Effect the accumulation of bioactive constituents of a medicinal plant (Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bge.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community

Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBMC plant biology Vol. 23; no. 1; p. 597
Main Authors Wu, Yan-Hong, Qin, Yong, Cai, Qing-Qing, Liu, Min, He, Dong-Mei, Chen, Xin, Wang, Hai, Yan, Zhu-Yun
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central Ltd 28.11.2023
BioMed Central
BMC
Subjects
Acaulospora laevis
Accumulation
Acids
active ingredients
Agricultural chemicals
Agricultural development
Agricultural production
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
Biofertilizer
Biofertilizers
Biological activity
Biomass
Colonization
Constituents
Design factors
Evaluation
family
Fertilizers
Fungi
Glomus
Growth
Herbal medicine
Identification and classification
Influence
Ingredients
Inoculation
Medical research
Medicinal plants
Medicine, Botanic
Medicine, Herbal
Metabolism
Metabolites
Phenolic acids
Phenols
Plant resistance
pot culture
Productivity
Sage
Salvia miltiorrhiza
Sucrose
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable development
Tanshinones
Traditional Chinese medicine
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae
China
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Abstract Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method. Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members. This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
AbstractList BACKGROUND: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method. RESULTS: Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members. CONCLUSION: This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method.BACKGROUNDArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method.Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members.RESULTSThirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members.This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.CONCLUSIONThis study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method. Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members. This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
Abstract Background Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method. Results Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members. Conclusion This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
BackgroundArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method.ResultsThirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members.ConclusionThis study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community.
Background Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for improving the quality and yield of medicinal plants. Despite the widespread distribution of AMFs in Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge's roots, research on the impact of multiple AMFs on biomass and active ingredient accumulations has not been conducted. In this study, the effects of five native AMFs (Glomus formosanum, Septoglomus constrictum, Rhizophagus manihotis, Acaulospora laevis, and Ambispora gerdemannii) and twenty-six communities on the root biomass and active ingredient concentrations of S. miltiorrhiza were assessed using the total factor design method. Results Thirty-one treatment groups formed symbiotic relationships with S. miltiorrhiza based on the pot culture results, and the colonization rate ranged from 54.83% to 89.97%. AMF communities had higher colonization rates and total phenolic acid concentration than single AMF, and communities also appeared to have higher root fresh weight, dry weight, and total phenolic acid concentration than single inoculations. As AMF richness increased, there was a rising trend in root biomass and total tanshinone accumulations (ATTS), while total phenolic acid accumulations (ATP) showed a decreasing trend. This suggests that plant productivity was influenced by the AMF richness, with higher inoculation benefits observed when the communities contained three or four AMFs. Additionally, the affinities of AMF members were also connected to plant productivity. The inoculation effect of closely related AMFs within the same family, such as G. formosanum, S. constrictum, and R. manihotis, consistently yielded lower than that of mono-inoculation when any combinations were applied. The co-inoculation of S. miltiorrhiza with nearby or distant AMFs from two families, such as G. formosanum, R. manihotis, and Ac. laevis or Am. gerdemannii resulted in an increase of ATP and ATTS by more than 50%. AMF communities appear to be more beneficial to the yield of bioactive constituents than the single AMF, but overall community inoculation effects are related to the composition of AMFs and the relationship between members. Conclusion This study reveals that the AMF community has great potential to improve the productivity and the accumulation of bioactive constituents in S. miltiorrhiza, indicating that it is an effective way to achieve sustainable agricultural development through using the AMF community. Keywords: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Salvia miltiorrhiza, Biomass, Tanshinones, Phenolic acids, Biofertilizer
ArticleNumber 597
Audience Academic
Author Cai, Qing-Qing
Wu, Yan-Hong
He, Dong-Mei
Chen, Xin
Yan, Zhu-Yun
Wang, Hai
Qin, Yong
Liu, Min
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Yan-Hong
  surname: Wu
  fullname: Wu, Yan-Hong
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Yong
  surname: Qin
  fullname: Qin, Yong
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Qing-Qing
  surname: Cai
  fullname: Cai, Qing-Qing
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Min
  surname: Liu
  fullname: Liu, Min
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Dong-Mei
  surname: He
  fullname: He, Dong-Mei
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Xin
  surname: Chen
  fullname: Chen, Xin
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Hai
  surname: Wang
  fullname: Wang, Hai
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Zhu-Yun
  surname: Yan
  fullname: Yan, Zhu-Yun
BookMark eNqFks1u1DAUhSNURH_gBVhZYtMuMtiO49grVKoCIxUhUVhbN46T8SiJi-2MZngFXhrPj4CpECgLW77fObJPznl2MrrRZNlLgmeECP46ECoqnGNa5JhxLPL1k-yMsIrklFJ58sf-NDsPYYkxqQSTz7LTQqQtY_ws-3HbtkZHFBcGgdbTMPUQrRuRa1FtHehoVwZpN4Zo42TGGLYTQINprLYj9OihhzGiy3voVxbQR9snufcL-x3Q287MrlC9QeDrKehk7dGw0Ydxj9pp7GwyH4ZptHHzPHvaQh_Mi8N6kX19d_vl5kN-9-n9_Ob6LtfpkTGXZdMIqGlLDa6pBiANLmTJGyk0MA6ADYey0QYolJoXTGrZcslJTSghtCwusvnet3GwVA_eDuA3yoFVuwPnOwU-Wt0bVYABwnVLCAYGuKoBoIBkLBrCKNt6vdl7PUx1ykSnhDz0R6bHk9EuVOdWimAuir3D5cHBu2-TCVENNmjTp1iNm4IqSFmUkkgs_4tSIUua2B366hG6dJNP_ytREqccKlzi31QH6bF2bF26o96aquuqYiUWJSeJmv2FSl9jBpuqYVqbzo8EV0eCxESzjh1MIaj5_edjlu5Z7V0I3rS_siNYbWuu9jVXqeZqV3O1TiLxSKRt3PU23cz2_5L-BBzrAz0
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3390_agronomy14112695
crossref_primary_10_3390_molecules29133235
Cites_doi 10.3390/molecules16032259
10.1371/journal.pone.0036695
10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.087
10.1186/s13568-020-01137-w
10.3389/fphar.2019.00753
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02410.x
10.1111/plb.12608
10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y
10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00708.x
10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.002
10.1111/mec.12625
10.1051/agro/2009054
10.3390/app7010068
10.3389/fpls.2020.580753
10.1007/s00253-018-9433-3
10.1016/j.jplph.2012.08.022
10.1038/ismej.2014.207
10.1139/b84-290
10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100204
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.178
10.1126/science.1143082
10.1007/s13199-012-0197-8
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04348.x
10.1007/s11104-010-0417-z
10.1111/pce.12667
10.1128/AEM.02889-05
10.1007/s00572-020-00957-9
10.1055/s-0029-1186180
10.1111/1365-2745.12788
10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.04.003
10.1016/j.funbio.2018.05.009
10.1111/nph.15119
10.1007/s42729-021-00721-8
10.3389/fpls.2018.01801
10.1080/13102818.2018.1532318
10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113498
10.1007/s00203-019-01653-9
10.1006/tpbi.2002.1579
10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
10.3103/S1068367415060245
10.1126/science.1060391
10.3389/fsufs.2023.1124688
10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103846
10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108322
10.3389/fpls.2020.612299
10.1007/s11738-014-1750-2
10.1016/0167-8809(96)01040-7
10.3390/ijms19010270
10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.004
10.3852/16-042
10.1111/nph.13447
10.1016/j.jplph.2015.06.015
10.2478/hppj-2019-0007
10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463
10.7717/peerj.1266
10.1007/s00572-022-01079-0
10.3329/jsr.v1i2.1675
10.1007/s11274-012-1033-2
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01039.x
10.1007/s00572-019-00898-y
10.1016/j.jgr.2017.08.005
10.1016/j.agee.2022.108240
10.1371/journal.pone.0072561
10.1007/s11104-014-2162-1
10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112375
10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00008-5
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.010
10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.030
10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02294.x
10.1007/s10886-017-0921-1
10.1186/1471-2164-15-221
10.1111/nph.14178
10.1007/s00572-013-0484-0
10.1023/A:1015522100497
10.3389/fmicb.2017.02516
10.1007/s00572-015-0651-6
10.1126/science.1208473
10.5740/jaoacint.19-0133
10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114002
10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.05.007
10.1007/s00572-011-0391-1
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
2023. The Author(s).
The Author(s) 2023
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2023 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2023. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
– notice: 2023. The Author(s).
– notice: The Author(s) 2023
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
ISR
3V.
7X2
7X7
7XB
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
ATCPS
AZQEC
BBNVY
BENPR
BHPHI
CCPQU
DWQXO
FYUFA
GHDGH
GNUQQ
HCIFZ
K9.
LK8
M0K
M0S
M1P
M7N
M7P
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s12870-023-04608-x
DatabaseName CrossRef
Gale In Context: Science
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Agricultural Science Collection
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability (subscription)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
ProQuest Central Essentials
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central Korea
Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Central Student
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Biological Sciences
Agricultural Science Database
Health & Medical Collection (Alumni)
Proquest Medical Database
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
Agricultural Science Database
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Central Student
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
SciTech Premium Collection
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
Natural Science Collection
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection
Biological Science Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Biological Science Collection
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
Agricultural Science Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
Biological Science Database
ProQuest SciTech Collection
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
AGRICOLA
AGRICOLA - Academic
DatabaseTitleList AGRICOLA
MEDLINE - Academic


Agricultural Science Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Botany
EISSN 1471-2229
EndPage 597
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_3aea16cf110a4a07baaa3aa2a8d14245
PMC10683245
A774508561
10_1186_s12870_023_04608_x
GeographicLocations China
GeographicLocations_xml – name: China
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: ;
  grantid: 2021YFS0045
– fundername: ;
  grantid: 81973416
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
23N
2WC
2XV
53G
5GY
5VS
6J9
7X2
7X7
88E
8FE
8FH
8FI
8FJ
A8Z
AAFWJ
AAHBH
AAJSJ
AASML
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AFRAH
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHYZX
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
APEBS
ATCPS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BBNVY
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BHPHI
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CITATION
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
HCIFZ
HMCUK
HYE
IAG
IAO
IEP
IGH
IGS
IHR
INH
INR
ISR
ITC
KQ8
LK8
M0K
M1P
M48
M7P
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
XSB
PMFND
3V.
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
GNUQQ
K9.
M7N
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQGLB
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
7S9
L.6
5PM
PUEGO
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-95dd8ab2f2e0b2caa1d03956d98ca46aa0e6a5dcea2a5c6349c9f6961b1211253
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1471-2229
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:32:08 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 18:36:23 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 22:29:40 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 06:41:19 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 19:23:27 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:23:29 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:17:51 EDT 2025
Fri Jun 27 05:59:06 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:01:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:52:38 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
License Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c608t-95dd8ab2f2e0b2caa1d03956d98ca46aa0e6a5dcea2a5c6349c9f6961b1211253
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1186/s12870-023-04608-x
PMID 38017446
PQID 2902117050
PQPubID 44650
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_3aea16cf110a4a07baaa3aa2a8d14245
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_10683245
proquest_miscellaneous_3153591909
proquest_miscellaneous_2895259109
proquest_journals_2902117050
gale_infotracmisc_A774508561
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A774508561
gale_incontextgauss_ISR_A774508561
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12870_023_04608_x
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12870_023_04608_x
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2023-11-28
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2023-11-28
PublicationDate_xml – month: 11
  year: 2023
  text: 2023-11-28
  day: 28
PublicationDecade 2020
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
PublicationTitle BMC plant biology
PublicationYear 2023
Publisher BioMed Central Ltd
BioMed Central
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BioMed Central
– name: BMC
References H Maherali (4608_CR44) 2007; 316
W Tarraf (4608_CR52) 2017; 102
E Pichersky (4608_CR59) 2018; 220
JA Vorholt (4608_CR70) 2017; 22
S Chen (4608_CR76) 2017; 8
G Li (4608_CR32) 2014; 25
RQ Zhang (4608_CR61) 2013; 170
CM Wallis (4608_CR58) 2020; 11
Y Yang (4608_CR20) 2017; 7
PA Venail (4608_CR93) 2013; 8
ET Kiers (4608_CR86) 2011; 333
FC Lu (4608_CR50) 2015; 3
A Rodriguez (4608_CR90) 2015; 9
JW Spatafora (4608_CR2) 2016; 108
YP Guo (4608_CR24) 2017; 11
J Liu (4608_CR4) 2020; 10
SL Woo (4608_CR69) 2018; 9
TM Bowles (4608_CR77) 2016; 566
4608_CR1
M Giovannetti (4608_CR30) 1980; 84
C Thonar (4608_CR79) 2014; 23
N Alkan (4608_CR64) 2006; 72
RH Posada (4608_CR91) 2008; 104
E Pellegrino (4608_CR87) 2011; 43
MM Hart (4608_CR23) 2013; 59
LS Zhou (4608_CR85) 2018; 19
JM Phillips (4608_CR28) 1970; 55
T Crossay (4608_CR21) 2019; 29
MC Brundrett (4608_CR29) 1984; 62
P Gosling (4608_CR45) 2016; 26
J Huang (4608_CR94) 2021; 160
M Liu (4608_CR25) 2017; 42
E Pellegrino (4608_CR84) 2014; 68
V Chaudhary (4608_CR9) 2008; 40
TT Edathil (4608_CR67) 1996; 59
A Paravar (4608_CR8) 2021; 172
R Kapoor (4608_CR38) 2002; 18
S Zubek (4608_CR39) 2012; 22
M Parihar (4608_CR96) 2019; 201
T Zhang (4608_CR7) 2018; 117
RJ Liu (4608_CR31) 2007
JR Powell (4608_CR95) 2018; 220
E Verbruggen (4608_CR89) 2013; 197
RK Singla (4608_CR57) 2019; 102
N Garg (4608_CR5) 2010; 30
S Yachi (4608_CR82) 1999; 96
S Gianinazzi (4608_CR11) 2010; 20
Y Zeng (4608_CR12) 2013; 23
4608_CR40
H Li (4608_CR43) 2008; 178
ZN Liu (4608_CR72) 2017; 26
SE Smith (4608_CR6) 2011; 62
4608_CR46
D Redecker (4608_CR27) 2013; 23
A Michalak (4608_CR56) 2006; 15
Y Xu (4608_CR15) 2018; 32
I Zouari (4608_CR62) 2014; 15
YY Zhao (4608_CR13) 2022; 32
NA Soudzilovskaia (4608_CR37) 2015; 208
TJ Thirkell (4608_CR36) 2017; 105
D Tilman (4608_CR92) 2001; 294
L Pistelli (4608_CR51) 2017; 19
MH Walter (4608_CR63) 2000; 21
X Wang (4608_CR18) 2014; 39
EM Hill (4608_CR33) 2018; 44
J Ren (4608_CR16) 2019; 10
H Maherali (4608_CR83) 2012; 7
S Parvin (4608_CR75) 2020; 30
J Zhao (4608_CR17) 2011; 16
P Soti (4608_CR88) 2023; 342
P Mu (4608_CR71) 2022; 53
J Jansa (4608_CR68) 2008; 177
BC Muniz (4608_CR49) 2021; 167
Z Kheyri (4608_CR14) 2022; 22
AJ Cheruth (4608_CR10) 2009; 1
4608_CR35
T Crossay (4608_CR22) 2020; 14
AJ Golubski (4608_CR73) 2002; 62
XJ Qi (4608_CR54) 2016; 36
4608_CR78
X Qi (4608_CR48) 2012; 28
SE Smith (4608_CR81) 2004; 162
A Hodge (4608_CR34) 2015; 386
TAF de Souza (4608_CR47) 2015; 41
M Nell (4608_CR3) 2010; 76
A Berruti (4608_CR66) 2015; 6
MC Enebe (4608_CR55) 2019; 103
B Mechri (4608_CR60) 2015; 185
EE Thomloudi (4608_CR65) 2019; 12
I Ortas (4608_CR74) 2014; 63
K Zitterl-Eglseer (4608_CR53) 2015; 37
4608_CR26
N Ceccarelli (4608_CR80) 2010; 335
JH Li (4608_CR19) 2016; 25
MVL Pedone-Bonfim (4608_CR42) 2018; 122
TJ Thirkell (4608_CR41) 2016; 39
References_xml – volume: 16
  start-page: 2259
  issue: 3
  year: 2011
  ident: 4608_CR17
  publication-title: Molecules
  doi: 10.3390/molecules16032259
– volume: 7
  start-page: e36695
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 4608_CR83
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036695
– volume: 117
  start-page: 13
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR7
  publication-title: Ind Crops Prod
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.087
– volume: 10
  start-page: 200
  issue: 1
  year: 2020
  ident: 4608_CR4
  publication-title: AMB Express
  doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01137-w
– volume: 10
  start-page: 753
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR16
  publication-title: Front Pharmacol
  doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00753
– volume: 178
  start-page: 852
  issue: 4
  year: 2008
  ident: 4608_CR43
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02410.x
– volume: 19
  start-page: 926
  issue: 6
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR51
  publication-title: Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1111/plb.12608
– volume: 23
  start-page: 515
  issue: 7
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR27
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0486-y
– volume: 21
  start-page: 571
  issue: 6
  year: 2000
  ident: 4608_CR63
  publication-title: Plant J
  doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00708.x
– volume: 25
  start-page: 7
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR19
  publication-title: Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica
– volume: 6
  start-page: 1559
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR66
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
– volume: 43
  start-page: 367
  issue: 2
  year: 2011
  ident: 4608_CR87
  publication-title: Soil Biol Biochem
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.002
– volume: 36
  start-page: 509
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR54
  publication-title: J Hebei Univ (Natural Sci Edition)
– volume: 23
  start-page: 733
  issue: 3
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR79
  publication-title: Mol Ecol
  doi: 10.1111/mec.12625
– volume: 30
  start-page: 581
  issue: 3
  year: 2010
  ident: 4608_CR5
  publication-title: Agron Sustain Dev
  doi: 10.1051/agro/2009054
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1574
  issue: 9
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR18
  publication-title: China J Chin Materia Med
– volume: 7
  start-page: 68
  issue: 1
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR20
  publication-title: Appl Sci
  doi: 10.3390/app7010068
– volume: 11
  start-page: 580753
  year: 2020
  ident: 4608_CR58
  publication-title: Front Plant Sci
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.580753
– volume: 103
  start-page: 9
  issue: 1
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR55
  publication-title: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9433-3
– volume: 170
  start-page: 74
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR61
  publication-title: J Plant Physiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.08.022
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1053
  issue: 5
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR90
  publication-title: ISME J
  doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.207
– volume: 62
  start-page: 2128
  issue: 10
  year: 1984
  ident: 4608_CR29
  publication-title: Can J Bot
  doi: 10.1139/b84-290
– volume: 26
  start-page: 85
  issue: 11
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR72
  publication-title: Acta Pratacul Sin
– volume: 14
  start-page: 100204
  year: 2020
  ident: 4608_CR22
  publication-title: Rhizosphere
  doi: 10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100204
– volume: 566
  start-page: 1223
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR77
  publication-title: Sci Total Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.178
– volume: 316
  start-page: 1746
  issue: 5832
  year: 2007
  ident: 4608_CR44
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1143082
– volume: 59
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR23
  publication-title: Symbiosis
  doi: 10.1007/s13199-012-0197-8
– volume: 197
  start-page: 1104
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR89
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04348.x
– volume: 335
  start-page: 311
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2010
  ident: 4608_CR80
  publication-title: Plant Soil
  doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0417-z
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1683
  issue: 8
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR41
  publication-title: Plant, Cell Environ
  doi: 10.1111/pce.12667
– volume: 72
  start-page: 4192
  issue: 6
  year: 2006
  ident: 4608_CR64
  publication-title: Appl Environ Microbiol
  doi: 10.1128/AEM.02889-05
– volume: 30
  start-page: 431
  issue: 4
  year: 2020
  ident: 4608_CR75
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-020-00957-9
– volume: 76
  start-page: 393
  issue: 4
  year: 2010
  ident: 4608_CR3
  publication-title: Planta Med
  doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1186180
– volume: 15
  start-page: 523
  issue: 4
  year: 2006
  ident: 4608_CR56
  publication-title: Pol J Environ Stud
– volume: 105
  start-page: 921
  issue: 4
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR36
  publication-title: J Ecol
  doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12788
– volume: 40
  start-page: 174
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 4608_CR9
  publication-title: Appl Soil Ecol
  doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.04.003
– volume: 122
  start-page: 918
  issue: 9
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR42
  publication-title: Fungal Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2018.05.009
– volume: 220
  start-page: 1059
  issue: 4
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR95
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/nph.15119
– volume: 22
  start-page: 1160
  issue: 1
  year: 2022
  ident: 4608_CR14
  publication-title: J Soil Sci Plant Nutr
  doi: 10.1007/s42729-021-00721-8
– volume: 9
  start-page: 1801
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR69
  publication-title: Front Plant Sci
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01801
– volume: 32
  start-page: 1367
  issue: 6
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR15
  publication-title: Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip
  doi: 10.1080/13102818.2018.1532318
– volume: 167
  start-page: 113498
  year: 2021
  ident: 4608_CR49
  publication-title: Ind Crops Prod
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113498
– volume: 201
  start-page: 723
  issue: 6
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR96
  publication-title: Arch Microbiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01653-9
– volume: 62
  start-page: 47
  issue: 1
  year: 2002
  ident: 4608_CR73
  publication-title: Theor Popul Biol
  doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1579
– volume: 20
  start-page: 519
  issue: 8
  year: 2010
  ident: 4608_CR11
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-010-0333-3
– volume: 41
  start-page: 454
  issue: 6
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR47
  publication-title: Russ Agric Sci
  doi: 10.3103/S1068367415060245
– volume: 294
  start-page: 843
  issue: 5543
  year: 2001
  ident: 4608_CR92
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1060391
– volume-title: Mycorrhizology
  year: 2007
  ident: 4608_CR31
– ident: 4608_CR78
  doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1124688
– volume: 62
  start-page: 227
  year: 2011
  ident: 4608_CR6
  publication-title: Annu Rev Plant Biol
  doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103846
– volume: 160
  start-page: 108322
  year: 2021
  ident: 4608_CR94
  publication-title: Soil Biol Biochem
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108322
– ident: 4608_CR46
  doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.612299
– volume: 37
  start-page: 21
  issue: 2
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR53
  publication-title: Acta Physiol Plant
  doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1750-2
– volume: 59
  start-page: 63
  issue: 1–2
  year: 1996
  ident: 4608_CR67
  publication-title: Agric Ecosyst Environ
  doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(96)01040-7
– ident: 4608_CR26
– volume: 19
  start-page: E270
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR85
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci Vol
  doi: 10.3390/ijms19010270
– volume: 42
  start-page: 70
  issue: 001
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR25
  publication-title: China J Chin Meteria Med
– volume: 22
  start-page: 142
  issue: 2
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR70
  publication-title: Cell Host Microbe
  doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.07.004
– volume: 11
  start-page: 66
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR24
  publication-title: Bull Agricultural Sci Technol
– volume: 108
  start-page: 1028
  issue: 5
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR2
  publication-title: Mycologia
  doi: 10.3852/16-042
– volume: 53
  start-page: 2506
  issue: 8
  year: 2022
  ident: 4608_CR71
  publication-title: Chin Herb Med
– volume: 208
  start-page: 280
  issue: 1
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR37
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/nph.13447
– volume: 185
  start-page: 40
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR60
  publication-title: J Plant Physiol
  doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2015.06.015
– volume: 12
  start-page: 61
  issue: 2
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR65
  publication-title: Hellenic Plant Protection Journal
  doi: 10.2478/hppj-2019-0007
– volume: 96
  start-page: 1463
  issue: 4
  year: 1999
  ident: 4608_CR82
  publication-title: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
  doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463
– volume: 3
  start-page: e1266
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR50
  publication-title: PeerJ
  doi: 10.7717/peerj.1266
– volume: 32
  start-page: 221
  issue: 3–4
  year: 2022
  ident: 4608_CR13
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-022-01079-0
– volume: 1
  start-page: 381
  issue: 2
  year: 2009
  ident: 4608_CR10
  publication-title: J Sci Res
  doi: 10.3329/jsr.v1i2.1675
– volume: 28
  start-page: 2257
  issue: 5
  year: 2012
  ident: 4608_CR48
  publication-title: World J Microbiol Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1033-2
– volume: 162
  start-page: 511
  issue: 2
  year: 2004
  ident: 4608_CR81
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01039.x
– volume: 29
  start-page: 325
  issue: 4
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR21
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-019-00898-y
– ident: 4608_CR40
  doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2017.08.005
– volume: 342
  start-page: 108240
  year: 2023
  ident: 4608_CR88
  publication-title: Agric Ecosyst Environ
  doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108240
– volume: 25
  start-page: 1766
  issue: 19
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR32
  publication-title: Chin Pharm
– volume: 8
  start-page: e72561
  issue: 9
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR93
  publication-title: PLoS ONE
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072561
– volume: 386
  start-page: 1
  issue: 1–2
  year: 2015
  ident: 4608_CR34
  publication-title: Plant Soil
  doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2162-1
– ident: 4608_CR1
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112375
– ident: 4608_CR35
  doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804312-7.00008-5
– volume: 84
  start-page: 489
  issue: 3
  year: 1980
  ident: 4608_CR30
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
– volume: 104
  start-page: 132
  issue: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 4608_CR91
  publication-title: J Appl Microbiol
– volume: 102
  start-page: 144
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR52
  publication-title: Ind Crops Prod
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.03.010
– volume: 68
  start-page: 429
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR84
  publication-title: Soil Biol Biochem
  doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.030
– volume: 177
  start-page: 779
  issue: 3
  year: 2008
  ident: 4608_CR68
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02294.x
– volume: 44
  start-page: 198
  issue: 2
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR33
  publication-title: J Chem Ecol
  doi: 10.1007/s10886-017-0921-1
– volume: 15
  start-page: 221
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR62
  publication-title: BMC Genomics
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-221
– volume: 220
  start-page: 692
  issue: 3
  year: 2018
  ident: 4608_CR59
  publication-title: New Phytol
  doi: 10.1111/nph.14178
– volume: 23
  start-page: 253
  issue: 4
  year: 2013
  ident: 4608_CR12
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-013-0484-0
– volume: 18
  start-page: 459
  issue: 5
  year: 2002
  ident: 4608_CR38
  publication-title: World J Microbiol Biotechnol
  doi: 10.1023/A:1015522100497
– volume: 8
  start-page: 2516
  year: 2017
  ident: 4608_CR76
  publication-title: Front Microbiol
  doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02516
– volume: 26
  start-page: 77
  issue: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 4608_CR45
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0651-6
– volume: 333
  start-page: 880
  issue: 6044
  year: 2011
  ident: 4608_CR86
  publication-title: Science
  doi: 10.1126/science.1208473
– volume: 102
  start-page: 1397
  issue: 5
  year: 2019
  ident: 4608_CR57
  publication-title: J AOAC Int
  doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.19-0133
– volume: 172
  start-page: 114002
  year: 2021
  ident: 4608_CR8
  publication-title: Ind Crops Prod
  doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114002
– volume: 55
  start-page: 158
  issue: 1
  year: 1970
  ident: 4608_CR28
  publication-title: Trans Br Mycological Soc
  doi: 10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3
– volume: 63
  start-page: 64
  year: 2014
  ident: 4608_CR74
  publication-title: Eur J Soil Biol
  doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.05.007
– volume: 22
  start-page: 149
  issue: 2
  year: 2012
  ident: 4608_CR39
  publication-title: Mycorrhiza
  doi: 10.1007/s00572-011-0391-1
SSID ssj0017849
Score 2.4162102
Snippet Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as biofertilizers for...
Background Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as...
BackgroundArbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as...
BACKGROUND: Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as...
Abstract Background Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic relationships with various terrestrial plants and have attracted considerable interest as...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Enrichment Source
Index Database
StartPage 597
SubjectTerms Acaulospora laevis
Accumulation
Acids
active ingredients
Agricultural chemicals
Agricultural development
Agricultural production
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi
Arbuscular mycorrhizas
Biofertilizer
Biofertilizers
Biological activity
Biomass
Colonization
Constituents
Design factors
Evaluation
family
Fertilizers
Fungi
Glomus
Growth
Herbal medicine
Identification and classification
Influence
Ingredients
Inoculation
Medical research
Medicinal plants
Medicine, Botanic
Medicine, Herbal
Metabolism
Metabolites
Phenolic acids
Phenols
Plant resistance
pot culture
Productivity
Sage
Salvia miltiorrhiza
Sucrose
Sustainable agriculture
Sustainable development
Tanshinones
Traditional Chinese medicine
vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV1Lb9QwELZQxYEL4ikWCjIICRAKjRPHiY9dRFWQyoFSqTdr7NjbSGlS7QN1-xf6pxk73lUDAi5cM2MrHo8938jjz4S8Bl1IjflxUhYuTThjJkEYohNXeO52W2YukPocfRWHJ_zLaXF646kvXxM20AMPhtvLwQITxmGYAg5pqQEgB8igqv0lrcBeijFvk0zF84Oy4nJzRaYSewvmz_MSjE-hlLFKLkdhKLD1_74n_1oneSPwHNwjdyNipPvDn94nt2z3gNye9ojq1g_J9UA_TBHHUTBmdR6f46K9o7rpIWxn1PRDTYCvmvASoPFMHTu-aNG49O0xtD8aoEdNi83n87PmCuh0Zj-8o3pNAW0_VKzS87WJ4pZiUJw12Hm4Y7JcPyInB5--fzxM4gMLiUEjLBNZ1HUFOnOZTXVmAFid5pgw1bIywAVAagUUOHw0d2FEzqWRTkjBtCeGy4r8Mdnp-s4-IdS50qSyrrWrOa91KRFZcQbO4vrWNYgJYRt7KxPZx_0jGK0KWUgl1DBHCudIhTlSlxPyftvmYuDe-Kv21E_jVtPzZocP6E0qepP6lzdNyCvvBMozY3S-9GYGq8VCfT7-pvYRKCOaRbw5IW-ikutxDAbiTQa0hCfTGmnujjRx6ZqxeONrKm4dC5VJhF2e5CidkJdbsW_py-E6269Qp5IF5q0slX_WyTGWoYr0OtXIj0cmGku65ixQjLNU4FbPi6f_w6jPyJ3MLz3GkqzaJTvL-co-Ryi31C_Cqv0J2H1JzA
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELagcOCCeIotBRmEBAiZxkmcxCfURVQFqRwolXqzxk68jbRNln2gLn-BP81M4l0IiF7jcRR77Jlv4vE3jL0Aq7TF-FjkykcildIJhCFWeEXc7VUe-47U5_hzdnSafjpTZ-GH2yKkVW5sYmeoy9bRP_L9WKM3Iu6X6N3sm6CqUXS6GkpoXGc3iLqMVnV-tg24ZF6kenNRpsj2F5JO9QR6qS6hsRCXA2fUcfb_a5n_zpb8w_0c3mG3A27kB72i77JrVXOP3Ry3iO3W99nPnoSYI5rj4NzqIhTl4q3ntm6hM2rctX1mAOVOUAvwcLKOL55NcYr5qxOYfq-BH9dT7D6fn9c_gI8n1dvX3K45oAb6vFV-sXahecrRNU5qfHl302S5fsBODz98fX8kQpkF4XASlkKrsizAxj6uIhs7AFlGCYZNpS4cpBlAVGWgcPgQg3JZkmqnfaYzaYkeLlbJQ7bTtE31iHHvcxfpsrS-TNPS5hrxVSrBV7jLbQnZiMnNfBsXOMipFMbUdLFIkZleRwZ1ZDodmcsRe7PtM-sZOK6UHpMat5LEnt09aOcTEzajSaACmTmP0AdSiHILAAng8IqSLv6pEXtOi8AQP0ZDCTgTWC0W5uPJF3OAcBkxLaLOEXsZhHyLY3AQ7jPgTBCl1kBybyCJG9gNmzdrzQQDsjC_l_uIPds2U09KimuqdoUyhVYYvcpI_18mQY-GIppkisE6HkzRsKWpzzuicRllaPBTtXv1Fz5mt2LaVFKKuNhjO8v5qnqCUG1pn3b78ReYIEBa
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
Title Effect the accumulation of bioactive constituents of a medicinal plant (Salvia Miltiorrhiza Bge.) by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi community
URI https://www.proquest.com/docview/2902117050
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2895259109
https://www.proquest.com/docview/3153591909
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC10683245
https://doaj.org/article/3aea16cf110a4a07baaa3aa2a8d14245
Volume 23
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1Lb9QwELZKy4EL4ikCZWUQEgcUiJPYiQ8IdVGrgtQKLay04mKNnXi70jZZ9iE1_HrGTnYhUHrJIZ5Yssfj-SYef0PIK9BcaoyPw4zbKEwZMyHCEB1a7rjbyyy2ntTn7FycjtPPEz7ZI9tyR90Erq4N7Vw9qfFy_vbqR_MBDf69N_hcvFsxd1oXovfxiYp5iJjyAD1T5ioanKW_TxWy3MNhhhty6OpYby_RXNtHz1F5Pv9_d-2_Myn_cE0n98jdDlPSo3YR3Cd7ZfWA3B7WiPuah2TREhRTRHoUjNlcdgW7aG2pntXgNzxq6jZrwOVVuBag3ak7dryY4_RT3VBAFbSJq_SywbB1eTH7ie3oG6cz7MFfNVk3j8j45Pjbx9Owq7MQGhzpOpS8KHLQsY3LSMcGgBVRgnFTIXMDqQCISgEcxwgxcCOSVBpphRRMO364mCePyX5VV-UTQq3NTCSLQtsiTQudSQRYKQNbopnrAkRA2HZSlelIyF0tjLnywUguVKsIhYpQXhHqKiBvdt8sWgqOG6WHTlc7SUef7V_Uy6nqrFElUAITxiL2gRSiTANAAji8vHA3_3hAXjpNK0eQUbkMnClsViv16etIHSFeRlCLsDMgrzshW-MYDHQXGnAmHKdWT_KwJ4kWbPrN2wWltgagYonoy3EdRQF5sWt2X7qsuKqsNyiTS47hK4vk_2USdGkoIp1M3lusvSnqt1SzC880ziKBO37Kn948gGfkTuwsh6FZ5Ydkf73clM8Rq631gNzKJtmAHAyPz7-MBv6Px8AbJT5Hw--_AG4lQJY
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV3db9MwELemgQQviE9RGGAQCBAKi9PEiR8QWoGpZese2Cb1zZwdu4vUJaUfsPIv8L_wN3LORyEg9rbX3jlqfOf7iO9-R8hTUJFQmB97cWR9L2RMexiGKM9GDrvdxIEtQX2GB7x_HH4cRaMN8rPphXFllY1NLA11Wmj3jXw7EOiNHPaL_3b6xXNTo9ztajNCo1KLPbP6hinb_M3gPcr3WRDsfjh61_fqqQKe5n6y8ESUpgmowAbGV4EGYKnfxSwhFYmGkAP4hkOUagMBRJp3Q6GF5YIz5dDQAjclAk3-JXS8vkv24tE6wWNxEoqmMSfh23PmbhE99IplAWXinbWcXzkj4F9P8Hd15h_ubvc6uVbHqXSnUqwbZMPkN8nlXoGx5OoW-VGBHlOMHilovTyth4DRwlKVFVAaUaqLqhLB1Wo4CtD6Jh8fPJ2gSOmLQ5h8zYAOswkun81Osu9Ae2Pz-iVVKwoo8apOlp6udE2eUHTF4wwfXna2LFa3yfGFCOAO2cyL3Nwl1NpY-yJNlU3DMFWxwHguZGANWhWVAu8Q1uy31DXmuRu9MZFl7pNwWclIooxkKSN51iGv1mumFeLHudw9J8Y1p0PrLn8oZmNZH37ZBQOMa4uhFoTgxwoAuoCvl6Su0TDqkCdOCaTD48hdwc8YlvO5HBx-kjsYnmMMjVFuhzyvmWyB76Ch7p_AnXAQXi3OrRYnGgzdJje6JmuDNZe_j1eHPF6T3UpXhJebYok8iYgwW2a--D9PFz0osgjHk7T0uLVFbUqenZTA5szn6GDC6N75__ARudI_Gu7L_cHB3n1yNXAHjDEvSLbI5mK2NA8wTFyoh-XZpOTzRRuDX-I4ffE
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect+the+accumulation+of+bioactive+constituents+of+a+medicinal+plant+by+arbuscular+mycorrhizal+fungi+community&rft.jtitle=BMC+plant+biology&rft.au=Wu%2C+Yan-Hong&rft.au=Qin%2C+Yong&rft.au=Cai%2C+Qing-Qing&rft.au=Liu%2C+Min&rft.date=2023-11-28&rft.pub=BioMed+Central+Ltd&rft.issn=1471-2229&rft.eissn=1471-2229&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12870-023-04608-x&rft.externalDocID=A774508561
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1471-2229&client=summon