Brain Activity Associated with the Illusion of Motion Evoked by Different Vibration Stimulation Devices: An fNIRS Study

[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain durin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 1115 - 1119
Main Authors Imai, Ryota, Nakano, Hideki, Morioka, Shu, Hayashida, Kazuki
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Society of Physical Therapy Science 01.07.2014
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0915-5287
2187-5626
DOI10.1589/jpts.26.1115

Cover

Abstract [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
AbstractList Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. Subjects: Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. Methods: The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. Conclusion: This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. Subjects: Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. Methods: The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. Conclusion: This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.
Author Hayashida, Kazuki
Imai, Ryota
Nakano, Hideki
Morioka, Shu
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  fullname: Imai, Ryota
  organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Kawachi General Hospital, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Nakano, Hideki
  organization: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Morioka, Shu
  organization: Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University: 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara 635-0832, Japan
– sequence: 1
  fullname: Hayashida, Kazuki
  organization: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Science, Kio University, Japan
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqNkstvEzEQxi1URB9w44x85ECCH-vHckAKbaGRCkgUuFpe72zjsFmntjdV_nt2mzYCJASX8Vjzm0_z2XOMDrrQAULPKZlSocvXy3VOUyanlFLxCB0xqtVESCYP0BEpqZgIptUhOk5pSQhTpNBP0CETtCCU6CN0-y5a3-GZy37j8xbPUgrO2ww1vvV5gfMC8Lxt--RDh0ODP4Y8Zueb8GNAqi0-800DEbqMv_sq2rvqVfarvt3lZ7DxDtIbPOtw82n-5Wqo9vX2KXrc2DbBs_vzBH17f_719GJy-fnD_HR2OXGSiDxRla1tY0tGFbV1reqKa8ppzZUsSisLrhvClauJBGdtIzWtwEKhpJQw-HP8BL3d6a77agW1GwaNtjXr6Fc2bk2w3vxe6fzCXIeNKSgXjJSDwMt7gRhuekjZrHxy0La2g9AnQzXRipdM_gcqtSSc0SH8ExVCsKJkYlR98auD_egPfzgAbAe4GFKK0Bjn893jD4Z8aygx46KYcVEMk2ZclKHp1R9ND7p_wS92-DJlew172MbsXQt7WI1hdyGUGyHVHnELGw10_CeOCduB
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_27_635
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1281160
crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001149
crossref_primary_10_1017_S0263574721001107
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_2560
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_29_1236
crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000000874
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_419
Cites_doi 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.06.001
10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.10.010
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.016
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4159-11.2011
10.1152/jn.00529.2007
10.1002/ana.21810
10.1093/brain/95.4.705
10.1177/1073858403259628
10.1007/BF00239377
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00311-2
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00155-1
10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01920-6
10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00980-7
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4835-05.2006
10.1093/cercor/bhn068
10.1006/nimg.2001.0905
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.124
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03683.2002
10.1097/00001756-200112040-00041
10.1038/nrn1246
10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00021-1
10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.062
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0683-09.2009
10.1152/jn.91075.2008
10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1657
10.1097/01.WCB.0000056063.25434.04
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-06134.1999
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2014 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science
2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014
Copyright_xml – notice: 2014 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science
– notice: 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
NPM
7X8
7TS
5PM
DOI 10.1589/jpts.26.1115
DatabaseName CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
Physical Education Index
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed

Physical Education Index

Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Physical Therapy
EISSN 2187-5626
EndPage 1119
ExternalDocumentID PMC4135209
25140108
10_1589_jpts_26_1115
article_jpts_26_7_26_jpts_2013_567_article_char_en
Genre Journal Article
GroupedDBID .55
07C
29L
2WC
53G
5GY
AAEJM
AAWTL
ACGFO
ADBBV
ADRAZ
AENEX
AIAGR
AJJEV
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOIJS
BAWUL
BKOMP
BMSDO
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EBS
EJD
FRP
GX1
HYE
JMI
JSF
JSH
KQ8
M48
MOJWN
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
RJT
RNS
RPM
RZJ
TKC
TR2
W2D
X7M
XSB
AAYXX
CITATION
ACRZS
NPM
7X8
7TS
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-7badafa92171add7db38131d37649a6438f037cd06ecaaf681beae47666e108c3
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 0915-5287
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:43:17 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 17:44:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 01:05:09 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 09:07:04 EDT 2025
Thu Jan 02 22:18:28 EST 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:10:43 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 04:11:59 EDT 2025
Wed Sep 03 06:29:57 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed false
IsScholarly true
Issue 7
Keywords Tendon vibration
fNIRS
Illusion of motion
Language English
License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c605t-7badafa92171add7db38131d37649a6438f037cd06ecaaf681beae47666e108c3
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1589/jpts.26.1115
PMID 25140108
PQID 1555249259
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 5
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4135209
proquest_miscellaneous_1808739269
proquest_miscellaneous_1686032160
proquest_miscellaneous_1555249259
pubmed_primary_25140108
crossref_citationtrail_10_1589_jpts_26_1115
crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_26_1115
jstage_primary_article_jpts_26_7_26_jpts_2013_567_article_char_en
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-07-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-07-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-07-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace Japan
PublicationPlace_xml – name: Japan
PublicationTitle Journal of Physical Therapy Science
PublicationTitleAlternate Journal of Physical Therapy Science
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
Publisher_xml – name: The Society of Physical Therapy Science
References 5) Naito E, Ehrsson HH, Geyer S, et al.: Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci, 1999, 19: 6134–6144.
12) Hagura N, Oouchida Y, Aramaki Y, et al.: Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex, 2009, 19: 176–186.
16) Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Kruggel F, et al.: Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 19: 555–564.
19) Hesselmann V, Zaro Weber O, Wedekind C, et al.: Age related signal decrease in functional magnetic resonance imaging during motor stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 308: 141–144.
21) Winer BJ: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1991.
22) Naito E, Roland PE, Ehrsson HH: I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 2002, 36: 979–988.
14) Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, et al.: Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage, 2001, 14: 1186–1192.
6) Casini L, Romaiguère P, Ducorps A, et al.: Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: a MEG study. Brain Res, 2006, 1121: 200–206.
13) Jasdzewski G, Strangman G, Wagner J, et al.: Differences in the hemodynamic response to event-related motor and visual paradigms as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 20: 479–488.
15) Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M: Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2001, 90: 1657–1662.
25) Roll JP, Albert F, Thyrion C, et al.: Inducing any virtual two-dimensional movement in humans by applying muscle tendon vibration. J Neurophysiol, 2009, 101: 816–823.
11) Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Albert F, et al.: Illusory movements prevent cortical disruption caused by immobilization. Neuroimage, 2012, 62: 510–519.
24) Naito E, Scheperjans F, Eickhoff SB, et al.: Human superior parietal lobule is involved in somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object. J Neurophysiol, 2008, 99: 695–703.
28) Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB: Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol, 2009, 66: 604–616.
17) Strangman G, Franceschini MA, Boas DA: Factors affecting the accuracy of near-infrared spectroscopy concentration calculations for focal changes in oxygenation parameters. Neuroimage, 2003, 18: 865–879.
3) Roll JP, Vedel JP: Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res, 1982, 47: 177–190.
9) Gay A, Parratte S, Salazard B, et al.: Proprioceptive feedback enhancement induced by vibratory stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type I: an open comparative pilot study in 11 patients. Joint Bone Spine, 2007, 74: 461–466.
23) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 2006, 26: 3783–3790.
26) Thyrion C, Roll JP: Perceptual integration of illusory and imagined kinesthetic images. J Neurosci, 2009, 29: 8483–8492.
7) Keinrath C, Wriessnegger S, Müller-Putz GR, et al.: Post-movement beta synchronization after kinesthetic illusion, active and passive movements. Int J Psychophysiol, 2006, 62: 321–327.
27) Kito T, Hashimoto T, Yoneda T, et al.: Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration. Brain Res, 2006, 1114: 75–84.
20) Riecker A, Grodd W, Klose U, et al.: Relation between regional functional MRI activation and vascular reactivity to carbon dioxide during normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003, 23: 565–573.
8) Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R, et al.: Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci, 2002, 22: 3683–3691.
4) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas. Neuroreport, 2001, 12: 3805–3809.
2) Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB: The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 1972, 95: 705–748.
1) Naito E: Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement. Neuroscientist, 2004, 10: 73–82.
10) Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, et al.: Brain activity during ankle proprioceptive stimulation predicts balance performance in young and older adults. J Neurosci, 2011, 31: 16344–16352.
18) D’Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A: Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2003, 4: 863–872.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
20
21
17020751 - Brain Res. 2006 Nov 22;1121(1):200-6
12771571 - J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 May;23(5):565-73
11299252 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62
12880787 - Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):555-64
16597731 - J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3783-90
22072686 - J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16344-52
18453537 - Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):176-86
19052107 - J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):816-23
14595398 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Nov;4(11):863-72
11726799 - Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12 (17 ):3805-9
4265060 - Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48
11479008 - Neurosci Lett. 2001 Aug 10;308(3):141-4
12467600 - Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):979-88
19938103 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):604-16
17693114 - Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Oct;74(5):461-6
6214420 - Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(2):177-90
11978844 - J Neurosci. 2002 May 1;22(9):3683-91
14987450 - Neuroscientist. 2004 Feb;10(1):73-82
12725763 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):865-79
11697950 - Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1186-92
16904786 - Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):321-7
16920087 - Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):75-84
22584228 - Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):510-9
14527608 - Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):479-88
10407049 - J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 15;19(14 ):6134-44
19571139 - J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8483-92
18003884 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):695-703
References_xml – reference: 22) Naito E, Roland PE, Ehrsson HH: I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 2002, 36: 979–988.
– reference: 19) Hesselmann V, Zaro Weber O, Wedekind C, et al.: Age related signal decrease in functional magnetic resonance imaging during motor stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 308: 141–144.
– reference: 13) Jasdzewski G, Strangman G, Wagner J, et al.: Differences in the hemodynamic response to event-related motor and visual paradigms as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 20: 479–488.
– reference: 6) Casini L, Romaiguère P, Ducorps A, et al.: Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: a MEG study. Brain Res, 2006, 1121: 200–206.
– reference: 8) Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R, et al.: Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci, 2002, 22: 3683–3691.
– reference: 12) Hagura N, Oouchida Y, Aramaki Y, et al.: Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex, 2009, 19: 176–186.
– reference: 1) Naito E: Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement. Neuroscientist, 2004, 10: 73–82.
– reference: 18) D’Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A: Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2003, 4: 863–872.
– reference: 21) Winer BJ: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1991.
– reference: 23) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 2006, 26: 3783–3790.
– reference: 27) Kito T, Hashimoto T, Yoneda T, et al.: Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration. Brain Res, 2006, 1114: 75–84.
– reference: 26) Thyrion C, Roll JP: Perceptual integration of illusory and imagined kinesthetic images. J Neurosci, 2009, 29: 8483–8492.
– reference: 17) Strangman G, Franceschini MA, Boas DA: Factors affecting the accuracy of near-infrared spectroscopy concentration calculations for focal changes in oxygenation parameters. Neuroimage, 2003, 18: 865–879.
– reference: 9) Gay A, Parratte S, Salazard B, et al.: Proprioceptive feedback enhancement induced by vibratory stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type I: an open comparative pilot study in 11 patients. Joint Bone Spine, 2007, 74: 461–466.
– reference: 10) Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, et al.: Brain activity during ankle proprioceptive stimulation predicts balance performance in young and older adults. J Neurosci, 2011, 31: 16344–16352.
– reference: 7) Keinrath C, Wriessnegger S, Müller-Putz GR, et al.: Post-movement beta synchronization after kinesthetic illusion, active and passive movements. Int J Psychophysiol, 2006, 62: 321–327.
– reference: 25) Roll JP, Albert F, Thyrion C, et al.: Inducing any virtual two-dimensional movement in humans by applying muscle tendon vibration. J Neurophysiol, 2009, 101: 816–823.
– reference: 3) Roll JP, Vedel JP: Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res, 1982, 47: 177–190.
– reference: 5) Naito E, Ehrsson HH, Geyer S, et al.: Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci, 1999, 19: 6134–6144.
– reference: 16) Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Kruggel F, et al.: Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 19: 555–564.
– reference: 2) Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB: The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 1972, 95: 705–748.
– reference: 20) Riecker A, Grodd W, Klose U, et al.: Relation between regional functional MRI activation and vascular reactivity to carbon dioxide during normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003, 23: 565–573.
– reference: 4) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas. Neuroreport, 2001, 12: 3805–3809.
– reference: 28) Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB: Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol, 2009, 66: 604–616.
– reference: 24) Naito E, Scheperjans F, Eickhoff SB, et al.: Human superior parietal lobule is involved in somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object. J Neurophysiol, 2008, 99: 695–703.
– reference: 15) Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M: Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2001, 90: 1657–1662.
– reference: 11) Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Albert F, et al.: Illusory movements prevent cortical disruption caused by immobilization. Neuroimage, 2012, 62: 510–519.
– reference: 14) Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, et al.: Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage, 2001, 14: 1186–1192.
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.06.001
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.10.010
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.016
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4159-11.2011
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1152/jn.00529.2007
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.1002/ana.21810
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1093/brain/95.4.705
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1177/1073858403259628
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1007/BF00239377
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00311-2
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00155-1
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01920-6
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00980-7
– ident: 23
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4835-05.2006
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn068
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0905
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.124
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03683.2002
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00041
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1038/nrn1246
– ident: 17
  doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00021-1
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.062
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0683-09.2009
– ident: 25
  doi: 10.1152/jn.91075.2008
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1657
– ident: 21
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000056063.25434.04
– ident: 5
  doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-06134.1999
– reference: 17020751 - Brain Res. 2006 Nov 22;1121(1):200-6
– reference: 18453537 - Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):176-86
– reference: 16904786 - Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):321-7
– reference: 11978844 - J Neurosci. 2002 May 1;22(9):3683-91
– reference: 16920087 - Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):75-84
– reference: 10407049 - J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 15;19(14 ):6134-44
– reference: 17693114 - Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Oct;74(5):461-6
– reference: 12467600 - Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):979-88
– reference: 11726799 - Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12 (17 ):3805-9
– reference: 22072686 - J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16344-52
– reference: 14527608 - Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):479-88
– reference: 4265060 - Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48
– reference: 19938103 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):604-16
– reference: 14595398 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Nov;4(11):863-72
– reference: 12771571 - J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 May;23(5):565-73
– reference: 11299252 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62
– reference: 12880787 - Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):555-64
– reference: 19571139 - J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8483-92
– reference: 16597731 - J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3783-90
– reference: 12725763 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):865-79
– reference: 22584228 - Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):510-9
– reference: 18003884 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):695-703
– reference: 11697950 - Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1186-92
– reference: 19052107 - J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):816-23
– reference: 6214420 - Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(2):177-90
– reference: 14987450 - Neuroscientist. 2004 Feb;10(1):73-82
– reference: 11479008 - Neurosci Lett. 2001 Aug 10;308(3):141-4
SSID ssj0027048
Score 1.9818671
Snippet [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not...
Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not...
[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
jstage
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 1115
SubjectTerms fNIRS
Illusion of motion
Original
Tendon vibration
Title Brain Activity Associated with the Illusion of Motion Evoked by Different Vibration Stimulation Devices: An fNIRS Study
URI https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/26/7/26_jpts-2013-567/_article/-char/en
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140108
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1555249259
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1686032160
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1808739269
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4135209
Volume 26
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
ispartofPNX Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2014, Vol.26(7), pp.1115-1119
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Nb9NAEB21hQMXymcJhWqR4IRc1vZ-uRJCAVEKEhWCRsrNWnvX0BKc0jgt_ffM2BtDqlJxiWR54jg7npn37PE8gKc6KUSGOS-yLqkiYY2IDNa9SDtZIiBIvbRtt8W-2huJD2M5XoGF2mhYwNml1I70pEYnk-1fP89fYcC_bNV7TPbi6LiZbSeKol-uwjWsSYpo2Edh_lAv3upoYXGUSL2MDi3wF7-9VJyuHyE---ovg54XOyj_Kkm7t-BmwJJs2Dn_Nqz4-g6sfworzw66gQF34ew16UAweoWBlCKYDS7xjtFtWIYYkB1OJnO6ccamFeuUfZg_nX5Hk-KcLVRUGnZK7Lrdi6nhR5D-Ys63-WaHDWtW7b___IW1U2vvwWj37cGbvSgILkQlspom0oV1trIZ0pQY8552BdbzNHaYhERmEbuYiqe6dFz50tpKIeT11guNFMjH3JTpfVirp7V_ACy12jmLaEEmXMSisk7HCWKHKpUui4UdwPPFSudlmEZOohiTnFgJ-iUnv-SJIooiB_Cstz7upnD8w27YOa23CvHXW2n66DYQ_OZS6d6EXnPDXDGAJwt_5xhq9PzE1n46n-HPSUkDFmV2hY0yiqdJrPgVNoYbjbhU4XE2uuuoP1-Em8h4uRmAXrrCegMaB768pz781o4FRzhCPU0P_-PcNuEG_n3RtR0_grXmZO4fI7hqii1YfTeOt9ro-Q3GGylg
linkProvider Scholars Portal
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain+activity+associated+with+the+illusion+of+motion+evoked+by+different+vibration+stimulation+devices%3A+An+fNIRS+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+physical+therapy+science&rft.au=Imai%2C+R&rft.au=Hayashida%2C+K&rft.au=Nakano%2C+H&rft.au=Morioka%2C+S&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589%2Fjpts.26.1115&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon