Does depression drive technology overuse or vice-versa? a cross-lagged panel analysis of bidirectional relationships among Chinese university students

The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC Psychology Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 492 - 10
Main Authors Zhan, Yuting, Ding, Xu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England BioMed Central Ltd 09.05.2025
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
AbstractList The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use ([beta] = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use ([beta] = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use ([beta] = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity ([beta] = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants ([beta] = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.BACKGROUNDThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.METHODSThis study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.RESULTSTotal technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.CONCLUSIONThese findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
Abstract Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. Objective This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. Methods This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Results Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08–0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11–0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14–0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16–0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03–0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. Conclusion These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. Objective This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. Methods This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Results Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use ([beta] = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use ([beta] = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use ([beta] = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity ([beta] = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants ([beta] = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. Conclusion These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. Keywords: Depression, Digital technology, University students, Longitudinal study, Cross-lagged panel model, Bidirectional relationship, China
BackgroundThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.MethodsThis study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.ResultsTotal technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08–0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11–0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14–0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16–0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03–0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.ConclusionThese findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.
ArticleNumber 492
Audience Academic
Author Zhan, Yuting
Ding, Xu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yuting
  surname: Zhan
  fullname: Zhan, Yuting
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Xu
  surname: Ding
  fullname: Ding, Xu
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40346650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk9uK2zAQQE3Z0t2m-wN9KIJCaR-81cWW5adlSW-BhYXeXsXEGjtaFCuV7ND8SL-3SrINSelDMcaSfOZIGmaeZme97zHLnjN6xZiSb2NBRVnnlJfpVQXN1aPsgtOS5hVX4uxofJ5dxnhPKWVMUFHzJ9l5ii2kLOlF9uudx0gMrgLGaH1PTLBrJAM2i947322IX2MYIxIfyNo2mKdphGsCpAk-xtxB16EhK-jREejBbaKNxLdkbo0N2AxJCo4EdLAdxoVdRQJL33dkurA9JvPY263UDhsSh9FgP8Rn2eMWXMTLh-8k-_bh_dfpp_z27uNsenObN5LJIa_nFasLCTVvlRAV5W01VwBAVQtFK0s0nFVYlswIU4GRWEhjSlOg4mLeslpMstneazzc61WwSwgb7cHq3YIPnYYw2MahriWv5tIAZQCFKdK-SlRGocAGjSrL5Lreu1bjfImmSfcI4E6kp396u9CdX2vGqSzTYZLh9YMh-B8jxkEvbWzQuZRcP0YtOOUFZYWoEvryL_TejyFleksxWabDJu5AdZBuYPvWp42brVTfKFEzVtepFCbZ1T-o9Bhc2iaVXWvT-knAm5OAxAz4c-hgjFHPvnz-f_bu-yn76ohdILhhEb0bd4VzCr44TvUhx3_qOgF8D-yKNGB7QBjV2_7R-_7RqX_0rn-0Er8B3AwMSQ
Cites_doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
10.1371/journal.pone.0213438
10.1177/2167702618812727
10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
10.1136/bjsports-2016-097667
10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114513
10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.042
10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
10.1371/journal.pone.0165331
10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x
10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160
10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00352
10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
10.1089/cyber.2019.0079
10.1037/a0038889
10.1080/10705519909540118
10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
10.1080/10437797.2019.1586803
10.1177/0956797616678438
10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9
10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030
10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005
10.3390/ijerph16203912
10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2
10.1016/j.chb.2020.106348
10.1037/a0022640
10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.121
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021
10.1037/ppm0000047
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2025. The Author(s).
COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
The Author(s) 2025 2025
Copyright_xml – notice: 2025. The Author(s).
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
IOV
ISR
3V.
7X7
7XB
88E
88G
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
COVID
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
K9.
M0S
M1P
M2M
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PSYQQ
Q9U
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s40359-025-02840-8
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Psychology Database (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Medical Database ProQuest
Psychology Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Basic
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Psychology
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Basic
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Coronavirus Research Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest Psychology Journals
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE
MEDLINE - Academic




Publicly Available Content Database

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Psychology
EISSN 2050-7283
EndPage 10
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855
PMC12065193
A839119940
40346650
10_1186_s40359_025_02840_8
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GroupedDBID 0R~
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABUWG
ACGFS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
ASPBG
AZQEC
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DWQXO
EBLON
EBS
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
IOV
IPY
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M2M
M~E
OK1
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PSYQQ
RBZ
ROL
RPM
RSV
SOJ
UKHRP
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PJZUB
PPXIY
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
COVID
K9.
M48
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
Q9U
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-9b71946a92f833702f7b8aaa08fa4f65ed217e551d3d7ad6e46dd5d4e823bf193
IEDL.DBID DOA
ISSN 2050-7283
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:14 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:27:05 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 18:05:46 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 09:23:54 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:00:06 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:54:16 EDT 2025
Thu May 15 23:52:47 EDT 2025
Thu May 15 23:52:22 EDT 2025
Tue May 20 02:10:44 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 05:47:49 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:42:49 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Cross-lagged panel model
University students
China
Longitudinal study
Depression
Bidirectional relationship
Digital technology
Language English
License 2025. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c616t-9b71946a92f833702f7b8aaa08fa4f65ed217e551d3d7ad6e46dd5d4e823bf193
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://doaj.org/article/9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855
PMID 40346650
PQID 3216562714
PQPubID 2040159
PageCount 10
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12065193
proquest_miscellaneous_3202401437
proquest_journals_3216562714
gale_infotracmisc_A839119940
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A839119940
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A839119940
gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A839119940
gale_healthsolutions_A839119940
pubmed_primary_40346650
crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_025_02840_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2025-05-09
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2025-05-09
PublicationDate_xml – month: 05
  year: 2025
  text: 2025-05-09
  day: 09
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: London
PublicationTitle BMC Psychology
PublicationTitleAlternate BMC Psychol
PublicationYear 2025
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References J Zhang (2840_CR30) 2021; 228
CK Enders (2840_CR7) 2011; 16
W Wang (2840_CR27) 2014; 36
L Chen (2840_CR2) 2019; 14
T Heffer (2840_CR10) 2019; 7
D Kardefelt-Winther (2840_CR13) 2014; 31
K Kroenke (2840_CR14) 2001; 16
JD Elhai (2840_CR6) 2017; 207
M Kwon (2840_CR15) 2013; 8
EL Hamaker (2840_CR9) 2015; 20
Q Huang (2840_CR12) 2020; 11
MA Christensen (2840_CR4) 2016; 11
J Fardouly (2840_CR8) 2016; 9
FS Luppino (2840_CR19) 2010; 67
M Liu (2840_CR17) 2018; 52
Y Chen (2840_CR3) 2020; 108
Y Li (2840_CR16) 2021; 281
SM Coyne (2840_CR5) 2020; 104
A Vannucci (2840_CR25) 2019; 48
DJ Buysse (2840_CR1) 1989; 28
LT Hu (2840_CR11) 1999; 6
IE Thorisdottir (2840_CR23) 2019; 22
BF Zhou (2840_CR31) 2002; 15
S Liu (2840_CR18) 2019; 16
EA Vogel (2840_CR26) 2014; 3
AK Przybylski (2840_CR20) 2017; 28
RL Spitzer (2840_CR22) 2006; 166
2840_CR28
DA Scott (2840_CR21) 2019; 55
J Yang (2840_CR29) 2022; 311
PM Valkenburg (2840_CR24) 2016; 67
References_xml – volume: 8
  issue: 12
  year: 2013
  ident: 2840_CR15
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
– volume: 14
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR2
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213438
– volume: 7
  start-page: 462
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR10
  publication-title: Clinical Psychological Science
  doi: 10.1177/2167702618812727
– volume: 28
  start-page: 193
  issue: 2
  year: 1989
  ident: 2840_CR1
  publication-title: Psychiatry Res
  doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
– volume: 52
  start-page: 949
  issue: 15
  year: 2018
  ident: 2840_CR17
  publication-title: Br J Sports Med
  doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097667
– volume: 311
  year: 2022
  ident: 2840_CR29
  publication-title: Psychiatry Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114513
– volume: 228
  start-page: 235
  year: 2021
  ident: 2840_CR30
  publication-title: J Pediatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.042
– volume: 31
  start-page: 351
  year: 2014
  ident: 2840_CR13
  publication-title: Comput Hum Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059
– volume: 67
  start-page: 315
  year: 2016
  ident: 2840_CR24
  publication-title: Annu Rev Psychol
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608
– volume: 11
  issue: 11
  year: 2016
  ident: 2840_CR4
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165331
– volume: 15
  start-page: 83
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 2840_CR31
  publication-title: Biomed Environ Sci
  doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x
– volume: 104
  year: 2020
  ident: 2840_CR5
  publication-title: Comput Hum Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160
– volume: 11
  year: 2020
  ident: 2840_CR12
  publication-title: Front Psych
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00352
– volume: 16
  start-page: 606
  issue: 9
  year: 2001
  ident: 2840_CR14
  publication-title: J Gen Intern Med
  doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
– volume: 22
  start-page: 535
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR23
  publication-title: Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw
  doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0079
– volume: 20
  start-page: 102
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 2840_CR9
  publication-title: Psychol Methods
  doi: 10.1037/a0038889
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 1999
  ident: 2840_CR11
  publication-title: Struct Equ Modeling
  doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
– volume: 166
  start-page: 1092
  issue: 10
  year: 2006
  ident: 2840_CR22
  publication-title: Arch Intern Med
  doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
– volume: 55
  start-page: 564
  issue: 3
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR21
  publication-title: J Soc Work Educ
  doi: 10.1080/10437797.2019.1586803
– volume: 28
  start-page: 204
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 2840_CR20
  publication-title: Psychol Sci
  doi: 10.1177/0956797616678438
– volume: 48
  start-page: 1469
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR25
  publication-title: J Youth Adolesc
  doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9
– volume: 207
  start-page: 251
  year: 2017
  ident: 2840_CR6
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030
– ident: 2840_CR28
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 2840_CR8
  publication-title: Curr Opin Psychol
  doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005
– volume: 16
  issue: 20
  year: 2019
  ident: 2840_CR18
  publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health
  doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203912
– volume: 67
  start-page: 220
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 2840_CR19
  publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2
– volume: 108
  year: 2020
  ident: 2840_CR3
  publication-title: Comput Hum Behav
  doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106348
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  ident: 2840_CR7
  publication-title: Psychol Methods
  doi: 10.1037/a0022640
– volume: 281
  start-page: 597
  year: 2021
  ident: 2840_CR16
  publication-title: J Affect Disord
  doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.121
– volume: 36
  start-page: 539
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  ident: 2840_CR27
  publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry
  doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021
– volume: 3
  start-page: 206
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  ident: 2840_CR26
  publication-title: Psychol Pop Media Cult
  doi: 10.1037/ppm0000047
SSID ssj0001130392
Score 2.3050535
Snippet The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains...
Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional...
BackgroundThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional...
Abstract Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
StartPage 492
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Analysis
Anxiety
Anxiety - psychology
Behavior
Bidirectional relationship
Body mass index
Care and treatment
China - epidemiology
College students
Cross-lagged panel model
Cross-sectional studies
Demographic aspects
Depression
Depression - epidemiology
Depression - psychology
Depression, Mental
Diagnosis
Digital technology
Female
Health aspects
Health promotion
Humans
Hypotheses
Internet access
Longitudinal Studies
Longitudinal study
Male
Mental depression
Methods
Missing data
Motivation
Obesity
Overweight
Prevalence studies (Epidemiology)
Psychological aspects
Questionnaires
Sleep
Smartphones
Social aspects
Sociodemographics
Students - psychology
Technology application
Time use
Universities
University students
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagXHpBvAkUMAiJA7KaOI7jnKryqAoSIAFFe7McP7YrVcmS7B74I_xeZpxs2ggJIeUUj6PE8_Rk_A0hL22d1cJ5z4Q3gQluU2aMqFioeOogPioKi4eTP32Wp2fi46JYjAm3fiyr3NnEaKhdazFHfphzxInhZSaO1j8Zdo3Cv6tjC43r5AZCl6FUl4vyMseCBrriu7MySh72AiHrGPZwBccqUqZm_ijC9v9tnK94p3nl5BVXdHKL3BxjSHo8MP02ueabO2R_MmW_7pLf71rf06nKtaGuA6tGN1MenWLl5rb3tO0o2gqG1RnmiBoaX5NdmOXSOwqmwl9QMwKX0DbQejU4wZhBpN2ulO58te5pbFxEsSO3hydvp5IP2g8Amv09cnby_vvbUzZ2YGBWZnLDqrrMKiFNxYPK8zLloayVMSZVwYggC-9gR-Mh6HK5K42TXkjnCie84nkdIDa8T_aatvEPCcXZnpfcBp4LISplsiLUuS9sWdu8kgl5veODXg9AGzpuUJTUA9c0cE1HrmmVkDfIqokSQbLjjbZb6lHnNPYVqqUzaQbi5wR8CezGnfK5t96pokjIM2S0Hk6cTqqujyFozBAzOU3Ii0iBQBkNVuIszbbv9YcvP_6D6NvXGdGrkSi0IDnWjKcfYHEQgGtGeTCjBHW38-GdWOrR3PT6UjkS8nwaxplYQtf4dos0CGcH4XGZkAeDFE_LB-srJMTqCVEz-Z6t73ykWZ1HMPKMQxALnH707_d6TPZ51Dq4qgOyt-m2_gmEc5v6adTZP4n3TE8
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Does depression drive technology overuse or vice-versa? a cross-lagged panel analysis of bidirectional relationships among Chinese university students
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40346650
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216562714
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3202401437
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12065193
https://doaj.org/article/9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagXHpBvEkpi0FIHJDVxHEc54S20KqsREEtRXuznNjerlQl1Wb3wB_h9zLjZKONOMABKVKkeBxZM-N5WONvCHlblUkprHNMOOOZ4FXMjBEF8wWPLcRHWVbh5eQv5_LsSszm2Xyn1RfWhHXwwB3jjrA5TCmtiRP4hxWQc0NKZZVLXeWsygJ6Kfi8nWQqnK6gaS749paMkketQLA6ht1bwaWKmKmRJwqA_X-a5R2_NK6Z3HFCpw_I_T56pNNu1Q_JHVc_IvuDEfv5mPz61LiWDvWtNbUrsGd0PZygU6zZ3LSONiuKVoJhXYb5QA0Ny2Q3ZrFwloKRcDfU9JAltPG0XHbuL5wd0tW2iO56edvS0LKIYi9uB3_eDMUetO2gM9sn5Or05PvHM9b3XmCVTOSaFWUOrJam4F6laR5zn5fKGBMrb4SXmbOQyzgIt2xqc2OlE9LazAqneFp6iAqfkr26qd1zQnG24zmvPE-FEIUySebL1GVVXlZpISPyfisHfdtBbOiQmiipO6lpkJoOUtMqIscoqoES4bHDB1Aa3SuN_pvSROQVClp3d02HTa6nEC4miJYcR-RNoECIjBprcBZm07b689cf_0B0eTEietcT-QY0pzL9vQdgDkJvjSgPR5Sw0avx8FYtdW9oWp1yhE_ieSIi8noYxplYPFe7ZoM0CGQHgXEekWedFg_sA_4KCVF6RNRIv0f8HY_Uy-sAQ55wCF9B0gf_QyIvyD4PexOe4pDsrVcb9xLCvXU5IXfzeT4h96bT2eUM3scn598uJmG__wbJEVkM
linkProvider Directory of Open Access Journals
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqcqAXxJtAoQaBOKCoieM4zgFVhVLt0gcStGhvrhM725WqZNnsCvWP8DP4jcw4jzZCQlwq5bSeRIln_M2Md_wNIa_zLMy4sdbnVhc-Z3nga81Tv0hZYCA-iuMcDycfHYvRKf88iSdr5Hd3FgbLKjtMdEBtqhz3yLcjhjwxLAn5zvyHj12j8N_VroVGYxYH9vInpGz1-_Ee6PcNY_ufTj6O_LargJ-LUCz9NEsgcRc6ZYWMoiRgRZJJrXUgC80LEVsDUbqFQMJEJtFGWC6MiQ23kkVZESL5EkD-LXC8ASZ7ySS52tNBh5Cy7myOFNs1R4o8H3vGgiPngS8H_s-1CfjbGVzzhsNKzWuub_8uudPGrHS3MbJ7ZM2W98lGD52XD8ivvcrWtK-qLalZAIrSZb9vT7FSdFVbWi0oYpOP1SB6h2rqXtO_0NOpNRSgyV5Q3RKl0Kqg2axxum7Hki660r3z2bymrlESxQ7gFp686ktMaN0QdtYPyemN6OYRWS-r0j4hFO-2LGF5wSLOeSp1GBdZZOM8yfIoFR551-lBzRtiD-USIilUozUFWlNOa0p65AOqqpdEUm73Q7WYqnaNK-xjlAmjgxDM3XD4Esj-jbSRza2RceyRLVS0ak649tCidiFIDZGjOfDIKyeBxBwlVv5M9aqu1fjL9_8Q-vZ1IPS2FSoqsJxct6ctYHKQ8GsguTmQBHjJh8OdWaoW3mp1tRg98rIfxjuxZK-01QplkD4PwvHEI48bK-6nD-aXC8gNPCIH9j2Y3-FIOTt35Ochg6AZNP303--1RW6PTo4O1eH4-OAZ2WBuBcKVbpL15WJln0MoucxeuPVLydlNA8Yf3M6JcA
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does+depression+drive+technology+overuse+or+vice-versa%3F+a+cross-lagged+panel+analysis+of+bidirectional+relationships+among+Chinese+university+students&rft.jtitle=BMC+Psychology&rft.au=Zhan%2C+Yuting&rft.au=Ding%2C+Xu&rft.date=2025-05-09&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=2050-7283&rft.volume=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40359-025-02840-8&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40346650&rft.externalDocID=PMC12065193
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon