The transversus abdominis plane block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine use after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia: a randomized controlled trial
Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe...
Saved in:
| Published in | BMC anesthesiology Vol. 23; no. 1; pp. 100 - 7 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors | , , , , , , , , |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
London
BioMed Central
30.03.2023
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
| ISSN | 1471-2253 1471-2253 |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-023-02061-9 |
Cover
Loading…
| Abstract | Background
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia.
Methods
Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.
Results
119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2),
P < 0.001
; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),
P < 0.001
; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),
P = 0.001
] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%),
P < 0.05
]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.
Conclusions
In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Trial registration
Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(
http://www.chictr.org.cn
) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. |
|---|---|
| AbstractList | The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia.
Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.
119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.
In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.
Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Results 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Conclusions In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Trial registration Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( Keywords: Severe pre-eclampsia, Cesarean section, Intrathecal morphine, Transversus abdominis plane, Postoperative analgesia Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Results 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001 ; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2), P < 0.001 ; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2), P = 0.001 ] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05 ]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Conclusions In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Trial registration Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia.BACKGROUNDThe transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia.Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.METHODSPregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.RESULTS119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.CONCLUSIONSIn conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293.TRIAL REGISTRATIONRegistered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. BackgroundThe transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia.MethodsPregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.Results119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns.ConclusionsIn conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion.Trial registrationRegistered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry(http://www.chictr.org.cn) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. Abstract Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to intrathecal morphine alone. However, the analgesia efficacy of their conjunction has not been demonstrated in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. The study aimed to compare the postcesarean analgesia of TAP block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine versus intrathecal morphine alone in women with severe pre-eclampsia. Methods Pregnant women with severe pre-eclampsia undergoing planned cesarean section were randomly allocated into 2 groups to receive TAP block with 20 ml of 0.35% Ropivacaine (TAP group) or with the same volume of 0.9% saline (Sham group) after undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia with 15 mg of 0.5% Ropivacaine plus 0.1 mg of morphine. The outcomes for this analysis include the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score at rest and with movement at 4,8,12,24 h after TAP block was performed, times of use of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) within 12 h after anesthesia, the occurrence of maternal side effects, maternal satisfaction, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Results 119 subjects receive TAP block with 0.35% Ropivacaine (n = 59)or 0.9% saline (n = 60). At 4,8, 12 h after TAP block, the TAP group reported lower VAS score at rest [at 4 h: 1(0,1) vs. 1(1,2), P < 0.001; at 8 h:1(1,1) vs. 1(1.5,2),P < 0.001; at 12 h:1(1,2) vs. 2(1,2),P = 0.001] and higher satisfaction [53(89.9%) vs.45(75.0%), P < 0.05]. There were no differences between groups in VAS score at 24 h at rest and at all time points above with movement, times of use of PCA within 12 h after anesthesia, maternal side-effect, and Apgar score at 1 and 5 min of newborns. Conclusions In conclusion, The TAP block performed in conjunction with intrathecal morphine may not reduce opioid consumption, but it could reduce VAS scores at rest in the first 12 h after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia, and improve maternal satisfaction, which is worthy of clinical promotion. Trial registration Registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry( http://www.chictr.org.cn ) on 13/12/2021: ChiCTR2100054293. |
| ArticleNumber | 100 |
| Audience | Academic |
| Author | Zhang, Long-xin Liu, Ming Zhou, Min Zhang, Su-jing Zhang, Li Lu, Huan Chen, Li-juan Lin, Li-hua Yan, Zhi-rong |
| Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Zhi-rong surname: Yan fullname: Yan, Zhi-rong organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 2 givenname: Li-juan surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Li-juan organization: Department of Child healthcare center, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 3 givenname: Su-jing surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Su-jing organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 4 givenname: Long-xin surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Long-xin organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 5 givenname: Huan surname: Lu fullname: Lu, Huan organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 6 givenname: Li surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Li organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 7 givenname: Ming surname: Liu fullname: Liu, Ming organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 8 givenname: Min surname: Zhou fullname: Zhou, Min email: zm405@163.com organization: Department of Anesthesiology, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University – sequence: 9 givenname: Li-hua surname: Lin fullname: Lin, Li-hua email: llh901018@126.com organization: Department of Healthcare, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics & Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Key Laboratory of Women and Children’s Critical Diseases Research, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Fujian Medical University |
| BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997853$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
| BookMark | eNp9Ustu1DAUjVARfcAPsECW2LCZ4kcS22xQVfGoVIlNWVuOczPjIbEHO2kFv8RPctOZ0k6FqsiKdX3Oua9zXByEGKAoXjN6ypiq32fGlWQLygUeWrOFflYcsRJDnFfi4MH9sDjOeU0pk4qKF8WhqLWWqhJHxZ-rFZAx2ZCvIeUpE9u0cfDBZ7LpbQDS9NH9ID4QF8N6Cm70MZAbP64whrxxBc72ZIhps_IInzIQ242QiINsE9hAMmxJqHETB9ixM2BCIJsEC3C9HTbZ2w_EEixlLuA3tHPGMcW-x-uYvO1fFs8722d4tfufFN8_f7o6_7q4_Pbl4vzscuFqqsZFV0mtaMOqtuuYaqktqaO0q1VrmWtoWVrhdMsaIQFsx7mkrdKVrG3DK-a6SpwUF1vdNtq12SQ_2PTLROvNbSCmpbFp9K4HU2opW1uqimuNaTrluOa1BU0bJ8qaodbHrdZmagZoHcxD6_dE91-CX5llvDaM4kalmBXe7RRS_DlBHs3gs4N-3k6csuFSC61qyefC3z6CruOUAs7KcEWxRF1X_B61tNiBD13ExG4WNWeyFFIIqimiTv-Dwq-FweNmoPMY3yO8edjpvxbvvIYAtQW4FHNO0BnnRztbA5V9jx2b2dZma2uDtja3tjYaqfwR9U79SZLYkjKCwxLS_TSeYP0FtPcMhA |
| CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jopan_2024_03_027 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jfma_2025_02_021 crossref_primary_10_2147_JPR_S428332 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0308335 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11916_024_01292_w crossref_primary_10_1016_j_peptides_2024_171268 |
| Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.01.003 10.2147/JPR.S144066 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834f015f 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.05.008 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6 10.1093/bja/aep235 10.1007/s40264-015-0386-5 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.3.193 10.4103/0019-5049.179451 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.06.003 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000066 10.1136/rapm-2019-100483 10.3390/ijms161023905 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4c922 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004 10.1007/BF03013154 10.36076/ppj.2010/13/337 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.12.002 |
| ContentType | Journal Article |
| Copyright | The Author(s) 2023 2023. The Author(s). COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2023 – notice: 2023. The Author(s). – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
| DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7TK 7X7 7XB 88E 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA AZQEC BENPR CCPQU DWQXO FYUFA GHDGH K9. M0S M1P PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM DOA |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12871-023-02061-9 |
| DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Neurosciences Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Hospital Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) |
| DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Neurosciences Abstracts ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
| DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic Publicly Available Content Database |
| Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
| DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| Discipline | Medicine |
| EISSN | 1471-2253 |
| EndPage | 7 |
| ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_4977da48529940cf8c2926ae90bc3461 PMC10061731 A743733090 36997853 10_1186_s12871_023_02061_9 |
| Genre | Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
| GeographicLocations | China |
| GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China |
| GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5GY 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK E3Z EBD EBLON EBS ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB ~8M AAYXX ALIPV CITATION -A0 3V. ACRMQ ADINQ C24 CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 7TK 7XB 8FK AZQEC DWQXO K9. PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 5PM |
| ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-f57980b15dff18d0a40c00f68da1cb044a3c9d1b37eeaf2270d89576ab251cf53 |
| IEDL.DBID | M48 |
| ISSN | 1471-2253 |
| IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 01:26:40 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:39:01 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:54:57 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 05:39:05 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:35:42 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:51:39 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:53:46 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 03:35:49 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 22:58:57 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:28:47 EDT 2025 |
| IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
| IsOpenAccess | true |
| IsPeerReviewed | true |
| IsScholarly | true |
| Issue | 1 |
| Keywords | Severe pre-eclampsia Transversus abdominis plane Postoperative analgesia Cesarean section Intrathecal morphine |
| Language | English |
| License | 2023. The Author(s). Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
| LinkModel | DirectLink |
| MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c608t-f57980b15dff18d0a40c00f68da1cb044a3c9d1b37eeaf2270d89576ab251cf53 |
| Notes | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 content type line 14 ObjectType-Feature-3 ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1 ObjectType-Undefined-1 content type line 23 |
| OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12871-023-02061-9 |
| PMID | 36997853 |
| PQID | 2802999652 |
| PQPubID | 44060 |
| PageCount | 7 |
| ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4977da48529940cf8c2926ae90bc3461 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10061731 proquest_miscellaneous_2793986725 proquest_journals_2802999652 gale_infotracmisc_A743733090 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A743733090 pubmed_primary_36997853 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12871_023_02061_9 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12871_023_02061_9 springer_journals_10_1186_s12871_023_02061_9 |
| ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
| PublicationCentury | 2000 |
| PublicationDate | 2023-03-30 |
| PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2023-03-30 |
| PublicationDate_xml | – month: 03 year: 2023 text: 2023-03-30 day: 30 |
| PublicationDecade | 2020 |
| PublicationPlace | London |
| PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
| PublicationTitle | BMC anesthesiology |
| PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Anesthesiol |
| PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Anesthesiol |
| PublicationYear | 2023 |
| Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
| Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
| References | E Steegers (2061_CR2) 2010; 376 M Cardoso (2061_CR7) 1998; 86 X Ruan (2061_CR13) 2010; 13 G Maitreyi (2061_CR11) 2016; 60 M Siddiqui (2061_CR17) 2011; 23 2061_CR5 2061_CR10 2061_CR21 2061_CR20 G Maria (2061_CR3) 2015; 16 JF Costello (2061_CR14) 2009; 34 L Magee (2061_CR1) 2014; 4 D Belavy (2061_CR18) 2009; 103 JG Mcdonnell (2061_CR16) 2008; 106 KS Ladha (2061_CR12) 2017; 32 P Fusco (2061_CR9) 2015; 81 T Gan (2061_CR4) 2017; 10 TT Tan (2061_CR15) 2011; 29 S Armstrong (2061_CR19) 2016; 39 PH Pan (2061_CR6) 2006; 15 OP Rosaeg (2061_CR8) 1997; 44 |
| References_xml | – volume: 4 start-page: 105 issue: 2 year: 2014 ident: 2061_CR1 publication-title: Pregnancy Hypertens doi: 10.1016/j.preghy.2014.01.003 – volume: 10 start-page: 2287 year: 2017 ident: 2061_CR4 publication-title: J pain Res doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066 – volume: 106 start-page: 186 issue: 1 year: 2008 ident: 2061_CR16 publication-title: Anesth Analgesia doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000290294.64090.f3 – volume: 81 start-page: 195 issue: 2 year: 2015 ident: 2061_CR9 publication-title: Minerva Anestesiol – volume: 29 start-page: 88 issue: 2 year: 2011 ident: 2061_CR15 publication-title: Eur J Anaesthesiol doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834f015f – volume: 23 start-page: 7 issue: 1 year: 2011 ident: 2061_CR17 publication-title: J Clin Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2010.05.008 – volume: 376 start-page: 631 issue: 9741 year: 2010 ident: 2061_CR2 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6 – volume: 86 start-page: 538 issue: 3 year: 1998 ident: 2061_CR7 publication-title: Anesth Analgesia – volume: 103 start-page: 726 issue: 5 year: 2009 ident: 2061_CR18 publication-title: Br J Anaesth doi: 10.1093/bja/aep235 – volume: 39 start-page: 381 issue: 5 year: 2016 ident: 2061_CR19 publication-title: Drug Saf doi: 10.1007/s40264-015-0386-5 – ident: 2061_CR21 doi: 10.3344/kjp.2016.29.3.193 – volume: 60 start-page: 253 issue: 4 year: 2016 ident: 2061_CR11 publication-title: Indian J Anaesth doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.179451 – volume: 32 start-page: 48 year: 2017 ident: 2061_CR12 publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2017.06.003 – ident: 2061_CR20 doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000066 – ident: 2061_CR10 doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100483 – volume: 16 start-page: 23905 issue: 10 year: 2015 ident: 2061_CR3 publication-title: Int J Mol Sci doi: 10.3390/ijms161023905 – volume: 34 start-page: 586 issue: 6 year: 2009 ident: 2061_CR14 publication-title: Reg Anesth Pain Med doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181b4c922 – volume: 15 start-page: 185 issue: 3 year: 2006 ident: 2061_CR6 publication-title: Int J Obstet Anesth doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.04.004 – volume: 44 start-page: 803 issue: 8 year: 1997 ident: 2061_CR8 publication-title: Can J Anaesth doi: 10.1007/BF03013154 – volume: 13 start-page: 337 issue: 4 year: 2010 ident: 2061_CR13 publication-title: Pain Physician doi: 10.36076/ppj.2010/13/337 – ident: 2061_CR5 doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.12.002 |
| SSID | ssj0017803 |
| Score | 2.3218558 |
| Snippet | Background
The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean... The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean analgesia to... Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean... BackgroundThe transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior postcesarean... Abstract Background The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine has been demonstrated to provide more superior... |
| SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
| SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
| StartPage | 100 |
| SubjectTerms | Abdominal Muscles Analgesia Analgesia, Patient-Controlled Analgesics Analgesics, Opioid - therapeutic use Analysis Anesthesia Anesthesiology Anesthetics, Local Apgar score Blood pressure Body mass index Cesarean section Cesarean Section - adverse effects Clinical trials Critical Care Medicine Emergency Medicine Epidural Female Heart rate Humans Hypertension Infant, Newborn Intensive Internal Medicine Intrathecal morphine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morphine Morphine - adverse effects Narcotics Neonates Pain Pain perception Pain, Postoperative - drug therapy Patients Pharmaceuticals Postoperative analgesia Pre-eclampsia Pre-Eclampsia - chemically induced Pre-Eclampsia - drug therapy Preeclampsia Pregnancy Ropivacaine Saline Solution Severe pre-eclampsia Side effects Software Statistical analysis Surgery Transversus abdominis plane Womens health |
| SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQT1wQqDwCBRkJiQNE9Suxza0gqgoJTlTqzfIr6kLJrprdS_8Sf7IzTnZpioALh5VWsb2yPZ_nsRl_Q8gr6a0K4AfUvuWpBoTw2otkayW17kIy4HLgBefPX9qTU_XprDm7UeoLc8JGeuBx4w4V9E5emQb0pmKxM1FY0fpsWYhSjYEPs2wbTE3vD7RhcntFxrSHA8fAoAb7BB-wYLWdmaHC1v-7Tr5hlG4nTN56a1qM0fF9cm_yIunROPsH5E7u98lPEDldo-3BVIvNQH1Iy0IdQleY0koDGK7vdNFTiIG_gT1DmVD8IxaeIUnteQaB0R9L2HrwPelmyLSUEKegSzw4lz0d8jgIfqNQN4yjwbjmy0wxoSRHQNhqWPh31FOYCk7gKic6ZcRfwNdSJ-QhOT3--PXDST3VYqhjy8y67hptDQu8SV3HTWIeZMFY15rkeQxMKS-jTTxInbPvhNAM5AyxjA_gQMWukY_IXr_s8xNCG82jSNyaELPqvMCaWF3KjPukBPOmInwrGhcnonKsl3HhSsBiWjeK04E4XRGnsxV5sxuzGmk6_tr7PUp81xMptssDAJ6bgOf-BbyKvEa8OFQEML3op_sMsEik1HJHGlmjJGCzIgeznnCA47x5izg3KZDBCcMExqKNqMjLXTOOxKS4Pi830Ad0qzWtFk1FHo8A3S1JttZqcMUqYmbQna153tIvzgu9OC9urYQFvt2i_Ne8_rypT__Hpj4jd0U5pbKW7IDsrS83-Tl4fevwohzwa358VFU priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: Health & Medical Collection dbid: 7X7 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagXLggEK9AQUZC4gBW_UhimwsqiKpCghOV9mY5tkNLS7Jsdi_8Jf4kM052S4roYaVVbK88-41nxs74G0JeKm_LBuIA5msRGWiIYF5Gy0qlddtEAyEHXnD-_KU-Pik_LarFdOA2TGmVW5uYDXXsA56RH0jDJQbnlXy3_MmwahS-XZ1KaNwktzJ1GeizXuw2XEIbrrYXZUx9MAjcHjDwUvABP8bszBllzv5_LfNfrulq2uSVd6fZJR3dJXemWJIejuDfIzdSd5_8BuDpGj0QJlxsBuqb2GcCEbrExFbagPs6p2cdhZ3wd_BqiAzF41h4hlS1pwlgoz96AAAiULoZEs2FxClYFA8hZkeHNA6C38gEDuNocLFplSimlaQAerYczvxb6ilMBSfwK0U65cVfwNdcLeQBOTn6-PXDMZsqMrBQc7NmbaWt4Y2oYtsKE7kveeC8rU30IjS8LL0KNopG6ZR8K6XmgDbsaHwDYVRoK_WQ7HV9lx4TWmkRZBTWNCGVrZdYGauNiQsfS8m9KYjYQuPCRFeOVTMuXN62mNqNcDqA02U4nS3I692Y5UjWcW3v94j4ricSbecH_eqbm9atK0FZoy9NBcoHwrYmSCtrnyxvgiprUZBXqC8OzQFML_jpVgMIicRa7lAjd5Tilhdkf9YTlnGYN281zk1mZHCXSl-QF7tmHImpcV3qN9AHLKw1tZZVQR6NCroTSdXWagjICmJmqjuTed7SnZ1mknGRg1sFAr7ZavnlvP7_pz65Xoyn5LbM608xxffJ3nq1Sc8gqls3z_PS_QMnAUzR priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: SpringerLink Journals (ICM) dbid: U2A link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lj9MwELZgkRAXxJvAgoyExAEi_EpicyuI1QppOVFpb5ZjO2yXJama9sJf4k8y4ySFLA-JQ6Uq9kR2v3nW4xlCnktnVA1-QO5KHnLgEJ47EUyuZFU1ddDgcuAF55OP5fFSfTgtTsdLYf2U7T4dSSZNncRal697js59DjYGPmCFcnOVXCsgdkdxXIrF_uyg0kxO12P-SDczQalS_-_6-BeDdDlZ8tKJaTJER7fIzdGDpIsB8tvkSmzvkOsn4xn5XfIdkKdbNEGYcbHrqatDlyqI0DVmttIa7NcXumophMLnYNYQGor_x8IzrFV7FgE3-rUDBOCFdNdHmjqJU1ApDnzMlvZxIIJ3pAoOAzXY2LiJFPNKogdGW_cr94Y6CkvBBXyLgY6J8RfwNbULuUeWR-8_vTvOx5YMuS-Z3uZNURnNal6EpuE6MKeYZ6wpdXDc10wpJ70JvJZVjK4RomIAN4Q0rgY_yjeFvE8O2q6NDwktKu5F4EbXPqrGCWyN1YTIuAtKMKczwieUrB_rlWPbjAub4hZd2gFZC8jahKw1GXm5p1kP1Tr-Ofstgr-fiZW204Nu89mOgmsVcGtwShdgt2GzjfbCiNJFw2ovVckz8gJZx6I-gOV5N15rgE1iZS27qLB4lGSGZeRwNhPk2M-HJ-azox7prdBMYEhaiIw82w8jJebGtbHbwRxQsUaXlSgy8mDg1f2WZGlMBR5ZRvSMi2d7no-0q7NUZZwn71bCBl9NDP9zXX__UR_93_TH5IZIoilzyQ7JwXazi0_AzdvWT5NU_wDgE0zl priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
| Title | The transversus abdominis plane block in conjunction with intrathecal morphine use after cesarean section in women with severe pre-eclampsia: a randomized controlled trial |
| URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12871-023-02061-9 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36997853 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2802999652 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2793986725 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10061731 https://doaj.org/article/4977da48529940cf8c2926ae90bc3461 |
| Volume | 23 |
| hasFullText | 1 |
| inHoldings | 1 |
| isFullTextHit | |
| isPrint | |
| link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELf28cILAvEVGJWRkHiAgO182EZCqK02TUib0ESlihfLsZ2tUNLStBLwL_FPcnaSjozBAw-N2tiX2rk7_-6S8x1CTxMt0wLsgFjn1MYgITTWzMo4TTgvCyvA5PAbnE9O8-NJ-m6aTXdQV-6ovYH1ta6dryc1Wc1ffvv6_S0o_Jug8CJ_VVNv9seAPvABfIrlLtoHZMq9M3aSXr5V4IIk3caZa-l64BRy-P-5Uv8GVVfDKK-8Sw0QdXQL3WxtSzxshOE22nHVHfQTBAGvPSL5AIxNjXVhFyGhCF76QFdcAJx9xrMKg2f8CVDOcwr7x7NwzqeuvXDARvxlAQwBixRvaodDYXEMK4wGk7PCtWuI4BohoUNDDZDrVg77MBNnQO6W9Uy_xhrDUPwAfjiL2zj5OXwN1UPuosnR4YfxcdxWaIhNTsQ6LjMuBSloZsuSCkt0SgwhZS6spqYgaaoTIy0tEu6cLhnjBLgPHo4uwKwyZZbcQ3vVonIPEM44NcxSKQrj0lIzXymrtI5QbVNGtIgQ7VijTJu-3FfRmKvgxohcNexUwE4V2KlkhJ5vaZZN8o5_9h55jm97-sTb4cRida5aPVYpCK_VqcgAxmGypTBMslw7SQqTpDmN0DMvL8oLLAzP6HaXA0zSJ9pSQ-5zSSVEkggd9HqCWpt-cydxqtMKxQRh3kPNWISebJs9pQ-Vq9xiA31gxZUi5yyL0P1GQLdTSnIpORhoERI90e3Nud9SzS5C0nEajN0EJviik_LLcf39pj78_396hG6woJtJnJADtLdebdxjsADXxQDt8ikfoP3R4en7M_g1zseD8DRlEBQejmejj3CcsOEvLGJh-Q |
| linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
| linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3daxQxEA-lfdAXUfxarRpB8UGXJtmvRBBpteVq20Okhb7FbJK1p3XvvL1D9F8S_Budye5evYp968PBsUmOzM0vM79sJjOEPEmMSkvgAbHJuYsBITw2wqk4TYqiKp0EyoEXnA-G-eAofXecHa-Q3_1dGAyr7G1iMNRubPEd-YaQTCA5z8TrybcYq0bh6WpfQqOFxZ7_8R22bM2r3beg36dC7GwfvhnEXVWB2OZMzuIqK5RkJc9cVXHpmEmZZazKpTPclixNTWKV42VSeG8qIQoGMwZWbkqgArbCKhFg8tdSvNG6Sta2tofvPyzOLQrJkv5qjsw3Go4bkhj8InzAc8Zqyf2FKgH_-oK_nOH5QM1zp7XBCe5cJ9c69ko3W7jdICu-vkl-AdToDH0ehnjMG2pKNw4pS-gEQ2lpCQ7zCx3VFPben8GPIhYovgCGZ5gc98QDUOjXMagcOC-dN56G0uUUbJgBUlvTxreD4DdCyoh2NDh1P_UUA1m8BWRPmpF5SQ2FqeAEfnpHu0j8U_ga6pPcIkeXoq3bZLUe1_4uoVnBrXBcydL6tDICa3FVzjNuXCqYkRHhvWq07RKkY52OUx02SjLXrTo1qFMHdWoVkeeLMZM2PciFvbdQ44uemNo7PBhPP-nOUugUloczqcwA7iBsJa1QIjdesdImac4j8gzxotEAwfSs6e5RgJCYyktvFpitKmGKRWR9qScYDrvc3CNOd4ar0WfLLCKPF804EoPxaj-eQx-w6UrmhcgicqcF6EKkJFeqAAoYEbkE3SWZl1vq0UlIa84DnU5AwBc9ys_m9f8_9d7FYjwiVwaHB_t6f3e4d59cFWEtJnHC1snqbDr3D4BTzsqH3UKm5ONl244_WH-LiA |
| linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSBUXxJtAASMhcYCofiWxuZXCqjxacaBSb5ZjO3ShZFeb3Qt_iT_JjJNdmvKQOKy0iu3IszPjb7wef0PIU-mMqiEOyF3JQw4WwnMngsmVrKqmDhpCDrzgfHhUHhyrdyfFyblb_CnbfX0k2d9pQJamdrk7D03v4rrc7TgG-jngDXwAkXJzmVxRCH14XFvub84RKs3k-qrMH8eN4Cix9v--Np8Dp4uJkxdOTxMoTa6Ta0M0Sfd69d8gl2J7k2wfDuflt8gPsAK6RDjC7ItVR10dZolNhM4xy5XWgGVf6bSlIP8XgDhUE8X_ZuEZ8taeRtAh_TYDbcAL6aqLNFUVp7C8OIg3W9rFfhC8I7E59KMBb-MiUswxiR6Mbt5N3UvqKEwFJ_A9BjokyZ_B11Q65DY5nrz5tH-QD-UZcl8yvcybojKa1bwITcN1YE4xz1hT6uC4r5lSTnoTeC2rGF0jRMVA9bC9cTXEVL4p5B2y1c7aeI_QouJeBG507aNqnMAyWU2IjLugBHM6I3ytJesH7nIsoXFm0x5Gl7bXrAXN2qRZazLyfDNm3jN3_LP3K1T-pieybqcHs8VnOzixVWC5wSldAIaDsI32wojSRcNqL1XJM_IMTcfi2gDT82644gBCIsuW3auQSEoywzKyM-oJPu3HzWvjs8Oa0lmhmcDtaSEy8mTTjCMxT66NsxX0geXW6LISRUbu9ra6EUmWxlQQnWVEj6x4JPO4pZ2eJsZxniJdCQK-WBv8r3n9_Ue9_3_dH5Ptj68n9sPbo_cPyFWRvFTmku2QreViFR9C9LesHyUH_wn5AFP- |
| openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+transversus+abdominis+plane+block+in+conjunction+with+intrathecal+morphine+use+after+cesarean+section+in+women+with+severe+pre-eclampsia%3A+a+randomized+controlled+trial&rft.jtitle=BMC+anesthesiology&rft.au=Yan%2C+Zhi-rong&rft.au=Chen%2C+Li-juan&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Su-jing&rft.au=Zhang%2C+Long-xin&rft.date=2023-03-30&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1471-2253&rft.volume=23&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12871-023-02061-9&rft.externalDocID=PMC10061731 |
| thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |
| thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |
| thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2253&client=summon |