Modelling recurrent events: comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data

Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMalaria journal Vol. 13; no. 1; p. 293
Main Authors Sagara, Issaka, Giorgi, Roch, Doumbo, Ogobara K, Piarroux, Renaud, Gaudart, Jean
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London BioMed Central 29.07.2014
BioMed Central Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1475-2875
1475-2875
DOI10.1186/1475-2875-13-293

Cover

Loading…
Abstract Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
AbstractList Doc number: 293 Abstract Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods: This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results: Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion: Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures. Keywords: Recurrent events, Malaria, Discontinuous risk intervals, Extended Cox model, Shared frailty model, GEE
Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures.BACKGROUNDRecurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures.This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes.METHODSThis work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes.Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach.RESULTSUsing the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach.Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.CONCLUSIONRepeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model.With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to the first event or consider events within a subject as independent. Even when taking into account the non-independence of recurrent events within subjects, data analyses are mostly done with continuous risk interval models, which may not be appropriate for treatments with sustained effects (e.g., drug treatments of malaria patients). Furthermore, results can be biased in cases of a confounding factor implying different risk exposure, e.g. in malaria transmission: if subjects are located at zones showing different environmental factors implying different risk exposures. Methods: This work aimed to compare four different approaches by analysing recurrent malaria episodes from a clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of three malaria treatments [artesunate + amodiaquine (AS + AQ), artesunate + sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine (AS + SP) or artemether-lumefantrine (AL)], with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals: Andersen-Gill counting process (AG-CP), Prentice-Williams-Peterson counting process (PWP-CP), a shared gamma frailty model, and Generalized Estimating Equations model (GEE) using Poisson distribution. Simulations were also made to analyse the impact of the addition of a confounding factor on malaria recurrent episodes. Results: Using the discontinuous interval analysis, AG-CP and Shared gamma frailty models provided similar estimations of treatment effect on malaria recurrent episodes when adjusted on age category. The patients had significant decreased risk of recurrent malaria episodes when treated with AS + AQ or AS + SP arms compared to AL arm; Relative Risks were: 0.75 (95% CI (Confidence Interval): 0.62-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.88) respectively for AG-CP model and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.64-0.89), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87) for the Shared gamma frailty model. With both discontinuous and continuous risk intervals analysis, GEE Poisson distribution models failed to detect the effect of AS + AQ arm compared to AL arm when adjusted for age category. The discontinuous risk interval analysis was found to be the more appropriate approach. Conclusion: Repeated event in infectious diseases such as malaria can be analysed with appropriate existing models that account for the correlation between multiple events within subjects with common statistical software packages, after properly setting up the data structures.
ArticleNumber 293
Audience Academic
Author Piarroux, Renaud
Gaudart, Jean
Sagara, Issaka
Doumbo, Ogobara K
Giorgi, Roch
AuthorAffiliation 1 Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, BP 1805 Point G, Bamako, Mali
2 Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU), Marseille 13005, France
3 Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3, Marseille 13005, France
AuthorAffiliation_xml – name: 2 Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU), Marseille 13005, France
– name: 1 Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, BP 1805 Point G, Bamako, Mali
– name: 3 Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3, Marseille 13005, France
Author_xml – sequence: 1
  givenname: Issaka
  surname: Sagara
  fullname: Sagara, Issaka
  email: isagara@icermali.org
  organization: Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako, Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU)
– sequence: 2
  givenname: Roch
  surname: Giorgi
  fullname: Giorgi, Roch
  organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU)
– sequence: 3
  givenname: Ogobara K
  surname: Doumbo
  fullname: Doumbo, Ogobara K
  organization: Malaria Research and Training Center, Department of Epidemiology of Parasitic Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Odonto-Stomatogy, University of Sciences, Techniques and Technologies of Bamako
– sequence: 4
  givenname: Renaud
  surname: Piarroux
  fullname: Piarroux, Renaud
  organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR MD3
– sequence: 5
  givenname: Jean
  surname: Gaudart
  fullname: Gaudart, Jean
  organization: Aix-Marseille University, UMR912 SESSTIM (INSERM, IRD, AMU)
BackLink https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25073652$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
https://hal.science/hal-01208210$$DView record in HAL
BookMark eNqNkktv1DAUhSNURB-wZ4UssYHFFD_iR1hUGlWFIg1iA2vLje0Zl8Qe7GQQ_4Kf3BumLdMRIBTJia6_c5ycnOPqIKboquo5waeEKPGG1JLPqIKFsBlt2KPq6H50sPN8WB2Xco0xkUrSJ9Uh5VgywelR9fNjsq7rQlyi7NoxZxcH5DawlreoTf3a5FBSRMmjMpghlCG0pkP9pCroexhWQMUhxDGNBZlokQ1lZwLqryjEweWNAQE4_T6mNx24G-TWcIR1BVkzmKfVYw-ke3Z7P6m-vLv4fH45W3x6_-F8vpi1AuNhdmW9k4baRta1V5go7JT3ThjGVe2tNFwR2GASi4YqK2uOmW9aURPnKK4FO6nOtr7r8ap3toUXyqbT6xx6k3_oZIJ-uBPDSi_TRteEUdI0YPB6a7Dak13OF3qaYUKxogRvCLCvbg_L6dvoyqB7SAlyN9FBSppwAbRsOP8PlDNGJFET-nIPvU5jjpDaL0pSKugOtTSd0yH6BJ_TTqZ6zlkjWI0lBur0DxRc1vUB_qfzAeYPBC9287tP4K5aAIgt0OZUSnZet2FqUJriDJ0mWE8d1lNJ9VRSTZiGDoMQ7wnvvP8hIVtJATQuXd5J4m-aG1FcAs4
CitedBy_id crossref_primary_10_1093_cid_ciy319
crossref_primary_10_1093_ehjqcco_qcx015
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12882_020_01874_x
crossref_primary_10_1186_s41512_025_00187_7
crossref_primary_10_1192_bjp_2020_190
crossref_primary_10_1007_s10461_017_1924_1
crossref_primary_10_1177_1479973118815694
crossref_primary_10_1080_00036846_2023_2200234
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_020_00965_5
crossref_primary_10_1038_s41598_024_78512_1
crossref_primary_10_1080_09286586_2018_1513042
crossref_primary_10_1136_rmdopen_2023_003489
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12874_017_0350_4
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_016_1253_2
crossref_primary_10_1080_16066359_2023_2189245
crossref_primary_10_3389_fepid_2022_924783
crossref_primary_10_1002_sim_9999
crossref_primary_10_1016_j_ijforecast_2022_08_005
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12936_019_2885_9
crossref_primary_10_1097_OLQ_0000000000000986
crossref_primary_10_1186_s12890_017_0503_6
crossref_primary_10_1001_jamanetworkopen_2020_36321
crossref_primary_10_18778_0208_6018_348_07
crossref_primary_10_1093_rheumatology_kead232
Cites_doi 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970430)16:8<833::AID-SIM538>3.0.CO;2-2
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00890.x
10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0649
10.1177/1094428104263672
10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.019
10.1002/sim.4095
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5
10.1191/0962280202sm278ra
10.1002/sim.5458
10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17223-1
10.1136/jech.2004.030759
10.2307/2531734
10.1016/j.respe.2007.04.003
10.1002/0471445428
10.2307/2531248
10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8
10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x
10.1214/aos/1176345976
10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8
10.1002/sim.4780111406
10.1002/sim.2673
10.2307/2061224
10.1002/sim.3749
10.1186/1475-2875-12-82
10.1093/biomet/68.2.373
10.3414/ME0478
10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355
ContentType Journal Article
Copyright Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.
2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Copyright © 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
Copyright_xml – notice: Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
– notice: COPYRIGHT 2014 BioMed Central Ltd.
– notice: 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
– notice: Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
– notice: Copyright © 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 Sagara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
DBID C6C
AAYXX
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
3V.
7SS
7U9
7X7
7XB
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
8FK
ABUWG
AEUYN
AFKRA
AZQEC
BENPR
C1K
CCPQU
DWQXO
F1W
FYUFA
GHDGH
H94
H95
H97
K9.
L.G
M0S
M1P
M7N
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PKEHL
PPXIY
PQEST
PQQKQ
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-13-293
DatabaseName Springer Nature OA Free Journals
CrossRef
Medline
MEDLINE
MEDLINE (Ovid)
MEDLINE
MEDLINE
PubMed
ProQuest Central (Corporate)
Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest)
ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)
Medical Database (Alumni Edition)
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
Hospital Premium Collection
Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
ProQuest One Sustainability
ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Central
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest One
ProQuest Central Korea
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
ProQuest Health Research Premium Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest Health & Medical Collection
Medical Database (ProQuest)
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
ProQuest Central Premium
ProQuest One Academic (New)
Publicly Available Content Database
ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ProQuest Central China
MEDLINE - Academic
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)
Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)
PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)
DatabaseTitle CrossRef
MEDLINE
Medline Complete
MEDLINE with Full Text
PubMed
MEDLINE (Ovid)
Publicly Available Content Database
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)
ProQuest Central Essentials
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)
ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest One Community College
ProQuest One Health & Nursing
ProQuest Central China
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality
Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management
ProQuest Central
ProQuest One Sustainability
Health Research Premium Collection
Health and Medicine Complete (Alumni Edition)
ProQuest Central Korea
Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)
Health & Medical Research Collection
AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts
Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources
ProQuest Central (New)
ProQuest Medical Library (Alumni)
ProQuest Public Health
Virology and AIDS Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition
ProQuest Hospital Collection
Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)
ProQuest Hospital Collection (Alumni)
Entomology Abstracts
ProQuest Health & Medical Complete
ProQuest Medical Library
ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition
ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts
ProQuest One Academic
ProQuest One Academic (New)
ProQuest Central (Alumni)
MEDLINE - Academic
DatabaseTitleList Publicly Available Content Database



MEDLINE - Academic
MEDLINE

Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional
Database_xml – sequence: 1
  dbid: C6C
  name: Springer Nature OA Free Journals
  url: http://www.springeropen.com/
  sourceTypes: Publisher
– sequence: 2
  dbid: NPM
  name: PubMed
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 3
  dbid: EIF
  name: MEDLINE
  url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search
  sourceTypes: Index Database
– sequence: 4
  dbid: BENPR
  name: ProQuest Central
  url: https://www.proquest.com/central
  sourceTypes: Aggregation Database
DeliveryMethod fulltext_linktorsrc
Discipline Public Health
Statistics
Mathematics
Environmental Sciences
EISSN 1475-2875
EndPage 293
ExternalDocumentID PMC4132199
oai_HAL_hal_01208210v1
3405411371
A539634070
25073652
10_1186_1475_2875_13_293
Genre Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Journal Article
GroupedDBID ---
0R~
29M
2WC
4.4
53G
5VS
7X7
88E
8C1
8FI
8FJ
AAFWJ
AAJSJ
AASML
ABDBF
ABUWG
ACGFO
ACGFS
ACIHN
ACMJI
ACPRK
ACUHS
ADBBV
ADRAZ
ADUKV
AEAQA
AENEX
AEUYN
AFKRA
AFPKN
AHBYD
AHMBA
AHSBF
AHYZX
ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS
AMKLP
AMTXH
AOIJS
BAPOH
BAWUL
BCNDV
BENPR
BFQNJ
BMC
BPHCQ
BVXVI
C6C
CCPQU
CS3
DIK
DU5
E3Z
EAD
EAP
EAS
EBD
EBLON
EBS
ECGQY
EJD
EMB
EMK
EMOBN
ESX
F5P
FYUFA
GROUPED_DOAJ
GX1
H13
HMCUK
HYE
IAO
IHR
INH
INR
IPNFZ
ITC
KQ8
M1P
M48
M~E
O5R
O5S
OK1
OVT
P2P
PGMZT
PHGZM
PHGZT
PIMPY
PJZUB
PPXIY
PQQKQ
PROAC
PSQYO
PUEGO
RBZ
RIG
RNS
ROL
RPM
RSV
SBL
SOJ
SV3
TR2
TUS
U2A
UKHRP
W2D
WOQ
WOW
XSB
AAYXX
ALIPV
CITATION
CGR
CUY
CVF
ECM
EIF
NPM
PMFND
3V.
7SS
7U9
7XB
8FK
AZQEC
C1K
DWQXO
F1W
H94
H95
H97
K9.
L.G
M7N
PKEHL
PQEST
PQUKI
PRINS
7X8
1XC
VOOES
5PM
ID FETCH-LOGICAL-c600t-bdfe7a2d9744f80180e8ffe6a3584fd7a5814f83706928d74503f9c641ee20463
IEDL.DBID C6C
ISSN 1475-2875
IngestDate Thu Aug 21 18:14:18 EDT 2025
Thu Jul 10 08:57:06 EDT 2025
Fri Sep 05 05:37:46 EDT 2025
Thu Sep 04 22:20:15 EDT 2025
Fri Jul 25 03:24:19 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 17 22:05:23 EDT 2025
Tue Jun 10 21:02:59 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 03 07:09:09 EDT 2025
Tue Jul 01 02:39:39 EDT 2025
Thu Apr 24 23:05:40 EDT 2025
Sat Sep 06 07:30:03 EDT 2025
IsDoiOpenAccess true
IsOpenAccess true
IsPeerReviewed true
IsScholarly true
Issue 1
Keywords Extended Cox model
Malaria
Shared frailty model
Discontinuous risk intervals
GEE
Recurrent events
Language English
License Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
LinkModel DirectLink
MergedId FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c600t-bdfe7a2d9744f80180e8ffe6a3584fd7a5814f83706928d74503f9c641ee20463
Notes ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
PMCID: PMC4132199
ORCID 0000-0001-9006-5729
0000-0001-6135-3078
OpenAccessLink https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-13-293
PMID 25073652
PQID 1553722625
PQPubID 42600
PageCount 1
ParticipantIDs pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_4132199
hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_01208210v1
proquest_miscellaneous_1560127955
proquest_miscellaneous_1553317185
proquest_journals_1553722625
gale_infotracmisc_A539634070
gale_infotracacademiconefile_A539634070
pubmed_primary_25073652
crossref_citationtrail_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293
crossref_primary_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293
springer_journals_10_1186_1475_2875_13_293
ProviderPackageCode CITATION
AAYXX
PublicationCentury 2000
PublicationDate 2014-07-29
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD 2014-07-29
PublicationDate_xml – month: 07
  year: 2014
  text: 2014-07-29
  day: 29
PublicationDecade 2010
PublicationPlace London
PublicationPlace_xml – name: London
– name: England
PublicationTitle Malaria journal
PublicationTitleAbbrev Malar J
PublicationTitleAlternate Malar J
PublicationYear 2014
Publisher BioMed Central
BioMed Central Ltd
Publisher_xml – name: BioMed Central
– name: BioMed Central Ltd
References J Castilloa (3335_CR30) 2005; 134
A Burton (3335_CR31) 2006; 25
PJ Kelly (3335_CR5) 2000; 19
TM Gill (3335_CR10) 2006; 54
D Coulibaly (3335_CR14) 2013; 12
Z Guo (3335_CR8) 2008; 47
JWR Twisk (3335_CR2) 2005; 59
J Gaudart (3335_CR15) 2007; 55
PK Andersen (3335_CR18) 1982; 10
TM Therneau (3335_CR3) 2000
JW Vaupel (3335_CR20) 1979; 16
KY Liang (3335_CR26) 1993; 14
RL Prentice (3335_CR16) 1981; 68
P Hougaard (3335_CR21) 2000
JL Fleiss (3335_CR24) 2003
S Ullah (3335_CR13) 2012
A Wienke (3335_CR23) 2010; 29
LJ Wei (3335_CR4) 1997; 16
Y Xu (3335_CR12) 2012; 31
DWJ Hosmer (3335_CR25) 1999
RJ Cook (3335_CR6) 2002; 11
L Duchateau (3335_CR22) 2008
I Sagara (3335_CR7) 2012; 87
GA Ballinger (3335_CR17) 2004; 7
TM Gill (3335_CR9) 2006; 54
PL Alonso (3335_CR1) 2004; 364
DY Lin (3335_CR19) 1989; 82
SL Zeger (3335_CR27) 1992; 11
SL Zeger (3335_CR29) 1986; 42
YB Cheung (3335_CR11) 2010; 29
SL Zeger (3335_CR28) 1988; 44
16020650 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):706-10
22764039 - Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):4023-39
18338081 - Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(2):107-16
3719049 - Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30
22872683 - Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(17):1287-93
10623910 - Stat Med. 2000 Jan 15;19(1):13-33
17590553 - Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Aug;55(4):297-306
510638 - Demography. 1979 Aug;16(3):439-54
8323597 - Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:43-68
17038069 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1524-30
22764291 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):50-6
12040694 - Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):141-66
1480876 - Stat Med. 1992 Oct-Nov;11(14-15):1825-39
19856276 - Stat Med. 2010 Jan 30;29(2):275-83
15488216 - Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1411-20
16460375 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Feb;54(2):248-54
3233245 - Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60
23452561 - Malar J. 2013;12:82
9160483 - Stat Med. 1997 Apr 30;16(8):833-9; discussion 841-51
16947139 - Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92
19941319 - Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):328-36
References_xml – volume: 16
  start-page: 833
  year: 1997
  ident: 3335_CR4
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19970430)16:8<833::AID-SIM538>3.0.CO;2-2
– volume: 54
  start-page: 1524
  year: 2006
  ident: 3335_CR9
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00890.x
– volume: 87
  start-page: 50
  year: 2012
  ident: 3335_CR7
  publication-title: Am J Trop Med Hyg
  doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2012.11-0649
– volume: 7
  start-page: 127
  year: 2004
  ident: 3335_CR17
  publication-title: Organ Res Methods
  doi: 10.1177/1094428104263672
– volume-title: Br J Sports Med
  year: 2012
  ident: 3335_CR13
– volume: 134
  start-page: 486
  year: 2005
  ident: 3335_CR30
  publication-title: J Stat Plann Infer
  doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2004.04.019
– volume: 29
  start-page: 328
  year: 2010
  ident: 3335_CR11
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4095
– volume: 19
  start-page: 13
  year: 2000
  ident: 3335_CR5
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000115)19:1<13::AID-SIM279>3.0.CO;2-5
– volume: 11
  start-page: 141
  year: 2002
  ident: 3335_CR6
  publication-title: Stat Methods Med Res
  doi: 10.1191/0962280202sm278ra
– volume: 31
  start-page: 4023
  year: 2012
  ident: 3335_CR12
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.5458
– volume: 364
  start-page: 1411
  year: 2004
  ident: 3335_CR1
  publication-title: Lancet
  doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17223-1
– volume: 59
  start-page: 706
  year: 2005
  ident: 3335_CR2
  publication-title: J Epidemiol Community Health
  doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.030759
– volume: 44
  start-page: 1049
  year: 1988
  ident: 3335_CR28
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2531734
– volume-title: Applied Survival Analysis. Regression Modeling of Time to Event Data
  year: 1999
  ident: 3335_CR25
– volume: 55
  start-page: 297
  year: 2007
  ident: 3335_CR15
  publication-title: Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique
  doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2007.04.003
– volume-title: The Frailty Model
  year: 2008
  ident: 3335_CR22
– volume-title: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
  year: 2003
  ident: 3335_CR24
  doi: 10.1002/0471445428
– volume: 42
  start-page: 121
  year: 1986
  ident: 3335_CR29
  publication-title: Biometrics
  doi: 10.2307/2531248
– volume-title: Modeling Survival Data extending the Cox Model
  year: 2000
  ident: 3335_CR3
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3294-8
– volume: 54
  start-page: 248
  year: 2006
  ident: 3335_CR10
  publication-title: J Am Geriatr Soc
  doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00586.x
– volume: 10
  start-page: 1100
  year: 1982
  ident: 3335_CR18
  publication-title: Ann Stat
  doi: 10.1214/aos/1176345976
– volume-title: Analysis of Multivariate Survival Data
  year: 2000
  ident: 3335_CR21
  doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1304-8
– volume: 11
  start-page: 1825
  year: 1992
  ident: 3335_CR27
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111406
– volume: 25
  start-page: 4279
  year: 2006
  ident: 3335_CR31
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.2673
– volume: 16
  start-page: 439
  year: 1979
  ident: 3335_CR20
  publication-title: Demography
  doi: 10.2307/2061224
– volume: 29
  start-page: 275
  issue: 2
  year: 2010
  ident: 3335_CR23
  publication-title: Stat Med
  doi: 10.1002/sim.3749
– volume: 12
  start-page: 82
  year: 2013
  ident: 3335_CR14
  publication-title: Mali Malar J
  doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-12-82
– volume: 68
  start-page: 373
  year: 1981
  ident: 3335_CR16
  publication-title: Biometrika
  doi: 10.1093/biomet/68.2.373
– volume: 47
  start-page: 107
  year: 2008
  ident: 3335_CR8
  publication-title: Methods Inf Med
  doi: 10.3414/ME0478
– volume: 82
  start-page: 1075
  year: 1989
  ident: 3335_CR19
  publication-title: J Am Stat Assoc
– volume: 14
  start-page: 43
  year: 1993
  ident: 3335_CR26
  publication-title: Annu Rev Public Health
  doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.14.050193.000355
– reference: 9160483 - Stat Med. 1997 Apr 30;16(8):833-9; discussion 841-51
– reference: 15488216 - Lancet. 2004 Oct 16-22;364(9443):1411-20
– reference: 19856276 - Stat Med. 2010 Jan 30;29(2):275-83
– reference: 18338081 - Methods Inf Med. 2008;47(2):107-16
– reference: 17038069 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1524-30
– reference: 22872683 - Br J Sports Med. 2014 Sep;48(17):1287-93
– reference: 17590553 - Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2007 Aug;55(4):297-306
– reference: 510638 - Demography. 1979 Aug;16(3):439-54
– reference: 16460375 - J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Feb;54(2):248-54
– reference: 3233245 - Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60
– reference: 23452561 - Malar J. 2013;12:82
– reference: 3719049 - Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30
– reference: 10623910 - Stat Med. 2000 Jan 15;19(1):13-33
– reference: 8323597 - Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:43-68
– reference: 12040694 - Stat Methods Med Res. 2002 Apr;11(2):141-66
– reference: 16947139 - Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4279-92
– reference: 22764039 - Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):4023-39
– reference: 22764291 - Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Jul;87(1):50-6
– reference: 19941319 - Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):328-36
– reference: 1480876 - Stat Med. 1992 Oct-Nov;11(14-15):1825-39
– reference: 16020650 - J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Aug;59(8):706-10
SSID ssj0017872
Score 2.2048469
Snippet Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based...
Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based on time to...
Background Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often based...
Doc number: 293 Abstract Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for...
Background: Recurrent events data analysis is common in biomedicine. Literature review indicates that most statistical models used for such data are often...
SourceID pubmedcentral
hal
proquest
gale
pubmed
crossref
springer
SourceType Open Access Repository
Aggregation Database
Index Database
Enrichment Source
Publisher
StartPage 293
SubjectTerms Adolescent
Adult
Antimalarials - therapeutic use
Applications
Binomial distribution
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Biostatistics
Care and treatment
Child
Child, Preschool
Clinical Trials
Computer Simulation
Confidence intervals
Data analysis
Ecology, environment
Emerging diseases
Entomology
Environment and Society
Environmental Sciences
Estimates
Frailty
Health
Human health and pathology
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Infectious Diseases
Information management
Life Sciences
Malaria
Malaria - drug therapy
Malaria - epidemiology
Mathematics
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Methodology
Microbiology
Microbiology and Parasitology
Models, Biological
Models, Statistical
Mortality
Parasitology
Patient outcomes
Public Health
Recurrence
Recurrent events
Risk Assessment
Risk factors
Santé publique et épidémiologie
Statistics
Studies
Tropical Medicine
Young Adult
SummonAdditionalLinks – databaseName: ProQuest Central
  dbid: BENPR
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwfV3fi9QwEB68vRdBxN9XPSWKIAplt2nTpL7IKncsooeIB_cW0iblFrS7Xnf9O_yTnUnTrvVwX5s0ze5MJt9MJt8AvMRNGneekscmqao4s9bGRZnRcaFTXNpSKB-6-HyWL86zjxfiIgTc2pBW2dtEb6jtqqIY-ZTq20jECly8W_-MqWoUna6GEhoHcIgmWIkJHL4_OfvydThHQHXk_eGkyqdJJkWMPoKIE6pglo42o2CSDy4pI_I63LyeNfnP0anfkU7vwO0AJdm8k_1duOGae3Cri8Ox7nrRffhNxc487za7otA6kTExz9rUvmXVUISQrWpGd4s8bTMO6gvktIyitIyy2ZfNdrVtmWkso3u8uyeUms6WPnESFZnhSLvP_DDoNi8Nc2v8hHUto3TUB3B-evLtwyIOVRjiCsHQJi5t7aThFh2PrFbE9-VUXbvcpIhdaiuNUAk2pHKWF1xZmYlZWhdVniXOceIjewiTZtW4I2DcSnxPSoumDW2HMzn6J4ksTa1ULUwWwbQXh64CRTlVyviuvauick0C1CRAnaQaBRjB6-GNdUfPsafvK5KwppWLo1YmXEDAuREHlp6LFK0ROrizCI5HPXHFVaPmF6gjw_eIoHsx_6TpGV1FVuhF_0pwjF6FdDALrd4pcQTPh2YanlLdGody830Q1CGO2tcnp5SBQmCfR51WDtNBTCvTXPAI5EhfR_MdtzTLS08sjoAGN7Aigje9Zv819f_8q4_3_84ncBMhZkbRcF4cw2RztXVPEcZtymdhrf4BEEhG7g
  priority: 102
  providerName: ProQuest
– databaseName: Scholars Portal Journals: Open Access
  dbid: M48
  link: http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3raxQxEA-2fhFEfLu1ShRBFNbeZvNaQeQQyyHWTx70W8huEnpQ9-rtXdH_wj_ZmezjXFsLft1MsiEzyfwmmQchL0BJg-YpWWqzqkq5cy4tSo7PhV4z5Uqh49XF0Rc5m_NPx-J4Gx7dLWBzqWmH9aTmq9M3P77_fA8b_l3c8FoeZFyJFJC_SDOsS5bvkOuglyTK-BHfvimAaLL-ofKSXiPF1B3POyfoHXkRel70oPzrGTVqp8Pb5FYHK-m0lYM75Jqv75Kb7Z0cbUON7pFfWPgs5uCmK7xmx8RMNGZwat7SaihISJeBYpxRTOEMg8ZiOQ3FG1uKnu2LerPcNNTWjmJM7_YLuqnTRXSihMWlMNL2N98srPPCUn8Gv3C-oeiaep_MDz9-_TBLu4oMaQXAaJ2WLnhlmQMjhAeNub-8DsFLmwOOCU5ZoTNoyNVEFkw7xcUkD0UleeY9w9xkD8huvaz9I0KZU9BPKQfHHJwj3kqwVTJV2qB1EJYn5KBnh6m6dOVYNePURLNFS4MMNMhAk-UGGJiQV0OPszZVxxW0L5HDBuUKRq1sF4wAc8N8WGYqcjiZwNidJGR_RAm7rxo1PwcZGf6Hybpn088Gv2FYsgaL-jyDMXoRMr2EGyzYpAD8MpGQZ0MzDo9ub7UHvkUaAHiAqa6ikeg-UAigedhK5TAdwLcql4IlRI3kdTTfcUu9OIlJxgHcgDIrEvK6l-w_pv6PVd37H-LH5AaAT4735KzYJ7vr1cY_AYC3Lp_Gffsb7ddLyw
  priority: 102
  providerName: Scholars Portal
Title Modelling recurrent events: comparison of statistical models with continuous and discontinuous risk intervals on recurrent malaria episodes data
URI https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1475-2875-13-293
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25073652
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553722625
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1553317185
https://www.proquest.com/docview/1560127955
https://hal.science/hal-01208210
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC4132199
Volume 13
hasFullText 1
inHoldings 1
isFullTextHit
isPrint
link http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlR1da9RAcPDaF0HEb6P1WEUQhdDLJvsR386j5RBbRDy4t2WT3dCDmivNnb_Dn-zMJpc2Vgu-7EN29oPM7O58D8BbfKTx5Sl4bJOyjDPnXJwXGZkLvebKFUIH1cXJqZwvss9Lsez0HRQLc91-n2h5mGRKxMjVizihmmPpCPYFZRkjs6yc9fYCJDu-M0L-ZdTg0emu3tEZeT7eZCtvekf-YSINL8_xA7jfsYxs2uL4Idzx9SO41-rbWBtG9Bh-UVGzkF-bXZIKnZIusZCdqfnIyr7YIFtXjGKIQnpmnDQUwmkYaWMZea2v6u162zBbO0bxuldfyAWdrYKDJBIsw5mulvlhUTxeWeYvcAnnG0Zup09gcXz0fTaPu2oLcYlMzyYuXOWV5Q4FjKzSlNfL66ry0qbIo1ROWaET7EjVROZcO5WJSVrlpcwS7znlHXsKe_W69s-BcadwnFIOrzC8I7yVKIckqrCV1pWwWQSHO3SYsktFThUxzk0QSbQ0hEBDCDRJahCBEbzvR1y0aThugX1HGDZ0QnHW0naBBrg3ynVlpiLFWwcF2UkEBwNIPFnloPsN0ki_HiXink-_GPpGIccapeWfCc6xIyHTHf_GUDEmhYwtFxG87rtpenJpqz3iLcAg84b80m0wklwDcoEwz1qq7LeDvKtKpeARqAG9DvY77KlXZyGBODIu-FDlEXzYUfa1rf_jr774H-CXcJdqQJMOnOcHsLe53PpXyLxtijGM1FJhq2fJGPY_HZ1-_TYOZ3kc1CHYnmQa2wWf_gZ5TkND
linkProvider Springer Nature
linkToHtml http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwtR3bbtMw1NrlASQ0cScwwCAQAilq48Sxg4RQgU0d6yqENmlvxokdrRKk3dKC9hf7Er6Rc5xLCRN922vsHDs5x-fmcyHkBQhpkDwp83WQZX5kjPGTNMLrQiuZMCmXznVxMI6HR9HnY368Rn43uTAYVtnwRMeozTRDH3kP-9sI0BUYfz879bFrFN6uNi00KrLYt-e_wGQr3-19Avy-ZGx35_Dj0K-7CvgZCPe5n5rcCs0MKNJRLrF-lZV5bmMdgizOjdBcBjAQin6cMGlExPthnmRxFFjLsL4WwF0nm6BmJHCKNj_sjL98be8tgPxZcxkq414QCe6DTcL9ADumhR3hV4uA9ROMwLys3l6O0vznqtZJwN2bZKtWXemgorVbZM0Wt8mNyu9Hq3SmO-QCm6u5Ot_0DF35WPyJuipR5VuatU0P6TSnmMvkykQDUNeQp6ToFaYYPT8pFtNFSXVhKOYNL59gKDyduEBNODgUIC2X-aHBTJ9oamewhLElxfDXu-ToSvBzj2wU08I-IJQZAe8JYYCVAq-yOgZ7KBCpzqXMuY480mvQobK6JDp25viunGkkY4UIVIhAFYQKEOiR1-0bs6ocyIq5rxDDCjkFQM10nfAAe8OaW2rAQ-B-YFD3PbLdmQknPOsMPwcaadfDguDDwUjhM0x9lmC1_wwARkNCqmZDpVoeGo88a4cRPIbWFRbw5uaAEgl626o5MYYoJBzm3K-ost0O6NAijDnziOjQa2e_3ZFicuIKmYMCBQIz8cibhrL_2vp__urD1d_5lFwbHh6M1GhvvP-IXAf1NkJPPEu2ycb8bGEfgwo5T5_U55aSb1fNKv4ASJaCuQ
linkToPdf http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwlV3ri9QwEA_eHogg4tvqqVEEUSi7TZtH_VbUZV3PQ9CD-xbSJuEWtLtcd_07_JOdSR9nPT3wazN50Jkkv5nMg5AXcEnDzVOy2CRVFWfW2jgvM3wudIpJW3IVTBefjsTiOFue8JPO4Nb03u79k2Qb04BZmurtdGN9u8WVmCaZ5DFgfR4nWIks3SP7SgB4mJD9olh-WQ7vCCCOrH-c_Eu_0WXUHcl7p-gReRFuXvSa_OPpNNxI85vkRgcladHy_ha54urb5Hprh6NteNEd8hOLnYW82_QMTeuYjImGrE3NG1oNRQjp2lOMLQppm2HQUCCnoWilpfhrVvVuvWuoqS3FON7zL-iaTlfBcRIEmcJI59N8N6A2rwx1G5jCuoaiO-pdcjx___XtIu6qMMQVgKFtXFrvpGEWFI_MK8z35ZT3TpgUsIu30nCVQEMqZyJnysqMz1KfVyJLnGOYj-wemdTr2j0glFkJ_aS0cLTB2eGMAP0kkaXxSnlusohMe3boqktRjpUyvumgqiihkYEaGaiTVAMDI_Jq6LFp03NcQvsSOaxx58KolekCEGBtmANLFzyF0wgU3FlEDkaUsOOqUfNzkJFhPkzQvSgONX7DUGQFWvSPBMboRUh3x0KjsUiTBMDLeESeDc04PLq61Q74FmgA1AGOuoxGoMtAzoHmfiuVw3IA08pUcBYROZLX0XrHLfXqNCQWB0ADF1gekde9ZP-29H_81Yf_Q_yUXP38bq4PPxx9fESuAfbM0EzO8gMy2Z7t3GPAd9vySbeJfwED6knZ
openUrl ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling+recurrent+events%3A+comparison+of+statistical+models+with+continuous+and+discontinuous+risk+intervals+on+recurrent+malaria+episodes+data&rft.jtitle=Malaria+journal&rft.au=Sagara%2C+Issaka&rft.au=Giorgi%2C+Roch&rft.au=Doumbo%2C+Ogobara+K&rft.au=Piarroux%2C+Renaud&rft.date=2014-07-29&rft.pub=BioMed+Central&rft.eissn=1475-2875&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186%2F1475-2875-13-293&rft.externalDocID=10_1186_1475_2875_13_293
thumbnail_l http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon
thumbnail_m http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon
thumbnail_s http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=1475-2875&client=summon