Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features
Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on s...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of neural engineering Vol. 14; no. 1; p. 16009 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
IOP Publishing
01.02.2017
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1741-2560 1741-2552 1741-2552 |
DOI | 10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. Approach. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Main results. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. Significance. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli.
To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings.
Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization.
The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions. Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. Approach. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Main results. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. Significance. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli. To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22–68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 days over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings. Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization. The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli.OBJECTIVEEmotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to facilitating therapeutic self-regulation of emotions. One possible BCI method would be to provide stimulus-specific feedback based on subject-specific electroencephalographic (EEG) responses to emotion-eliciting stimuli.To assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings.APPROACHTo assess the feasibility of this approach, we studied the relationships between emotional valence/arousal and three EEG features: amplitude of alpha activity over frontal cortex; amplitude of theta activity over frontal midline cortex; and the late positive potential over central and posterior mid-line areas. For each feature, we evaluated its ability to predict emotional valence/arousal on both an individual and a group basis. Twenty healthy participants (9 men, 11 women; ages 22-68) rated each of 192 pictures from the IAPS collection in terms of valence and arousal twice (96 pictures on each of 4 d over 2 weeks). EEG was collected simultaneously and used to develop models based on canonical correlation to predict subject-specific single-trial ratings. Separate models were evaluated for the three EEG features: frontal alpha activity; frontal midline theta; and the late positive potential. In each case, these features were used to simultaneously predict both the normed ratings and the subject-specific ratings.Models using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization.MAIN RESULTSModels using each of the three EEG features with data from individual subjects were generally successful at predicting subjective ratings on training data, but generalization to test data was less successful. Sparse models performed better than models without regularization.The results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions.SIGNIFICANCEThe results suggest that the frontal midline theta is a better candidate than frontal alpha activity or the late positive potential for use in a BCI-based paradigm designed to modify emotional reactions. |
Author | Parvaz, Muhammad A Wolpaw, Jonathan R Goldstein, Rita Z McFarland, Dennis J Sarnacki, William A |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201-0509 2 Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 1 National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201-0509 – name: 2 Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Dennis J surname: McFarland fullname: McFarland, Dennis J email: dennis.mcfarland@health.ny.gov organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA – sequence: 2 givenname: Muhammad A surname: Parvaz fullname: Parvaz, Muhammad A organization: Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA – sequence: 3 givenname: William A surname: Sarnacki fullname: Sarnacki, William A organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA – sequence: 4 givenname: Rita Z surname: Goldstein fullname: Goldstein, Rita Z organization: Departments of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574, USA – sequence: 5 givenname: Jonathan R surname: Wolpaw fullname: Wolpaw, Jonathan R organization: National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12201-0509, USA |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934776$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNqFkV1LHTEQhkOx1I_2J1T2zt4cT2bzjSCIHLUgtBftdchmE81hz2ZNdgX_fbMePdhS8CbJTJ53Zpj3EO31sXcIfQV8CljKJQgKi5qxegl0CUsMHGP1AR3s8nu7N8f76DDnNcYEhMKf0H4tFKFC8AN09TO5NtgxxL6KvspTs3YlenRVMmPo7_KcdZs4A6arhoJOyeWqeapWq-vKO_Mcf0Yfvemy-_JyH6HfV6tflzeL2x_X3y8vbheWYzqWUzJJia-Fh9a2Crg3QhphG-5rLC2tnccAjeKNIp4Sq5w1hLSeYmCMKXKEzrd1h6nZuNa6fkym00MKG5OedDRB__3Th3t9Fx81o4IrRkuBby8FUnyYXB71JmTrus70Lk5Zg6RCqhokL-jx2167Jq_LKwDbAjbFnJPzOwSwnk3SswF6NkMD1aC3JhXd2T86G0Yzb7iMHLp31bBVhzjodZxS8SW_qzn5j2bdu7eUHlpP_gCcG7Ls |
CODEN | JNEIEZ |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2019_00117 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_abb580 crossref_primary_10_3390_brainsci10100669 crossref_primary_10_1063_1_5113844 crossref_primary_10_1080_2326263X_2017_1307625 crossref_primary_10_1109_ACCESS_2020_2980893 crossref_primary_10_1142_S0219622019500238 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_neucli_2023_102936 crossref_primary_10_3390_app11041920 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11571_021_09692_z crossref_primary_10_1186_s13673_017_0104_7 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11045_022_00821_3 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnhum_2022_938708 crossref_primary_10_1109_TAFFC_2019_2901733 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12559_021_09936_4 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnbeh_2018_00225 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_bbr_2020_112486 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_compbiomed_2019_05_024 crossref_primary_10_3390_life12030374 crossref_primary_10_3390_s23125461 crossref_primary_10_3389_fnins_2017_00674 crossref_primary_10_1134_S1064226922100072 |
Cites_doi | 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B 10.3389/fnins.2014.00244 10.3758/s13415-012-0107-9 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.022 10.1080/02699930802204677 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00151-0 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00093-2 10.1037/a0030811 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.12.003 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01703-7 10.1111/1469-8986.3740515 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.060 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010 10.1093/scan/nss130 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.015 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07663.x 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002 10.1006/jmca.1993.1030 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.017 10.1371/journal.pone.0113375 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00192 10.3390/s140813361 10.1002/bimj.201400226 10.1097/00004691-199104000-00007 10.1002/ana.24390 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.046 10.1109/86.847816 10.1007/s11571-013-9255-z 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.005 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072 10.1007/s10548-009-0081-x 10.1080/2326263X.2014.912885 10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.5 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd |
Copyright_xml | – notice: 2016 IOP Publishing Ltd |
DBID | AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009 |
DatabaseName | CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE MEDLINE - Academic |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Anatomy & Physiology |
DocumentTitleAlternate | Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features |
EISSN | 1741-2552 |
EndPage | 016009 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC5476954 27934776 10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009 jneaa4a0c |
Genre | Journal Article |
GrantInformation_xml | – fundername: National Institutes of Health grantid: 1P41EB018783; EB00856; DA034954; DA033088 funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: P41 EB018783 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: R01 DA041528 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: R21 DA034954 – fundername: NIBIB NIH HHS grantid: R01 EB000856 – fundername: NIDA NIH HHS grantid: F32 DA033088 |
GroupedDBID | --- 1JI 4.4 53G 5B3 5GY 5VS 5ZH 7.M 7.Q AAGCD AAJIO AAJKP AALHV AATNI ABHWH ABJNI ABQJV ABVAM ACAFW ACGFS ACHIP AEFHF AENEX AFYNE AKPSB ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AOAED ASPBG ATQHT AVWKF AZFZN CEBXE CJUJL CRLBU CS3 DU5 EBS EDWGO EJD EMSAF EPQRW EQZZN F5P HAK IHE IJHAN IOP IZVLO KOT LAP M45 N5L N9A NT- NT. P2P PJBAE RIN RO9 ROL RPA SY9 W28 XPP AAYXX ADEQX CITATION 02O 1WK ACARI AERVB AHSEE ARNYC BBWZM CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF FEDTE HVGLF JCGBZ NPM Q02 RNS S3P 7X8 5PM AEINN |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-c685843f27f1dcd916fa78a7cb6f208c42ef011b96b93f43c9eca33df40155593 |
IEDL.DBID | IOP |
ISSN | 1741-2560 1741-2552 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 13:38:56 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 13:17:58 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:03:55 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 01:58:37 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:20:36 EDT 2025 Fri Jan 08 09:41:23 EST 2021 Wed Aug 21 03:33:55 EDT 2024 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c604t-c685843f27f1dcd916fa78a7cb6f208c42ef011b96b93f43c9eca33df40155593 |
Notes | JNE-101391.R1 ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
OpenAccessLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/5476954 |
PMID | 27934776 |
PQID | 1847892186 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmed_primary_27934776 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5476954 crossref_primary_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009 proquest_miscellaneous_1847892186 iop_journals_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009 crossref_citationtrail_10_1088_1741_2552_14_1_016009 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2017-02-01 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2017-02-01 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2017 text: 2017-02-01 day: 01 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Journal of neural engineering |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | JNE |
PublicationTitleAlternate | J. Neural Eng |
PublicationYear | 2017 |
Publisher | IOP Publishing |
Publisher_xml | – name: IOP Publishing |
References | 22 44 24 25 26 27 28 29 Zilverstand A (45) Wolpaw J R (43) 2012 Schalk G (34) 2014 30 31 10 32 11 33 12 13 35 14 36 15 37 16 38 39 18 Daly J J (5) 2012 Lang P J (17) 1999 19 McFarland D J (23) 2012 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 40 41 20 42 21 |
References_xml | – ident: 25 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/7/3/036007 – ident: 42 doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(91)90040-B – ident: 45 publication-title: Neuroimage – ident: 11 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00244 – ident: 28 doi: 10.3758/s13415-012-0107-9 – ident: 2 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.022 – start-page: 351 year: 2012 ident: 5 publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice – ident: 21 doi: 10.1080/02699930802204677 – ident: 26 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/5/2/006 – ident: 27 doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00151-0 – year: 2014 ident: 34 publication-title: A Practical Guide to Brain-Computer Interfacing With Bci2000: General Purpose Software for Brain-Computer Interface Research, Data Acquisition, Stimulus Presentation, and Brain Monitoring – ident: 8 doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00093-2 – ident: 16 doi: 10.1037/a0030811 – ident: 12 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2006.12.003 – ident: 41 doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008 – year: 1999 ident: 17 publication-title: Int. Affective Picture System (IAPS): Technical Manual and Affective Ratings – start-page: 147 year: 2012 ident: 23 publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice – ident: 1 doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(01)01703-7 – ident: 9 doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.3740515 – ident: 20 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.060 – ident: 32 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.04.010 – ident: 7 doi: 10.1093/scan/nss130 – ident: 22 doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.01.015 – ident: 6 doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07663.x – start-page: 3 year: 2012 ident: 43 publication-title: Brain-Computer Interfaces: Principles and Practice – ident: 3 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.002 – ident: 29 doi: 10.1006/jmca.1993.1030 – ident: 44 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2013.10.017 – ident: 10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113375 – ident: 37 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00192 – ident: 19 doi: 10.3390/s140813361 – ident: 40 doi: 10.1002/bimj.201400226 – ident: 36 doi: 10.1097/00004691-199104000-00007 – ident: 30 doi: 10.1002/ana.24390 – ident: 4 doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00044-7 – ident: 38 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2013.06.046 – ident: 15 doi: 10.1109/86.847816 – ident: 14 doi: 10.1007/s11571-013-9255-z – ident: 18 doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.005 – ident: 13 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.09.057 – ident: 24 doi: 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2 – ident: 33 doi: 10.1109/TBME.2004.827072 – ident: 31 doi: 10.1007/s10548-009-0081-x – ident: 39 doi: 10.1080/2326263X.2014.912885 – ident: 35 doi: 10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.5 |
SSID | ssj0031790 |
Score | 2.3003192 |
Snippet | Objective. Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new... Emotion dysregulation is an important aspect of many psychiatric disorders. Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology could be a powerful new approach to... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref iop |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 16009 |
SubjectTerms | Adult Aged Algorithms Arousal - physiology Cerebral Cortex - physiology EEG Electroencephalography - methods emotion Emotions - physiology Feasibility Studies Humans Middle Aged Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Photic Stimulation - methods rehabilitation Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Visual Perception - physiology |
Title | Prediction of subjective ratings of emotional pictures by EEG features |
URI | https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1741-2552/14/1/016009 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27934776 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1847892186 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5476954 |
Volume | 14 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1LT-MwELZYuOxleS1LeclIiANS2iZxEvuIUAtC4nEAiZsVv6DsklakPcCvZyZOqhaB0IpLFMUP-TEef87MfCbkIAqdCjOlA4MMhCwXKoBjkAg0CFNiIqu4w9jhi8v07Jad3yV3M1H8g-GoVv1tePVEwX4Ia4c43gEMHQaAhKNOyDphBynSMIJvKeaw12AI39V1o4tj5J_yIZFYJO02MTyfVTO3O_2AFnwEPN_7T85sSP1lkjdd8X4of9uTsWrr13csj9_p6wr5VaNVeuzzr5IFW6yR9eMCTupPL_SQVv6j1Y_5ddK_fkajD040HTpaTtSjV6YUhay4L_Gr9bcGQZ2jQWW8KKl6ob3eKXW2ohgtf5Pbfu_m5Cyob2kIdNplY3hyADGxizIXGm0Abro843mmVeqiLtcssg6UiBKpErFjsRZW53FsHEO4loh4gywWw8JuEqqMyZlCG7XgjEEt2jLBtDICPV1N3iKsmR2pawpzvEnjn6xM6ZxLHC-J4wVHGhlKP14t0p4WG3kOj68KHMGEyHo1l19lpnOZHws7myxHxrXIfiNEElYvmmTywg4nUDOAAy7wXrAW-eOFatrECFQnyzJIyebEbZoBmcHnU4rBQ8UQnrAsFQnb-p9-bJOfEUKWyiN9hyyOnyd2FwDXWO1Va-oNWscbzg |
linkProvider | IOP Publishing |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwpV1Lb9QwEB61RUJcoFCgy9NIiANSNpvESexj1e5SXmUPVOrNil-0BbKrZvdQfj0zcbLqVqAKcYmi-CE_xuPPmZnPAK_TxOuk1CayxEDIK6kjPAbJyKAw5TZ1WniKHf58VBwe8w8n-ckGHKxiYWbzTvUP8TUQBYch7BziRIwYOokQCadxwuMkJoq0kYzn1m_CrTwrsjaM78u018cZcVCFsEgqVoz6OJ6_VbW2Q21iK_4EPq_7UF7ZlCb3wPXdCb4o34fLhR6aX9eYHv-3v9twt0OtbC-UuQ8brn4AO3s1nth_XrI3rPUjbX_Q78BkekHGH5pwNvOsWerzoFQZCVv9raGvLtwehHXOz1ojRsP0JRuP3zHvWqrR5iEcT8Zf9w-j7raGyBQjvsCnQDCT-bT0iTUWYaevSlGVRhc-HQnDU-dRmWhZaJl5nhnpTJVl1nOCbbnMHsFWPavdLjBtbcU12aql4BxrMY5LbrSV5PFqqwHwfoaU6ajM6UaNH6o1qQuhaMwUjRkebVSiwpgNYLgqNg9cHjcVeIuTorpV3dyUma1lPq_d1WSFEzaAV70gKVzFZJqpajdbYs0IEoSk-8EG8DgI1qqJKapQXpaYUq6J3CoDMYSvp9Rnpy1TeM7LQub8yb_04yXcnh5M1Kf3Rx-fwp2UUEzrpP4MthYXS_ccMdhCv2iX2G8MiyEy |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction+of+subjective+ratings+of+emotional+pictures+by+EEG+features&rft.jtitle=Journal+of+neural+engineering&rft.au=McFarland%2C+Dennis+J&rft.au=Parvaz%2C+Muhammad+A&rft.au=Sarnacki%2C+William+A&rft.au=Goldstein%2C+Rita+Z&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.issn=1741-2552&rft.eissn=1741-2552&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=016009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088%2F1741-2552%2F14%2F1%2F016009&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1741-2560&client=summon |