Innovation processes: Which process for which project?

The innovation process has traditionally been understood as a predefined sequence of phases: idea generation, selection, development, and launch/diffusion/sales. Drawing upon contingency theory, we argue that innovation process may follow a number of different paths. Our research focuses on a clear...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inTechnovation Vol. 35; no. 1; pp. 59 - 70
Main Authors Salerno, Mario Sergio, Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos, Silva, Débora Oliveira da, Bagno, Raoni Barros, Freitas, Simone Lara Teixeira Uchôa
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Amsterdam Elsevier Ltd 01.01.2015
Elsevier Sequoia S.A
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The innovation process has traditionally been understood as a predefined sequence of phases: idea generation, selection, development, and launch/diffusion/sales. Drawing upon contingency theory, we argue that innovation process may follow a number of different paths. Our research focuses on a clear theoretical and managerial question, i.e., how does a firm organize and plan resource allocation for those innovation processes that do not easily fit into traditional models. This question, in turn, leads to our research question: Which configuration of innovation processes and resource allocation should be employed in a given situation, and what is the rationale behind the choice? Based on a large-scale study analyzing 132 innovation projects in 72 companies, we propose a taxonomy of eight different innovation processes with specific rationales that depend on a project׳s contingencies. •Not all innovation projects fit in the traditional linear process from-idea-to-launch.•Which configuration and rationale of the innovation process for which situation?•We researched 132 cases of innovation projects in 72 companies.•We propose eight types of innovation processes according to specific contingencies.•Uncertainties shape the structure and the content of the innovation process.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0166-4972
1879-2383
DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.07.012