Impact of neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on antibiotic use within two tertiary healthcare centers
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study D...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of perinatology Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 394 - 397 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.04.2017
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0743-8346 1476-5543 1476-5543 |
DOI | 10.1038/jp.2016.236 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective:
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.
Study Design:
Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.
Results:
Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (
P
<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.
Conclusion:
Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Results:Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Conclusion:Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants [greater-than or slanted equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.OBJECTIVEA recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.RESULTSOf 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.CONCLUSIONUse of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants [greater-than or slanted equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants [egs]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants [succeeds/equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P [less than] 0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Journal of Perinatology (2017) 37, 394-397; doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.236; published online 22 December 2016 Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants [= or >, slanted]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Results:Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Conclusion:Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines ( P <0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants [succeeds/equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P [less than] 0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Warren, S Garcia, M Hankins, C |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: S surname: Warren fullname: Warren, S email: staci.warren@providence.org organization: Providence St. Vincent Medical Center – sequence: 2 givenname: M surname: Garcia fullname: Garcia, M organization: Providence Portland Medical Center – sequence: 3 givenname: C surname: Hankins fullname: Hankins, C organization: Providence St. Vincent Medical Center |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkt1rHCEUxYeS0mzSPvW9CIVSaGc7jh-jjyH0IxDoS_ssjnsn6-LqVB1C_vs4bEI3YVmCD4L-zrle7zmrTnzwUFXvcbPEDRHfNuOybTBftoS_qhaYdrxmjJKTatF0lNSCUH5anaW0aZr5sntTnbaiaVjDyaKyV9tRm4zCgDwEr7N2CHR0d3XwCTJKMCabkNHOTE7nEFHwSPtsexuyNWhKgG5tXluP8m1AGWK2Ot6hNWiX10ZHQAZ8OU5vq9eDdgnePezn1d8f3_9c_qqvf_-8ury4rg3HONd8JblcdQM1bcdwBz3ue0419FSanmsqe9lDJwmBxrSsY2wYDOuwWOmu10AZOa8-73zHGP5NkLLa2mTAOV0anJLCQmLBMRfiBSjDXGJJcUE_PkM3YYq-NKJajhkjmPPuGIWF4JwS3Lb_qRvtQFk_hBy1mUurCy5kK6iU7ChFSw8MEzq3sDxAlbWCrTUlKIMt509sXyTYr_BpT7CbawpuyrYk5KnzUXDf8cPDL039FlZqjHZbMqMeU1kAvANMDClFGJSxWc8-5a3WKdyoOflqM6o5-aokv2i-PNM82h6mv-7oVCh_A3FvUAfwe4PuDS4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_021_04282_x crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2001_9012 crossref_primary_10_1093_jpids_piaa022 crossref_primary_10_1097_pq9_0000000000000235 crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2019_317165 crossref_primary_10_3233_NPM_180075 crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12030445 crossref_primary_10_1007_s40124_019_00190_9 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_020_00860_3 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1951215 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_019_0577_5 crossref_primary_10_14238_pi58_6_2018_286_97 crossref_primary_10_1177_1093526619855467 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1714582 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arcped_2020_11_009 crossref_primary_10_3233_NPM_200531 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_025_02209_0 crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8163396 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2017_11_045 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semperi_2020_151324 crossref_primary_10_1542_hpeds_2018_0265 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamapediatrics_2019_2825 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_018_0207_7 crossref_primary_10_4103_1673_5374_235059 crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2019_1651281 crossref_primary_10_2174_0118744346336095240906105203 crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1727279 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgar_2020_03_015 crossref_primary_10_1097_JPN_0000000000000360 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12519_021_00446_9 crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_2019_0589 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2019_04_062 crossref_primary_10_1111_jpc_14572 crossref_primary_10_1186_s13052_021_01028_1 crossref_primary_10_1016_S1473_3099_20_30490_4 crossref_primary_10_1111_jpc_15384 crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_018_3113_2 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2021_04_007 crossref_primary_10_1097_pq9_0000000000000480 crossref_primary_10_1542_hpeds_2017_0180 crossref_primary_10_1542_neo_21_8_e505 crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2018_316777 crossref_primary_10_3345_cep_2020_00094 |
Cites_doi | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246 10.1542/peds.2007-3423 10.1542/peds.2010-3464 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1 10.1542/peds.2012-0541 10.1542/peds.112.3.543 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007 10.1542/neo.16-5-e297 10.1542/peds.2015-2323 10.1542/peds.2013-1689 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017 COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2017 Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group – notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2017 – notice: Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017. |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QG 7QL 7RV 7T5 7T7 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8AO 8C1 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AN0 AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BHPHI C1K CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ H94 HCIFZ K9. KB0 LK8 M0S M1P M7N M7P NAPCQ P64 PHGZM PHGZT PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
DOI | 10.1038/jp.2016.236 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Animal Behavior Abstracts Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Nursing & Allied Health Database Immunology Abstracts Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Pharma Collection Public Health Database Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland British Nursing Database (Proquest) ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Natural Science Collection Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition) Biological Sciences ProQuest Health & Medical Collection PML(ProQuest Medical Library) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Biological Science Database Nursing & Allied Health Premium Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Central Essentials SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A) ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts Nursing & Allied Health Premium ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Research Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Pharma Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Public Health British Nursing Index with Full Text ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Medical Library Animal Behavior Abstracts Immunology Abstracts ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | ProQuest Central Student MEDLINE - Academic AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts ProQuest Central Student MEDLINE |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1476-5543 |
EndPage | 397 |
ExternalDocumentID | 4321635549 A689284995 A489151348 28005063 10_1038_jp_2016_236 |
Genre | Multicenter Study Journal Article Comparative Study |
GeographicLocations | United States United States--US |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: United States – name: United States--US |
GroupedDBID | --- -Q- .GJ .XZ 04C 0R~ 29L 2FS 2WC 39C 3V. 4.4 406 53G 5GY 5RE 70F 7RV 7X7 88E 8AO 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8R4 8R5 AACDK AANZL AAQOH AAQQT AASML AATNV AAWTL AAYZH AAZLF ABAKF ABAWZ ABDBF ABJNI ABLJU ABPPZ ABUWG ABZZP ACAOD ACGFO ACGFS ACKTT ACMJI ACNCT ACPRK ACRQY ACUHS ACZOJ ADBBV ADFRT ADHDB AEFQL AEJRE AEMSY AENEX AEVLU AEXYK AFBBN AFKRA AFRAH AFSHS AGAYW AGHAI AGQEE AHMBA AHSBF AIGIU AILAN AJRNO ALFFA ALIPV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMYLF AN0 AXYYD BAWUL BBNVY BENPR BHPHI BKEYQ BKKNO BMSDO BNQBC BPHCQ BVXVI CAG CCPQU COF CS3 DIK DNIVK DPUIP DU5 E3Z EBLON EBS EE. EIHBH EIOEI EJD EMOBN ESX EX3 F5P FDQFY FERAY FIGPU FIZPM FSGXE FYUFA GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HZ~ IAO IHR IHW INH INR ITC IWAJR JSO JZLTJ KQ8 LGEZI LOTEE M1P M7P NADUK NAO NAPCQ NQJWS NXXTH O9- OK1 OVD P2P PCD PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO Q2X RNS RNT RNTTT ROL SNX SNYQT SOHCF SOJ SRMVM SV3 SWTZT TAOOD TBHMF TDRGL TEORI TR2 TSG TUS UKHRP WH7 WOW ZCG ZGI AAYXX ABBRH ABDBE ABFSG ACMFV ACSTC AEZWR AFDZB AFHIU AHWEU AIXLP ATHPR AYFIA CITATION PHGZM PHGZT CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM AEIIB PMFND 7QG 7QL 7T5 7T7 7U9 7XB 8FD 8FE 8FH 8FK ABRTQ AZQEC C1K DWQXO FR3 GNUQQ H94 K9. LK8 M7N P64 PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQUKI PRINS 7X8 |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-6d969d7f4c27517eb1bb64aeb49cb6a49b9be7933e0c25755ffc5718da7bae453 |
IEDL.DBID | 7X7 |
ISSN | 0743-8346 1476-5543 |
IngestDate | Fri Jul 11 03:34:59 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 18:56:06 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 14:36:10 EDT 2025 Sat Aug 23 12:22:32 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 20:55:40 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:40:50 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:17:03 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:39:41 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:08:45 EDT 2025 Thu May 22 21:25:14 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:02:45 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 00:56:59 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:03:12 EDT 2025 Fri Feb 21 02:39:04 EST 2025 |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 4 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c611t-6d969d7f4c27517eb1bb64aeb49cb6a49b9be7933e0c25755ffc5718da7bae453 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
PMID | 28005063 |
PQID | 1886643122 |
PQPubID | 30566 |
PageCount | 4 |
ParticipantIDs | proquest_miscellaneous_1891861688 proquest_miscellaneous_1851691941 proquest_journals_2615531667 proquest_journals_1886643122 gale_infotracmisc_A689284995 gale_infotracmisc_A489151348 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A689284995 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A489151348 gale_healthsolutions_A689284995 gale_healthsolutions_A489151348 pubmed_primary_28005063 crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_jp_2016_236 crossref_primary_10_1038_jp_2016_236 springer_journals_10_1038_jp_2016_236 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-04-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-04-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2017 text: 2017-04-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | New York |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: New York – name: United States |
PublicationTitle | Journal of perinatology |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | J Perinatol |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J Perinatol |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | Nature Publishing Group US Nature Publishing Group |
Publisher_xml | – name: Nature Publishing Group US – name: Nature Publishing Group |
References | Shakib, Buchi, Smith, Young (CR9) 2015; 15 Cotton, Taylor, Stoll, Goldberg, Hansen, Sanchez (CR5) 2009; 123 Higgins, Saade, Polin, Grobman, Buhimschi, Watterberg (CR12) 2016; 127 Puopolo, Draper, Wi, Newman, Zupancic, Lieberman (CR6) 2011; 128 Polin (CR1) 2012; 129 CR8 Escobar, Puopolo, Wi, Turk, Kuzniewicz, Walsh (CR7) 2014; 133 Deleon, Shattuck, Jain (CR2) 2015; 16 Benjamin, Delong, Steinbach, Cotton, Walsh, Clark (CR4) 2003; 112 Kuzniewicz, Walsh, Li, Fischer, Escobar (CR10) 2016; 42 Verani, McGee, Schrag (CR3) 2010; 59 Wortham, Hansen, Schrag, Hale, Van Meurs, Sanchez (CR11) 2016; 137 CM Cotton (BFjp2016236_CR5) 2009; 123 RD Higgins (BFjp2016236_CR12) 2016; 127 J Shakib (BFjp2016236_CR9) 2015; 15 MW Kuzniewicz (BFjp2016236_CR10) 2016; 42 RA Polin (BFjp2016236_CR1) 2012; 129 KM Puopolo (BFjp2016236_CR6) 2011; 128 C Deleon (BFjp2016236_CR2) 2015; 16 JR Verani (BFjp2016236_CR3) 2010; 59 DK Benjamin (BFjp2016236_CR4) 2003; 112 BFjp2016236_CR8 GJ Escobar (BFjp2016236_CR7) 2014; 133 JM Wortham (BFjp2016236_CR11) 2016; 137 25906702 - Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3):340-4 19117861 - Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):58-66 22547779 - Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):1006-15 12949281 - Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):543-7 27066927 - Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 May;42(5):232-9 22025590 - Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1155-63 26719293 - Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):null 21088663 - MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36 24366992 - Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):30-6 26855098 - Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):426-36 |
References_xml | – volume: 127 start-page: 426 issue: 3 year: 2016 end-page: 436 ident: CR12 article-title: Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of chorioamnionitis: summary of a workshop publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246 – volume: 123 start-page: 58 issue: 1 year: 2009 end-page: 66 ident: CR5 article-title: Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3423 – volume: 128 start-page: e1155 year: 2011 end-page: e1162 ident: CR6 article-title: Estimating the probability of neonatal early-onset infection on the basis of maternal risk factors publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3464 – ident: CR8 – volume: 42 start-page: 232 issue: 5 year: 2016 end-page: 239 ident: CR10 article-title: Development and implementation of an early-onset sepsis calculator to guide antibiotic management in late preterm and term neonates publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1 – volume: 59 start-page: 1 issue: RR-10 year: 2010 end-page: 36 ident: CR3 article-title: Prevention of perinatal group b streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC 2010 publication-title: MMWR Recomm Rep – volume: 129 start-page: 1006 year: 2012 end-page: 1015 ident: CR1 article-title: The Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0541 – volume: 112 start-page: 543 year: 2003 end-page: 547 ident: CR4 article-title: Empirical therapy for neonatal candidemia in very low birth weight infants publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.543 – volume: 15 start-page: 340 issue: 3 year: 2015 end-page: 344 ident: CR9 article-title: Management of newborns born to mothers with chorioamnionitis: is it time for a kinder, gentler approach? publication-title: Acad Pediatr doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007 – volume: 16 start-page: e297 issue: 5 year: 2015 end-page: e308 ident: CR2 article-title: Biomarkers of neonatal sepsis publication-title: Neoreviews doi: 10.1542/neo.16-5-e297 – volume: 137 start-page: e20152323 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: CR11 article-title: Chorioamnionitis and culture-confirmed, early-onset neonatal infections publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2323 – volume: 133 start-page: 30 year: 2014 end-page: 36 ident: CR7 article-title: Stratification of risk of early-onset sepsis in newborns ≥34 weeks’ gestation publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1689 – volume: 123 start-page: 58 issue: 1 year: 2009 ident: BFjp2016236_CR5 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3423 – volume: 128 start-page: e1155 year: 2011 ident: BFjp2016236_CR6 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3464 – volume: 15 start-page: 340 issue: 3 year: 2015 ident: BFjp2016236_CR9 publication-title: Acad Pediatr doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007 – volume: 127 start-page: 426 issue: 3 year: 2016 ident: BFjp2016236_CR12 publication-title: Obstet Gynecol doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246 – volume: 129 start-page: 1006 year: 2012 ident: BFjp2016236_CR1 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0541 – volume: 16 start-page: e297 issue: 5 year: 2015 ident: BFjp2016236_CR2 publication-title: Neoreviews doi: 10.1542/neo.16-5-e297 – volume: 59 start-page: 1 issue: RR-10 year: 2010 ident: BFjp2016236_CR3 publication-title: MMWR Recomm Rep – volume: 112 start-page: 543 year: 2003 ident: BFjp2016236_CR4 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.543 – volume: 42 start-page: 232 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: BFjp2016236_CR10 publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1 – ident: BFjp2016236_CR8 – volume: 133 start-page: 30 year: 2014 ident: BFjp2016236_CR7 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1689 – volume: 137 start-page: e20152323 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: BFjp2016236_CR11 publication-title: Pediatrics doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2323 – reference: 27066927 - Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 May;42(5):232-9 – reference: 19117861 - Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):58-66 – reference: 22025590 - Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1155-63 – reference: 21088663 - MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36 – reference: 26719293 - Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):null – reference: 25906702 - Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3):340-4 – reference: 24366992 - Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):30-6 – reference: 26855098 - Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):426-36 – reference: 22547779 - Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):1006-15 – reference: 12949281 - Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):543-7 |
SSID | ssj0014767 |
Score | 2.3523624 |
Snippet | Objective:
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from... A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use... Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from... Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from... |
SourceID | proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 394 |
SubjectTerms | 692/699/255/1318 692/700/1720 Age Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antibiotics Antiinfectives and antibacterials Birth Birth weight Blood Care and treatment Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.) Childbirth & labor Diagnosis Disease control Diseases Dosage and administration Drug therapy Electronic health records Female Gestational age Health aspects Humans Infant, Newborn Infants Infants (Newborn) Male Mathematical analysis Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Membranes Neonatal Sepsis - diagnosis Neonatal Sepsis - drug therapy Neonates Neutrophils Newborn babies original-article Pediatric Surgery Pediatrics Practice Guidelines as Topic Retrospective Studies Risk Factors Sepsis Tertiary Care Centers Testing United States |
Title | Impact of neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on antibiotic use within two tertiary healthcare centers |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/jp.2016.236 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005063 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1886643122 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2615531667 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1851691941 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1891861688 |
Volume | 37 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhR1daxQxMGgL4ov47WqtESqCsPay-djkSWppqUKLiIV7W5JsFrfI7tndQ_z3zuT2tnf1rC_7ktkhyXwlM5MZQvYsXjIcOt1zXqUiL3mqvZGp00FMnNcqxCSa0zN1ci4-T-V0cLh1Q1rlUidGRV22Hn3k-0xrBdaTZdmH2c8Uu0ZhdHVooXGbbGPpMkzpyqfjhYuJPHaQjWU4NRdqeJ834Xr_AmtVMvU-i7WZryzSdb28YpiuRUqjATq-T-4NJ0d6sCD1A3IrNA_JndMhNv6I1J_ig0faVrQJ6BMH4IDli1NMmO5pF2Zd3VGgCaaewlWbtg2Ffa1d3QJKOu8CRa9s3dD-V0sxV6C2l7_p9zFDjGImJxwXH5Pz46Nvhyfp0Egh9YqxPlWlUabMK-GzXLIc1LNzStjghPFOWWGccQEElYeJBxGWsqq8BKNV2tzZICR_QraatgnPCFVMBS219dYEoQXTlnEvjc9MlQtZTRLybrmZhR-qjGOzix9FjHZzXVzMCtz5AnY-IXsj8GxRXGMz2CukSrFY7yiSxYHQBg4sXOh_QihtwP4aIxPyNkKg2MJ8vB1eH8CqsADWGq7_QK7g3FmDBMH0a4g2Da_-vWSyYtAbXXHF5RuHM4wic6ZUnpDX4zAixlQ5YK45osDQJzOC3QRjmAZSapjk0wV_jwTINNYEUjwhb5YMvzK_v6nz_OZ1vCB3MzwJxWSnHbLVX87DSzjH9W43Cit89SHbJdsfj86-fP0Dax9GOA |
linkProvider | ProQuest |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemTgJeEN8UBjPSJiSksDp2HPsBoQGbWrZWCG3S3rLYdUQmlJQl1bR_ir-Ru3ytHWU87dmXk-27_O7sO98RshXjIcPgpXvIE0-EU-4pqwPPKCcGxirpqiSa8UQOj8XXk-Bkjfxu38JgWmWLiRVQT3OLd-Q7TCkJ1pP5_sfZLw-7RmF0tW2hUavFgbu8gCNb8WH0BeS77fv7e0efh17TVcCzkrHSk1Mt9TRMhPXDgIWAVcZIETsjtDUyFtpo40BruRtY0OcgSBIbAIJP49DETmCXCID8dcHhKNMj65_2Jt--d3ELEVY9a6vCn4oL2bwIHHC1c4bVMZl871fVoK9s4HVLsGAKr8VmK5O3_4Dcb3xVulsr10Oy5rJH5M64icY_JumoemJJ84RmDm_hgdhhwWQPU7RLWrhZkRYUtACTXeFwT_OMgiRTk-bAks4LR_EeOM1oeZFTzE5I4_NL-qPLSaOYOwoO6hNyfCub_JT0sjxzzwmVTDoVqNjG2gklmIoZt4G2vk5CESSDPnnXbmZkm7rm2F7jZ1TF17mKzmYR7nwEO98nWx3xrC7nsZpsE6US1evtQCDaFUqDi8SF-ieFVBosvtZBn7ytKBAoYD42bt47wKqw5NYSr_9QLvDcWKIEKLBLjFYNL37dKlnUIFURXf1XK4d9jFtzJmXYJ2-6YWSMyXmgXHNkgcFWpgW7iUYzBaJUMMlntX53AvAVViGSvE-2W4VfmN_f0nlx8zo2yd3h0fgwOhxNDl6Sez76YVWq1Qbpledz9wq8yNK8bn5dSk5vGy3-ADBRgx4 |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemIU28IL4pDGakTUhIoXX8EfsBoYlRrYxNPDCpbyF2HZEJJWVpNe1f46_jzk2ydpTxtOdcTrbv_Luz73xHyG6GhwyLl-4JzyORTHiknZGR1V4MrNPKhySa4xN1eCo-j-V4g_xu38JgWmWLiQGoJ5XDO_I-01qB9WRx3M-btIivB8MP018RdpDCSGvbTmOhIkf-8gKOb_X70QHIei-Oh5--fTyMmg4DkVOMzSI1McpMkly4OJEsAdyyVonMW2GcVZkw1lgPGsz9wIFuS5nnTgKaT7LEZl5gxwiA_zsJlwz3WDLuDntMJKF7bSgBqrlQzdvAAdf9M6yTydS7ONSFvrKG123CklG8FqUNxm94n9xrvFa6v1CzB2TDlw_J1nETl39EilF4bEmrnJYe7-OB2GPp5AiTtWe09tO6qCnoA6a9wjGfViUFmRa2qIAlndee4o1wUdLZRUUxT6HIzi_pjy47jWIWKbiqj8nprSzxE7JZVqV_RqhiymupM5cZL7RgOmPcSeNikydC5oMeedsuZuqaCufYaONnGiLtXKdn0xRXPoWV75Hdjni6KOyxnmwHpZIu5tvBQbovtAFniQv9TwqlDdh-Y2SPvAkUCBkwHpc1Lx9gVlh8a4XXfyiXeG6vUAIouBVG6z4v_90qWdpgVp1e7bC1n2OMYHOmVNIjr7vPyBjT9EC55sgCw67MCHYTjWEaRKlhkE8X-t0JINZYj0jxHtlrFX5pfH9L5_nN89ghW4AR6ZfRydELcjdGhyzkXG2Tzdn53L8Ed3JmX4V9S8n32waKP-E7he4 |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+neonatal+early-onset+sepsis+calculator+on+antibiotic+use+within+two+tertiary+healthcare+centers&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+perinatology&rft.au=Warren%2C+S&rft.au=Garcia%2C+M&rft.au=Hankins%2C+C&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fjp.2016.236&rft.externalDocID=A489151348 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon |