Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features

Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of neural engineering Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 16009
Main Authors McFarland, Dennis J, Parvaz, Muhammad A, Sarnacki, William A, Goldstein, Rita Z, Wolpaw, Jonathan R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England IOP Publishing 01.02.2017
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1741-2560
1741-2552
1741-2552
DOI10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. Approach. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Main results. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. Significance. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.
AbstractList Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.
Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. Approach. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Main results. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. Significance. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.
Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22–68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 days over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.
Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli.OBJECTIVEEmotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli.To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings.APPROACHTo assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings.Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization.MAIN RESULTSModels using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization.The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.SIGNIFICANCEThe results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.
Author Parvaz, Muhammad A
Wolpaw, Jonathan R
Goldstein, Rita Z
McFarland, Dennis J
Sarnacki, William A
AuthorAffiliation 1 National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201-0509
2 Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 1 National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201-0509
– name: 2 Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Dennis J
  surname: McFarland
  fullname: McFarland, Dennis J
  email: dennis.mcfarland@health.ny.gov
  organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Muhammad A
  surname: Parvaz
  fullname: Parvaz, Muhammad A
  organization: Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA
– sequence: 3
  givenname: William A
  surname: Sarnacki
  fullname: Sarnacki, William A
  organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Rita Z
  surname: Goldstein
  fullname: Goldstein, Rita Z
  organization: Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jonathan R
  surname: Wolpaw
  fullname: Wolpaw, Jonathan R
  organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNqFkV1LHTEQhkOx1I_2J1T2zt4cT2bzjSCIHLUgtBftdchmE81hz2ZNdgX_fbMePdhS8CbJTJ53Zpj3EO31sXcIfQV8CljKJQgKi5qxegl0CUsMHGP1AR3s8nu7N8f76DDnNcYEhMKf0H4tFKFC8AN09TO5NtgxxL6KvspTs3YlenRVMmPo7_KcdZs4A6arhoJOyeWqeapWq-vKO_Mcf0Yfvemy-_JyH6HfV6tflzeL2x_X3y8vbheWYzqWUzJJia-Fh9a2Crg3QhphG-5rLC2tnccAjeKNIp4Sq5w1hLSeYmCMKXKEzrd1h6nZuNa6fkym00MKG5OedDRB__3Th3t9Fx81o4IrRkuBby8FUnyYXB71JmTrus70Lk5Zg6RCqhokL-jx2167Jq_LKwDbAjbFnJPzOwSwnk3SswF6NkMD1aC3JhXd2T86G0Yzb7iMHLp31bBVhzjodZxS8SW_qzn5j2bdu7eUHlpP_gCcG7Ls
CODEN JNEIEZ
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2019_00117
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_abb580
crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci10100669
crossref_primary_10_1063_1_5113844
crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2017_1307625
crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_2980893
crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219622019500238
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucli_2023_102936
crossref_primary_10_3390_app11041920
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11571_021_09692_z
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13673_017_0104_7
crossref_primary_10_1007_s11045_022_00821_3
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_938708
crossref_primary_10_1109_TAFFC_2019_2901733
crossref_primary_10_1007_s12559_021_09936_4
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2018_00225
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2020_112486
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2019_05_024
crossref_primary_10_3390_life12030374
crossref_primary_10_3390_s23125461
crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00674
crossref_primary_10_1134_S1064226922100072
Cites_doi 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007
10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B
10.3389/fnins.2014.00244
10.3758/s13415-012-0107-9
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.022
10.1080/02699930802204677
10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006
10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00151-0
10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00093-2
10.1037/a0030811
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.12.003
10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008
10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01703-7
10.1111/1469-8986.3740515
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.060
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010
10.1093/scan/nss130
10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.015
10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07663.x
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002
10.1006/jmca.1993.1030
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.017
10.1371/journal.pone.0113375
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00192
10.3390/s140813361
10.1002/bimj.201400226
10.1097/00004691-199104000-00007
10.1002/ana.24390
10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7
10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.046
10.1109/86.847816
10.1007/s11571-013-9255-z
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.005
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057
10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2
10.1109/TBME.2004.827072
10.1007/s10548-009-0081-x
10.1080/2326263X.2014.912885
10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.5
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd
Copyright_xml – notice: 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd
DBID AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
7X8
5PM
DOI 10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009
DatabaseName CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList MEDLINE


MEDLINE - Academic
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 2
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Anatomy & Physiology
DocumentTitleAlternate Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features
EISSN 1741-2552
EndPage 016009
ExternalDocumentID PMC5476954
27934776
10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009
jneaa4a0c
Genre Journal Article
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: National Institutes of Health
  grantid: 1P41EB018783; EB00856; DA034954; DA033088
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
– fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS
  grantid: P41 EB018783
– fundername: NIDA NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 DA041528
– fundername: NIDA NIH HHS
  grantid: R21 DA034954
– fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS
  grantid: R01 EB000856
– fundername: NIDA NIH HHS
  grantid: F32 DA033088
GroupedDBID ---
1JI
4.4
53G
5B3
5GY
5VS
5ZH
7.M
7.Q
AAGCD
AAJIO
AAJKP
AALHV
AATNI
ABHWH
ABJNI
ABQJV
ABVAM
ACAFW
ACGFS
ACHIP
AEFHF
AENEX
AFYNE
AKPSB
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AOAED
ASPBG
ATQHT
AVWKF
AZFZN
CEBXE
CJUJL
CRLBU
CS3
DU5
EBS
EDWGO
EJD
EMSAF
EPQRW
EQZZN
F5P
HAK
IHE
IJHAN
IOP
IZVLO
KOT
LAP
M45
N5L
N9A
NT-
NT.
P2P
PJBAE
RIN
RO9
ROL
RPA
SY9
W28
XPP
AAYXX
ADEQX
CITATION
02O
1WK
ACARI
AERVB
AHSEE
ARNYC
BBWZM
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
FEDTE
HVGLF
JCGBZ
NPM
Q02
RNS
S3P
7X8
5PM
AEINN
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-c685843f27f1dcd916fa78a7cb6f208c42ef011b96b93f43c9eca33df40155593
IEDL.DBID IOP
ISSN 1741-2560
1741-2552
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 13:38:56 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 11 13:17:58 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:03:55 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 01:58:37 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:20:36 EDT 2025
Fri Jan 08 09:41:23 EST 2021
Wed Aug 21 03:33:55 EDT 2024
IsDoiOpenAccess false
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Language English
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c604t-c685843f27f1dcd916fa78a7cb6f208c42ef011b96b93f43c9eca33df40155593
Notes JNE-101391.R1
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
OpenAccessLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5476954
PMID 27934776
PQID 1847892186
PQPubID 23479
PageCount 9
ParticipantIDs pubmed_primary_27934776
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5476954
crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009
proquest_miscellaneous_1847892186
iop_journals_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009
crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2017-02-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2017-02-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 02
  year: 2017
  text: 2017-02-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace England
PublicationPlace_xml – name: England
PublicationTitle Journal of neural engineering
PublicationTitleAbbrev JNE
PublicationTitleAlternate J. Neural Eng
PublicationYear 2017
Publisher IOP Publishing
Publisher_xml – name: IOP Publishing
References 22
44
24
25
26
27
28
29
Zilverstand A (45)
Wolpaw J R (43) 2012
Schalk G (34) 2014
30
31
10
32
11
33
12
13
35
14
36
15
37
16
38
39
18
Daly J J (5) 2012
Lang P J (17) 1999
19
McFarland D J (23) 2012
1
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
40
41
20
42
21
References_xml – ident: 25
  doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007
– ident: 42
  doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B
– ident: 45
  publication-title: Neuroimage
– ident: 11
  doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00244
– ident: 28
  doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0107-9
– ident: 2
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.022
– start-page: 351
  year: 2012
  ident: 5
  publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice
– ident: 21
  doi: 10.1080/02699930802204677
– ident: 26
  doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006
– ident: 27
  doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00151-0
– year: 2014
  ident: 34
  publication-title: A Practical Guide to Brain-Computer Interfacing With Bci2000: General Purpose Software for Brain-Computer Interface Research, Data Acquisition, Stimulus Presentation, and Brain Monitoring
– ident: 8
  doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00093-2
– ident: 16
  doi: 10.1037/a0030811
– ident: 12
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.12.003
– ident: 41
  doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008
– year: 1999
  ident: 17
  publication-title: Int. Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings
– start-page: 147
  year: 2012
  ident: 23
  publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice
– ident: 1
  doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01703-7
– ident: 9
  doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3740515
– ident: 20
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.060
– ident: 32
  doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010
– ident: 7
  doi: 10.1093/scan/nss130
– ident: 22
  doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.015
– ident: 6
  doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07663.x
– start-page: 3
  year: 2012
  ident: 43
  publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice
– ident: 3
  doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002
– ident: 29
  doi: 10.1006/jmca.1993.1030
– ident: 44
  doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.017
– ident: 10
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113375
– ident: 37
  doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00192
– ident: 19
  doi: 10.3390/s140813361
– ident: 40
  doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400226
– ident: 36
  doi: 10.1097/00004691-199104000-00007
– ident: 30
  doi: 10.1002/ana.24390
– ident: 4
  doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7
– ident: 38
  doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.046
– ident: 15
  doi: 10.1109/86.847816
– ident: 14
  doi: 10.1007/s11571-013-9255-z
– ident: 18
  doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.005
– ident: 13
  doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057
– ident: 24
  doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2
– ident: 33
  doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072
– ident: 31
  doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0081-x
– ident: 39
  doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2014.912885
– ident: 35
  doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.5
SSID ssj0031790
Score 2.3003192
Snippet Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new...
Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to...
SourceID pubmedcentral
proquest
pubmed
crossref
iop
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 16009
SubjectTerms Adult
Aged
Algorithms
Arousal - physiology
Cerebral Cortex - physiology
EEG
Electroencephalography - methods
emotion
Emotions - physiology
Feasibility Studies
Humans
Middle Aged
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
Photic Stimulation - methods
rehabilitation
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Visual Perception - physiology
Title Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features
URI https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934776
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1847892186
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5476954
Volume 14
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT-MwELZYuOxleS1LeclIiANS2iZxEvuIUAtC4nEAiZsVv6DsklakPcCvZyZOqhaB0IpLFMUP-TEef87MfCbkIAqdCjOlA4MMhCwXKoBjkAg0CFNiIqu4w9jhi8v07Jad3yV3M1H8g-GoVv1tePVEwX4Ia4c43gEMHQaAhKNOyDphBynSMIJvKeaw12AI39V1o4tj5J_yIZFYJO02MTyfVTO3O_2AFnwEPN_7T85sSP1lkjdd8X4of9uTsWrr13csj9_p6wr5VaNVeuzzr5IFW6yR9eMCTupPL_SQVv6j1Y_5ddK_fkajD040HTpaTtSjV6YUhay4L_Gr9bcGQZ2jQWW8KKl6ob3eKXW2ohgtf5Pbfu_m5Cyob2kIdNplY3hyADGxizIXGm0Abro843mmVeqiLtcssg6UiBKpErFjsRZW53FsHEO4loh4gywWw8JuEqqMyZlCG7XgjEEt2jLBtDICPV1N3iKsmR2pawpzvEnjn6xM6ZxLHC-J4wVHGhlKP14t0p4WG3kOj68KHMGEyHo1l19lpnOZHws7myxHxrXIfiNEElYvmmTywg4nUDOAAy7wXrAW-eOFatrECFQnyzJIyebEbZoBmcHnU4rBQ8UQnrAsFQnb-p9-bJOfEUKWyiN9hyyOnyd2FwDXWO1Va-oNWscbzg
linkProvider IOP Publishing
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB61RUJcoFCgy9NIiANSNpvESexj1e5SXmUPVOrNil-0BbKrZvdQfj0zcbLqVqAKcYmi-CE_xuPPmZnPAK_TxOuk1CayxEDIK6kjPAbJyKAw5TZ1WniKHf58VBwe8w8n-ckGHKxiYWbzTvUP8TUQBYch7BziRIwYOokQCadxwuMkJoq0kYzn1m_CrTwrsjaM78u018cZcVCFsEgqVoz6OJ6_VbW2Q21iK_4EPq_7UF7ZlCb3wPXdCb4o34fLhR6aX9eYHv-3v9twt0OtbC-UuQ8brn4AO3s1nth_XrI3rPUjbX_Q78BkekHGH5pwNvOsWerzoFQZCVv9raGvLtwehHXOz1ojRsP0JRuP3zHvWqrR5iEcT8Zf9w-j7raGyBQjvsCnQDCT-bT0iTUWYaevSlGVRhc-HQnDU-dRmWhZaJl5nhnpTJVl1nOCbbnMHsFWPavdLjBtbcU12aql4BxrMY5LbrSV5PFqqwHwfoaU6ajM6UaNH6o1qQuhaMwUjRkebVSiwpgNYLgqNg9cHjcVeIuTorpV3dyUma1lPq_d1WSFEzaAV70gKVzFZJqpajdbYs0IEoSk-8EG8DgI1qqJKapQXpaYUq6J3CoDMYSvp9Rnpy1TeM7LQub8yb_04yXcnh5M1Kf3Rx-fwp2UUEzrpP4MthYXS_ccMdhCv2iX2G8MiyEy
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction+of+subjective+ratings+of+emotional+pictures+by+EEG+features&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neural+engineering&rft.au=McFarland%2C+Dennis+J&rft.au=Parvaz%2C+Muhammad+A&rft.au=Sarnacki%2C+William+A&rft.au=Goldstein%2C+Rita+Z&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.issn=1741-2552&rft.eissn=1741-2552&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=016009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1741-2552%2F14%2F1%2F016009&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon