Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial
Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepa...
Saved in:
Published in | Neurology and therapy Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 85 - 105 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Cheshire
Springer Healthcare
01.02.2024
Adis, Springer Healthcare |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Introduction
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.
Methods
In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.
Results
Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively;
P
= 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.
Conclusions
Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.
Trial registration
ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Plain Language Summary
Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions.
People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches.
Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Introduction
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.
Methods
In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.
Results
Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively;
P
= 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.
Conclusions
Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.
Trial registration
ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).
Plain Language Summary
Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions.
People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches.
Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity. Abstract Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. Methods In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Results Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Conclusions Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. Trial registration ClinTrials.gov—NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD). There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine. In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months. Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies. ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD). Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant in reducing the number of monthly migraine headaches and to determine if galcanezumab was better than rimegepant. The study provides important information to doctors and their patients when making treatment decisions. People with episodic migraine were assigned to the galcanezumab (given as an injection under the skin) or rimegepant (given as a tablet that dissolves in the mouth) group and treated for 3 months. The doctor and the patient did not know which group they were assigned to, and to keep it unknown to both, people in the galcanezumab group got an injection with real medicine and a fake tablet, and people in the rimegepant group got a tablet with real medicine and a fake injection. The researchers wanted to know how many people in each group had at least a 50% reduction in their monthly migraine headaches. Of the 580 people in the study, 287 were assigned to galcanezumab and 293 to rimegepant. In both groups, most were female and white. After 3 months of treatment, 62% of the people in the galcanezumab group and 61% of people in the rimegepant group had at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine headaches. Both treatments were effective, but galcanezumab was not better than rimegepant. About 20% of the people in each treatment group had a side effect from the medication, and most were mild or moderate in severity. There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.INTRODUCTIONThere have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention. Reported are the results from the first head-to-head study of two CGRP antagonists, galcanezumab (monoclonal antibody) versus rimegepant (gepant), for the prevention of episodic migraine.In this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.METHODSIn this 3-month, double-blind, double-dummy study, participants were randomized (1:1) to subcutaneous (SC) galcanezumab 120 mg per month (after a 240 mg loading dose) and a placebo oral disintegrating tablet (ODT) every other day (q.o.d.) or to rimegepant 75 mg ODT q.o.d. and a monthly SC placebo. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with a ≥ 50% reduction in migraine headache days per month from baseline across the 3-month double-blind treatment period. Key secondary endpoints were overall mean change from baseline in: migraine headache days per month across 3 months and at month 3, 2, and 1; migraine headache days per month with acute migraine medication use; Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive domain score at month 3; and a ≥ 75% and 100% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month across 3 months.Of 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.RESULTSOf 580 randomized participants (galcanezumab: 287, rimegepant: 293; mean age: 42 years), 83% were female and 81% Caucasian. Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant in achieving a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline in migraine headache days per month (62% versus 61% respectively; P = 0.70). Given the pre-specified multiple testing procedure, key secondary endpoints cannot be considered statistically significant. Overall, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 21% of participants, with no significant differences between study intervention groups.Galcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.CONCLUSIONSGalcanezumab was not superior to rimegepant for the primary endpoint; however, both interventions demonstrated efficacy as preventive treatments in participants with episodic migraine. The efficacy and safety profiles observed in galcanezumab-treated participants were consistent with previous studies.ClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD).TRIAL REGISTRATIONClinTrials.gov-NCT05127486 (I5Q-MC-CGBD). |
Author | Richardson, Diane R. Vargas, Bert B. Pandey, Hitendra Myers Oakes, Tina M. Cobas Meyer, Michael Goadsby, Peter J. Schwedt, Todd J. Martinez, James M. Varnado, Oralee J. Pearlman, Eric M. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Todd J. surname: Schwedt fullname: Schwedt, Todd J. organization: Mayo Clinic – sequence: 2 givenname: Tina M. orcidid: 0009-0008-4507-6056 surname: Myers Oakes fullname: Myers Oakes, Tina M. email: oakes_tina_marie_myers@lilly.com organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 3 givenname: James M. surname: Martinez fullname: Martinez, James M. organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 4 givenname: Bert B. surname: Vargas fullname: Vargas, Bert B. organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 5 givenname: Hitendra surname: Pandey fullname: Pandey, Hitendra organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 6 givenname: Eric M. surname: Pearlman fullname: Pearlman, Eric M. organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 7 givenname: Diane R. surname: Richardson fullname: Richardson, Diane R. organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 8 givenname: Oralee J. surname: Varnado fullname: Varnado, Oralee J. organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 9 givenname: Michael surname: Cobas Meyer fullname: Cobas Meyer, Michael organization: Eli Lilly and Company – sequence: 10 givenname: Peter J. surname: Goadsby fullname: Goadsby, Peter J. organization: NIHR King’s Clinical Research Facility and Headache Group, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, Department of Neurology, University of California |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948006$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9UstuEzEUHaEiWkp_gAXykgUDfszDwwahKJRKRaBQ2Fo3nuvUlccO9kyr9F_4V5wmVJRFV7auz-PK5zwvDnzwWBQvGX3LKG3fpYoyTkvKRUlp3fDy5klxxFknyqYWzcH-LnktDouTlOySVlVbV4LJZ8WhaLtKUtocFb9nYVhDtH5Fxkskc2OsBr0h4HvyHQyOGxIMOQWnwePtNMCS_MSYpkQWdsAVrsGPxIRIvkW8Rj_a4LeE-dqm0FtNvthVBOvxPVlgmtyYiIlhIEAW2SEM9hb7N2QW_BiDc9iTmbM-b-DIRbTgXhRPDbiEJ_vzuPjxaX4x-1yefz09m308L3XDqrFsJUjoeuSINQpoUDc1VjXUnHdVs-xkYzoGrO9kHgjRt1QY6A1iJZslbStxXJztdPsAV2od7QBxowJYdTcIcaUgjlY7VAaYxh6MxkykRgLHzuQEWNtCy5Yia33Yaa2n5YC9zp8SwT0Qffji7aVahWvFaCvbpumywuu9Qgy_JkyjGmzS6FyOIExJcSk7XlWi4xn66l-ze5e_AWcA3wF0DClFNPcQRtW2SGpXJJWLpO6KpG4ySf5H0naEbbZ5Yesep4odNa23pcKorsIUfQ7vMdYf61zgsw |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_37667_pk_2023_1274 crossref_primary_10_2147_DDDT_S499848 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2401558 crossref_primary_10_1177_03331024241269735 crossref_primary_10_62087_hpr_2024_0030 crossref_primary_10_1111_head_14824 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2332754 crossref_primary_10_3389_fneur_2024_1402569 crossref_primary_10_1080_14737175_2024_2434079 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_024_01925_w crossref_primary_10_1016_S0140_6736_25_00109_6 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_024_03072_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_023_01698_8 crossref_primary_10_1080_14712598_2025_2456464 crossref_primary_10_1080_17512433_2024_2417655 crossref_primary_10_1186_s10194_024_01889_x crossref_primary_10_1111_head_14692 crossref_primary_10_1080_14656566_2024_2349791 crossref_primary_10_1177_03331024241298642 |
Cites_doi | 10.1177/0333102413500727 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3859 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640 10.1177/0333102420905132 10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1 10.2307/2533558 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9 10.1177/0333102417738202 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7 10.1001/jama.2018.4853 10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2 10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000771 10.1177/03331024211047454 10.1002/sim.5537 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848 10.1177/0333102410388435 10.1177/0333102419835459 10.1177/0333102418779543 10.1007/s00415-004-0464-6 10.1177/0333102418788347 10.1198/sbr.2010.09014 10.1056/NEJMoa030505 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-9 10.1056/NEJMoa2035908 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-0 10.1177/0333102416653233 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X 10.1177/0333102411398399 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212 10.1177/03331024211053571 10.1002/sim.3495 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2023 2023. The Author(s). |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023 – notice: 2023. The Author(s). |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature Open Access Journals CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | PubMed MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 2193-6536 |
EndPage | 105 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3 PMC10787669 37948006 10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: Eli Lilly and Company funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004312 |
GroupedDBID | -A0 0R~ 2VQ 3V. 53G 5VS 7RV 7X7 8AO 8FI 8FJ AAKKN ABDBF ABEEZ ABUWG ACACY ACGFS ACUHS ACULB ADBBV ADINQ ADRAZ AFGXO AFKRA AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AOIJS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BKEYQ BPHCQ BVXVI C24 C6C CCPQU DIK DWQXO EBS EJD FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ HMCUK HYE HZ~ IAO IHR ISR ITC KQ8 M2M M48 M~E NAPCQ O9- OK1 PGMZT PIMPY PQQKQ PROAC PSYQQ RPM RSV SISQX SMD SOJ UKHRP ~JE AAYXX CITATION PHGZM PHGZT NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c614t-78a8a9de2ee5e3a6ec65e45a522946b986f91a1d9822933d703fadfee486b0743 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 2193-8253 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:28:42 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:35:50 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:26:39 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:32:15 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:53:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:59:09 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:41:23 EST 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Prevention Rimegepant Comparative efficacy Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) Migraine CGRP antagonist Head-to-head Galcanezumab Gepant Clinical study |
Language | English |
License | 2023. The Author(s). Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c614t-78a8a9de2ee5e3a6ec65e45a522946b986f91a1d9822933d703fadfee486b0743 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ORCID | 0009-0008-4507-6056 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w |
PMID | 37948006 |
PQID | 2889244392 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 21 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10787669 proquest_miscellaneous_2889244392 pubmed_primary_37948006 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w crossref_citationtrail_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w springer_journals_10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2024-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2024-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2024 text: 2024-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | Cheshire |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Cheshire – name: New Zealand |
PublicationTitle | Neurology and therapy |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Neurol Ther |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Neurol Ther |
PublicationYear | 2024 |
Publisher | Springer Healthcare Adis, Springer Healthcare |
Publisher_xml | – name: Springer Healthcare – name: Adis, Springer Healthcare |
References | StaufferVLDodickDWZhangQIEvaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol2018751080108810.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212298131476143119 GoadsbyPJReuterUHallstromYA controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraineN Engl J Med2017377212321321:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXms1Gq10.1056/NEJMoa170584829171821 MarcusRGoadsbyPJDodickDStockDManosGFischerTZBMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trialCephalalgia20143411412510.1177/033310241350072723965396 GoadsbyPJPaemeleireKBroessnerGEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia20193981782910.1177/033310241983545930982348 HoTWFerrariMDDodickDWEfficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trialLancet20083729656211521231:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFajs7nE10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-819036425 Eli Lilly and Company. Emgality [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2021. https://pi.lilly.com/us/emgality-uspi.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2023. Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:737–45. GoadsbyPJDodickDWAilaniJSafety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trialLancet Neurol2020197277371:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhs1ejsb7J10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-932822633 AshinaMTepperSBrandesJLEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia2018101611162110.1177/0333102418788347 SilbersteinSDStaufferVLDayKALipsiusSWilsonMCGalcanezumab in episodic migraine: subgroup analyses of efficacy by high versus low frequency of migraine headaches in phase 3 studies (EVOLVE-1 & EVOLVE-2)J Headache Pain201920751:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1yktbrJ10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x312530916734504Erratum in: J Headache Pain. 2019; 20:118 OlesenJDienerH-CHusstedtIWBIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study GroupCalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraineN Engl J Med2004350110411101:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitV2qur0%3D10.1056/NEJMoa03050515014183 SkljarevskiVMatharuMMillenBAEfficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trialCephalalgia2018381442145410.1177/033310241877954329848108 ReuterUEhrlichMGendollaAErenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine—a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trialCephalalgia20224210811810.1177/0333102421105357134743579 HoTWConnorKMZhangYRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for migraine preventionNeurology201483119589661:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFert7bJ10.1212/WNL.000000000000077125107879 AshinaMSaperJCadyREptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1)Cephalalgia20204024125410.1177/0333102420905132320754067066477 GuyWECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 19761976RockvilleNational Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch217222 JhingranPOsterhausJTMillerDWDevelopment and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life QuestionnaireHeadache1998382953021:STN:280:DyaK1c3lvVagtg%3D%3D10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x9595870 HewittDJAuroraSKDodickDWRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20113171272210.1177/033310241139839921383045 Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nurtec [package insert]. New Haven, CT: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2023. https://www.pfizermedicalinformation.com/en-us/nurtec-odt. Accessed 31 July 2023. VossTLiptonRBDodickDWA phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20163688789810.1177/033310241665323327269043 BenschopRJCollinsECDarlingRJDevelopment of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related painOsteoarthritis Cartil2014225785851:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvjt1Ckuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009Erratum in: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 22:1951. Nisenbaum ES [added] DienerHCBarbantiPDahlöfCReuterUHabeckJPodhornaJBI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II studyCephalalgia20113157358410.1177/033310241038843521172952 DodickDWSilbersteinSDBigalMEEffect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trialJAMA2018319199920081:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXpslerur4%3D10.1001/jama.2018.485329800211 AilaniJLiptonRBGoadsbyPJAtogepant for the preventive treatment of migraineN Engl J Med20213856957061:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFChsrvK10.1056/NEJMoa203590834407343 KenwardMGRogerJHSmall sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihoodBiometrics1997539839971:STN:280:DyaK2svntVGitw%3D%3D10.2307/25335589333350 DienerHCPlacebo effects in treating migraine and other headachesCurr Opin Investig Drugs20101173573920597189 DodickDWGoadsbyPJSpieringsELSchererJCSweeneySPGrayzelDSSafety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyLancet Neurol2014138858921:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtlCktrjF10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-025127173 MillenBADmitrienkoAChain procedures: a class of flexible closed testing procedures with clinical trial applicationsStat Biopharm Res20113143010.1198/sbr.2010.09014 LiptonRBCroopRStockEGRimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraineN Engl J Med20193811421491:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnsFGis7o%3D10.1056/NEJMoa181109031291516 Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251:943–50. SkljarevskiVOakesTMZhangQEffect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol20187518719310.1001/jamaneurol.2017.385929255900Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75:260 Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd ed. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38:1–211. MullenersWMKimBKLainezMJASafety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trialLancet Neurol2020198148251:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhvVKns7vE10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-932949542 StewartWFLiptonRBKolodnerKBSawyerJLeeCLibermanJNValidity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferersPain200088415210.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-511098098 KordzakhiaGDmitrienkoASuperchain procedures in clinical trials with multiple objectivesStat Medicine20133248650810.1002/sim.5537 PuleddaFSilvaEMSuwanlaongKGoadsbyPJMigraine: from pathophysiology to treatmentJ Neurol20232703654366610.1007/s00415-023-11706-13702983610267278 BretzFMaurerWBrannathWPoschMA graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test proceduresStat Medicine20092858660410.1002/sim.3495 DetkeHCGoadsbyPJWangSFriedmanDISelzlerKJAuroraSKGalcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN studyNeurology201891e2211e22211:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXisVGntr%2FO10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640304465966329331 FörderreutherSZhangQStaufferVLAuroraSKLáinezMJAPreventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studiesJ Headache Pain20181912110.1186/s10194-018-0951-2305941226755564 CroopRLiptonRBKudrowDOral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialLancet20213971026851601:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFantrY%3D10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-733338437 ChowdhuryDBansalLDuggalATOP-PRO study: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraineCephalalgia20224239640810.1177/0333102421104745434579560 T Voss (562_CR9) 2016; 36 TW Ho (562_CR10) 2014; 83 BA Millen (562_CR28) 2011; 3 PJ Goadsby (562_CR31) 2019; 39 SD Silberstein (562_CR39) 2019; 20 DJ Hewitt (562_CR7) 2011; 31 TW Ho (562_CR5) 2008; 372 RJ Benschop (562_CR18) 2014; 22 J Olesen (562_CR4) 2004; 350 WM Mulleners (562_CR17) 2020; 19 WF Stewart (562_CR24) 2000; 88 PJ Goadsby (562_CR36) 2020; 19 RB Lipton (562_CR21) 2019; 381 HC Detke (562_CR13) 2018; 91 DW Dodick (562_CR34) 2018; 319 R Croop (562_CR19) 2021; 397 M Ashina (562_CR32) 2018; 10 F Bretz (562_CR27) 2009; 28 R Marcus (562_CR8) 2014; 34 562_CR20 VL Stauffer (562_CR16) 2018; 75 562_CR41 V Skljarevski (562_CR14) 2018; 38 W Guy (562_CR25) 1976 PJ Goadsby (562_CR33) 2017; 377 562_CR40 562_CR22 562_CR1 M Ashina (562_CR35) 2020; 40 D Chowdhury (562_CR2) 2022; 42 MG Kenward (562_CR26) 1997; 53 G Kordzakhia (562_CR29) 2013; 32 S Förderreuther (562_CR38) 2018; 19 U Reuter (562_CR3) 2022; 42 V Skljarevski (562_CR15) 2018; 75 HC Diener (562_CR30) 2010; 11 P Jhingran (562_CR23) 1998; 38 F Puledda (562_CR11) 2023; 270 J Ailani (562_CR37) 2021; 385 DW Dodick (562_CR12) 2014; 13 HC Diener (562_CR6) 2011; 31 |
References_xml | – reference: SilbersteinSDStaufferVLDayKALipsiusSWilsonMCGalcanezumab in episodic migraine: subgroup analyses of efficacy by high versus low frequency of migraine headaches in phase 3 studies (EVOLVE-1 & EVOLVE-2)J Headache Pain201920751:CAS:528:DC%2BC1MXht1yktbrJ10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x312530916734504Erratum in: J Headache Pain. 2019; 20:118 – reference: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Nurtec [package insert]. New Haven, CT: Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2023. https://www.pfizermedicalinformation.com/en-us/nurtec-odt. Accessed 31 July 2023. – reference: PuleddaFSilvaEMSuwanlaongKGoadsbyPJMigraine: from pathophysiology to treatmentJ Neurol20232703654366610.1007/s00415-023-11706-13702983610267278 – reference: ReuterUEhrlichMGendollaAErenumab versus topiramate for the prevention of migraine—a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled phase 4 trialCephalalgia20224210811810.1177/0333102421105357134743579 – reference: Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society. The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd ed. Cephalalgia. 2018; 38:1–211. – reference: VossTLiptonRBDodickDWA phase IIb randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20163688789810.1177/033310241665323327269043 – reference: GoadsbyPJReuterUHallstromYA controlled trial of erenumab for episodic migraineN Engl J Med2017377212321321:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXms1Gq10.1056/NEJMoa170584829171821 – reference: DetkeHCGoadsbyPJWangSFriedmanDISelzlerKJAuroraSKGalcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN studyNeurology201891e2211e22211:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXisVGntr%2FO10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640304465966329331 – reference: Croop R, Goadsby PJ, Stock DA, et al. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of rimegepant orally disintegrating tablet for the acute treatment of migraine: a randomised, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394:737–45. – reference: DodickDWSilbersteinSDBigalMEEffect of fremanezumab compared with placebo for prevention of episodic migraine: a randomized clinical trialJAMA2018319199920081:CAS:528:DC%2BC1cXpslerur4%3D10.1001/jama.2018.485329800211 – reference: MullenersWMKimBKLainezMJASafety and efficacy of galcanezumab in patients for whom previous migraine preventive medication from two to four categories had failed (CONQUER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3b trialLancet Neurol2020198148251:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhvVKns7vE10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-932949542 – reference: Eli Lilly and Company. Emgality [package insert]. Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly and Company; 2021. https://pi.lilly.com/us/emgality-uspi.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2023. – reference: GoadsbyPJPaemeleireKBroessnerGEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in episodic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia20193981782910.1177/033310241983545930982348 – reference: ChowdhuryDBansalLDuggalATOP-PRO study: a randomized double-blind controlled trial of topiramate versus propranolol for prevention of chronic migraineCephalalgia20224239640810.1177/0333102421104745434579560 – reference: KenwardMGRogerJHSmall sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihoodBiometrics1997539839971:STN:280:DyaK2svntVGitw%3D%3D10.2307/25335589333350 – reference: SkljarevskiVMatharuMMillenBAEfficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 Phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trialCephalalgia2018381442145410.1177/033310241877954329848108 – reference: BenschopRJCollinsECDarlingRJDevelopment of a novel antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide for the treatment of osteoarthritis-related painOsteoarthritis Cartil2014225785851:STN:280:DC%2BC2cvjt1Ckuw%3D%3D10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009Erratum in: Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014; 22:1951. Nisenbaum ES [added] – reference: DienerHCPlacebo effects in treating migraine and other headachesCurr Opin Investig Drugs20101173573920597189 – reference: SkljarevskiVOakesTMZhangQEffect of different doses of galcanezumab vs placebo for episodic migraine prevention: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol20187518719310.1001/jamaneurol.2017.385929255900Erratum in: JAMA Neurol. 2018; 75:260 – reference: KordzakhiaGDmitrienkoASuperchain procedures in clinical trials with multiple objectivesStat Medicine20133248650810.1002/sim.5537 – reference: HewittDJAuroraSKDodickDWRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist MK-3207 in the acute treatment of migraineCephalalgia20113171272210.1177/033310241139839921383045 – reference: AilaniJLiptonRBGoadsbyPJAtogepant for the preventive treatment of migraineN Engl J Med20213856957061:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFChsrvK10.1056/NEJMoa203590834407343 – reference: Diener HC, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dahlof C, et al. Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis—results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control. J Neurol. 2004;251:943–50. – reference: OlesenJDienerH-CHusstedtIWBIBN 4096 BS Clinical Proof of Concept Study GroupCalcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist BIBN 4096 BS for the acute treatment of migraineN Engl J Med2004350110411101:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXitV2qur0%3D10.1056/NEJMoa03050515014183 – reference: CroopRLiptonRBKudrowDOral rimegepant for preventive treatment of migraine: a phase 2/3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialLancet20213971026851601:CAS:528:DC%2BB3MXhvFantrY%3D10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-733338437 – reference: FörderreutherSZhangQStaufferVLAuroraSKLáinezMJAPreventive effects of galcanezumab in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine are persistent: data from the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studiesJ Headache Pain20181912110.1186/s10194-018-0951-2305941226755564 – reference: DienerHCBarbantiPDahlöfCReuterUHabeckJPodhornaJBI 44370 TA, an oral CGRP antagonist for the treatment of acute migraine attacks: results from a phase II studyCephalalgia20113157358410.1177/033310241038843521172952 – reference: StewartWFLiptonRBKolodnerKBSawyerJLeeCLibermanJNValidity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferersPain200088415210.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-511098098 – reference: AshinaMTepperSBrandesJLEfficacy and safety of erenumab (AMG334) in chronic migraine patients with prior preventive treatment failure: a subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyCephalalgia2018101611162110.1177/0333102418788347 – reference: BretzFMaurerWBrannathWPoschMA graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test proceduresStat Medicine20092858660410.1002/sim.3495 – reference: MarcusRGoadsbyPJDodickDStockDManosGFischerTZBMS-927711 for the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, dose-ranging trialCephalalgia20143411412510.1177/033310241350072723965396 – reference: HoTWFerrariMDDodickDWEfficacy and tolerability of MK-0974 (telcagepant), a new oral antagonist of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor, compared with zolmitriptan for acute migraine: a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-treatment trialLancet20083729656211521231:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhsFajs7nE10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-819036425 – reference: AshinaMSaperJCadyREptinezumab in episodic migraine: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (PROMISE-1)Cephalalgia20204024125410.1177/0333102420905132320754067066477 – reference: HoTWConnorKMZhangYRandomized controlled trial of the CGRP receptor antagonist telcagepant for migraine preventionNeurology201483119589661:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhsFert7bJ10.1212/WNL.000000000000077125107879 – reference: MillenBADmitrienkoAChain procedures: a class of flexible closed testing procedures with clinical trial applicationsStat Biopharm Res20113143010.1198/sbr.2010.09014 – reference: LiptonRBCroopRStockEGRimegepant, an oral calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonist, for migraineN Engl J Med20193811421491:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXnsFGis7o%3D10.1056/NEJMoa181109031291516 – reference: JhingranPOsterhausJTMillerDWDevelopment and validation of the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life QuestionnaireHeadache1998382953021:STN:280:DyaK1c3lvVagtg%3D%3D10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x9595870 – reference: GuyWECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 19761976RockvilleNational Institute of Mental Health, Psychopharmacology Research Branch217222 – reference: StaufferVLDodickDWZhangQIEvaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trialJAMA Neurol2018751080108810.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212298131476143119 – reference: GoadsbyPJDodickDWAilaniJSafety, tolerability, and efficacy of orally administered atogepant for the prevention of episodic migraine in adults: a double-blind, randomised phase 2b/3 trialLancet Neurol2020197277371:CAS:528:DC%2BB3cXhs1ejsb7J10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-932822633 – reference: DodickDWGoadsbyPJSpieringsELSchererJCSweeneySPGrayzelDSSafety and efficacy of LY2951742, a monoclonal antibody to calcitonin gene-related peptide, for the prevention of migraine: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyLancet Neurol2014138858921:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXhtlCktrjF10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-025127173 – volume: 34 start-page: 114 year: 2014 ident: 562_CR8 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102413500727 – volume: 75 start-page: 187 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR15 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3859 – volume: 22 start-page: 578 year: 2014 ident: 562_CR18 publication-title: Osteoarthritis Cartil doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.009 – ident: 562_CR41 – volume: 91 start-page: e2211 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR13 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640 – volume: 40 start-page: 241 year: 2020 ident: 562_CR35 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102420905132 – volume: 270 start-page: 3654 year: 2023 ident: 562_CR11 publication-title: J Neurol doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1 – volume: 53 start-page: 983 year: 1997 ident: 562_CR26 publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2533558 – volume: 19 start-page: 814 year: 2020 ident: 562_CR17 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30279-9 – ident: 562_CR22 doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202 – volume: 11 start-page: 735 year: 2010 ident: 562_CR30 publication-title: Curr Opin Investig Drugs – volume: 38 start-page: 295 year: 1998 ident: 562_CR23 publication-title: Headache doi: 10.1046/j.1526-4610.1998.3804295.x – volume: 397 start-page: 51 issue: 10268 year: 2021 ident: 562_CR19 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32544-7 – volume: 319 start-page: 1999 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR34 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4853 – volume: 19 start-page: 121 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR38 publication-title: J Headache Pain doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0951-2 – volume: 20 start-page: 75 year: 2019 ident: 562_CR39 publication-title: J Headache Pain doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1024-x – volume: 83 start-page: 958 issue: 11 year: 2014 ident: 562_CR10 publication-title: Neurology doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000771 – volume: 42 start-page: 396 year: 2022 ident: 562_CR2 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/03331024211047454 – volume: 32 start-page: 486 year: 2013 ident: 562_CR29 publication-title: Stat Medicine doi: 10.1002/sim.5537 – volume: 372 start-page: 2115 issue: 9656 year: 2008 ident: 562_CR5 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61626-8 – volume: 377 start-page: 2123 year: 2017 ident: 562_CR33 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705848 – volume: 31 start-page: 573 year: 2011 ident: 562_CR6 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102410388435 – volume: 39 start-page: 817 year: 2019 ident: 562_CR31 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102419835459 – volume: 38 start-page: 1442 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR14 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102418779543 – ident: 562_CR1 doi: 10.1007/s00415-004-0464-6 – volume: 10 start-page: 1611 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR32 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102418788347 – volume: 3 start-page: 14 year: 2011 ident: 562_CR28 publication-title: Stat Biopharm Res doi: 10.1198/sbr.2010.09014 – ident: 562_CR40 – volume: 350 start-page: 1104 year: 2004 ident: 562_CR4 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030505 – start-page: 217 volume-title: ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology, revised 1976 year: 1976 ident: 562_CR25 – volume: 19 start-page: 727 year: 2020 ident: 562_CR36 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30234-9 – volume: 385 start-page: 695 year: 2021 ident: 562_CR37 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035908 – volume: 13 start-page: 885 year: 2014 ident: 562_CR12 publication-title: Lancet Neurol doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70128-0 – volume: 36 start-page: 887 year: 2016 ident: 562_CR9 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102416653233 – volume: 381 start-page: 142 year: 2019 ident: 562_CR21 publication-title: N Engl J Med doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811090 – ident: 562_CR20 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31606-X – volume: 31 start-page: 712 year: 2011 ident: 562_CR7 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/0333102411398399 – volume: 75 start-page: 1080 year: 2018 ident: 562_CR16 publication-title: JAMA Neurol doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212 – volume: 42 start-page: 108 year: 2022 ident: 562_CR3 publication-title: Cephalalgia doi: 10.1177/03331024211053571 – volume: 28 start-page: 586 year: 2009 ident: 562_CR27 publication-title: Stat Medicine doi: 10.1002/sim.3495 – volume: 88 start-page: 41 year: 2000 ident: 562_CR24 publication-title: Pain doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00305-5 |
SSID | ssib044754318 ssj0001340510 |
Score | 2.3733053 |
Snippet | Introduction
There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine... There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for migraine prevention.... Galcanezumab and rimegepant are preventive treatments for episodic migraine. The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy of galcanezumab and rimegepant... Abstract Introduction There have been no prior trials directly comparing the efficacy of different calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonists for... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 85 |
SubjectTerms | Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) CGRP antagonist Galcanezumab Gepant Head-to-head Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Migraine NCT NCT05127486 Neurology Original Research |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQiFd4yUjcqAVJvF6bG6y2VEjlsLRSb5Fjj5dI2aQiiar2v_BfmXGyqy6gcuGaxHLs-ez5_JhvGHvjNImAUPiZLp2QmbRCIy8WwXo6ZCPSQVsDJ1_V8Zn8cj47v5Hqi-6EjfLAY8e9CzZ14G1wgM7ufdA2AxOistTcztMy6nyiz7uxmEIkkYqdnLInj7stuST0UaY5ZCwCl0X5FEET4-gkhZAKdF-CpDEzcbnnpaKY_98Y6J8XKX87TY1O6ug-uzexS_5xbNUDdgeah-znYsw12Kw5sj2-JNEI6664bTz_ZgP0V7wN_LOtsZfhetjYktMu2tDxVbWBNfqrpufIbflW7qltqMDyoupaXzl-Uq0pzwR84CvohrrvOMWscMtXWEO7qa7BH_LFeCW-Bs8nKdKanxL4H7Gzo-Xp4lhMWRmEQ1fei7m22hoPGcAMcqvAqRnImUUiZ6QqjVbBpDb1JAxo8tzjlIKGDwBSq5IIy2N20LQNPGU8ZKUhgTultZJzZ0yZhpkOyMq08aXTCUu3VijcJFlOmTPqYie2HC1XoOWKaLniMmFvd2UuRsGOW7_-RMbdfUli2_EBQrCYIFj8C4IJe72FRoGDk05c0F7t0BWZ1ri-Rc6XJezJCJVdVTnOhMjWVcL0Hoj2_mX_TVN9jwLguGRHJ6ZMwg63eCumqae7pbHP_kdjn7O7GfK68eL6C3bQ_xjgJfKyvnwVh-AvxpsyNQ priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Springer Nature Open Access Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1La9wwEBZtCqWX0nfdFyr01pjWtixLvbVm01DYHrYJ5CZke7QxeO1Q24Tkv-S_ZsaPhU1DoFdbXtk7nzSfNJpvGPuUKxIBofQzleW-CIX1FfJi39mCgmxEOmhrYPlbHh6LXyfxySSTQ7kwN-L3X1pB2Z0-ehafVCtD__w-exAHUUJlGlKZztgh3Tox1Use91ciQXij2nLIUXxcCEVTzsztP7vjlwb5_ts4579HJ2_ETwe3dPCEPZ74JP8-AuApuwf1M_ZwOUXMn7OrdCw0WK85Uj2-IMUIm19wWxf8j3XQXfDG8Z-2wr8YLvuNzThtofUtX5UbWKOzqjuOxJbPWk9NTQ8szsq2wT74slxTkQn4xlfQ9lXXckpY4ZavsIdmU15Csc_T8Tx8BQWfdEgrfkTIf8GODxZH6aE_lWTwc_TjnZ8oq6wuIASIIbISchmDiC2yOC1kppV0OrBBQaqAOooKnE_Q6g5AKJkRW3nJ9uqmhteMuzDTpG4nlZIiybXOAhcrh5RM6SLLlceC2SAmn_TKqWxGZbZKy4MRDRrRDEY05x77vH3mbFTruLP1D7LztiUpbQ8XEIBmGrjG2SCHwroc8PW_OmVD0G5QNktsEmSRxz7OKDE4MincgvZq-taESuHiFglf6LFXI2q2XUU4DSJVlx5TO3jaeZfdO3V5Oqh_43odPZjUHtufoWemeae942Pf_F_zt-xRiPRtPJ_-ju11f3t4j_Sryz4M4-4a7mQk_Q priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Galcanezumab Versus Rimegepant for Prevention of Episodic Migraine: Results from a Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40120-023-00562-w https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37948006 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2889244392 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10787669 https://doaj.org/article/fa1cedafce0740f8a2e9f005177a71b3 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9NAEF615cIFFfEylGiRuFEjbG82u0gIQZRSIYVDaKTerPV6Nlhy7BI7KumBf8J_ZcaPoEBUiYsP8TM7M55vZz3fx9hLq4gEhNrPVGJ9EQrjK8TFvjMpLbIR6KDSwPSLPJ-Lz5fDywPWyx11A1jtndqRntR8lb_-8X3zHgP-3bYNTlAHqI_Zxydmy9C_PmR3MDONSNFg-gfuE7ed6DSV2xpMJMgnSX8OcYyPk6Wo66vZf9md3NVQ_O_Dpf9-XvnXGmuTus6O2b0Oc_IPrZPcZwdQPGC_xq0CYbHgiAH5hKgkjN1wU6T8q3FQb3jp-CeT49jDzXppEk61tXXFZ9kSFpjFipoj4uU9CVRZ0AmTq6wq08zyabYg9Ql4y2dQrfO64tTJwg2f4R3KZXYD6Skftx_K55DyjqA05xcUEg_Z_GxyMT73O60G32KCr_2RMsroFEKAIURGgpVDEEOD8E4LmWglnQ5MkBJdoI6iFF806A4OQCiZEIx5xI6KsoAnjLsw0UR7J5WSYmS1TgI3VA6xmtJpYpXHgt4Kse2IzElPI4-3FMyN5WK0XNxYLr722KvtOVctjcetR38k426PJAru5odytYi7iI6dCSykxlnAx3_jlAlBu4bybGRGQRJ57EXvGjGGLK3DoL3KdRWHSuGsF5Fg6LHHratsbxXh-xExvPSY2nGinWfZ3VNk3xpacJzIY2qT2mOnvb_FfTzd8mef_tfQPGN3Q4R1VN0OwhN2VK_W8BxhWZ0M2OE4FLSV40FT2hg00Ufbn5PfS-Qztw |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSMAF8SY8jcSNRiKJk7W5wWrLAt0elq3Um-Uk4yVSNqmaRFX7X_ivzCTOooWqEtfEjpPM2PPZM_MNY-8ySSQglH4m08wXoTC-RFzsW5OTk41ABx0NLI6S-bH4dhKfuKSwZox2H12S_Uq9TXYTlOfpo43xib8y9M9vslsC98wUyDf9wzlODHbCVU4eTloiQZpHVeYQrfi4JYpc9szVj92xUD2R_1Xo898gyr88qb2BOrjP7jlkyT8NqvCA3YDqIbu9cL7zR-zXdCg5WK05gj4-I-4Ik11wU-X8h7HQXvDa8i-mxJ8Nl93GpJwO07qGL4sNrNFsVS1HiMtH1qe6og6z06KpcQy-KNZUbgI-8iU0Xdk2nFJXuOFLHKHeFJeQ7_PpEBlfQs4dI2nJVzQHHrPjg9lqOvddcQY_Q4ve-hNppFE5hAAxRCaBLIlBxAbxnBJJqmRiVWCCnPgBVRTluLKg_C2AkElKuOUJ26vqCp4xbsNUEc9dImUiJplSaWBjaRGcSZWnmfRYMApEZ465nApolHrLudwLUaMQdS9Efe6x99s-pwNvx7WtP5Octy2Jc7u_UJ-ttZvC2pogg9zYDPD1P1hpQlC25zibmEmQRh57O2qJxjlKjheUV901OpQSt7kI_UKPPR20ZjtUhAsigvbEY3JHn3beZfdOVfzsecBx5462LFEe2x9VT7sVqLnmY5__X_M37M58tTjUh1-Pvr9gd0MEdUPU-ku215518ApBWZu-7ufgb1LsK9c |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Zb9QwELagSBUviLvhNBJvNCq5vDZvEHYpx1ZoaaW-WU4yXiJlk1WTVdX-F_4rM7nEQlWJ18SOk8zY843H8w1jr1NJJCCUfiaT1A390LgScbFrTUZBNgIdtDUwPxKHJ-GX0-j0jyz-9rT7EJLschqIpalsDtaZPRgT30LK-XTR3rjEZem75zfZLfRUPHK_YhEPGkVsdmFfRbnbdQlC0kKqOIfIxUX3KOgzaa5-7Ja1akn9r0Ki_x6o_Cuq2hqr2V12p0eZ_H2nFvfYDSjvs915H0d_wH7FXfnBcskRAPIp8UiY9IKbMuM_jIXmgleWfzIF_ni43KxMwmljbVPzRb6CJZqwsuEId_nAAFWV1GG6zusKx-DzfEmlJ-AdX0C9KZqaUxoLN3yBI1Sr_BKyfR53p-QLyHjPTlrwY5oPD9nJbHocH7p9oQY3ReveuBNppFEZ-AARBEZAKiIII4PYToUiUVJY5RkvI65AFQQZrjKoCxYglCIhDPOI7ZRVCXuMWz9RxHknpBThJFUq8WwkLQI1qbIklQ7zBoHotGcxp2IahR75l1shahSiboWozx32Zuyz7jg8rm39geQ8tiT-7fZCdbbU_XTW1ngpZMamgK__1krjg7It39nETLwkcNirQUs0zlcKwqC8qk2tfSnR5UUY6Dvscac141ABLo4I4IXD5JY-bb3L9p0y_9lygqMXj3ZNKIftD6qn-9WovuZjn_xf85ds9_vHmf72-ejrU3bbR3zXHWB_xnaasw08R3zWJC_aKfgbZk8wOg |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing+the+Efficacy+and+Safety+of+Galcanezumab+Versus+Rimegepant+for+Prevention+of+Episodic+Migraine%3A+Results+from+a+Randomized%2C+Controlled+Clinical+Trial&rft.jtitle=Neurology+and+therapy&rft.au=Schwedt%2C+Todd+J.&rft.au=Myers+Oakes%2C+Tina+M.&rft.au=Martinez%2C+James+M.&rft.au=Vargas%2C+Bert+B.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.issn=2193-8253&rft.eissn=2193-6536&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=105&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007%2Fs40120-023-00562-w&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1007_s40120_023_00562_w |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2193-8253&client=summon |