Brain Activity Associated with the Illusion of Motion Evoked by Different Vibration Stimulation Devices: An fNIRS Study
[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain durin...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of Physical Therapy Science Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 1115 - 1119 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
01.07.2014
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0915-5287 2187-5626 |
DOI | 10.1589/jpts.26.1115 |
Cover
Abstract | [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. Subjects: Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. Methods: The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. Conclusion: This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device.[Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. [Subjects] Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. [Methods] The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. [Results] Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. [Conclusion] This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not they are equally effective has not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to investigate neural activity in the brain during the illusion of motion evoked by stimulating the tendons of the wrist extensor muscles using various vibration devices. Subjects: Twelve right-handed university students with no history of nervous system disorder or orthopedic disease participated in the study. Methods: The wrist extensor tendon was stimulated using 3 different devices: 1) a vibration stimulation device (SL-0105 LP; Asahi Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan), frequency 80 Hz; 2) a handy massager (YCM-20; Yamazen Corporation, Osaka, Japan), frequency 70 Hz; and 3) a handy massager (Thrive MD-01; Thrive Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), frequency 91.7 Hz. Brain activity was recorded during stimulation by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: Increased neural activity was observed in both the premotor cortices and the parietal region in both hemispheres in all 3 cases. The level and localization of neural activity was comparable for all 3 stimulation devices used. Conclusion: This suggests that subjects experience the illusion of motion while the tendon is being stimulated using any vibration device. |
Author | Hayashida, Kazuki Imai, Ryota Nakano, Hideki Morioka, Shu |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 fullname: Imai, Ryota organization: Department of Rehabilitation, Kawachi General Hospital, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Nakano, Hideki organization: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Morioka, Shu organization: Department of Neurorehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kio University: 4-2-2 Umami-naka, Koryo-cho, Kitakatsuragi-gun, Nara 635-0832, Japan – sequence: 1 fullname: Hayashida, Kazuki organization: Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health and Science, Kio University, Japan |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140108$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqNkstvEzEQxi1URB9w44x85ECCH-vHckAKbaGRCkgUuFpe72zjsFmntjdV_nt2mzYCJASX8Vjzm0_z2XOMDrrQAULPKZlSocvXy3VOUyanlFLxCB0xqtVESCYP0BEpqZgIptUhOk5pSQhTpNBP0CETtCCU6CN0-y5a3-GZy37j8xbPUgrO2ww1vvV5gfMC8Lxt--RDh0ODP4Y8Zueb8GNAqi0-800DEbqMv_sq2rvqVfarvt3lZ7DxDtIbPOtw82n-5Wqo9vX2KXrc2DbBs_vzBH17f_719GJy-fnD_HR2OXGSiDxRla1tY0tGFbV1reqKa8ppzZUsSisLrhvClauJBGdtIzWtwEKhpJQw-HP8BL3d6a77agW1GwaNtjXr6Fc2bk2w3vxe6fzCXIeNKSgXjJSDwMt7gRhuekjZrHxy0La2g9AnQzXRipdM_gcqtSSc0SH8ExVCsKJkYlR98auD_egPfzgAbAe4GFKK0Bjn893jD4Z8aygx46KYcVEMk2ZclKHp1R9ND7p_wS92-DJlew172MbsXQt7WI1hdyGUGyHVHnELGw10_CeOCduB |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_27_635 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2023_1281160 crossref_primary_10_1519_JSC_0000000000001149 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0263574721001107 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_2560 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_29_1236 crossref_primary_10_1097_WNR_0000000000000874 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_28_419 |
Cites_doi | 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.06.001 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.10.010 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.016 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4159-11.2011 10.1152/jn.00529.2007 10.1002/ana.21810 10.1093/brain/95.4.705 10.1177/1073858403259628 10.1007/BF00239377 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00311-2 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00155-1 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01920-6 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00980-7 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4835-05.2006 10.1093/cercor/bhn068 10.1006/nimg.2001.0905 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.124 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03683.2002 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00041 10.1038/nrn1246 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00021-1 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.062 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0683-09.2009 10.1152/jn.91075.2008 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1657 10.1097/01.WCB.0000056063.25434.04 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-06134.1999 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2014 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2014 by the Society of Physical Therapy Science – notice: 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014 |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION NPM 7X8 7TS 5PM |
DOI | 10.1589/jpts.26.1115 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef PubMed MEDLINE - Academic Physical Education Index |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Physical Education Index |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Physical Therapy |
EISSN | 2187-5626 |
EndPage | 1119 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4135209 25140108 10_1589_jpts_26_1115 article_jpts_26_7_26_jpts_2013_567_article_char_en |
Genre | Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | .55 07C 29L 2WC 53G 5GY AAEJM AAWTL ACGFO ADBBV ADRAZ AENEX AIAGR AJJEV ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOIJS BAWUL BKOMP BMSDO CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EBS EJD FRP GX1 HYE JMI JSF JSH KQ8 M48 MOJWN OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT RJT RNS RPM RZJ TKC TR2 W2D X7M XSB AAYXX CITATION ACRZS NPM 7X8 7TS 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c605t-7badafa92171add7db38131d37649a6438f037cd06ecaaf681beae47666e108c3 |
IEDL.DBID | M48 |
ISSN | 0915-5287 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:43:17 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 17:44:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 01:05:09 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 09:07:04 EDT 2025 Thu Jan 02 22:18:28 EST 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:10:43 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 04:11:59 EDT 2025 Wed Sep 03 06:29:57 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | false |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 7 |
Keywords | Tendon vibration fNIRS Illusion of motion |
Language | English |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c605t-7badafa92171add7db38131d37649a6438f037cd06ecaaf681beae47666e108c3 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | http://journals.scholarsportal.info/openUrl.xqy?doi=10.1589/jpts.26.1115 |
PMID | 25140108 |
PQID | 1555249259 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 5 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4135209 proquest_miscellaneous_1808739269 proquest_miscellaneous_1686032160 proquest_miscellaneous_1555249259 pubmed_primary_25140108 crossref_citationtrail_10_1589_jpts_26_1115 crossref_primary_10_1589_jpts_26_1115 jstage_primary_article_jpts_26_7_26_jpts_2013_567_article_char_en |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-07-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-07-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2014 text: 2014-07-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | Japan |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: Japan |
PublicationTitle | Journal of Physical Therapy Science |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Journal of Physical Therapy Science |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
References | 5) Naito E, Ehrsson HH, Geyer S, et al.: Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci, 1999, 19: 6134–6144. 12) Hagura N, Oouchida Y, Aramaki Y, et al.: Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex, 2009, 19: 176–186. 16) Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Kruggel F, et al.: Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 19: 555–564. 19) Hesselmann V, Zaro Weber O, Wedekind C, et al.: Age related signal decrease in functional magnetic resonance imaging during motor stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 308: 141–144. 21) Winer BJ: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1991. 22) Naito E, Roland PE, Ehrsson HH: I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 2002, 36: 979–988. 14) Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, et al.: Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage, 2001, 14: 1186–1192. 6) Casini L, Romaiguère P, Ducorps A, et al.: Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: a MEG study. Brain Res, 2006, 1121: 200–206. 13) Jasdzewski G, Strangman G, Wagner J, et al.: Differences in the hemodynamic response to event-related motor and visual paradigms as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 20: 479–488. 15) Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M: Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2001, 90: 1657–1662. 25) Roll JP, Albert F, Thyrion C, et al.: Inducing any virtual two-dimensional movement in humans by applying muscle tendon vibration. J Neurophysiol, 2009, 101: 816–823. 11) Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Albert F, et al.: Illusory movements prevent cortical disruption caused by immobilization. Neuroimage, 2012, 62: 510–519. 24) Naito E, Scheperjans F, Eickhoff SB, et al.: Human superior parietal lobule is involved in somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object. J Neurophysiol, 2008, 99: 695–703. 28) Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB: Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol, 2009, 66: 604–616. 17) Strangman G, Franceschini MA, Boas DA: Factors affecting the accuracy of near-infrared spectroscopy concentration calculations for focal changes in oxygenation parameters. Neuroimage, 2003, 18: 865–879. 3) Roll JP, Vedel JP: Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res, 1982, 47: 177–190. 9) Gay A, Parratte S, Salazard B, et al.: Proprioceptive feedback enhancement induced by vibratory stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type I: an open comparative pilot study in 11 patients. Joint Bone Spine, 2007, 74: 461–466. 23) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 2006, 26: 3783–3790. 26) Thyrion C, Roll JP: Perceptual integration of illusory and imagined kinesthetic images. J Neurosci, 2009, 29: 8483–8492. 7) Keinrath C, Wriessnegger S, Müller-Putz GR, et al.: Post-movement beta synchronization after kinesthetic illusion, active and passive movements. Int J Psychophysiol, 2006, 62: 321–327. 27) Kito T, Hashimoto T, Yoneda T, et al.: Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration. Brain Res, 2006, 1114: 75–84. 20) Riecker A, Grodd W, Klose U, et al.: Relation between regional functional MRI activation and vascular reactivity to carbon dioxide during normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003, 23: 565–573. 8) Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R, et al.: Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci, 2002, 22: 3683–3691. 4) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas. Neuroreport, 2001, 12: 3805–3809. 2) Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB: The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 1972, 95: 705–748. 1) Naito E: Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement. Neuroscientist, 2004, 10: 73–82. 10) Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, et al.: Brain activity during ankle proprioceptive stimulation predicts balance performance in young and older adults. J Neurosci, 2011, 31: 16344–16352. 18) D’Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A: Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2003, 4: 863–872. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 20 21 17020751 - Brain Res. 2006 Nov 22;1121(1):200-6 12771571 - J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 May;23(5):565-73 11299252 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62 12880787 - Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):555-64 16597731 - J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3783-90 22072686 - J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16344-52 18453537 - Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):176-86 19052107 - J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):816-23 14595398 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Nov;4(11):863-72 11726799 - Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12 (17 ):3805-9 4265060 - Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48 11479008 - Neurosci Lett. 2001 Aug 10;308(3):141-4 12467600 - Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):979-88 19938103 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):604-16 17693114 - Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Oct;74(5):461-6 6214420 - Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(2):177-90 11978844 - J Neurosci. 2002 May 1;22(9):3683-91 14987450 - Neuroscientist. 2004 Feb;10(1):73-82 12725763 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):865-79 11697950 - Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1186-92 16904786 - Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):321-7 16920087 - Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):75-84 22584228 - Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):510-9 14527608 - Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):479-88 10407049 - J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 15;19(14 ):6134-44 19571139 - J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8483-92 18003884 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):695-703 |
References_xml | – reference: 22) Naito E, Roland PE, Ehrsson HH: I feel my hand moving: a new role of the primary motor cortex in somatic perception of limb movement. Neuron, 2002, 36: 979–988. – reference: 19) Hesselmann V, Zaro Weber O, Wedekind C, et al.: Age related signal decrease in functional magnetic resonance imaging during motor stimulation in humans. Neurosci Lett, 2001, 308: 141–144. – reference: 13) Jasdzewski G, Strangman G, Wagner J, et al.: Differences in the hemodynamic response to event-related motor and visual paradigms as measured by near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 20: 479–488. – reference: 6) Casini L, Romaiguère P, Ducorps A, et al.: Cortical correlates of illusory hand movement perception in humans: a MEG study. Brain Res, 2006, 1121: 200–206. – reference: 8) Naito E, Kochiyama T, Kitada R, et al.: Internally simulated movement sensations during motor imagery activate cortical motor areas and the cerebellum. J Neurosci, 2002, 22: 3683–3691. – reference: 12) Hagura N, Oouchida Y, Aramaki Y, et al.: Visuokinesthetic perception of hand movement is mediated by cerebro-cerebellar interaction between the left cerebellum and right parietal cortex. Cereb Cortex, 2009, 19: 176–186. – reference: 1) Naito E: Sensing limb movements in the motor cortex: how humans sense limb movement. Neuroscientist, 2004, 10: 73–82. – reference: 18) D’Esposito M, Deouell LY, Gazzaley A: Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2003, 4: 863–872. – reference: 21) Winer BJ: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1991. – reference: 23) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Somatic sensation of hand-object interactive movement is associated with activity in the left inferior parietal cortex. J Neurosci, 2006, 26: 3783–3790. – reference: 27) Kito T, Hashimoto T, Yoneda T, et al.: Sensory processing during kinesthetic aftereffect following illusory hand movement elicited by tendon vibration. Brain Res, 2006, 1114: 75–84. – reference: 26) Thyrion C, Roll JP: Perceptual integration of illusory and imagined kinesthetic images. J Neurosci, 2009, 29: 8483–8492. – reference: 17) Strangman G, Franceschini MA, Boas DA: Factors affecting the accuracy of near-infrared spectroscopy concentration calculations for focal changes in oxygenation parameters. Neuroimage, 2003, 18: 865–879. – reference: 9) Gay A, Parratte S, Salazard B, et al.: Proprioceptive feedback enhancement induced by vibratory stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome type I: an open comparative pilot study in 11 patients. Joint Bone Spine, 2007, 74: 461–466. – reference: 10) Goble DJ, Coxon JP, Van Impe A, et al.: Brain activity during ankle proprioceptive stimulation predicts balance performance in young and older adults. J Neurosci, 2011, 31: 16344–16352. – reference: 7) Keinrath C, Wriessnegger S, Müller-Putz GR, et al.: Post-movement beta synchronization after kinesthetic illusion, active and passive movements. Int J Psychophysiol, 2006, 62: 321–327. – reference: 25) Roll JP, Albert F, Thyrion C, et al.: Inducing any virtual two-dimensional movement in humans by applying muscle tendon vibration. J Neurophysiol, 2009, 101: 816–823. – reference: 3) Roll JP, Vedel JP: Kinaesthetic role of muscle afferents in man, studied by tendon vibration and microneurography. Exp Brain Res, 1982, 47: 177–190. – reference: 5) Naito E, Ehrsson HH, Geyer S, et al.: Illusory arm movements activate cortical motor areas: a positron emission tomography study. J Neurosci, 1999, 19: 6134–6144. – reference: 16) Schroeter ML, Zysset S, Kruggel F, et al.: Age dependency of the hemodynamic response as measured by functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage, 2003, 19: 555–564. – reference: 2) Goodwin GM, McCloskey DI, Matthews PB: The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents. Brain, 1972, 95: 705–748. – reference: 20) Riecker A, Grodd W, Klose U, et al.: Relation between regional functional MRI activation and vascular reactivity to carbon dioxide during normal aging. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2003, 23: 565–573. – reference: 4) Naito E, Ehrsson HH: Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas. Neuroreport, 2001, 12: 3805–3809. – reference: 28) Sharma N, Baron JC, Rowe JB: Motor imagery after stroke: relating outcome to motor network connectivity. Ann Neurol, 2009, 66: 604–616. – reference: 24) Naito E, Scheperjans F, Eickhoff SB, et al.: Human superior parietal lobule is involved in somatic perception of bimanual interaction with an external object. J Neurophysiol, 2008, 99: 695–703. – reference: 15) Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M: Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 1985, 2001, 90: 1657–1662. – reference: 11) Roll R, Kavounoudias A, Albert F, et al.: Illusory movements prevent cortical disruption caused by immobilization. Neuroimage, 2012, 62: 510–519. – reference: 14) Miyai I, Tanabe HC, Sase I, et al.: Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. Neuroimage, 2001, 14: 1186–1192. – ident: 7 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.06.001 – ident: 9 doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2006.10.010 – ident: 11 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.016 – ident: 10 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4159-11.2011 – ident: 24 doi: 10.1152/jn.00529.2007 – ident: 28 doi: 10.1002/ana.21810 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1093/brain/95.4.705 – ident: 1 doi: 10.1177/1073858403259628 – ident: 3 doi: 10.1007/BF00239377 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00311-2 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00155-1 – ident: 19 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01920-6 – ident: 22 doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00980-7 – ident: 23 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4835-05.2006 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn068 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0905 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.124 – ident: 8 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-09-03683.2002 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1097/00001756-200112040-00041 – ident: 18 doi: 10.1038/nrn1246 – ident: 17 doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00021-1 – ident: 27 doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.062 – ident: 26 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0683-09.2009 – ident: 25 doi: 10.1152/jn.91075.2008 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1152/jappl.2001.90.5.1657 – ident: 21 – ident: 20 doi: 10.1097/01.WCB.0000056063.25434.04 – ident: 5 doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-14-06134.1999 – reference: 17020751 - Brain Res. 2006 Nov 22;1121(1):200-6 – reference: 18453537 - Cereb Cortex. 2009 Jan;19(1):176-86 – reference: 16904786 - Int J Psychophysiol. 2006 Nov;62(2):321-7 – reference: 11978844 - J Neurosci. 2002 May 1;22(9):3683-91 – reference: 16920087 - Brain Res. 2006 Oct 9;1114(1):75-84 – reference: 10407049 - J Neurosci. 1999 Jul 15;19(14 ):6134-44 – reference: 17693114 - Joint Bone Spine. 2007 Oct;74(5):461-6 – reference: 12467600 - Neuron. 2002 Dec 5;36(5):979-88 – reference: 11726799 - Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 4;12 (17 ):3805-9 – reference: 22072686 - J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 9;31(45):16344-52 – reference: 14527608 - Neuroimage. 2003 Sep;20(1):479-88 – reference: 4265060 - Brain. 1972;95(4):705-48 – reference: 19938103 - Ann Neurol. 2009 Nov;66(5):604-16 – reference: 14595398 - Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Nov;4(11):863-72 – reference: 12771571 - J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2003 May;23(5):565-73 – reference: 11299252 - J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 May;90(5):1657-62 – reference: 12880787 - Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):555-64 – reference: 19571139 - J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8483-92 – reference: 16597731 - J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3783-90 – reference: 12725763 - Neuroimage. 2003 Apr;18(4):865-79 – reference: 22584228 - Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):510-9 – reference: 18003884 - J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):695-703 – reference: 11697950 - Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1186-92 – reference: 19052107 - J Neurophysiol. 2009 Feb;101(2):816-23 – reference: 6214420 - Exp Brain Res. 1982;47(2):177-90 – reference: 14987450 - Neuroscientist. 2004 Feb;10(1):73-82 – reference: 11479008 - Neurosci Lett. 2001 Aug 10;308(3):141-4 |
SSID | ssj0027048 |
Score | 1.9818671 |
Snippet | [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not... Purpose: A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not... [Purpose] A number of different stimulation devices are used in basic and clinical research studies, and their frequencies of use vary. However, whether or not... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref jstage |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 1115 |
SubjectTerms | fNIRS Illusion of motion Original Tendon vibration |
Title | Brain Activity Associated with the Illusion of Motion Evoked by Different Vibration Stimulation Devices: An fNIRS Study |
URI | https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jpts/26/7/26_jpts-2013-567/_article/-char/en https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25140108 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1555249259 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1686032160 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1808739269 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4135209 |
Volume | 26 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
ispartofPNX | Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 2014, Vol.26(7), pp.1115-1119 |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1Nb9NAEB21hQMXymcJhWqR4IRc1vZ-uRJCAVEKEhWCRsrNWnvX0BKc0jgt_ffM2BtDqlJxiWR54jg7npn37PE8gKc6KUSGOS-yLqkiYY2IDNa9SDtZIiBIvbRtt8W-2huJD2M5XoGF2mhYwNml1I70pEYnk-1fP89fYcC_bNV7TPbi6LiZbSeKol-uwjWsSYpo2Edh_lAv3upoYXGUSL2MDi3wF7-9VJyuHyE---ovg54XOyj_Kkm7t-BmwJJs2Dn_Nqz4-g6sfworzw66gQF34ew16UAweoWBlCKYDS7xjtFtWIYYkB1OJnO6ccamFeuUfZg_nX5Hk-KcLVRUGnZK7Lrdi6nhR5D-Ys63-WaHDWtW7b___IW1U2vvwWj37cGbvSgILkQlspom0oV1trIZ0pQY8552BdbzNHaYhERmEbuYiqe6dFz50tpKIeT11guNFMjH3JTpfVirp7V_ACy12jmLaEEmXMSisk7HCWKHKpUui4UdwPPFSudlmEZOohiTnFgJ-iUnv-SJIooiB_Cstz7upnD8w27YOa23CvHXW2n66DYQ_OZS6d6EXnPDXDGAJwt_5xhq9PzE1n46n-HPSUkDFmV2hY0yiqdJrPgVNoYbjbhU4XE2uuuoP1-Em8h4uRmAXrrCegMaB768pz781o4FRzhCPU0P_-PcNuEG_n3RtR0_grXmZO4fI7hqii1YfTeOt9ro-Q3GGylg |
linkProvider | Scholars Portal |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Brain+activity+associated+with+the+illusion+of+motion+evoked+by+different+vibration+stimulation+devices%3A+An+fNIRS+study&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+physical+therapy+science&rft.au=Imai%2C+R&rft.au=Hayashida%2C+K&rft.au=Nakano%2C+H&rft.au=Morioka%2C+S&rft.date=2014-07-01&rft.issn=0915-5287&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1589%2Fjpts.26.1115&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0915-5287&client=summon |