Half brain irradiation in a murine model of breast cancer brain metastasis: magnetic resonance imaging and histological assessments of dose-response

Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRadiation oncology (London, England) Vol. 13; no. 1; pp. 104 - 11
Main Authors Zarghami, Niloufar, Murrell, Donna H., Jensen, Michael D., Dick, Frederick A., Chambers, Ann F., Foster, Paula J., Wong, Eugene
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 01.06.2018
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Subjects
DNA
NMR
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1748-717X
1748-717X
DOI10.1186/s13014-018-1028-8

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases’ responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Methods Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. Results In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Conclusions Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
AbstractList Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases’ responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Methods Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. Results In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Conclusions Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases' responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations.BACKGROUNDBrain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases' responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations.Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size.METHODSHalf brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size.In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased.RESULTSIn the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased.Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.CONCLUSIONSRadiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases' responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using [gamma]-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. In the acute setting, [gamma]-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While [gamma]-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual [gamma]-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases' responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Methods Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using [gamma]-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. Results In the acute setting, [gamma]-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While [gamma]-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual [gamma]-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Conclusions Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases. Keywords: Breast cancer, Brain metastases, Small animal radiation therapy, Radiation dose-response, Magnetic resonance imaging, DNA double-strand breaks, [gamma]-H2AX
Abstract Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases’ responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Methods Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. Results In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Conclusions Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases' responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern image-guided radiation platforms, mouse models of brain metastases and small animal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), we examined brain metastases’ responses from radiotherapy in the pre-clinical setting. In this study, we employed half brain irradiation to reduce inter-subject variability in metastases dose-response evaluations. Methods Half brain irradiation was performed on a micro-CT/RT system in a human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231-BR) brain metastasis mouse model. Radiation induced DNA double stranded breaks in tumors and normal mouse brain tissue were quantified using γ-H2AX immunohistochemistry at 30 min (acute) and 11 days (longitudinal) after half-brain treatment for doses of 8, 16 and 24 Gy. In addition, tumor responses were assessed volumetrically with in-vivo longitudinal MRI and histologically for tumor cell density and nuclear size. Results In the acute setting, γ-H2AX staining in tumors saturated at higher doses while normal mouse brain tissue continued to increase linearly in the phosphorylation of H2AX. While γ-H2AX fluorescence intensities returned to the background level in the brain 11 days after treatment, the residual γ-H2AX phosphorylation in the radiated tumors remained elevated compared to un-irradiated contralateral tumors. With radiation, MRI-derived relative tumor growth was significantly reduced compared to the un-irradiated side. While there was no difference in MRI tumor volume growth between 16 and 24 Gy, there was a significant reduction in tumor cell density from histology with increasing dose. In the longitudinal study, nuclear size in the residual tumor cells increased significantly as the radiation dose was increased. Conclusions Radiation damages to the DNAs in the normal brain parenchyma are resolved over time, but remain unrepaired in the treated tumors. Furthermore, there is a radiation dose response in nuclear size of surviving tumor cells. Increase in nuclear size together with unrepaired DNA damage indicated that the surviving tumor cells post radiation had continued to progress in the cell cycle with DNA replication, but failed cytokinesis. Half brain irradiation provides efficient evaluation of dose-response for cancer cell lines, a pre-requisite to perform experiments to understand radio-resistance in brain metastases.
ArticleNumber 104
Audience Academic
Author Wong, Eugene
Dick, Frederick A.
Jensen, Michael D.
Foster, Paula J.
Chambers, Ann F.
Murrell, Donna H.
Zarghami, Niloufar
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Niloufar
  surname: Zarghami
  fullname: Zarghami, Niloufar
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Donna H.
  surname: Murrell
  fullname: Murrell, Donna H.
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Michael D.
  surname: Jensen
  fullname: Jensen, Michael D.
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Frederick A.
  surname: Dick
  fullname: Dick, Frederick A.
  organization: Department of Biochemistry, University of Western Ontario, London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Ann F.
  surname: Chambers
  fullname: Chambers, Ann F.
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario
– sequence: 6
  givenname: Paula J.
  surname: Foster
  fullname: Foster, Paula J.
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute
– sequence: 7
  givenname: Eugene
  orcidid: 0000-0001-6869-0122
  surname: Wong
  fullname: Wong, Eugene
  email: ewong4@uwo.ca
  organization: Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London Regional Cancer Program, University of Western Ontario, Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Western Ontario
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859114$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
BookMark eNp9ks1u1DAUhSNURH_gAdggS2zYpNhJ_BMWSFUFtFIlNiCxs27sm9SjxB7sTCXegwfG6QxlpgLkha3r7xz7Xp3T4sgHj0XxktFzxpR4m1hNWVNSpkpGK1WqJ8UJk40qJZPfjvbOx8VpSitKG17T9llxXLWKt4w1J8XPKxh70kVwnrgYwTqYXchnT4BMm-g8kilYHElYMIQ0EwPeYNyJJpxzDZJL78gEg8fZGRIxBb9QxOWa8wMBb8mtS3MYw-AMjARSwpQm9HNarG1IWGbZOviEz4unPYwJX-z2s-Lrxw9fLq_Km8-fri8vbkojaD2XtrZc2qrppGKqk1VrqbB9zSxaJixF1RvZVMAoYCdlxaipW1Sd5UqAFUbWZ8X11tcGWOl1zJ-NP3QAp-8LIQ4aYu5nRN3bTiBvZM2WoTYWeikq1UqGvTId9tnr_dZrvekmtCY3FmE8MD288e5WD-FO81Ytttngzc4ghu8bTLOeXDI4juAxbJKuaNNyrlRDM_r6EboKm-jzqDLFBZdUyj1qgNyA833I75rFVF_wRiheKSEydf4XKi-LkzM5b73L9QPBq_1GHzr8nakMsC1gYkgpYv-AMKqX3OptbnXOrV5yq1XWyEca4-b7JObfuPG_ymqrTPkVP2D8M4t_i34B3kMDXw
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1186_s13578_020_00415_1
crossref_primary_10_1088_2057_1976_ab79f1
crossref_primary_10_3390_cancers13143416
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijrobp_2021_08_010
Cites_doi 10.1593/tlo.12109
10.1007/s00330-003-1957-x
10.1118/1.4933200
10.18632/aging.100025
10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.006
10.1016/j.nurt.2009.04.012
10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.040
10.3109/09553002.2014.922719
10.1667/RR1851.1
10.4161/cbt.2.3.373
10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.016
10.1088/1748-0221/8/06/C06008
10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858
10.3389/fonc.2014.00123
10.1242/jcs.03433
10.1016/j.tranon.2015.03.009
10.3109/09553002.2015.997897
10.1002/mrm.20356
10.4161/cc.5.24.3569
10.4103/2152-7806.111301
10.3390/ijms140815810
10.2174/1568009043481641
10.1667/RR2214.1
10.1118/1.4812422
10.18632/aging.100019
10.1038/sj.onc.1203902
10.1007/s10585-015-9739-9
10.1371/journal.pgen.1000170
10.1186/1471-2407-10-4
10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1486
10.1097/RLI.0b013e318226c427
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright The Author(s). 2018
COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Copyright_xml – notice: The Author(s). 2018
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: Copyright © 2018. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7QO
7X7
7XB
88E
8FD
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
CCPQU
DWQXO
FR3
FYUFA
GHDGH
K9.
M0S
M1P
P64
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
DOA
DOI 10.1186/s13014-018-1028-8
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Technology Research Database
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest Central
Engineering Research Database
Proquest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Technology Research Database
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
ProQuest Central
Health Research Premium Collection
Biotechnology Research Abstracts
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
Engineering Research Database
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList
MEDLINE - Academic



MEDLINE
Publicly Available Content Database
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: DOA
  name: DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
  url: https://www.doaj.org/
  sourceTypes: Open Website
– sequence: 3
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 5
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Medicine
EISSN 1748-717X
EndPage 11
ExternalDocumentID oai_doaj_org_article_fdb6e5473117484daf7628971ef8cbef
PMC5984731
A546852866
29859114
10_1186_s13014_018_1028_8
Genre Journal Article
GeographicLocations Canada
GeographicLocations_xml – name: Canada
GrantInformation_xml – fundername: Breast Cancer Society of Canada
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012172
– fundername: London Regional Cancer Program Catalyst Grant
– fundername: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  funderid: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000038
– fundername: ;
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
123
29P
2WC
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
AAWTL
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFS
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AENEX
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AOIJS
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
E3Z
EBD
EBLON
EBS
EJD
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
H13
HMCUK
HYE
I-F
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SMD
SOJ
TUS
UKHRP
WOQ
WOW
~8M
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
-A0
3V.
ACRMQ
ADINQ
C24
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
7QO
7XB
8FD
8FK
AZQEC
DWQXO
FR3
K9.
P64
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c603t-d3d57d24b7818b729d06df31ded16d0e8fc742a10aeb77210c39e8bd586ad6c73
IEDL.DBID M48
ISSN 1748-717X
IngestDate Wed Aug 27 01:31:31 EDT 2025
Thu Aug 21 14:35:49 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 11:57:53 EDT 2025
Sat Jul 26 02:25:57 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 21:20:58 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 20:28:03 EDT 2025
Wed Feb 19 02:43:35 EST 2025
Tue Jul 01 03:39:24 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:09:52 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:29:31 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Small animal radiation therapy
γ-H2AX
Magnetic resonance imaging
Breast cancer
Brain metastases
DNA double-strand breaks
Radiation dose-response
Language English
License Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c603t-d3d57d24b7818b729d06df31ded16d0e8fc742a10aeb77210c39e8bd586ad6c73
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ORCID 0000-0001-6869-0122
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-018-1028-8
PMID 29859114
PQID 2056570770
PQPubID 55355
PageCount 11
ParticipantIDs doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fdb6e5473117484daf7628971ef8cbef
pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_5984731
proquest_miscellaneous_2049558840
proquest_journals_2056570770
gale_infotracmisc_A546852866
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A546852866
pubmed_primary_29859114
crossref_primary_10_1186_s13014_018_1028_8
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_s13014_018_1028_8
springer_journals_10_1186_s13014_018_1028_8
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2018-06-01
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2018-06-01
PublicationDate_xml – month: 06
  year: 2018
  text: 2018-06-01
  day: 01
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Radiation oncology (London, England)
PublicationTitleAbbrev Radiat Oncol
PublicationTitleAlternate Radiat Oncol
PublicationYear 2018
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
BMC
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
– name: BMC
References K Thind (1028_CR21) 2014; 110
C Heyn (1028_CR39) 2005; 53
JP Banáth (1028_CR33) 2010; 10
A Ivashkevich (1028_CR29) 2013; 487
1028_CR9
CA Perez (1028_CR22) 2013
K Scheffler (1028_CR27) 2003; 13
D Smart (1028_CR3) 2015; 32
AJ Nakamura (1028_CR34) 2009; 1
1028_CR4
M Grams (1028_CR7) 2014; 90
DB Percy (1028_CR26) 2011; 46
E Ford (1028_CR8) 2016; 26
N Bhogal (1028_CR16) 2010; 173
1028_CR30
N Andratschke (1028_CR17) 2011; 31
1028_CR13
1028_CR10
1028_CR38
DH Murrell (1028_CR1) 2016; 9
1028_CR15
1028_CR37
1028_CR14
1028_CR36
N Zarghami (1028_CR6) 2015; 42
EC Ford (1028_CR28) 2011; 175
F Conley (1028_CR19) 1979; 39
K Rothkamm (1028_CR11) 2009; 45
EI Azzam (1028_CR41) 2004; 4
T Yu (1028_CR35) 2006; 5
CF Pereira (1028_CR32) 2008; 4
CM Brown (1028_CR5) 2007; 120
T Yoneda (1028_CR18) 2001; 16
1028_CR20
1028_CR40
1028_CR23
L Hernández (1028_CR31) 2013; 14
WM Bonner (1028_CR12) 2011; 8
T Ranjan (1028_CR24) 2009; 6
DH Murrell (1028_CR2) 2016; 0
1028_CR25
18773085 - PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 05;4(9):e1000170
22198208 - Cancer Lett. 2012 Dec 31;327(1-2):123-33
23927303 - Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):081706
9488723 - J Biol Chem. 1998 Mar 6;273(10):5858-68
12878854 - Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 May-Jun;2(3):233-5
24904834 - Front Oncol. 2014 May 26;4:123
23903043 - Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jul 30;14(8):15810-26
24844370 - Int J Radiat Biol. 2014 Oct;90(10 ):936-942
26520740 - Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6507-13
26055175 - Transl Oncol. 2015 Jun;8(3):176-84
15678551 - Magn Reson Med. 2005 Feb;53(2):312-20
427739 - Cancer Res. 1979 Mar;39(3):1001-7
27554118 - Biomed Environ Sci. 2016 Jul;29(7):484-93
12928954 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2409-18
21378339 - Anticancer Res. 2011 Feb;31(2):561-4
25529973 - Int J Radiat Biol. 2015 Apr;91(4):360-7
20157510 - Aging (Albany NY). 2009 Feb 04;1(2):212-8
27267840 - Transl Oncol. 2016 Jun;9(3):219-27
22741041 - Transl Oncol. 2012 Jun;5(3):217-25
23717795 - Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 02;4(Suppl 4):S236-44
27851873 - Magn Reson Med. 2017 Oct;78(4):1506-1512
21449714 - Radiat Res. 2011 Jun;175(6):774-83
20041754 - Radiat Res. 2010 Jan;173(1):1-9
11499871 - J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Aug;16(8):1486-95
20157507 - Aging (Albany NY). 2009 Feb 17;1(2):154-6
17502480 - J Cell Sci. 2007 May 15;120(Pt 10):1703-5
27619256 - Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct;26(4):349-55
19560748 - Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Jul;6(3):598-603
14965267 - Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004 Feb;4(1):53-64
19861731 - Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(3):265-71
20051134 - BMC Cancer. 2010 Jan 05;10:4
26319493 - Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015 Oct;32(7):717-27
19005492 - Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Dec;8(12):957-67
16814620 - DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Aug 13;5(8):935-46
24440041 - Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):317-22
11077445 - Oncogene. 2000 Nov 2;19(46):5281-90
17172873 - Cell Cycle. 2006 Dec;5(24):2909-13
21788908 - Invest Radiol. 2011 Nov;46(11):718-25
References_xml – volume: 45
  start-page: 265
  year: 2009
  ident: 1028_CR11
  publication-title: Ann Ist Super Sanita
– ident: 1028_CR25
  doi: 10.1593/tlo.12109
– volume: 13
  start-page: 2409
  year: 2003
  ident: 1028_CR27
  publication-title: Eur Radiol
  doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1957-x
– volume: 42
  start-page: 6507
  year: 2015
  ident: 1028_CR6
  publication-title: Med Phys [Internet]
  doi: 10.1118/1.4933200
– ident: 1028_CR13
  doi: 10.18632/aging.100025
– volume: 9
  start-page: 219
  year: 2016
  ident: 1028_CR1
  publication-title: Transl. Oncol. [Internet]. The Authors
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2016.04.006
– volume: 6
  start-page: 598
  year: 2009
  ident: 1028_CR24
  publication-title: Neurotherapeutics
  doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2009.04.012
– volume: 5
  start-page: 935
  year: 2006
  ident: 1028_CR35
  publication-title: DNA Repair (Amst)
  doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.05.040
– volume: 90
  start-page: 936
  year: 2014
  ident: 1028_CR7
  publication-title: Int J Radiat Biol
  doi: 10.3109/09553002.2014.922719
– volume: 173
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 1028_CR16
  publication-title: Radiat Res
  doi: 10.1667/RR1851.1
– ident: 1028_CR9
  doi: 10.4161/cbt.2.3.373
– volume: 110
  start-page: 317
  year: 2014
  ident: 1028_CR21
  publication-title: Radiother Oncol [Internet] Elsevier Ireland Ltd
  doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.016
– ident: 1028_CR30
  doi: 10.1088/1748-0221/8/06/C06008
– ident: 1028_CR10
  doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.10.5858
– ident: 1028_CR36
  doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00123
– volume: 120
  start-page: 1703
  year: 2007
  ident: 1028_CR5
  publication-title: J Cell Sci [Internet]
  doi: 10.1242/jcs.03433
– ident: 1028_CR40
  doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.03.009
– ident: 1028_CR15
  doi: 10.3109/09553002.2015.997897
– volume: 487
  start-page: 109
  year: 2013
  ident: 1028_CR29
  publication-title: Cancer Lett
– volume: 53
  start-page: 312
  year: 2005
  ident: 1028_CR39
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med
  doi: 10.1002/mrm.20356
– ident: 1028_CR38
– ident: 1028_CR14
  doi: 10.4161/cc.5.24.3569
– ident: 1028_CR23
  doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.111301
– volume: 14
  start-page: 15810
  year: 2013
  ident: 1028_CR31
  publication-title: Int J Mol Sci
  doi: 10.3390/ijms140815810
– volume: 4
  start-page: 53
  year: 2004
  ident: 1028_CR41
  publication-title: Curr Cancer Drug Targets
  doi: 10.2174/1568009043481641
– volume: 175
  start-page: 774
  year: 2011
  ident: 1028_CR28
  publication-title: Radiat Res
  doi: 10.1667/RR2214.1
– ident: 1028_CR4
  doi: 10.1593/tlo.12109
– volume: 26
  start-page: 349
  year: 2016
  ident: 1028_CR8
  publication-title: Elsevier
– ident: 1028_CR20
  doi: 10.1118/1.4812422
– volume: 1
  start-page: 212
  year: 2009
  ident: 1028_CR34
  publication-title: Aging (Albany NY)
  doi: 10.18632/aging.100019
– ident: 1028_CR37
  doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203902
– volume-title: Perez and Brady’s principles and practice of radiation oncology
  year: 2013
  ident: 1028_CR22
– volume: 32
  start-page: 717
  year: 2015
  ident: 1028_CR3
  publication-title: Clin Exp Metastasis [Internet] Springer Netherlands
  doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9739-9
– volume: 4
  start-page: 1
  year: 2008
  ident: 1028_CR32
  publication-title: PLoS Genet
  doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000170
– volume: 31
  start-page: 561
  year: 2011
  ident: 1028_CR17
  publication-title: Anticancer Res
– volume: 39
  start-page: 1001
  year: 1979
  ident: 1028_CR19
  publication-title: Cancer Res [Internet]
– volume: 8
  start-page: 957
  year: 2011
  ident: 1028_CR12
  publication-title: Cancer
– volume: 0
  start-page: 1
  year: 2016
  ident: 1028_CR2
  publication-title: Magn Reson Med [Internet]
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1
  year: 2010
  ident: 1028_CR33
  publication-title: BMC Cancer
  doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-4
– volume: 16
  start-page: 1486
  year: 2001
  ident: 1028_CR18
  publication-title: J Bone Miner Res
  doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.8.1486
– volume: 46
  start-page: 718
  year: 2011
  ident: 1028_CR26
  publication-title: Investig Radiol
  doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318226c427
– reference: 23903043 - Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Jul 30;14(8):15810-26
– reference: 16814620 - DNA Repair (Amst). 2006 Aug 13;5(8):935-46
– reference: 27267840 - Transl Oncol. 2016 Jun;9(3):219-27
– reference: 21378339 - Anticancer Res. 2011 Feb;31(2):561-4
– reference: 24440041 - Radiother Oncol. 2014 Feb;110(2):317-22
– reference: 9488723 - J Biol Chem. 1998 Mar 6;273(10):5858-68
– reference: 23717795 - Surg Neurol Int. 2013 May 02;4(Suppl 4):S236-44
– reference: 20157510 - Aging (Albany NY). 2009 Feb 04;1(2):212-8
– reference: 26520740 - Med Phys. 2015 Nov;42(11):6507-13
– reference: 427739 - Cancer Res. 1979 Mar;39(3):1001-7
– reference: 26055175 - Transl Oncol. 2015 Jun;8(3):176-84
– reference: 19861731 - Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2009;45(3):265-71
– reference: 22198208 - Cancer Lett. 2012 Dec 31;327(1-2):123-33
– reference: 19005492 - Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Dec;8(12):957-67
– reference: 27554118 - Biomed Environ Sci. 2016 Jul;29(7):484-93
– reference: 27851873 - Magn Reson Med. 2017 Oct;78(4):1506-1512
– reference: 12928954 - Eur Radiol. 2003 Nov;13(11):2409-18
– reference: 14965267 - Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2004 Feb;4(1):53-64
– reference: 11077445 - Oncogene. 2000 Nov 2;19(46):5281-90
– reference: 20157507 - Aging (Albany NY). 2009 Feb 17;1(2):154-6
– reference: 27619256 - Semin Radiat Oncol. 2016 Oct;26(4):349-55
– reference: 24904834 - Front Oncol. 2014 May 26;4:123
– reference: 12878854 - Cancer Biol Ther. 2003 May-Jun;2(3):233-5
– reference: 17502480 - J Cell Sci. 2007 May 15;120(Pt 10):1703-5
– reference: 26319493 - Clin Exp Metastasis. 2015 Oct;32(7):717-27
– reference: 17172873 - Cell Cycle. 2006 Dec;5(24):2909-13
– reference: 15678551 - Magn Reson Med. 2005 Feb;53(2):312-20
– reference: 21449714 - Radiat Res. 2011 Jun;175(6):774-83
– reference: 24844370 - Int J Radiat Biol. 2014 Oct;90(10 ):936-942
– reference: 25529973 - Int J Radiat Biol. 2015 Apr;91(4):360-7
– reference: 18773085 - PLoS Genet. 2008 Sep 05;4(9):e1000170
– reference: 21788908 - Invest Radiol. 2011 Nov;46(11):718-25
– reference: 20051134 - BMC Cancer. 2010 Jan 05;10:4
– reference: 23927303 - Med Phys. 2013 Aug;40(8):081706
– reference: 20041754 - Radiat Res. 2010 Jan;173(1):1-9
– reference: 19560748 - Neurotherapeutics. 2009 Jul;6(3):598-603
– reference: 22741041 - Transl Oncol. 2012 Jun;5(3):217-25
– reference: 11499871 - J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Aug;16(8):1486-95
SSID ssj0045309
Score 2.2036433
Snippet Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of...
Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of modern...
Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging availability of...
Abstract Background Brain metastasis is becoming increasingly prevalent in breast cancer due to improved extra-cranial disease control. With emerging...
SourceID doaj
pubmedcentral
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Website
Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 104
SubjectTerms Animal models
Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Brain - diagnostic imaging
Brain - metabolism
Brain - radiation effects
Brain cancer
Brain damage
Brain metastases
Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Brain Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Brain Neoplasms - secondary
Brain tumors
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Cancer
Cancer metastasis
Cancer Research
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Cell cycle
Cell Cycle - radiation effects
Cell density
Cell Line, Tumor
Cell size
Computed tomography
Correlation analysis
Cranial Irradiation - methods
Cytokinesis
Density
Deoxyribonucleic acid
Development and progression
Disease control
Disease Models, Animal
Dissection
DNA
DNA biosynthesis
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded - radiation effects
DNA damage
DNA double-strand breaks
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
Drug dosages
Female
Fluorescence
Histology
Histones - metabolism
Histones - radiation effects
Humans
Imaging
Immunohistochemistry
Internet
Irradiation
Longitudinal Studies
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical imaging
Metastases
Metastasis
Mice
Mice, Nude
Neuroimaging
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Oncology
Parenchyma
Permeability
Phosphorylation
Phosphorylation - radiation effects
Radiation Biology and Molecular Radiation Oncology
Radiation damage
Radiation dosage
Radiation dose-response
Radiation effects
Radiation therapy
Radiation Tolerance - physiology
Radiology
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy in preclinical animal models
Resonance
Small animal radiation therapy
Tumor cell lines
Tumor cells
Tumors
X-Rays
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  dbid: DOA
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwrV3fa9UwFA6yB_FF1PmjOkcEQVDKkjZJU9822bgI88nB3kKapHphtx3t3X_iH-w5aW5dJ-qLj21OSpJzcnK-JvkOIW-FryTi5ByiC5GLCgCKFpLjBebaBYBcpccd3fMvanUhPl_Ky1upvvBM2EQPPA3cUesbFTBBLudIe-ltC9NX1xUPrXZNaNH7sprtwNTkg4UsWZ32MLlWRyNH5ACwGalMC53rxSoUyfp_d8m31qS75yXvbJrGtejsEXmYgkh6PDX-MbkXuifk_nnaJt8nP1b2qqUNZn-g62FA-gEcfwqPlm7w_3qgMQUO7VEM0_dQh-ofUqVN2MI7O67Hj3Rjv3V405ECMO-RniPQ9SbmNqK28zQSFicHSu3M8znip30_hnyYTuGGp-Ti7PTrp1We0i_kTrFym_vSy8oXoqlgUW8gCPdM-bbkPniuPAu6dYCrLWc2NBCjc-bKOujGS62sV64qn5G9ru_CC0JrKZQKliP7neBeAkasIW7wQTHhwMtkhO3UYVziJscUGVcmYhStzKRBAxo0qEGjM_J-rnI9EXP8TfgEdTwLIqd2fAGWZpKlmX9ZWkbeoYUYnPnQOGfTBQboInJomWPopJaFViojBwtJmLFuWbyzMZM8xmgKhhvQrKpYRt7MxVgTT8F1ob9BGYCzeLMYZJ5PJjl3qaiRiZCLjFQLY130eVnSrb9HPnFZa-x1Rj7szPpXs_44pC__x5C-Ig8KnJTxr9YB2dsON-E1BHnb5jDO559oDk04
  priority: 102
  providerName: Directory of Open Access Journals
– databaseName: Health & Medical Collection
  dbid: 7X7
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fi9QwEA56gvgi_r56p0QQBKWYtGmS-iKneCzC-eTBvoU0Sc-F2_Zs9_4T_-CbyWZ79sR73GaydDqTSb5M8g0hb4VXFeLkHFYXIhcKAIoWFccLzLULALlKjxndkx9ycSq-L6tl2nAb07HKXUyMgdr3DvfIAaRjgo4pxT5f_M6xahRmV1MJjbvkXqQuA39Wywlwiapkdcpkci0_jhzxA4BnJDQtdK5nc1Gk7P83MP81M908NXkjdRpnpONH5GFaStKjre0fkzuhe0Lun6Rk-VPyZ2HPW9pgDQi6GgYkIUArUPhp6Rp32QONhXBoj2JYxIc6dIIhdVqHDTyz42r8RNf2rMP7jhTgeY8kHYGu1rHCEbWdp5G2OIVRaie2zxH_2vdjyIftWdzwjJwef_v5dZGnIgy5k6zc5L70lfKFaBRM7Q0sxT2Tvi25D55Lz4JuHaBry5kNDazUOXNlHXTjKy2tl06Vz8le13dhn1AwkJTBcuTAE9xXgBRrWD34IJlwEGsywnbmMC4xlGOhjHMTkYqWZmtBAxY0aEGjM_J-6nKxpee4TfgL2ngSRGbt-KAfzkwaqKb1jQxYkJlzpFn1toXpQteKh1a7JrQZeYceYnD8w8s5m64xgIrIpGWOQEldFVrKjBzOJGHcunnzzsdMihujufbyjLyZmrEnnoXrQn-JMgBq8X4xyLzYuuSkUlEjHyEXGVEzZ53pPG_pVr8iq3hVa9Q6Ix92bn39Wv_9pC9vV-KAPChwuMVdq0OytxkuwytYxG2a13GkXgGcuEQM
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  dbid: C6C
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1bi9UwEA66gvgi3re6SgRBUIpJm6Spb-vichDWJxf2LaRJqgf2tNKe_Sf7g3cmzanb9QI-tpmUTmcmmelkviHkjfCVxDg5B-9C5KKCAEULybGAuXYBQq7SY0b35KtanYovZ_IsgUVjLcz1_D3X6sPI0eeHgBdBSAud69vkjuSlinlZdbRbdIUsWZ2Sln-ctth2Ijr_72vwtU3o5gHJG1nSuPkcPyD3k9dIDycxPyS3QveI3D1JefHH5HJlz1vaYLsHuh4GxBvAD07h0tIN_lAPNPa8oT2SYb8e6lDeQ5q0CVu4Z8f1-JFu7PcOSxspROI94nEEut7EZkbUdp5GhOK0YlI7A3uO-GjfjyEfpmO34Qk5Pf787WiVp34LuVOs3Oa-9LLyhWgq2MUb8Lo9U74tuQ-eK8-Cbh0E0pYzGxpwyjlzZR1046VW1itXlU_JXtd3YZ_QWgqlguUIdye4lxAU1uAo-KCYcLCsZITtxGFcAiPHnhjnJgYlWplJggYkaFCCRmfk3Tzl54TE8S_iTyjjmRBBtOMN0C2TbNK0vlEBey9zjoiq3rawM-i64qHVrgltRt6ihhg0dXg5Z1PFArCIoFnmEJjUstBKZeRgQQkm6pbDOx0zaYkYTcEw48yqimXk9TyMM_HYWxf6C6SB-BVLiYHm2aSSM0tFjdCDXGSkWijrguflSLf-EQHEZa2R64y836n1r9f66yd9_l_UL8i9Aq0v_q86IHvb4SK8BPdt27yKhnsFl9k8eg
  priority: 102
  providerName: Springer Nature
Title Half brain irradiation in a murine model of breast cancer brain metastasis: magnetic resonance imaging and histological assessments of dose-response
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13014-018-1028-8
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29859114
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2056570770
https://www.proquest.com/docview/2049558840
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC5984731
https://doaj.org/article/fdb6e5473117484daf7628971ef8cbef
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwjV1ti9QwEA73AuIX8f2q5xJBEJRqX9I0FUT2ljuWhT1EXdhvIU3Sc2G31XYP9H_4g51Ju9Wep_hp2WZSkmYmM09eniHkGTNpgjjZh-iC-SwFgCJYEuIF5kxbgFyxwR3d-TmfLthsmSz3yC69VfcBm2uhHeaTWtTrV9--fn8HBv_WGbzgr5sQcQGAYiQqjYQv9skhOCaOWGzO-k0FlsTuxAfE4MIHFLPsNjmvfcXATTk2_z_n7N-c1tUDlVd2VZ2zOrtNbnVRJh23anGH7NnyLrkx7_bR75EfU7UuaI7pIeiqrpGfAAeIwl9FN7gAb6nLkUMrFMP8PlSjftRdpY3dwjPVrJo3dKMuSrwKSQG5V8jfYelq45IfUVUa6hiNuxmWqp4ItMFXm6qxft0e07X3yeLs9NNk6nf5GXzNg3jrm9gkqYlYnoLXzyFKNwE3RRwaa0JuAisKDcBbhYGyOQTxYaDjzIrcJIIrw3UaPyAHZVXaI0KzhHFuVYj0eCw0CYDIDAILY3nANExDHgl2wyF1R16OOTTW0oEYwWU7ghJGUOIISuGRF32VLy1zx7-ET3CMe0Ek3XYPqvpCdjYsC5Nzi7maQ1QhZlQBnkRkaWgLoXNbeOQ5aohEZYXGadXdcIAuIsmWHEMnRRIJzj1yPJAEk9bD4p2OyZ1FyCjAHeogTQOPPO2LsSYekyttdYkygHfx6jHIPGxVsu9SlCFVYcg8kg6UddDnYUm5-uwIx5NMYK898nKn1r-a9ddP-ug_WvmY3IzQ5tyq1jE52NaX9gkEedt8RPbTZToih-Px7OMMfk9Oz99_gKcTPhm5hZORM-6fbBZQ_Q
linkProvider Scholars Portal
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtV1fb9QwDI_GTYK9IP5TGBAkEBKoomnTNEVCaINNN7Y7IbRJewtpkm4n7drR3oT4HnwOPiN2_9zoEHvb4zVOVZ8dO784tgl5wW0SI072YXfBfZ4AQJE8ZpjAnBoHkCuyGNGdTMX4gH8-jA9XyO8-FwavVfY2sTHUtjR4Rg4gHQN0QZIEH06_-9g1CqOrfQuNVi123c8fANnq9zufQL4vw3B7a__j2O-6CvhGBNHCt5GNExvyLAFflcHe0gbC5hGzzjJhAydzA3BRs0C7DLaeLDBR6mRmYym0FSaJ4L3XyCrHjNYRWd3cmn752tt-HkdB2sVOmRRva4aIBeA6llANpS8H3q9pEvCvK_jLF168p3khWNv4wO1b5Ga3eaUbrbbdJiuuuEOuT7rw_F3ya6xPcpph1wk6qyose4Byp_BT0zme6zvatN6hJZJh2yBqUO2qbtLcLeCZrmf1OzrXRwVmWNLKIVwAKjqbNz2VqC4sbQold4ab6mV90Rpfbcva-VV7-9fdIwdXIqD7ZFSUhXtIaBpzIZxmWHWPMxsDNk1hv2KdCLgB6-aRoBeHMl1NdGzNcaIabCSFaiWoQIIKJaikR14vp5y2BUEuI95EGS8JsZZ386CsjlRnGlRuM-GwBTRjWNjV6hwclEwT5nJpMpd75BVqiEKLAx9ndJc4ASxi7S61AUzKOJRCeGR9QAmWwgyHex1TnaWq1fm68sjz5TDOxNt3hSvPkAZgNGY0A82DViWXLIUpVkBk3CPJQFkHPA9HitlxU8c8TiVy7ZE3vVqff9Z__9JHlzPxjNwY70_21N7OdPcxWQtx6TVnZutktKjO3BPYQi6yp926peTbVZuKP2cNgt8
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV1Lb9QwELagSBUXVJ4NLWAkJCRQVDtxHIdbKayWRysOVOrNcmynrNRNqiT9J_xgZhJnIeUhcUw8jjKZ8Twy9jeEvBAuzzBPjiG6ELHIIUFRIuN4gLmwHlKu1GFF9_hELk_Fx7PsLPQ57abd7lNJcjzTgChNdX9w6apxiSt50HHMBCANRmjSRMXqJrkl0PNhtVYeTaZYZCkrQinzj9NmzmjA7P_dMv_imq5vm7xWOx1c0mKH3AmxJD0chX-X3PD1PbJ9HKrl98n3pbmoaIlNIOiqbRGFAMVA4dLQNf5m93TohEMbJMMuPtSiFrRh0tr3cM90q-4NXZvzGg88UsjPG0Tp8HS1HlocUVM7OuAWBztKzQbus8NHu6bzcTtuxvUPyOni_dejZRy6MMRWsrSPXeqy3CWizMG3lxCLOyZdlXLnHZeOeVVZSK8NZ8aXEKpzZtPCq9JlShonbZ4-JFt1U_tdQotMSOkNRxA8wV0GqWIB4YPzkgkLxiYibBKHtgGiHDtlXOghVVFSjxLUIEGNEtQqIq82Uy5HfI5_Eb9FGW8IEVp7uNG05zqsVF25UnrsyMw54qw6U4G_UEXOfaVs6auIvEQN0WgA4OWsCecYgEWE0tKHwKTKEiVlRPZnlLBw7Xx40jEdDEenE4Z1aJbnLCLPN8M4EzfD1b65QhrIavGAMdA8GlVyw1JSICAhFxHJZ8o643k-Uq--DbDiWaGQ64i8ntT652v99ZM-_i_qZ2T7y7uF_vzh5NMeuZ3gQhx-aO2Trb698k8gvuvLp8Ma_gEOlkeu
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Half+brain+irradiation+in+a+murine+model+of+breast+cancer+brain+metastasis%3A+magnetic+resonance+imaging+and+histological+assessments+of+dose-response&rft.jtitle=Radiation+oncology+%28London%2C+England%29&rft.au=Zarghami%2C+Niloufar&rft.au=Murrell%2C+Donna+H&rft.au=Jensen%2C+Michael+D&rft.au=Dick%2C+Frederick+A&rft.date=2018-06-01&rft.issn=1748-717X&rft.eissn=1748-717X&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2Fs13014-018-1028-8&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1748-717X&client=summon