Impact of neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on antibiotic use within two tertiary healthcare centers

Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study D...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of perinatology Vol. 37; no. 4; pp. 394 - 397
Main Authors Warren, S, Garcia, M, Hankins, C
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.04.2017
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0743-8346
1476-5543
1476-5543
DOI10.1038/jp.2016.236

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines ( P <0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
AbstractList Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Results:Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Conclusion:Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants [greater-than or slanted equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.OBJECTIVEA recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.STUDY DESIGNRetrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.RESULTSOf 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.CONCLUSIONUse of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants [greater-than or slanted equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants [egs]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants [succeeds/equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P [less than] 0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed. Journal of Perinatology (2017) 37, 394-397; doi: 10.1038/jp.2016.236; published online 22 December 2016
Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS.Study Design:Retrospective review of infants [= or >, slanted]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations.Results:Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified.Conclusion:Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Study Design: Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Results: Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines ( P <0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Conclusion: Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants [succeeds/equal to]34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P [less than] 0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use remains sparse. The objective of this study was to determine the impact of applying the calculator to infants treated for EOS. Retrospective review of infants ⩾34 weeks gestational age who received antibiotics at birth. Subjects were compared according to Centers for Disease Control (CDC) 2010 guideline criteria versus the Kaiser Permanente neonatal EOS calculator recommendations. Of 205 patients, the EOS calculator recommended empiric antibiotics for 23% of those who received therapy, compared with 92% per CDC guidelines (P<0.001). No cases of culture-positive sepsis were identified. Use of the neonatal EOS calculator may dramatically reduce the number of infants who require antibiotics at birth, leading to reduced need for laboratory monitoring and improved antimicrobial stewardship. More safety data is needed.
Audience Academic
Author Warren, S
Garcia, M
Hankins, C
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: S
  surname: Warren
  fullname: Warren, S
  email: staci.warren@providence.org
  organization: Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
– sequence: 2
  givenname: M
  surname: Garcia
  fullname: Garcia, M
  organization: Providence Portland Medical Center
– sequence: 3
  givenname: C
  surname: Hankins
  fullname: Hankins, C
  organization: Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkt1rHCEUxYeS0mzSPvW9CIVSaGc7jh-jjyH0IxDoS_ssjnsn6-LqVB1C_vs4bEI3YVmCD4L-zrle7zmrTnzwUFXvcbPEDRHfNuOybTBftoS_qhaYdrxmjJKTatF0lNSCUH5anaW0aZr5sntTnbaiaVjDyaKyV9tRm4zCgDwEr7N2CHR0d3XwCTJKMCabkNHOTE7nEFHwSPtsexuyNWhKgG5tXluP8m1AGWK2Ot6hNWiX10ZHQAZ8OU5vq9eDdgnePezn1d8f3_9c_qqvf_-8ury4rg3HONd8JblcdQM1bcdwBz3ue0419FSanmsqe9lDJwmBxrSsY2wYDOuwWOmu10AZOa8-73zHGP5NkLLa2mTAOV0anJLCQmLBMRfiBSjDXGJJcUE_PkM3YYq-NKJajhkjmPPuGIWF4JwS3Lb_qRvtQFk_hBy1mUurCy5kK6iU7ChFSw8MEzq3sDxAlbWCrTUlKIMt509sXyTYr_BpT7CbawpuyrYk5KnzUXDf8cPDL039FlZqjHZbMqMeU1kAvANMDClFGJSxWc8-5a3WKdyoOflqM6o5-aokv2i-PNM82h6mv-7oVCh_A3FvUAfwe4PuDS4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_021_04282_x
crossref_primary_10_1055_a_2001_9012
crossref_primary_10_1093_jpids_piaa022
crossref_primary_10_1097_pq9_0000000000000235
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2019_317165
crossref_primary_10_3233_NPM_180075
crossref_primary_10_3390_antibiotics12030445
crossref_primary_10_1007_s40124_019_00190_9
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_020_00860_3
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2021_1951215
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_019_0577_5
crossref_primary_10_14238_pi58_6_2018_286_97
crossref_primary_10_1177_1093526619855467
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2020_1714582
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_arcped_2020_11_009
crossref_primary_10_3233_NPM_200531
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_025_02209_0
crossref_primary_10_1155_2022_8163396
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2017_11_045
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_semperi_2020_151324
crossref_primary_10_1542_hpeds_2018_0265
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamapediatrics_2019_2825
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41372_018_0207_7
crossref_primary_10_4103_1673_5374_235059
crossref_primary_10_1080_14767058_2019_1651281
crossref_primary_10_2174_0118744346336095240906105203
crossref_primary_10_1055_s_0041_1727279
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jgar_2020_03_015
crossref_primary_10_1097_JPN_0000000000000360
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12519_021_00446_9
crossref_primary_10_1542_peds_2019_0589
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2019_04_062
crossref_primary_10_1111_jpc_14572
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13052_021_01028_1
crossref_primary_10_1016_S1473_3099_20_30490_4
crossref_primary_10_1111_jpc_15384
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00431_018_3113_2
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jpeds_2021_04_007
crossref_primary_10_1097_pq9_0000000000000480
crossref_primary_10_1542_hpeds_2017_0180
crossref_primary_10_1542_neo_21_8_e505
crossref_primary_10_1136_archdischild_2018_316777
crossref_primary_10_3345_cep_2020_00094
Cites_doi 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246
10.1542/peds.2007-3423
10.1542/peds.2010-3464
10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1
10.1542/peds.2012-0541
10.1542/peds.112.3.543
10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007
10.1542/neo.16-5-e297
10.1542/peds.2015-2323
10.1542/peds.2013-1689
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017
COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2017
Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017.
Copyright_xml – notice: Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2017 Nature Publishing Group
– notice: Copyright Nature Publishing Group Apr 2017
– notice: Nature America, Inc., part of Springer Nature. 2017.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QG
7QL
7RV
7T5
7T7
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8AO
8C1
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AN0
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
H94
HCIFZ
K9.
KB0
LK8
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
NAPCQ
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
DOI 10.1038/jp.2016.236
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Nursing & Allied Health Database
Immunology Abstracts
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Pharma Collection
Public Health Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
British Nursing Database (Proquest)
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)
Biological Sciences
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
PML(ProQuest Medical Library)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest Central Essentials
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Central China
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
Health Research Premium Collection
Natural Science Collection
Health & Medical Research Collection
Biological Science Collection
Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
Nursing & Allied Health Premium
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source (Alumni)
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Pharma Collection
ProQuest Central
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
ProQuest Public Health
British Nursing Index with Full Text
ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Medical Library
Animal Behavior Abstracts
Immunology Abstracts
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList ProQuest Central Student

MEDLINE - Academic

AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts

ProQuest Central Student



MEDLINE

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1476-5543
EndPage 397
ExternalDocumentID 4321635549
A689284995
A489151348
28005063
10_1038_jp_2016_236
Genre Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Comparative Study
GeographicLocations United States
United States--US
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United States
– name: United States--US
GroupedDBID ---
-Q-
.GJ
.XZ
04C
0R~
29L
2FS
2WC
39C
3V.
4.4
406
53G
5GY
5RE
70F
7RV
7X7
88E
8AO
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8R4
8R5
AACDK
AANZL
AAQOH
AAQQT
AASML
AATNV
AAWTL
AAYZH
AAZLF
ABAKF
ABAWZ
ABDBF
ABJNI
ABLJU
ABPPZ
ABUWG
ABZZP
ACAOD
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACKTT
ACMJI
ACNCT
ACPRK
ACRQY
ACUHS
ACZOJ
ADBBV
ADFRT
ADHDB
AEFQL
AEJRE
AEMSY
AENEX
AEVLU
AEXYK
AFBBN
AFKRA
AFRAH
AFSHS
AGAYW
AGHAI
AGQEE
AHMBA
AHSBF
AIGIU
AILAN
AJRNO
ALFFA
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMYLF
AN0
AXYYD
BAWUL
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
BKEYQ
BKKNO
BMSDO
BNQBC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CAG
CCPQU
COF
CS3
DIK
DNIVK
DPUIP
DU5
E3Z
EBLON
EBS
EE.
EIHBH
EIOEI
EJD
EMOBN
ESX
EX3
F5P
FDQFY
FERAY
FIGPU
FIZPM
FSGXE
FYUFA
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HZ~
IAO
IHR
IHW
INH
INR
ITC
IWAJR
JSO
JZLTJ
KQ8
LGEZI
LOTEE
M1P
M7P
NADUK
NAO
NAPCQ
NQJWS
NXXTH
O9-
OK1
OVD
P2P
PCD
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
Q2X
RNS
RNT
RNTTT
ROL
SNX
SNYQT
SOHCF
SOJ
SRMVM
SV3
SWTZT
TAOOD
TBHMF
TDRGL
TEORI
TR2
TSG
TUS
UKHRP
WH7
WOW
ZCG
ZGI
AAYXX
ABBRH
ABDBE
ABFSG
ACMFV
ACSTC
AEZWR
AFDZB
AFHIU
AHWEU
AIXLP
ATHPR
AYFIA
CITATION
PHGZM
PHGZT
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
AEIIB
PMFND
7QG
7QL
7T5
7T7
7U9
7XB
8FD
8FE
8FH
8FK
ABRTQ
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
FR3
GNUQQ
H94
K9.
LK8
M7N
P64
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c611t-6d969d7f4c27517eb1bb64aeb49cb6a49b9be7933e0c25755ffc5718da7bae453
IEDL.DBID 7X7
ISSN 0743-8346
1476-5543
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 03:34:59 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 18:56:06 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 14:36:10 EDT 2025
Sat Aug 23 12:22:32 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 20:55:40 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:40:50 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:17:03 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:39:41 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:08:45 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:25:14 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:02:45 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:56:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:12 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 21 02:39:04 EST 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 4
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c611t-6d969d7f4c27517eb1bb64aeb49cb6a49b9be7933e0c25755ffc5718da7bae453
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
PMID 28005063
PQID 1886643122
PQPubID 30566
PageCount 4
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1891861688
proquest_miscellaneous_1851691941
proquest_journals_2615531667
proquest_journals_1886643122
gale_infotracmisc_A689284995
gale_infotracmisc_A489151348
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A689284995
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A489151348
gale_healthsolutions_A689284995
gale_healthsolutions_A489151348
pubmed_primary_28005063
crossref_citationtrail_10_1038_jp_2016_236
crossref_primary_10_1038_jp_2016_236
springer_journals_10_1038_jp_2016_236
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-04-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-04-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 04
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-04-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New York
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New York
– name: United States
PublicationTitle Journal of perinatology
PublicationTitleAbbrev J Perinatol
PublicationTitleAlternate J Perinatol
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher Nature Publishing Group US
Nature Publishing Group
Publisher_xml – name: Nature Publishing Group US
– name: Nature Publishing Group
References Shakib, Buchi, Smith, Young (CR9) 2015; 15
Cotton, Taylor, Stoll, Goldberg, Hansen, Sanchez (CR5) 2009; 123
Higgins, Saade, Polin, Grobman, Buhimschi, Watterberg (CR12) 2016; 127
Puopolo, Draper, Wi, Newman, Zupancic, Lieberman (CR6) 2011; 128
Polin (CR1) 2012; 129
CR8
Escobar, Puopolo, Wi, Turk, Kuzniewicz, Walsh (CR7) 2014; 133
Deleon, Shattuck, Jain (CR2) 2015; 16
Benjamin, Delong, Steinbach, Cotton, Walsh, Clark (CR4) 2003; 112
Kuzniewicz, Walsh, Li, Fischer, Escobar (CR10) 2016; 42
Verani, McGee, Schrag (CR3) 2010; 59
Wortham, Hansen, Schrag, Hale, Van Meurs, Sanchez (CR11) 2016; 137
CM Cotton (BFjp2016236_CR5) 2009; 123
RD Higgins (BFjp2016236_CR12) 2016; 127
J Shakib (BFjp2016236_CR9) 2015; 15
MW Kuzniewicz (BFjp2016236_CR10) 2016; 42
RA Polin (BFjp2016236_CR1) 2012; 129
KM Puopolo (BFjp2016236_CR6) 2011; 128
C Deleon (BFjp2016236_CR2) 2015; 16
JR Verani (BFjp2016236_CR3) 2010; 59
DK Benjamin (BFjp2016236_CR4) 2003; 112
BFjp2016236_CR8
GJ Escobar (BFjp2016236_CR7) 2014; 133
JM Wortham (BFjp2016236_CR11) 2016; 137
25906702 - Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3):340-4
19117861 - Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):58-66
22547779 - Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):1006-15
12949281 - Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):543-7
27066927 - Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 May;42(5):232-9
22025590 - Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1155-63
26719293 - Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):null
21088663 - MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36
24366992 - Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):30-6
26855098 - Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):426-36
References_xml – volume: 127
  start-page: 426
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  end-page: 436
  ident: CR12
  article-title: Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of chorioamnionitis: summary of a workshop
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246
– volume: 123
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  end-page: 66
  ident: CR5
  article-title: Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3423
– volume: 128
  start-page: e1155
  year: 2011
  end-page: e1162
  ident: CR6
  article-title: Estimating the probability of neonatal early-onset infection on the basis of maternal risk factors
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3464
– ident: CR8
– volume: 42
  start-page: 232
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  end-page: 239
  ident: CR10
  article-title: Development and implementation of an early-onset sepsis calculator to guide antibiotic management in late preterm and term neonates
  publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1
  issue: RR-10
  year: 2010
  end-page: 36
  ident: CR3
  article-title: Prevention of perinatal group b streptococcal disease: revised guidelines from CDC 2010
  publication-title: MMWR Recomm Rep
– volume: 129
  start-page: 1006
  year: 2012
  end-page: 1015
  ident: CR1
  article-title: The Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Management of neonates with suspected or proven early-onset bacterial sepsis
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0541
– volume: 112
  start-page: 543
  year: 2003
  end-page: 547
  ident: CR4
  article-title: Empirical therapy for neonatal candidemia in very low birth weight infants
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.543
– volume: 15
  start-page: 340
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  end-page: 344
  ident: CR9
  article-title: Management of newborns born to mothers with chorioamnionitis: is it time for a kinder, gentler approach?
  publication-title: Acad Pediatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007
– volume: 16
  start-page: e297
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  end-page: e308
  ident: CR2
  article-title: Biomarkers of neonatal sepsis
  publication-title: Neoreviews
  doi: 10.1542/neo.16-5-e297
– volume: 137
  start-page: e20152323
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: CR11
  article-title: Chorioamnionitis and culture-confirmed, early-onset neonatal infections
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2323
– volume: 133
  start-page: 30
  year: 2014
  end-page: 36
  ident: CR7
  article-title: Stratification of risk of early-onset sepsis in newborns ≥34 weeks’ gestation
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1689
– volume: 123
  start-page: 58
  issue: 1
  year: 2009
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR5
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3423
– volume: 128
  start-page: e1155
  year: 2011
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR6
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3464
– volume: 15
  start-page: 340
  issue: 3
  year: 2015
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR9
  publication-title: Acad Pediatr
  doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2014.11.007
– volume: 127
  start-page: 426
  issue: 3
  year: 2016
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR12
  publication-title: Obstet Gynecol
  doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001246
– volume: 129
  start-page: 1006
  year: 2012
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR1
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0541
– volume: 16
  start-page: e297
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR2
  publication-title: Neoreviews
  doi: 10.1542/neo.16-5-e297
– volume: 59
  start-page: 1
  issue: RR-10
  year: 2010
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR3
  publication-title: MMWR Recomm Rep
– volume: 112
  start-page: 543
  year: 2003
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR4
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.112.3.543
– volume: 42
  start-page: 232
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR10
  publication-title: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf
  doi: 10.1016/S1553-7250(16)42030-1
– ident: BFjp2016236_CR8
– volume: 133
  start-page: 30
  year: 2014
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR7
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1689
– volume: 137
  start-page: e20152323
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: BFjp2016236_CR11
  publication-title: Pediatrics
  doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2323
– reference: 27066927 - Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 May;42(5):232-9
– reference: 19117861 - Pediatrics. 2009 Jan;123(1):58-66
– reference: 22025590 - Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1155-63
– reference: 21088663 - MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010 Nov 19;59(RR-10):1-36
– reference: 26719293 - Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1):null
– reference: 25906702 - Acad Pediatr. 2015 May-Jun;15(3):340-4
– reference: 24366992 - Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):30-6
– reference: 26855098 - Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;127(3):426-36
– reference: 22547779 - Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):1006-15
– reference: 12949281 - Pediatrics. 2003 Sep;112(3 Pt 1):543-7
SSID ssj0014767
Score 2.3523624
Snippet Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from...
A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from its use...
Objective: A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from...
Objective:A recently described neonatal early-onset sepsis (EOS) calculator has the potential to reduce newborn antibiotic exposure but real world data from...
SourceID proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 394
SubjectTerms 692/699/255/1318
692/700/1720
Age
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antibiotics
Antiinfectives and antibacterials
Birth
Birth weight
Blood
Care and treatment
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Childbirth & labor
Diagnosis
Disease control
Diseases
Dosage and administration
Drug therapy
Electronic health records
Female
Gestational age
Health aspects
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Infants
Infants (Newborn)
Male
Mathematical analysis
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Membranes
Neonatal Sepsis - diagnosis
Neonatal Sepsis - drug therapy
Neonates
Neutrophils
Newborn babies
original-article
Pediatric Surgery
Pediatrics
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Sepsis
Tertiary Care Centers
Testing
United States
Title Impact of neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator on antibiotic use within two tertiary healthcare centers
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1038/jp.2016.236
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28005063
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1886643122
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2615531667
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1851691941
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1891861688
Volume 37
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhR1daxQxMGgL4ov47WqtESqCsPay-djkSWppqUKLiIV7W5JsFrfI7tndQ_z3zuT2tnf1rC_7ktkhyXwlM5MZQvYsXjIcOt1zXqUiL3mqvZGp00FMnNcqxCSa0zN1ci4-T-V0cLh1Q1rlUidGRV22Hn3k-0xrBdaTZdmH2c8Uu0ZhdHVooXGbbGPpMkzpyqfjhYuJPHaQjWU4NRdqeJ834Xr_AmtVMvU-i7WZryzSdb28YpiuRUqjATq-T-4NJ0d6sCD1A3IrNA_JndMhNv6I1J_ig0faVrQJ6BMH4IDli1NMmO5pF2Zd3VGgCaaewlWbtg2Ffa1d3QJKOu8CRa9s3dD-V0sxV6C2l7_p9zFDjGImJxwXH5Pz46Nvhyfp0Egh9YqxPlWlUabMK-GzXLIc1LNzStjghPFOWWGccQEElYeJBxGWsqq8BKNV2tzZICR_QraatgnPCFVMBS219dYEoQXTlnEvjc9MlQtZTRLybrmZhR-qjGOzix9FjHZzXVzMCtz5AnY-IXsj8GxRXGMz2CukSrFY7yiSxYHQBg4sXOh_QihtwP4aIxPyNkKg2MJ8vB1eH8CqsADWGq7_QK7g3FmDBMH0a4g2Da_-vWSyYtAbXXHF5RuHM4wic6ZUnpDX4zAixlQ5YK45osDQJzOC3QRjmAZSapjk0wV_jwTINNYEUjwhb5YMvzK_v6nz_OZ1vCB3MzwJxWSnHbLVX87DSzjH9W43Cit89SHbJdsfj86-fP0Dax9GOA
linkProvider ProQuest
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemTgJeEN8UBjPSJiSksDp2HPsBoQGbWrZWCG3S3rLYdUQmlJQl1bR_ir-Ru3ytHWU87dmXk-27_O7sO98RshXjIcPgpXvIE0-EU-4pqwPPKCcGxirpqiSa8UQOj8XXk-Bkjfxu38JgWmWLiRVQT3OLd-Q7TCkJ1pP5_sfZLw-7RmF0tW2hUavFgbu8gCNb8WH0BeS77fv7e0efh17TVcCzkrHSk1Mt9TRMhPXDgIWAVcZIETsjtDUyFtpo40BruRtY0OcgSBIbAIJP49DETmCXCID8dcHhKNMj65_2Jt--d3ELEVY9a6vCn4oL2bwIHHC1c4bVMZl871fVoK9s4HVLsGAKr8VmK5O3_4Dcb3xVulsr10Oy5rJH5M64icY_JumoemJJ84RmDm_hgdhhwWQPU7RLWrhZkRYUtACTXeFwT_OMgiRTk-bAks4LR_EeOM1oeZFTzE5I4_NL-qPLSaOYOwoO6hNyfCub_JT0sjxzzwmVTDoVqNjG2gklmIoZt4G2vk5CESSDPnnXbmZkm7rm2F7jZ1TF17mKzmYR7nwEO98nWx3xrC7nsZpsE6US1evtQCDaFUqDi8SF-ieFVBosvtZBn7ytKBAoYD42bt47wKqw5NYSr_9QLvDcWKIEKLBLjFYNL37dKlnUIFURXf1XK4d9jFtzJmXYJ2-6YWSMyXmgXHNkgcFWpgW7iUYzBaJUMMlntX53AvAVViGSvE-2W4VfmN_f0nlx8zo2yd3h0fgwOhxNDl6Sez76YVWq1Qbpledz9wq8yNK8bn5dSk5vGy3-ADBRgx4
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemIU28IL4pDGakTUhIoXX8EfsBoYlRrYxNPDCpbyF2HZEJJWVpNe1f46_jzk2ydpTxtOdcTrbv_Luz73xHyG6GhwyLl-4JzyORTHiknZGR1V4MrNPKhySa4xN1eCo-j-V4g_xu38JgWmWLiQGoJ5XDO_I-01qB9WRx3M-btIivB8MP018RdpDCSGvbTmOhIkf-8gKOb_X70QHIei-Oh5--fTyMmg4DkVOMzSI1McpMkly4OJEsAdyyVonMW2GcVZkw1lgPGsz9wIFuS5nnTgKaT7LEZl5gxwiA_zsJlwz3WDLuDntMJKF7bSgBqrlQzdvAAdf9M6yTydS7ONSFvrKG123CklG8FqUNxm94n9xrvFa6v1CzB2TDlw_J1nETl39EilF4bEmrnJYe7-OB2GPp5AiTtWe09tO6qCnoA6a9wjGfViUFmRa2qIAlndee4o1wUdLZRUUxT6HIzi_pjy47jWIWKbiqj8nprSzxE7JZVqV_RqhiymupM5cZL7RgOmPcSeNikydC5oMeedsuZuqaCufYaONnGiLtXKdn0xRXPoWV75Hdjni6KOyxnmwHpZIu5tvBQbovtAFniQv9TwqlDdh-Y2SPvAkUCBkwHpc1Lx9gVlh8a4XXfyiXeG6vUAIouBVG6z4v_90qWdpgVp1e7bC1n2OMYHOmVNIjr7vPyBjT9EC55sgCw67MCHYTjWEaRKlhkE8X-t0JINZYj0jxHtlrFX5pfH9L5_nN89ghW4AR6ZfRydELcjdGhyzkXG2Tzdn53L8Ed3JmX4V9S8n32waKP-E7he4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact+of+neonatal+early-onset+sepsis+calculator+on+antibiotic+use+within+two+tertiary+healthcare+centers&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+perinatology&rft.au=Warren%2C+S&rft.au=Garcia%2C+M&rft.au=Hankins%2C+C&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.pub=Nature+Publishing+Group&rft.issn=0743-8346&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038%2Fjp.2016.236&rft.externalDocID=A489151348
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0743-8346&client=summon