Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNeurology and therapy Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 85 - 105
Main Authors Schwedt, Todd J., Myers Oakes, Tina M., Martinez, James M., Vargas, Bert B., Pandey, Hitendra, Pearlman, Eric M., Richardson, Diane R., Varnado, Oralee J., Cobas Meyer, Michael, Goadsby, Peter J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cheshire Springer Healthcare 01.02.2024
Adis, Springer Healthcare
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. Methods In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Results Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P  = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Conclusions Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. Trial registration ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD). Plain Language Summary Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions. People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches. Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity.
AbstractList Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. Methods In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Results Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P  = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Conclusions Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. Trial registration ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD). Plain Language Summary Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions. People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches. Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity.
Abstract Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. Methods In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Results Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Conclusions Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. Trial registration ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions. People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches. Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity.
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.INTRODUCTIONThere have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.METHODSIn this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.RESULTSOf 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.CONCLUSIONSGalcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Author Richardson, Diane R.
Vargas, Bert B.
Pandey, Hitendra
Myers Oakes, Tina M.
Cobas Meyer, Michael
Goadsby, Peter J.
Schwedt, Todd J.
Martinez, James M.
Varnado, Oralee J.
Pearlman, Eric M.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Todd J.
  surname: Schwedt
  fullname: Schwedt, Todd J.
  organization: Mayo Clinic
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Tina M.
  orcidid: 0009-0008-4507-6056
  surname: Myers Oakes
  fullname: Myers Oakes, Tina M.
  email: oakes_tina_marie_myers@lilly.com
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 3
  givenname: James M.
  surname: Martinez
  fullname: Martinez, James M.
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Bert B.
  surname: Vargas
  fullname: Vargas, Bert B.
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Hitendra
  surname: Pandey
  fullname: Pandey, Hitendra
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Eric M.
  surname: Pearlman
  fullname: Pearlman, Eric M.
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Diane R.
  surname: Richardson
  fullname: Richardson, Diane R.
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Oralee J.
  surname: Varnado
  fullname: Varnado, Oralee J.
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Michael
  surname: Cobas Meyer
  fullname: Cobas Meyer, Michael
  organization: Eli Lilly and Company
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Peter J.
  surname: Goadsby
  fullname: Goadsby, Peter J.
  organization: NIHR King’s Clinical Research Facility and Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Department of Neurology, University of California
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9UstuEzEUHaEiWkp_gAXykgUDfszDwwahKJRKRaBQ2Fo3nuvUlccO9kyr9F_4V5wmVJRFV7auz-PK5zwvDnzwWBQvGX3LKG3fpYoyTkvKRUlp3fDy5klxxFknyqYWzcH-LnktDouTlOySVlVbV4LJZ8WhaLtKUtocFb9nYVhDtH5Fxkskc2OsBr0h4HvyHQyOGxIMOQWnwePtNMCS_MSYpkQWdsAVrsGPxIRIvkW8Rj_a4LeE-dqm0FtNvthVBOvxPVlgmtyYiIlhIEAW2SEM9hb7N2QW_BiDc9iTmbM-b-DIRbTgXhRPDbiEJ_vzuPjxaX4x-1yefz09m308L3XDqrFsJUjoeuSINQpoUDc1VjXUnHdVs-xkYzoGrO9kHgjRt1QY6A1iJZslbStxXJztdPsAV2od7QBxowJYdTcIcaUgjlY7VAaYxh6MxkykRgLHzuQEWNtCy5Yia33Yaa2n5YC9zp8SwT0Qffji7aVahWvFaCvbpumywuu9Qgy_JkyjGmzS6FyOIExJcSk7XlWi4xn66l-ze5e_AWcA3wF0DClFNPcQRtW2SGpXJJWLpO6KpG4ySf5H0naEbbZ5Yesep4odNa23pcKorsIUfQ7vMdYf61zgsw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_37667_pk_2023_1274
crossref_primary_10_2147_DDDT_S499848
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2401558
crossref_primary_10_1177_03331024241269735
crossref_primary_10_62087_hpr_2024_0030
crossref_primary_10_1111_head_14824
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2332754
crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1402569
crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2434079
crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_024_01925_w
crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_25_00109_6
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_024_03072_9
crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_023_01698_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_14712598_2025_2456464
crossref_primary_10_1080_17512433_2024_2417655
crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_024_01889_x
crossref_primary_10_1111_head_14692
crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2024_2349791
crossref_primary_10_1177_03331024241298642
Cites_doi 10.1177/0333102413500727
10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3859
10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009
10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640
10.1177/0333102420905132
10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1
10.2307/2533558
10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9
10.1177/0333102417738202
10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x
10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7
10.1001/jama.2018.4853
10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2
10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x
10.1212/WNL.0000000000000771
10.1177/03331024211047454
10.1002/sim.5537
10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8
10.1056/NEJMoa1705848
10.1177/0333102410388435
10.1177/0333102419835459
10.1177/0333102418779543
10.1007/s00415-004-0464-6
10.1177/0333102418788347
10.1198/sbr.2010.09014
10.1056/NEJMoa030505
10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-9
10.1056/NEJMoa2035908
10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-0
10.1177/0333102416653233
10.1056/NEJMoa1811090
10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X
10.1177/0333102411398399
10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212
10.1177/03331024211053571
10.1002/sim.3495
10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s) 2023
2023. The Author(s).
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s) 2023
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w
DatabaseName Springer Nature Open Access Journals
CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 2193-6536
EndPage 105
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3
PMC10787669
37948006
10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Eli Lilly and Company
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004312
GroupedDBID -A0
0R~
2VQ
3V.
53G
5VS
7RV
7X7
8AO
8FI
8FJ
AAKKN
ABDBF
ABEEZ
ABUWG
ACACY
ACGFS
ACUHS
ACULB
ADBBV
ADINQ
ADRAZ
AFGXO
AFKRA
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C24
C6C
CCPQU
DIK
DWQXO
EBS
EJD
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
HMCUK
HYE
HZ~
IAO
IHR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
M2M
M48
M~E
NAPCQ
O9-
OK1
PGMZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSYQQ
RPM
RSV
SISQX
SMD
SOJ
UKHRP
~JE
AAYXX
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
NPM
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-78a8a9de2ee5e3a6ec65e45a522946b986f91a1d9822933d703fadfee486b0743
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2193-8253
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:28:42 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:35:50 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:26:39 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:32:15 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:53:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:59:09 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:41:23 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Prevention
Rimegepant
Comparative efficacy
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)
Migraine
CGRP antagonist
Head-to-head
Galcanezumab
Gepant
Clinical study
Language English
License 2023. The Author(s).
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c614t-78a8a9de2ee5e3a6ec65e45a522946b986f91a1d9822933d703fadfee486b0743
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ORCID 0009-0008-4507-6056
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w
PMID 37948006
PQID 2889244392
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 21
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10787669
proquest_miscellaneous_2889244392
pubmed_primary_37948006
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w
crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w
springer_journals_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2024-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2024-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2024
  text: 2024-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace Cheshire
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Cheshire
– name: New Zealand
PublicationTitle Neurology and therapy
PublicationTitleAbbrev Neurol Ther
PublicationTitleAlternate Neurol Ther
PublicationYear 2024
Publisher Springer Healthcare
Adis, Springer Healthcare
Publisher_xml – name: Springer Healthcare
– name: Adis, Springer Healthcare
References StaufferVLDodickDWZhangQIEvaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol2018751080108810.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212298131476143119
GoadsbyPJReuterUHallstromYA controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraineN Engl J Med2017377212321321:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXms1Gq10.1056/NEJMoa170584829171821
MarcusRGoadsbyPJDodickDStockDManosGFischerTZBMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trialCephalalgia20143411412510.1177/033310241350072723965396
GoadsbyPJPaemeleireKBroessnerGEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia20193981782910.1177/033310241983545930982348
HoTWFerrariMDDodickDWEfficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trialLancet20083729656211521231:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFajs7nE10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-819036425
Eli Lilly and Company. Emgality [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2021. https://pi.lilly.com/us/emgality-uspi.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2023.
Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:737–45.
GoadsbyPJDodickDWAilaniJSafety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trialLancet Neurol2020197277371:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhs1ejsb7J10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-932822633
AshinaMTepperSBrandesJLEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia2018101611162110.1177/0333102418788347
SilbersteinSDStaufferVLDayKALipsiusSWilsonMCGalcanezumab in episodic migraine: subgroup analyses of efficacy by high versus low frequency of migraine headaches in phase 3 studies (EVOLVE-1 & EVOLVE-2)J Headache Pain201920751:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1yktbrJ10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x312530916734504Erratum in: J Headache Pain. 2019; 20:118
OlesenJDienerH-CHusstedtIWBIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study GroupCalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraineN Engl J Med2004350110411101:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitV2qur0%3D10.1056/NEJMoa03050515014183
SkljarevskiVMatharuMMillenBAEfficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trialCephalalgia2018381442145410.1177/033310241877954329848108
ReuterUEhrlichMGendollaAErenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine—a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trialCephalalgia20224210811810.1177/0333102421105357134743579
HoTWConnorKMZhangYRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for migraine preventionNeurology201483119589661:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFert7bJ10.1212/WNL.000000000000077125107879
AshinaMSaperJCadyREptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1)Cephalalgia20204024125410.1177/0333102420905132320754067066477
GuyWECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 19761976RockvilleNational Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch217222
JhingranPOsterhausJTMillerDWDevelopment and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life QuestionnaireHeadache1998382953021:STN:280:DyaK1c3lvVagtg%3D%3D10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x9595870
HewittDJAuroraSKDodickDWRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20113171272210.1177/033310241139839921383045
Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nurtec [package insert]. New Haven, CT: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2023. https://www.pfizermedicalinformation.com/en-us/nurtec-odt. Accessed 31 July 2023.
VossTLiptonRBDodickDWA phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20163688789810.1177/033310241665323327269043
BenschopRJCollinsECDarlingRJDevelopment of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related painOsteoarthritis Cartil2014225785851:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvjt1Ckuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009Erratum in: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 22:1951. Nisenbaum ES [added]
DienerHCBarbantiPDahlöfCReuterUHabeckJPodhornaJBI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II studyCephalalgia20113157358410.1177/033310241038843521172952
DodickDWSilbersteinSDBigalMEEffect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trialJAMA2018319199920081:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXpslerur4%3D10.1001/jama.2018.485329800211
AilaniJLiptonRBGoadsbyPJAtogepant for the preventive treatment of migraineN Engl J Med20213856957061:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFChsrvK10.1056/NEJMoa203590834407343
KenwardMGRogerJHSmall sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihoodBiometrics1997539839971:STN:280:DyaK2svntVGitw%3D%3D10.2307/25335589333350
DienerHCPlacebo effects in treating migraine and other headachesCurr Opin Investig Drugs20101173573920597189
DodickDWGoadsbyPJSpieringsELSchererJCSweeneySPGrayzelDSSafety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyLancet Neurol2014138858921:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtlCktrjF10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-025127173
MillenBADmitrienkoAChain procedures: a class of flexible closed testing procedures with clinical trial applicationsStat Biopharm Res20113143010.1198/sbr.2010.09014
LiptonRBCroopRStockEGRimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraineN Engl J Med20193811421491:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnsFGis7o%3D10.1056/NEJMoa181109031291516
Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251:943–50.
SkljarevskiVOakesTMZhangQEffect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol20187518719310.1001/jamaneurol.2017.385929255900Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75:260
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd ed. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38:1–211.
MullenersWMKimBKLainezMJASafety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trialLancet Neurol2020198148251:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhvVKns7vE10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-932949542
StewartWFLiptonRBKolodnerKBSawyerJLeeCLibermanJNValidity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferersPain200088415210.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-511098098
KordzakhiaGDmitrienkoASuperchain procedures in clinical trials with multiple objectivesStat Medicine20133248650810.1002/sim.5537
PuleddaFSilvaEMSuwanlaongKGoadsbyPJMigraine: from pathophysiology to treatmentJ Neurol20232703654366610.1007/s00415-023-11706-13702983610267278
BretzFMaurerWBrannathWPoschMA graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test proceduresStat Medicine20092858660410.1002/sim.3495
DetkeHCGoadsbyPJWangSFriedmanDISelzlerKJAuroraSKGalcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN studyNeurology201891e2211e22211:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXisVGntr%2FO10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640304465966329331
FörderreutherSZhangQStaufferVLAuroraSKLáinezMJAPreventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studiesJ Headache Pain20181912110.1186/s10194-018-0951-2305941226755564
CroopRLiptonRBKudrowDOral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialLancet20213971026851601:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFantrY%3D10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-733338437
ChowdhuryDBansalLDuggalATOP-PRO study: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraineCephalalgia20224239640810.1177/0333102421104745434579560
T Voss (562_CR9) 2016; 36
TW Ho (562_CR10) 2014; 83
BA Millen (562_CR28) 2011; 3
PJ Goadsby (562_CR31) 2019; 39
SD Silberstein (562_CR39) 2019; 20
DJ Hewitt (562_CR7) 2011; 31
TW Ho (562_CR5) 2008; 372
RJ Benschop (562_CR18) 2014; 22
J Olesen (562_CR4) 2004; 350
WM Mulleners (562_CR17) 2020; 19
WF Stewart (562_CR24) 2000; 88
PJ Goadsby (562_CR36) 2020; 19
RB Lipton (562_CR21) 2019; 381
HC Detke (562_CR13) 2018; 91
DW Dodick (562_CR34) 2018; 319
R Croop (562_CR19) 2021; 397
M Ashina (562_CR32) 2018; 10
F Bretz (562_CR27) 2009; 28
R Marcus (562_CR8) 2014; 34
562_CR20
VL Stauffer (562_CR16) 2018; 75
562_CR41
V Skljarevski (562_CR14) 2018; 38
W Guy (562_CR25) 1976
PJ Goadsby (562_CR33) 2017; 377
562_CR40
562_CR22
562_CR1
M Ashina (562_CR35) 2020; 40
D Chowdhury (562_CR2) 2022; 42
MG Kenward (562_CR26) 1997; 53
G Kordzakhia (562_CR29) 2013; 32
S Förderreuther (562_CR38) 2018; 19
U Reuter (562_CR3) 2022; 42
V Skljarevski (562_CR15) 2018; 75
HC Diener (562_CR30) 2010; 11
P Jhingran (562_CR23) 1998; 38
F Puledda (562_CR11) 2023; 270
J Ailani (562_CR37) 2021; 385
DW Dodick (562_CR12) 2014; 13
HC Diener (562_CR6) 2011; 31
References_xml – reference: SilbersteinSDStaufferVLDayKALipsiusSWilsonMCGalcanezumab in episodic migraine: subgroup analyses of efficacy by high versus low frequency of migraine headaches in phase 3 studies (EVOLVE-1 & EVOLVE-2)J Headache Pain201920751:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1yktbrJ10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x312530916734504Erratum in: J Headache Pain. 2019; 20:118
– reference: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nurtec [package insert]. New Haven, CT: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2023. https://www.pfizermedicalinformation.com/en-us/nurtec-odt. Accessed 31 July 2023.
– reference: PuleddaFSilvaEMSuwanlaongKGoadsbyPJMigraine: from pathophysiology to treatmentJ Neurol20232703654366610.1007/s00415-023-11706-13702983610267278
– reference: ReuterUEhrlichMGendollaAErenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine—a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trialCephalalgia20224210811810.1177/0333102421105357134743579
– reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd ed. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38:1–211.
– reference: VossTLiptonRBDodickDWA phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20163688789810.1177/033310241665323327269043
– reference: GoadsbyPJReuterUHallstromYA controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraineN Engl J Med2017377212321321:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXms1Gq10.1056/NEJMoa170584829171821
– reference: DetkeHCGoadsbyPJWangSFriedmanDISelzlerKJAuroraSKGalcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN studyNeurology201891e2211e22211:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXisVGntr%2FO10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640304465966329331
– reference: Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:737–45.
– reference: DodickDWSilbersteinSDBigalMEEffect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trialJAMA2018319199920081:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXpslerur4%3D10.1001/jama.2018.485329800211
– reference: MullenersWMKimBKLainezMJASafety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trialLancet Neurol2020198148251:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhvVKns7vE10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-932949542
– reference: Eli Lilly and Company. Emgality [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2021. https://pi.lilly.com/us/emgality-uspi.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2023.
– reference: GoadsbyPJPaemeleireKBroessnerGEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia20193981782910.1177/033310241983545930982348
– reference: ChowdhuryDBansalLDuggalATOP-PRO study: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraineCephalalgia20224239640810.1177/0333102421104745434579560
– reference: KenwardMGRogerJHSmall sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihoodBiometrics1997539839971:STN:280:DyaK2svntVGitw%3D%3D10.2307/25335589333350
– reference: SkljarevskiVMatharuMMillenBAEfficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trialCephalalgia2018381442145410.1177/033310241877954329848108
– reference: BenschopRJCollinsECDarlingRJDevelopment of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related painOsteoarthritis Cartil2014225785851:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvjt1Ckuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009Erratum in: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 22:1951. Nisenbaum ES [added]
– reference: DienerHCPlacebo effects in treating migraine and other headachesCurr Opin Investig Drugs20101173573920597189
– reference: SkljarevskiVOakesTMZhangQEffect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol20187518719310.1001/jamaneurol.2017.385929255900Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75:260
– reference: KordzakhiaGDmitrienkoASuperchain procedures in clinical trials with multiple objectivesStat Medicine20133248650810.1002/sim.5537
– reference: HewittDJAuroraSKDodickDWRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20113171272210.1177/033310241139839921383045
– reference: AilaniJLiptonRBGoadsbyPJAtogepant for the preventive treatment of migraineN Engl J Med20213856957061:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFChsrvK10.1056/NEJMoa203590834407343
– reference: Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251:943–50.
– reference: OlesenJDienerH-CHusstedtIWBIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study GroupCalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraineN Engl J Med2004350110411101:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitV2qur0%3D10.1056/NEJMoa03050515014183
– reference: CroopRLiptonRBKudrowDOral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialLancet20213971026851601:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFantrY%3D10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-733338437
– reference: FörderreutherSZhangQStaufferVLAuroraSKLáinezMJAPreventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studiesJ Headache Pain20181912110.1186/s10194-018-0951-2305941226755564
– reference: DienerHCBarbantiPDahlöfCReuterUHabeckJPodhornaJBI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II studyCephalalgia20113157358410.1177/033310241038843521172952
– reference: StewartWFLiptonRBKolodnerKBSawyerJLeeCLibermanJNValidity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferersPain200088415210.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-511098098
– reference: AshinaMTepperSBrandesJLEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia2018101611162110.1177/0333102418788347
– reference: BretzFMaurerWBrannathWPoschMA graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test proceduresStat Medicine20092858660410.1002/sim.3495
– reference: MarcusRGoadsbyPJDodickDStockDManosGFischerTZBMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trialCephalalgia20143411412510.1177/033310241350072723965396
– reference: HoTWFerrariMDDodickDWEfficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trialLancet20083729656211521231:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFajs7nE10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-819036425
– reference: AshinaMSaperJCadyREptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1)Cephalalgia20204024125410.1177/0333102420905132320754067066477
– reference: HoTWConnorKMZhangYRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for migraine preventionNeurology201483119589661:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFert7bJ10.1212/WNL.000000000000077125107879
– reference: MillenBADmitrienkoAChain procedures: a class of flexible closed testing procedures with clinical trial applicationsStat Biopharm Res20113143010.1198/sbr.2010.09014
– reference: LiptonRBCroopRStockEGRimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraineN Engl J Med20193811421491:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnsFGis7o%3D10.1056/NEJMoa181109031291516
– reference: JhingranPOsterhausJTMillerDWDevelopment and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life QuestionnaireHeadache1998382953021:STN:280:DyaK1c3lvVagtg%3D%3D10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x9595870
– reference: GuyWECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 19761976RockvilleNational Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch217222
– reference: StaufferVLDodickDWZhangQIEvaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol2018751080108810.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212298131476143119
– reference: GoadsbyPJDodickDWAilaniJSafety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trialLancet Neurol2020197277371:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhs1ejsb7J10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-932822633
– reference: DodickDWGoadsbyPJSpieringsELSchererJCSweeneySPGrayzelDSSafety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyLancet Neurol2014138858921:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtlCktrjF10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-025127173
– volume: 34
  start-page: 114
  year: 2014
  ident: 562_CR8
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102413500727
– volume: 75
  start-page: 187
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR15
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3859
– volume: 22
  start-page: 578
  year: 2014
  ident: 562_CR18
  publication-title: Osteoarthritis Cartil
  doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009
– ident: 562_CR41
– volume: 91
  start-page: e2211
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR13
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640
– volume: 40
  start-page: 241
  year: 2020
  ident: 562_CR35
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102420905132
– volume: 270
  start-page: 3654
  year: 2023
  ident: 562_CR11
  publication-title: J Neurol
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1
– volume: 53
  start-page: 983
  year: 1997
  ident: 562_CR26
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2533558
– volume: 19
  start-page: 814
  year: 2020
  ident: 562_CR17
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9
– ident: 562_CR22
  doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202
– volume: 11
  start-page: 735
  year: 2010
  ident: 562_CR30
  publication-title: Curr Opin Investig Drugs
– volume: 38
  start-page: 295
  year: 1998
  ident: 562_CR23
  publication-title: Headache
  doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x
– volume: 397
  start-page: 51
  issue: 10268
  year: 2021
  ident: 562_CR19
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7
– volume: 319
  start-page: 1999
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR34
  publication-title: JAMA
  doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853
– volume: 19
  start-page: 121
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR38
  publication-title: J Headache Pain
  doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2
– volume: 20
  start-page: 75
  year: 2019
  ident: 562_CR39
  publication-title: J Headache Pain
  doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x
– volume: 83
  start-page: 958
  issue: 11
  year: 2014
  ident: 562_CR10
  publication-title: Neurology
  doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000771
– volume: 42
  start-page: 396
  year: 2022
  ident: 562_CR2
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/03331024211047454
– volume: 32
  start-page: 486
  year: 2013
  ident: 562_CR29
  publication-title: Stat Medicine
  doi: 10.1002/sim.5537
– volume: 372
  start-page: 2115
  issue: 9656
  year: 2008
  ident: 562_CR5
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8
– volume: 377
  start-page: 2123
  year: 2017
  ident: 562_CR33
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848
– volume: 31
  start-page: 573
  year: 2011
  ident: 562_CR6
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102410388435
– volume: 39
  start-page: 817
  year: 2019
  ident: 562_CR31
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102419835459
– volume: 38
  start-page: 1442
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR14
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102418779543
– ident: 562_CR1
  doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0464-6
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1611
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR32
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347
– volume: 3
  start-page: 14
  year: 2011
  ident: 562_CR28
  publication-title: Stat Biopharm Res
  doi: 10.1198/sbr.2010.09014
– ident: 562_CR40
– volume: 350
  start-page: 1104
  year: 2004
  ident: 562_CR4
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030505
– start-page: 217
  volume-title: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 1976
  year: 1976
  ident: 562_CR25
– volume: 19
  start-page: 727
  year: 2020
  ident: 562_CR36
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-9
– volume: 385
  start-page: 695
  year: 2021
  ident: 562_CR37
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035908
– volume: 13
  start-page: 885
  year: 2014
  ident: 562_CR12
  publication-title: Lancet Neurol
  doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-0
– volume: 36
  start-page: 887
  year: 2016
  ident: 562_CR9
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102416653233
– volume: 381
  start-page: 142
  year: 2019
  ident: 562_CR21
  publication-title: N Engl J Med
  doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090
– ident: 562_CR20
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X
– volume: 31
  start-page: 712
  year: 2011
  ident: 562_CR7
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/0333102411398399
– volume: 75
  start-page: 1080
  year: 2018
  ident: 562_CR16
  publication-title: JAMA Neurol
  doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212
– volume: 42
  start-page: 108
  year: 2022
  ident: 562_CR3
  publication-title: Cephalalgia
  doi: 10.1177/03331024211053571
– volume: 28
  start-page: 586
  year: 2009
  ident: 562_CR27
  publication-title: Stat Medicine
  doi: 10.1002/sim.3495
– volume: 88
  start-page: 41
  year: 2000
  ident: 562_CR24
  publication-title: Pain
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5
SSID ssib044754318
ssj0001340510
Score 2.3733053
Snippet Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine...
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention....
Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant...
Abstract Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 85
SubjectTerms Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)
CGRP antagonist
Galcanezumab
Gepant
Head-to-head
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Migraine
NCT
NCT05127486
Neurology
Original Research
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQiFd4yUjcqAVJvF6bG6y2VEjlsLRSb5Fjj5dI2aQiiar2v_BfmXGyqy6gcuGaxHLs-ez5_JhvGHvjNImAUPiZLp2QmbRCIy8WwXo6ZCPSQVsDJ1_V8Zn8cj47v5Hqi-6EjfLAY8e9CzZ14G1wgM7ufdA2AxOistTcztMy6nyiz7uxmEIkkYqdnLInj7stuST0UaY5ZCwCl0X5FEET4-gkhZAKdF-CpDEzcbnnpaKY_98Y6J8XKX87TY1O6ug-uzexS_5xbNUDdgeah-znYsw12Kw5sj2-JNEI6664bTz_ZgP0V7wN_LOtsZfhetjYktMu2tDxVbWBNfqrpufIbflW7qltqMDyoupaXzl-Uq0pzwR84CvohrrvOMWscMtXWEO7qa7BH_LFeCW-Bs8nKdKanxL4H7Gzo-Xp4lhMWRmEQ1fei7m22hoPGcAMcqvAqRnImUUiZ6QqjVbBpDb1JAxo8tzjlIKGDwBSq5IIy2N20LQNPGU8ZKUhgTultZJzZ0yZhpkOyMq08aXTCUu3VijcJFlOmTPqYie2HC1XoOWKaLniMmFvd2UuRsGOW7_-RMbdfUli2_EBQrCYIFj8C4IJe72FRoGDk05c0F7t0BWZ1ri-Rc6XJezJCJVdVTnOhMjWVcL0Hoj2_mX_TVN9jwLguGRHJ6ZMwg63eCumqae7pbHP_kdjn7O7GfK68eL6C3bQ_xjgJfKyvnwVh-AvxpsyNQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Springer Nature Open Access Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9wwEBZtCqWX0nfdFyr01pjWtixLvbVm01DYHrYJ5CZke7QxeO1Q24Tkv-S_ZsaPhU1DoFdbXtk7nzSfNJpvGPuUKxIBofQzleW-CIX1FfJi39mCgmxEOmhrYPlbHh6LXyfxySSTQ7kwN-L3X1pB2Z0-ehafVCtD__w-exAHUUJlGlKZztgh3Tox1Use91ciQXij2nLIUXxcCEVTzsztP7vjlwb5_ts4579HJ2_ETwe3dPCEPZ74JP8-AuApuwf1M_ZwOUXMn7OrdCw0WK85Uj2-IMUIm19wWxf8j3XQXfDG8Z-2wr8YLvuNzThtofUtX5UbWKOzqjuOxJbPWk9NTQ8szsq2wT74slxTkQn4xlfQ9lXXckpY4ZavsIdmU15Csc_T8Tx8BQWfdEgrfkTIf8GODxZH6aE_lWTwc_TjnZ8oq6wuIASIIbISchmDiC2yOC1kppV0OrBBQaqAOooKnE_Q6g5AKJkRW3nJ9uqmhteMuzDTpG4nlZIiybXOAhcrh5RM6SLLlceC2SAmn_TKqWxGZbZKy4MRDRrRDEY05x77vH3mbFTruLP1D7LztiUpbQ8XEIBmGrjG2SCHwroc8PW_OmVD0G5QNktsEmSRxz7OKDE4MincgvZq-taESuHiFglf6LFXI2q2XUU4DSJVlx5TO3jaeZfdO3V5Oqh_43odPZjUHtufoWemeae942Pf_F_zt-xRiPRtPJ_-ju11f3t4j_Sryz4M4-4a7mQk_Q
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948006
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2889244392
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10787669
https://doaj.org/article/fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEF615cIFFfEylGiRuFEjbG82u0gIQZRSIYVDaKTerPV6Nlhy7BI7KumBf8J_ZcaPoEBUiYsP8TM7M55vZz3fx9hLq4gEhNrPVGJ9EQrjK8TFvjMpLbIR6KDSwPSLPJ-Lz5fDywPWyx11A1jtndqRntR8lb_-8X3zHgP-3bYNTlAHqI_Zxydmy9C_PmR3MDONSNFg-gfuE7ed6DSV2xpMJMgnSX8OcYyPk6Wo66vZf9md3NVQ_O_Dpf9-XvnXGmuTus6O2b0Oc_IPrZPcZwdQPGC_xq0CYbHgiAH5hKgkjN1wU6T8q3FQb3jp-CeT49jDzXppEk61tXXFZ9kSFpjFipoj4uU9CVRZ0AmTq6wq08zyabYg9Ql4y2dQrfO64tTJwg2f4R3KZXYD6Skftx_K55DyjqA05xcUEg_Z_GxyMT73O60G32KCr_2RMsroFEKAIURGgpVDEEOD8E4LmWglnQ5MkBJdoI6iFF806A4OQCiZEIx5xI6KsoAnjLsw0UR7J5WSYmS1TgI3VA6xmtJpYpXHgt4Kse2IzElPI4-3FMyN5WK0XNxYLr722KvtOVctjcetR38k426PJAru5odytYi7iI6dCSykxlnAx3_jlAlBu4bybGRGQRJ57EXvGjGGLK3DoL3KdRWHSuGsF5Fg6LHHratsbxXh-xExvPSY2nGinWfZ3VNk3xpacJzIY2qT2mOnvb_FfTzd8mef_tfQPGN3Q4R1VN0OwhN2VK_W8BxhWZ0M2OE4FLSV40FT2hg00Ufbn5PfS-Qztw
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSMAF8SY8jcSNRiKJk7W5wWrLAt0elq3Um-Uk4yVSNqmaRFX7X_ivzCTOooWqEtfEjpPM2PPZM_MNY-8ySSQglH4m08wXoTC-RFzsW5OTk41ABx0NLI6S-bH4dhKfuKSwZox2H12S_Uq9TXYTlOfpo43xib8y9M9vslsC98wUyDf9wzlODHbCVU4eTloiQZpHVeYQrfi4JYpc9szVj92xUD2R_1Xo898gyr88qb2BOrjP7jlkyT8NqvCA3YDqIbu9cL7zR-zXdCg5WK05gj4-I-4Ik11wU-X8h7HQXvDa8i-mxJ8Nl93GpJwO07qGL4sNrNFsVS1HiMtH1qe6og6z06KpcQy-KNZUbgI-8iU0Xdk2nFJXuOFLHKHeFJeQ7_PpEBlfQs4dI2nJVzQHHrPjg9lqOvddcQY_Q4ve-hNppFE5hAAxRCaBLIlBxAbxnBJJqmRiVWCCnPgBVRTluLKg_C2AkElKuOUJ26vqCp4xbsNUEc9dImUiJplSaWBjaRGcSZWnmfRYMApEZ465nApolHrLudwLUaMQdS9Efe6x99s-pwNvx7WtP5Octy2Jc7u_UJ-ttZvC2pogg9zYDPD1P1hpQlC25zibmEmQRh57O2qJxjlKjheUV901OpQSt7kI_UKPPR20ZjtUhAsigvbEY3JHn3beZfdOVfzsecBx5462LFEe2x9VT7sVqLnmY5__X_M37M58tTjUh1-Pvr9gd0MEdUPU-ku215518ApBWZu-7ufgb1LsK9c
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Zb9QwELagSBUviLvhNBJvNCq5vDZvEHYpx1ZoaaW-WU4yXiJlk1WTVdX-F_4rM7nEQlWJ18SOk8zY843H8w1jr1NJJCCUfiaT1A390LgScbFrTUZBNgIdtDUwPxKHJ-GX0-j0jyz-9rT7EJLschqIpalsDtaZPRgT30LK-XTR3rjEZem75zfZLfRUPHK_YhEPGkVsdmFfRbnbdQlC0kKqOIfIxUX3KOgzaa5-7Ja1akn9r0Ki_x6o_Cuq2hqr2V12p0eZ_H2nFvfYDSjvs915H0d_wH7FXfnBcskRAPIp8UiY9IKbMuM_jIXmgleWfzIF_ni43KxMwmljbVPzRb6CJZqwsuEId_nAAFWV1GG6zusKx-DzfEmlJ-AdX0C9KZqaUxoLN3yBI1Sr_BKyfR53p-QLyHjPTlrwY5oPD9nJbHocH7p9oQY3ReveuBNppFEZ-AARBEZAKiIII4PYToUiUVJY5RkvI65AFQQZrjKoCxYglCIhDPOI7ZRVCXuMWz9RxHknpBThJFUq8WwkLQI1qbIklQ7zBoHotGcxp2IahR75l1shahSiboWozx32Zuyz7jg8rm39geQ8tiT-7fZCdbbU_XTW1ngpZMamgK__1krjg7It39nETLwkcNirQUs0zlcKwqC8qk2tfSnR5UUY6Dvscac141ABLo4I4IXD5JY-bb3L9p0y_9lygqMXj3ZNKIftD6qn-9WovuZjn_xf85ds9_vHmf72-ejrU3bbR3zXHWB_xnaasw08R3zWJC_aKfgbZk8wOg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+Efficacy+and+Safety+of+Galcanezumab+Versus+Rimegepant+for+Prevention+of+Episodic+Migraine%3A+Results+from+a+Randomized%2C+Controlled+Clinical+Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurology+and+therapy&rft.au=Schwedt%2C+Todd+J.&rft.au=Myers+Oakes%2C+Tina+M.&rft.au=Martinez%2C+James+M.&rft.au=Vargas%2C+Bert+B.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.issn=2193-8253&rft.eissn=2193-6536&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=105&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40120-023-00562-w&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon