Comparative study on gut microbiota in three Anura frogs from a mountain stream

Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEcology and evolution Vol. 12; no. 4; pp. e8854 - n/a
Main Authors Chen, Zhuo, Chen, Jun‐Qiong, Liu, Yao, Zhang, Jie, Chen, Xiao‐Hong, Qu, Yan‐Fu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England John Wiley & Sons, Inc 01.04.2022
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Abundance
Amolops wuyiensis
Amphibians
Anura
Bacteria
bacterial similarity
bacterial transmission
Bar codes
Burkholderiaceae
Community Ecology
Comparative studies
Frogs
Gene sequencing
gut microbiota
Intestinal microflora
Microbial Ecology
Microbiota
Mountain streams
Odorrana graminea
Odorrana tormota
Proteobacteria
Relative abundance
Reptiles & amphibians
rRNA 16S
Similarity
Species
Species diversity
sympatric frogs
Sympatric populations
China
Anura
bacterial transmission
bacterial similarity
gut microbiota
sympatric frogs
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism‐related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study. These three Anura frogs are commonly observed on rocks near streams. These species are distributed along mountain streams and congregate in large numbers during the breeding reason in mountain streams. This will provide a good model for the study on the gut microbial differences in sympatric frogs.
AbstractList Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism‐related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study. These three Anura frogs are commonly observed on rocks near streams. These species are distributed along mountain streams and congregate in large numbers during the breeding reason in mountain streams. This will provide a good model for the study on the gut microbial differences in sympatric frogs.
Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota , O. graminea , and Amolops wuyiensis . In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia , Caballeronia , and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota , O. graminea , and A. wuyiensis , respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis . Metabolism‐related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study. These three Anura frogs are commonly observed on rocks near streams. These species are distributed along mountain streams and congregate in large numbers during the breeding reason in mountain streams. This will provide a good model for the study on the gut microbial differences in sympatric frogs.
Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism-related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.
Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely , , and . In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were , , and with the highest relative abundance in , , and , respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between and and between and . Metabolism-related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.
Abstract Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism‐related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.
Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism-related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota, O. graminea, and Amolops wuyiensis. In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia, Caballeronia, and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota, O. graminea, and A. wuyiensis, respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis. Metabolism-related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.
Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has been gaining recent traction. Here, 16S rRNA gene sequencing technology was employed to study the gut microbiota of three sympatric frog species, namely Odorrana tormota , O. graminea , and Amolops wuyiensis . In these three frog species, the most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, followed by Bacteroidetes, Verrucomicrobia, and Firmicutes. The most abundant family was Burkholderiaceae in three species. The most dominant genera were Burkholderia , Caballeronia , and Paraburkholderia with the highest relative abundance in O. tormota , O. graminea , and A. wuyiensis , respectively. No differences were observed in alpha diversity indexes among the three frog species. However, bacterial similarity of gut microbiota was significantly different between O. tormota and A. wuyiensis and between O. graminea and A. wuyiensis . Metabolism‐related gene function was predominantly enriched in the gut microbiota of the three evaluated frog species. From these findings, that the relative abundance of the gut microbiota and predicted gene functions differed in three species, we conclude that there were significant differences in the gut microbiota of the three species. Similar alpha diversity and interspecific bacterial similarity in the gut might be related to bacterial transmission among the three Anura frogs evaluated in this study.
Author Chen, Jun‐Qiong
Liu, Yao
Chen, Xiao‐Hong
Zhang, Jie
Chen, Zhuo
Qu, Yan‐Fu
AuthorAffiliation 3 12534 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology College of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China
1 College of Life Sciences Henan Normal University Xinxiang Henan China
4 College of Fisheries Henan Normal University Xinxiang Henan China
2 12568 The Observation and Research Field Station of Taihang Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Henan Province Xinxiang Henan China
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 3 12534 Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology College of Life Sciences Nanjing Normal University Nanjing Jiangsu China
– name: 4 College of Fisheries Henan Normal University Xinxiang Henan China
– name: 1 College of Life Sciences Henan Normal University Xinxiang Henan China
– name: 2 12568 The Observation and Research Field Station of Taihang Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Henan Province Xinxiang Henan China
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Zhuo
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Zhuo
  organization: The Observation and Research Field Station of Taihang Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Henan Province
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Jun‐Qiong
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Jun‐Qiong
  organization: Nanjing Normal University
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Yao
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Yao
  organization: The Observation and Research Field Station of Taihang Mountain Forest Ecosystems of Henan Province
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Jie
  surname: Zhang
  fullname: Zhang, Jie
  organization: Henan Normal University
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Xiao‐Hong
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Xiao‐Hong
  email: xhchen_xx@163.com
  organization: Nanjing Normal University
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Yan‐Fu
  orcidid: 0000-0002-0910-8953
  surname: Qu
  fullname: Qu, Yan‐Fu
  email: quyanfu@njnu.edu.cn
  organization: Nanjing Normal University
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475186$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ksFq3DAQhkVJadI0h75AEfTSHjaRLMmWL4WwbNNAIJf2LMb2eKPFlraSnLJvX3k3CUmgnYNmkL75mdHMe3LkvENCPnJ2zhkrLrBFca61km_IScGkWlSV0kfP4mNyFuOGZStZIVn1jhwLJSvFdXlCbpd-3EKAZO-RxjR1O-odXU-JjrYNvrE-AbWOpruASC_dFID2wa_jfI4U6OgnlyATMQWE8QN528MQ8ezBn5Jf31c_lz8WN7dX18vLm0VbcikXMjuNje7qSgjWlx0oXUrZVQzKrlYKEGqNjHeyBqlAC6ZZr4AVomGooRen5Pqg23nYmG2wI4Sd8WDN_sKHtYGQbDug6bI1BYAssZXAm1pyXjdlrkCxXjLIWt8OWtupGbFr0aUAwwvRly_O3pm1vzc1K3gteBb48iAQ_O8JYzKjjS0OAzj0UzRFqUpe60pWGf38Ct34Kbj8VXsqNyh4kalPzyt6KuVxbhn4egDyjGIM2D8hnJl5Lcy8FmZei8xevGJbm_LA_dyMHf6X8ccOuPu3tFktV2Kf8Rf9gcfg
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s12866_023_03150_y
crossref_primary_10_3390_microorganisms10122373
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2022_1062302
crossref_primary_10_3389_fmicb_2023_1079187
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13152413
crossref_primary_10_1093_femsre_fuad002
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13243879
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_8966
crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2023_2223
crossref_primary_10_3390_ani13081365
crossref_primary_10_3390_applmicrobiol4010013
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cbpa_2024_111764
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00284_024_03868_6
Cites_doi 10.1002/mbo3.749
10.3389/fmicb.2019.01912
10.3389/10.1007/s10682‐006‐9149‐1
10.1007/BF00299618
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.033
10.3389/fmicb.2020.00550
10.1186/s12866‐016‐0660‐4
10.1128/mSphere.00277‐17
10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.010
10.1111/1365‐2656.12973
10.1038/s41586‐019‐1065‐y
10.1002/mbo3.1004
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.038
10.1038/ncomms13699
10.1186/s42523‐021‐00094‐4
10.1111/1758‐2229.12092
10.1186/gb‐2011‐12‐6‐r60
10.1111/mec.15087
10.1007/s00394‐018‐1703‐4
10.1038/s41587‐019‐0252‐6
10.1002/pro.3715
10.1007/s00248‐018‐1146‐8
10.7717/peerj.10271
10.1128/AEM.01541‐09
10.1073/pnas.1905666116
10.1038/ismej.2013.200
10.3389/fimmu.2015.00512
10.1093/femsle/fnz241
10.1038/ncomms13329
10.3389/fmicb.2017.02670
10.1186/s12866‐021‐02259‐2
10.3389/fmicb.2020.02096
10.1111/mec.13730
10.1643/OT‐18‐040
10.1242/jeb.187559
10.1136/gut.2009.191320
10.1038/nmeth.3869
10.1186/s40168‐020‐00823‐y
10.2108/zs140142
10.1007/s00114‐016‐1348‐1
10.1002/mbo3.1095
10.1007/s00253‐018‐9465‐8
10.1186/s40104‐016‐0127‐3
10.1099/ijs.0.02873‐0
10.1038/nbt.2676
10.3390/microorganisms9091890
10.1111/eva.13152
10.1073/pnas.2100707118
10.1111/mec.15354
10.1371/journal.pone.0118632
10.1038/nature04416
10.1007/s11427‐020‐1750‐7
10.1186/s12864‐016‐3318‐6
10.1038/srep14862
10.1111/j.1758‐2229.2012.00393.x
10.1007/s00394‐017‐1445‐8
10.1002/mbo3.778
10.1111/jam.12663
10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106701
10.1007/s00359‐011‐0660‐7
10.1002/ece3.4029
10.1128/mSphere.00327‐17
10.1002/mbo3.670
10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
10.7717/peerj.6658
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2022 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
– notice: 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID 24P
AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
3V.
7SN
7SS
7ST
7X2
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
LK8
M0K
M7P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
RC3
SOI
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1002/ece3.8854
DatabaseName Wiley Online Library Open Access
CrossRef
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Ecology Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Environment Abstracts
Agricultural Science Collection
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Biological Science Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
Genetics Abstracts
Environment Abstracts
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
Genetics Abstracts
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
Ecology Abstracts
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Entomology Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
Environment Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList

Agricultural Science Database
PubMed

MEDLINE - Academic
CrossRef
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: 24P
  name: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  url: https://authorservices.wiley.com/open-science/open-access/browse-journals.html
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Ecology
DocumentTitleAlternate CHEN et al
EISSN 2045-7758
EndPage n/a
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_ddddb2aa46ec4a1b94119b6c6150f40a
PMC9021931
35475186
10_1002_ece3_8854
ECE38854
Genre article
Journal Article
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Natural Science Foundation of China
  funderid: 31872220; 32171498; U21A20192
– fundername: Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province
  funderid: 202300410222
– fundername: Key Scientific Research Project in University of Henan Province
  funderid: 21A240002
– fundername: Key Project of Science and Technology of Henan Province
  funderid: 172102310619; 202102110258
– fundername: Fund of HNNU
  funderid: 2021PL02
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 172102310619; 202102110258
– fundername: Key Scientific Research Project in University of Henan Province
  grantid: 21A240002
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 31872220; 32171498; U21A20192
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 2021PL02
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 202300410222
GroupedDBID 0R~
1OC
24P
53G
5VS
7X2
8-0
8-1
8FE
8FH
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAHHS
AAZKR
ACCFJ
ACCMX
ACGFO
ACPRK
ACXQS
ADBBV
ADKYN
ADRAZ
ADZMN
ADZOD
AEEZP
AENEX
AEQDE
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFRAH
AIAGR
AIWBW
AJBDE
ALAGY
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
ALUQN
AOIJS
ATCPS
AVUZU
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
D-8
D-9
DIK
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
GODZA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HYE
IAO
IEP
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M0K
M48
M7P
M~E
OK1
PIMPY
PROAC
RNS
ROL
RPM
SUPJJ
WIN
AAYXX
AFPKN
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
NPM
3V.
7SN
7SS
7ST
8FD
8FK
AAMMB
ABUWG
AEFGJ
AGXDD
AIDQK
AIDYY
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
RC3
SOI
7X8
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c6144-4c618eb8d97330f6da58644d70a6d955aea98e01d49a45a83080f5a023b0e8af3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 2045-7758
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:25:51 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:02:34 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:36:07 EDT 2025
Wed Aug 13 09:23:32 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:25:51 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 22:51:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:04:37 EDT 2025
Wed Jan 22 16:25:56 EST 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Keywords Anura
bacterial transmission
bacterial similarity
gut microbiota
sympatric frogs
Language English
License Attribution
2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c6144-4c618eb8d97330f6da58644d70a6d955aea98e01d49a45a83080f5a023b0e8af3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0002-0910-8953
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1002/ece3.8854
PMID 35475186
PQID 2656023312
PQPubID 2034651
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ddddb2aa46ec4a1b94119b6c6150f40a
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_9021931
proquest_miscellaneous_2656198747
proquest_journals_2656023312
pubmed_primary_35475186
crossref_primary_10_1002_ece3_8854
crossref_citationtrail_10_1002_ece3_8854
wiley_primary_10_1002_ece3_8854_ECE38854
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate April 2022
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2022-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2022
  text: April 2022
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
– name: Bognor Regis
– name: Hoboken
PublicationTitle Ecology and evolution
PublicationTitleAlternate Ecol Evol
PublicationYear 2022
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc
John Wiley and Sons Inc
Wiley
Publisher_xml – name: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
– name: John Wiley and Sons Inc
– name: Wiley
References 2021; 21
2017; 2
2021; 64
2019; 10
2011; 60
2018; 642
2015; 32
2019; 366
2011; 12
2020; 11
2019; 568
2016; 103
2013; 5
2011; 197
2020; 8
2018; 8
1984; 14
2021; 118
2020; 9
2019; 28
2019; 116
2006; 440
2007; 2
2014; 8
2007; 21
2018; 76
2021; 9
2019; 8
2019; 7
2018; 221
2014; 117
2015; 6
2015; 5
2021; 3
2019; 75
2019; 37
2015; 10
2009
2019; 103
2020; 144
2019; 107
2016; 17
2016; 16
2016; 13
2004; 54
2021; 14
2016; 7
2019; 180
2019; 88
2020
2013; 31
2014; 30
2016; 25
2020; 29
2018; 57
e_1_2_10_23_1
e_1_2_10_46_1
e_1_2_10_21_1
e_1_2_10_44_1
e_1_2_10_42_1
e_1_2_10_40_1
e_1_2_10_2_1
e_1_2_10_4_1
e_1_2_10_18_1
e_1_2_10_53_1
e_1_2_10_6_1
e_1_2_10_39_1
e_1_2_10_55_1
e_1_2_10_8_1
e_1_2_10_14_1
e_1_2_10_37_1
e_1_2_10_57_1
e_1_2_10_58_1
e_1_2_10_13_1
e_1_2_10_34_1
e_1_2_10_11_1
e_1_2_10_32_1
e_1_2_10_30_1
e_1_2_10_51_1
Fei L. (e_1_2_10_16_1) 2009
e_1_2_10_61_1
e_1_2_10_29_1
e_1_2_10_63_1
e_1_2_10_27_1
e_1_2_10_65_1
e_1_2_10_25_1
e_1_2_10_48_1
e_1_2_10_67_1
e_1_2_10_24_1
e_1_2_10_45_1
e_1_2_10_22_1
R Development Core Team (e_1_2_10_36_1) 2020
e_1_2_10_43_1
e_1_2_10_20_1
e_1_2_10_41_1
e_1_2_10_52_1
e_1_2_10_3_1
e_1_2_10_19_1
e_1_2_10_54_1
e_1_2_10_5_1
e_1_2_10_17_1
e_1_2_10_38_1
e_1_2_10_56_1
e_1_2_10_7_1
e_1_2_10_15_1
e_1_2_10_12_1
e_1_2_10_35_1
e_1_2_10_9_1
e_1_2_10_59_1
e_1_2_10_10_1
e_1_2_10_33_1
e_1_2_10_31_1
e_1_2_10_50_1
e_1_2_10_60_1
e_1_2_10_62_1
e_1_2_10_64_1
e_1_2_10_28_1
e_1_2_10_49_1
e_1_2_10_66_1
e_1_2_10_26_1
e_1_2_10_47_1
e_1_2_10_68_1
35646320 - Ecol Evol. 2022 May 24;12(5):e8966
References_xml – volume: 117
  start-page: 1750
  issue: 6
  year: 2014
  end-page: 1760
  article-title: Comparative study on gastrointestinal microbiota of eight fish species with different feeding habits
  publication-title: Journal of Applied Microbiology
– volume: 103
  start-page: 461
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 472
  article-title: Heat stress mediates changes in fecal microbiome and functional pathways of laying hens
  publication-title: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
– volume: 25
  start-page: 3776
  issue: 16
  year: 2016
  end-page: 3800
  article-title: Microbiome evolution along divergent branches of the vertebrate tree of life: what is known and unknown
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– year: 2009
– volume: 221
  start-page: jeb.187559
  issue: 20
  year: 2018
  article-title: Environmental temperature alters the digestive performance and gut microbiota of a terrestrial amphibian
  publication-title: Journal of Experimental Biology
– volume: 75
  start-page: 7537
  issue: 23
  year: 2019
  end-page: 7541
  article-title: Introducing mothur: open‐source, platform‐independent, community‐supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities
  publication-title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology
– volume: 12
  start-page: R60
  issue: 6
  year: 2011
  article-title: Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation
  publication-title: Genome Biology
– volume: 30
  start-page: 614
  issue: 5
  year: 2014
  end-page: 620
  article-title: PEAR: a fast and accurate Illumina Paired‐End reAd mergeR
  publication-title: Bioinformatics
– volume: 8
  start-page: 4695
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  end-page: 4703
  article-title: Changes in intestinal microbiota across an altitudinal gradient in the lizard
  publication-title: Ecology and Evolution
– volume: 5
  start-page: 200
  issue: 2
  year: 2013
  end-page: 210
  article-title: Temporal stability of the mouse gut microbiota in relation to innate and adaptive immunity
  publication-title: Environmental Microbiology Reports
– volume: 440
  start-page: 333
  issue: 7082
  year: 2006
  end-page: 336
  article-title: Ultrasonic communication in frogs
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 76
  start-page: 565
  year: 2018
  end-page: 577
  article-title: Characterization of the gut microbiota in six geographical populations of Chinese rhesus macaques ( ), implying an adaptation to high‐altitude environment
  publication-title: Microbial Ecology
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1912
  year: 2019
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Effects of Captivity and Season on the Gut Microbiota of the Brown Frog ( )
  publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology
– volume: 366
  start-page: fnz241
  issue: 21
  year: 2019
  article-title: Comparison of the gut microbiota of and under natural winter fasting conditions
  publication-title: FEMS Microbiology Letters
– volume: 5
  start-page: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Habitat fragmentation is associated to gut microbiota diversity of an endangered primate: implications for conservation
  publication-title: Scientific Reports
– volume: 7
  start-page: 13699
  year: 2016
  article-title: Amphibian gut microbiota shifts differentially in community structure but converges on habitat‐specific predicted functions
  publication-title: Nature Communications
– volume: 28
  start-page: 1947
  issue: 11
  year: 2019
  end-page: 1951
  article-title: Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms
  publication-title: Protein Science
– volume: 60
  start-page: 34
  issue: 1
  year: 2011
  end-page: 40
  article-title: Acute appendicitis is characterised by local invasion with Fusobacterium nucleatum/necrophorum
  publication-title: Gut
– volume: 180
  start-page: 449
  year: 2019
  end-page: 456
  article-title: Exposure to cadmium induced gut histopathological damages and microbiota alterations of Chinese toad ( ) larvae
  publication-title: Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety
– volume: 9
  year: 2020
  article-title: Changes in the community structure of the symbiotic microbes in wild amphibians from the eastern edge of the Tibetan Plateau
  publication-title: MicrobiologyOpen
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  issue: 2096
  year: 2020
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Comparison of gut microbiota diversity and predicted functions between healthy and diseased captive
  publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology
– volume: 2
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  article-title: Ecophysiology of freshwater Verrucomicrobia inferred from Metagenome‐assembled genomes
  publication-title: mSphere
– volume: 116
  start-page: 23588
  issue: 47
  year: 2019
  end-page: 23593
  article-title: Covariation of diet and gut microbiome in African megafauna
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2653
  issue: 10
  year: 2019
  end-page: 2667
  article-title: Major shifts in gut microbiota during development and its relationship to growth in ostriches
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 9
  issue: 9
  year: 2020
  article-title: Captivity affects diversity, abundance and functional pathways of gut microbiota in the northern grass lizard
  publication-title: MicrobiologyOpen
– volume: 8
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  article-title: Comparison of intestinal microbes in female and male Chinese concave‐eared frogs ( ) and effect of nematode infection on gut bacterial communities
  publication-title: MicrobiologyOpen
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  end-page: 7
  article-title: From aquatic to terrestrial life: evolution of the mechanisms for water acquisition
  publication-title: Zoological Society of Japan
– volume: 118
  issue: 30
  year: 2021
  article-title: Surviving winter on the Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau: Pikas suppress energy demands and exploit yak feces to survive winter
  publication-title: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
– volume: 16
  start-page: 33
  year: 2016
  article-title: Changes of diet and dominant intestinal microbes in farmland frogs
  publication-title: BMC Microbiology
– volume: 8
  start-page: 830
  issue: 4
  year: 2014
  end-page: 840
  article-title: Microbial community dynamics and effect of environmental microbial reservoirs on red‐backed salamanders ( )
  publication-title: The ISME Journal Emultidisciplinary Journal of Microbial Ecology
– volume: 8
  issue: 7
  year: 2019
  article-title: Age‐related changes in the gut microbiota of the Chinese giant salamander ( )
  publication-title: MicrobiologyOpen
– volume: 6
  start-page: 512
  year: 2015
  article-title: Selective manipulation of the gut microbiota improves immune status in vertebrates
  publication-title: Frontiers in Immunology
– volume: 107
  start-page: 131
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  end-page: 137
  article-title: High‐throughput sequencing analysis reveals correlations between host phylogeny, gut microbiota, and habitat of wild frogs from a mountainous area
  publication-title: Copeia
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1
  issue: 550
  year: 2020
  end-page: 12
  article-title: Captivity influences gut microbiota in crocodile lizards ( )
  publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology
– volume: 8
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  article-title: Gut microbial diversity in two insectivorous bats: Insights into the effect of different sampling sources
  publication-title: MicrobiologyOpen
– volume: 29
  start-page: 829
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  end-page: 847
  article-title: Evolutionary signal in the gut microbiomes of 74 bird species from Equatorial Guinea
  publication-title: Molecular Ecology
– volume: 31
  start-page: 814
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  end-page: 821
  article-title: Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences
  publication-title: Nature Biotechnology
– volume: 7
  start-page: 68
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  article-title: Antimicrobial usage and resistance in beef production
  publication-title: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
– volume: 103
  start-page: 25
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  article-title: Gut bacterial communities across tadpole ecomorphs in two diverse tropical anuran faunas
  publication-title: Science of Nature
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1
  issue: Suppl 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 14
  article-title: The role of the microbiome for human health: from basic science to clinical applications
  publication-title: European Journal of Nutrition
– volume: 144
  year: 2020
  article-title: Phylogeography, speciation and demographic history: Contrasting evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear markers of the Odorrana graminea sensu lato (Anura, Ranidae) in China
  publication-title: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
– volume: 8
  issue: 12
  year: 2020
  article-title: The invasive red‐eared slider turtle is more successful than the native Chinese three‐keeled pond turtle: evidence from the gut microbiota
  publication-title: PeerJ
– volume: 7
  start-page: 13329
  year: 2016
  article-title: Akkermansia muciniphila mediates negative effects of IFN gamma on glucose metabolism
  publication-title: Nature Communications
– volume: 197
  start-page: 1027
  issue: 10
  year: 2011
  end-page: 1030
  article-title: Large odorous frogs ( ) produce ultrasonic calls
  publication-title: Journal of Comparative Physiology, A. Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral, Physiology
– volume: 2
  start-page: 204
  issue: 3
  year: 2007
  article-title: Host‐mediated inflammation disrupts the intestinal microbiota and promotes the overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae
  publication-title: Cell Host & Microbe
– volume: 57
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1
  year: 2018
  end-page: 24
  article-title: Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components
  publication-title: European Journal of Nutrition
– volume: 8
  start-page: 38
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  article-title: Most dominant roles of insect gut bacteria: digestion, detoxification, or essential nutrient provision?
  publication-title: Microbiome
– volume: 10
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  article-title: Longitudinal analysis of the premature infant intestinal microbiome prior to necrotizing enterocolitis: a case‐control study
  publication-title: PLoS One
– volume: 13
  start-page: 581
  issue: 7
  year: 2016
  end-page: 583
  article-title: DADA2: High‐resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data
  publication-title: Nature Methods
– volume: 642
  start-page: 45
  year: 2018
  end-page: 55
  article-title: Responses of soil microbial communities to nutrient limitation in the desert‐grassland ecological transition zone
  publication-title: Science of the Total Environment
– volume: 14
  start-page: 735
  issue: 3
  year: 2021
  end-page: 745
  article-title: Gut microbiomes of bigheaded carps and hybrids provide insights into invasion: A hologenome perspective
  publication-title: Evolutionary Applications
– volume: 5
  start-page: 899
  issue: 6
  year: 2013
  end-page: 903
  article-title: Restructuring of the amphibian gut microbiota through metamorphosis
  publication-title: Environmental Microbiology Reports
– volume: 64
  start-page: 88
  year: 2021
  end-page: 95
  article-title: Diet drives convergent evolution of gut microbiomes in bamboo‐eating species
  publication-title: Science China Life Sciences
– volume: 7
  year: 2019
  article-title: Comparative analysis and characterization of the gut microbiota of four farmed snakes from southern China
  publication-title: Peer J
– volume: 14
  start-page: 189
  issue: 3
  year: 1984
  end-page: 193
  article-title: Behavioral acquisition of the hindgut fermentation system by hatchling
  publication-title: Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 200
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  article-title: Composition and diversity of gut microbiota in in sexes and between developmental stages
  publication-title: BMC Microbiology
– volume: 3
  start-page: 33
  issue: 1
  year: 2021
  article-title: Host phylogeny and host ecology structure the mammalian gut microbiota at different taxonomic scales
  publication-title: Animal Microbiome
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1890
  issue: 9
  year: 2021
  article-title: Sympatric yaks and Plateau pikas promote microbial diversity and similarity by the mutual utilization of gut microbiota
  publication-title: Microorganisms
– volume: 8
  start-page: 2670
  year: 2018
  article-title: Composition and functional specialists of the gut microbiota of frogs reflect habitat differences and agricultural activity
  publication-title: Frontiers in Microbiology
– volume: 568
  start-page: 43
  issue: 7750
  year: 2019
  end-page: 48
  article-title: Structural variation in the gut microbiome associates with host health
  publication-title: Nature
– volume: 37
  start-page: 852
  issue: 8
  year: 2019
  end-page: 857
  article-title: Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2
  publication-title: Nature Biotechnology
– volume: 21
  start-page: 751
  issue: 6
  year: 2007
  end-page: 764
  article-title: Evolution of complex life cycles of amphibians: bridging the gap between metapopulation dynamics and life history evolution
  publication-title: Evolutionary Ecology
– volume: 17
  start-page: 1024
  issue: 13
  year: 2016
  article-title: Functional analysis for gut microbes of the brown tree frog ( ) in artificial hibernation
  publication-title: BMC Genomics
– year: 2020
– volume: 2
  issue: 5
  year: 2017
  article-title: The gut microbiota of healthy aged chinese is similar to that of the healthy young
  publication-title: mSphere
– volume: 88
  start-page: 845
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  end-page: 856
  article-title: Manipulation of gut microbiota during critical developmental windows affects host physiological performance and disease susceptibility across ontogeny
  publication-title: Journal of Animal Ecology
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1469
  year: 2004
  end-page: 1476
  article-title: Akkermansia muciniphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a human intestinal mucin‐degrading bacterium
  publication-title: International Journal of Systematic and Evolution Microbiology
– ident: e_1_2_10_42_1
  doi: 10.1002/mbo3.749
– ident: e_1_2_10_50_1
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01912
– ident: e_1_2_10_34_1
  doi: 10.3389/10.1007/s10682‐006‐9149‐1
– ident: e_1_2_10_51_1
  doi: 10.1007/BF00299618
– ident: e_1_2_10_13_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.033
– ident: e_1_2_10_47_1
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00550
– ident: e_1_2_10_9_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12866‐016‐0660‐4
– ident: e_1_2_10_21_1
  doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00277‐17
– ident: e_1_2_10_31_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.06.010
– ident: e_1_2_10_54_1
  doi: 10.1111/1365‐2656.12973
– volume-title: Anura
  year: 2009
  ident: e_1_2_10_16_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_59_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41586‐019‐1065‐y
– ident: e_1_2_10_57_1
  doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1004
– ident: e_1_2_10_58_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.038
– ident: e_1_2_10_4_1
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms13699
– ident: e_1_2_10_37_1
  doi: 10.1186/s42523‐021‐00094‐4
– ident: e_1_2_10_27_1
  doi: 10.1111/1758‐2229.12092
– ident: e_1_2_10_40_1
  doi: 10.1186/gb‐2011‐12‐6‐r60
– ident: e_1_2_10_53_1
  doi: 10.1111/mec.15087
– ident: e_1_2_10_32_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00394‐018‐1703‐4
– ident: e_1_2_10_5_1
  doi: 10.1038/s41587‐019‐0252‐6
– ident: e_1_2_10_25_1
  doi: 10.1002/pro.3715
– ident: e_1_2_10_64_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00248‐018‐1146‐8
– ident: e_1_2_10_35_1
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.10271
– ident: e_1_2_10_39_1
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.01541‐09
– ident: e_1_2_10_26_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.1905666116
– ident: e_1_2_10_30_1
  doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.200
– ident: e_1_2_10_33_1
  doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00512
– ident: e_1_2_10_49_1
  doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz241
– ident: e_1_2_10_20_1
  doi: 10.1038/ncomms13329
– ident: e_1_2_10_22_1
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02670
– ident: e_1_2_10_10_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12866‐021‐02259‐2
– volume-title: R: a language and environment for statistical computing
  year: 2020
  ident: e_1_2_10_36_1
– ident: e_1_2_10_48_1
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.02096
– ident: e_1_2_10_12_1
  doi: 10.1111/mec.13730
– ident: e_1_2_10_43_1
  doi: 10.1643/OT‐18‐040
– ident: e_1_2_10_18_1
  doi: 10.1242/jeb.187559
– ident: e_1_2_10_45_1
  doi: 10.1136/gut.2009.191320
– ident: e_1_2_10_6_1
  doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
– ident: e_1_2_10_24_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40168‐020‐00823‐y
– ident: e_1_2_10_46_1
  doi: 10.2108/zs140142
– ident: e_1_2_10_52_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00114‐016‐1348‐1
– ident: e_1_2_10_65_1
  doi: 10.1002/mbo3.1095
– ident: e_1_2_10_67_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00253‐018‐9465‐8
– ident: e_1_2_10_7_1
  doi: 10.1186/s40104‐016‐0127‐3
– ident: e_1_2_10_14_1
  doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02873‐0
– ident: e_1_2_10_28_1
  doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676
– ident: e_1_2_10_19_1
  doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091890
– ident: e_1_2_10_68_1
  doi: 10.1111/eva.13152
– ident: e_1_2_10_44_1
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.2100707118
– ident: e_1_2_10_8_1
  doi: 10.1111/mec.15354
– ident: e_1_2_10_66_1
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118632
– ident: e_1_2_10_17_1
  doi: 10.1038/nature04416
– ident: e_1_2_10_23_1
  doi: 10.1007/s11427‐020‐1750‐7
– ident: e_1_2_10_55_1
  doi: 10.1186/s12864‐016‐3318‐6
– ident: e_1_2_10_2_1
  doi: 10.1038/srep14862
– ident: e_1_2_10_15_1
  doi: 10.1111/j.1758‐2229.2012.00393.x
– ident: e_1_2_10_38_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00394‐017‐1445‐8
– ident: e_1_2_10_62_1
  doi: 10.1002/mbo3.778
– ident: e_1_2_10_29_1
  doi: 10.1111/jam.12663
– ident: e_1_2_10_11_1
  doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106701
– ident: e_1_2_10_41_1
  doi: 10.1007/s00359‐011‐0660‐7
– ident: e_1_2_10_63_1
  doi: 10.1002/ece3.4029
– ident: e_1_2_10_3_1
  doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00327‐17
– ident: e_1_2_10_56_1
  doi: 10.1002/mbo3.670
– ident: e_1_2_10_61_1
  doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
– ident: e_1_2_10_60_1
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.6658
– reference: 35646320 - Ecol Evol. 2022 May 24;12(5):e8966
SSID ssj0000602407
Score 2.3518233
Snippet Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric species has...
Abstract Composition and diversity in gut microbiota are impacted by a wide variety of factors. The similarity of gut microbiota in related or sympatric...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
wiley
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage e8854
SubjectTerms Abundance
Amolops wuyiensis
Amphibians
Anura
Bacteria
bacterial similarity
bacterial transmission
Bar codes
Burkholderiaceae
Community Ecology
Comparative studies
Frogs
Gene sequencing
gut microbiota
Intestinal microflora
Microbial Ecology
Microbiota
Mountain streams
Odorrana graminea
Odorrana tormota
Proteobacteria
Relative abundance
Reptiles & amphibians
rRNA 16S
Similarity
Species
Species diversity
sympatric frogs
Sympatric populations
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrZ1La9wwEIBFCQR6CU36cvNALT30ssTWw7aOybIhFJpcGshNjCw5Xeh6y8Z7yL_PjOTd7pKEXuqDbaxByKORZ2RJnxj7mrcl-n1Bg6xCj1Tp8TvYtoZwd03uvA5e0GrkH1fl5Y36fqtvN7b6ojlhCQ-cFHfq8XACQJWhUVA4o4rCuLIhkHmr8hgaoc_b6EylbzCxu6oVSigXp6EJEq1Cqy0HFDn9zwWXT-dIbsau0flcvGF7Q9TIz1Jp99mr0B2w3UkkTj-8ZdfjvwxvHoGxfN7xu2XPZ9MEWuqBTzveY8UFftYtF8Dbxfzuns4zDnxGO0YAStDSEZi9YzcXk5_jy9GwU8KooQ7dSOGlDq72ppIS1e9B1xjo-CqH0hutIYCpQ154ZUBpqCXGia0G9NcuDzW08j3b6eZd-Mi48Q4cZiIAO35QVISnqr0uaMEsZtNm7NtKfbYZMOK0m8VvmwDIwpKmLWk6Y1_Won8SO-M5oXOqg7UA4a7jAzQCOxiB_ZcRZOxoVYN2aIP3VhBXSEhZiIx9Xidj66EhEejCfJlk6LeLqjL2IVX4uiRSKxqTKjNWbZnCVlG3U7rpr0joNhg5GVmgrqLRvPz2djKeSLr59D_UcMheC1qdEScWHbGdfrEMxxgz9e4kNo9HW4kU3g
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3db5RAEJ_oNSa-GL9Fq1mND76Qwn4A-2TaC01jYjXGJn0jA7tcL_Gg3nEP_vfOAEe9WOUBCEw2uzOzs7Mf8xuA91Gd0LgveZNVmlAnjuxgXVuGu6ui0hnvJEcjfz5Pzi70p0tzOS64bcZjlTub2Btq11a8Rn4kGSVGKhXLj9c_Q84axburYwqNu3BAJjjLZnBwkp9__TatskQJY3ilO0ihSB75yivSDqP3BqIer_82J_Pvs5J_-rD9IHT6EB6M3qM4HsT9CO745jHcy3vk6V9P4Mv8Bstb9MCxom3EYtuJ1XIAXOpQLBvRkQC9OG62axT1ul1s-L4SKFacOQKJgkNIcPUULk7z7_OzcMyYEFY8sQs1PTJfZs6mSpEYHJqMHB6XRpg4awx6tJmPYqctaoOZIn-xNkh8LSOfYa2ewaxpG_8ChHUlllSIRJoAYpwyTFXmTMyBs1RMHcCHHfuKaoQT56wWP4oBCFkWzOmCOR3Au4n0esDQuI3ohGUwETDsdf-hXS-KsRcVjq5SIurEV1Sp0uo4tmVSMap9rSMM4HAnwWLsi5viRnMCeDv9pl7EWyPY-HY70PDyi04DeD4IfKqJMpr3ppIA0j1V2Kvq_p9medUjdVvyoKyKiVe90vy79UU-zxW_vPx_C17BfcnxF_3RoUOYdeutf01eUVe-GVX_N6j0DKQ
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Wiley Online Library Open Access
  dbid: 24P
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjZ1Lj5RAEIAr6xoTL8a36Gpa48HLZKEfQMfTOpnNxsTHwU32RqrpZpzEATPDHPz3VjUM68Q1kQMQKEjTRXVXP-prgLdpk1O9L3mQVZqZzj2Vg01jGXdXp86b4CVHI3_6nF9c6o9X5uoI3u9jYQY-xNThxpYRy2s2cHTb02toaKiDIjUbfQtuc2gtz-eT-uvUwZLmjO_icGkmrpMXaco9WSiVp9PTB_VRxPbf5Gv-PWXyT1c21kXn9-He6ESKs0HrD-AotA_hziICqH89gi_za6S3iPxY0bViuevFejVwl3oUq1b0pMcgztrdBkWz6ZZb3q8FijUvIIEkwZEkuH4Ml-eLb_OL2bhwwqzm9t1M06EMrvS2UIq04dGU5Pf4IsXcW2MwoC1DmnltURssFbmNjUGqvl0aSmzUEzhuuzY8A2G9Q0cvkUjtQMwKplWV3mQcP0uvaRJ4t8--qh6p4ry4xY9q4CHLinO64pxO4M0k-nNAadwk9IF1MAkw_Tpe6DbLajSmytPmJKLOQ02JclZnmXV5zXD7RqeYwMleg9VokttKMmZIKpXJBF5Pt8mYeIQE29DtBhnuhdFFAk8HhU8pUUbzEFWeQHHwKxwk9fBOu_oegd2WHCmrMsqr-NP8--urxXyh-OT5_4u-gLuSQzLibKITOO43u_CSHKXevYoG8RvxYw0r
  priority: 102
  providerName: Wiley-Blackwell
Title Comparative study on gut microbiota in three Anura frogs from a mountain stream
URI https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002%2Fece3.8854
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475186
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2656023312
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2656198747
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC9021931
https://doaj.org/article/ddddb2aa46ec4a1b94119b6c6150f40a
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjZ3da9swEMCPfjDYy9j33HVBG3vYSzZbH7b1MEYbUsqgXRkL9M3IlpwGGntzHWj_-93JdtawDJYHJ9hno9xJvpPl-x3A-7CM0e9zWmTlaixji_fBstSEuyvC3CpnOWUjn53HpzP59VJd7sBQY7NX4M3WqR3Vk5o11x9vf919wQH_uQeIfnKFE2hwJXdhHx1SQoUMzvoov7shE8iLEqeJvY7xpEoHxtD9szc8kwf4b4s6_3558n5Q673SyWN41IeT7Kiz_xPYcdVTeDD1KOq7Z_Bt8gfuzTxJltUVm69atlx0BKbWsEXFWrSoY0fVqjGsbOr5DW2XzLAllZIwKEE5JWb5HGYn0x-T03FfQmFc0ExvLPErdXlqdSIE2sUalWIEZJPQxFYrZZzRqQsjK7WRyqQCA8hSGXTkeehSU4oXsFfVlXsFTNvc5HgRbnBGaKKEuFWpVRFl0uJlygA-DOrLip4vTmUurrOOjMwz0nRGmg7g3Vr0ZwfV2CZ0TDZYCxAH2--om3nWD6vM4ifnxsjYFdioXMso0nlcEOa-lKEJ4HCwYDb0rYwTcIgLEfEA3q4P47CitRJTuXrVydDzGJkE8LIz-LolQklarIoDSDa6wkZTN49UiyuP7tYYUmkRoa58p_n3v8-mk6mgHwf_o6vX8JBTWoZ_o-gQ9tpm5d5gsNTmI9jl8mIE-8fT84vvI__IYeSHx281wRRD
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1Lb9QwEB6VrRBcEG8CBQwCicuqiWPncUCoXVJtabsg1Eq9uU7sLCuxSdnNCvVP8RuZyausKNyaQxLFI8cez9jjx3wD8MbNAxz3OW2ycjkUgcF-MM9jgrvL3NRIazh5Ix9NgvGJ-HQqTzfgV-cLQ8cquz6x7qhNmdEa-TYnlBju-x7_cP5jSFGjaHe1C6HRiMWBvfiJU7bl-_2P2L5vOd9LjkfjYRtVYJjR5Gco8BHZNDJxiHP5PDBaRmgUmNDVgYml1FbHkXU9I2ItpI58tKlyqfHfqWsjnfuY7w3YFD4WZwCbu8nky9d-VccNCDMs7CCMXL5tM-ujNEqxNvDV8QGuMmr_Ppv5p81cD3p7d-FOa62ynUa87sGGLe7DzaRGur54AJ9Hl9jhrAaqZWXBpquKzWcNwFOl2axgFQqMZTvFaqFZviinS7rPmWZzilShkYJcVvT8IZxcCy8fwaAoC_sEWGxSnWImXOOEU3shwWJFRnrkqIvZ5A6869insha-nKJofFcN8DJXxGlFnHbgdU963mB2XEW0S23QExDMdv2hXExVq7XK4JVyrUVgMyxUGgvPi9MgIxT9XLjaga2uBVWr-0t1KakOvOqTUWtpK0YXtlw1NLTcI0IHHjcN3pfEl4L2wgIHwjVRWCvqekox-1Yjg8doscW-h7yqhebftVfJKPHp5en_a_ASbo2Pjw7V4f7k4Bnc5uT7UR9b2oJBtVjZ52iRVemLVg0YnF235v0GSrFIaw
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwED-NTiBeEN8EBhgEEi9VE8dO4geEti7VxqBMiEl7C07slEo0GW0qtH-Nv467fI2KwdvykETJybLPd_ad7fsdwCs3D3De57TJyuVQBAbHwTxXBHeXuamR1nCKRv44DQ5OxPtTeboFv7pYGDpW2Y2J9UBtyozWyEecUGK473t8lLfHIo73J-_OfgwpgxTttHbpNBoRObLnP9F9W7093Me-fs35JP4yPhi2GQaGGTlCQ4GPyKaRUSH69XlgtIzQQDChqwOjpNRWq8i6nhFKC6kjH-2rXGqsR-raSOc-lnsNtkPyigawvRdPjz_3KzxuQPhhYQdn5PKRzayPkinFxiRY5wq4zMD9-5zmn_ZzPQFObsOt1nJlu42o3YEtW9yF63GNen1-Dz6NL3DEWQ1ay8qCzdYVW8wbsKdKs3nBKhQey3aL9VKzfFnOVnRfMM0WlLVCIwWFr-jFfTi5El4-gEFRFvYRMGVSnWIhXKPzqb2QILIiIz0K2sVicgfedOxLshbKnDJqfE8aEGaeEKcT4rQDL3vSswa_4zKiPeqDnoAgt-sP5XKWtBqcGLxSrrUIbIaVSpXwPJUGGSHq58LVDux0PZi048AquZBaB170v1GDaVtGF7ZcNzS09CNCBx42Hd7XxJeC9sUCB8INUdio6uafYv6tRglXaL0p30Ne1ULz79Yn8Tj26eXx_1vwHG6gxiUfDqdHT-AmpzCQ-gTTDgyq5do-ReOsSp-1WsDg61Ur3m-L_0yg
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative+study+on+gut+microbiota+in+three+Anura+frogs+from+a+mountain+stream&rft.jtitle=Ecology+and+evolution&rft.au=Chen%2C+Zhuo&rft.au=Chen%2C+Jun%E2%80%90Qiong&rft.au=Liu%2C+Yao&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Jie&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.issn=2045-7758&rft.eissn=2045-7758&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002%2Fece3.8854&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1002_ece3_8854
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=2045-7758&client=summon