Improving power in small-sample longitudinal studies when using generalized estimating equations

Generalized estimating equations (GEE) are often used for the marginal analysis of longitudinal data. Although much work has been performed to improve the validity of GEE for the analysis of data arising from small‐sample studies, little attention has been given to power in such settings. Therefore,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inStatistics in medicine Vol. 35; no. 21; pp. 3733 - 3744
Main Authors Westgate, Philip M., Burchett, Woodrow W.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Blackwell Publishing Ltd 20.09.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI10.1002/sim.6967

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Generalized estimating equations (GEE) are often used for the marginal analysis of longitudinal data. Although much work has been performed to improve the validity of GEE for the analysis of data arising from small‐sample studies, little attention has been given to power in such settings. Therefore, we propose a valid GEE approach to improve power in small‐sample longitudinal study settings in which the temporal spacing of outcomes is the same for each subject. Specifically, we use a modified empirical sandwich covariance matrix estimator within correlation structure selection criteria and test statistics. Use of this estimator can improve the accuracy of selection criteria and increase the degrees of freedom to be used for inference. The resulting impacts on power are demonstrated via a simulation study and application example. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliography:National Institutes of Health - No. UL1TR000117
ArticleID:SIM6967
istex:376CA02E89C7CA44979D27882214F3264B54E445
National Institute on Aging - No. R01 AG019241
Supporting Info ItemSupporting Info Item
National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
ark:/67375/WNG-CJ6CQGMD-Q
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0277-6715
1097-0258
1097-0258
DOI:10.1002/sim.6967