Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low...
Saved in:
Published in | Management science Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 733 - 747 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Linthicum
INFORMS
01.03.2013
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior.
This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, behavioral economics. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior.
This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, behavioral economics. Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naive moviegoer behavior. Key words: decision analysis; game theory; economics; econometrics; marketing; competitive strategy; bounded rationality; psychology History: Received July 26, 2010; accepted March 6, 2012, by Brad Barber, behavioral economics. Published online in Articles in Advance September 4, 2012. Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Reprinted by permission of the Institute for Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS) Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naive moviegoer behavior. Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000—2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. |
Audience | Trade Academic |
Author | Lovallo, Dan Camerer, Colin F. Brown, Alexander L. |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Alexander L. surname: Brown fullname: Brown, Alexander L. – sequence: 2 givenname: Colin F. surname: Camerer fullname: Camerer, Colin F. – sequence: 3 givenname: Dan surname: Lovallo fullname: Lovallo, Dan |
BackLink | http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=742458873$$DView this record in ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften |
BookMark | eNqFkt1rFDEUxQep4Lb66psY8MUHZ00mk_nwrSzbVqgIWvExZDM3M1lnMm2SqfTdP7x3WO2HrEgg4V5-53C5OYfJgRsdJMlLRpcsq8r3gwt6yViGpSj4k2TBRFakQlB2kCwozUTKalo_Sw5D2FJKy6osFsmvdYh2UNG6lnyNftJx8qonn8YG-kBGQ9ZXk-3txttpIMo1ZDW2zkZ7DeTMgldedzfkorPux-xgHYkdkBMLffMB20BWKsBs893GrsMuOl9bbHv00OQLYPEzPE-eGtUHePH7PUq-nawvVmfp-efTj6vj81QXjMeUc2pMXlNTaSiY2GgqqDYN3xgqgDLamJpWWrBSC04FqxkAVA1VrBG0plrzo-TtzvfSj1cThCgHGzT0vXIwTkEyznFbVSkoom_-Qrfj5B1Oh1TGWVnl2QOqVT1I68wYvdKzqTzmOeNFnZczle6hWnC4vx7_0FhsP-KXe3g8DQxW7xW8eyDYTME6CHgF23YxtGoK4TH-eocDmtkgLz0mwN_IMs9yUVUlRyLfEdqPIXgwUtuIIRkdTmJ7yaicIyfnyMk5cnKO3P3gd7I_1v8UvNoJtiGO_o7O8B9qwbL7zc1L8EP4n98tbjbwcQ |
CODEN | MNSCDI |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3924209 crossref_primary_10_1177_0956797613511824 crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12145 crossref_primary_10_1515_jem_2019_0029 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1214534 crossref_primary_10_1287_mksc_2021_1325 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4666555 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijresmar_2015_10_003 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socec_2016_04_006 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4471458 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jebo_2017_06_001 crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_51955 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2021_103872 crossref_primary_10_1208_s12249_024_02970_z crossref_primary_10_1111_ecin_12198 crossref_primary_10_1287_mksc_1120_0770 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2942429 crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12498 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cor_2017_11_002 crossref_primary_10_1080_13662716_2024_2328004 crossref_primary_10_1509_jmr_14_0379 crossref_primary_10_1111_caje_12503 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2676402 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_019_09722_5 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jom_2018_04_003 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080213_041341 crossref_primary_10_1111_joie_12332 crossref_primary_10_5465_annals_2021_0025 crossref_primary_10_1080_1331677X_2022_2080734 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3384204 crossref_primary_10_1177_0743915619875419 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2445436 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2015_04_005 crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjad051 crossref_primary_10_1257_mic_20180217 crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2017_0661 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2011559 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3271248 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2312708 crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2380216 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2016_2655 |
Cites_doi | 10.2139/ssrn.1281006 10.1509/jmkr.46.5.612 10.1006/game.1995.1031 10.1257/aer.96.5.1737 10.1093/jleo/19.1.45 10.2307/3003562 10.1257/mic.3.3.1 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00034.x 10.1111/1468-0262.00239 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00631.x 10.1257/jel.48.4.935 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00810.x 10.1257/aer.97.5.1731 10.1257/aer.101.7.3130 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 10.1257/mic.4.2.1 10.1086/466995 10.1162/0033553041502225 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2013 INFORMS COPYRIGHT 2013 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 2013 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2013 INFORMS – notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences – notice: Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 2013 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION OQ6 N95 8BJ FQK JBE |
DOI | 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1563 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef ECONIS Gale Business: Insights International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences International Bibliography of the Social Sciences |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) |
DatabaseTitleList | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS) CrossRef |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Economics Psychology Business Film |
EISSN | 1526-5501 |
EndPage | 747 |
ExternalDocumentID | 2935354791 A341369470 742458873 10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563 23359512 mnsc.1120.1563 |
Genre | Research Article Feature |
GroupedDBID | 08R 0R1 1AW 1OL 29M 2AX 3EH 3R3 3V. 4 4.4 41 5GY 6XO 7WY 7X5 85S 8AO 8FI 8FJ 8FL 8VB AABCJ AAIKC AAPBV AAYJJ ABBHK ABEFU ABIVO ABNOP ABPPZ ABSIS ABTRL ABUFD ABUWG ABZEH ACDCL ACHQT ACNCT ACTDY ACVYA ACYGS ADBBV ADDCT ADGDI ADNFJ AEILP AENEX AETEA AEUPB AFDAS AFFDN AFFNX AFKRA AJPNJ AKVCP ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AQNXB AQSKT AQUVI AZQEC B-7 BBAFP BENPR BEZIV BPHCQ BVXVI CBXGM CCKSF CS3 CWXUR CYVLN DU5 DWQXO EBA EBE EBO EBR EBS EBU ECR EHE EJD EMK EPL F20 F5P FH7 FRNLG FYUFA G8K GENNL GNUQQ GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_ARCHIVE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH GUPYA HGD HVGLF H~9 IAO IEA IGG IOF IPO ISM ITC JAV JBC JPL JSODD JST K6 K60 L8O LI M0C M0T M2M MV1 N95 NEJ NIEAY P-O P2P PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS PROAC QWB REX RNS RPU SA0 SJN TH9 TN5 U5U UKR VOH VQA WH7 X XFK XHC XI7 XXP XZL Y99 YCJ YNT YZZ ZCG ZL0 -~X 18M AAAZS AAMNW AAWTO AAXLS ABAWQ ABDNZ ABKVW ABLWH ABXSQ ABYYQ ACGFO ACHJO ACXJH ADEPB ADMHG ADNWM ADULT AEGXH AEMOZ AFAIT AFTQD AGKTX AHAJD AHQJS AIAGR APTMU ASMEE BAAKF IPC IPSME IPY ISL JAAYA JBMMH JBZCM JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLEZI JLXEF JPPEU K1G K6~ OFU XSW .-4 41~ AAYOK AAYXX ABDPE ALIPV CCPQU CITATION LPU PHGZM PHGZT PQBIZ PQBZA PSYQQ UKHRP YYP AABXT OQ6 8BJ FQK JBE |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-330ff490f8ce615bc050cfd3bf05e010df908c517c5305191eee8d0a1d5090cc3 |
ISSN | 0025-1909 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 16:12:45 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 16 02:51:28 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:18:35 EDT 2025 Thu Jun 12 23:10:22 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:39:27 EDT 2025 Fri May 23 00:34:50 EDT 2025 Sat Mar 08 16:22:20 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:06:54 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:55:00 EDT 2025 Sun Aug 31 12:00:02 EDT 2025 Tue Jan 05 23:25:09 EST 2021 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 3 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c613t-330ff490f8ce615bc050cfd3bf05e010df908c517c5305191eee8d0a1d5090cc3 |
Notes | SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 content type line 23 |
PQID | 1323178420 |
PQPubID | 40737 |
PageCount | 15 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_citationtrail_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A341369470 jstor_primary_23359512 crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563 informs_primary_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563 proquest_miscellaneous_1335018750 gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A341369470 econis_primary_742458873 proquest_journals_1323178420 gale_infotracmisc_A341369470 gale_businessinsightsgauss_A341369470 |
ProviderPackageCode | Y99 RPU NIEAY CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2013-03-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2013-03-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2013 text: 2013-03-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Linthicum |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Linthicum |
PublicationTitle | Management science |
PublicationYear | 2013 |
Publisher | INFORMS Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
Publisher_xml | – name: INFORMS – name: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
References | B20 B21 B22 B23 B24 B25 B26 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8 B9 Nagel R (B19) 1995; 85 Lynch M (B15) 2001 McFadden D (B16) 1974 |
References_xml | – ident: B12 – ident: B9 – ident: B14 – ident: B10 – ident: B3 – ident: B20 – ident: B1 – ident: B7 – ident: B5 – ident: B25 – ident: B23 – ident: B21 – ident: B18 – ident: B16 – ident: B8 – ident: B11 – ident: B13 – ident: B2 – ident: B26 – ident: B4 – ident: B6 – ident: B24 – ident: B22 – ident: B17 – ident: B15 – ident: B19 – ident: B1 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1281006 – volume-title: Collected Papers on the Experimental Foundations of Economics and Political Science, Economists of the Twentieth Century year: 2001 ident: B15 – ident: B13 doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.5.612 – volume: 85 start-page: 1313 issue: 5 year: 1995 ident: B19 publication-title: Amer. Econom. Rev. – ident: B24 doi: 10.1006/game.1995.1031 – ident: B4 doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1737 – ident: B11 doi: 10.1093/jleo/19.1.45 – ident: B17 doi: 10.2307/3003562 – ident: B21 doi: 10.1257/mic.3.3.1 – ident: B22 doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00034.x – ident: B5 doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00239 – volume-title: Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior year: 1974 ident: B16 – ident: B10 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00631.x – ident: B9 doi: 10.1257/jel.48.4.935 – ident: B23 doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1 – ident: B7 doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00810.x – ident: B6 doi: 10.1257/aer.97.5.1731 – ident: B12 doi: 10.1257/aer.101.7.3130 – ident: B20 doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 – ident: B2 doi: 10.1257/mic.4.2.1 – ident: B14 doi: 10.1086/466995 – ident: B3 doi: 10.1162/0033553041502225 – ident: B25 doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8 |
SSID | ssj0007876 |
Score | 2.3014557 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice... Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice... |
SourceID | proquest gale econis crossref jstor informs |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 733 |
SubjectTerms | 2000-2009 bounded rationality Cognitive models competitive strategy Decision analysis Econometrics Economic equilibrium models Economic theory economics Equilibrium Experimental methods Experimentelle Ökonomik Film criticism Film industry Game theory Games Kognition Kritik Management science Market strategy marketing Microeconomics Modeling Motion picture industry Motion pictures Movies Multilevel models Parametric models psychology Revenue Spieltheorie Strategic planning (Business) Structural economics Studies USA |
Title | Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews |
URI | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23359512 http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=742458873 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1323178420 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1335018750 |
Volume | 59 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FFhAXxKtqoaBF4nGIXNav2OZWQqoKQUGolXqz7PW6jUScgmMOnPkV_FpmdsdrWymicLEse7Rre77MK_Ng7BloORkXkecEJYZuirxwcjfOncjF4dHgcsgCi5M_HE0OT4J3p-HpaPSrl7XUrPI9-ePSupL_4SpcA75ilew_cNYuChfgHPgLR-AwHK_E4xn8PtHi1CEB7AOre2jo4TY6Q0N9beY6p79ZUP1amyuEE7AR4mB7npvpCW3Co5lZTdkeMjOhfozWnsN1WBv06Fjq-QhU9lL37dsum2ZMunXN37clNWMbd55mC0Vjtac4RKhLN36__J7Rv0NvCccUosBxEX4_RNGlPWDm5McL9Y2y_NrkQpss2ntIEm39iCVO3gX7JekLb2onPu_79loSR6a_xpqG8DDGcrCoaonVUxhZIwE77Lq9j9p9kgSRuMY2PXBBQIZuvpkdffps9TyIukk7EBgfi1qCwgavhssPTJ7rGOeY19YCuGEa5NZtPuyaTaANneM77DZ5KHzfwO0uG6nqHrvZFkjcZz871PEOddygji9L3kMdh0_OLeq4RR1vUcfnFZwrrlH3Wp8i5nCZFnNcY44bzHHC3AN2cjA7nh46NMvDkWAwrhzfF2UZJKKMpQIjOpciFLIs_LwUoRKuKMpExDJ0Ixn66FW4Sqm4EJlbgEUrpPS32Ea1rNQ244UPXHEnWR7GZRDmXjLxhAxKUE6BinIV7jCn_dyppEb3OG_lS4oOL7AnRfakyJ4U2bPDXlr6C9Pi5Y-U24Z7li7CxAHQ03DrOfIzpdGxcKgxuFafZU1dpx2aYDNNh1yHh5IZVcHAq2EjtgHliwHlmWlDfxnh7oAQ9IMcrkMQ--vbbWkEWjLPx6p914MNWkimJP3q1PXBM4ziwIMNntrbuDdmbVZq2SCN7hcKTsnDK7_2I3arEyG7bANwrB6D3b_Kn9AP8DcguQl0 |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating+structural+models+of+equilibrium+and+cognitive+hierarchy+thinking+in+the+field%3A+the+case+of+withheld+movie+critic+reviews&rft.jtitle=Management+science&rft.au=Brown%2C+Alexander+L&rft.au=Camerer%2C+Colin+F&rft.au=Lovallo%2C+Dan&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.pub=Institute+for+Operations+Research+and+the+Management+Sciences&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287%2Fmnsc.1120.1563&rft.externalDocID=A341369470 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon |