Modelling recurrent events: comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data
Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurre...
Saved in:
Published in | Malaria journal Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 293 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
BioMed Central
29.07.2014
BioMed Central Ltd |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1475-2875 1475-2875 |
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-293 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | Background
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures.
Methods
This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes.
Results
Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.
With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach.
Conclusion
Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. |
---|---|
AbstractList | Doc number: 293 Abstract Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods: This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results: Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion: Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Keywords: Recurrent events, Malaria, Discontinuous risk intervals, Extended Cox model, Shared frailty model, GEE Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures.BACKGROUNDRecurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures.This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes.METHODSThis work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes.Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach.RESULTSUsing the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach.Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.CONCLUSIONRepeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods: This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results: Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion: Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. |
ArticleNumber | 293 |
Audience | Academic |
Author | Piarroux, Renaud Gaudart, Jean Sagara, Issaka Doumbo, Ogobara K Giorgi, Roch |
AuthorAffiliation | 1 Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, BP 1805 Point G, Bamako, Mali 2 Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU), Marseille 13005, France 3 Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3, Marseille 13005, France |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: 2 Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU), Marseille 13005, France – name: 1 Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, BP 1805 Point G, Bamako, Mali – name: 3 Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3, Marseille 13005, France |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Issaka surname: Sagara fullname: Sagara, Issaka email: isagara@icermali.org organization: Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU) – sequence: 2 givenname: Roch surname: Giorgi fullname: Giorgi, Roch organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU) – sequence: 3 givenname: Ogobara K surname: Doumbo fullname: Doumbo, Ogobara K organization: Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako – sequence: 4 givenname: Renaud surname: Piarroux fullname: Piarroux, Renaud organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3 – sequence: 5 givenname: Jean surname: Gaudart fullname: Gaudart, Jean organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU) |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25073652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed https://hal.science/hal-01208210$$DView record in HAL |
BookMark | eNqNkktv1DAUhSNURB-wZ4UssYHFFD_iR1hUGlWFIg1iA2vLje0Zl8Qe7GQQ_4Kf3BumLdMRIBTJia6_c5ycnOPqIKboquo5waeEKPGG1JLPqIKFsBlt2KPq6H50sPN8WB2Xco0xkUrSJ9Uh5VgywelR9fNjsq7rQlyi7NoxZxcH5DawlreoTf3a5FBSRMmjMpghlCG0pkP9pCroexhWQMUhxDGNBZlokQ1lZwLqryjEweWNAQE4_T6mNx24G-TWcIR1BVkzmKfVYw-ke3Z7P6m-vLv4fH45W3x6_-F8vpi1AuNhdmW9k4baRta1V5go7JT3ThjGVe2tNFwR2GASi4YqK2uOmW9aURPnKK4FO6nOtr7r8ap3toUXyqbT6xx6k3_oZIJ-uBPDSi_TRteEUdI0YPB6a7Dak13OF3qaYUKxogRvCLCvbg_L6dvoyqB7SAlyN9FBSppwAbRsOP8PlDNGJFET-nIPvU5jjpDaL0pSKugOtTSd0yH6BJ_TTqZ6zlkjWI0lBur0DxRc1vUB_qfzAeYPBC9287tP4K5aAIgt0OZUSnZet2FqUJriDJ0mWE8d1lNJ9VRSTZiGDoMQ7wnvvP8hIVtJATQuXd5J4m-aG1FcAs4 |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciy319 crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjqcco_qcx015 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12882_020_01874_x crossref_primary_10_1186_s41512_025_00187_7 crossref_primary_10_1192_bjp_2020_190 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10461_017_1924_1 crossref_primary_10_1177_1479973118815694 crossref_primary_10_1080_00036846_2023_2200234 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_020_00965_5 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_78512_1 crossref_primary_10_1080_09286586_2018_1513042 crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2023_003489 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_017_0350_4 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_016_1253_2 crossref_primary_10_1080_16066359_2023_2189245 crossref_primary_10_3389_fepid_2022_924783 crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9999 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijforecast_2022_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_019_2885_9 crossref_primary_10_1097_OLQ_0000000000000986 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12890_017_0503_6 crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2020_36321 crossref_primary_10_18778_0208_6018_348_07 crossref_primary_10_1093_rheumatology_kead232 |
Cites_doi | 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970430)16:8<833::AID-SIM538>3.0.CO;2-2 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00890.x 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0649 10.1177/1094428104263672 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.019 10.1002/sim.4095 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5 10.1191/0962280202sm278ra 10.1002/sim.5458 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17223-1 10.1136/jech.2004.030759 10.2307/2531734 10.1016/j.respe.2007.04.003 10.1002/0471445428 10.2307/2531248 10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x 10.1214/aos/1176345976 10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8 10.1002/sim.4780111406 10.1002/sim.2673 10.2307/2061224 10.1002/sim.3749 10.1186/1475-2875-12-82 10.1093/biomet/68.2.373 10.3414/ME0478 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License Copyright © 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 – notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd. – notice: 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. – notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License – notice: Copyright © 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. |
DBID | C6C AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 3V. 7SS 7U9 7X7 7XB 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ 8FK ABUWG AEUYN AFKRA AZQEC BENPR C1K CCPQU DWQXO F1W FYUFA GHDGH H94 H95 H97 K9. L.G M0S M1P M7N PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PKEHL PPXIY PQEST PQQKQ PQUKI PRINS 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM |
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-293 |
DatabaseName | Springer Nature OA Free Journals CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed ProQuest Central (Corporate) Entomology Abstracts (Full archive) Virology and AIDS Abstracts Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest) ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016) Medical Database (Alumni Edition) Public Health Database (ProQuest) Hospital Premium Collection Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016) ProQuest Central (Alumni) ProQuest One Sustainability ProQuest Central UK/Ireland ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Central Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest One ProQuest Central Korea ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest Health & Medical Collection Medical Database (ProQuest) Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) ProQuest Central Premium ProQuest One Academic (New) Publicly Available Content Database ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE) ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ProQuest Central China MEDLINE - Academic Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access) PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) Publicly Available Content Database Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New) ProQuest Central Essentials ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni) ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition) ProQuest One Community College ProQuest One Health & Nursing ProQuest Central China Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management ProQuest Central ProQuest One Sustainability Health Research Premium Collection Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition) ProQuest Central Korea Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C) Health & Medical Research Collection AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources ProQuest Central (New) ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni) ProQuest Public Health Virology and AIDS Abstracts ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition ProQuest Hospital Collection Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni) ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni) Entomology Abstracts ProQuest Health & Medical Complete ProQuest Medical Library ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts ProQuest One Academic ProQuest One Academic (New) ProQuest Central (Alumni) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | Publicly Available Content Database MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: C6C name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals url: http://www.springeropen.com/ sourceTypes: Publisher – sequence: 2 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 3 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 4 dbid: BENPR name: ProQuest Central url: https://www.proquest.com/central sourceTypes: Aggregation Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Public Health Statistics Mathematics Environmental Sciences |
EISSN | 1475-2875 |
EndPage | 293 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC4132199 oai_HAL_hal_01208210v1 3405411371 A539634070 25073652 10_1186_1475_2875_13_293 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article |
GroupedDBID | --- 0R~ 29M 2WC 4.4 53G 5VS 7X7 88E 8C1 8FI 8FJ AAFWJ AAJSJ AASML ABDBF ABUWG ACGFO ACGFS ACIHN ACMJI ACPRK ACUHS ADBBV ADRAZ ADUKV AEAQA AENEX AEUYN AFKRA AFPKN AHBYD AHMBA AHSBF AHYZX ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AMKLP AMTXH AOIJS BAPOH BAWUL BCNDV BENPR BFQNJ BMC BPHCQ BVXVI C6C CCPQU CS3 DIK DU5 E3Z EAD EAP EAS EBD EBLON EBS ECGQY EJD EMB EMK EMOBN ESX F5P FYUFA GROUPED_DOAJ GX1 H13 HMCUK HYE IAO IHR INH INR IPNFZ ITC KQ8 M1P M48 M~E O5R O5S OK1 OVT P2P PGMZT PHGZM PHGZT PIMPY PJZUB PPXIY PQQKQ PROAC PSQYO PUEGO RBZ RIG RNS ROL RPM RSV SBL SOJ SV3 TR2 TUS U2A UKHRP W2D WOQ WOW XSB AAYXX ALIPV CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM PMFND 3V. 7SS 7U9 7XB 8FK AZQEC C1K DWQXO F1W H94 H95 H97 K9. L.G M7N PKEHL PQEST PQUKI PRINS 7X8 1XC VOOES 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-bdfe7a2d9744f80180e8ffe6a3584fd7a5814f83706928d74503f9c641ee20463 |
IEDL.DBID | C6C |
ISSN | 1475-2875 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:14:18 EDT 2025 Thu Jul 10 08:57:06 EDT 2025 Fri Sep 05 05:37:46 EDT 2025 Thu Sep 04 22:20:15 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 25 03:24:19 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 17 22:05:23 EDT 2025 Tue Jun 10 21:02:59 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 03 07:09:09 EDT 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:39:39 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:05:40 EDT 2025 Sat Sep 06 07:30:03 EDT 2025 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | true |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1 |
Keywords | Extended Cox model Malaria Shared frailty model Discontinuous risk intervals GEE Recurrent events |
Language | English |
License | Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
LinkModel | DirectLink |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c600t-bdfe7a2d9744f80180e8ffe6a3584fd7a5814f83706928d74503f9c641ee20463 |
Notes | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 content type line 23 PMCID: PMC4132199 |
ORCID | 0000-0001-9006-5729 0000-0001-6135-3078 |
OpenAccessLink | https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-293 |
PMID | 25073652 |
PQID | 1553722625 |
PQPubID | 42600 |
PageCount | 1 |
ParticipantIDs | pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4132199 hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01208210v1 proquest_miscellaneous_1560127955 proquest_miscellaneous_1553317185 proquest_journals_1553722625 gale_infotracmisc_A539634070 gale_infotracacademiconefile_A539634070 pubmed_primary_25073652 crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293 crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293 springer_journals_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293 |
ProviderPackageCode | CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2014-07-29 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2014-07-29 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 07 year: 2014 text: 2014-07-29 day: 29 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | London |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: London – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Malaria journal |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Malar J |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Malar J |
PublicationYear | 2014 |
Publisher | BioMed Central BioMed Central Ltd |
Publisher_xml | – name: BioMed Central – name: BioMed Central Ltd |
References | J Castilloa (3335_CR30) 2005; 134 A Burton (3335_CR31) 2006; 25 PJ Kelly (3335_CR5) 2000; 19 TM Gill (3335_CR10) 2006; 54 D Coulibaly (3335_CR14) 2013; 12 Z Guo (3335_CR8) 2008; 47 JWR Twisk (3335_CR2) 2005; 59 J Gaudart (3335_CR15) 2007; 55 PK Andersen (3335_CR18) 1982; 10 TM Therneau (3335_CR3) 2000 JW Vaupel (3335_CR20) 1979; 16 KY Liang (3335_CR26) 1993; 14 RL Prentice (3335_CR16) 1981; 68 P Hougaard (3335_CR21) 2000 JL Fleiss (3335_CR24) 2003 S Ullah (3335_CR13) 2012 A Wienke (3335_CR23) 2010; 29 LJ Wei (3335_CR4) 1997; 16 Y Xu (3335_CR12) 2012; 31 DWJ Hosmer (3335_CR25) 1999 RJ Cook (3335_CR6) 2002; 11 L Duchateau (3335_CR22) 2008 I Sagara (3335_CR7) 2012; 87 GA Ballinger (3335_CR17) 2004; 7 TM Gill (3335_CR9) 2006; 54 PL Alonso (3335_CR1) 2004; 364 DY Lin (3335_CR19) 1989; 82 SL Zeger (3335_CR27) 1992; 11 SL Zeger (3335_CR29) 1986; 42 YB Cheung (3335_CR11) 2010; 29 SL Zeger (3335_CR28) 1988; 44 16020650 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):706-10 22764039 - Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):4023-39 18338081 - Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(2):107-16 3719049 - Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30 22872683 - Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(17):1287-93 10623910 - Stat Med. 2000 Jan 15;19(1):13-33 17590553 - Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Aug;55(4):297-306 510638 - Demography. 1979 Aug;16(3):439-54 8323597 - Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:43-68 17038069 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1524-30 22764291 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):50-6 12040694 - Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):141-66 1480876 - Stat Med. 1992 Oct-Nov;11(14-15):1825-39 19856276 - Stat Med. 2010 Jan 30;29(2):275-83 15488216 - Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1411-20 16460375 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Feb;54(2):248-54 3233245 - Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60 23452561 - Malar J. 2013;12:82 9160483 - Stat Med. 1997 Apr 30;16(8):833-9; discussion 841-51 16947139 - Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92 19941319 - Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):328-36 |
References_xml | – volume: 16 start-page: 833 year: 1997 ident: 3335_CR4 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970430)16:8<833::AID-SIM538>3.0.CO;2-2 – volume: 54 start-page: 1524 year: 2006 ident: 3335_CR9 publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00890.x – volume: 87 start-page: 50 year: 2012 ident: 3335_CR7 publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0649 – volume: 7 start-page: 127 year: 2004 ident: 3335_CR17 publication-title: Organ Res Methods doi: 10.1177/1094428104263672 – volume-title: Br J Sports Med year: 2012 ident: 3335_CR13 – volume: 134 start-page: 486 year: 2005 ident: 3335_CR30 publication-title: J Stat Plann Infer doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.019 – volume: 29 start-page: 328 year: 2010 ident: 3335_CR11 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4095 – volume: 19 start-page: 13 year: 2000 ident: 3335_CR5 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5 – volume: 11 start-page: 141 year: 2002 ident: 3335_CR6 publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res doi: 10.1191/0962280202sm278ra – volume: 31 start-page: 4023 year: 2012 ident: 3335_CR12 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.5458 – volume: 364 start-page: 1411 year: 2004 ident: 3335_CR1 publication-title: Lancet doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17223-1 – volume: 59 start-page: 706 year: 2005 ident: 3335_CR2 publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.030759 – volume: 44 start-page: 1049 year: 1988 ident: 3335_CR28 publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2531734 – volume-title: Applied Survival Analysis. Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data year: 1999 ident: 3335_CR25 – volume: 55 start-page: 297 year: 2007 ident: 3335_CR15 publication-title: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2007.04.003 – volume-title: The Frailty Model year: 2008 ident: 3335_CR22 – volume-title: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions year: 2003 ident: 3335_CR24 doi: 10.1002/0471445428 – volume: 42 start-page: 121 year: 1986 ident: 3335_CR29 publication-title: Biometrics doi: 10.2307/2531248 – volume-title: Modeling Survival Data extending the Cox Model year: 2000 ident: 3335_CR3 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8 – volume: 54 start-page: 248 year: 2006 ident: 3335_CR10 publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x – volume: 10 start-page: 1100 year: 1982 ident: 3335_CR18 publication-title: Ann Stat doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345976 – volume-title: Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data year: 2000 ident: 3335_CR21 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8 – volume: 11 start-page: 1825 year: 1992 ident: 3335_CR27 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111406 – volume: 25 start-page: 4279 year: 2006 ident: 3335_CR31 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.2673 – volume: 16 start-page: 439 year: 1979 ident: 3335_CR20 publication-title: Demography doi: 10.2307/2061224 – volume: 29 start-page: 275 issue: 2 year: 2010 ident: 3335_CR23 publication-title: Stat Med doi: 10.1002/sim.3749 – volume: 12 start-page: 82 year: 2013 ident: 3335_CR14 publication-title: Mali Malar J doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-82 – volume: 68 start-page: 373 year: 1981 ident: 3335_CR16 publication-title: Biometrika doi: 10.1093/biomet/68.2.373 – volume: 47 start-page: 107 year: 2008 ident: 3335_CR8 publication-title: Methods Inf Med doi: 10.3414/ME0478 – volume: 82 start-page: 1075 year: 1989 ident: 3335_CR19 publication-title: J Am Stat Assoc – volume: 14 start-page: 43 year: 1993 ident: 3335_CR26 publication-title: Annu Rev Public Health doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355 – reference: 9160483 - Stat Med. 1997 Apr 30;16(8):833-9; discussion 841-51 – reference: 15488216 - Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1411-20 – reference: 19856276 - Stat Med. 2010 Jan 30;29(2):275-83 – reference: 18338081 - Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(2):107-16 – reference: 17038069 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1524-30 – reference: 22872683 - Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(17):1287-93 – reference: 17590553 - Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Aug;55(4):297-306 – reference: 510638 - Demography. 1979 Aug;16(3):439-54 – reference: 16460375 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Feb;54(2):248-54 – reference: 3233245 - Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60 – reference: 23452561 - Malar J. 2013;12:82 – reference: 3719049 - Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30 – reference: 10623910 - Stat Med. 2000 Jan 15;19(1):13-33 – reference: 8323597 - Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:43-68 – reference: 12040694 - Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):141-66 – reference: 16947139 - Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92 – reference: 22764039 - Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):4023-39 – reference: 22764291 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):50-6 – reference: 19941319 - Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):328-36 – reference: 1480876 - Stat Med. 1992 Oct-Nov;11(14-15):1825-39 – reference: 16020650 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):706-10 |
SSID | ssj0017872 |
Score | 2.2048469 |
Snippet | Background
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based... Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to... Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based... Doc number: 293 Abstract Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for... Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral hal proquest gale pubmed crossref springer |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 293 |
SubjectTerms | Adolescent Adult Antimalarials - therapeutic use Applications Binomial distribution Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Biostatistics Care and treatment Child Child, Preschool Clinical Trials Computer Simulation Confidence intervals Data analysis Ecology, environment Emerging diseases Entomology Environment and Society Environmental Sciences Estimates Frailty Health Human health and pathology Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Infectious Diseases Information management Life Sciences Malaria Malaria - drug therapy Malaria - epidemiology Mathematics Medical research Medicine, Experimental Methodology Microbiology Microbiology and Parasitology Models, Biological Models, Statistical Mortality Parasitology Patient outcomes Public Health Recurrence Recurrent events Risk Assessment Risk factors Santé publique et épidémiologie Statistics Studies Tropical Medicine Young Adult |
SummonAdditionalLinks | – databaseName: ProQuest Central dbid: BENPR link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fi9QwEB68vRdBxN9XPSWKIAplt2nTpL7IKncsooeIB_cW0iblFrS7Xnf9O_yTnUnTrvVwX5s0ze5MJt9MJt8AvMRNGneekscmqao4s9bGRZnRcaFTXNpSKB-6-HyWL86zjxfiIgTc2pBW2dtEb6jtqqIY-ZTq20jECly8W_-MqWoUna6GEhoHcIgmWIkJHL4_OfvydThHQHXk_eGkyqdJJkWMPoKIE6pglo42o2CSDy4pI_I63LyeNfnP0anfkU7vwO0AJdm8k_1duOGae3Cri8Ox7nrRffhNxc487za7otA6kTExz9rUvmXVUISQrWpGd4s8bTMO6gvktIyitIyy2ZfNdrVtmWkso3u8uyeUms6WPnESFZnhSLvP_DDoNi8Nc2v8hHUto3TUB3B-evLtwyIOVRjiCsHQJi5t7aThFh2PrFbE9-VUXbvcpIhdaiuNUAk2pHKWF1xZmYlZWhdVniXOceIjewiTZtW4I2DcSnxPSoumDW2HMzn6J4ksTa1ULUwWwbQXh64CRTlVyviuvauick0C1CRAnaQaBRjB6-GNdUfPsafvK5KwppWLo1YmXEDAuREHlp6LFK0ROrizCI5HPXHFVaPmF6gjw_eIoHsx_6TpGV1FVuhF_0pwjF6FdDALrd4pcQTPh2YanlLdGody830Q1CGO2tcnp5SBQmCfR51WDtNBTCvTXPAI5EhfR_MdtzTLS08sjoAGN7Aigje9Zv819f_8q4_3_84ncBMhZkbRcF4cw2RztXVPEcZtymdhrf4BEEhG7g priority: 102 providerName: ProQuest – databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access dbid: M48 link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3raxQxEA-2fhFEfLu1ShRBFNbeZvNaQeQQyyHWTx70W8huEnpQ9-rtXdH_wj_ZmezjXFsLft1MsiEzyfwmmQchL0BJg-YpWWqzqkq5cy4tSo7PhV4z5Uqh49XF0Rc5m_NPx-J4Gx7dLWBzqWmH9aTmq9M3P77_fA8b_l3c8FoeZFyJFJC_SDOsS5bvkOuglyTK-BHfvimAaLL-ofKSXiPF1B3POyfoHXkRel70oPzrGTVqp8Pb5FYHK-m0lYM75Jqv75Kb7Z0cbUON7pFfWPgs5uCmK7xmx8RMNGZwat7SaihISJeBYpxRTOEMg8ZiOQ3FG1uKnu2LerPcNNTWjmJM7_YLuqnTRXSihMWlMNL2N98srPPCUn8Gv3C-oeiaep_MDz9-_TBLu4oMaQXAaJ2WLnhlmQMjhAeNub-8DsFLmwOOCU5ZoTNoyNVEFkw7xcUkD0UleeY9w9xkD8huvaz9I0KZU9BPKQfHHJwj3kqwVTJV2qB1EJYn5KBnh6m6dOVYNePURLNFS4MMNMhAk-UGGJiQV0OPszZVxxW0L5HDBuUKRq1sF4wAc8N8WGYqcjiZwNidJGR_RAm7rxo1PwcZGf6Hybpn088Gv2FYsgaL-jyDMXoRMr2EGyzYpAD8MpGQZ0MzDo9ub7UHvkUaAHiAqa6ikeg-UAigedhK5TAdwLcql4IlRI3kdTTfcUu9OIlJxgHcgDIrEvK6l-w_pv6PVd37H-LH5AaAT4735KzYJ7vr1cY_AYC3Lp_Gffsb7ddLyw priority: 102 providerName: Scholars Portal |
Title | Modelling recurrent events: comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data |
URI | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1475-2875-13-293 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25073652 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553722625 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553317185 https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560127955 https://hal.science/hal-01208210 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4132199 |
Volume | 13 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlR1da9RAcPDaF0HEb6P1WEUQhdDLJvsR386j5RBbRDy4t2WT3dCDmivNnb_Dn-zMJpc2Vgu-7EN29oPM7O58D8BbfKTx5Sl4bJOyjDPnXJwXGZkLvebKFUIH1cXJqZwvss9Lsez0HRQLc91-n2h5mGRKxMjVizihmmPpCPYFZRkjs6yc9fYCJDu-M0L-ZdTg0emu3tEZeT7eZCtvekf-YSINL8_xA7jfsYxs2uL4Idzx9SO41-rbWBtG9Bh-UVGzkF-bXZIKnZIusZCdqfnIyr7YIFtXjGKIQnpmnDQUwmkYaWMZea2v6u162zBbO0bxuldfyAWdrYKDJBIsw5mulvlhUTxeWeYvcAnnG0Zup09gcXz0fTaPu2oLcYlMzyYuXOWV5Q4FjKzSlNfL66ry0qbIo1ROWaET7EjVROZcO5WJSVrlpcwS7znlHXsKe_W69s-BcadwnFIOrzC8I7yVKIckqrCV1pWwWQSHO3SYsktFThUxzk0QSbQ0hEBDCDRJahCBEbzvR1y0aThugX1HGDZ0QnHW0naBBrg3ynVlpiLFWwcF2UkEBwNIPFnloPsN0ki_HiXink-_GPpGIccapeWfCc6xIyHTHf_GUDEmhYwtFxG87rtpenJpqz3iLcAg84b80m0wklwDcoEwz1qq7LeDvKtKpeARqAG9DvY77KlXZyGBODIu-FDlEXzYUfa1rf_jr774H-CXcJdqQJMOnOcHsLe53PpXyLxtijGM1FJhq2fJGPY_HZ1-_TYOZ3kc1CHYnmQa2wWf_gZ5TkND |
linkProvider | Springer Nature |
linkToHtml | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bbtMw1NrlASQ0cScwwCAQAilq48Sxg4RQgU0d6yqENmlvxokdrRKk3dKC9hf7Er6Rc5xLCRN922vsHDs5x-fmcyHkBQhpkDwp83WQZX5kjPGTNMLrQiuZMCmXznVxMI6HR9HnY368Rn43uTAYVtnwRMeozTRDH3kP-9sI0BUYfz879bFrFN6uNi00KrLYt-e_wGQr3-19Avy-ZGx35_Dj0K-7CvgZCPe5n5rcCs0MKNJRLrF-lZV5bmMdgizOjdBcBjAQin6cMGlExPthnmRxFFjLsL4WwF0nm6BmJHCKNj_sjL98be8tgPxZcxkq414QCe6DTcL9ADumhR3hV4uA9ROMwLys3l6O0vznqtZJwN2bZKtWXemgorVbZM0Wt8mNyu9Hq3SmO-QCm6u5Ot_0DF35WPyJuipR5VuatU0P6TSnmMvkykQDUNeQp6ToFaYYPT8pFtNFSXVhKOYNL59gKDyduEBNODgUIC2X-aHBTJ9oamewhLElxfDXu-ToSvBzj2wU08I-IJQZAe8JYYCVAq-yOgZ7KBCpzqXMuY480mvQobK6JDp25viunGkkY4UIVIhAFYQKEOiR1-0bs6ocyIq5rxDDCjkFQM10nfAAe8OaW2rAQ-B-YFD3PbLdmQknPOsMPwcaadfDguDDwUjhM0x9lmC1_wwARkNCqmZDpVoeGo88a4cRPIbWFRbw5uaAEgl626o5MYYoJBzm3K-ost0O6NAijDnziOjQa2e_3ZFicuIKmYMCBQIz8cibhrL_2vp__urD1d_5lFwbHh6M1GhvvP-IXAf1NkJPPEu2ycb8bGEfgwo5T5_U55aSb1fNKv4ASJaCuQ |
linkToPdf | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3ri9QwEA_eHogg4tvqqVEEUSi7TZtH_VbUZV3PQ9CD-xbSJuEWtLtcd_07_JOdSR9nPT3wazN50Jkkv5nMg5AXcEnDzVOy2CRVFWfW2jgvM3wudIpJW3IVTBefjsTiOFue8JPO4Nb03u79k2Qb04BZmurtdGN9u8WVmCaZ5DFgfR4nWIks3SP7SgB4mJD9olh-WQ7vCCCOrH-c_Eu_0WXUHcl7p-gReRFuXvSa_OPpNNxI85vkRgcladHy_ha54urb5Hprh6NteNEd8hOLnYW82_QMTeuYjImGrE3NG1oNRQjp2lOMLQppm2HQUCCnoWilpfhrVvVuvWuoqS3FON7zL-iaTlfBcRIEmcJI59N8N6A2rwx1G5jCuoaiO-pdcjx___XtIu6qMMQVgKFtXFrvpGEWFI_MK8z35ZT3TpgUsIu30nCVQEMqZyJnysqMz1KfVyJLnGOYj-wemdTr2j0glFkJ_aS0cLTB2eGMAP0kkaXxSnlusohMe3boqktRjpUyvumgqiihkYEaGaiTVAMDI_Jq6LFp03NcQvsSOaxx58KolekCEGBtmANLFzyF0wgU3FlEDkaUsOOqUfNzkJFhPkzQvSgONX7DUGQFWvSPBMboRUh3x0KjsUiTBMDLeESeDc04PLq61Q74FmgA1AGOuoxGoMtAzoHmfiuVw3IA08pUcBYROZLX0XrHLfXqNCQWB0ADF1gekde9ZP-29H_81Yf_Q_yUXP38bq4PPxx9fESuAfbM0EzO8gMy2Z7t3GPAd9vySbeJfwED6knZ |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling+recurrent+events%3A+comparison+of+statistical+models+with+continuous+and+discontinuous+risk+intervals+on+recurrent+malaria+episodes+data&rft.jtitle=Malaria+journal&rft.au=Sagara%2C+Issaka&rft.au=Giorgi%2C+Roch&rft.au=Doumbo%2C+Ogobara+K&rft.au=Piarroux%2C+Renaud&rft.date=2014-07-29&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1475-2875-13-293&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1475_2875_13_293 |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon |