Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews

Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inManagement science Vol. 59; no. 3; pp. 733 - 747
Main Authors Brown, Alexander L., Camerer, Colin F., Lovallo, Dan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Linthicum INFORMS 01.03.2013
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, behavioral economics.
AbstractList Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. This paper was accepted by Brad Barber, behavioral economics.
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naive moviegoer behavior. Key words: decision analysis; game theory; economics; econometrics; marketing; competitive strategy; bounded rationality; psychology History: Received July 26, 2010; accepted March 6, 2012, by Brad Barber, behavioral economics. Published online in Articles in Advance September 4, 2012.
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] Reprinted by permission of the Institute for Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS)
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000-2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naive moviegoer behavior.
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice provides a useful setting in which to test models of limited strategic thinking: Do moviegoers seem to realize that no review is a sign of low quality? A companion paper showed that in a set of all widely released movies in 2000—2009, cold opening produces a significant 20%-30% increase in domestic box office revenue, which is consistent with moviegoers overestimating quality of unreviewed movies (perhaps due to limited strategic thinking). This paper reviews those findings and provides two models to analyze this data: an equilibrium model and a behavioral cognitive hierarchy model that allows for differing levels of strategic thinking between moviegoers and movie studios. The behavioral model fits the data better, because moviegoer parameters are relatively close to those observed in experimental subjects. These results suggests that limited strategic thinking rather than equilibrium reasoning may be a better explanation for naïve moviegoer behavior.
Audience Trade
Academic
Author Lovallo, Dan
Camerer, Colin F.
Brown, Alexander L.
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Alexander L.
  surname: Brown
  fullname: Brown, Alexander L.
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Colin F.
  surname: Camerer
  fullname: Camerer, Colin F.
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Dan
  surname: Lovallo
  fullname: Lovallo, Dan
BackLink http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=742458873$$DView this record in ZBW - Deutsche Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften
BookMark eNqFkt1rFDEUxQep4Lb66psY8MUHZ00mk_nwrSzbVqgIWvExZDM3M1lnMm2SqfTdP7x3WO2HrEgg4V5-53C5OYfJgRsdJMlLRpcsq8r3gwt6yViGpSj4k2TBRFakQlB2kCwozUTKalo_Sw5D2FJKy6osFsmvdYh2UNG6lnyNftJx8qonn8YG-kBGQ9ZXk-3txttpIMo1ZDW2zkZ7DeTMgldedzfkorPux-xgHYkdkBMLffMB20BWKsBs893GrsMuOl9bbHv00OQLYPEzPE-eGtUHePH7PUq-nawvVmfp-efTj6vj81QXjMeUc2pMXlNTaSiY2GgqqDYN3xgqgDLamJpWWrBSC04FqxkAVA1VrBG0plrzo-TtzvfSj1cThCgHGzT0vXIwTkEyznFbVSkoom_-Qrfj5B1Oh1TGWVnl2QOqVT1I68wYvdKzqTzmOeNFnZczle6hWnC4vx7_0FhsP-KXe3g8DQxW7xW8eyDYTME6CHgF23YxtGoK4TH-eocDmtkgLz0mwN_IMs9yUVUlRyLfEdqPIXgwUtuIIRkdTmJ7yaicIyfnyMk5cnKO3P3gd7I_1v8UvNoJtiGO_o7O8B9qwbL7zc1L8EP4n98tbjbwcQ
CODEN MNSCDI
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3924209
crossref_primary_10_1177_0956797613511824
crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12145
crossref_primary_10_1515_jem_2019_0029
crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2023_1214534
crossref_primary_10_1287_mksc_2021_1325
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4666555
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijresmar_2015_10_003
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_socec_2016_04_006
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_4471458
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jebo_2017_06_001
crossref_primary_10_2308_accr_51955
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_euroecorev_2021_103872
crossref_primary_10_1208_s12249_024_02970_z
crossref_primary_10_1111_ecin_12198
crossref_primary_10_1287_mksc_1120_0770
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2942429
crossref_primary_10_1111_joes_12498
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cor_2017_11_002
crossref_primary_10_1080_13662716_2024_2328004
crossref_primary_10_1509_jmr_14_0379
crossref_primary_10_1111_caje_12503
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2676402
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11151_019_09722_5
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jom_2018_04_003
crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_economics_080213_041341
crossref_primary_10_1111_joie_12332
crossref_primary_10_5465_annals_2021_0025
crossref_primary_10_1080_1331677X_2022_2080734
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3384204
crossref_primary_10_1177_0743915619875419
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2445436
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cobeha_2015_04_005
crossref_primary_10_1093_qje_qjad051
crossref_primary_10_1257_mic_20180217
crossref_primary_10_1287_msom_2017_0661
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2011559
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_3271248
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2312708
crossref_primary_10_2139_ssrn_2380216
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2016_2655
Cites_doi 10.2139/ssrn.1281006
10.1509/jmkr.46.5.612
10.1006/game.1995.1031
10.1257/aer.96.5.1737
10.1093/jleo/19.1.45
10.2307/3003562
10.1257/mic.3.3.1
10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00034.x
10.1111/1468-0262.00239
10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00631.x
10.1257/jel.48.4.935
10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1
10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00810.x
10.1257/aer.97.5.1731
10.1257/aer.101.7.3130
10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
10.1257/mic.4.2.1
10.1086/466995
10.1162/0033553041502225
10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2013 INFORMS
COPYRIGHT 2013 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 2013
Copyright_xml – notice: 2013 INFORMS
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2013 Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
– notice: Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Mar 2013
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
OQ6
N95
8BJ
FQK
JBE
DOI 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1563
DatabaseName CrossRef
ECONIS
Gale Business: Insights
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
DatabaseTitleList

International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)
International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)




CrossRef
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Economics
Psychology
Business
Film
EISSN 1526-5501
EndPage 747
ExternalDocumentID 2935354791
A341369470
742458873
10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563
23359512
mnsc.1120.1563
Genre Research Article
Feature
GroupedDBID 08R
0R1
1AW
1OL
29M
2AX
3EH
3R3
3V.
4
4.4
41
5GY
6XO
7WY
7X5
85S
8AO
8FI
8FJ
8FL
8VB
AABCJ
AAIKC
AAPBV
AAYJJ
ABBHK
ABEFU
ABIVO
ABNOP
ABPPZ
ABSIS
ABTRL
ABUFD
ABUWG
ABZEH
ACDCL
ACHQT
ACNCT
ACTDY
ACVYA
ACYGS
ADBBV
ADDCT
ADGDI
ADNFJ
AEILP
AENEX
AETEA
AEUPB
AFDAS
AFFDN
AFFNX
AFKRA
AJPNJ
AKVCP
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AQNXB
AQSKT
AQUVI
AZQEC
B-7
BBAFP
BENPR
BEZIV
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CBXGM
CCKSF
CS3
CWXUR
CYVLN
DU5
DWQXO
EBA
EBE
EBO
EBR
EBS
EBU
ECR
EHE
EJD
EMK
EPL
F20
F5P
FH7
FRNLG
FYUFA
G8K
GENNL
GNUQQ
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_ARCHIVE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_COMPLETE
GROUPED_ABI_INFORM_RESEARCH
GUPYA
HGD
HVGLF
H~9
IAO
IEA
IGG
IOF
IPO
ISM
ITC
JAV
JBC
JPL
JSODD
JST
K6
K60
L8O
LI
M0C
M0T
M2M
MV1
N95
NEJ
NIEAY
P-O
P2P
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
PROAC
QWB
REX
RNS
RPU
SA0
SJN
TH9
TN5
U5U
UKR
VOH
VQA
WH7
X
XFK
XHC
XI7
XXP
XZL
Y99
YCJ
YNT
YZZ
ZCG
ZL0
-~X
18M
AAAZS
AAMNW
AAWTO
AAXLS
ABAWQ
ABDNZ
ABKVW
ABLWH
ABXSQ
ABYYQ
ACGFO
ACHJO
ACXJH
ADEPB
ADMHG
ADNWM
ADULT
AEGXH
AEMOZ
AFAIT
AFTQD
AGKTX
AHAJD
AHQJS
AIAGR
APTMU
ASMEE
BAAKF
IPC
IPSME
IPY
ISL
JAAYA
JBMMH
JBZCM
JENOY
JHFFW
JKQEH
JLEZI
JLXEF
JPPEU
K1G
K6~
OFU
XSW
.-4
41~
AAYOK
AAYXX
ABDPE
ALIPV
CCPQU
CITATION
LPU
PHGZM
PHGZT
PQBIZ
PQBZA
PSYQQ
UKHRP
YYP
AABXT
OQ6
8BJ
FQK
JBE
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c613t-330ff490f8ce615bc050cfd3bf05e010df908c517c5305191eee8d0a1d5090cc3
ISSN 0025-1909
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 16:12:45 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 16 02:51:28 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:18:35 EDT 2025
Thu Jun 12 23:10:22 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:39:27 EDT 2025
Fri May 23 00:34:50 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 16:22:20 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:06:54 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:55:00 EDT 2025
Sun Aug 31 12:00:02 EDT 2025
Tue Jan 05 23:25:09 EST 2021
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 3
Language English
LinkModel OpenURL
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c613t-330ff490f8ce615bc050cfd3bf05e010df908c517c5305191eee8d0a1d5090cc3
Notes SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
PQID 1323178420
PQPubID 40737
PageCount 15
ParticipantIDs crossref_citationtrail_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A341369470
jstor_primary_23359512
crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563
informs_primary_10_1287_mnsc_1120_1563
proquest_miscellaneous_1335018750
gale_infotracgeneralonefile_A341369470
econis_primary_742458873
proquest_journals_1323178420
gale_infotracmisc_A341369470
gale_businessinsightsgauss_A341369470
ProviderPackageCode Y99
RPU
NIEAY
CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2013-03-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2013-03-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 03
  year: 2013
  text: 2013-03-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Linthicum
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Linthicum
PublicationTitle Management science
PublicationYear 2013
Publisher INFORMS
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
Publisher_xml – name: INFORMS
– name: Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences
References B20
B21
B22
B23
B24
B25
B26
B10
B11
B12
B13
B14
B15
B16
B17
B18
B19
B1
B2
B3
B4
B5
B6
B7
B8
B9
Nagel R (B19) 1995; 85
Lynch M (B15) 2001
McFadden D (B16) 1974
References_xml – ident: B12
– ident: B9
– ident: B14
– ident: B10
– ident: B3
– ident: B20
– ident: B1
– ident: B7
– ident: B5
– ident: B25
– ident: B23
– ident: B21
– ident: B18
– ident: B16
– ident: B8
– ident: B11
– ident: B13
– ident: B2
– ident: B26
– ident: B4
– ident: B6
– ident: B24
– ident: B22
– ident: B17
– ident: B15
– ident: B19
– ident: B1
  doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1281006
– volume-title: Collected Papers on the Experimental Foundations of Economics and Political Science, Economists of the Twentieth Century
  year: 2001
  ident: B15
– ident: B13
  doi: 10.1509/jmkr.46.5.612
– volume: 85
  start-page: 1313
  issue: 5
  year: 1995
  ident: B19
  publication-title: Amer. Econom. Rev.
– ident: B24
  doi: 10.1006/game.1995.1031
– ident: B4
  doi: 10.1257/aer.96.5.1737
– ident: B11
  doi: 10.1093/jleo/19.1.45
– ident: B17
  doi: 10.2307/3003562
– ident: B21
  doi: 10.1257/mic.3.3.1
– ident: B22
  doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2171.2006.tb00034.x
– ident: B5
  doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00239
– volume-title: Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior
  year: 1974
  ident: B16
– ident: B10
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00631.x
– ident: B9
  doi: 10.1257/jel.48.4.935
– ident: B23
  doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1
– ident: B7
  doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00810.x
– ident: B6
  doi: 10.1257/aer.97.5.1731
– ident: B12
  doi: 10.1257/aer.101.7.3130
– ident: B20
  doi: 10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
– ident: B2
  doi: 10.1257/mic.4.2.1
– ident: B14
  doi: 10.1086/466995
– ident: B3
  doi: 10.1162/0033553041502225
– ident: B25
  doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
SSID ssj0007876
Score 2.3014557
SecondaryResourceType review_article
Snippet Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality, this practice...
Film studios occasionally withhold movies from critics before their release. Because the unreviewed movies tend to be below average in quality this practice...
SourceID proquest
gale
econis
crossref
jstor
informs
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 733
SubjectTerms 2000-2009
bounded rationality
Cognitive models
competitive strategy
Decision analysis
Econometrics
Economic equilibrium models
Economic theory
economics
Equilibrium
Experimental methods
Experimentelle Ökonomik
Film criticism
Film industry
Game theory
Games
Kognition
Kritik
Management science
Market strategy
marketing
Microeconomics
Modeling
Motion picture industry
Motion pictures
Movies
Multilevel models
Parametric models
psychology
Revenue
Spieltheorie
Strategic planning (Business)
Structural economics
Studies
USA
Title Estimating Structural Models of Equilibrium and Cognitive Hierarchy Thinking in the Field: The Case of Withheld Movie Critic Reviews
URI https://www.jstor.org/stable/23359512
http://www.econis.eu/PPNSET?PPN=742458873
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1323178420
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1335018750
Volume 59
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1Lb9NAEF6FFhAXxKtqoaBF4nGIXNav2OZWQqoKQUGolXqz7PW6jUScgmMOnPkV_FpmdsdrWymicLEse7Rre77MK_Ng7BloORkXkecEJYZuirxwcjfOncjF4dHgcsgCi5M_HE0OT4J3p-HpaPSrl7XUrPI9-ePSupL_4SpcA75ilew_cNYuChfgHPgLR-AwHK_E4xn8PtHi1CEB7AOre2jo4TY6Q0N9beY6p79ZUP1amyuEE7AR4mB7npvpCW3Co5lZTdkeMjOhfozWnsN1WBv06Fjq-QhU9lL37dsum2ZMunXN37clNWMbd55mC0Vjtac4RKhLN36__J7Rv0NvCccUosBxEX4_RNGlPWDm5McL9Y2y_NrkQpss2ntIEm39iCVO3gX7JekLb2onPu_79loSR6a_xpqG8DDGcrCoaonVUxhZIwE77Lq9j9p9kgSRuMY2PXBBQIZuvpkdffps9TyIukk7EBgfi1qCwgavhssPTJ7rGOeY19YCuGEa5NZtPuyaTaANneM77DZ5KHzfwO0uG6nqHrvZFkjcZz871PEOddygji9L3kMdh0_OLeq4RR1vUcfnFZwrrlH3Wp8i5nCZFnNcY44bzHHC3AN2cjA7nh46NMvDkWAwrhzfF2UZJKKMpQIjOpciFLIs_LwUoRKuKMpExDJ0Ixn66FW4Sqm4EJlbgEUrpPS32Ea1rNQ244UPXHEnWR7GZRDmXjLxhAxKUE6BinIV7jCn_dyppEb3OG_lS4oOL7AnRfakyJ4U2bPDXlr6C9Pi5Y-U24Z7li7CxAHQ03DrOfIzpdGxcKgxuFafZU1dpx2aYDNNh1yHh5IZVcHAq2EjtgHliwHlmWlDfxnh7oAQ9IMcrkMQ--vbbWkEWjLPx6p914MNWkimJP3q1PXBM4ziwIMNntrbuDdmbVZq2SCN7hcKTsnDK7_2I3arEyG7bANwrB6D3b_Kn9AP8DcguQl0
linkProvider ProQuest
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating+structural+models+of+equilibrium+and+cognitive+hierarchy+thinking+in+the+field%3A+the+case+of+withheld+movie+critic+reviews&rft.jtitle=Management+science&rft.au=Brown%2C+Alexander+L&rft.au=Camerer%2C+Colin+F&rft.au=Lovallo%2C+Dan&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.pub=Institute+for+Operations+Research+and+the+Management+Sciences&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287%2Fmnsc.1120.1563&rft.externalDocID=A341369470
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0025-1909&client=summon