Multi-institutional external validation of urinary TWIST1 and NID2 methylation as a diagnostic test for bladder cancer

We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabil...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inUrologic oncology Vol. 33; no. 9; pp. 387.e1 - 387.e6
Main Authors Fantony, Joseph J., Abern, Michael R., Gopalakrishna, Ajay, Owusu, Richmond, Jack Tay, Kae, Lance, Raymond S., Inman, Brant A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Elsevier Inc 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study. TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule—if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule—if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis. A total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer. A urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers. •This external validation with additional data from an outside institution corroborates our previous finding of poor performance of this methylation assay compared to the developmental publication.•There appears to be improved test performance in patients with higher grade disease, showing evidence of spectrum effects.•This study shows that multi-institutional testing of a diagnostic test is needed before wide-spread clinical use, as it may show lack of reproducibility in a “real-world” situation.•TWIST/NID2 may be of some diagnostic benefit in the subgroup of active smokers. This needs further study with a larger cohort.
AbstractList We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study. TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule-if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule-if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis. A total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer. A urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers.
We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study. TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule—if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule—if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis. A total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer. A urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers. •This external validation with additional data from an outside institution corroborates our previous finding of poor performance of this methylation assay compared to the developmental publication.•There appears to be improved test performance in patients with higher grade disease, showing evidence of spectrum effects.•This study shows that multi-institutional testing of a diagnostic test is needed before wide-spread clinical use, as it may show lack of reproducibility in a “real-world” situation.•TWIST/NID2 may be of some diagnostic benefit in the subgroup of active smokers. This needs further study with a larger cohort.
Abstract Objectives We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study. Materials and methods TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule — if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule — if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis. Results A total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer. Conclusion A urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers.
We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study.OBJECTIVESWe previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation assay. In this expanded trial with subjects enrolled from another institution, we reexamine the diagnostic capabilities of the test to externally validate our previous study.TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule-if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule-if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis.MATERIALS AND METHODSTWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation was assessed in DNA isolated from the urine of subjects at risk of bladder cancer undergoing cystoscopy for hematuria or bladder cancer surveillance. The diagnostic gold standard was cystoscopy. Two thresholds of TWIST1 and NID2 gene methylation were used for determining test result positivity, those published by Renard et al. and Abern et al. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, diagnostic likelihood ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated for each gene, as well as their combination. In all, 3 methods were used to combine TWIST1 and NID2 into a single composite test: (1) believe-the-positive decision rule-if either gene is methylated the test result is positive, which maximizes test sensitivity; (2) believe-the-negative decision rule-if either gene is not methylated the test result is negative, which maximizes test specificity; and (3) a likelihood-based logistic regression model approach that balances sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility was determined using a decision curve analysis.A total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer.RESULTSA total of 209 subjects were evaluated: 40% for hematuria and 60% for bladder cancer surveillance. Approximately 75% were male, most of the prior cancers being low-grade Ta. Using cystoscopy as the gold standard, areas under the curve were 0.67 for TWIST1, 0.64 for NID2, and 0.66 for combined TWIST1 and NID2. Decision rule results revealed optimization of sensitivity at 67% using Renard thresholds and specificity using the Abern thresholds at 69%. We found improved sensitivity (78%) in current smokers. Decision curve analyses revealed that the methylation assay provided only a modest benefit even at high probabilities of missed cancer.A urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers.CONCLUSIONA urine DNA test measuring TWIST1 and NID2 methylation was externally examined with a larger cohort and its results continue to be poor. These 2 biomarkers are unlikely to replace cystoscopy, but they may be worthy of study in active smokers.
Author Jack Tay, Kae
Lance, Raymond S.
Fantony, Joseph J.
Inman, Brant A.
Owusu, Richmond
Abern, Michael R.
Gopalakrishna, Ajay
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Joseph J.
  surname: Fantony
  fullname: Fantony, Joseph J.
  organization: Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Michael R.
  surname: Abern
  fullname: Abern, Michael R.
  organization: Department of Urology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ajay
  surname: Gopalakrishna
  fullname: Gopalakrishna, Ajay
  organization: Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Richmond
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8267-4663
  surname: Owusu
  fullname: Owusu, Richmond
  organization: Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Kae
  surname: Jack Tay
  fullname: Jack Tay, Kae
  organization: Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Raymond S.
  surname: Lance
  fullname: Lance, Raymond S.
  organization: Division of Urology, Urology of Virginia, Virginia Beach, VA
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Brant A.
  surname: Inman
  fullname: Inman, Brant A.
  email: brant.inman@duke.edu
  organization: Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26027762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNUstuFDEQtFAQecAngHzkMoPteXhGCCIUElgpwCGLOFpeuw1evHawPSv27_Gwm0skFE5uWVXV3VV9io588IDQc0pqSmj_al1PMbjgVc0I7WrS1oS2j9AJHXhTsXbsj0pN-FDRthmP0WlKa1IQA6VP0DHrCeO8Zydo-2ly2VbWp2zzlG3w0mH4nSHOxVY6q-X8i4PBU7Rexh1eflvcLCmWXuPPi_cMbyD_2Lk9TCYssbbyuw9FUeEMKWMTIl45qTVErKRXEJ-ix0a6BM8O7xn6enW5vPhYXX_5sLh4d12pnpJcZmdSGW0McKakAS1BNRoMtD3pOj0o3jZmpYBpNkoqSTeOw2AYjGOrOOWmOUMv97q3MfyayixiY5MC56SHMCVBORloz5quKdAXB-i02oAWt9FuyrbizqsCeL0HqBhSimCEsvnv1jlK6wQlYk5GrMUhGTEnI0griu-F3d1j3zV4iHe-50GxaWshiqQsFA-1jaCy0ME-qPD2noJy1lsl3U_YQVqHac66eCESE0TczFczHw3tysGMzezMm38L_McAfwBZQ9dm
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms18040735
crossref_primary_10_2217_epi_2017_0156
crossref_primary_10_18632_oncotarget_24768
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11934_018_0861_5
crossref_primary_10_1097_MOU_0000000000000605
crossref_primary_10_1177_0004563217691064
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_018_0496_x
crossref_primary_10_3389_fbioe_2024_1458362
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_2020_61_S1_S8
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2020_01_007
crossref_primary_10_3390_genes7120125
crossref_primary_10_2217_epi_2016_0064
crossref_primary_10_3389_fonc_2022_986692
crossref_primary_10_3390_ijms20112657
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12894_020_00670_x
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10654_024_01110_y
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_2016_57_S1_S77
crossref_primary_10_1038_bjc_2017_318
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13148_016_0303_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s00345_024_05287_5
crossref_primary_10_4111_icu_20210194
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ucl_2015_08_005
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.12.006
10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00657.x
10.4161/epi.25927
10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03211.x
10.1089/dna.2013.2030
10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
10.2307/2531772
10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00011
10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.064
10.3390/ijms16022472
10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.041
10.2307/2531595
10.1177/0272989X06295361
10.3390/ijms151223897
10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.08.003
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07224.x
10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.008
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2015 Elsevier Inc.
Elsevier Inc.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright_xml – notice: 2015 Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Elsevier Inc.
– notice: Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
DOI 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE



MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1873-2496
EndPage 387.e6
ExternalDocumentID 26027762
10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
S1078143915001933
1_s2_0_S1078143915001933
Genre Validation Studies
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
--K
--M
-RU
.1-
.FO
.~1
0R~
123
1B1
1P~
1~.
1~5
29Q
4.4
457
4CK
4G.
53G
5RE
5VS
6PF
7-5
71M
8P~
AAEDT
AAEDW
AAIKJ
AAKOC
AALRI
AAOAW
AAQFI
AAQQT
AAQXK
AATTM
AAWTL
AAXKI
AAXUO
AAYWO
ABBQC
ABMAC
ABMZM
ABWVN
ABXDB
ACDAQ
ACGFS
ACIEU
ACIUM
ACRLP
ACRPL
ADBBV
ADEZE
ADMUD
ADNMO
AEBSH
AEIPS
AEKER
AEVXI
AFJKZ
AFRHN
AFTJW
AFXIZ
AGCQF
AGHFR
AGQPQ
AGUBO
AGYEJ
AIEXJ
AIIUN
AIKHN
AITUG
AJRQY
AJUYK
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMRAJ
ANKPU
ANZVX
ASPBG
AVWKF
AXJTR
AZFZN
BKOJK
BLXMC
BNPGV
CS3
EBS
EFJIC
EFKBS
EJD
EO8
EO9
EP2
EP3
F5P
FDB
FEDTE
FGOYB
FIRID
FNPLU
FYGXN
G-Q
GBLVA
HVGLF
HZ~
IHE
J1W
KOM
M41
MO0
N9A
O-L
O9-
OAUVE
OK.
OW.
OZT
P-8
P-9
P2P
PC.
Q38
R2-
ROL
RPZ
SDF
SDG
SEL
SES
SEW
SSH
SSZ
T5K
UDS
UHS
Z5R
ZGI
~G-
AACTN
AFKWA
AJOXV
AMFUW
RIG
AAIAV
ABLVK
ABYKQ
AJBFU
EFLBG
LCYCR
AAYXX
AGRNS
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c610t-142acfdffe72cafedaec3defe46055d8c743fbce2d29a1a059988f2e994c717f3
IEDL.DBID .~1
ISSN 1078-1439
1873-2496
IngestDate Fri Jul 11 10:59:38 EDT 2025
Mon Jul 21 06:02:54 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:03:10 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:59:22 EDT 2025
Fri Feb 23 02:13:24 EST 2024
Sun Feb 23 10:19:27 EST 2025
Tue Aug 26 16:31:59 EDT 2025
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 9
Keywords Diagnostic test
Sensitivity
Specificity
Epigenetic
Urothelial carcinoma
Smoking
Language English
License Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c610t-142acfdffe72cafedaec3defe46055d8c743fbce2d29a1a059988f2e994c717f3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
ORCID 0000-0001-8267-4663
PMID 26027762
PQID 1708162353
PQPubID 23479
ParticipantIDs proquest_miscellaneous_1708162353
pubmed_primary_26027762
crossref_citationtrail_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
elsevier_sciencedirect_doi_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
elsevier_clinicalkeyesjournals_1_s2_0_S1078143915001933
elsevier_clinicalkey_doi_10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2015-09-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2015-09-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 09
  year: 2015
  text: 2015-09-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace United States
PublicationPlace_xml – name: United States
PublicationTitle Urologic oncology
PublicationTitleAlternate Urol Oncol
PublicationYear 2015
Publisher Elsevier Inc
Publisher_xml – name: Elsevier Inc
References Osborne (bib11) 2010; 15
Fridrichova, Smolkova, Kajabova, Zmetakova, Krivulcik, Mego (bib6) 2015; 165
Renard, Joniau, van Cleynenbreugel, Collette, Naome, Vlassenbroeck (bib8) 2010; 58
DeLong, DeLong, Clarke-Pearson (bib12) 1988; 44
Fawcett (bib13) 2006; 27
R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.
Lokeshwar, Habuchi, Grossman, Murphy, Hautmann, Hemstreet (bib4) 2005; 66
Vickers, Elkin (bib17) 2006; 26
McIntosh, Pepe (bib15) 2002; 58
Mulherin, Miller (bib22) 2002; 137
Marshall (bib14) 1989; 45
Yafi, Brimo, Steinberg, Aprikian, Tanguay, Kassouf (bib5) 2015; 33
Abern, Owusu, Inman (bib9) 2014; 32
Miremami, Kyprianou (bib1) 2014; 15
Ng, Yu (bib7) 2015; 16
Robin, Turck, Hainard, Tiberti, Lisacek, Sanchez (bib18) 2011; 12
Besaratinia, Cockburn, Tommasi (bib20) 2013; 8
van der Aa, Steyerberg, Sen, Zwarthoff, Kirkels, van der Kwast (bib3) 2008; 101
Yegin, Gunes, Buyukalpelli (bib21) 2013; 32
Shariat, Karam, Lotan, Karakiewizc (bib2) 2008; 10
Li, Lin, Fan, Duan, Huang (bib10) 2013; 20
Pepe (bib16) 2003
Marshall (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib14) 1989; 45
McIntosh (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib15) 2002; 58
DeLong (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib12) 1988; 44
van der Aa (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib3) 2008; 101
Pepe (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib16) 2003
Vickers (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib17) 2006; 26
Abern (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib9) 2014; 32
Fridrichova (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib6) 2015; 165
Robin (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib18) 2011; 12
10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib19
Renard (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib8) 2010; 58
Miremami (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib1) 2014; 15
Lokeshwar (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib4) 2005; 66
Mulherin (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib22) 2002; 137
Fawcett (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib13) 2006; 27
Yegin (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib21) 2013; 32
Shariat (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib2) 2008; 10
Ng (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib7) 2015; 16
Li (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib10) 2013; 20
Yafi (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib5) 2015; 33
Osborne (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib11) 2010; 15
Besaratinia (10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib20) 2013; 8
References_xml – volume: 66
  start-page: 35
  year: 2005
  end-page: 63
  ident: bib4
  article-title: Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers
  publication-title: Urology
– volume: 58
  start-page: 96
  year: 2010
  end-page: 104
  ident: bib8
  article-title: Identification and validation of the methylated TWIST1 and NID2 genes through real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assays for the noninvasive detection of primary bladder cancer in urine samples
  publication-title: Eur Urol
– volume: 27
  start-page: 861
  year: 2006
  end-page: 874
  ident: bib13
  article-title: An introduction to ROC analysis
  publication-title: Pattern Recogn Lett
– volume: 26
  start-page: 565
  year: 2006
  end-page: 574
  ident: bib17
  article-title: Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models
  publication-title: Med Decis Making
– volume: 32
  start-page: 386
  year: 2013
  end-page: 392
  ident: bib21
  article-title: Hypermethylation of TWIST1 and NID2 in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients
  publication-title: DNA Cell Biol
– volume: 10
  start-page: 120
  year: 2008
  end-page: 135
  ident: bib2
  article-title: Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring
  publication-title: Rev Urol
– volume: 20
  start-page: 602
  year: 2013
  end-page: 609
  ident: bib10
  article-title: Diagnosis of narrow-band imaging in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Int J Urol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  end-page: 9
  ident: bib11
  article-title: Improving your data transformations: applying the Box-Cox transformation
  publication-title: Pract Asses Res Eval
– year: 2003
  ident: bib16
  publication-title: The statistical evaluation of medical tests for classification and prediction
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1213
  year: 1989
  end-page: 1222
  ident: bib14
  article-title: The predictive value of simple rules for combining two diagnostic tests
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 16
  start-page: 2472
  year: 2015
  end-page: 2496
  ident: bib7
  article-title: Promoter hypermethylation of tumour suppressor genes as potential biomarkers in colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
– volume: 15
  start-page: 23897
  year: 2014
  end-page: 23908
  ident: bib1
  article-title: The promise of novel molecular markers in bladder cancer
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
– volume: 44
  start-page: 837
  year: 1988
  end-page: 845
  ident: bib12
  article-title: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 58
  start-page: 657
  year: 2002
  end-page: 664
  ident: bib15
  article-title: Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score
  publication-title: Biometrics
– volume: 32
  start-page: 51
  year: 2014
  ident: bib9
  article-title: Clinical performance and utility of a DNA methylation urine test for bladder cancer
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1106
  year: 2008
  end-page: 1110
  ident: bib3
  article-title: Patients׳ perceived burden of cystoscopic and urinary surveillance of bladder cancer: a randomized comparison
  publication-title: BJU Int
– volume: 33
  start-page: 66
  year: 2015
  ident: bib5
  article-title: Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
– reference: R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna.
– volume: 165
  start-page: 717
  year: 2015
  end-page: 730
  ident: bib6
  article-title: CXCL12 and ADAM23 hypermethylation are associated with advanced breast cancers
  publication-title: Transl Res
– volume: 12
  start-page: 77
  year: 2011
  ident: bib18
  article-title: pROC: an open-source package for R and S+to analyze and compare ROC curves
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1013
  year: 2013
  end-page: 1022
  ident: bib20
  article-title: Alterations of DNA methylome in human bladder cancer
  publication-title: Epigenetics
– volume: 137
  start-page: 598
  year: 2002
  end-page: 602
  ident: bib22
  article-title: Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
– ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib19
– volume: 165
  start-page: 717
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib6
  article-title: CXCL12 and ADAM23 hypermethylation are associated with advanced breast cancers
  publication-title: Transl Res
  doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2014.12.006
– volume: 58
  start-page: 657
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib15
  article-title: Combining several screening tests: optimality of the risk score
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2002.00657.x
– volume: 8
  start-page: 1013
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib20
  article-title: Alterations of DNA methylome in human bladder cancer
  publication-title: Epigenetics
  doi: 10.4161/epi.25927
– volume: 20
  start-page: 602
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib10
  article-title: Diagnosis of narrow-band imaging in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  publication-title: Int J Urol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03211.x
– year: 2003
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib16
– volume: 32
  start-page: 386
  year: 2013
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib21
  article-title: Hypermethylation of TWIST1 and NID2 in tumor tissues and voided urine in urinary bladder cancer patients
  publication-title: DNA Cell Biol
  doi: 10.1089/dna.2013.2030
– volume: 12
  start-page: 77
  year: 2011
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib18
  article-title: pROC: an open-source package for R and S+to analyze and compare ROC curves
  publication-title: BMC Bioinformatics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77
– volume: 45
  start-page: 1213
  year: 1989
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib14
  article-title: The predictive value of simple rules for combining two diagnostic tests
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2531772
– volume: 137
  start-page: 598
  year: 2002
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib22
  article-title: Spectrum bias or spectrum effect? Subgroup variation in diagnostic test evaluation
  publication-title: Ann Intern Med
  doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-7-200210010-00011
– volume: 66
  start-page: 35
  issue: 6 Suppl. 1
  year: 2005
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib4
  article-title: Bladder tumor markers beyond cytology: International Consensus Panel on bladder tumor markers
  publication-title: Urology
  doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.064
– volume: 16
  start-page: 2472
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib7
  article-title: Promoter hypermethylation of tumour suppressor genes as potential biomarkers in colorectal cancer
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms16022472
– volume: 27
  start-page: 861
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib13
  article-title: An introduction to ROC analysis
  publication-title: Pattern Recogn Lett
  doi: 10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
– volume: 58
  start-page: 96
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib8
  article-title: Identification and validation of the methylated TWIST1 and NID2 genes through real-time methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction assays for the noninvasive detection of primary bladder cancer in urine samples
  publication-title: Eur Urol
  doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.041
– volume: 44
  start-page: 837
  year: 1988
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib12
  article-title: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2531595
– volume: 10
  start-page: 120
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib2
  article-title: Critical evaluation of urinary markers for bladder cancer detection and monitoring
  publication-title: Rev Urol
– volume: 15
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib11
  article-title: Improving your data transformations: applying the Box-Cox transformation
  publication-title: Pract Asses Res Eval
– volume: 26
  start-page: 565
  year: 2006
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib17
  article-title: Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models
  publication-title: Med Decis Making
  doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361
– volume: 15
  start-page: 23897
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib1
  article-title: The promise of novel molecular markers in bladder cancer
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms151223897
– volume: 32
  start-page: 51
  year: 2014
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib9
  article-title: Clinical performance and utility of a DNA methylation urine test for bladder cancer
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.08.003
– volume: 101
  start-page: 1106
  year: 2008
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib3
  article-title: Patients׳ perceived burden of cystoscopic and urinary surveillance of bladder cancer: a randomized comparison
  publication-title: BJU Int
  doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07224.x
– volume: 33
  start-page: 66
  year: 2015
  ident: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014_bib5
  article-title: Prospective analysis of sensitivity and specificity of urinary cytology and other urinary biomarkers for bladder cancer
  publication-title: Urol Oncol
  doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.008
SSID ssj0014811
Score 2.2367845
Snippet We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental study of the TWIST1...
Abstract Objectives We previously reported a clinical trial in which we were unable to replicate the excellent diagnostic metrics produced in the developmental...
SourceID proquest
pubmed
crossref
elsevier
SourceType Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 387.e1
SubjectTerms Aged
Area Under Curve
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - genetics
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine
Cell Adhesion Molecules - genetics
Cell Adhesion Molecules - metabolism
Cell Adhesion Molecules - urine
Cohort Studies
Diagnostic test
DNA Methylation
Epigenetic
Female
Humans
Likelihood Functions
Male
Middle Aged
Nuclear Proteins - genetics
Nuclear Proteins - metabolism
Nuclear Proteins - urine
Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
ROC Curve
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Smoking
Specificity
Twist-Related Protein 1 - genetics
Twist-Related Protein 1 - metabolism
Twist-Related Protein 1 - urine
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - diagnosis
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - genetics
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine
Urology
Urothelial carcinoma
Title Multi-institutional external validation of urinary TWIST1 and NID2 methylation as a diagnostic test for bladder cancer
URI https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/1-s2.0-S1078143915001933
https://www.clinicalkey.es/playcontent/1-s2.0-S1078143915001933
https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2015.04.014
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26027762
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1708162353
Volume 33
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV1LSwMxEA5SQbyIb-uLCF637Wazr2OpSqvYiy32FrLZBCplW7at0Iu_3ZndbEVUFI_7mM2SmUy-JDPfEHLtaRkmMtGOATju8EhxJw5M7LgmlKZllK84Jgo_9oPukN-P_NEG6VS5MBhWaX1_6dMLb23vNG1vNmfjcfPJRZ4aTBz1Ead4yPjJeYhW3nhbh3kA2i9q8OLLDr79kcXTfGksc_AwGTIZun7BeOryn-ann_BnMQ_d7ZIdCyBpu_zHPbKhs32y9WiPyA_Ia5FS64xtEECx00crrmcKdjUuqyjRqaG40y7zFR08954GLpVZSvu9G0axrPSqDJKjck4lTcuAPGiSAjRdUEC6NJmg08qpQrvJD8nw7nbQ6Tq2uIKjADEtoC-YVCY1RodMSaNTqZWXaqPxoNRPIwXQwiRKs5TF0pVI4xJFhuk45gqWgMY7IrVsmukTTPv2VMpY4sEjHjMV89iTESzZAyQ_U7JOeNWlQlnmcSyAMRFViNmLsJoQqAnR4gI0USeNtdispN74TSCo9CWqvFLwhAImh98Ew-8E9dyO57lwxZyJlvhic3USrSU_me1fGr2qTErAkMZzGpnp6RIaC7EaCvN8-PxxaWvrDoDlJwthAjv9f8NnZBuvykC5c1Jb5Et9AchqkVwWQ-eSbLZ7D93-Oy9BJa0
linkProvider Elsevier
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3fT9swED5BkcZeEOwHK4zhSXsNbWynSR6rDtQC7QtF481yHFsqQilKWyT-e-4SpwhtCLTXOBdH5_P5s333HcAvYXWc6cwGDuF4IBMjg7Tn0iB0sXZdZyIjKVF4POkNr-X5TXSzAYMmF4bCKr3vr3165a39k47XZud-NutchcRTQ4mjEeEUITZhi9ipohZs9UcXw8n6MkEmVRleej8ggedEns7tyapEJ1MQmWEYVaSnoXxtiXoNglZL0dku7HgMyfr1b-7Bhi0-wYexvyX_DA9VVm0w83EA1WEfa-ieGZrWrC6kxOaO0WG7Lh_Z9M_oahoyXeRsMvrNGVWWfqzj5JheMM3yOiYPu2SITpcMwS7L7shvlcyQ6ZRf4PrsdDoYBr6-QmAQNC1RF1wblztnY260s7m2RuTWWborjfLEILpwmbE856kONTG5JInjNk2lwV2gE1-hVcwL-40yv4XJOc8ENsmUm1SmQie4a-8R_5nRbZCNSpXx5ONUA-NONVFmt8qPhKKRUF2pcCTacLIWu6_ZN94S6DXjpZrUUnSGCteHtwTjfwnahZ_SCxWqBVdd9ZfZtSFZS76w3Pd0-rMxKYWzmq5qdGHnK-wspoIoXET4-f3a1tYKwB0oj3ENO_j_jo9hezgdX6rL0eTiED5SSx039x1ay3JljxBoLbMffiI9ASRFKF4
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-institutional+external+validation+of+urinary+TWIST1+and+NID2+methylation+as+a+diagnostic+test+for+bladder+cancer&rft.jtitle=Urologic+oncology&rft.au=Fantony%2C+Joseph+J.&rft.au=Abern%2C+Michael+R.&rft.au=Gopalakrishna%2C+Ajay&rft.au=Owusu%2C+Richmond&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.issn=1078-1439&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=387.e6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016%2Fj.urolonc.2015.04.014&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=10_1016_j_urolonc_2015_04_014
thumbnail_m http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/image/custom?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.clinicalkey.com%2Fck-thumbnails%2F10781439%2FS1078143915X00081%2Fcov150h.gif