Patients', physicians', nurses', and pharmacists' preferences on the characteristics of biologic agents used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases

To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases. We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biolog...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPatient preference and adherence Vol. 12; pp. 2153 - 2168
Main Authors Scalone, Luciana, Sarzi-Puttini, Piercarlo, Sinigaglia, Luigi, Montecucco, Carlomaurizio, Giacomelli, Roberto, Lapadula, Giovanni, Olivieri, Ignazio, Giardino, Angela Maria, Cortesi, Paolo Angelo, Mantovani, Lorenzo G, Mecchia, Monica
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New Zealand Dove Medical Press Limited 01.01.2018
Dove Medical Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
Abstract To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases. We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model. In total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen. The different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources.
AbstractList To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases. We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model. In total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen. The different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources.
To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases.OBJECTIVETo estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases.We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model.SUBJECTS AND METHODSWe surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model.In total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen.RESULTSIn total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen.The different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources.CONCLUSIONThe different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources.
Objective: To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases. Subjects and methods: We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model. Results: In total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen. Conclusion: The different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources. Keywords: preferences, biologic drugs, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, decision making
Luciana Scalone,1 Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini,2 Luigi Sinigaglia,3 Carlomaurizio Montecucco,4 Roberto Giacomelli,5 Giovanni Lapadula,6 Ignazio Olivieri,7,8,† Angela Maria Giardino,9 Paolo Angelo Cortesi,1 Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani,1 Monica Mecchia9On behalf of the CARA Study Group1Centre of Research on Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, and CHARTA Foundation, Milan, Italy; 2Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, 3Rheumatology Unit, G. Pini Hospital, Milan, Italy; 4University of Pavia School of Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy; 5Rheumatology Unit School of Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy; 6Rheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy; 7Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza, Potenza, Italy; 8Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Matera, Italy; 9MSD Italy, Rome, Italy†Dr Ignazio Olivieri passed away on July 28, 2017Objective: To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases.Subjects and methods: We surveyed patients with rheumatic diseases, and rheumatologists, nurses, and pharmacists with experience in treatment with/provision of biologic drugs for these patients. Through a discrete choice experiment, participants evaluated 16 possible scenarios in which pairs of similarly efficacious treatments were described with six characteristics: 1) frequency of administration; 2) mode and place of administration; 3) manner, helpfulness, efficiency, and courtesy of health personnel; 4) frequency of reactions at the site of drug administration; 5) severity of generalized undesired/allergic reactions; and 6) additional cost. The direction and strength of preferences toward each characteristic level and the relative importance of each characteristic were estimated through a random-effects conditional logistic regression model.Results: In total, 513 patients, 110 rheumatologists, 51 nurses, and 46 pharmacists from 30 centers in Italy participated. Characteristics 3, 4, and 6 were the most important for every subgroup; 1 was least important for patients and rheumatologists, 2 was least important for pharmacists, and 2 and 5 were least important for nurses. For characteristic 2, pharmacists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a syringe; nurses preferred assisted infusion at an infusion center close to the patient's home; patients and rheumatologists preferred subcutaneous self-injection with a pen.Conclusion: The different preferences for some characteristics shown by the different groups can play an important role, together with purely clinical aspects, in the choice and consequent benefit of treatments, contributing also to a more satisfactory use of resources.Keywords: preferences, biologic drugs, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, decision making
Audience Academic
Author Giacomelli, Roberto
Scalone, Luciana
Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
Sarzi-Puttini, Piercarlo
Cortesi, Paolo Angelo
Mecchia, Monica
Sinigaglia, Luigi
Lapadula, Giovanni
Mantovani, Lorenzo G
Olivieri, Ignazio
Giardino, Angela Maria
AuthorAffiliation 6 Rheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
5 Rheumatology Unit School of Medicine, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
2 Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
7 Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza, Potenza, Italy
8 Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Matera, Italy
1 Centre of Research on Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, and CHARTA Foundation, Milan, Italy, luciana.scalone@unimib.it
4 University of Pavia School of Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
9 MSD Italy, Rome, Italy
3 Rheumatology Unit, G. Pini Hospital, Milan, Italy
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 Centre of Research on Public Health, University of Milano-Bicocca, and CHARTA Foundation, Milan, Italy, luciana.scalone@unimib.it
– name: 8 Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Matera, Italy
– name: 5 Rheumatology Unit School of Medicine, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
– name: 6 Rheumatology Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
– name: 9 MSD Italy, Rome, Italy
– name: 3 Rheumatology Unit, G. Pini Hospital, Milan, Italy
– name: 7 Rheumatology Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza, Potenza, Italy
– name: 2 Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy
– name: 4 University of Pavia School of Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Luciana
  surname: Scalone
  fullname: Scalone, Luciana
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Piercarlo
  surname: Sarzi-Puttini
  fullname: Sarzi-Puttini, Piercarlo
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Luigi
  surname: Sinigaglia
  fullname: Sinigaglia, Luigi
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Carlomaurizio
  orcidid: 0000-0001-8263-3925
  surname: Montecucco
  fullname: Montecucco, Carlomaurizio
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Roberto
  surname: Giacomelli
  fullname: Giacomelli, Roberto
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Giovanni
  orcidid: 0000-0002-8427-6092
  surname: Lapadula
  fullname: Lapadula, Giovanni
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Ignazio
  surname: Olivieri
  fullname: Olivieri, Ignazio
– sequence: 8
  givenname: Angela Maria
  surname: Giardino
  fullname: Giardino, Angela Maria
– sequence: 9
  givenname: Paolo Angelo
  orcidid: 0000-0001-5241-4473
  surname: Cortesi
  fullname: Cortesi, Paolo Angelo
– sequence: 10
  givenname: Lorenzo G
  surname: Mantovani
  fullname: Mantovani, Lorenzo G
– sequence: 11
  givenname: Monica
  surname: Mecchia
  fullname: Mecchia, Monica
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNk1uL1DAUgIusuBd98l0Kggo6Y25N2hdhWbwsLDiggm8ht06ztMmYtML-Dv-wp86szMiySB-annznOydpclochRhcUTzFaEkwE29Xq_PlF8xrVtUPihOMhVjUdfP9aG98XJzmfI0Qp5zgR8UxRQwjivFJ8WulRu_CmF--KTfdTfbGqzB_hCllNw9UsDCj0qCMz8CVm-Ral1wwLpcxlGPnSgPzyowuAeENhNtS-9jHtTelWs_6csrOln6Lj8mpcYDwDKbOTQM0YUrrs1NQ9HHxsFV9dk9277Pi24f3Xy8-La4-f7y8OL9aGI74uGhtQzij2jKHKsEr21TIVow2SMMqiVCWK9QQzSzSWOsKcUWEcFgjUVeaNPSsuNx6bVTXcpP8oNKNjMrLP4GY1lIlaKx3UtfOGioEcwyxuhVQ2VgttK0oqaAeuN5tXZtJD8DC4pLqD6SHM8F3ch1_So6bhtAKBK92ghR_TC6PcvDZuL5XwcUpS4IpIaRGlAH6fIuuFbTmQxvBaGZcnnNCMEcN_N37qKqmtMY1w0At76DgsW7wBg5a6yF-oP2vhP0KL_YSOqf6scuxn0YfQz403wvuG5_t7_XfTb491QDgLWBSzBmOqzR-VLMHevW9xEjON0fCzZG7mwM5r__JudXeRf8GOLUWLA
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s41927_023_00341_y
crossref_primary_10_2147_JAA_S358738
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12325_020_01258_5
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10067_021_05961_8
crossref_primary_10_1080_02770903_2019_1663428
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10067_019_04843_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13075_020_02391_w
crossref_primary_10_46497_ArchRheumatol_2021_8524
crossref_primary_10_1002_acr2_11151
crossref_primary_10_1016_S2665_9913_20_30342_8
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13075_021_02707_4
crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S375938
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright COPYRIGHT 2018 Dove Medical Press Limited
COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited
2018 Scalone et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2018
Copyright_xml – notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 Dove Medical Press Limited
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2020 Dove Medical Press Limited
– notice: 2018 Scalone et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited 2018
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.2147/PPA.S168458
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic





Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: DOA
  name: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1177-889X
EndPage 2168
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_b8edc3774e4048f7926cdb7bd53250b6
PMC6199235
A622160910
A583381841
30410311
10_2147_PPA_S168458
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations United Kingdom
GeographicLocations_xml – name: United Kingdom
GroupedDBID ---
0YH
123
29O
2WC
53G
5VS
7RV
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8G5
AAYXX
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AFKRA
AIAGR
ALIPV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
AZQEC
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BKEYQ
BPHCQ
BVXVI
CCPQU
CITATION
DIK
DWQXO
E3Z
EBD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GNUQQ
GROUPED_DOAJ
GUQSH
GX1
HYE
IAO
IHR
IHW
IPNFZ
ITC
KQ8
M2O
M48
MK0
M~E
NAPCQ
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PQQKQ
PROAC
RIG
RNS
RPM
TDBHL
TR2
TUS
UKHRP
VDV
NPM
PMFND
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c606t-fd92643bd4e05765d950d54390b62127ad6a092b4d0b1bb506a277e1b0785b293
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1177-889X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:30:29 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 17:54:08 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 23:43:39 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:10:21 EDT 2025
Wed Mar 19 01:47:07 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:42:38 EDT 2025
Sat Mar 08 18:47:36 EST 2025
Thu May 22 21:21:44 EDT 2025
Thu May 22 21:22:25 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:55:55 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 00:42:21 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:33 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Keywords preferences
psoriatic arthritis
biologic drugs
rheumatoid arthritis
ankylosing spondylitis
decision making
Language English
License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0
The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c606t-fd92643bd4e05765d950d54390b62127ad6a092b4d0b1bb506a277e1b0785b293
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Dr Ignazio Olivieri passed away on July 28, 2017
ORCID 0000-0001-5241-4473
0000-0001-8263-3925
0000-0002-8427-6092
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.2147/PPA.S168458
PMID 30410311
PQID 2132228034
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 16
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b8edc3774e4048f7926cdb7bd53250b6
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_6199235
proquest_miscellaneous_2132228034
gale_infotracmisc_A622160910
gale_infotracmisc_A583381841
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A622160910
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A583381841
gale_healthsolutions_A622160910
gale_healthsolutions_A583381841
pubmed_primary_30410311
crossref_citationtrail_10_2147_PPA_S168458
crossref_primary_10_2147_PPA_S168458
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-01-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-01-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 01
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-01-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace New Zealand
PublicationPlace_xml – name: New Zealand
PublicationTitle Patient preference and adherence
PublicationTitleAlternate Patient Prefer Adherence
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher Dove Medical Press Limited
Dove Medical Press
Publisher_xml – name: Dove Medical Press Limited
– name: Dove Medical Press
SSID ssj0063621
Score 2.1934385
Snippet To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic diseases. We...
Objective: To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic...
To estimate preferences in relevant treatment characteristics evaluated by different groups involved in the management of patients with rheumatic...
Luciana Scalone,1 Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini,2 Luigi Sinigaglia,3 Carlomaurizio Montecucco,4 Roberto Giacomelli,5 Giovanni Lapadula,6 Ignazio Olivieri,7,8,†...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
StartPage 2153
SubjectTerms Ankylosing spondylitis
Arthritis
biologic drugs
Decision making
Diseases
Medical personnel
Nurses
Nursing research
Original Research
Pharmacists
Physicians
preferences
Psoriasis
Psoriatic arthritis
rheumatic disease
Rheumatoid factor
Spondylitis
Surveys
Syringes
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3di9NAEF_kHsQX8dvoqSscFMR4m-xHkscqHodwUtCDvi37Fa4g6XFp_xL_YWd205Dgyb341nanSzszmf3t7sxvCDnxrGxKL01uhUVSbcdy04Yibx2yxUnZ8lj1fvFdnV-Kb2u5nrT6wpywRA-cFHdq6-AdB5ASBDhbWzWlct5W1ksOq7eNZNuw5h02UykGKwjLRWqrAjG4btapMg978pyuVstPPwpVC-zyPlmLImX_34F5sjLNsyYny9DZI_JwwI90mX73Y3IvdE_I_Yvhhvwp-b1KRKn94iMdTy3wTcrWgBem8zAST7LBxP2CXo-tRnq67SggQurmNM5029LE1rRx1GAxVk_3ffB0k8THbHUUvLkK-8gDS4fLn_4ZuTz7-vPLeT40Xsgd7Gd2eetBy4JbLwLAOSV9I5mXAF1A38gIb7wyrCmt8MwW1kqmTFlVobCAN6QFAPGcHHXbLrwk1BheBBj0SoH5XEALMl7jbAD9CpaRDwcTaDewkmNzjF8adidoLw320oO9MnIyCl8nMo7bxT6jLUcRZNCOH4Bf6cGv9F1-lZF36Ak6laOOcUAvsUwNUI4o_imhyrJQiMMysogSGCvgTzkzlDyAapB1azbXHZKTOY9nkhAN3Gyi24Yn335_cGyNQ5hh14Xtvgcl4p1bzbjIyIvk6KMCORPYDQQmr2aPwEzD85FucxW5yhWmN3P56n-Y5DV5AHC1Tgdgx-Rod7MPbwAS7uzb-PT_Ab4HXG4
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
Title Patients', physicians', nurses', and pharmacists' preferences on the characteristics of biologic agents used in the treatment of rheumatic diseases
URI https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30410311
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2132228034
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC6199235
https://doaj.org/article/b8edc3774e4048f7926cdb7bd53250b6
Volume 12
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwhV1ta9swEBZtB2Nfxt7nrss0KATG3Eq2JNsfxsjGShhkBLZA9slYL14DxeniBLrfsT-8O8sx8ZbRb0l0Fs6ddHok3T1HyKllURZZWYRaaCTVNiwsSsfD0iBbnJRl3GS9T76o8Ux8nsv5AdkW42wVWO_d2mE9qdnq6uzm56_3MOHfYRgzF8n5dDo6-8pVKmR6SO7AkpRgKYOJ6K4TFHhp7qusgEtOs7lP1Pv74d7S1DD4_-undxaqfhDlzqp08YDcb-EkHXn7PyQHrnpE7k7aC_PH5PfU86bWw7e0O8TALz54Az4UlYWW5mAbLF4P6XVXeaSmy4oCQKSmz-pMlyX15E0LQwvMzarppnaWLrx4F7yOgqtLt2loYWl7F1Q_IbOLT98-jsO2DkNoYHuzDkubAWyKtRUO0J2SNpPMSkAyTCskiC-sKlgWaWGZ5lpLpoooSRzXAD-kBjzxlBxVy8o9J7QoYu6g0SoFrsO4tEwyFqfYGyBBzgLyZmuC3LQk5Vgr4yqHzQraKwd75a29AnLaCV97bo79Yh_Qlp0IEmo3PyxXP_J2fuY6BUvGgIWdgBeDt4qUsTrRVsYAErUKyCscCbnPTu3cQj7CrDUAPYL_V0JFEVcIywIybCRwMMOfMkWbAQGqQRKuXl-3SO70edKTBOdgeh3ta955-vV2YOfYhAF3lVtualAiXsGlLBYBeeYHeqfAmAksDgKdJ70p0NNwv6VaXDbU5QqjnWN5fKs2X5B7AE1Tf9h1Qo7Wq417CfBvrQfkkH0fD5rDk0Ezzf8ACbdYyQ
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients%27%2C+physicians%27%2C+nurses%27%2C+and+pharmacists%27+preferences+on+the+characteristics+of+biologic+agents+used+in+the+treatment+of+rheumatic+diseases&rft.jtitle=Patient+preference+and+adherence&rft.au=Cortesi%2C+Paolo+Angelo&rft.au=Montecucco%2C+Carlomaurizio&rft.au=Lapadula%2C+Giovanni&rft.au=Olivieri%2C+Ignazio&rft.date=2018-01-01&rft.pub=Dove+Medical+Press+Limited&rft.issn=1177-889X&rft.eissn=1177-889X&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=2153&rft_id=info:doi/10.2147%2FPPA.S168458&rft.externalDBID=n%2Fa&rft.externalDocID=A583381841
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1177-889X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1177-889X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1177-889X&client=summon