Feasibility and efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib

Aim Sorafenib is the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, although there is no proven therapeutic procedure following the termination of sorafenib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may be a treatment option in advanced HCC. The aim of this study was t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inHepatology research Vol. 44; no. 12; pp. 1179 - 1185
Main Authors Terashima, Takeshi, Yamashita, Tatsuya, Arai, Kuniaki, Sunagozaka, Hajime, Kitahara, Masaaki, Nakagawa, Hidetoshi, Kagaya, Takashi, Mizukoshi, Eishiro, Honda, Masao, Kaneko, Shuichi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Netherlands Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.11.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Aim Sorafenib is the standard treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, although there is no proven therapeutic procedure following the termination of sorafenib, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) may be a treatment option in advanced HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of HAIC for patients with advanced HCC as subsequent therapy. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 27 consecutive patients with advanced HCC who were treated with HAIC following sorafenib between June 2009 and December 2012 at our hospital. Cisplatin (20 mg/m2 per day) was administered via the hepatic artery for 10 min, prior to the continuous administration of 5‐fluorouracil (330 mg/m2 per day) over 24 h from days 1–5 and 8–12 and the s.c. administration of pegylated interferon α‐2b (1 μg/kg) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. A treatment cycle consisted of 28 days of drug administration followed by 14 days of rest. Results The toxicity profile showed that hematological toxicities were common, and grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were observed (51.9% and 48.1%, respectively). Five patients (18.5%) experienced device‐related complications. No unexpected adverse reactions and no treatment‐related deaths were observed. Partial response was obtained in eight patients (29.6%), and stable disease was noted in nine patients (33.3%). Median progression‐free survival and median survival time from initiation of HAIC were 4.0 and 7.6 months, respectively. Conclusions Because HAIC was well tolerated and exhibited moderate antitumor activity, it is a potentially useful treatment procedure in patients with advanced HCC even after failure of sorafenib.
Bibliography:ArticleID:HEPR12266
Figure S1. Kaplan-Meier plot of overall survival since commencement of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy according to progression pattern. Patient prognosis did not differ among intrahepatic growth (IHG) group (black line), new intrahepatic lesion (NIH) group (gray line), and new extrahepatic lesion and/or vascular invasion (NEH) group (dashed line).Table S1. Predictive marker for response to hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.
istex:643F68A8ADE16892FE537C021C3BCF0A8E0E8550
ark:/67375/WNG-T97N0339-9
ISSN:1386-6346
1872-034X
DOI:10.1111/hepr.12266