_1 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-05214-3 – ident: e_1_2_7_52_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02257566 |
SSID | ssj0009562 |
Score | 2.0295856 |
Snippet | $\bullet$ A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and... Summary • A 2‐yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra‐ and inter‐specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and... A 2‐yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra‐ and inter‐specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech ( Fagus sylvatica ) and spruce (... A 2-yr phytotron study was conducted to investigate the intra- and inter-specific competitive behaviour of juvenile beech (Fagus sylvatica) and spruce (Picea... |
SourceID | proquest pubmed pascalfrancis crossref wiley jstor fao |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 181 |
SubjectTerms | Aboveground biomass air pollution allometry Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Biomass Carbon Carbon - metabolism Carbon Dioxide competition Competitiveness Cost efficiency cost–benefit relations Demecology Demography ecological succession elevated carbon dioxide Fagus Fagus - growth & development Fagus - physiology Fagus sylvatica Fagus sylvatica (beech) forest ecosystems forest trees Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology growth & development interspecific competition intraspecific competition Leaves metabolism Ozone ozone (O3) physiology Phytotrons Picea Picea - growth & development Picea - physiology Picea abies Picea abies (spruce) plant growth Plant Leaves Plant Leaves - physiology Plant Roots Plant Roots - physiology Plant Shoots Plant Shoots - physiology Plants Plants and fungi pollutants resource investment Seasons |
Title | Above-ground space sequestration determines competitive success in juvenile beech and spruce trees |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/3694339 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8137.2005.01391.x https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948841 https://www.proquest.com/docview/17100709 https://www.proquest.com/docview/46699024 https://www.proquest.com/docview/67925241 |
Volume | 167 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELag4sCFZ6HhUXzgmpUTO058LIhqhUSFgJX2ZvkVHq0SRDYIOPET-I38EmacZEuqVqoQt0gbO9nxzOSz_fkbQp4aG0LN6pCakIdU-Fqk1jGWQuYLqnLChQrPDr86ksuVeLku1iP_Cc_CDPoQ2wU3jIyYrzHAje3OBjkuYfFyXBoBMJMtEE8idQvx0Zv8L_1dmU-CzFLI9ZzUc25Hsy_V1dq0E2UR-ZOmAxPWQ-2L88DpHOvGj9XhTXI8_c2Bo3K86Dd24X6cUYD8P3a4RW6MmJYeDE54m1wJzR1y7VkLuPP7XeIPbPs1_P75Cw-QNJ5CCnOBRgr3pNlL_UjKCR11EchHRhPt-ljOkX5s6KcesjK8H4VRdx-oiR2hX1LcVu92yerwxbvny3Ss7ZA6CZgjtcby3FVB5ba2nstKeha4zCxABlVlzpQus6jtVwRpcfOQcWG8yipbeFsbw--RnaZtwh6h0F7AkDrOQhC1MJYZ7nNVMONgfu9ZQsppHLUbhc-x_saJnk2AlEYTYlnOQkcT6m8JybYtPw_iH5dosweuos17yNF69TbHnWEUUMpEkZDd6D_bvrhUgnOVkP2ZP50-S1YCpqNlQp5MDqYh-nFLxzSh7TudoThTydTFdwgpAXDk4uI7ZKnyAoBcQu4Pvnv6fNTyqfAXGT3w0kbQR6-XePXgXxs-JNejRm7kRT8iO5svfXgM6G9j92Nc_wFkWErd |
linkProvider | Wiley-Blackwell |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3LbtQwFL1qCxJseLY0PFovYJlRYjtOsmBRaKspbUcIOtLsjO04PJVBZAZaVnwC_8OvsOJL6uskU6ZqpQqpC3aR4kdi35ft43MBHittbRmVNlSW2pAXJQ-1iaLQWT6bZ4Ybm-Hd4f2B6A_5i1EyWoBf3V2Yhh9ituGGmuHtNSo4bkif1nLcw2Jpuzfiopm4d9giLHft0Te3fquf7my6yX5C6fbWwfN-2KYYCI1wri_USjNqMptTXeqCiUwUkWUi1s5z5VlsVGpijRRziRUaz7AixlWRx5lOCl0qxVy7i3AFE4ojcf_mK_oX46-gHQW04GI0DyM688vnfONiqcYdSBIRm6p2k1Y22TbOCofno2vvHrdvwu9uYBtUzMfedKJ75vspzsn_dORvwY02bCcbjZ7dhgVb3YGrz8YutD66C8WGHn-1f378xDsyVUGclTaWeJR6R0tMihZ3ZGti_FrFg7ZIPfUZK8n7inyYOsfjBoQ4wTbviPINoeoRRA7UyzC8lD9cgaVqXNlVIK4-dzJkWGQtL7nSkWIFzZNImTTLiiiAtBMcaVpud0wx8knOrfFyiVOGmUcT6adMHgYQz2p-bvhNLlBn1cmmVG-dG5LD1xQPv5EjKuZJAMteYGdtMZFzxvIA1uYE-KQvkXG34k4DWO8kWjoDh6dWqrLjaS1j5J9Ko_z8ElwIF1NRfn4JkeY0cbFqAPcaZTnpH-mKMnwjvMhfeBDk4GUfn-7_a8V1uNY_2N-TezuD3Qdw3VMCexj4Q1iafJnaRy7Yneg1b1QIvLlsXToGUmio0Q |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMw1V3JbtQwGLbaghAX1kLD0voAx4wS23HiA4fCMJpSGFXASHMz3sKqTEVmoOXEI_A8vAo3noTfTjJlqlaqkHrgFileEvvfbH_-foQeKO1cmZQuVo64mNmSxdokSQyWz4nCMOMKf3f4xYgPx-zZJJusoJ_dXZiGH2Kx4eY1I9hrr-D7tjyu5H4Li-bt1ggEM2nvoAVY7rrDr7B8qx_t9GGuHxIyePr6yTBuMwzEhoPni7XSlJjCCaJLbSkvuE0c5akGxyWK1KjcpNozzGWOa3-ElVCmrEgLnVldKkWh3VV0gfFE-LQR_ZfkL8JfTjoGaM74ZBlFdOKXL7nG1VJNO4ykB2yqGuasbJJtnBQNLwfXwTsOrqJf3bg2oJiPvflM98y3Y5ST_-fAX0NX2qAdbzdadh2tuOoGuvh4CoH14U1kt_X0i_v9_Ye_IVNZDDbaOBww6h0pMbYt6sjV2ISVSoBs4Xoe8lXi9xX-MAe3A-OBQazNO6xCQ17xsMcN1OtofC5_eAutVdPKbSAM9RmIkKGJc6xkSieKWiKyRJm8KGwSobyTG2laZnefYOSTXFrhCemnzOcdzWSYMnkQoXRRc79hNzlDnQ0QTaneghOS41fEH317hqiUZRFaD_K6aItywSgVEdpckt-jvnjBYL2dR2irE2gJ5s2fWanKTee1TD37VJ6I00swziGiIuz0EjwXJININUK3G1056t-TFRX-DQ8Sf-ZBkKO9oX-6868Vt9Clvf5APt8Z7d5FlwMfcMCA30Nrs89zdx8i3ZneDCYFozfnrUp_AI8bp4A |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Above%E2%80%90ground+space+sequestration+determines+competitive+success+in+juvenile+beech+and+spruce+trees&rft.jtitle=The+New+phytologist&rft.au=Kozovits%2C+Alessandra+R.&rft.au=Matyssek%2C+Rainer&rft.au=Winkler%2C+J.+Barbro&rft.au=G%C3%B6ttlein%2C+Axel&rft.date=2005-07-01&rft.pub=Blackwell+Science+Ltd&rft.issn=0028-646X&rft.eissn=1469-8137&rft.volume=167&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=196&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111%2Fj.1469-8137.2005.01391.x&rft.externalDBID=10.1111%252Fj.1469-8137.2005.01391.x&rft.externalDocID=NPH1391 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0028-646X&client=summon |