The prediction of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis with electronic health records: a comparative study of six machine learning models
Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine l...
Saved in:
Published in | BMC medical informatics and decision making Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 115 - 9 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
05.04.2021
BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1472-6947 1472-6947 |
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-021-01480-3 |
Cover
Abstract | Background
Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS.
Methods
Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1).
Results
Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR.
Conclusions
Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS.
Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1).
Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR.
Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Abstract Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS. Methods Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1). Results Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR. Conclusions Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS. Methods Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1). Results Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR. Conclusions Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS. Methods Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1). Results Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR. Conclusions Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS. Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1). Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR. Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS.BACKGROUNDScreening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS.Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1).METHODSRetrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1).Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR.RESULTSOf the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR.Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most.CONCLUSIONSAmong machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression of most CAS patients, early identification is challenging for clinicians, and it may trigger ischemic stroke. Recently, machine learning has shown a strong ability to classify data and a potential for prediction in the medical field. The combined use of machine learning and the electronic health records of patients could provide clinicians with a more convenient and precise method to identify asymptomatic CAS. Methods Retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data of medical check-up subjects from April 19, 2010 to November 15, 2019. Six machine learning models (logistic regression [LR], random forest [RF], decision tree [DT], eXtreme Gradient Boosting [XGB], Gaussian Naïve Bayes [GNB], and K-Nearest Neighbour [KNN]) were used to predict asymptomatic CAS and compared their predictability in terms of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC), accuracy (ACC), and F1 score (F1). Results Of the 18,441 subjects, 6553 were diagnosed with asymptomatic CAS. Compared to DT (AUCROC 0.628, ACC 65.4%, and F1 52.5%), the other five models improved prediction: KNN + 7.6% (0.704, 68.8%, and 50.9%, respectively), GNB + 12.5% (0.753, 67.0%, and 46.8%, respectively), XGB + 16.0% (0.788, 73.4%, and 55.7%, respectively), RF + 16.6% (0.794, 74.5%, and 56.8%, respectively) and LR + 18.1% (0.809, 74.7%, and 59.9%, respectively). The highest achieving model, LR predicted 1045/1966 cases (sensitivity 53.2%) and 3088/3566 non-cases (specificity 86.6%). A tenfold cross-validation scheme further verified the predictive ability of the LR. Conclusions Among machine learning models, LR showed optimal performance in predicting asymptomatic CAS. Our findings set the stage for an early automatic alarming system, allowing a more precise allocation of CAS prevention measures to individuals probably to benefit most. Keywords: Machine learning, Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis, Electronic health records, Prediction |
ArticleNumber | 115 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Zhan, Shuqin Du, Shuang Chen, Mengying Xu, Xi Luo, Jian Zhang, Xiaodong Ma, Shuyin Yao, Qingling Shi, Jinming Qu, Huiyang Cheng, Yuxuan Fan, Jiaxin Zhang, Meijuan Wang, Qian Yang, Shusen |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Jiaxin surname: Fan fullname: Fan, Jiaxin organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 2 givenname: Mengying surname: Chen fullname: Chen, Mengying organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 3 givenname: Jian surname: Luo fullname: Luo, Jian organization: Faculty of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 4 givenname: Shusen surname: Yang fullname: Yang, Shusen organization: School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 5 givenname: Jinming surname: Shi fullname: Shi, Jinming organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 6 givenname: Qingling surname: Yao fullname: Yao, Qingling organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 7 givenname: Xiaodong surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Xiaodong organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 8 givenname: Shuang surname: Du fullname: Du, Shuang organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 9 givenname: Huiyang surname: Qu fullname: Qu, Huiyang organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 10 givenname: Yuxuan surname: Cheng fullname: Cheng, Yuxuan organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 11 givenname: Shuyin surname: Ma fullname: Ma, Shuyin organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 12 givenname: Meijuan surname: Zhang fullname: Zhang, Meijuan organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 13 givenname: Xi surname: Xu fullname: Xu, Xi organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 14 givenname: Qian surname: Wang fullname: Wang, Qian organization: Department of Health Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University – sequence: 15 givenname: Shuqin surname: Zhan fullname: Zhan, Shuqin email: sqzhan@mail.xjtu.edu.cn organization: Department of Neurology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820531$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9ks1q3DAUhU1JaZJpX6CLIuimG6f6teUuCiH0JxDoJl0LWbqeUbClqaRJOo_Qt66cSZpMKMHINlfnfOJenePqwAcPVfWW4BNCZPMxEdoRUmNaFuES1-xFdUR4S-um4-3Bo__D6jilK4xJK5l4VR0yJikWjBxVfy5XgNYRrDPZBY_CgHTaTuscJp2dQUbHkJ1FOq8ghmTG-e0SunF5hWAEk2PwRbcCPZZKBBOiTZ-QRiZMax0L5BpQyhu7ndnJ_UaTNivnAY2go3d-iaZgYUyvq5eDHhO8ufsuqp9fv1yefa8vfnw7Pzu9qE2D21wPXGPbssZKYUVrems5aCFwbzBjlEnGKRjZENJg0hFmeSf7gfWcGLCiaQe2qM53XBv0lVpHN-m4VUE7dVsIcal0LK2PoEzLaA89AUEZ77uml0bAgAfdt9AKwgrr84613vQTWAM-Rz3uQfd3vFupZbhWEpf5c14AH-4AMfzaQMpqcsnAOGoPYZMUFbij5a64KNL3T6RXYRN9GVVREc5o23D5oFrq0oDzQyjnmhmqThshy5nzxS-qk_-oymNhcqakbHClvmd497jRfx3eB6kI5E5gSj5ShEEZl_UcqUJ2oyJYzZlVu8yqkll1m1k1D5E-sd7TnzWxnSkVsV9CfJjGM66_v9H_mA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1177_09544119241291191 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_025_93534_z crossref_primary_10_1155_2024_2991243 crossref_primary_10_3390_jpm12030437 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11255_024_04351_8 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12967_023_04093_8 crossref_primary_10_3389_fphys_2023_1225636 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10278_024_01121_x crossref_primary_10_3389_fendo_2024_1390352 crossref_primary_10_3389_fcvm_2024_1454642 crossref_primary_10_4258_hir_2023_29_3_228 crossref_primary_10_17802_2306_1278_2023_12_3_109_125 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_023_42338_0 |
Cites_doi | 10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342859 10.1002/mp.13361 10.1109/ICSESS.2018.8663753 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042848 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.034 10.1186/s12872-018-0752-1 10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225451 10.3389/fneur.2018.00784 10.1177/0272989X18790963 10.1001/jama.2015.18421 10.1371/journal.pone.0246044 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001146 10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.011 10.1109/BIBM47256.2019.8983295 10.1371/journal.pone.0086703 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673129 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581058 10.1109/ICCCT.2010.5640492 10.1080/21691401.2021.1879823 10.1093/jamia/ocaa088 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.07.020 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00153-1 10.1186/s12936-019-2982-9 10.1038/ajg.2013.332 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 10.1111/jdi.12106 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423159 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1068 10.1186/s13637-016-0049-6 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2 10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1307s 10.1111/1759-7714.13204 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.019 10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235094 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104326 10.1111/acps.13061 10.1136/svn-2017-000101 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | The Author(s) 2021 COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: The Author(s) 2021 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7QO 7SC 7X7 7XB 88C 88E 8AL 8FD 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AFKRA ARAPS AZQEC BBNVY BENPR BGLVJ BHPHI CCPQU DWQXO FR3 FYUFA GHDGH GNUQQ HCIFZ JQ2 K7- K9. L7M LK8 L~C L~D M0N M0S M0T M1P M7P P5Z P62 P64 PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQGLB PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM DOA |
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-021-01480-3 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Biotechnology Research Abstracts Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Health & Medical Collection ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Computing Database (Alumni Edition) Technology Research Database ProQuest SciTech Collection ProQuest Technology Collection ProQuest Natural Science Collection Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest Central UK/Ireland Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central Technology Collection Natural Science Collection ProQuest One Community College ProQuest Central Korea Engineering Research Database Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Central Student SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer Science Database ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Biological Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Computing Database ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Healthcare Administration Database Medical Database Biological Science Database Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Publicly Available Content ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China ProQuest Central Basic MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Computer Science Database ProQuest Central Student ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Computer Science Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts SciTech Premium Collection ProQuest Central China ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences Health Research Premium Collection Natural Science Collection Health & Medical Research Collection Biological Science Collection ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection ProQuest Biological Science Collection ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection ProQuest Technology Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) Biological Science Database ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Health Management (Alumni Edition) Engineering Research Database ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) Technology Collection Technology Research Database Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Natural Science Collection ProQuest Central ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection Biotechnology Research Abstracts Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace ProQuest Computing ProQuest Central Basic ProQuest Computing (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Health Management ProQuest SciTech Collection Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: DOA name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals url: https://www.doaj.org/ sourceTypes: Open Website – sequence: 3 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 5 dbid: 8FG name: ProQuest Technology Collection url: https://search.proquest.com/technologycollection1 sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Medicine |
EISSN | 1472-6947 |
EndPage | 9 |
ExternalDocumentID | oai_doaj_org_article_c732beb1e5234b96b8c5ef0fab7e7513 PMC8020544 A658544205 33820531 10_1186_s12911_021_01480_3 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GeographicLocations | China Japan |
GeographicLocations_xml | – name: China – name: Japan |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 23N 2WC 53G 5VS 6J9 6PF 7X7 88E 8FE 8FG 8FH 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AAKPC AASML AAWTL ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIWK ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADUKV AENEX AFKRA AFPKN AFRAH AHBYD AHMBA AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS AQUVI ARAPS AZQEC BAPOH BAWUL BBNVY BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BGLVJ BHPHI BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 DWQXO E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GNUQQ GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 HCIFZ HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR ITC K6V K7- KQ8 LK8 M0T M1P M48 M7P M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P P62 PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQGLB PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RNS ROL RPM RSV SMD SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7QO 7SC 7XB 8AL 8FD 8FK FR3 JQ2 K9. L7M L~C L~D M0N P64 PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS Q9U 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c607t-f4a0d736d85d57cbdd4ea550bc033238342ec8611601913d498bf3b41ced567f3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 1472-6947 |
IngestDate | Wed Aug 27 00:45:11 EDT 2025 Thu Aug 21 18:33:42 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 18:38:13 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 19:17:14 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 21:48:39 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 20:25:12 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:00:23 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:01:36 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:05:52 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:31:28 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis Electronic health records Machine learning Prediction |
Language | English |
License | Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c607t-f4a0d736d85d57cbdd4ea550bc033238342ec8611601913d498bf3b41ced567f3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.proquest.com/docview/2514327648?pq-origsite=%requestingapplication% |
PMID | 33820531 |
PQID | 2514327648 |
PQPubID | 42572 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c732beb1e5234b96b8c5ef0fab7e7513 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_8020544 proquest_miscellaneous_2509282045 proquest_journals_2514327648 gale_infotracmisc_A658544205 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A658544205 pubmed_primary_33820531 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s12911_021_01480_3 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12911_021_01480_3 springer_journals_10_1186_s12911_021_01480_3 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2021-04-05 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2021-04-05 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 04 year: 2021 text: 2021-04-05 day: 05 |
PublicationDecade | 2020 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | BMC medical informatics and decision making |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | BMC Med Inform Decis Mak |
PublicationTitleAlternate | BMC Med Inform Decis Mak |
PublicationYear | 2021 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd BMC |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd – name: BMC |
References | G Sirimarco (1480_CR1) 2013; 44 P Song (1480_CR37) 2018; 276 1480_CR13 1480_CR32 J Oh (1480_CR27) 2019; 257 1480_CR30 T Hernandez-Boussard (1480_CR41) 2020; 27 X Liu (1480_CR9) 2019; 1 AG Singal (1480_CR15) 2013; 108 D Zhang (1480_CR23) 2020; 8 M de Weerd (1480_CR2) 2010; 41 X Hu (1480_CR39) 2016; 2016 1480_CR18 HJA van Os (1480_CR11) 2018; 9 1480_CR17 RE Thornhill (1480_CR36) 2014; 21 H Zhang (1480_CR26) 2016; 2016 J Alizargar (1480_CR38) 2018; 18 SS Tworoger (1480_CR31) 2014; 32 S Džeroski (1480_CR28) 2008 X Yao (1480_CR33) 2021; 49 RC Deo (1480_CR14) 2015; 132 M Sherafatian (1480_CR19) 2019; 18 D Yu (1480_CR7) 2020; 11 1480_CR21 1480_CR22 M Byra (1480_CR5) 2019; 46 1480_CR20 F Jiang (1480_CR10) 2017; 2 H Jiang (1480_CR8) 2021; 145 AA Danielsen (1480_CR6) 2019; 140 1480_CR29 R Kop (1480_CR16) 2016; 76 W Lou (1480_CR24) 2014; 9 S Okser (1480_CR40) 2010; 6 AM Darcy (1480_CR4) 2016; 315 N Katakami (1480_CR12) 2014; 5 HC McGill Jr (1480_CR3) 2000; 72 M Abdul Muhsin Zambang (1480_CR25) 2021; 16 EP Mwanga (1480_CR35) 2019; 18 A Witteveen (1480_CR34) 2018; 38 |
References_xml | – ident: 1480_CR21 doi: 10.1109/ICSESS.2017.8342859 – volume: 46 start-page: 746 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR5 publication-title: Med Phys doi: 10.1002/mp.13361 – ident: 1480_CR30 doi: 10.1109/ICSESS.2018.8663753 – volume: 8 start-page: 220990 year: 2020 ident: 1480_CR23 publication-title: IEEE Access doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042848 – volume: 257 start-page: 623 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR27 publication-title: J Affect Disord doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.06.034 – volume: 18 start-page: 1 issue: 1 year: 2018 ident: 1480_CR38 publication-title: BMC Cardiovasc Disord doi: 10.1186/s12872-018-0752-1 – ident: 1480_CR18 doi: 10.1109/ICCCNT49239.2020.9225451 – volume: 9 start-page: 784 year: 2018 ident: 1480_CR11 publication-title: Front Neurol doi: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00784 – volume: 18 start-page: 2125 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR19 publication-title: Oncol Lett – volume: 38 start-page: 822 issue: 7 year: 2018 ident: 1480_CR34 publication-title: Med Decis Making doi: 10.1177/0272989X18790963 – volume: 315 start-page: 551 issue: 6 year: 2016 ident: 1480_CR4 publication-title: JAMA doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18421 – volume: 16 start-page: e0246044 issue: 2 year: 2021 ident: 1480_CR25 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246044 – volume: 6 start-page: e1001146 issue: 9 year: 2010 ident: 1480_CR40 publication-title: PLoS Genet doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001146 – volume: 21 start-page: 345 issue: 3 year: 2014 ident: 1480_CR36 publication-title: Acad Radiol doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.11.011 – ident: 1480_CR22 doi: 10.1109/BIBM47256.2019.8983295 – volume: 9 start-page: e86703 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 1480_CR24 publication-title: PLoS ONE doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086703 – volume: 44 start-page: 373 issue: 2 year: 2013 ident: 1480_CR1 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673129 – volume: 41 start-page: 1294 issue: 6 year: 2010 ident: 1480_CR2 publication-title: Stroke doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.581058 – ident: 1480_CR20 doi: 10.1109/ICCCT.2010.5640492 – ident: 1480_CR29 – volume: 49 start-page: 147 issue: 1 year: 2021 ident: 1480_CR33 publication-title: Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol doi: 10.1080/21691401.2021.1879823 – volume: 27 start-page: 2011 issue: 12 year: 2020 ident: 1480_CR41 publication-title: J Am Med Inform Assoc doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa088 – volume: 276 start-page: 67 year: 2018 ident: 1480_CR37 publication-title: Atherosclerosis doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.07.020 – start-page: 821 volume-title: Encyclopedia of ecology year: 2008 ident: 1480_CR28 doi: 10.1016/B978-008045405-4.00153-1 – volume: 18 start-page: 341 issue: 1 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR35 publication-title: Malar J doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2982-9 – volume: 108 start-page: 1723 issue: 11 year: 2013 ident: 1480_CR15 publication-title: Am J Gastroenterol doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.332 – volume: 132 start-page: 1920 issue: 20 year: 2015 ident: 1480_CR14 publication-title: Circulation doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.001593 – volume: 5 start-page: 3 issue: 1 year: 2014 ident: 1480_CR12 publication-title: J Diabetes Investig doi: 10.1111/jdi.12106 – ident: 1480_CR13 doi: 10.1109/IGARSS.2007.4423159 – volume: 32 start-page: 3111 issue: 28 year: 2014 ident: 1480_CR31 publication-title: J Clin Oncol doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1068 – volume: 2016 start-page: 14 issue: 1 year: 2016 ident: 1480_CR39 publication-title: EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol doi: 10.1186/s13637-016-0049-6 – volume: 1 start-page: 271 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR9 publication-title: Lancet Digit Health doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2 – ident: 1480_CR17 – volume: 2016 start-page: 4354901 year: 2016 ident: 1480_CR26 publication-title: Biomed Res Int – volume: 72 start-page: 1307s issue: 5 Suppl year: 2000 ident: 1480_CR3 publication-title: Am J Clin Nutr doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.5.1307s – volume: 11 start-page: 95 issue: 1 year: 2020 ident: 1480_CR7 publication-title: Thorac Cancer doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.13204 – volume: 76 start-page: 30 year: 2016 ident: 1480_CR16 publication-title: Comput Biol Med doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.06.019 – ident: 1480_CR32 doi: 10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235094 – volume: 145 start-page: 104326 year: 2021 ident: 1480_CR8 publication-title: Int J Med Inform doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2020.104326 – volume: 140 start-page: 147 issue: 2 year: 2019 ident: 1480_CR6 publication-title: Acta Psychiatr Scand doi: 10.1111/acps.13061 – volume: 2 start-page: 230 issue: 4 year: 2017 ident: 1480_CR10 publication-title: Stroke Vasc Neurol doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101 |
SSID | ssj0017835 |
Score | 2.346746 |
Snippet | Background
Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic... Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic progression... Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the asymptomatic... Abstract Background Screening carotid B-mode ultrasonography is a frequently used method to detect subjects with carotid atherosclerosis (CAS). Due to the... |
SourceID | doaj pubmedcentral proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Website Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 115 |
SubjectTerms | Accuracy Algorithms Analysis Arteriosclerosis Asymptomatic Asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis Bayes Theorem Bayesian analysis Carotid Artery Diseases - diagnostic imaging Carotid Artery Diseases - epidemiology Comparative studies Decision trees Diagnosis Discriminant analysis Electronic Health Records Electronic medical records Electronic records Evaluation Health Informatics Humans Identification methods Information Systems and Communication Service Ischemia Learning algorithms Machine Learning Management of Computing and Information Systems Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Model testing Patients Performance evaluation Performance prediction Prediction Predictions Regression analysis Research Article Retrospective Studies Ultrasonic imaging |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals dbid: DOA link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3Ni9UwEA-yB_EifltdJYLgQcum-a63VVwWYT25sLeQT33gvj62XdA_wf_aSdq-t11RL14KbdKQzEwyM8nkNwi9ZEG2ljJVW-pizam3tWtTqplMhMfIrKL5cvLJJ3l8yj-eibMrqb5yTNgIDzwS7sArBq24JoLHxF0rnfYiJpKsU1GJkq-WkpbMztR0fpD3M-YrMloe9KDV8lYgza4z17DyLNRQQev_fU2-opSuB0xeOzUtyujoDro9WZH4cOz9XXQjru-hmyfTOfl99BO4jzcX-T0THncJ2_7H-WboCkIrzsl6hlXAxfzremgDnqse511ZvMuMg8dbknjcyenfYov9Di0cF2ja3Ha_-o7PS1RmxFMaii-45NjpH6DTow-f3x_XU9KF2kuihjpxS4JiMmgRhPIuBB4tuDHOE8ZAvzNOo9eyacCTaxsWeKtdYo43PgYhVWIP0d66W8fHCBMPLGoSBRMzcdFSR9ukbWg8iUIxSyrUzDwwfkIkz4kxvpnimWhpRr4Z4JspfDOsQq-3_2xGPI6_1n6XWbutmbG0yweQMDNJmPmXhFXoVRYMk2c8dM_b6eICDDJjZ5lDMOIE55SICu0vasJM9cviWbTMtFL0hmaLlSrJdYVebIvznzn6bR27y1yHtOAag_VdoUejJG6HxBgUwEJaIbWQ0cWYlyXr1deCI67BVYCeVejNLM27bv2Zpk_-B02folu0zEZeE7GP9oaLy_gMrLvBPS8T-RcwyUzr priority: 102 providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals – databaseName: ProQuest Technology Collection dbid: 8FG link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV1bi9QwFA66gvgi3q2uEkHwQcu2uTStL7KK4yKsTy7sW8h1HXCn43QW9Cf4rz0nzczYFfdloJM0JD33k-Q7hLzkvukM46o0zIZSMGdK28VY8iZWIgRuFMPLycdfmqMT8flUnuaE25CPVW50YlLUvneYIz9gaNmZakT7bvmjxKpRuLuaS2hcJzdqsDTI5-3s03YXAbMam4sybXMwgG3DhCDDAFq0oH8mxihh9v-rmf8yTZePTV7aO00maXaH3M6-JD0ciX-XXAuLe-Tmcd4tv09-Aw_Q5Qqf8fPTPlIz_DpfrvuE00qxZM967mlyAvsBxoDf-UAxN0t39XHoeFeSjvmc4S011O0ww2kCqMWxh_lPep7OZgaai1Gc0VRpZ3hATmYfv344KnPphdI1lVqXUZjKK974VnqpnPVeBAPBjHUV52DluWDBtU1dQzzX1dyLrrWRW1G74GWjIn9I9hb9IjwmtHIqqDoycDSjkB2zrIut8bWrglTcVAWpNzTQLuOSY3mM7zrFJ22jR7ppoJtOdNO8IK-37yxHVI4re79H0m57IqJ2-qNfneksoNopDtxq6wCRubBdY1snQ6yisTB9WcMgr5AxNMo9TM-ZfH0BFokIWvoQXDkpBKtkQfYnPUFe3bR5w1o664tB77i7IC-2zfgmnoFbhP4C-1QdBMjggxfk0ciJ2yVxDg2gTguiJjw6WfO0ZTH_ltDEWwgYYGYFebPh5t20_v9Nn1y9iqfkFktyJspK7pO99eoiPAPvbW2fJxH9AwCIQ5U priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals dbid: C6C link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9UwEA66gvgi3q2uEkHwQYtp7vVtXVwWYX1yYd9CkiZ6wG0P2y64P2H_tZO0p2e7XsCXAz2ZlKQzk8xkMt8g9Jo1sraUqdJSF0pOvS1dHWPJZCQ8BGYVTcnJR1_k4TH_fCJOJpiclAtzNX5fafm-h_0oHeLR5PRyDWvGTXRLVEzmwKzcnyMG6QRjkxTzx36LjSfj8_--Cl_Zhq5fkbwWJ83bz8E9dHeyG_HeyOj76EZoH6DbR1Nk_CG6BH7j9Vl6Tp8adxHb_uJ0PXQZkxWn8jzDqsHZ4Ot6eAf8rnqczmHxthYOHvMi8Xh203_AFvstPjjOYLTp3f3qJz7N9zADngpPfMO5qk7_CB0ffPq6f1hOZRZKL4kaysgtaRSTjRaNUN41DQ8WHBfnCWOwozNOg9eyqsB3qyvW8Fq7yByvfGiEVJE9Rjtt14anCBOvgqoiBaMyclFTR-uobVN5EoRilhSo2vDA-AmDPJXC-GGyL6KlGflmgG8m882wAr2d-6xHBI5_Un9MrJ0pE3p2_gOEykzKaLxiIJmuCuCFc1dLp70IkUTrYPggXAV6kwTDJB2H4Xk7pSrAJBNaltkDs01wToko0O6CEnTTL5s3omWmtaE3NNmoVEmuC_Rqbk490323NnTniYbU4AyDvV2gJ6MkzlNiDBpg6SyQWsjoYs7Llnb1PSOHa3AOYGQFereR5u2w_v5Nn_0f-XN0h2a94yURu2hnODsPL8ByG9zLrLK_ABg2PFs priority: 102 providerName: Springer Nature |
Title | The prediction of asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis with electronic health records: a comparative study of six machine learning models |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12911-021-01480-3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33820531 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2514327648 https://www.proquest.com/docview/2509282045 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC8020544 https://doaj.org/article/c732beb1e5234b96b8c5ef0fab7e7513 |
Volume | 21 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjR1di9QwMNwHiC_it9VziSD4oNU2SZNWELld7jyEPeRwYfElJGlyLtxt1-0e3P0E_7WTtN215ym-BNqkYdKZyXwkM4PQS1ryQhEqYkW0jRkxKtaFczHlLmHWUiWID04eH_OjCfs8zaZbqCt31P7A-kbTzteTmizP3l7-uPoIDP8hMHzO39Ugs7yjj3jDmOWwr2yjXZBM3BtjY7Y5VfBejhBtJEjMCya6IJob5-gJqpDP_89d-zexdf1K5bVz1SCuDu-iO62eifcbwriHtuz8Pro1bk_SH6CfQB94sfTPHjW4cljVV-eLVRVyuGJfzmc1K3FQEKsa5oB2VmPvt8Wb2jm4iaPEja-nfo8VNpt84jgkr_Vz17NLfB7ubVrcFqo4xaEKT_0QTQ4Pvo6O4rYsQ2x4IlaxYyopBeVlnpWZMLosmVVg6GiTUAoaAGXEmpynKdh6RUpLVuTaUc1SY8uMC0cfoZ15NbdPEE6MsCJ1BJRQx7KCaFK4XJWpSWwmqEoilHY4kKbNWe5LZ5zJYLvkXDZ4k4A3GfAmaYRer79ZNBk7_jl66FG7HumzbYcX1fJUtswrjaBAyTq1YLUzXXCdm8y6xCkN4GcpTPLKE4b0VArgGdWGNsAifXYtuQ9qXsYYSbII7fVGAi-bfndHWrJjBUm8TksEZ3mEXqy7_Zf-ftzcVhd-TFKA8Qz6eYQeN5S4XhKl0AFbbYREj0Z7a-73zGffQ6bxHIwJgCxCbzpq3oD193_69D_AfIZuk8BsLE6yPbSzWl7Y56DerfQAbYupgDY__DRAu8OD4y8n8DTio0FwmAwCT0N7Mvz2C1l5UO8 |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3LbtQw0CpFAi6IN4ECRgJxgKiJH3GChFB5VFva7amV9ubGjl1WoptlsxX0E_gZvpEZJ9lli-itl0iJH7Iz77FnhpAXvMqKknEVl8y4WDBbxqbwPuaZT4RzvFQMg5OH-9ngUHwZydEa-d3HwuC1yp4nBkZd1RZ95JsMJTtTmcjfT7_HWDUKT1f7EhotWuy6sx9gsjXvdj4BfF8ytv354OMg7qoKxDZL1Dz2okwqxbMql5VU1lSVcCXo6cYmnIMA44I5m2dpCqZKkfJKFLnx3IjUukpmynOY9wq5KtAzDvSjRgsDL0UvSh-Yk2ebDchSdEAyNNhFDvxuRfiFGgH_SoK_ROH5a5rnzmqDCNy-RW52uivdapHtNllzkzvk2rA7nb9LfgHO0ekM3xHctPa0bM5OpvM65IWlWCJoPq5oUDrrBuaA57ih6Aumy3o8tI3NpK3_qHlLS2qXOcppSIiLczfjn_Qk3AV1tCt-cUxDZZ_mHjm8FKDcJ-uTeuIeEppY5VTqGSi2XsiCGVb4vKxSmzipeJlEJO1hoG2XBx3LcXzTwR7KM93CTQPcdICb5hF5vRgzbbOAXNj7A4J20RMzeIcP9exYdwxBW8WBOkzqJOPCFJnJrXQ-8aWB5csUJnmFiKGRz8DybNmFS8AmMWOX3gLVUQrBEhmRjZWewB_sanOPWrrjT41eUlNEni-acSTeuZu4-hT7JAUY5KDzR-RBi4mLLXEODcC-I6JWcHRlz6stk_HXkL08BwMFVhaRNz02L5f1_3_66OJdPCPXBwfDPb23s7_7mNxggeZEnMgNsj6fnbonoDnOzdNArpQcXTZ_-ANd03_I |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSBUXxJtAASMhcYCoju3YCbdSWJVHKw5U6s3ys6xEk9UmleAn8K8ZO9ndpjwkLivtemzZOzOeGdvzDULPmRO1pkzmmhqfc2p1buoQciYC4d4zLWlMTj48EgfH_MNJeXIhiz-9dl9dSQ45DRGlqel3Fy4MKl6J3Q6sVDzaozEU5hXsJFfRNR5NX7yuFfvre4R4rrFKlfljv4k5Sqj9v-_NF4zT5YeTl25Pk1Ga3UQ3Rm8S7w3sv4Wu-OY22j4c78vvoJ8gBXixjN8jA3AbsO5-nC36NiG14li0p587nNzAtoMx4HPe4Xg6izcVcvCQLYmHE53uNdbYblDDcYKojWN38-_4LL3O9HgsR3GKU62d7i46nr37sn-Qj8UXciuI7PPANXGSCVeVrpTWOMe9hnDGWMIY2HnGqbeVKAqI6OqCOV5XJjDDC-tdKWRg99BW0zb-AcLESi-LQMHVDLysqaF1qLQrLPGlZJpkqFjxQNkRmTwWyPimUoRSCTXwTQHfVOKbYhl6ue6zGHA5_kn9JrJ2TRkxtdMP7fJUjSqqrGQgr6bwEJtzUwtT2dIHErSB6ZcFDPIiCoaKmg_Ts3pMYIBFRgwttQfOXMk5JWWGdiaUoLF22rwSLTXuGJ2i0XOlUvAqQ8_WzbFnfAXX-PY80pAaQmTwwjN0f5DE9ZIYgwbYUDMkJzI6WfO0pZl_TXjiFYQMMLMMvVpJ82Zaf_9PH_4f-VO0_fntTH16f_TxEbpOkwrynJQ7aKtfnvvH4Nr15knS3l-Ol0eP |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The+prediction+of+asymptomatic+carotid+atherosclerosis+with+electronic+health+records%3A+a+comparative+study+of+six+machine+learning+models&rft.jtitle=BMC+medical+informatics+and+decision+making&rft.au=Fan%2C+Jiaxin&rft.au=Chen%2C+Mengying&rft.au=Luo%2C+Jian&rft.au=Yang%2C+Shusen&rft.date=2021-04-05&rft.issn=1472-6947&rft.eissn=1472-6947&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=115&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs12911-021-01480-3&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1472-6947&client=summon |