Validity and reliability of the simplified Chinese patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events

• Published in: BMC cancer Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
• Main Authors: Yang, Shan-Shan, Chen, Lei, Liu, Ying, Lu, Hai-Jun, Huang, Bo-Jie, Lin, Ai-Hua, Sun, Ying, Ma, Jun, Xie, Fang-Yun, Mao, Yan-Ping
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London BioMed Central Ltd 27.07.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Cancer; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Chinese; Evaluation; Factor analysis; Hospitals; Methods; Outcome and process assessment (Health Care); Patient-reported outcomes; Patients; PRO-CTCAE; Quality of life; Quantitative psychology; Questionnaires; Reliability; Terminology; Validity; China

Background The psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) have not been assessed. Therefore, we aimed to assess its validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Patients and method...