A Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and PPI-Responsive Esophageal Eosinophilic Infiltration

Objective Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed by the presence of dysphagia and intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration of ≥15 per high-power field (HPF). EoE should be distinguished from proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilic infiltration (PPI-R EEI) in patients that are...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternal Medicine Vol. 51; no. 23; pp. 3235 - 3239
Main Authors Okuyama, Masatsugu, Watanabe, Yoshihisa, Fujiwara, Yasuhiro, Tominaga, Kazunari, Arakawa, Tetsuo, Watanabe, Toshio, Sato, Hiroshi, Oshitani, Nobuhide, Tanaka, Fumio, Hayakawa, Tsuyoshi, Tanigawa, Tetsuya, Yamamori, Kazuki, Uno, Hironori, Takaishi, Osamu, Nebiki, Hiroko, Saeki, Yoshihiko, Ohtani, Kenjiro, Sugawa, Takashi, Tatsuwaki, Hiroshi, Wada, Rikimon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 01.01.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0918-2918
1349-7235
1349-7235
DOI10.2169/internalmedicine.51.8670

Cover

More Information
Summary:Objective Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed by the presence of dysphagia and intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration of ≥15 per high-power field (HPF). EoE should be distinguished from proton pump inhibitor-responsive esophageal eosinophilic infiltration (PPI-R EEI) in patients that are responsive to PPI treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of EoE and PPI-R EEI in Japanese patients in a multicenter study. Methods Ten hospitals participated in this study. Esophageal biopsy was performed when the patients had typical EoE symptoms or when endoscopic findings revealed a typical EoE appearance. EEI was defined as the intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration of ≥15 per HPF. Patients with EEI received rabeprazole for 8 weeks to distinguish EoE from PPI-R EEI. Results A total of 13,634 subjects that underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy because of further examination or as a routine checkup were enrolled. Seventy-one (0.5%) patients suspected with EoE were examined by biopsy. A histological examination of 7 (9.9%) cases revealed EEI. Two of these 7 patients showed no symptoms and the other 5 were treated with PPI. Two (0.01%) patients were diagnosed with EoE and 3 (0.02%) with PPI-R EEI. Conclusion EoE and PPI-R EEI were rare in Japanese patients that underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0918-2918
1349-7235
1349-7235
DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.51.8670