Does depression drive technology overuse or vice-versa? a cross-lagged panel analysis of bidirectional relationships among Chinese university students
The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidenc...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC Psychology Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 492 - 10 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
BioMed Central Ltd
09.05.2025
BioMed Central BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.
This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.
This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.
Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.
These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. |
---|---|
AbstractList | The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use ([beta] = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use ([beta] = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use ([beta] = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity ([beta] = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants ([beta] = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.BACKGROUNDThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.OBJECTIVEThis study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.METHODSThis study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.RESULTSTotal technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students.CONCLUSIONThese findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. Abstract Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. Objective This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. Methods This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Results Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08–0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11–0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14–0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16–0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03–0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. Conclusion These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations. Objective This study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design. Methods This study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates. Results Total technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use ([beta] = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08-0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use ([beta] = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11-0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use ([beta] = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14-0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity ([beta] = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16-0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants ([beta] = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03-0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors. Conclusion These findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. Keywords: Depression, Digital technology, University students, Longitudinal study, Cross-lagged panel model, Bidirectional relationship, China BackgroundThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains contested. While cross-sectional research suggests associations between technology use patterns and depressive symptoms, longitudinal evidence examining bidirectional influences remains scarce, particularly in non-Western populations.ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the bidirectional relationships between specific technology use patterns and depression severity among Chinese university students using a methodologically rigorous longitudinal design.MethodsThis study conducted a four-wave longitudinal study with assessments at 3-month intervals among undergraduate students (N = 737) from three universities in eastern China. Participants completed validated measures of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), anxiety (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7), and technology use patterns (duration, timing, motivational contexts). Cross-lagged panel models with random intercepts were used to examine bidirectional relationships while controlling for between-person differences and covariates.ResultsTotal technology use exhibited significant bidirectional relationships with depression, but specific patterns showed distinct relationships. Night-time use (β = 0.16, 95% CI [0.08–0.24], p < 0.001) and social-comparison-motivated use (β = 0.19, 95% CI [0.11–0.27], p < 0.001) predicted subsequent increases in depression, with stronger effects than the reverse pathway (depression to increased technology use). Conversely, depression predicted increased escapism-motivated technology use (β = 0.23, 95% CI [0.14–0.32], p < 0.001) more strongly than the reverse pathway. Body mass index significantly moderated these relationships, with stronger technology-to-depression effects among participants with overweight/obesity (β = 0.27, 95% CI [0.16–0.38], p < 0.001) compared to normal-weight participants (β = 0.11, 95% CI [0.03–0.19], p = 0.009). The observed relationships remained significant after adjusting for anxiety, sleep quality, and socioeconomic factors.ConclusionThese findings reveal complex, pattern-specific bidirectional relationships between technology use and depression, with important temporal precedence differences. The results suggest that certain technology use contexts may contribute more strongly to depression development, while depression may drive other specific usage patterns. These findings have implications for targeted intervention approaches addressing both depression and problematic technology use among university students. |
ArticleNumber | 492 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Zhan, Yuting Ding, Xu |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Yuting surname: Zhan fullname: Zhan, Yuting – sequence: 2 givenname: Xu surname: Ding fullname: Ding, Xu |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40346650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNk9uK2zAQQE3Z0t2m-wN9KIJCaR-81cWW5adlSW-BhYXeXsXEGjtaFCuV7ND8SL-3SrINSelDMcaSfOZIGmaeZme97zHLnjN6xZiSb2NBRVnnlJfpVQXN1aPsgtOS5hVX4uxofJ5dxnhPKWVMUFHzJ9l5ii2kLOlF9uudx0gMrgLGaH1PTLBrJAM2i947322IX2MYIxIfyNo2mKdphGsCpAk-xtxB16EhK-jREejBbaKNxLdkbo0N2AxJCo4EdLAdxoVdRQJL33dkurA9JvPY263UDhsSh9FgP8Rn2eMWXMTLh-8k-_bh_dfpp_z27uNsenObN5LJIa_nFasLCTVvlRAV5W01VwBAVQtFK0s0nFVYlswIU4GRWEhjSlOg4mLeslpMstneazzc61WwSwgb7cHq3YIPnYYw2MahriWv5tIAZQCFKdK-SlRGocAGjSrL5Lreu1bjfImmSfcI4E6kp396u9CdX2vGqSzTYZLh9YMh-B8jxkEvbWzQuZRcP0YtOOUFZYWoEvryL_TejyFleksxWabDJu5AdZBuYPvWp42brVTfKFEzVtepFCbZ1T-o9Bhc2iaVXWvT-knAm5OAxAz4c-hgjFHPvnz-f_bu-yn76ohdILhhEb0bd4VzCr44TvUhx3_qOgF8D-yKNGB7QBjV2_7R-_7RqX_0rn-0Er8B3AwMSQ |
Cites_doi | 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558 10.1371/journal.pone.0213438 10.1177/2167702618812727 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097667 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114513 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.042 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 10.1371/journal.pone.0165331 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00352 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x 10.1089/cyber.2019.0079 10.1037/a0038889 10.1080/10705519909540118 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 10.1080/10437797.2019.1586803 10.1177/0956797616678438 10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005 10.3390/ijerph16203912 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106348 10.1037/a0022640 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.121 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021 10.1037/ppm0000047 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2025. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2025. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2025 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2025. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. – notice: The Author(s) 2025 2025 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM IOV ISR 3V. 7X7 7XB 88E 88G 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU COVID DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ K9. M0S M1P M2M PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PSYQQ Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s40359-025-02840-8 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints Gale In Context: Science ProQuest Central (Corporate) Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Psychology Database (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Health & Medical Collection (Alumni) Medical Database ProQuest Psychology Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Psychology ProQuest Central Student ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition Coronavirus Research Database ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Psychology Journals (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Psychology Journals ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Psychology |
EISSN | 2050-7283 |
EndPage | 10 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855 PMC12065193 A839119940 40346650 10_1186_s40359_025_02840_8 |
Genre | Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
GroupedDBID | 0R~ 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAYXX ABUWG ACGFS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS ASPBG AZQEC BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CITATION DIK DWQXO EBLON EBS FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR IHW INH INR IOV IPY ISR ITC KQ8 M1P M2M M~E OK1 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PSYQQ RBZ ROL RPM RSV SOJ UKHRP CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PJZUB PPXIY PMFND 3V. 7XB 8FK COVID K9. M48 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM PUEGO |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c616t-9b71946a92f833702f7b8aaa08fa4f65ed217e551d3d7ad6e46dd5d4e823bf193 |
IEDL.DBID | DOA |
ISSN | 2050-7283 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:25:14 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:27:05 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 18:05:46 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 09:23:54 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:00:06 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:54:16 EDT 2025 Thu May 15 23:52:47 EDT 2025 Thu May 15 23:52:22 EDT 2025 Tue May 20 02:10:44 EDT 2025 Mon Jul 21 05:47:49 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:42:49 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Cross-lagged panel model University students China Longitudinal study Depression Bidirectional relationship Digital technology |
Language | English |
License | 2025. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c616t-9b71946a92f833702f7b8aaa08fa4f65ed217e551d3d7ad6e46dd5d4e823bf193 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doaj.org/article/9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855 |
PMID | 40346650 |
PQID | 3216562714 |
PQPubID | 2040159 |
PageCount | 10 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_12065193 proquest_miscellaneous_3202401437 proquest_journals_3216562714 gale_infotracmisc_A839119940 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A839119940 gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A839119940 gale_incontextgauss_IOV_A839119940 gale_healthsolutions_A839119940 pubmed_primary_40346650 crossref_primary_10_1186_s40359_025_02840_8 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2025-05-09 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2025-05-09 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 05 year: 2025 text: 2025-05-09 day: 09 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England – name: London |
PublicationTitle | BMC Psychology |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Psychol |
PublicationYear | 2025 |
Publisher | BioMed Central Ltd BioMed Central BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BioMed Central – name: BMC |
References | J Zhang (2840_CR30) 2021; 228 CK Enders (2840_CR7) 2011; 16 W Wang (2840_CR27) 2014; 36 L Chen (2840_CR2) 2019; 14 T Heffer (2840_CR10) 2019; 7 D Kardefelt-Winther (2840_CR13) 2014; 31 K Kroenke (2840_CR14) 2001; 16 JD Elhai (2840_CR6) 2017; 207 M Kwon (2840_CR15) 2013; 8 EL Hamaker (2840_CR9) 2015; 20 Q Huang (2840_CR12) 2020; 11 MA Christensen (2840_CR4) 2016; 11 J Fardouly (2840_CR8) 2016; 9 FS Luppino (2840_CR19) 2010; 67 M Liu (2840_CR17) 2018; 52 Y Chen (2840_CR3) 2020; 108 Y Li (2840_CR16) 2021; 281 SM Coyne (2840_CR5) 2020; 104 A Vannucci (2840_CR25) 2019; 48 DJ Buysse (2840_CR1) 1989; 28 LT Hu (2840_CR11) 1999; 6 IE Thorisdottir (2840_CR23) 2019; 22 BF Zhou (2840_CR31) 2002; 15 S Liu (2840_CR18) 2019; 16 EA Vogel (2840_CR26) 2014; 3 AK Przybylski (2840_CR20) 2017; 28 RL Spitzer (2840_CR22) 2006; 166 2840_CR28 DA Scott (2840_CR21) 2019; 55 J Yang (2840_CR29) 2022; 311 PM Valkenburg (2840_CR24) 2016; 67 |
References_xml | – volume: 8 issue: 12 year: 2013 ident: 2840_CR15 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558 – volume: 14 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR2 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213438 – volume: 7 start-page: 462 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR10 publication-title: Clinical Psychological Science doi: 10.1177/2167702618812727 – volume: 28 start-page: 193 issue: 2 year: 1989 ident: 2840_CR1 publication-title: Psychiatry Res doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4 – volume: 52 start-page: 949 issue: 15 year: 2018 ident: 2840_CR17 publication-title: Br J Sports Med doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-097667 – volume: 311 year: 2022 ident: 2840_CR29 publication-title: Psychiatry Res doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114513 – volume: 228 start-page: 235 year: 2021 ident: 2840_CR30 publication-title: J Pediatr doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.042 – volume: 31 start-page: 351 year: 2014 ident: 2840_CR13 publication-title: Comput Hum Behav doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059 – volume: 67 start-page: 315 year: 2016 ident: 2840_CR24 publication-title: Annu Rev Psychol doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033608 – volume: 11 issue: 11 year: 2016 ident: 2840_CR4 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165331 – volume: 15 start-page: 83 issue: 1 year: 2002 ident: 2840_CR31 publication-title: Biomed Environ Sci doi: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.s8.9.x – volume: 104 year: 2020 ident: 2840_CR5 publication-title: Comput Hum Behav doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106160 – volume: 11 year: 2020 ident: 2840_CR12 publication-title: Front Psych doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00352 – volume: 16 start-page: 606 issue: 9 year: 2001 ident: 2840_CR14 publication-title: J Gen Intern Med doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x – volume: 22 start-page: 535 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR23 publication-title: Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw doi: 10.1089/cyber.2019.0079 – volume: 20 start-page: 102 issue: 1 year: 2015 ident: 2840_CR9 publication-title: Psychol Methods doi: 10.1037/a0038889 – volume: 6 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 1999 ident: 2840_CR11 publication-title: Struct Equ Modeling doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 – volume: 166 start-page: 1092 issue: 10 year: 2006 ident: 2840_CR22 publication-title: Arch Intern Med doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 – volume: 55 start-page: 564 issue: 3 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR21 publication-title: J Soc Work Educ doi: 10.1080/10437797.2019.1586803 – volume: 28 start-page: 204 issue: 2 year: 2017 ident: 2840_CR20 publication-title: Psychol Sci doi: 10.1177/0956797616678438 – volume: 48 start-page: 1469 issue: 8 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR25 publication-title: J Youth Adolesc doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9 – volume: 207 start-page: 251 year: 2017 ident: 2840_CR6 publication-title: J Affect Disord doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.030 – ident: 2840_CR28 – volume: 9 start-page: 1 year: 2016 ident: 2840_CR8 publication-title: Curr Opin Psychol doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.09.005 – volume: 16 issue: 20 year: 2019 ident: 2840_CR18 publication-title: Int J Environ Res Public Health doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203912 – volume: 67 start-page: 220 issue: 3 year: 2010 ident: 2840_CR19 publication-title: Arch Gen Psychiatry doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.2 – volume: 108 year: 2020 ident: 2840_CR3 publication-title: Comput Hum Behav doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106348 – volume: 16 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 2840_CR7 publication-title: Psychol Methods doi: 10.1037/a0022640 – volume: 281 start-page: 597 year: 2021 ident: 2840_CR16 publication-title: J Affect Disord doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.121 – volume: 36 start-page: 539 issue: 5 year: 2014 ident: 2840_CR27 publication-title: Gen Hosp Psychiatry doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2014.05.021 – volume: 3 start-page: 206 issue: 4 year: 2014 ident: 2840_CR26 publication-title: Psychol Pop Media Cult doi: 10.1037/ppm0000047 |
SSID | ssj0001130392 |
Score | 2.3050535 |
Snippet | The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional relationship remains... Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional... BackgroundThe escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional... Abstract Background The escalating prevalence of depression among university students coincides with unprecedented technology engagement, yet the directional... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database |
StartPage | 492 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Analysis Anxiety Anxiety - psychology Behavior Bidirectional relationship Body mass index Care and treatment China - epidemiology College students Cross-lagged panel model Cross-sectional studies Demographic aspects Depression Depression - epidemiology Depression - psychology Depression, Mental Diagnosis Digital technology Female Health aspects Health promotion Humans Hypotheses Internet access Longitudinal Studies Longitudinal study Male Mental depression Methods Missing data Motivation Obesity Overweight Prevalence studies (Epidemiology) Psychological aspects Questionnaires Sleep Smartphones Social aspects Sociodemographics Students - psychology Technology application Time use Universities University students Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Lb9QwELagXHpBvAkUMAiJA7KaOI7jnKryqAoSIAFFe7McP7YrVcmS7B74I_xeZpxs2ggJIeUUj6PE8_Rk_A0hL22d1cJ5z4Q3gQluU2aMqFioeOogPioKi4eTP32Wp2fi46JYjAm3fiyr3NnEaKhdazFHfphzxInhZSaO1j8Zdo3Cv6tjC43r5AZCl6FUl4vyMseCBrriu7MySh72AiHrGPZwBccqUqZm_ijC9v9tnK94p3nl5BVXdHKL3BxjSHo8MP02ueabO2R_MmW_7pLf71rf06nKtaGuA6tGN1MenWLl5rb3tO0o2gqG1RnmiBoaX5NdmOXSOwqmwl9QMwKX0DbQejU4wZhBpN2ulO58te5pbFxEsSO3hydvp5IP2g8Amv09cnby_vvbUzZ2YGBWZnLDqrrMKiFNxYPK8zLloayVMSZVwYggC-9gR-Mh6HK5K42TXkjnCie84nkdIDa8T_aatvEPCcXZnpfcBp4LISplsiLUuS9sWdu8kgl5veODXg9AGzpuUJTUA9c0cE1HrmmVkDfIqokSQbLjjbZb6lHnNPYVqqUzaQbi5wR8CezGnfK5t96pokjIM2S0Hk6cTqqujyFozBAzOU3Ii0iBQBkNVuIszbbv9YcvP_6D6NvXGdGrkSi0IDnWjKcfYHEQgGtGeTCjBHW38-GdWOrR3PT6UjkS8nwaxplYQtf4dos0CGcH4XGZkAeDFE_LB-srJMTqCVEz-Z6t73ykWZ1HMPKMQxALnH707_d6TPZ51Dq4qgOyt-m2_gmEc5v6adTZP4n3TE8 priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest |
Title | Does depression drive technology overuse or vice-versa? a cross-lagged panel analysis of bidirectional relationships among Chinese university students |
URI | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/40346650 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3216562714 https://www.proquest.com/docview/3202401437 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC12065193 https://doaj.org/article/9627b6da01aa4d4194837d8e3eced855 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELagXHpBvEkpi0FIHJDVxHEc54S20KqsREEtRXuznNjerlQl1Wb3wB_h9zLjZKONOMABKVKkeBxZM-N5WONvCHlblUkprHNMOOOZ4FXMjBEF8wWPLcRHWVbh5eQv5_LsSszm2Xyn1RfWhHXwwB3jjrA5TCmtiRP4hxWQc0NKZZVLXeWsygJ6Kfi8nWQqnK6gaS749paMkketQLA6ht1bwaWKmKmRJwqA_X-a5R2_NK6Z3HFCpw_I_T56pNNu1Q_JHVc_IvuDEfv5mPz61LiWDvWtNbUrsGd0PZygU6zZ3LSONiuKVoJhXYb5QA0Ny2Q3ZrFwloKRcDfU9JAltPG0XHbuL5wd0tW2iO56edvS0LKIYi9uB3_eDMUetO2gM9sn5Or05PvHM9b3XmCVTOSaFWUOrJam4F6laR5zn5fKGBMrb4SXmbOQyzgIt2xqc2OlE9LazAqneFp6iAqfkr26qd1zQnG24zmvPE-FEIUySebL1GVVXlZpISPyfisHfdtBbOiQmiipO6lpkJoOUtMqIscoqoES4bHDB1Aa3SuN_pvSROQVClp3d02HTa6nEC4miJYcR-RNoECIjBprcBZm07b689cf_0B0eTEietcT-QY0pzL9vQdgDkJvjSgPR5Sw0avx8FYtdW9oWp1yhE_ieSIi8noYxplYPFe7ZoM0CGQHgXEekWedFg_sA_4KCVF6RNRIv0f8HY_Uy-sAQ55wCF9B0gf_QyIvyD4PexOe4pDsrVcb9xLCvXU5IXfzeT4h96bT2eUM3scn598uJmG__wbJEVkM |
linkProvider | Directory of Open Access Journals |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwELaqcqAXxJtAoQaBOKCoieM4zgFVhVLt0gcStGhvrhM725WqZNnsCvWP8DP4jcw4jzZCQlwq5bSeRIln_M2Md_wNIa_zLMy4sdbnVhc-Z3nga81Tv0hZYCA-iuMcDycfHYvRKf88iSdr5Hd3FgbLKjtMdEBtqhz3yLcjhjwxLAn5zvyHj12j8N_VroVGYxYH9vInpGz1-_Ee6PcNY_ufTj6O_LargJ-LUCz9NEsgcRc6ZYWMoiRgRZJJrXUgC80LEVsDUbqFQMJEJtFGWC6MiQ23kkVZESL5EkD-LXC8ASZ7ySS52tNBh5Cy7myOFNs1R4o8H3vGgiPngS8H_s-1CfjbGVzzhsNKzWuub_8uudPGrHS3MbJ7ZM2W98lGD52XD8ivvcrWtK-qLalZAIrSZb9vT7FSdFVbWi0oYpOP1SB6h2rqXtO_0NOpNRSgyV5Q3RKl0Kqg2axxum7Hki660r3z2bymrlESxQ7gFp686ktMaN0QdtYPyemN6OYRWS-r0j4hFO-2LGF5wSLOeSp1GBdZZOM8yfIoFR551-lBzRtiD-USIilUozUFWlNOa0p65AOqqpdEUm73Q7WYqnaNK-xjlAmjgxDM3XD4Esj-jbSRza2RceyRLVS0ak649tCidiFIDZGjOfDIKyeBxBwlVv5M9aqu1fjL9_8Q-vZ1IPS2FSoqsJxct6ctYHKQ8GsguTmQBHjJh8OdWaoW3mp1tRg98rIfxjuxZK-01QplkD4PwvHEI48bK-6nD-aXC8gNPCIH9j2Y3-FIOTt35Ochg6AZNP303--1RW6PTo4O1eH4-OAZ2WBuBcKVbpL15WJln0MoucxeuPVLydlNA8Yf3M6JcA |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does+depression+drive+technology+overuse+or+vice-versa%3F+a+cross-lagged+panel+analysis+of+bidirectional+relationships+among+Chinese+university+students&rft.jtitle=BMC+Psychology&rft.au=Zhan%2C+Yuting&rft.au=Ding%2C+Xu&rft.date=2025-05-09&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=2050-7283&rft.volume=13&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs40359-025-02840-8&rft_id=info%3Apmid%2F40346650&rft.externalDocID=PMC12065193 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2050-7283&client=summon |